These PETA nuts are so whacked out! Really disgusting that the same people calling for protecting trees,snailsand minnows are also the most militant about terminating developing humans. Abortion people just imagine? {developing human}:"pretend I am a tree and SAVE ME!"
its a half blink, that or her personal breeding program of human/cat program has backfired...you know she has 60 cats stuck in a one bedroom apartment with newspaper stacked up to the ceiling with more cat scratching posts than furniture...coffee finally kicking in.
This woman even looks crazy. There is something really weird and crazy looking about her eyes. There is no way she should be released on bail at the upcoming hearing since she would obviously represent a continuing threat to society. I doubt very much that being arrested and having a trial pending would change this woman's mind or her views. My guess is that some slick lawyer will get her off on an insanity plea since this woman definitely has mental problems.
What really got me is she wanted to use this to move out. She is 27 and still living at home. Move out, get a life and then maybe you would not feel the need to kill. Cannot believe she actually posted this stuff on facebook.
On Facebook?!? REALLY? As if the idiocy of killing a random person for wearing fur wasn't enough. . . .
At least when some old politician posts some lurid pic in a Tweet or something, they can make the excuse that they don't really understand the new technology. . .this gal is young enough that she grew up with it.
Heres what I want to know... Having a beautiful wife and 2 daughters.... How would a two bit thug have known fake from real fur???!!!!! The women in our home wear faux fur all the time...
Generally it isn't reasonable to judge someone simply from their picture but in this case her visage indicates someone that is severely unhinged and divorced from reality, and obviously a danger to society and herself. I would have thought her family would have taken some action for her own benefit before it got to this point.
This woman isn't realistic at all. Seems to me she wants a lot for $850.00. She wants somebody shot or throat cut with 4" knife or longer along with the person being dead within two mins.. Victim needs to be wearing a fur coat or clothing and live in NE Cleavland. I don't know of anybody that could pull that off for that amount of money.
She reminds me of the commercial where because the father slaps the chair then his daughter picks up the same habit and gets thrown out of school and then marries a deadbeat and has a kid wearing a dog collar. She SHOULD DROP CABLE AND GET DIRECTV IMO.
This woman wouldn't stick out in a crowd by any chance would she?
Did you ever wonder what would happen if we were visited by people from outer space and she was the first person they made contact with?
Only $850? If she wants to have someone killed I think she is going to need a slightly bigger budget than that... Fortunately it does not seem like she has the balls to do it herself.
Ford man! They already visited. They met up with an American gas pump. On the way back to their ship they discussed the fact that Americans weren't very talkative; but damn were they well hung!
Sorry "BALANCE DA BUDGET" @1.1 -but this woman is an extremist, exactly the same kind of extremist as those that espouse the nonsense you posted.
They are easy to spot -find some weak, pathetic segue to change the subject and fart out radical nonsense that only they, and their like-sick-minded compatriots, subscribe to.
Quite frankly, I can't tell the difference between the radical stupidity she says and the radical nonsense that you say -with the simple exception that she is being quoted by the cops after her arrest and we're getting your silliness first hand.
This is what happens when liberals turn psychotic. It's too bad that none of them think that the majority of liberals act like this. It's what republicans/ conservatives have known for years.
Perhaps it is symbolic of the atheistic religion. You know, forget about human life, glorify animals instead to the point that they are on the same level as humans?
I started reading comments and wanted to reply to all. Then Lusitania came along with Louis and Clark! Oh, my, I bet they are!! That's a good one. I really don't get in here much, but I saw this CRAZY WOMAN staring back at me and just wanted to see if the community saw her as I did. I agree with all of what I've had the chance to read. I wouldn't want her living in a 100 mile radius of me. Wondering what her neighbors are feeling right now. Verrrrry Scarrrrry!!! Glad the feds are in on it. Just lock her up somewhere. Don't waste our tax money.
Hey! Libs? I'm a liberal and while I would LOVE to wear a fox fur I think the fox probably looks better in it than I would and so stick to fake fur. Now, I would wear New Zealand 'Possum fur.... its a non native introduced species and is killing native wildlife... but then fur is so political...
She might not be a lib...and, she might not be mentally ill. "Meredith Lowell, 27, of Cleveland Heights," looks like she is about 55, meaning she has had a fairly hard life. I would bet the farm that she is a survivor of childhood abuse - sex and physical - and that is why she wants to strike out against others.
One does not have to be mentally ill to want revenge. On the other hand, she could have some sociopathic or psychopathic driven issues.
In her booking photo, she is fairly UGLY. A little makeup and a different hairstyle would present a completely different person.
Forrest Gump, back in 1994 said, "Stupid is as stupid does." I wonder if this could be the example of "Ugly is as ugly does."
Well this is one solicitation for the use of violence that cannot be blamed on a conservative "wacko". If this woman had family that ate eggs, meat and wore fur and leather why did she not try to arrange the killing of one of her own instead of possibly taking the life of a 12 or 14 year old child? I guess she thinks it is acceptable to have a stranger murdered and put another family through heII. She is willing to destroy a family over her beliefs! This woman looks like she has a lot to be angry about. Her life may be worth less than that of an animal but she cannot make an assumption about anyone else's life. Thank God she was stupid enough to use a social networking site to do her business and an FBI agent was on the other end. The lack of brains should tell us all something about her IQ.
Big time mental issues there. Notice the cut in her eyebrow? Wonder if she is a cutter? That same crazed sociopath look as the shooter of Gabby Giffords. Would like to see a sample of her handwriting that speaks volumes. They walk among us with dead crazy eyes.
Prediction... If some crazy judge lets this weirdo post bond, then she's going to kill someone! I almost guarantee you that she's going to get probation with some counseling too! BAD IDEA, VERY BAD IDEA!
She's only 27! Uh oh! Plenty of years to destroy an innocent life or maybe more lives! Of course, since this is a woman, she will most likely be pampered by the justice system, you watch!
This is what happens when liberals turn psychotic. It's too bad that none of them think that the majority of liberals act like this. It's what republicans/ conservatives have known for years.
Perhaps it is symbolic of the atheistic religion. You know, forget about human life, glorify animals instead to the point that they are on the same level as humans?
Wow. Slow clap in your direction (and anyone else who is deranged enough to think this is a typical "liberal" viewpoint) for turning this into an opportunity to climb on top of your sad, pathetic little conservative & religious soapbox.
You, and all of the republican presidential candidates, are just as (if not more) crazy as she is.
Get a life.
Nothing unusual here.! The lefties always turn to violence to promote their wacko agendas far quicker and in far greater numbers than the right.
Yeah, because all the terrorists, abortion clinic bombers, Koran burners, and the like are just SOOOOOO liberal. You're delusional.
Unhappy158 - I don't know if I would put it that way, but there is some truth to what you say.
It is weird that people who wouldn't dare eat meat will also defend abortions.
They would probably say the same about pro-life people who are for capital punishment. (Although killing 100 murderors vs. 1,200,000 innocent unborn children a year doesn't seem like comparable numbers.)
I certainly hope that this lady represents very few other people. But who knows.
I'm betting not one person in this discourse knows the, (if any,) political affiliation of this crazed whacko and her family. I do know one thing, that visage scares the daylights out of me.
Part of the problem we are seeing is the shutting of a lot mental institutions around the country. Years ago, this would not have even reached the media, as people like this would have been locked away, for their protection, as well as that of the community.
There are many possible implications around this young women, that we know nothing of, and as such, have no right to judge. Now it is up to the courts.
I will say I'm glad I don't live anywhere near this courts jurisdiction. I like wearing my leather jacket too much. But then, I'm too old to be a target for her, at least as far as this article claims. :-)
This woman is a home grown terrorist from the loony left. We need not worry about the radical muslims as we have our own terrorist groups like peta, elf and others of their ilk. She is the epitome of the radical leftist that are destroying this country through their loony legislation. Chipping away at our freedoms one constitutional right at a time. What do you want to bet her home smells like a cat box that hasn't been cleaned in a year?
The stated goal of peta is to ultimately get legislation passed making it illegal to eat any animal. I have seen their sites and it is their stated goal. These are also the same people who think the death penalty is too harsh for murderers who have been found guilty beyond a reason of a doubt. They believe a person who kills an animal should get the death penalty and those who kill other people should get a short time in prison and re education. Yep, That will work. Idiots.
This woman is definitely a few fries short of a Happy Meal. I live in northeast Ohio but thankfully I don't own fur so I don't have anything to fear from this nutball. Cleveland Heights is usually a decent place so I wonder what happened in her background to trigger this sort of mental illness?
. She hoped to be arrested so she could call attention to her beliefs and to get out of the home she shared with her parents and brothers who eat meat and eggs and use fur, leather and wool, investigators said.
Uhm...couldn't she just have moved out?
I can't help notice that long mark in the middle of it's forehead and across the left eyebrow. What are those marks?
Scars from the search for her brain - they came up empty.
In her booking photo, she is fairly UGLY. A little makeup and a different hairstyle would present a completely different person.
She makes Annie Wilkes, from Stephen King's book MISERY, look good.
Let's see........$850 to arrange a hit, definitely not a tenant of the Hotel Reality. Posting it on Facebook, not overly endowed with common sense or cognitive thought processes.
One look at that face and one name comes to mind. Charles Manson.
Wow. Slow clap in your direction (and anyone else who is deranged enough to think this is a typical "liberal" viewpoint) for turning this into an opportunity to climb on top of your sad, pathetic little conservative & religious soapbox.
PrecededByNone: Why not? You liberals do it all the time. It just goes to show you that even when you are wrong you won't remain silent. But go ahead, defend the whacko!
Damn, and people call us law abiding gun owners nuts,,,,, We don't try to hire hit men to take out the tree hugger's. And a target of "at least 12 years old, preferably 14 at least"?!?!? I don't know many kids that age that wear real fur coats. So some random kid wearing a fake fur was going to get offed to make her extremist point?!? And wanting to be there to watch and hand out leaflets?!?! Whooooo Boy, this bitch is loony freaking tunes. Her family should count their lucky stars she didn't off them and cut them up in the basement. Sounds like a dangerously sick puppy. I think there should be a gurney and three chemicals in her future.
And since it's a two party system, which party does that leave?
Let's be honest. When that guy shot the Congresswoman, people tried to link him to Conservatives/Republicans. Even though much of his writing was staight up radical leftist. The media had no problem doing that. Even though ultimately it was proven to be false.
However, I have never heard of a Republican who is a extreme animal rights activist. So unlike the Giffords incident, where there was nothing to show him as on the right (other than liberal media bias), this lady has leftist written all over her face.
And you know good and well you wouldn't bet even a nickle that she is a conservative Republican.
She offered $850 to kill someone wearing fur. It's always fur ... never leather. Of course, it's a lot easier to kill rich, old women than bikers. Probably more expensive too.
Ro...., "don't let them bred", it is to later to prevent the Far Left Liberals from breeding. It is also to late to stop them from controlling the highest political office in the land (Obama). Perhaps we could allow the left to be RETRO-ACTIVELY ABORTED. After all, they want abortion anyways.. It would be good to start with this lunatic. Talk about extremist, no wonder the liberal left cater to the Islamic Terrorist as they basically have the same points of view... That is of course the murder of innocents in order to terrorize the general population into following their nut-job beliefs.
Theres no question she's off...but so are a lot of newsviners apparently. How is it possible that so many posters here are so one track minded that they can do nothing else but reduce every single story they respond to down to party line divisions? Has America's thought process's truly become so blindly black and white? Some lunatic does this or that and they have to be a conservative...another does that or this and they are obviously a liberal. You see No shades of gray people? You truly cannot entertain any thought of individuality wherein people reacte or act according to their own motivations,their own agendas and perplexities and none of which are dictated and governed by their politically leanings?
I cannot believe so many of you have become so overwhelmingly corrupted by party influences you'd allow every facet of your lives to be conformed and catagorized by the political preferences and dictates of some political party! Are you truly that maleable and lacking in individual beliefs as to let your identities be molded by a bunch of politicians and political media to the point it invades nearly every single opinion you have?
Its truly terrifying if this is the case...because these guys have succeeded in doing exactly what they had set out to do! Which is to destroy all individuality in this country to the point that they now have complete control over your hearts and minds and can manipulate you in any direction they want and you will willingly follow them like lemmings right off the cliff and towards this nations complete destruction at their will!
Its definetly a cry for help from her. I just hope she gets it. I'm wondering if maybe she getting therapy from a grizzly bear would produce more positive results for her? All kidding aside, good thing she did this than kill someone and I hope she gets help in the worst way. Theres so much more to life than what a persons wearing.
Hunt - I get it, we should all just agree to disagree.
We can disagree about the size of Gov't - while it keeps growing.
We can disagree aboutthe Gov't taking too much of working people's money - while they keep taking it.
We can disagree about all the handouts - while they have doubled in the last ten years.
We can disagree about abortion - while there are still 1,200,000 a year in the US.
We can disagree about regulations - while there were 40,000 new laws at the state and Federal level in 2011.
We can just agree to disagree, right?
Well you can ride the fence. But for many of us, we are not letting this country go down the toilet without a fight. If you believe much of what we are doing is wrong, you want to change that.
And in a 2 party system, that simply means you must choose a side.
I would be right there with you if support of Gov't was voluntary, or if they only regulated those who agreed to the regulations. But they don't. A liberal and a conservative can agree to disagree about taxes - but the conservative still has to pay those liberal taxes.
We tried the liberal/progressive/democrat/socialist experiment for 80 years. And just like in Greece, it is failing. Many of the nearly 50% that still pay net taxes are ready to end the experiment before it damages our country more.
Of course with over 1/2 net receivers (not payers) it is going to be a battle.
Ironically, if you want to cut entitlements, it is said that you want to take something away from someone. But what about the original people who pay for those entitlements to hand them out? Those are the people who are currently being taken from.
Under your idea, we would just let that be.
NOT A CHANCE IN THE WORLD. PEOPLE HAVE DIED DEFENDING THIS COUNTRY FROM ENEMIES BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.
And we will use our words, our voices, or our votes.
And the idea that Peter can rob Paul, and they should all just get along is absurd.
"I'm appalled and horrified that somebody would think that committing violence is going to further a cause that is all about non-violence," Kaden told the TV channel.
Says the lady linked to a group that regulary used force to free animals, paint to attack people wearing fur...ect. ect.
Tolerance and respect for other people at work here. She seems to be one of the "I'm a good person so I'm allowed to be a bigot" sort, and from my experience that covers the left very well.
The sad thing is that this woman is just a slightly more extreme example of the psychology that drives all animal rights terrorist such as those who belong to groups like PETA. The only reason PETA does not condone violence is because they don’t want the bad press associated with such acts. A lot of them secretly believe that violence is acceptable to get their point across. And they certainly all think that vandalism is acceptable. They are the kind of people who, rather than resolving issues through rational discussion, prefer to angrily cram their views down the throats of everyone else around them. There is no discussion - they are right and everyone else is wrong. They are so arrogant in fact that they apparently think mother nature is wrong. After all there are millions of meat eating animals in nature and its obvious that the food chain needs meat eaters. Do they think we should reform all those lions and tigers, etc., as well as humans, totally ignoring the fact that even if you could somehow do this it would lead to an ecological disaster of monumental proportions. There is no point in trying to have a rational discussion with one of these people however because they are about as far from being rational as you can get. Anyway if you are an animal lover like me and want to help animals send your money to the ASPCA not PETA because people at the ASPCA are not totally insane.
Wow Ryan, that wasn't Hunt's point at all. Glad, however, that you were able to prove his point because it's the most sound one I've read on this otherwise ignorant thread.
Every gun article on the Vine has radicals who say they would use force to protect their gun rights....interesting what is allowed to have rights and what isn't allowed to have rights. Logic and law don't always relate to one another.
Can you imagine not if, but when this looney broad becomes pregnant down the road, what her kids are going to be like? This may be a good time to start forced sterilization here in America!
drainbramage. Your name is fitting. Do you always compare an apple to an orange? One is a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to defend with force and the other is not a right at all. I'm not going to tell you which is which but would rather conduct a small experiment to see if you can figure it out on your own. Now please, no one in the audience should shout out the answer. Lets see if they can figure it out on their very own.
in a cultish type group the leaders don't care, mainly since they think they are right and can't be touched. This woman is evil or mental or both asking to have someone killed 12 or older wearing fur?...the fake stuff can look pretty real and the fact is there are a lot less people in this country who are wearing real fur, cept for the rich and even those few catch hell for it if they are famous.
you are exactly right "OMG Really People", they love to blame all the problems on others, and they try to take credit for things that they had nothing to do with. Instead of fixing problems and actually getting something done, they point fingers and sit back and wait for something to happen and say "ya we ended the war in iraq", or "lowered the deficit", both of which are absolutely false claims. The "fans" will believe anything though.
crazy that politics were brought in to this article, and some loser had to blaim it on Republicans, really ?
honestly, to me it would be more fitting if this lady was a demo, since she tried to hire someone else to do her job and didn't accomplish anything !
Mentally ill people come in all political persuasions, genders, nationalities etc. Y'all stop trying to use this to further your own political agendas.
Letusreason, These Liberal groups leaders work just like the Islam's clerics do. Aways looking for some new idiot to murder innocents for their stupid beliefs.
Actually, wolfpack2000, you are correct. A far left liberal and a religious fascist operate the same way as well. Remember, there is not a difference between a Socialist Dictator and a Fascist Dictator. I am not happy with either party right now, though I do lean on Financial Conservatism.
There is a strong difference between a socialist dictator and a fascist dictator--and a theocratic dictator or a capitalist dictator, too, if you want to know the truth.
A fascist dictator rules by creating fear of the "other" amongst the populist. A "socialist" dictator rules by creating a sense of shared indignity and a fear of the oppressor. A theocratic dictator rules by creating fear that one's afterlife is threatened. A capitalist dictator rules by creating fear of the "mob."
If Hitler was the first, and Stalin was the second--the leaders of the Inquisition were the third and any of a number of potential Republican candidates (Santorum, perhaps? Or, rather, the billionaire supporting Santorum.) represent the fourth.
While all rule by fear--they rule by creating the fear of something (Islamists? "Terrorists"?) to justify eliminating civil rights, imprisoning people, torturing people, and . . . oh, sorry, that was George W. Bush, wasn't it?
Yes, dictators are a bad thing--but the use of fear (or the use of smear-language which creates the fear of some side--like liberals--that don't happen to conform with one's own views) is the one thing they have in common. But, yes, there are differences that are also worth looking at.
Not all socialists/communists are dictators--there are quite a few really happy countries (in fact, the happiest in the world) that are socialist (though they are also capitalist). Not all capitalists are dictators. However, anyone who hasn't quite got the grip that someone like Santorum who wants to impose his own religious views, his own political views ("family values"), and his own narrow choices on others through the law fits the bill a heck of a lot better than most.
Oh, yes, and to get back on topic--I think that this young woman probably has psychosis that is aggravated by her failure to consume animal protein or to get her amino acid supplements in some other way. The phrase "eat a cheeseburger" comes to mind.
Not all socialist regimes are those of dictators by any stretch of the imagination, see Sweden for example, where if they happen to lose an election they leave office, go into opposition, and try to win the next one. However, since Marx taught that the necessary intermediate stage between capitalism and communism was the "dictatorship of the proletariat" and that the Party is "the vanguard of the proletariat", then the dictatorship of the proletariat though its vanguard is both necessary and good, especially given the need to prevent "counterrevolutionary activities". Therefore, all real Communist Party regimes are dictatorial and unapologetic about this.
ban on furs take away the livlihood of native peoples & farmers who grow these animals in areas where most people won't live...(responsible farmers who use all parts of the animal)
until grocery stores carry no meat products or byproducts, this fur ban is targeting a segment of the population with little thought to consequences
she could be paying for a hit on a chicken restaurant patron...but hey, chickens are not that cute, right (last line sarcasm)
I find it amusing that PETA and the other "animal rights" groups target women and kids wearing fur or fake fur. Ever notice how they never walk up to Bikers to spray paint their leathers? I guess they aren't complete morons, they are sharp enough to know spray painting a biker's leather jacket will get them a stay in the hospital. I guess their commitment only goes so far. Their zeal for animal rights stops short of a severe beat down, LOL!!!
I can see the head lines now, "Fifty PETA activists hospitalized with severe injuries after spray paint incident at Sturgis Motorcycle Rally" ROF-LMAO!!!!
LOL........yes, that would be news worthy, though!! Sad to say that this woman is a really sad person, and the best place for her would be anywhere that she can't get to a phone or a computer terminal.
And, hopefully, trying to put a hit out on a 12-14 year old, should land her in some sort of an institution for life. Personally, I don't wear fur, but, I do wear leather. So what? So does most of America. It's a personal choice and I live with it. I eat meat, too! These people need to get a life!!
Yeah....I wear leather too. I friggin love it and I don't give a fuk what any one thinks about it. If any one have a problem with it I would kick your friggin ass with my leather boots.
People have a right to wear fur if they so choose, some may not like it , but that is a personal choice. No one has the right to decide if someone should live or die depending on what clothes they wear, what political party they favor, what their views are on life, unless they are completely bonkers ( far left libs, far right loons, Sea Sheperds, etc...) Live your own life, worry about yourselves !
Se Shepard enforces the law protecting endangered species, Bill. You might not care if the next generation gets a chance at seeing them, but some of us do.
> No one has the right to decide if someone should live or die
This is exactly the point of animal advocates. Meat eaters and fur wearers DO decide if someone lives or dies.
I'm a former 20-year vegetarian who now eats (locally-produced, free-range) meat. I also own a couple pairs of leather shoes. However, I am aware at every minute how much I owe to the animals who unwillingly and unknowingly were killed to provide these for me. I try hard to maximize the useful life of these goods, minimize meat consumption, etc. But with every purchase, I am demanding that an animal die to provide my needs/wants.
This woman has obvious psychological problems and needs treatment and monitoring. But technically, there is no real philosophical difference between her deciding that a random person lives or dies, and me deciding that a random cow lives or dies. The only justification in my defense is that I will benefit from the cow's death, whereas this woman wanted to kill "for sport," as it were.
Meat eaters and fur wearers DO decide if someone lives or dies.
Correction: Meat eaters and fur wearers decide if something lives or dies.
Unless you equate humans and animals. And if so, which animals? At what level of development do animals stop being people? How do you decide? Is it OK to kill mice, but not pigs? Then don't cockroaches have rights, too? Amoebas?
And since you now choose to eat meat, but feel bad about it, how dod you come to make that decision. Expediency?
It's a slippery slope you're treading there, my friend.
S.K.Y Your just a messed up as this woman. So If I felt another human's death would benefit me in a productive way then I would have the right to kill them.
Human life is valued above animal life for a reason. I know it blows your minds to think that way.
Sure, call us animals, but understand that we are humans as well, that simple fact distinguishes us from animals, along with a lot of other factors as well. Especially our cognitive abilities.
Believe in the bible or not, you cannot deny that animals serve humans. Why are wolves undomesticated and dogs domesticated? Dogs are social to humans, wolves are social only to wolves. Dogs serve humans. Wolves serve humans as well, but they serve them by maintaining the ecosystem.
What about horses. Before the car was invented guess how people got around. I guess everyone who rode a horse was now a slave owner right. hope Lincoln stayed away from horse drawn buggies like the plague, or else he was a hypocrite, right?
Tell me this S.K.Y. if a solar flair knocked out all electrical power on the planet, and you had to travel 100miles to find a lost relative. Would you conscientiously object to riding a horse that distance.
If you did you'd change your mind around the 5 mile marker.
@S.K.Y. Meat eaters and fur wearers do NOT decide if someone lives or dies. An animal is not a human being. Except for a few exceptions, they do not have the emotions that humans possess. They do not have the empathy for other animals. In fact if you hold animals to the same standard you like to attribute to humans, your precious animals are killers and murderers. That is how most eat and survive. If it is good enough for the animal world to kill for food why not humans? You people act like human beings are an alien species to this planet. I hate to tell you but human beings are a part of the natural species on this planet. We have as much of a right to survive as any other animal on this planet. Oh, and there is no philosophical difference in a random person being killed or a random cowing being killed? There is a huge difference! Besides the moral issues involved there is the fact that humans generally do not kill other humans for food! It has happened but usually by serial killers and psychopaths. Most mentally stable people know the difference between killing an animal so that there is food on the table and murdering a human being. They are not even remotely the same thing.
Animals are not self aware, do not posses the ability to reason and are devoid of independent logic. Ergo, they are a someone. they are animals guided by instinct. Cattle, sheep, Swine and various foul were domesticated for the express purpose of food. To supply the masses with a ready source of protein without hunting other animals to extinction. It is a biological fact, the human body requires a certain percentage of animal protein and fats, (fatty acids) to function properly. Blame evolution for this. This is why vegetarians require protein supplements. No one should take for granted meat produces, to do so is wasteful. On the other hand, I am not going to invite barn yard animals to share my house. I doubt you would either.
"People have a right to wear fur if they so choose, some may not like it , but that is a personal choice. No one has the right to decide if someone should live or die depending on what clothes they wear, what political party they favor, what their views are on life, unless they are completely bonkers ( far left libs, far right loons, Sea Sheperds, etc...) Live your own life, worry about yourselves !"
People have decided whether other people have the right to live or die based on their political views for centuries. Point in case, the Nazis and World War II, the Taliban, and countries with dictators and lacking democracies. As to what political party they favor, well many people in Egypt last year died for their cause trying to bring on a new government to power. Whether that new government is better than the old one is still a fact to be determined but that's not the main point. Even the Jews died for their faith. As to what clothes they wear, even some women in the Middle East who refused to wear the head coverings were killed. I'm sure some transgender people have even gotten crap for what they wear too and have suffered for their rights. My point is that just because no SHOULD have the right to decide whether someone should live or die based on their clothes, politics, views, (or even I'll add religion), doesn't mean that no one DOES decide whether people should live or die if people do not conform based on these things.
Many wars, just and unjust, have been fought over political views. People have even been killed in the Civil War and other similiar wars because of the color of their skin. Now I do agree with your statement that people have a right to wear fur, but I find your next sentence overarching in its claims. I think that we take for granted in our own country that we have free speech and a free right to voice our opinion, express ourselves, wear whatever we want, vote whatever way we want, choose to believe whatever we want as long as it's within reason. However, other countries are not quite so lucky like those in the Middle East. People in power have always decided for them what to do, what to wear, who to vote for, what to believe. Sometimes, they don't even get a chance to vote. And, if they don't comply, then it's treason and they risk their lives. When they decided to live under their government, they have to agree to abide by the laws or face the consequences. Problem is, their government allows them no freedom.
I don't necessarily agree with the war in Iraq but perhaps that's why it was fought to free those who couldn't help themselves. And, now we are fighting with Libya. What's so encroaching about terrorism though is when other people because of their religious views or personal beliefs decide it is okay to kill another person.
I see her attempt here to kill another person as an act of terrorism. She perceives that because she objects to the person wearing fur she wants to make a statement. But violence never solves anything. And, ultimately, human beings' lives are at stake. And, that animal you are wearing is already dead. How are you solving the problem? Save the living animals and forget about the dead ones!
As to living our own lives and worrying about ourselves, that's all well and good most of the time, but when another's beliefs are crazy or irrational and threaten people's lives as in this case, it becomes a concern. By any means, people should never think that it is okay to shoot another person because they are wearing fur. If she gets away free and other people think what she thinks is okay, then it could start a riot and lead to a violent killing spree of fur wearers. That, I think is what's not okay. Be free and live your own lives, but know what's going on around you. People should take the time to get informed so that they won't easily be swayed by the nice sounding ideas or appealing causes. And, acts of terrorism or violence, even if for a good cause, are never okay.
Another fanatical idiot who chose to take her views to an extreme. Save animals by wanting a person to be murdered. (It's like pro life extremist who kill doctors because they are against abortions). One does not justify the other.
So sick of these self appointed nuts shoving their beliefs down others throats. Fur is legal and anyone who choses to wear it has that right. Just because I don't, doesn't give me the right to hassle others for doing so. Too bad those self imposed individuals don't work on their own life, flaws, and personal issues.... But she will probably have jail time or in a mental institution to work on hers....
I begrudge no one the right to eat meat, after all, I will admit it is quite tasty and for many is the most economical source of some nutritional necessities. However, to claim that all people need animal protein and so therefore all vegetarians have to take protein supplements is absolutely false.
This woman is a fat crazy mess for sure. She embarrasses all of us that love animals and wish they were treated better.
My only issue with your post is the word "right" as in "right to wear".
If one looks up the word "right " in the dictionary it defines it as "a just claim".
See...in these days of human made and environmentally friendly fabrics that are so great at keeping ones temperature regulated--I can see how someone would have a hard time arguing "A just claim" to the wearing of fur.
The industry is dying. All things take time. Her agenda is on it's way (or was until her damaging behavior) to seeing a successful conclusion.
My Grandma had many furs. My mom had one. I don't feel right about it so I have none. I don't think I have "the right".
Time to cue the Kathy Giffords lectures from leaders on the Left, not just other crazies, about how evil the Right is and how their words caused that viollence. Curious what they have to say when a nut case wraps themselves in their cause. Yea, I know, it's always different when it's their cause.
Ageofreason: exactly my point about Giffords. Left wing LEADERS, not nut jobs, were spinning it like it was a Tea Party member when no one knew what the political affiliation was and in particular it was clear the person, like this one, was a nut job!
takenaka, If you look at the crime statistics you will see that you are very wrong. Your liberal party is filled with violent felons as proved by the disparity of convicted criminals in jails and of course, repeat offenders. Wasn't it Acorn going around last time registering inmates to vote for Obama? Liberals can never face the truth.
Unfortuntaely wolfpack...their are all sorts of crazies out there. To be sure they look for groups to affiliate with and well often times still don't fit in. Personally, Im not a supporter of Peta, although I do support other animal groups, it seems unreasonable to target one group for a crazy that may or may not spupport their organization.
I'm guessing that her parents are probably relieved that she got her wish and was arrested, they can no eat in peace.
From her statements she sounds like she would be unable to function very well on her own in society. Who says things like "toward the end of October 2011 or early November 2011 or possibly in January 2012 or February 2012 at the latest"? Sounds over-the-top OCD, probably bundled with a whole lot of other crazy.
As usual the Left-wing fanatics turn out to be the most intolerant and dangerous people. The Progressive one-view phylosophy and their hypocritical attitude about freedom of speech and expression continues to amaze me.
This brand of insanity will find an outlet in one cause or another. She could just as easily have been a right-wing fanatic targeting an abortion doctor. It was just a matter of who got to her first. No sane person on either side of the aisle condones this kind of thing, and shame on you for making insanity a partisan issue.
What is the dufference between this woman and an abortion clinic bomber? NONE... But of course you would say that the bomber is protecting the sactity of life and justify the action... "Protect all life at all cost" untill te kid is 18 and then you would gladly send him/her to a war zone to get killed... Who is the hypocrote then?
RamFla what Pro-Life person, other than other nut jobs, EVER said bombing a clinic was even understandable? Lies like that are how abusers and bigots de-humanize those they hate. And who gladly sends kids to a war zone? Dude it's too early to be that drunk and/or stoned out.
Yep, dehumanize those you don't agree with,tThose damn intolerant folks on the left! The self-rightous conservatives would never hurt or kill anyone to push their cause (like doctors that provide abortions)...Pot meet kettle!
Kevin don't reach into the sewer and find ONE person who justifies attacking an abortion Doctor and extrapolating that across a whole class of people. Called stereotyping which the Left seems to think they never do as they can't see it when they so often do it. Odd isn't it? So Mr. bigot sounds like you've got a soul mate!
As usual the Left-wing fanatics turn out to be the most intolerant and dangerous people. The Progressive one-view phylosophy and their hypocritical attitude about freedom of speech and expression continues to amaze me.
Kevin don't reach into the sewer and find ONE person who justifies attacking an abortion Doctor and extrapolating that across a whole class of people.
Yeah, it's a ggod thing conservatives never do that.
It obvious this person is an aberration. Don't think that it's totally a left-right thing, either, as Stalin never even persecuted people for wearing fur and IIRC, did so himself. On the other hand, G. Gordon Liddy is an adamant supporter of animal welfare, opposes all animal testing, and even wrote a novel in which those who do animal experimentation are the bad guys (The Monkey Handlers).
And, legitimate supporters of annimal welfare don't do this sort of thing, any more than legitimately pro-life would shoot people involved with providing abortions, since they realize that murder is definitely not "pro-life".
If these points were just made I'm sorry, but this time there are just too many comments for even me, or pretty much anyone with a real life, to read all of!
Did I read right in that her intended victim was a child? Aged 12 or 14 or older?
Her case has nothing to do with the ideology of animal rights groups. I'm not counting PETA since they really aren't for animal rights.(They kill more animals than animal shelters, which is a feat in itself. This is not a compliment) It's about a woman who is mentally disturbed, and displays zealot like behavior.
rkb- Lots of people past the age of 25 are living at home with their parents. The recession does that to people. Especially if the younger adult lost their home to the foreclosure storm.
Generalize much? My sister lives at home with my parents. And yeah, now I know you'll do the "the internetz makes me tough" move and say, "Well, yeah, and she's a loser!" But come on, we really know that would be the real loser response.
mndlessWndring banned, calling for hits on a bunch of people they disagree with. Don't do that, folks. If the news story is about some criminal activity, that's not a green light to share fantasies about or request assistance in doing the same.
27 and still living with her parents? Sounds like she needed to get a job and concentrate on making a living, but now it sounds like the govt will be providing all her living accommodations.
I hope when convicted she spends the rest of her life in prison. Some might say but she is crazy; yeah she might be but that does not change my opinion.
How sad for her and her family - she is obviously disturbed. I pray that she will get the help she needs and thank God, an undercover cop, not another disturbed person responded to her request. This might have resulted in a very different outcome.
With all that being said - I have to admit I got a chuckle out of some of the previous postings :-)
You're wasting your time. Chances are she probably doesn't even believe in God, not when she elevates animals to the level of humans. But you're right, some of the other postings were hilarious.
And what do you think people wore before they learned to make woven textiles? oh yeah, leaves. we raise heards to eat and animals to provide fur to wear. The only problem there seems to be is that the meat from the fur animals is not used (or possibly even fit) for consumption by humans so it is wasted.
Please remember she has not yet been given a trial, ... or should we just assume she's guilty because she looks strange?...... Well, What the F*** why not just execute her and spare the trial....
o.k.o.k. here's a compromise, assume her guilt and get a plea bargain to have her tarred and furred...?
What a total wacko! Time to lock her in a 'bathtub' sized cell for a very long time. Just looking at the mug shot you can see there is a very disturbed mind behind those eyes.
While I agree with you that this woman is very probably mentally ill, if you knew anything about mental illness you might be a bit more compassionate. No one chooses metal illness, it just happens to them. A bit like cancer, no one chooses to have cancer, it just happens to them. Should she be held in a mental hospital? Yes, of course. Should she be tormented because of her disease? Absolutely NOT. It would be the equivalent of locking a cancer sufferer in a "bathtub" sized cell for a very long time.
Actually that is not entirely correct, 1.) instead of doing drugs that destroy the mind a person can opt for healthier hobbies. Or seek help for their addiction.
2.) Instead of driving drunk, a person can instead choose not to drink OR ensure that the person or persons with them designate a sober driver.
3.) Instead of committing a crime, and hiding behind a mental illness, they could instead seek help for their issue.
So while NOT ALL mentally ill people have the choice, the ones that do, can choose otherwise. Yet the ones that have the choice to live a healthier life choose to not do so. From what I have seen, most do it to defy some invisible person who says they have to live the way their parents told them too.
Some invisble person telling them it's more fun to do what they're told not to do and everyone just wants to make sure they don't have fun is more like it.
Daaaaaaaaaaamn.......I always knew that these wack jobs were lonely women. She is proof of that!!! I bet if girlfriend could get laid every now and again it would calm her *ss down and she would be less of a fanatic. This pathetic woman will no doubt be in the news again once released.
Typical Paranoid Personality Disorder. suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting, harming, or deceiving her. Is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear that the information will be used maliciously against her. She reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign remarks or events. Persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults , injuries, or slights perceives attacks on her character or reputation that are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack. Has recurrent suspicions, without justification. She will end up in a state hospital most likely for the rest of life. Typical.
That's The PETA MO, Anyone who say fur is murder among other things will take the next step at some point. Paranoid Personality Disorder. suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting, harming, or deceiving her. Is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear that the information will be used maliciously against her. She reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign remarks or events. Persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults , injuries, or slights perceives attacks on her character or reputation that are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack. Has recurrent suspicions, without justification. She will end up in a state hospital most likely for the rest of life
No, I can only go $850 and if you could work with me to get it down to $830 that would be appreciated. That way my mental disability check will cover it and I'll still have $20 left for my anti-psychotic meds that aren't working.
OK, the meds aren't working anyway and I'm sure my brain is worth $3 and besides, I'm not using it. But it has to be around those dates listed because that's when the checks show up.
I'm sure this is just going to get weirder and weirder as the details come out. Not that it's not right up there already.
Do I detect just a smig of mental disease or defect here???
These PETA nuts are so whacked out! Really disgusting that the same people calling for protecting trees,snailsand minnows are also the most militant about terminating developing humans. Abortion people just imagine? {developing human}:"pretend I am a tree and SAVE ME!"
Wow, she doesn't look like a psycho (sarcasm)....... But BALANCE sure sounds like one (not sarcasm).
is it irony or hypocrisy that she doesn't want animals killed but willing to hire someone to kill a human?...sorry still on my first cup of coffee.
What the hell is that layer of thin skin over her eyeballs? Is she part kitty cat? Part shark? What the hell is that?
its a half blink, that or her personal breeding program of human/cat program has backfired...you know she has 60 cats stuck in a one bedroom apartment with newspaper stacked up to the ceiling with more cat scratching posts than furniture...coffee finally kicking in.
Unlike the examples in Alanis Morissette's song, this would be the proper use of the word Ironic :-)
This woman even looks crazy. There is something really weird and crazy looking about her eyes. There is no way she should be released on bail at the upcoming hearing since she would obviously represent a continuing threat to society. I doubt very much that being arrested and having a trial pending would change this woman's mind or her views. My guess is that some slick lawyer will get her off on an insanity plea since this woman definitely has mental problems.
She lives with her parents who eat meat, eggs and use fur and leather.
Sounds like they might also have been targets.
Animal rights "enthusiasts" are truly scary people!!
What really got me is she wanted to use this to move out. She is 27 and still living at home. Move out, get a life and then maybe you would not feel the need to kill. Cannot believe she actually posted this stuff on facebook.
Really
You missed the 'wood' part. Wood???
What really got me is the minimum age of the potential victims. As young as 12 or 14. Truly sickening.
And the timeframe, by the end of Oct or Nov. Well...Maybe Jan or Feb, but no later than that, do you hear?
Beware ! This is what eating processed soy products over a long period of time will do to you.
:-)
This is what happens when you eat paint chips!
@ NEA Exec
Really? NEA Executive? "smig" No wonder our children can't read!!
S - M - I - D - G - E
smidge (smɪdʒ)
— n
informal a very small amount or part
[C20: from smidgen ]
On Facebook?!? REALLY? As if the idiocy of killing a random person for wearing fur wasn't enough. . . .
At least when some old politician posts some lurid pic in a Tweet or something, they can make the excuse that they don't really understand the new technology. . .this gal is young enough that she grew up with it.
I bet she has a 2000# per square inch bite force; and that her eyes roll clear back into her skull when she eats a fur wearer!
Lunatic fringe
Heres what I want to know... Having a beautiful wife and 2 daughters.... How would a two bit thug have known fake from real fur???!!!!! The women in our home wear faux fur all the time...
Jeff, "wish they were in hiding".
@ Steve
If you are going to "cut and paste" to call someone out, at least cite the source; hypocrite.
Generally it isn't reasonable to judge someone simply from their picture but in this case her visage indicates someone that is severely unhinged and divorced from reality, and obviously a danger to society and herself. I would have thought her family would have taken some action for her own benefit before it got to this point.
This woman isn't realistic at all. Seems to me she wants a lot for $850.00. She wants somebody shot or throat cut with 4" knife or longer along with the person being dead within two mins.. Victim needs to be wearing a fur coat or clothing and live in NE Cleavland. I don't know of anybody that could pull that off for that amount of money.
She reminds me of the commercial where because the father slaps the chair then his daughter picks up the same habit and gets thrown out of school and then marries a deadbeat and has a kid wearing a dog collar. She SHOULD DROP CABLE AND GET DIRECTV IMO.
This woman wouldn't stick out in a crowd by any chance would she?
Did you ever wonder what would happen if we were visited by people from outer space and she was the first person they made contact with?
Put her away and make her live on steak and eggs, and dress her only in fur. Should drive her the rest of the way crazy.
Why do people with good intentions (I'm assuming here, probably a mistake) do such stupid things? (A rhetorical question :) )
Only $850? If she wants to have someone killed I think she is going to need a slightly bigger budget than that... Fortunately it does not seem like she has the balls to do it herself.
She is getting ready to shed her skin.
Ford man! They already visited. They met up with an American gas pump. On the way back to their ship they discussed the fact that Americans weren't very talkative; but damn were they well hung!
Sorry "BALANCE DA BUDGET" @1.1 -but this woman is an extremist, exactly the same kind of extremist as those that espouse the nonsense you posted.
They are easy to spot -find some weak, pathetic segue to change the subject and fart out radical nonsense that only they, and their like-sick-minded compatriots, subscribe to.
Quite frankly, I can't tell the difference between the radical stupidity she says and the radical nonsense that you say -with the simple exception that she is being quoted by the cops after her arrest and we're getting your silliness first hand.
Good luck with that
Another white person when wacko.
Bet she's a Lib
Louis and Clark are rolling over in their grave.
I don't think it's a smidge of a mental defect--I think she's quite simply a sociopath.
There's no cure for that, either.
she and people like her should have been aborted... and im against abortion. You know she is a lib!
she looks like a fine upstanding model citizen..... but not from this planet
She looks pretty well fed - I doubt she is a vegan or vegetarian.
the vegetarians NEED to know that my food poops on their food :)
How many of these freaks are out there walking around?
This is what happens when liberals turn psychotic. It's too bad that none of them think that the majority of liberals act like this. It's what republicans/ conservatives have known for years.
Perhaps it is symbolic of the atheistic religion. You know, forget about human life, glorify animals instead to the point that they are on the same level as humans?
One word comes to mind; PSYCHO!!!!!!!!!!!
No, "Nea". (I don't know where you get a name like that!) That picture you see is that of an "android"; (like Mr. Data in Star Trek.)
I can't help notice that long mark in the middle of it's forehead and across the left eyebrow. What are those marks?
Stop the elevator, I need to get off right now. WTF has this world turned into!!!!!?????? Sorry, fat tuesday bring's the worst out of some of us.
I started reading comments and wanted to reply to all. Then Lusitania came along with Louis and Clark! Oh, my, I bet they are!! That's a good one. I really don't get in here much, but I saw this CRAZY WOMAN staring back at me and just wanted to see if the community saw her as I did. I agree with all of what I've had the chance to read. I wouldn't want her living in a 100 mile radius of me. Wondering what her neighbors are feeling right now. Verrrrry Scarrrrry!!! Glad the feds are in on it. Just lock her up somewhere. Don't waste our tax money.
To say this is one seriously sick chick would be a gross understatement!
Hey! Libs? I'm a liberal and while I would LOVE to wear a fox fur I think the fox probably looks better in it than I would and so stick to fake fur. Now, I would wear New Zealand 'Possum fur.... its a non native introduced species and is killing native wildlife... but then fur is so political...
She might not be a lib...and, she might not be mentally ill. "Meredith Lowell, 27, of Cleveland Heights," looks like she is about 55, meaning she has had a fairly hard life. I would bet the farm that she is a survivor of childhood abuse - sex and physical - and that is why she wants to strike out against others.
One does not have to be mentally ill to want revenge. On the other hand, she could have some sociopathic or psychopathic driven issues.
In her booking photo, she is fairly UGLY. A little makeup and a different hairstyle would present a completely different person.
Forrest Gump, back in 1994 said, "Stupid is as stupid does." I wonder if this could be the example of "Ugly is as ugly does."
This is the results of protein deficiency
Well this is one solicitation for the use of violence that cannot be blamed on a conservative "wacko". If this woman had family that ate eggs, meat and wore fur and leather why did she not try to arrange the killing of one of her own instead of possibly taking the life of a 12 or 14 year old child? I guess she thinks it is acceptable to have a stranger murdered and put another family through heII. She is willing to destroy a family over her beliefs! This woman looks like she has a lot to be angry about. Her life may be worth less than that of an animal but she cannot make an assumption about anyone else's life. Thank God she was stupid enough to use a social networking site to do her business and an FBI agent was on the other end. The lack of brains should tell us all something about her IQ.
Big time mental issues there. Notice the cut in her eyebrow? Wonder if she is a cutter? That same crazed sociopath look as the shooter of Gabby Giffords. Would like to see a sample of her handwriting that speaks volumes. They walk among us with dead crazy eyes.
Prediction... If some crazy judge lets this weirdo post bond, then she's going to kill someone! I almost guarantee you that she's going to get probation with some counseling too! BAD IDEA, VERY BAD IDEA!
She's only 27! Uh oh! Plenty of years to destroy an innocent life or maybe more lives! Of course, since this is a woman, she will most likely be pampered by the justice system, you watch!
Nothing unusual here.! The lefties always turn to violence to promote their wacko agendas far quicker and in far greater numbers than the right.
I am really getting sick and tired of these violent female refartbubblelicans! Ha ha
Wow. Slow clap in your direction (and anyone else who is deranged enough to think this is a typical "liberal" viewpoint) for turning this into an opportunity to climb on top of your sad, pathetic little conservative & religious soapbox.
You, and all of the republican presidential candidates, are just as (if not more) crazy as she is.
Get a life.
Yeah, because all the terrorists, abortion clinic bombers, Koran burners, and the like are just SOOOOOO liberal. You're delusional.
wow.....she is a psycho!!!!! librals and republicans have nothing to do with it!!!!!!!
Unhappy158 - I don't know if I would put it that way, but there is some truth to what you say.
It is weird that people who wouldn't dare eat meat will also defend abortions.
They would probably say the same about pro-life people who are for capital punishment. (Although killing 100 murderors vs. 1,200,000 innocent unborn children a year doesn't seem like comparable numbers.)
I certainly hope that this lady represents very few other people. But who knows.
I detect a touch of Downs. And not the football kind.
I don't think politics creates psychotics... their platforms give the unbalanced a way to justify their own views and actions.
Why, when I look at her picture, do I hear banjo music in my head?
I'm betting not one person in this discourse knows the, (if any,) political affiliation of this crazed whacko and her family. I do know one thing, that visage scares the daylights out of me.
Part of the problem we are seeing is the shutting of a lot mental institutions around the country. Years ago, this would not have even reached the media, as people like this would have been locked away, for their protection, as well as that of the community.
There are many possible implications around this young women, that we know nothing of, and as such, have no right to judge. Now it is up to the courts.
I will say I'm glad I don't live anywhere near this courts jurisdiction. I like wearing my leather jacket too much. But then, I'm too old to be a target for her, at least as far as this article claims. :-)
This woman is a home grown terrorist from the loony left. We need not worry about the radical muslims as we have our own terrorist groups like peta, elf and others of their ilk. She is the epitome of the radical leftist that are destroying this country through their loony legislation. Chipping away at our freedoms one constitutional right at a time. What do you want to bet her home smells like a cat box that hasn't been cleaned in a year?
The stated goal of peta is to ultimately get legislation passed making it illegal to eat any animal. I have seen their sites and it is their stated goal. These are also the same people who think the death penalty is too harsh for murderers who have been found guilty beyond a reason of a doubt. They believe a person who kills an animal should get the death penalty and those who kill other people should get a short time in prison and re education. Yep, That will work. Idiots.
She's lucky they didn't slit her throat. From the pic it looks like she may be one of the species with fur!
Glad to see the crazy people are usually the stupid one.
This woman is definitely a few fries short of a Happy Meal. I live in northeast Ohio but thankfully I don't own fur so I don't have anything to fear from this nutball. Cleveland Heights is usually a decent place so I wonder what happened in her background to trigger this sort of mental illness?
WOW....just WOW!!! That is one butt-ugly, crazy biotch!
I'm sure I would be pissed off at the world too, if I had to look at that every time I looked in the mirror...
. She hoped to be arrested so she could call attention to her beliefs and to get out of the home she shared with her parents and brothers who eat meat and eggs and use fur, leather and wool, investigators said.
Uhm...couldn't she just have moved out?
I can't help notice that long mark in the middle of it's forehead and across the left eyebrow. What are those marks?
Scars from the search for her brain - they came up empty.
In her booking photo, she is fairly UGLY. A little makeup and a different hairstyle would present a completely different person.
She makes Annie Wilkes, from Stephen King's book MISERY, look good.
Let's see........$850 to arrange a hit, definitely not a tenant of the Hotel Reality. Posting it on Facebook, not overly endowed with common sense or cognitive thought processes.
One look at that face and one name comes to mind. Charles Manson.
Good lord, woman. Take that $850 and get thee to a good plastic surgeon, stat!
PrecededByNone: Why not? You liberals do it all the time. It just goes to show you that even when you are wrong you won't remain silent. But go ahead, defend the whacko!
Damn, and people call us law abiding gun owners nuts,,,,, We don't try to hire hit men to take out the tree hugger's. And a target of "at least 12 years old, preferably 14 at least"?!?!? I don't know many kids that age that wear real fur coats. So some random kid wearing a fake fur was going to get offed to make her extremist point?!? And wanting to be there to watch and hand out leaflets?!?! Whooooo Boy, this bitch is loony freaking tunes. Her family should count their lucky stars she didn't off them and cut them up in the basement. Sounds like a dangerously sick puppy. I think there should be a gurney and three chemicals in her future.
"We don't know her political affiliation"
Ok, but we can rule out Conservative/Republican.
And since it's a two party system, which party does that leave?
Let's be honest. When that guy shot the Congresswoman, people tried to link him to Conservatives/Republicans. Even though much of his writing was staight up radical leftist. The media had no problem doing that. Even though ultimately it was proven to be false.
However, I have never heard of a Republican who is a extreme animal rights activist. So unlike the Giffords incident, where there was nothing to show him as on the right (other than liberal media bias), this lady has leftist written all over her face.
And you know good and well you wouldn't bet even a nickle that she is a conservative Republican.
She offered $850 to kill someone wearing fur. It's always fur ... never leather. Of course, it's a lot easier to kill rich, old women than bikers. Probably more expensive too.
Spay and Neuter these scary extremists. Dont let them breed!
Ro...., "don't let them bred", it is to later to prevent the Far Left Liberals from breeding. It is also to late to stop them from controlling the highest political office in the land (Obama). Perhaps we could allow the left to be RETRO-ACTIVELY ABORTED. After all, they want abortion anyways.. It would be good to start with this lunatic. Talk about extremist, no wonder the liberal left cater to the Islamic Terrorist as they basically have the same points of view... That is of course the murder of innocents in order to terrorize the general population into following their nut-job beliefs.
Theres no question she's off...but so are a lot of newsviners apparently. How is it possible that so many posters here are so one track minded that they can do nothing else but reduce every single story they respond to down to party line divisions? Has America's thought process's truly become so blindly black and white? Some lunatic does this or that and they have to be a conservative...another does that or this and they are obviously a liberal. You see No shades of gray people? You truly cannot entertain any thought of individuality wherein people reacte or act according to their own motivations,their own agendas and perplexities and none of which are dictated and governed by their politically leanings?
I cannot believe so many of you have become so overwhelmingly corrupted by party influences you'd allow every facet of your lives to be conformed and catagorized by the political preferences and dictates of some political party! Are you truly that maleable and lacking in individual beliefs as to let your identities be molded by a bunch of politicians and political media to the point it invades nearly every single opinion you have?
Its truly terrifying if this is the case...because these guys have succeeded in doing exactly what they had set out to do! Which is to destroy all individuality in this country to the point that they now have complete control over your hearts and minds and can manipulate you in any direction they want and you will willingly follow them like lemmings right off the cliff and towards this nations complete destruction at their will!
Its definetly a cry for help from her. I just hope she gets it. I'm wondering if maybe she getting therapy from a grizzly bear would produce more positive results for her? All kidding aside, good thing she did this than kill someone and I hope she gets help in the worst way. Theres so much more to life than what a persons wearing.
@Hunt
Don't tap on the aquarium ... it annoys the fish.
Hunt - I get it, we should all just agree to disagree.
We can disagree about the size of Gov't - while it keeps growing.
We can disagree aboutthe Gov't taking too much of working people's money - while they keep taking it.
We can disagree about all the handouts - while they have doubled in the last ten years.
We can disagree about abortion - while there are still 1,200,000 a year in the US.
We can disagree about regulations - while there were 40,000 new laws at the state and Federal level in 2011.
We can just agree to disagree, right?
Well you can ride the fence. But for many of us, we are not letting this country go down the toilet without a fight. If you believe much of what we are doing is wrong, you want to change that.
And in a 2 party system, that simply means you must choose a side.
I would be right there with you if support of Gov't was voluntary, or if they only regulated those who agreed to the regulations. But they don't. A liberal and a conservative can agree to disagree about taxes - but the conservative still has to pay those liberal taxes.
We tried the liberal/progressive/democrat/socialist experiment for 80 years. And just like in Greece, it is failing. Many of the nearly 50% that still pay net taxes are ready to end the experiment before it damages our country more.
Of course with over 1/2 net receivers (not payers) it is going to be a battle.
Ironically, if you want to cut entitlements, it is said that you want to take something away from someone. But what about the original people who pay for those entitlements to hand them out? Those are the people who are currently being taken from.
Under your idea, we would just let that be.
NOT A CHANCE IN THE WORLD. PEOPLE HAVE DIED DEFENDING THIS COUNTRY FROM ENEMIES BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.
And we will use our words, our voices, or our votes.
And the idea that Peter can rob Paul, and they should all just get along is absurd.
LOL
If you care about the animals so much then why are you eating your food?
:D
PSYCHO HOSE BEAST ! Nuttier than squirrel crap.
From the story...
Says the lady linked to a group that regulary used force to free animals, paint to attack people wearing fur...ect. ect.
Tolerance and respect for other people at work here. She seems to be one of the "I'm a good person so I'm allowed to be a bigot" sort, and from my experience that covers the left very well.
The sad thing is that this woman is just a slightly more extreme example of the psychology that drives all animal rights terrorist such as those who belong to groups like PETA. The only reason PETA does not condone violence is because they don’t want the bad press associated with such acts. A lot of them secretly believe that violence is acceptable to get their point across. And they certainly all think that vandalism is acceptable. They are the kind of people who, rather than resolving issues through rational discussion, prefer to angrily cram their views down the throats of everyone else around them. There is no discussion - they are right and everyone else is wrong. They are so arrogant in fact that they apparently think mother nature is wrong. After all there are millions of meat eating animals in nature and its obvious that the food chain needs meat eaters. Do they think we should reform all those lions and tigers, etc., as well as humans, totally ignoring the fact that even if you could somehow do this it would lead to an ecological disaster of monumental proportions. There is no point in trying to have a rational discussion with one of these people however because they are about as far from being rational as you can get. Anyway if you are an animal lover like me and want to help animals send your money to the ASPCA not PETA because people at the ASPCA are not totally insane.
I couldn't see any more mental disease or defect than with the rest of that nutso PETA crowd.
I would bet money this goofball wears leather shoes and eats at a fast food place.
ZOMBIE ALERT!!!!
Whew! Ya never know where they'll spring up next. Good thing they were keeping an eye on FaceBook!
Wow Ryan, that wasn't Hunt's point at all. Glad, however, that you were able to prove his point because it's the most sound one I've read on this otherwise ignorant thread.
Eeesh! Let's get her out of The Pool before she pees....
Every gun article on the Vine has radicals who say they would use force to protect their gun rights....interesting what is allowed to have rights and what isn't allowed to have rights. Logic and law don't always relate to one another.
A mental case. One that puts her away for a long time I hope. I hope she gets a wool blanket in jail.
i am a member of PETA...........
People.......Eating ........Tasty........Animals.............
this chick is a few bricks shy of a full load......for sure.
Can you imagine not if, but when this looney broad becomes pregnant down the road, what her kids are going to be like? This may be a good time to start forced sterilization here in America!
drainbramage. Your name is fitting. Do you always compare an apple to an orange? One is a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to defend with force and the other is not a right at all. I'm not going to tell you which is which but would rather conduct a small experiment to see if you can figure it out on your own. Now please, no one in the audience should shout out the answer. Lets see if they can figure it out on their very own.
PrecededByNone, you're suspended for a day for violating #1 of the Code of Honor.
...
Coastal Exchange, see above - don't make it personal.
Weak minded persons that get involved in these rabid groups listen to the inflammatory rhetoric, then act.
The leaders of the groups never take responsibility for the results of their rhetoric.
in a cultish type group the leaders don't care, mainly since they think they are right and can't be touched. This woman is evil or mental or both asking to have someone killed 12 or older wearing fur?...the fake stuff can look pretty real and the fact is there are a lot less people in this country who are wearing real fur, cept for the rich and even those few catch hell for it if they are famous.
Yes, just like the weak minded people that support inflammatory political rhetoric designed to take us back 50 years or more.
Let's stop talking about the Republican party and get back to the article.
Great one D! LOL
i must have missed something,
manny moe and jack above had a laugh about politics, and there were no politics involved.
so they must be doemoncants cause now they are just making stuff up.
either that or they are the same person, either way take you politics and shove them into a political artical.
Yes, very fundamentalist of her, isn't it.
you are exactly right "OMG Really People", they love to blame all the problems on others, and they try to take credit for things that they had nothing to do with. Instead of fixing problems and actually getting something done, they point fingers and sit back and wait for something to happen and say "ya we ended the war in iraq", or "lowered the deficit", both of which are absolutely false claims. The "fans" will believe anything though.
crazy that politics were brought in to this article, and some loser had to blaim it on Republicans, really ?
honestly, to me it would be more fitting if this lady was a demo, since she tried to hire someone else to do her job and didn't accomplish anything !
HOOOOO yes I said it
Mentally ill people come in all political persuasions, genders, nationalities etc. Y'all stop trying to use this to further your own political agendas.
WOW...and I mean WOW!!! This bitch is CCCCRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZY!!!
Letusreason, These Liberal groups leaders work just like the Islam's clerics do. Aways looking for some new idiot to murder innocents for their stupid beliefs.
yeah....just like the Christian murdering doctors and bombing clinics, right?
Actually, wolfpack2000, you are correct. A far left liberal and a religious fascist operate the same way as well. Remember, there is not a difference between a Socialist Dictator and a Fascist Dictator. I am not happy with either party right now, though I do lean on Financial Conservatism.
By the way wolfpack, eco-terrorism is nothing new.
There is a strong difference between a socialist dictator and a fascist dictator--and a theocratic dictator or a capitalist dictator, too, if you want to know the truth.
A fascist dictator rules by creating fear of the "other" amongst the populist. A "socialist" dictator rules by creating a sense of shared indignity and a fear of the oppressor. A theocratic dictator rules by creating fear that one's afterlife is threatened. A capitalist dictator rules by creating fear of the "mob."
If Hitler was the first, and Stalin was the second--the leaders of the Inquisition were the third and any of a number of potential Republican candidates (Santorum, perhaps? Or, rather, the billionaire supporting Santorum.) represent the fourth.
While all rule by fear--they rule by creating the fear of something (Islamists? "Terrorists"?) to justify eliminating civil rights, imprisoning people, torturing people, and . . . oh, sorry, that was George W. Bush, wasn't it?
Yes, dictators are a bad thing--but the use of fear (or the use of smear-language which creates the fear of some side--like liberals--that don't happen to conform with one's own views) is the one thing they have in common. But, yes, there are differences that are also worth looking at.
Not all socialists/communists are dictators--there are quite a few really happy countries (in fact, the happiest in the world) that are socialist (though they are also capitalist). Not all capitalists are dictators. However, anyone who hasn't quite got the grip that someone like Santorum who wants to impose his own religious views, his own political views ("family values"), and his own narrow choices on others through the law fits the bill a heck of a lot better than most.
Oh, yes, and to get back on topic--I think that this young woman probably has psychosis that is aggravated by her failure to consume animal protein or to get her amino acid supplements in some other way. The phrase "eat a cheeseburger" comes to mind.
A dictator is a dictator, only the political path use to get there are different.
Not all socialist regimes are those of dictators by any stretch of the imagination, see Sweden for example, where if they happen to lose an election they leave office, go into opposition, and try to win the next one. However, since Marx taught that the necessary intermediate stage between capitalism and communism was the "dictatorship of the proletariat" and that the Party is "the vanguard of the proletariat", then the dictatorship of the proletariat though its vanguard is both necessary and good, especially given the need to prevent "counterrevolutionary activities". Therefore, all real Communist Party regimes are dictatorial and unapologetic about this.
Obama is certainly a Dictator wannabee.
They step over the homeless to spit on those who wear fur.
ban on furs take away the livlihood of native peoples & farmers who grow these animals in areas where most people won't live...(responsible farmers who use all parts of the animal)
until grocery stores carry no meat products or byproducts, this fur ban is targeting a segment of the population with little thought to consequences
she could be paying for a hit on a chicken restaurant patron...but hey, chickens are not that cute, right (last line sarcasm)
Cows can't speak for themselves! I'm going to have some tongue tacos for lunch!
What was it an unknow (at least to me) comic said... if God didn't want me to eat beef, why did he make cows so easy to catch.
Sirlafalot,
... and some after the lights go dark...
mmmmmmm, yummy yummy cows..................
Tyler Durden; are you homeless? Not that there is necessarily some evil in being homeless but where do you write your post's from - the gutter?
PETA = People Eating Tasty Animals
I find it amusing that PETA and the other "animal rights" groups target women and kids wearing fur or fake fur. Ever notice how they never walk up to Bikers to spray paint their leathers? I guess they aren't complete morons, they are sharp enough to know spray painting a biker's leather jacket will get them a stay in the hospital. I guess their commitment only goes so far. Their zeal for animal rights stops short of a severe beat down, LOL!!!
I can see the head lines now, "Fifty PETA activists hospitalized with severe injuries after spray paint incident at Sturgis Motorcycle Rally" ROF-LMAO!!!!
LOL........yes, that would be news worthy, though!! Sad to say that this woman is a really sad person, and the best place for her would be anywhere that she can't get to a phone or a computer terminal.
And, hopefully, trying to put a hit out on a 12-14 year old, should land her in some sort of an institution for life. Personally, I don't wear fur, but, I do wear leather. So what? So does most of America. It's a personal choice and I live with it. I eat meat, too! These people need to get a life!!
Yeah....I wear leather too. I friggin love it and I don't give a fuk what any one thinks about it. If any one have a problem with it I would kick your friggin ass with my leather boots.
People have a right to wear fur if they so choose, some may not like it , but that is a personal choice. No one has the right to decide if someone should live or die depending on what clothes they wear, what political party they favor, what their views are on life, unless they are completely bonkers ( far left libs, far right loons, Sea Sheperds, etc...) Live your own life, worry about yourselves !
Se Shepard enforces the law protecting endangered species, Bill. You might not care if the next generation gets a chance at seeing them, but some of us do.
> No one has the right to decide if someone should live or die
This is exactly the point of animal advocates. Meat eaters and fur wearers DO decide if someone lives or dies.
I'm a former 20-year vegetarian who now eats (locally-produced, free-range) meat. I also own a couple pairs of leather shoes. However, I am aware at every minute how much I owe to the animals who unwillingly and unknowingly were killed to provide these for me. I try hard to maximize the useful life of these goods, minimize meat consumption, etc. But with every purchase, I am demanding that an animal die to provide my needs/wants.
This woman has obvious psychological problems and needs treatment and monitoring. But technically, there is no real philosophical difference between her deciding that a random person lives or dies, and me deciding that a random cow lives or dies. The only justification in my defense is that I will benefit from the cow's death, whereas this woman wanted to kill "for sport," as it were.
Correction: Meat eaters and fur wearers decide if something lives or dies.
Unless you equate humans and animals. And if so, which animals? At what level of development do animals stop being people? How do you decide? Is it OK to kill mice, but not pigs? Then don't cockroaches have rights, too? Amoebas?
And since you now choose to eat meat, but feel bad about it, how dod you come to make that decision. Expediency?
It's a slippery slope you're treading there, my friend.
S.K.Y Your just a messed up as this woman. So If I felt another human's death would benefit me in a productive way then I would have the right to kill them.
Human life is valued above animal life for a reason. I know it blows your minds to think that way.
Sure, call us animals, but understand that we are humans as well, that simple fact distinguishes us from animals, along with a lot of other factors as well. Especially our cognitive abilities.
Believe in the bible or not, you cannot deny that animals serve humans. Why are wolves undomesticated and dogs domesticated? Dogs are social to humans, wolves are social only to wolves. Dogs serve humans. Wolves serve humans as well, but they serve them by maintaining the ecosystem.
What about horses. Before the car was invented guess how people got around. I guess everyone who rode a horse was now a slave owner right. hope Lincoln stayed away from horse drawn buggies like the plague, or else he was a hypocrite, right?
Tell me this S.K.Y. if a solar flair knocked out all electrical power on the planet, and you had to travel 100miles to find a lost relative. Would you conscientiously object to riding a horse that distance.
If you did you'd change your mind around the 5 mile marker.
Coming this fall, SKY can live on Stem Cell meat. No need to kill for it and maybe there will be a leather shoe coming your way from Stem Cell hides.
@S.K.Y. Meat eaters and fur wearers do NOT decide if someone lives or dies. An animal is not a human being. Except for a few exceptions, they do not have the emotions that humans possess. They do not have the empathy for other animals. In fact if you hold animals to the same standard you like to attribute to humans, your precious animals are killers and murderers. That is how most eat and survive. If it is good enough for the animal world to kill for food why not humans? You people act like human beings are an alien species to this planet. I hate to tell you but human beings are a part of the natural species on this planet. We have as much of a right to survive as any other animal on this planet. Oh, and there is no philosophical difference in a random person being killed or a random cowing being killed? There is a huge difference! Besides the moral issues involved there is the fact that humans generally do not kill other humans for food! It has happened but usually by serial killers and psychopaths. Most mentally stable people know the difference between killing an animal so that there is food on the table and murdering a human being. They are not even remotely the same thing.
Hey Pedestrian;
That would be SEA Shepard, not Se Shepard.
SKY;
Animals are not self aware, do not posses the ability to reason and are devoid of independent logic. Ergo, they are a someone. they are animals guided by instinct. Cattle, sheep, Swine and various foul were domesticated for the express purpose of food. To supply the masses with a ready source of protein without hunting other animals to extinction. It is a biological fact, the human body requires a certain percentage of animal protein and fats, (fatty acids) to function properly. Blame evolution for this. This is why vegetarians require protein supplements. No one should take for granted meat produces, to do so is wasteful. On the other hand, I am not going to invite barn yard animals to share my house. I doubt you would either.
"People have a right to wear fur if they so choose, some may not like it , but that is a personal choice. No one has the right to decide if someone should live or die depending on what clothes they wear, what political party they favor, what their views are on life, unless they are completely bonkers ( far left libs, far right loons, Sea Sheperds, etc...) Live your own life, worry about yourselves !"
People have decided whether other people have the right to live or die based on their political views for centuries. Point in case, the Nazis and World War II, the Taliban, and countries with dictators and lacking democracies. As to what political party they favor, well many people in Egypt last year died for their cause trying to bring on a new government to power. Whether that new government is better than the old one is still a fact to be determined but that's not the main point. Even the Jews died for their faith. As to what clothes they wear, even some women in the Middle East who refused to wear the head coverings were killed. I'm sure some transgender people have even gotten crap for what they wear too and have suffered for their rights. My point is that just because no SHOULD have the right to decide whether someone should live or die based on their clothes, politics, views, (or even I'll add religion), doesn't mean that no one DOES decide whether people should live or die if people do not conform based on these things.
Many wars, just and unjust, have been fought over political views. People have even been killed in the Civil War and other similiar wars because of the color of their skin. Now I do agree with your statement that people have a right to wear fur, but I find your next sentence overarching in its claims. I think that we take for granted in our own country that we have free speech and a free right to voice our opinion, express ourselves, wear whatever we want, vote whatever way we want, choose to believe whatever we want as long as it's within reason. However, other countries are not quite so lucky like those in the Middle East. People in power have always decided for them what to do, what to wear, who to vote for, what to believe. Sometimes, they don't even get a chance to vote. And, if they don't comply, then it's treason and they risk their lives. When they decided to live under their government, they have to agree to abide by the laws or face the consequences. Problem is, their government allows them no freedom.
I don't necessarily agree with the war in Iraq but perhaps that's why it was fought to free those who couldn't help themselves. And, now we are fighting with Libya. What's so encroaching about terrorism though is when other people because of their religious views or personal beliefs decide it is okay to kill another person.
I see her attempt here to kill another person as an act of terrorism. She perceives that because she objects to the person wearing fur she wants to make a statement. But violence never solves anything. And, ultimately, human beings' lives are at stake. And, that animal you are wearing is already dead. How are you solving the problem? Save the living animals and forget about the dead ones!
As to living our own lives and worrying about ourselves, that's all well and good most of the time, but when another's beliefs are crazy or irrational and threaten people's lives as in this case, it becomes a concern. By any means, people should never think that it is okay to shoot another person because they are wearing fur. If she gets away free and other people think what she thinks is okay, then it could start a riot and lead to a violent killing spree of fur wearers. That, I think is what's not okay. Be free and live your own lives, but know what's going on around you. People should take the time to get informed so that they won't easily be swayed by the nice sounding ideas or appealing causes. And, acts of terrorism or violence, even if for a good cause, are never okay.
Another fanatical idiot who chose to take her views to an extreme. Save animals by wanting a person to be murdered. (It's like pro life extremist who kill doctors because they are against abortions). One does not justify the other.
So sick of these self appointed nuts shoving their beliefs down others throats. Fur is legal and anyone who choses to wear it has that right. Just because I don't, doesn't give me the right to hassle others for doing so. Too bad those self imposed individuals don't work on their own life, flaws, and personal issues.... But she will probably have jail time or in a mental institution to work on hers....
I begrudge no one the right to eat meat, after all, I will admit it is quite tasty and for many is the most economical source of some nutritional necessities. However, to claim that all people need animal protein and so therefore all vegetarians have to take protein supplements is absolutely false.
Bill
This woman is a fat crazy mess for sure. She embarrasses all of us that love animals and wish they were treated better.
My only issue with your post is the word "right" as in "right to wear".
If one looks up the word "right " in the dictionary it defines it as "a just claim".
See...in these days of human made and environmentally friendly fabrics that are so great at keeping ones temperature regulated--I can see how someone would have a hard time arguing "A just claim" to the wearing of fur.
The industry is dying. All things take time. Her agenda is on it's way (or was until her damaging behavior) to seeing a successful conclusion.
My Grandma had many furs. My mom had one. I don't feel right about it so I have none. I don't think I have "the right".
Respectfully- Just sayin'.
This is one crazy b!tch.
Don't call her a bitch. You insult dogs! LOL
Careful Mike. Crazy lady doesn't like it when you insult dogs.....
She is so nutty that even the squirrels won't touch her!!
Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeesh!!!!
A candidate for PETA President
P - People
E - Eating
T - Tasty
A - Animals
mmmmmm......animals
Frank that is awesome!
Time to cue the Kathy Giffords lectures from leaders on the Left, not just other crazies, about how evil the Right is and how their words caused that viollence. Curious what they have to say when a nut case wraps themselves in their cause. Yea, I know, it's always different when it's their cause.
Not all republicans are evil. It is true many are inclined to cause violence.
A nut job is a nut job, regardless of political affiliation.
How does anyone know this girls political affiliation?
ageofreason99: animal-rights activist=Left side of the political spectrum.
Kill someone 12 or older wearing fur?...=Way Way Left on the Political Spectrum.
How does anyone know this girls political affiliation?=Common Sense.... Any other Questions?
Ageofreason: exactly my point about Giffords. Left wing LEADERS, not nut jobs, were spinning it like it was a Tea Party member when no one knew what the political affiliation was and in particular it was clear the person, like this one, was a nut job!
but the truly insane become liberals and animal rights loonies.
I see nibor the troll has returned.
You mean Gabby?
takenaka, If you look at the crime statistics you will see that you are very wrong. Your liberal party is filled with violent felons as proved by the disparity of convicted criminals in jails and of course, repeat offenders. Wasn't it Acorn going around last time registering inmates to vote for Obama? Liberals can never face the truth.
that is one sick and wierd looking woman....and still lives with her parents...might be an insanity case...
That lice infested OWS tent must be really crowded.
Perhaps they will be able to get a little bit of crazy off Ohio streets. Sadly they still walk among us.
Yeah....they are called themself PETA.
Unfortuntaely wolfpack...their are all sorts of crazies out there. To be sure they look for groups to affiliate with and well often times still don't fit in. Personally, Im not a supporter of Peta, although I do support other animal groups, it seems unreasonable to target one group for a crazy that may or may not spupport their organization.
I'm guessing that her parents are probably relieved that she got her wish and was arrested, they can no eat in peace.
I don't support PETA but i totally support the humane society.
Well she got her wish of being arrested and calling attention to herself. But did i hear right, she's 27 living at home with her parents and brothers.
From her statements she sounds like she would be unable to function very well on her own in society. Who says things like "toward the end of October 2011 or early November 2011 or possibly in January 2012 or February 2012 at the latest"? Sounds over-the-top OCD, probably bundled with a whole lot of other crazy.
Dont blame OCD for this nutjob.
As usual the Left-wing fanatics turn out to be the most intolerant and dangerous people. The Progressive one-view phylosophy and their hypocritical attitude about freedom of speech and expression continues to amaze me.
This brand of insanity will find an outlet in one cause or another. She could just as easily have been a right-wing fanatic targeting an abortion doctor. It was just a matter of who got to her first. No sane person on either side of the aisle condones this kind of thing, and shame on you for making insanity a partisan issue.
What is the dufference between this woman and an abortion clinic bomber? NONE... But of course you would say that the bomber is protecting the sactity of life and justify the action... "Protect all life at all cost" untill te kid is 18 and then you would gladly send him/her to a war zone to get killed... Who is the hypocrote then?
I wonder if she will eat her meat ration in prison?
RamFla what Pro-Life person, other than other nut jobs, EVER said bombing a clinic was even understandable? Lies like that are how abusers and bigots de-humanize those they hate. And who gladly sends kids to a war zone? Dude it's too early to be that drunk and/or stoned out.
Yep, dehumanize those you don't agree with,tThose damn intolerant folks on the left! The self-rightous conservatives would never hurt or kill anyone to push their cause (like doctors that provide abortions)...Pot meet kettle!
Kevin don't reach into the sewer and find ONE person who justifies attacking an abortion Doctor and extrapolating that across a whole class of people. Called stereotyping which the Left seems to think they never do as they can't see it when they so often do it. Odd isn't it? So Mr. bigot sounds like you've got a soul mate!
Yeah, it's a ggod thing conservatives never do that.
It obvious this person is an aberration. Don't think that it's totally a left-right thing, either, as Stalin never even persecuted people for wearing fur and IIRC, did so himself. On the other hand, G. Gordon Liddy is an adamant supporter of animal welfare, opposes all animal testing, and even wrote a novel in which those who do animal experimentation are the bad guys (The Monkey Handlers).
And, legitimate supporters of annimal welfare don't do this sort of thing, any more than legitimately pro-life would shoot people involved with providing abortions, since they realize that murder is definitely not "pro-life".
If these points were just made I'm sorry, but this time there are just too many comments for even me, or pretty much anyone with a real life, to read all of!
Cuckoo! Cuckoo! Cuckoo! Cuckoo!
Careful, Maria. Your comment is insulting to birds. You may upset Peta.
Yikes, one uber creepy ginge. No wonder she went crazy, it must be psychologically damaging that no man (or woman) would want to touch you.
Did I read right in that her intended victim was a child? Aged 12 or 14 or older?
Her case has nothing to do with the ideology of animal rights groups. I'm not counting PETA since they really aren't for animal rights.(They kill more animals than animal shelters, which is a feat in itself. This is not a compliment) It's about a woman who is mentally disturbed, and displays zealot like behavior.
rkb- Lots of people past the age of 25 are living at home with their parents. The recession does that to people. Especially if the younger adult lost their home to the foreclosure storm.
San, you are right. Those people are called LOSERS
Generalize much? My sister lives at home with my parents. And yeah, now I know you'll do the "the internetz makes me tough" move and say, "Well, yeah, and she's a loser!" But come on, we really know that would be the real loser response.
@disgusted,
I totally agree with you....In this damn economy that doesn't leave many option. Them two are morons and probably roommate.
Red Terror on behalf of the mink class.
mndlessWndring banned, calling for hits on a bunch of people they disagree with. Don't do that, folks. If the news story is about some criminal activity, that's not a green light to share fantasies about or request assistance in doing the same.
27 and still living with her parents? Sounds like she needed to get a job and concentrate on making a living, but now it sounds like the govt will be providing all her living accommodations.
Yeah...momma won't be making her favorite turkey potpie anymore.
I hope when convicted she spends the rest of her life in prison. Some might say but she is crazy; yeah she might be but that does not change my opinion.
ashley, I bet she won't do any time. I bet she gets probation and is forced to go to some counseling. I predict she will murder someone down the road.
How sad for her and her family - she is obviously disturbed. I pray that she will get the help she needs and thank God, an undercover cop, not another disturbed person responded to her request. This might have resulted in a very different outcome.
With all that being said - I have to admit I got a chuckle out of some of the previous postings :-)
You're wasting your time. Chances are she probably doesn't even believe in God, not when she elevates animals to the level of humans. But you're right, some of the other postings were hilarious.
I have to question why she would choose a random 12-14 year old kid, when her own family wears fur, leather, and eats eggs and meat.
If she were truly enraged at the supposed atrocities she would have started with her own family first.
God is the one who created these people. Yeah really, thank God.
He created you too. Obviously He expected some defects in the product line.
Keith for the win with the humble Christian-like reply!
Sorry Keith....I don't believed in God. If he or she does exists, God would be nothing but a serial killer.
Crazy assed flake.
And what do you think people wore before they learned to make woven textiles? oh yeah, leaves. we raise heards to eat and animals to provide fur to wear. The only problem there seems to be is that the meat from the fur animals is not used (or possibly even fit) for consumption by humans so it is wasted.
Fig leaves?
Chef80
Yes, they put on leaves which was not a suitable covering. God made skins of fur from animals for them to cover their nakedness (sin) sufficiently.
What a stupid retarded woman. There's a peaceful way to express your feelings. Then there are those idiot fanatics!!!
Fur looks gorgeous!!! So, yes, a dead animal on my body looks cute. If you really want to get technical.
so f*ck off!
You people are ruining my steak dinner........
Please remember she has not yet been given a trial, ... or should we just assume she's guilty because she looks strange?...... Well, What the F*** why not just execute her and spare the trial....
o.k.o.k. here's a compromise, assume her guilt and get a plea bargain to have her tarred and furred...?
How about you go take your medication and go to bed........
What a total wacko! Time to lock her in a 'bathtub' sized cell for a very long time. Just looking at the mug shot you can see there is a very disturbed mind behind those eyes.
While I agree with you that this woman is very probably mentally ill, if you knew anything about mental illness you might be a bit more compassionate. No one chooses metal illness, it just happens to them. A bit like cancer, no one chooses to have cancer, it just happens to them. Should she be held in a mental hospital? Yes, of course. Should she be tormented because of her disease? Absolutely NOT. It would be the equivalent of locking a cancer sufferer in a "bathtub" sized cell for a very long time.
Actually that is not entirely correct,
1.) instead of doing drugs that destroy the mind a person can opt for healthier hobbies. Or seek help for their addiction.
2.) Instead of driving drunk, a person can instead choose not to drink OR ensure that the person or persons with them designate a sober driver.
3.) Instead of committing a crime, and hiding behind a mental illness, they could instead seek help for their issue.
So while NOT ALL mentally ill people have the choice, the ones that do, can choose otherwise. Yet the ones that have the choice to live a healthier life choose to not do so. From what I have seen, most do it to defy some invisible person who says they have to live the way their parents told them too.
Some invisble person telling them it's more fun to do what they're told not to do and everyone just wants to make sure they don't have fun is more like it.
Daaaaaaaaaaamn.......I always knew that these wack jobs were lonely women. She is proof of that!!! I bet if girlfriend could get laid every now and again it would calm her *ss down and she would be less of a fanatic. This pathetic woman will no doubt be in the news again once released.
Shouldn't you be in school?
Okay, she's a wack-job. But Jeffrey Dahmer trumps this chick.
for me....It had to cum through the back door so I wouldn't have to look at her face.
@LD1218....at least Dahmer ate what he killed........and yes I most certainly went there.
The problem with Dahmer was he doesn't likes fish...he prefer the salami.
Typical Paranoid Personality Disorder. suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting, harming, or deceiving her. Is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear that the information will be used maliciously against her. She reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign remarks or events. Persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults , injuries, or slights perceives attacks on her character or reputation that are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack. Has recurrent suspicions, without justification. She will end up in a state hospital most likely for the rest of life. Typical.
Most would prefer her to be put down like any other rabid animal.
TRUE! (indianrelics husband here)
That's The PETA MO, Anyone who say fur is murder among other things will take the next step at some point. Paranoid Personality Disorder. suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting, harming, or deceiving her. Is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear that the information will be used maliciously against her. She reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign remarks or events. Persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults , injuries, or slights perceives attacks on her character or reputation that are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack. Has recurrent suspicions, without justification. She will end up in a state hospital most likely for the rest of life
Nah! bill is correct.
Political derailing deleted. There's a whole section for politics.
That is one SEXY activist. Is her head lopsided or is it that fashionable hair-do?
We could "arrange" to save the justice system some time and money!
Can anyone chip in $855?
No, I can only go $850 and if you could work with me to get it down to $830 that would be appreciated. That way my mental disability check will cover it and I'll still have $20 left for my anti-psychotic meds that aren't working.
Ok, $853 and not a penny lower :-)
OK, the meds aren't working anyway and I'm sure my brain is worth $3 and besides, I'm not using it. But it has to be around those dates listed because that's when the checks show up.
I'm sure this is just going to get weirder and weirder as the details come out. Not that it's not right up there already.