The reason of having so many drugs coming into the US is because the poverty of all the Latin American countries forces them to come here -or sell drugs- Not all illegal aliens are from Mexico. There are plenty of illegal aliens that come here with a tourist visa and never leave.
I was going to post the exact same thing when I read the news post on msn. In fact I am surprised someone hasnt rented a billboard right at the border and posted it yet
Make you a trade, one illegal mexican, for one illegal gun......sounds fair....but I'm more under the impression that the illegal drug dealing and money laundering mexicans coming here are smuggling the guns back into mexico, so Mexico get some of what you call "MUY GRANDE COJONES" and start solving your own problems, before blaming someone else due to the lack of your own governments control over its people....or do you want us to police mexico with drone strikes too........
I am so ashamed that Obama and Holder are both GUILTY of sending weapons to mexico. Yes they are personally responsible and should be held accountable for the deaths!
Yes, you can put that sign up but the Politicians representing their owners will take it down.
They love looking the other way on cheap labor. It's a cornerstone of their platform to make profits at the expense of the working man on both sides of the borders!
Keep looking the other way bub! I like the tunnel vision and lack of personal responsibility. It renders us collectively on a path to cultural failure. Good Job!
A slow death is still a death, and truth be known, character flaws are at the root of both. Mexicans want guns to kill each other, Americans want drugs so they can kill themselves and others by proxy. If Mexico puts its house in order, their people wouldn't need to come here to survive. Greed is at the root of all of it, and I wish us good luck with that one; it's destroyed every "civilization" on the planet. at one time or another. Talk is cheap - how about some action?
Mr. Punish....same concept should work for the weapons coming into Mexico, but Mr. Calderone would rather try and make it look like it's all the U.S.' fault instead of taking responsibility himself.
Exactly right. We should be responding: "Tell you what, Mexico- we'll stop it with the guns if YOU stop the filthy criminal alien leeches coming across the border. That sound fair?"
It is not automatic weapons that are coming from the US it is semi-automatic weapons that were sold during Holder's Operation Fast and Furious. No one in the US with a FFL would jepordize that to sell a fuly automatic weapon. Besides the paperwork that is needed for a fully automatic weapon sale is horrendous. Most of the fully automatic weapons are coming in from Central and South America.
That being said - Mr. Calderon, you stop the influx of Meth and your people into our country we might help you out.
Tell Holder ;"No More weapons"......and hey,maybe just for @!$%#s and giggles we could prosecute,and incarcerate ANYONE caught moving weapons out of THIS country illegally....starting with HOLDER,AND his handlers........years ago my old police dpt. had us put bumper stickers on all of the patrol cars that said;"Use a gun in a crime,go to jail,mandatory 5 years".....that was back in Jersey,and of course,the idiot judges never followed through..............It offends me that some politician will find a way to blame this on us gun owners that actually follow the rules.....after all it IS an election year......and BOTH parties still suck........U.S.Army Disabled Veteran...
I am so ashamed that Obama and Holder are both GUILTY of sending weapons to mexico. Yes they are personally responsible and should be held accountable for the deaths!
Get off it. A sting attempt gone wrong and started by the Bush administration may have been ill conceived and mistakes made, but it will not be criminal.
This article just points to the ridiculous nature of our gun sales policies. When criminals use US as their source for weapons because we provide the deadliest weapons... that cannot be purchased in Mexico, then we've gone too far.
Our macho stick-up-our-a$$ love-affair with deadly weapons has GOT to change.
Only if the shoe fits you all call your self americans...... and yes its a huge problem in mexico and yes its up to mexico to do thier best and fix ALL that, But for SOME of you to sit there and blame the mexicans people for all the the problems that come said come from there. Remember Americans love drugs and will bying from somebody may it be brown,black or white americans selling this stuff in the united states to you or your friends or kids by an american. You folks act like ALL the americans are perfect no problems at all yeah right. Some folks act like they never do NOTHING wrong in the united states. If you want to talk about peolple or race or talk about hanging mexicans go stand in front of the mirror or go down the street yes the people you just past up while driving as they sell drugs on your street and STOP and start with them tell them something dont hide hide behind a computer board like a coward and be rasics. Mind you NOT all mexican have good values like trying to start a new life in the united states the land of the free etc...... trying to do the right and live ....... sit back and look at SOME SOME americans here in the states are robing the welfare systems and you dont say a darn thing like its ok with you to do that and they are all kinds of race doing it. If you do care....... about any of this and are a human being and want to help a human(mexican) people come up with pilot program thats help bring money in to somebodys pockets (americans) and do what the states did for others that want a new life here in the states a good life. Dont rip into people if you cant do any thing positive for and person(s). go back into your closet of hate.
Obama and his operation gone wrong. "Rocket Man" Obama and his minion Eric Holder and fully and totally responsible for this. The time line backs this without question. The sign shoud BE PLACED ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN so our idiot in chief could see it every day he is there. That would be about 6-9 days a month because of his golf and vacations.
LMarcT your wrong we DO NOT supply the deadliest weapons they get those from Central America, China or Russia or the middle east. Unless you mean the full auto's we sent to the Mexican military who couldn't keep there own people and let them defect to the drug lords WITH there govt. issued weapons. No licensed dealer in the U.S. would risk years in prison and the loss of there very expensive and hard to get FFL by knowingly selling to straw purchasers. I live in Utah which according to the Brady center is the worst state in the U.S. for gun control and I don't have a full automatic. (wish I could afford one and had the time to do all the required paperwork) Here's a NEW IDEA " CLOSE THE BORDER" no more drugs and illegals crossing North bound, No more guns (authorized by Eric Holder) going South !!! I go through more security to enter a court building for jury duty than crossing at Juarez either direction. At least as of 8 years ago. (The last time I crossed at Juarez or Nogales).
And just how easy is it to legally buy a gun? Last time I checked there was a waiting period of several days and also a background check to make sure you did not have a criminal record. If you want to discuss how easy it is to illegally buy a gun, then you cannot pass enough laws to stop that, for the simple fact that it is being done illegally already.
Not all illegal aliens are from Mexico. There are plenty of illegal aliens that come here with a tourist visa and never leave.
While this is true, according to the Department of Homeland Security, over 50% of the illegal aliens in the United States are from Mexico. So while Mexico is not the only country to have illegal aliens in this country, they are the majority of the problem.
Supply and demand. Americans demand drugs and cheap labor so Mexico provides both with their supply. Mexico demands guns to support and defend its drug business so America supplies them. This is a heart warming story of basic capitalism. Most of this trade is illegal but what do laws have to do with anything when big money is to be made. It never stopped a politician so why should it stop normal Americans?
I have nothing to say about the people who think this just started with Obama. They have their own illusions to deal with.
Please explain how OBAMA is responsible for the flow of weapons to Mexico? You mean, the day he was elected in the White House is the day weapons started flowing to Mexico? You whiners and complains crack me up. You point the finger of blame on ONE Person, and forget that our government has 3 branches of Government. You forget that Congress has the ability to pass laws that could STOP the flow of weapons to Mexico. If Obama did work with Congress to pass a law or he used executive authority, you would whine and complain about that as well.
Lastly, the funniest thing of all, is you love to whine and complain but offer no solution of your own. That's like a little child on the playground saying "she took my barbie".
Project Gun Runner was started in Texas then went National under President Bush. It changed to Fast & Furious under President Obama. It was a sting operation that had good results. But like any high-risk, dangerous operation, things can and did go wrong. The childish comments from those that want to hate President Obama are just that - childish and hateful with no sound judgement.
This is the same Calderon who criticized Arizona's new immigration law, while at the same time forgetting that Mexico has the toughest immigration laws in the Western Hemisphere?
Look up this article on your favorite search engine:
Mexico’s Immigration Law by J. Michael Waller
Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us.
That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the US look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:
in the country legally;
have the means to sustain themselves economically;
not destined to be burdens on society;
of economic and social benefit to society;
of good character and have no criminal records; and
contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that:
Immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens – and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, legal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.
It is an interesting law – and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.
We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)
Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)
Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity.
(Articles 85 and 86)
A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.
Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says:
“A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)
Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)
Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration preaching is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States. Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.
Oh, and all you right-wingers who keep trying to blame the President and the Attorney General need to check your facts. Operation Fast and Furious started in the Bush II Administration.
How about pointing the finger at Dubya Shrub and Halliburton Honey?
Seal the borders, crack down hard on drugs coming into the US, and let them deal with the problem on their own. It's time to stop being the police for the rest of the world. I understand that the US demand for drugs doesn't help their situation so by all means we should help them by dealing with that problem in our own country. As far as going to war with these cartels, no thanks. Our tax dollars have much more to do right now.
The cartels will get their guns from anywhere they please..With more cashflow than their own Government Felipe can put up as many signs as he wants, they also hold Ak-47..Mexico a very Violent race will cut your head off, your tongue out, cut into pieces and not think twice..
Calderon really has some nerve. It is his on people that are smuggling the guns into Mexico. In addition, the worst of the weapons, i.e. the fully automatic assault weapons, are not coming from the US. They are coming in from Central and South America. It is near impossible for a civilian to buy a fully automatic weapon in the US.
In addition, we should put up a sign that says no more illegals and no more drugs. Calderon should clean up his own house before he goes around trying to criticize the US.
Obama and Holders Fast N Foolish was a modified concoction of Bush's "Wide Receiver" sting program except it went a lot further and was poorly planned and executed.
Bush's "Wider Receiver" program gave direct notice to the Mexican authorities so that they could try to track the guns as they crossed the border. Bush officials learned that this program may in fact be dangerous as some weapons could get across the border past Mexican authorities so they wisely stopped it.
Obama and Holder were clueless as usual being too focused on the political gain aspects of it and screwed it up royally. Bush at least had the sense to realize the dangers weren't worth the risk.
One big difference between the Bush administration's gun walking scheme and obama's- Bush's program put trackers on all the weapons, obama's did not.
This exemplifies a big flaw in the obama administration- they come up or copy ideas except they fail to go from step one to step two. I mean seriously, how did Holder plan to track the guns? The way it's been happening -they're found at murder scenes?
Put your money where your mouth is, flock of cowards. Sure, go put up a sign, a billboard, hell rent some skywriting. Just do something other than complaining and blaming.
Tell you what I'll be Cheech and you be Chong for a minute ? See long ago there were drugs without violence..So you will now blame the US for how the Cartels operate is crazy..They are at War amongst themselves.
I am so ashamed that Obama and Holder are both GUILTY of sending weapons to mexico. Yes they are personally responsible and should be held accountable for the deaths!
I find it ironic that the guy with a Ronald Reagan avatar pic is saying something like this.
If all these automatic weapons are coming in from the US. They have to be coming from the US government. With few exceptions, have you heard of Automatic weapons being used in crimes in the US? If they were all that easy to get, wouldn't all the criminals in the US be using them?
Yes it is legal to own an automatic weapon in the US, but the cost, paperwork and scrutiny are very great.
Violent criminals are being pursued by the authorities. To avoid capture, they escape from Mexico into the United States...
Nah, let's stick with reality. Violent criminals USUALLY escape from the U.S. into MEXICO to avoid capture.
C'mon. You gentle folks on the RIGHT know better. You've watched enough Westerns. Or does the region of your brain that controls xenophobia automatically override all sense of history?
Give it a rest.
I mean, "JS in SD should pick up a book, occasionally.
1. Mexico's Cartels are feeding the insatiable appetite for drugs that THIS country has.
2. It is WAY too easy to buy fully automatic weapons in the U.S. and Teapublicans are trying to make it even easier.
A simple google search, dude. You have a computer. And don't just search your usual "reliable" sources. Do a real search.
..."Calderon should clean up his own house before he goes around trying to criticize the US."....
Every time the Left tries to enact meaningful legislation, the Right's answer is, Mexicans are dirty.
Get off it. A sting attempt gone wrong and started by the Bush administration may have been ill conceived and mistakes made, but it will not be criminal.
This article just points to the ridiculous nature of our gun sales (and enforcement) policies. When criminals use US as their source for weapons because we provide the (some of the) deadliest (and easiest to obtain) weapons... that cannot be purchased in Mexico, then we've gone too far.
Our macho stick-up-our-a$$ love-affair with deadly weapons has GOT to change.
() indicates change to post.
Collapse again if you wish, but we need to grow up and rid ourselves of our gun fetish.
Bush may have started the gun sting but odumbo and holder are the ones responsible for the EPIC FAIL of the sting. Mexico should POLICE its own borders instead of expecting us to police it for them.
You blame Obama and then say Mexico should police it's own borders. Which means the federal government (sorry, its not just Obama that makes up our government), should do nothing?
LMarc..."A sting attempt gone wrong and started by the Bush administration may have been ill conceived and mistakes made,..."
Under Bush the feds always knew where the guns were. Under Obama, the feds lost track of them and they fell into the drug lords hands.
Fair enough to say it got out of hand under Obama, but you know for a fact if the roles were reversed, it had started under a Democrat and got out of hand under a republican, that the liberals would be foaming at the mouth and wanting heads to roll.
Even the fact that the government 'thought' they could succeed in tracking the drug cartels by selling automatic weapons to them (The Fast and Furious Scandal) says how stupid the government really is. And for Attorney General Eric Holder to lie about it only makes the situation worse.
There is an amusing side to this and that is, despite tons of proof to the contrary, millions of people in the U.S. still think a bigger government is better.
It would be nice to put up a sign pointing towards Mexico saying 'No more illeagals'. But the US representative from W. Texas (Reyes-D) would say that isn't legal or that it isn't right. In New Mexico the democrat majority run state senate says it's ok for illegals to get drivers license. There lies the BIG problem.
I would gladly accept every hard working immigrant from Mexico that wants to come here in exchange for all the bigots spouting lies about them in the US.
At least the immigrants work hard and don't complain. The bigots are too busy looking for a free ride, special privileges, and destruction of the Constitution and our American way of life to be worth keeping.
¡Amigos míos! O'bama desea ejecutar a todos fuera de la ciudad! No crea su retórica. No creo que las suites de la ley Obtuvo en contra de dos estados del sur! Corrió las armas en sus comunidades para promover el caos en su país.
America's appetite for illegal drugs is responsible for the deaths of 35,000 Mexicans.
Unauthorized immigrants (who come from all over the world, not just Mexico) are responsible for imprving the American economy, creating jobs, and generating tax revenues. They should be granted citizenship, and our rules should be changed so that they no longer discriminate unfairly. If you can find a job here, you should be welcome.
How many of you would actually work that construction job for the cash they make lol. That's all I wanna know before you consider stripping the labor workforce XD
America's appetite for illegal drugs is responsible for the deaths of 35,000 Mexicans.
Your hippie parents would not appreciate a comment that blames them directly for our current illegal immigration problem. Getting high does not make them murderers!
How many of you would actually work that construction job for the cash they make lol. That's all I wanna know before you consider stripping the labor workforce XD
Well now that gets to the gist of the problem now doesnt it. Its not jobs that Americans wont do, as that dumb ass Bush used to suggest...they are jobs Americans wont do for the going wage those jobs pay. Not only is it not an affordable wage, but those Americans must also pay taxes on that artificially smaller wage. Did housing prices go down with this influx of illegal labor? No,,,they did not. You Dems should be furious at what is happening to the construction industry, and to that American that wants to work with his hands for a decent living.....that is now destroyed. White collar, you are next. Jobs are getting outsourced to a "cheaper" alternative. I would start contemplating what that really means if I were you.
The US does NOT want to end the drug war and does NOT want to stop illegal entry to the US. The illegals create cheap labor for our corrupt corporations and the drug war creates big profit for our military complex and plenty of high paying law enforcement jobs(cops, judges, prison guards, lawyers, etc.)
Tent - the answer right now is NONE. No American Consumers are willing to work the construction or agricultural jobs that immigrants - legal or otherwise - are willing to do.
If they were, the jobs would be filled, and we wouldn't have the 'illegals' problem, now, would we?
Of course there's the issue of the employers paying them in cash under the table at rates below minimum wage or other requirements.. but hey, that's just good old capitalism at work, right?
Fact is, these people come here and work. And American Consumers have it too easy and refuse to work, it's easier NOT to.
American addicts buy the drugs, creating a billion dollar industry that would not otherwise exist. American drug policy drives the industry underground and ensures that it will be run by criminals.
As much as you may seek to evade responsibility for your own, actions do have consequences.
Insulting my parents doesn't change matters; it merely reveals something about your character.
¡Amigos míos! O'bama desea ejecutar a todos fuera de la ciudad! No crea su retórica. No creo que las suites de la ley Obtuvo en contra de dos estados del sur! Corrió las armas en sus comunidades para promover el caos en su país.
Translation
My friends! O'bama want to run them all out of town! Do not believe his rhetoric.I do not think the lawsuits obtained against two southern states! He ran guns in their communities to promote chaos in his country.
Credibility = Zero. More moronic nonsense from Korny...
Mr. Calderon sure is one Mexican with cojones. He has blamed the drug problem on the U.S. before, now he's blaming the weapons problem on us also. He fails to see, or doesn't want to see, that the problem is his corrupt government , military and police.
I don't see what Mr. Hussein O'mama has to do with all this.
So all we need to do now is crush up a bunch of cocaine, meth, and pot. Then we make a giant billboard out of it that says "NO MORE DRUGS". Then we post armed guards around it to stop people from trying to snort it.
Pete, in spite of a massive disinformation campaign, immigrants do not receive
taxpayer funded health care, food assistance, and housing
By law, immigrants are not eligible for subsidized housing or food assistance.
It's a myth, promoted by organizations like the Center for Immigration Studies, FAIR, and NumbersUSA, all of which were founded by Nazi-admirer John Tanton, who has stated publicly that wants to the "genetics" policies of the Third Reich to be adopted in the United States, and he thinks immigration policy is the best place to start.
You can find information about taxpayer funded health care from the Rand Corporation; information about food assistance from the Government Accountability Office.
most of these guns come from drug deals addicts steal guns trade then for drugs and dealers pass them up the chain because they are just like cash on the black market
It's pretty simple, you don' just kick the Illegals out you ask yourself why do they wanna come here at all? Then you tackle the route of the issue, soak up the free labor I swear you won't get it cheaper from some other guy who feels entitled to that and higher pay for even less a quality in the job.
Common sense: "Pete, in spite of a massive disinformation campaign, immigrants do not receive taxpayer funded health care, food assistance, and housing By law, immigrants are not eligible for subsidized housing or food assistance."
Common, how about their anchor babies? Do they get anything? Do false green cards get services? Do hospitals kick them out? Schools?
I'm seriously considering starting up a donation fund for a sign that says "No more illegals" made out of old trucks/cases/bags used to transport drugs over the border. Mexico has a lot of nerve. Acting like it's 100 percent our fault that drug cartels operate inside their country. If they didn't have guns, they use something else.
I've said this on many other posts concerning this type of issue. But it's both countries fault for failing to secure the border and stop the drug/gun trade.
World's largest consumer of cocaine (shipped from Colombia through Mexico and the Caribbean), Colombian heroin, and Mexican heroin and marijuana; major consumer of ecstasy and Mexican methamphetamine; minor consumer of high-quality Southeast Asian heroin; illicit producer of cannabis, marijuana, depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, and methamphetamine; money-laundering center.
America's appetite for illegal drugs is responsible for the deaths of 35,000 Mexicans.
WRONG! It is the American war on drugs and drug prohibition that is the root cause of all the violence and deaths associated with illegal drug trafficking. Just like alcohol prohibition was responsible for the crime sprees in 20s/30s.
You blame the drug users incorrectly when the blame should be put on failed U.S. drug policies.
It's not the drug users...it's the drug laws.
If you support the continuation of the drug war then the blood of over 40,000 Mexicans is on your hands.
We'll be sure to stop weapons traffic just as soon as he stops human traffic !!
I can't take a thing this clown has to say seriously after the GARBAGE of him coming to OUR country and shaming us on our immigration policies when his own nation in fact has much stricter immigration policies than the U.S. El Presidente Felipe Calderon is a bad joke that will hopefully soon the hook from the Mexican people at the ballot box !!
The Fast and Furious Gun sales to the government of Mexico was started by the Bush administration....Obama and Holder have tried to pass a law restricting gun stores on the Mexican border to sell "no more than 2 semiautomatic rifles or "long guns" to individuals in a six week period of time", in an effort to stop massive gun sales to Mexican cartels......naturally, the NRA objects and has filed suit against Obama to stop the law so that precious gun store owners can continue the sales of unlimited quantities of semi-automatic weapons to whomever seeks one in such states with weak gun laws......red-blooded Americans who have small genitalia are objecting to the Obama regulation.
Under US Law illegals don't get benefits? Complete and utter BS.
Been to the projects layely? How about Obama's Aunt? She fled 2 federal deportation orders in Chicago and was found living for years here in Boston, getting welfare, public housing, medical etc.
How hard are they checking?
No mention of Fast and Furious in an article about Guns in Mexico? Completely slanted and biased.
And the attempt to blame Bush again is just pathetic.
The reason of having so many drugs coming into the US is because the poverty of all the Latin American countries forces them to come here -or sell drugs- Not all illegal aliens are from Mexico. There are plenty of illegal aliens that come here with a tourist visa and never leave.
True, but around 65% of all illegal aliens are Mexican nationals, and another 18% of them come from countries south of Mexico! Look it up!
If they want to keep US guns out of Mexico they should build a big fence and patrol the border. This is a two way street. The corruption of the Mexican government can't control the populus and they want to point the finger at someone else. They should be more concerned about the guns coming in from South America and other countries in the illegal arms trade than US guns coming over the border.
No US guns in Mexico, no illegal Mexican citizens in the US. If they can guaruntee the later, I would urge our polititians to ensure the former.
Remember- The Democrats gave Calderon a standing ovation when he spoke to Congress about the rights of the illegal aliens in our country. They need those potential Democrat voters. (notice how the left is fighting Voter ID-see the connection?).
This from the leader of a country that does not give birthright citizenship and has far stricter illegal immigration laws than our own.
Mr. Johhny - who's looking the other way on cheap labor? I don't hire illegals. Do you? How do you know baybb does? How dare you call people you know nothing about "hypocrites" on this issue.
You have no valid point to make other than to encourage other people to hate and discriminate against all people from Mexico in particular, and all Latinos and all immigrants in general.
Once here, unauthorized immigrants obey our laws to a far greater extent than the 'native-born' crowd, are far more likely to hold a paying job, far less likely to be on welfare, far less likely to receive medical care, but far more likely to pay for it when they do, pay more than their fair share in taxes, and CREATE jobs for US citizens. Unauthorized immigrants come from all over the world, entering all over the US. Many merely overstay valid visas.
Bigots, on the other hand, pit one group of Americans against another, blame all their problems on people who had nothing to do with creating those problems, make things worse by distracting attention away from REAL problems, and advocate for weakening the Constitution.
Once here, unauthorized immigrants obey our laws to a far greater extent than the 'native-born' crowd, are far more likely to hold a paying job, far less likely to be on welfare, far less likely to receive medical care, but far more likely to pay for it when they do, pay more than their fair share in taxes, and CREATE jobs for US citizens. Unauthorized immigrants come from all over the world, entering all over the US. Many merely overstay valid visas.
And this gives them some right to ignore the law and stay? This kind of thinking is a huge part of the problem and "commonsense" must be some sort of oxymoron with you as you display none in your comment. We cannot claim to be a nation of laws and allow this to continue. I don't care how you want to coat it to make it palatable. Wanting to see the laws enforced and these criminals (that's what we call lawbreakers) be punished by at the very least being returned to their point of origination does NOT make one a bigot. This is a REAL problem. What part of "illegal alien" got past you? It doesn't matter that in order to conceal their status as a criminal that they obey other laws. Give us a break.
People who do the same things you do everyday should not be considered 'criminals' with no right to exist. Working, paying taxes, going to school, driving a car; these things are not crimes if YOU do them. They should not be considered crimes when an immigrant does them.
I see hundreds of people break the law everyday on my way to work, and hundreds more on my way home. They routinely drive over the speed limit. How can we claim to be a "nation of laws" when we allow this to continue. And these people are repeat offenders.
Crossing a border one time without inspection is a misdemeanor civil violation. So is overstaying a visa.
People do those things for one reason and one reason only: under current rules, they would not be allowed in otherwise, because the social engineers (i.e., bigoted, incompetent political hacks) who wrote our current rules don't want too many brown people coming in. But if you're not brown or black or yellow, you automatically qualify for a 'diversity visa' lottery.
Current rules allow for entry of up to 5,000 unskilled laborers per year. Yet for the past 25 years, American businesses have hired an average of 400,000 to 500,000 foreign born unskilled laborers per year. The current rule is just plain STUPID.
Some of these people have been here for decades. Many have been here nearly their entire lives. They HAVE no other homes.
We haven't treated people this poorly since passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1965. It's unAmerican and unConstitutional.
STUPID laws, like those allowing slavery in the US or making it illegal for Jews to work in Nazi Germany, need to be changed, not enforced.
LAKE COUNTY, Ill. - An illegal alien from the Philippines was arrested Thursday morning on a felony complaint charging her with 17 counts related to voter fraud in Lake County. The state charges resulted from a joint investigation conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the Lake County State's Attorneys Office. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) also provided assistance.
Maria Azada, 53, of Grayslake, Ill., was arrested March 17 by ICE HSI agents and a Lake County State's Attorneys special investigator. Azada faces 17 felony counts in Lake County Circuit Court of perjury, mutilation of election materials, and tampering with voting machines in connection with illegal voting by a non-U.S. citizen.
The investigation began in February 2009 when Azada admitted to a USCIS officer during an interview for an immigration benefit that she had voted in an election. It is illegal for foreign nationals to vote in national or state elections in the United States.
A subsequent investigation revealed that Azada allegedly voted nine times in primary, general and consolidated elections between 2003 and 2009. According to the arrest warrant, Azada allegedly falsely claimed to be a U.S. citizen on two Illinois Voter Registration applications.
Labeling all Mexicans as "illegal" is bigotry, pure and simple.
Saying that all unauthorized immigrants are Mexican is also bigotry (not to mention incorrect).
The 'punishment' for speeding is payment of a fine. Not loss of livelihood, not splitting apart of family, not exile to a foreign country.
Driving without a license? The response is GET A LICENSE, show it to us, and then go about your business. If you ALLOW people a legal pathway, they will follow it. To DISALLOW a legal pathway merely because you think you dislike a certain ethnic group is bigotry.
I didn't see where Amused or Baybb labeled all Mexicans as illegals. That is pure conjecture on your part. Illegal is a descriptive word. Comparing speeding to ILLEGAL entry into the US is ludicrous at best. Speeding is an offense with a punishment for all residents who break traffic laws. Entering the US ILLEGALLY and deportation TO THEIR HOME nation is doled out to those that break our immigration laws. What do you tell the people who have waited years to get their chance to LEGALLY enter the US and start their pursuit of the American Dream. Here's another item to burst your bubble, they take jobs that US citizens will do as well as lowering wages in those trades. I live it, do you?
I agree that intrinsically tying Mexicans to illegal immigration is wrong however, we can't simply continue to ignore the issues that are quite literally shouting in our face as a nation.
The fact of the matter is, we have a critical problem with illegal immigration in the United States that mostly pertains to Mexican nationals. This country has done far more to open it's borders to Mexican immigration requests than any other nation has done in contemporary history.
Part of immigration control is the realization that:
Those who would cross illegally are more likely to be criminal and violent offenders
Limitations on the volume of immigrants is not meant to isolate our nation, but to assist in the stabilization of matters in their home country
Illegal immigration poses enormous problems for the host nation given that, we cannot expect to create new jobs for them, provide adequate housing, provide expectations that they abide by our laws, and provide proper civic education.
Crossing a border is a criminal offense...it's not that breaking the speed limit is what gets the gears going, it's that they illegally crossed our borders (or did not leave at the expiration of their granted stay) and have been identified. If you or I broke the law and evaded civil or criminal action, you had better bet that you'd land in jail/prison on a warrant that's been out for your arrest (I forgot to pay a parking ticket and got a night in jail after getting pulled over).
Mexico's Calderon spends a lot of time blaming Americans for the problems in his nation, but neglects to state the obvious...that his own citizens have been making a mass exodus across our borders for more almost 100 years, leaving only a fraction of their citizenry to battle the drug cartels and violent gangs.
Keep in mind, it often takes a majority to win a battle against a powerful enemy. The drug cartels weren't always drug cartels, they have long been violent gangs and outlaws who oppressed the Mexican people. Mexico isn't unique for having this problem, our nation experienced these woes for hundreds of years, as settlement to the West and South occurred. Our pioneers didn't give up and migrate to Canada en masse, but instead built communities to protect themselves. It's a fact of life...pack animals (including humans) need larger and stronger communities to fight the fringe.
Mexico has done absolutely NOTHING to stop the tidal wave of expatriation that is making their country suffer. Mexico lacks the man power and will to stop the crime and violence that they clearly suffer, and will not be able to until they begin protecting their own borders.
Anyway, I am getting sick of this whole blame the drug user argument. Americans may be creating the need, but the dealer is the one perpetuating it. In this country, we prosecute both drug use and drug distribution, and guess which one gets more penalties?
I am a liberal blue-to-the-teeth gay man, but even I can see when our platform is getting a bit ridiculous!
they create a profit larger than what will last forever..
so much profit that moving arms to nations and countries as Mexico, is not going to stop.
People, realize that there isnt just one side who is guilty. you can blame Mexico, you can blame America, you can point fingers at your friendly neighborhood drug dealer..but in the end, its just the way the world is.. cold..
nothings going to change, at least not for the good.
theres only one who can judge, the one seated on the throne.
Commonsense, the only one who said this is all about Mexicans is you. You won't find that in my post. I think my term was a more generic "illegal alien." Let me address your rather irrational retort.
People who do the same things you do everyday should not be considered 'criminals' with no right to exist. Working, paying taxes, going to school, driving a car; these things are not crimes if YOU do them. They should not be considered crimes when an immigrant does them.
If that immigrant is here against the law, then yes, they are criminals. You may not like it, but there is a law there and it has been violated, they are criminal. Not any gray area there for you to exploit with your extremism.
I see hundreds of people break the law everyday on my way to work, and hundreds more on my way home. They routinely drive over the speed limit. How can we claim to be a "nation of laws" when we allow this to continue. And these people are repeat offenders.
We do not, we have active police officers who enforce traffic laws. If you get caught, you pay the consequences. We do not have enough police to catch everyone. The same applies to the border, we do not have enough enforcement present. Because someone broke the law and got away with it does not lend excuse to another to do the same thing. What kind of logic is that?
People do those things for one reason and one reason only: under current rules, they would not be allowed in otherwise
Their reason does not matter. It is against the law. It is against the law becausee for a variety of reasons the country can only accept so many newcomers in a year without damaging the infrastructure. Look around you to see the results of ignoring the law. Our social safety net would be more than adaquate and sustainable if it were not paying for people who viloated laws to get here. Common sense, think about it with your emotional blinders off.
Current rules allow for entry of up to 5,000 unskilled laborers per year. Yet for the past 25 years, American businesses have hired an average of 400,000 to 500,000 foreign born unskilled laborers per year. The current rule is just plain STUPID.
Wrong again. What is just plain stupid is being so greedy that you are unwilling to pay someone a family livable wage to do a job. What is just plain stupid is not being willing to pay a reasonable price for an item so that a business can pay the family livable wage. What is just plain stupid is cutting your own throat and realizing you are doing it.
Some of these people have been here for decades. Many have been here nearly their entire lives. They HAVE no other homes.
They should have spent some time over the "decades" trying to get right instead of trying to hide. They know they broke the law, they know they could get caught, they know they could be sent back, they rolled the dice.
This sounds harsh to you because for some reason you think our borders can be open and anyone can just waltz right in, that it will have no effect on the people already here who are trying to create and manage a society. You have no respect for the property or the work of others. Dude I am as liberal as it gets on a lot of issues, but you post sounds like one giant excuse for people who really do think life is free and that co-opting the work of others is just fine. No sale.
In 1847, the USA invaded Mexico in an unjust,illegal war, which noted Republican Abraham Lincoln protested, and was called a "traitor" by his opponents. The real purpose of this war was to obtain more land for the USA which could be declared as "Slave-owning States". The US President concocted ( lied) about a non-existent border crossing of a Mexican Army unit into the USA....the President then ordered the US Army to "pursue" the Mexican Army, which really meant to Attack Mexico, which was a peaceful nation.
Thousands of innocent Mexicans were killed by the US Army and 40% of Mexico was stolen from that nation....Arizona,parts of New Mexico,California and Nevada.....
In 1847, the USA invaded Mexico in an unjust,illegal war, which noted Republican Abraham Lincoln protested, and was called a "traitor" by his opponents. The real purpose of this war was to obtain more land for the USA which could be declared as "Slave-owning States". The US President concocted ( lied) about a non-existent border crossing of a Mexican Army unit into the USA....the President then ordered the US Army to "pursue" the Mexican Army, which really meant to Attack Mexico, which was a peaceful nation.
Oh my God, here we go:
Slave Owning States was a term applied to the states in the union at or south of the border who had laws in support of slavery. The western states that were created through the Mexican cession weren't even states until after the Emancipation Proclamation with the exception of California, which played an extremely important but little known role in the victory of union forces over cessation states. Point being, the western states had nothing to do with slavery except for under Mexican rule. FAIL.
The Mexican-American war really had it's roots in the Texas Revolution, where Mexico refused to abide by the terms of the cessation of Texas following the revolt, and attacked that sovereign nation. The United States had granted protection to the newly-formed Texas Republic and was as a result pulled into a war against Mexico.
Mexico has never been a peaceful nation, not under Spanish rule, and not under Mexican rule. Mexico has bred outlaws since the day it was established. You want someone to blame for the problems in Mexico? Blame the Spanish!
Thousands of innocent Mexicans were killed by the US Army and 40% of Mexico was stolen from that nation....Arizona,parts of New Mexico,California and Nevada
FYI -- California wasn't stolen from Mexico...it was a sovereign nation that won it's independence from Mexico before the Mexican-American War ever began. Read a history book, why don't you!!
Millions of innocent people have been raped and murdered within the borders of Mexico due to it's apparent disinterest in quashing lawlessness long before and after the United States forced the purchase of the territory. Mexican soldiers brutalized people living within those territories and American citizens passing through to California.
You reap what you sow..........
So true, oh so very much true. Mexico has nobody to blame for it's problems but itself.
Since this will more than likely turn into a bunch of 2nd Amendment brouhaha... Let's start with this:
Now if you truly, absolutely, without any other interpretation believe in the 2nd Amendment; then felons and murderers' rights to own a gun should NOT be infringed, either. But they are. So where's our patriotism towards upholding their rights? Yeah... thought so...
Now, don't get me wrong! It is NOT the self-respecting, took a gun safety class, registered gun owner, moral citizen that I'm worried about. It's the large majority of 'other' gun owners. And since there are so many, it's obvious proof that there are too many Americans who cannot handle the freedoms that they're given. Very simply put, a gun in their hands makes a target out of you and me. But alas, Pro-2nd Amendment activists will not take the necessary responsibilities to prevent such people from getting guns in fear of selfishly losing their freedoms as well. SIGH, what's one to do then?
And last but NOT least; someone will sooner or later say, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people." I really hate such juvenile, pointless, impotent arguments. Plain and simple, guns help people kill people more easily. Sure, one could kill someone with a wet noodle if they try hard enough... but is that really a valid argument? No.
ChrisWanker, the overwhelming majority of gun homicides in the U.S. are perpetrated by people who already have felony convictions. They chose to give up their 2nd amendment rights when they chose to be felons, just like they gave up their right to vote. Your "point" is juvenile and impotent.
With that philosophy, Better get rid of the alcohol people drink so they cannot get drunk and drive and kill people with their car. Oh, Might as well ban the cars also.
Unless you're referring to those who have felony convictions as not "people", I don't understand what you mean.
Now, I know that there are 'other' laws and articles that amend the amendments, which is only more government intervention, but let's take a look at the part I'm stressing here:
...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
So, I guess you're going to have to elaborate on why my "point" is juvenile and impotent. Seriously! Please elaborate!!!
@YellaHammer,
I suggest nothing. Just stating an opinion and a couple facts.
@Marcm,
And while we're at it, let's get rid of wet noodles, too! Sheesh!!!
Where the hell did you come up with felons rights to possess a weapon of any kind. The NRA DOES NOT advocate that criminals should be allowed weapons. The NRA supports the 2nd amendment rights of those LAW ABIDING citizens only. You should learn cognitive reading... It's people like you that cause problems for law abiding citizens. Enforce the gun laws on the books today and stop being pussies about it.
Uh, nice name? And even nicer avatar of a big white guy punching a little black guy in the face... No racial stuff going on there!!!
Oh, and maybe you should learn some cognitive reading while you're at it as well. I am plain and simply pointing out the fundamental basis of the 2nd Amendment. And nothing beyond that. The only part where I mention anything like that NRA is where I state that they won't do anything because they are "in fear of selfishly losing their freedoms as well." Not that they advocate for criminals to possess guns. In fact, I stated quite the opposite.
So where's our patriotism towards upholding their rights? Yeah... thought so...
Meaning that no one is upholding their rights. You know what...? Never mind, you're obviously a waste of [anyone's] time!
My company is working on biometric locks that would be mounted on the gun itself. when a gun is purchased the dealer programs the fingerprint keypad to accept it's owners fingerprint and maybe the souse's if they are getting the gun for protection. If a child gets hold of it the keypad won't recognize their fingerprint and it won't fire. If someone breaks in and steals your gun it won't fire either.
Anyone buying a gun through private party ads will have to take the firearm to a licensed registered certified dealer or to the police station to have the biometric lock programmed to accept the fingerprint of the new owner. Proof of purchase required. Any attempts to circumvent the biometric lock will render the gun inoperable.
It sounds like a good idea to us. Anyone got an opinion, yea or nay?
Which is why I'm worried about them. Better gun-control does not turn "law-abiding citizens" into prey! Where do you get that? A law-abiding citizen can "legally" purchase a gun to protect them self.
Photobiker - I'm sure your statistics are comforting to all those who were killed by guns not wielded by felons. If I am shot, I sure hope it is by someone who does not have a criminal record. (I was almost killed by my father-in-law, a law abiding citizen who got real nervous when I had trouble opening the door one night with the new key he had given me). You may want to further explore your statistics and check out just who is shooting who. There are a lot of felons shooting other felons out there. So Chris is really right. If I am a felon living in a felony ridden neighborhood, then do you really expect me not to have a weapon? And what about non-violent felons, especially all those white-collar crime guys? They are a lot less violent than a lot of people who legally have weapons?
Chris...I understand exactly what you're trying to say. And if the world were black and white, it would apply. But the world is shades of gray and we're not functioning in absolutes.
"Better gun-control does not turn "law-abiding citizens" into prey!"
New York City has gun control laws so strict they are a de facto ban on guns. Hopefully you won't, but if you ever have a criminal stick a gun in your face when you're totally defenseless, you will understand the concept of "prey" in absolute terms. Just ask someone who has had the experience.
@YellaHammer If it can be programmed it can be hacked criminals will allways have guns destroy every gun on the planet today and tomarow the will make thier own.
Chris, I agree with what you say about everyone has a right to defend themselves, wether they be a felon or not. Most people forget that once you have served your time you have payed your debt to society. As for guns you all are missing the big picture here. The second amendmet goes futher then just owning a gun. If my ememy has a big gun, I want a bigger one if he has a tank, I want a bigger one. The second amendment is about protecting yourself period. Even and mostly from your own government. That is why it is second only to freedom of speech. And for those who think it is about hunting, you are wrong. That is what the government and the media want you to think.
How about punish people who send the weapons or drugs over the boarder with very harsh felony's and if your concerned with illegals going over the border punish the Companies that hire them. Serious companies that hire illegals should be put out of business plain and simple.
good point outback, a tour of any prison museum will show you what paraphenelia has been confiscated, knives, home-made guns, darts, dice machines. The criminals will not be without weapons if they can. Outlawing guns to stop those who wish to defend themselves is truly a moronic idea. (Think Middle East- and the weapon of choice- suicide bombs.) Take away one, another weapon pops up. Take away all weapons, expect hammers, and wrenches to be used, etc. etc.
ChrisWanker is a troll, c'mon people. If he really wanted to live in a place where everybody including murderers and rapist and so forth can have firearms, then he would live in MEXICO!
your argument about treating felons the same under the 2nd amendment would mean you feel they should not be banned from voting either.
I believe in ALL the rights given me under the Constitution. I and all members of my family served defending those rights. Arguing the felon card is a red herring. The felon gave up those rights by violating the other half of having rights and that is exercising them RESPONSIBLY.
There are already restrictions on who can own a gun. Stricter than who can own a car. Both however are often ignored or bypassed by CRIMINALS.
MY issue with the whole gun control thing is that the anti gun folks want a TOTAL and complete ban. They parade out one thing then start adding more and more restrictions on who and where and what type can be owned.
Many anti gun folks don't even have a clue what they are speaking of when they start listing guns to restrict. This article is a prime example where the Mexican president is quoted as saying AUTOMATIC rifles and handguns. I am by no means an expert but I am not aware of any automatic pistol available in the USA without FFL. I am guessing he is referring to the MAC-10 and the like. Same with automatic rifles.
AMANDA, Good in concept but what if I'm at the range and my son or the guy next to me wants to try my Kimber before he goes out and spends $1400 on one of his own. maybe if the owner could have a timed over ride or something and if it was reliable 1000% of the time so I never had a break-in and my own gun wouldn't fire because I had to shoot left handed or something. I can't see a situation where I'd risk my life or that of my family on one.
We used to have institutions that taught people about the rights and responsabilities of being a citizen of this country instead of just how to pass a stupid test. The law-abiding but irresponsable gun owner is a public education problem.
As for Mexico: If anything they need more guns. Restricting guns to only criminals obviously hasn't been working for them. Even if the cartels don't get the guns from the US, they have plenty of other sources. We only hear about the guns that come from here.
@AMANDA,good concept,but criminals will find a way around it.a gun is a simple mechanism,it can be broken down and tweaked by almost anyone with some mechanical ability.
Amanda-2017567 - What your company is doing is a great concept. I hope that it's something that can come to the market and help. Unfortunately, it can't address the many guns left in the world that will not have this technology.
scott in salt lake - Maybe the safety feature will be like an adjustable seat in a car. You can have up to 3 or 4 settings. If you are the range, and a stranger wants to you use your gun and test it out, you could 'temporarily' authorize him to use it, and then erase it. Sounds feasible to me.
Mr Wanker, This is a statement to support OUR Constitution, NOT mexico's, this is the gist of the story I believe, not Felons, why 'guns' kill (I own several and they have NEVER opened the safe, jumped out, ran from the house and shot someone!) In your argument, cigarettes kill many more than guns each year, as does cancer (typically caused by an unhealthy use of something), etc. So, with all of you inane ramblings, what is your solution, I am suure that the sitting Government is waiting with bated breath for it.
Contrary to the belief of many of our fellow citizens, the purpose of the United States Constitution is not to grant us rights. Our rights, given to us by our Creator, are inalienable. The purpose of the Constitution is to limit the powers of the federal government. Look at the language of the Bill of Rights. It is chock full of “shall not” and “shall make no;” all of which refer to the United States government.
Our explicit rights, that is, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are contingent wholly upon our implicit right: the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The intent of the Second Amendment is to preserve and guarantee, not grant, a pre-existing right; again, the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
Arms, by which we mean guns, allow the free citizen to exercise self-defense; to protect one’s self from predators of various stripes, be they criminal malefactors or rapacious government. St. George Tucker—Revolutionary War officer and later U.S. District Judge—in his Blackstone’s Commentaries of 1803 wrote that “the right of self-defense is the first law of nature.”
The Fourth Amendment—“The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizure, shall not be violated”—would be hollow prose without the Second Amendment to give it teeth. This concept was recognized very early by the Framers. Noah Webster wrote in 1787,
“Before any standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States…[The people] will instantly inspire the inclination to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.”
This sentiment was expressed best, perhaps, by one of Virginia’s favorite sons. In 1788, Patrick Henry wrote, “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches this jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.”
Certainly guns have enormous recreational uses and add hugely to the sporting life of our people. But the intent of the Framers was not to safeguard the rights of target shooters and duck hunters. It was to preserve our freedoms from an aggressive government. Keep in mind that the Framers were insurrectionists. They were well acquainted with the realities of oppressive rule and were determined to give the citizens of this republic the tools necessary to preserve and protect their freedoms.
The Constitution is a document of unique concepts and principles. But it will provide the framework for the Rule of Law in this country only so long as we remain an armed citizenry and do not allow ourselves to become unarmed serfs.
Very true. However, every time there is an article about "guns" and "America" on MSNBC.com pro-2nd Amendment activists come out in full force. I honestly decided that being the first to post something somewhat "gray" about the topic would be more interesting than reading about some guy saying, "You can take my guns from my cold dead hands". Anyway, interesting read you have there.
Sounds like Obama stimulus money at work. Until Congress passes a law mandating their use or Obama issues another executive order circumventing the wishes of the American people, they will never fly.
Get your resume in order. Your company may be the next Solyndra.
ChrisWanker - I live in NJ, one of the most liberal states in the country with some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Guess who has all the weapons? Ding ding ding. Yes, that would be the criminals. The liberals have done a FINE job here. Sheesh.
The type systems your company is working has existed for years. Unfortunately as was proven the are full of issues. As some mentioned what if I need to shoot with the other hand? What if for some reason the fingerprint that is programmed into the weapon is unreadable (i.e. I'm wearing a bandaid) and I NEED the weapon in a life or death situation (yep, been there)? Even agencies like BATF have stated time and time again that such a system is not only unsastainable, but too costly and problematic to be viable. So IF your company is indeed working on such a system, they either have more money than they know what to do with, or they are purposly wasting it. Which is it?
I would just like to add to what Dbachrach said. If you are fighting for your life and have blood on your finger when you finally fight your way to the gun it would not work because your fingerprint would be unreadable. Or if I happen to be eating Doritos at the time they busted in. Or if I have driving gloves on in the winter when someone tries to carjack me. So I have to agree that it is a total waste of money.
So... You're saying that not one law abiding citizen has a firearm? Because that's how I'm reading your statement. Try not to be so finite.
@Dbachrach and 1wizard,
Technicalities. I'm certain it's just like the trigger locks that people can already buy. You can leave them on and hope that there's never going to be a situation where you find yourself fumbling for the key... or leave it off and hope that no one ever steals your gun and/or grabs it and uses it on you.
However, one thing that trigger locks have proven is that they work against accidents and theft.
When will people stop taking the 2nd out of context. The right exists "as part of a well regulated militia" it does NOT apply (when taken verbatim) to arbitrary individuals without supervision (by the militia). Back in the 1700's 1800's most of the non-hunting guns in "Civilized" areas were kept in local armories and not in the individual's possession. If the militia / local goverment decided there was sufficient risk, they would authorisze access the guns.
Everyone is acting like the only people who sell guns are private citizens or small arms dealers, and yes it would be hard for them to sell fully-auto weapons, but the weapons contractors have an overstock of military style weapons and as we saw throughout the 80's and 90's they have no qualms about selling them to any 3rd world dictator who has the money to buy them. During the 80's some of our largest exports to Africa and Central America were automatic weapons, rocket launchers, grenades, chemical weapons, etc.
You have a "yea" from me! Now the only problem is making it the law for ALL guns to have them.
It would start out being safety option. it would be up to a manufacturer to decide if they want to add the technology, but it would fall under 'gun lock' laws--instead of buying a separate lock for the gun there would be one built in. We think, the industry as a whole would welcome something of this sort, and those who are most in favor would be those who have young children in the house. We've all heard the stories about kids getting hold of Dad's gun and shooting themselves accidentally--this would eliminate the possibility of it.
Cassie said:
Amanda, that sounds wonderful.
We thought so to It' still in design stages but we're hopeful.
outback said:
If it can be programmed it can be hacked criminals will allways have guns destroy every gun on the planet today and tomarow the will make thier own.
spiceman said:
good concept,but criminals will find a way around it.a gun is a simple mechanism,it can be broken down and tweaked by almost anyone with some mechanical ability.
We're looking at tying the lock into the gun's actual mechanics so that any tampering renders the gun inoperable.
It's about time said:
What your company is doing is a great concept. I hope that it's something that can come to the market and help. Unfortunately, it can't address the many guns left in the world that will not have this technology.
The gun will have to be built with the biometric lock on it, it can't be added as an aftermarket accessory or option, but we're also going to suggest manufacturers offer a 'trade in' option when we complete design and testing and pitch the technology to them. You trade in your old one, get a hefty discount on a new one with the biometric lock on it.
That being said, yes, anything made by man can be hacked/broken by another. Nothing is foolproof. But if you think about it, it will get rid of a lot of the 'accidental' shootings--the kids who accidentally shoot themselves while playing with Dad's gun, the kid who takes it to school planning to shoot up the school and then the gun doesn't work. Those kids, and the majority of small-time criminals out there (the drug addict looking for something to hold up a dealer, the average burglar breaking into a house) isn't going to have that technical know-how. It's not going to eliminate accidents like Giants player Plaxico Burress shooting himself in the leg.
BigE said:
Sounds like Obama stimulus money at work. Until Congress passes a law mandating their use or Obama issues another executive order circumventing the wishes of the American people, they will never fly. Get your resume in order. Your company may be the next Solyndra.
It's actually not stimulus, it's partially funded under Homeland Security's $98 billion budget.
They've funded development of portable DNA analyzers (which they are planning to use at airports and border checkpoints)
They've funded development of WAASS (Wide Area Aerial Surveillance) systems that can be fitted to drones in US airspace to conduct search-and-rescue in remote ares, aerial surveillance of the borders, and tracking criminals in hotspot areas throughout the US.
They've funded development of FAST (Future Attribute Screening Technology) and are currently testing it in an undisclosed area of the Northeast. Its a scanner that will measure a person's perspiration, breathing, pulse and eye movement to predict if the person will commit a crime. It was developed primarily for use in airports to scan fliers for anyone about to commit a terrorist attack or other crime--anyone the system deems a possible terrorist threat can be apprehended by TSA/DHS before they even get on a plane. Initial results show the scanner has 70% accuracy in detecting signs of nervousness in test subjects who were instructed to act (or not) in a nervous fashion.
Dbachrach said:
The type systems your company is working has existed for years. Unfortunately as was proven the are full of issues. As some mentioned what if I need to shoot with the other hand?
The biometric lock can be programmed for any finger of either hand (or multiple fingers of each hand. All ten if you want.
Technicalities? I would say problem...big problem...when your firearm doesn't go off when you want it or need it. I'd hate to be the firearms manufacturer on the sh*t end of a wrongful death suit because someone got killed trying to defend himself & the gun would not go off.
Technology cannot solve everything. You still have good vs. evil & common sense vs. stupidity.
If you are fighting for your life and have blood on your finger when you finally fight your way to the gun it would not work because your fingerprint would be unreadable.
When is the average citizen going to be 'fighting for your life'? I live in a bad neighborhood (automatic weapons in a driveby shooting four years ago Christmas night, ended with bullet holes in the front door) and I never had to use mine (inherited my Dad's Vietnam piece, a S&W model 39) I've actually used my swords more often than the gun. It's not going to be for military or law enforcement weapons, it'll be mainly for the civilian population.
Technology cannot solve everything. You still have good vs. evil & common sense vs. stupidity.
No, it's not going to solve everything. This technology is being developed for the average citizen who would like a firearm around the house but wants to make sure that their child doesn't accidentally shoot themselves or their friend with it, the average burglar, or the messed up kid with psych problem who takes Dad's gun to school with the intent of shooting their classmate.
If you're holding a gun on someone and that someone gets it away from you and tries to shoot you with your own gun it won't work--they aren't going to have time to hook a computer up to the gun and find the password to unlock the coding and circumvent the lock, nor are they going to have the time to try and reprogram it.
And if your kid can hook it up to the home computer and break the programming, that kid has too much time on his hands and YOU need to do a better job of securing it from him. AND he'd better be applying for a job because people pay big money for those kinds of skills!
I would have to say no to what your company is doing, maybe for the military it would be a great idea, so that our enemies could not use our weapons against us, me being an 11B and seeing what happens out there this would come in handy. But concerning civilians, that would be a big no. My reasons are not only do you have to do a background check via state and federal so make sure you can own a firearm, in a way it allows the government to know you have a firearm, yes it doesn't state what you are buying as long as it's not fully auto, but to do what your company is developing, would not only allow the governments to know you own a firearm but what kind and how many. The point to that freedom is, when and if the government becomes the enemy of the people, the people will be able to defend and rid themselves of their enemy. But what would stop the govenment from coming to your household and confiscating your weapons, they would have your address your name, what you own, etc... Also with the way technology develops so fast and I now working in the technology field and seeing it first hand, I can see they would install a kill switch to your device on the firearms, so that remotely they can cause your weapons to become inoperable and now you have become defenseless, and to start it off it would be brought to a company like yours to create an additional component on your device to do this, and their reason would be something like this if it was allowed to pass. "We are applying a kill switch to all weapons biometric locks, so incase a weapon is used in a crime and we can identify it we can kill it." But hey I'm just one man and his opinion like everyone else. It's up to the person to take personal responsibilty and know what is wrong or right. Oh yeah if your company comes out with this lock and it gets passed to be used, could you please let me know so that I can buy a few more firearms that would fall under the grandfather clause. Thanks
You'll have to forgive because I'm on the verge of senior citizenry, therefore I'm old-school.
My father (ex-Korean vet) taught me how to handle firearms at an early age. There were firearms all around, with no locks, and ammunition available, also unlocked. There was a loaded 1911 in his bedroom closet. I could handle them with his supervision. I knew better that to mess with them by myself as surely I would have been beaten within an inch of my life.
My children were brought up the same way. If they wanted to handle firearms, it was under my supervision. We went shooting frequently. While most of my firearms were kept in a locker, there were a couple of loaded firearms strategically placed. My son is a responsible gun owner & I would have no problem with my daughter if she chooses so. Educate the children, take away the mystique & you're better off in the long run.
I can't imagine "holding a gun on someone and that someone gets it away from you". If you've gone that far, every bit of concentration should be on that threat & you should have the resolve to use force if needed since you've displayed it. I'm in Condition Yellow when I go out & with three shootings in town (population < 40,000) this week, it's not a bad thing. Paranoid? No, just being cognizant of surroundings, avoiding potential situations and if, God forbid, I should have to draw & fire, I want the gun to go bang.
Safeties are mechanical devices & eventually they will fail whether through worn parts or dead batteries/components. If the safety fails "on" you've got yourself a dandy paperweight. And the bad guy is going to kick your ass.
Amanda-2017567 - Good and well thought out comments. Its good to see someone on here that has the ability to respond in a genuine and serious manner without attacking someone personally.
to do what your company is developing, would not only allow the governments to know you own a firearm but what kind and how many.
Hmm. In our business model we never included any sort of registration. The lock would be programmed at time of purchase. Now, in the state where I live, should a weapon change hands later proof of purchase/transfer of ownership would be required--I had to prove that my Dad owned (and I inherited) my Dad's S&W 39 before they would give me a permit for it and register it (I chose registration because it's Dad's Vietnam piece and it was stolen once--I was damned lucky to get it back five years later.) So doesn't that kind of mean they already know I own a firearm?
As to how many--aren't dealers required to keep bills of sale saying who they sold this specific item of inventory to? I realize private purchases aren't tracked in my state, but we were looking at a theoretical situation in which a biometrically-locked gun would change hands, and while proof of ownership would need to be shown so the dealer can reprogram the lock for the new owner's fingerprints.
I can see they would install a kill switch to your device on the firearms, so that remotely they can cause your weapons to become inoperable and now you have become defenseless, and to start it off it would be brought to a company like yours to create an additional component on your device to do this
And we wouldn't do it. We are just figuring out how to mount the technology into the gun to biometrically lock it; our expertise is in biometrics and hardware engineering. It would be up to the manufacturer to do that or contract to another IT/software company to do that. Opening any sort of remote function is opening a whole mess of problems we aren't equipped to consider or deal with. If DHS wants a killswitch they'll have to ask another company to develop that.
It's up to the person to take personal responsibilty and know what is wrong or right. Oh yeah if your company comes out with this lock and it gets passed to be used, could you please let me know so that I can buy a few more firearms that would fall under the grandfather clause. Thanks
There's no way we would get this put on ALL guns. That is not our intention. Our interest in this market is primarily for the average citizen who wants a gun but is also worried about their kids getting hold of it or a burglar breaking in, stealing it and shooting the owner with it. These would be offered on personal weapons for that target market only. For someone like you who doesn't like the idea, the manufacturer will have many other options to choose from.
You'll have to forgive because I'm on the verge of senior citizenry, therefore I'm old-school.
My father (ex-Korean vet) taught me how to handle firearms at an early age. There were firearms all around, with no locks, and ammunition available, also unlocked. There was a loaded 1911 in his bedroom closet. I could handle them with his supervision. I knew better that to mess with them by myself as surely I would have been beaten within an inch of my life.
My children were brought up the same way. If they wanted to handle firearms, it was under my supervision. We went shooting frequently. While most of my firearms were kept in a locker, there were a couple of loaded firearms strategically placed. My son is a responsible gun owner & I would have no problem with my daughter if she chooses so. Educate the children, take away the mystique & you're better off in the long run.
My dad was a Vietnam vet. While he never did go over guns with me, I'm pretty sure it was because of my Mom, who found my archery and fascination with swords barely acceptable--these were not classified under Activity Appropriate For Young Ladies.
I can't imagine "holding a gun on someone and that someone gets it away from you". If you've gone that far, every bit of concentration should be on that threat & you should have the resolve to use force if needed since you've displayed it.
I agree with you 100% but a couple of the people in my company stressed that their significant other had one and they would never have the courage to pull the trigger--if she were alone in the house and someone tried to break in, she would be waving it as a deterrent only.
I'm in Condition Yellow when I go out & with three shootings in town (population < 40,000) this week, it's not a bad thing. Paranoid? No, just being cognizant of surroundings, avoiding potential situations and if, God forbid, I should have to draw & fire, I want the gun to go bang.
I live in a gang-infested inner-city neighborhood in a city notorious for drugs and gangs and our football team and very little else. In my neighborhood we have a saying--'we're the a** end of the city, all the s**t ends up here.' I have never once needed to take Dad's gun out. I did have someone try to break in once--I held the cokehead at swordpoint until the cops came and the cops stood there and laughed their a**es off. (Thanks guys, I really appreciate the fine work you're doing!) But I could see what they found funny--short Asian chick with cokebottle glasses and a samurai sword holding a cokehead who couldn't even stand up straight and swordpoint.
Safeties are mechanical devices & eventually they will fail whether through worn parts or dead batteries/components. If the safety fails "on" you've got yourself a dandy paperweight. And the bad guy is going to kick your ass.
I have been in a situation where I had zero right or ability to defend myself from whatever someone wanted to do to me, and I learned not to fight.To be absolutely fair, if I'm stopped in my neighborhood, it won't be for money or a car--everyone knows I don't have a car and I'm the only wage earner, my hubby is disabled. If they want my wallet they are welcome to it. If they want my backpack with whatever groceries are in it, they can have that too. If I'm stopped it'll be because someone wants to beat me up or rape me. If they want to do either of those I'm going to accept and take it--it's happened before, I survived it before, I'll survive it again.
I'm saying the idea is bad, but should only be used in certain cases like I said the military would be great. I'm not saying the your company would include a registration, I'm saying state and federal government would use it in that way. Dealers keep a bills of sale but with out a warrant or court action they do not have to give up that information to state or federal agents, all that shows up is Amanda and TRH applied to a back ground check today to see if they could by a firearm, but it doesn't say what they bought or how many, but I know in my state I can not purchase more then two handguns in a 30 period. The next thing is I would seriously buy a lock from you and your company if you did not allow or place a kill switch but that would stop a government from getting another company to add it on. Again I'm not saying it's a bad idea but instead of having to go to the police for privacy reasons to some people maybe your company once this lock is out offer a cert and license to gun shop owners so they can buy your equipment to add a person to the lock or change the lock's ownership. So in the end it is companies like yours that continue to strive for greater levels of technology and advancement of our world.
I'm not saying the your company would include a registration, I'm saying state and federal government would use it in that way.
Every tool out there is subject to misuse. As guns are subject to misuse by criminals.
The next thing is I would seriously buy a lock from you and your company if you did not allow or place a kill switch but that would stop a government from getting another company to add it on.
This isn't a lock that can be added onto an existing weapon, this is a lock that wold be built onto a weapon during manufacture, thereby making it much harder to separate the gun from the lock and making the lock harder to tamper with. It would be up to the gun manufacturer to build the weapon with it on and offer it to the portion of the civilian population who want to have one but who want to minimize the risk of it being used in a manner the owner did not intend.
Now,as to being able to prevent a company from adding a killswitch-- since the weapon would be manufactured with the keypad integrated into it, it would be up to the manufacturer to decide if they wanted to pursue something like that. Our company would not. I would guess that a manufacturer MIGHT put out one or two makes/models with the killswitch but as soon as someone exercising their 2nd amendment rights sees this infringement of their rights they would likely not buy that model an the pilot would probably die quickly.
I think enough people would see the argument for biometrically activated guns to make a small but steady niche market, particularly those with kids. I think enough people would see the ridiculousness of a killswitch to put that idea to bed very quickly--and even if not, if you don't like the idea just don't uy a gun so equipped. It's your choice.
instead of having to go to the police for privacy reasons to some people maybe your company once this lock is out offer a cert and license to gun shop owners so they can buy your equipment to add a person to the lock or change the lock's ownership.
That was the original intent; private dealers would be licensed and certified to reprogram the lock to accept someone else's fingerprint(s). They'd be certified and given a certification code that they would then use to code a new print to gun; if the gun were to be used for a crime the code of the person who programmed it could be pulled. And if enough guns used to commit a crime came in under a particular programmers code,the programmer can be brought in to be asked bout it, maybe cops set up a sting, and people paying that programmer under the table to program an illegal firearm would be prosecuted.
AMANDA, Good in concept but what if I'm at the range and my son or the guy next to me wants to try my Kimber before he goes out and spends $1400 on one of his own.
You're at the range right there with the gun. You've already unlocked it and are using it.
maybe if the owner could have a timed over ride or something and if it was reliable 1000% of the time so I never had a break-in and my own gun wouldn't fire because I had to shoot left handed or something.
The gun can be programmed to accept multiple fingerprints. All ten if you want it that way, so no matter which finger you use on which hand you'll still activate it.
I can't see a situation where I'd risk my life or that of my family on one.
That's your choice, and we respect that. The manufacturer isn't gong to push this on everybody,we figure they'll probably offer fingerprint lock on a few makes/models for those who think its a good idea and offer a range of 'non-biometric' makes/models for those who don't.
We also have concerns about battery life, replacing the battery, possibly using a built-in rechargeable like the ones in iPods and mp3players...there are a lot of obstacles to work through, so this may never actually become a marketable solution, but it was a good enough idea to give it a try. And sometimes with technology, while it may not work for what you intended it to work for originally, it can be used for other applications.
Here's a novel idea, if you're against the Constitution of our country and not happy at all with the laws of this country "MOVE" there are plenty of other countries who already have the laws in place that you want, so have at it.
It never ceases to amaze me with all the knowledge and common sense on here and yet not a bit of it worth two cents. Oh and most of you people who continue to holler racism, are the racist. It's the only way to get some to listen to you rhetoric and even that's getting old. Name just one person whom is alive today that has been a slave for anyone but the government. You can't and yes at one time in everyone's live their relative was a slave to someone, just read the history of the human race!
If you don't like weapons then don't by them, pretty simple if you ask me. When they take the weapons away from everyone and I mean everyone, then and only then can they have mine.
Here's a better idea. Stop being so crass and finite. As I read through all of these comments, I see absolutely NOTHING that says we are against the Constitution. And as for "racism" did you see Mo Nig's picture? No? Thought so!!! As for being a slave of the government or anyone... I have no comment for you. None, because it's a pointless argument. As for not liking weapons, not buying them... It sounds like a solid plan. However, has anyone in this thread been for the ban of weapons? No. Once again you're being finite, which simply adds a bit of ignorance on your part. Oh... and you can cease to be amazed, because there's nothing to be amazed about here.
No more people who want cheap labor! No more people who are too lazy to work in harvesting! No more people who want to pay as little as possible for landscaping, housework, etc.!
CLOSE THE BORDER --- PROBLEMS SOLVED FOR ALL !!!!!
Let's ban everything guns, cars, air, dogs, cats, bicycles, kids, play ground equipment, heck even Doctors have killed people through negligence, lets ban Doctors too. LETS REALLY Ban IDIOTS, Lawyers, and Politicians !!!! Then maybe we might start to get OUR America back.
Harvest your own crops, too, grilledcheese? Want to pay more to have them picked by card carrying Americanos? Do you just eat cheese, or do you eat the meat processed by illegals? My point is that we have brought these problems on ourselves. And drugs would not be coming from Mexico if there were no market. And if there were no drug market, people would not be killing each other for control. Last, apparently, not enough of you do your own chores or there would not be a problem. "Most" is not all.
Well, stop hiring them.......America complains but most small contractors in the USA use cheap,illegal workers so they can compete with their competition.....and people who hire house cleaning companies, also find that the ladies who clean their homes are illegals...but the price is right so they turn their heads and shut up....Mitt Romney was caught twice at his home in Massachusetts, when it was revealed that his landscaping crew consisted of illegal immigrants,...twice ! But the price was right, and it's all about money for Mr. Romney.....and for most Americans,as well,,,actually,it's human nature.......
I have seen that same picture floated around the Internet for YEARS. It's an old photo I believe taken back sometime in like, '06. They bring it back out whenever there is an article that involves guns and drugs in Mexico.
dudogger is exactly right. If the US stopped buying the drugs, the Mexicans would stop sending them. If the drug trade died out, the Mexican violence problem would go away, too, and the issue of sending guns to Mexico would be moot.
If the drug trade died out, the Mexican violence problem would go away, too
Are you that naive that you think the cartels would give up the power they have simply because the drug demand went away? They are addicted to power as much as some are addicted to the drugs. Some form of corruption has been going on in Mexico just about as long as Mexico has existed as a nation. I am not saying ALL people in Mexico are corrupt but there are enough bad apples with a taste of power who are unwilling to give up what they have. Mexico is an example of the HAVES and have NOTS. There are few true middle class, especially when it comes to power.
I agree with dudogger and Barry. But we all know that the US will never stop buying drugs either from Mexico,Colombia, and all the other countries that make their money through the US high demand.
@ Catzenjammer with an idiotic comment like that I hope you can back it up in other words are you NATIVE AMERICAN?!
Only way to win the drug war is take away the demand, going after traffickers is almost useless. Lets start rehab and if they fail lock them up in a box and melt the key. Smugglers get treated like a spy convict and execute.
Scott you willing to start with the drug manufacturing companies first or are you a bigot as well? Then we can go down the line to the FDA, then to the distributions companies, then to the doctors and then to the patients, then to the dealers and then the users. Does this sound about right too you? Really get a grip, most of the drugs being used today are the pill form of synthetic heroine and that comes from who?
Drugs have been around forever in all shapes and disguises, not everyone using them are killing people. If that's the case we need to put away anyone driving a car, the pollution is in fact killing people. Not to mention all that oil everyone is killing over, or, is this stuff acceptable to you?
People that are doing the kiling get off way to easy, life w/o parole what the hell is that? because this guy decides to kill someone everyone else has to pay for him a life in prison? BS if found guilty beyond a fact, put them too sleep and in a hurry. Notice I said beyond a fact, this is because of the failed justice system we have.
Ignorance of the historical supply of drugs to U.S. consumers renders the argument null and void
Asia has long supplied U.S consumer with drugs and Columbia was a major supplier. Every time the USA goes in with military weapons and support to stop a drug producer, the drug supply chain shifts elsewhere and profits are made by the military industrial complex without any ease on the culture of drug use in the USA.
Logical and smart business people know this reality. U.S. leaders know this reality. JavaSkull? My guess is that he's stoned and does not take to value of personal responsibility.
An estimated 12.8 million Americans, about 6 percent of the household population aged twelve and older, use illegal drugs on a current basis (within the past thirty days). This number of "past-month" drug users has declined by almost 50 percent from the 1979 high of twenty-five million
Violence has escalated each year in Mexico, not declined.
trust verify---president nixon commissioned a study regarding drug addiction. the findings indicated that drug therapy was thee only effective approach to ending addiction. his administration sought to provide funds for incarcerated / out patient treatment. as we know it wasn't funded and lawmakers instead concentrated on criminalizing drug addiction. the ''war on drugs'' has been a complete failure. had we done as nixon had attempted to do we may have made some headway -instead of providing help for addicts we have chosen to build more prisons. providing treatment for addiction is indeed the only answer and the most humane approach to the drug problem threatening to destroy our country. i was not a nixon supporter but he was right in this instance.
Granny you missed my point. The RATE and NUMBER of those using drugs has DECLINED over the past many years yet the VIOLENCE ha INCREASED. Blaming Mexican violence on US consumption has no statistical connection.
World's largest consumer of cocaine (shipped from Colombia through Mexico and the Caribbean), Colombian heroin, and Mexican heroin and marijuana; major consumer of ecstasy and Mexican methamphetamine; minor consumer of high-quality Southeast Asian heroin; illicit producer of cannabis, marijuana, depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, and methamphetamine; money-laundering center.
well...when you consider that it's not really about drugs, it's about the profit they bring...how can you blame them? they may have been corrupt, but so has nearly every nation on earth in history...
they may have been corrupt, but so has nearly every nation on earth in history...
no MAY HAVE ... they still ARE. If it weren't for drugs they would find some other form of corruption to corner the market on. Blaming someone else for ones own problems is playing the blame game and resolves nothing except perhaps making the people feel good about the politicians.
HEAR, HEAR! At least marijuana, not sure what others? Tax the heck out of it, like alcohol and cigarettes, control it in the same manor, as to age, no driving while "high" and so on.
The answer to the drug problem is to end the spectacularly failed costly Drug War.
They say the Drug War is over. Don't be fooled. As long as drugs remain criminalized the Drug War will never be over.
When is the U.S. government going to finally realize that it can't legislate morality? Many people believe the answer to solving our drug problem is to simply tell people to say "no" to drugs but after being in practice for decades now the evidence shows this has failed miserably. People have been doing drugs for thousands of years and it's never going to stop. There will always be people who do drugs and those who become addicted.
Didn't we learn from the mistakes of Alcohol Prohibition in the 1920s/30s? It didn't work then, and drug prohibition certainly isn't working now. The failed Drug War has cost the U.S. taxpayers over a trillion dollars and has been in force for over seven decades. And the real tragedy here is all of the violence that has been associated with the Drug War and illegal drug trafficking. Drugs are more readily available and the Drug War has created a black market, gangs in every U.S. state, and powerful violent cartels south of the border and in other countries.
The laws have done more damage to this country than the drugs themselves. We have created more criminals out of drug users/addicts who should really be treated as medical patients. Wouldn't we be better off spending the Drug War funding on education, drug treatment and rehabilitation instead of failed law enforcement and incarceration? And not having to build more prisons?
We need to reevaluate our position on drug use in this country. I firmly believe we should decriminalize all drugs. Legalize marijuana and regulate it like alcohol in regards to the law, and create an atmosphere that doesn't stigmatize the drug user. I would never advocate anyone use dangerous hard drugs like meth, cocaine, heroin, etc. But the fact of life remains people will choose to use such drugs and become addicted. Countries in Europe have tried different strategies that have reduced the problems associated with drug use. Why can't the U.S. take these same approaches? We should adopt programs for hard drugs (meth, coke, heroin,etc.) like the Swiss heroin program (where addicts can get their drugs from medically supervised clinics) which has shown positive results in reducing violent crime and HIV infections and helps drug addicts to become stable and productive members of society.
Locking people up and throwing away the key is not the answer. When someone has a real drug problem and is addicted their main focus will always be to obtain and use drugs, regardless of any law. And putting a mark on someone's permanent record that will follow them for the rest of their lives will only hinder them to become productive members in society in getting jobs, student financial aid, etc.
There are many people against legalizing and/or decriminalizing drugs and have expressed many fears and dooms day scenarios but evidence has revealed this would simply NOT be the result. Portugal decriminalized drugs in 2001 and none of the nightmare scenarios touted by preenactment decriminalization opponents have become a reality.
And what are the ramifications of manufacturing, importing, and selling the drugs right here in the U.S? Wouldn't that create a new industry? Jobs? Tax revenue? And stop funding the violent cartels and eventually take away their power?
These are questions that I think once answered, will solve our drug problems and the days of the Drug War will be history.
"If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich" -- John F. Kennedy .
The gov. knows that leagilizeing pot could aleviate a major portion of the debt,boost the economy, and relive some of the strain on the judicial and prision systems. I remain convinced that too many people are making too much money off it remaining illegal. jails recive the bail money,courts get the fines, the police get the confiscated cash, the lawyers get their outrages fees and I know from personal experience that a few hundred dollars gets a pot charge turned into malicous mischeif, a few more and it goes away entirely. So while the ammount of money that could be generated by legalization would be greater the people who reap the profits now would not recive it. Which in turn means the corupt politicians would have to suplement their income in other ways in order to keep little buffy happy
I dont think you understand politicians at all. They don't need to end drug abuse, they just need to appear to be fixing it. Thats what wins votes. If they get on stage and make it look like they are being proactive on the drug war then they will win votes. It would be political suicide to "go soft" on the drug war because the media will tear them apart. Its all politics.
right.. tax the hell out of it. That way the "new drug war" will be the ATF/IRS getting you for tax evasion instead of the DEA getting you for possession. Cuz you dedicated potsmokers cant hold down a job good enough to pay those "hell" taxes.
President Felipe Calderon on Thursday unveiled a "No More Weapons!" billboard made with crushed firearms and placed near the U.S. border. He urged the United States to stop the flow of weapons into Mexico.
Good for the Mexican President! He should place another billboard in the border of Arizona and other in front of the house or Rick Perry.
Can we use the trash the illegal aliens deposit on their trek through the U.S., after breaking our laws to create a billboard saying no more illegal aliens on Mexico's border? I think it would be more effective if you hung some of the illegal aliens on the board, but....
Somebody call the authorities. Terrorism and hate speech is still a crime in the USA.
Oh puleese! When I first read that the first thing I thought of was hanging them up on a hook by the collar not a noose, until you said something. Still alive of course with the same amount of food and water to survive, that they normally take with them on their illegal trek into the USofA. You probably are an illegal and it was not hate speech. If it was written in a book that you were reading would it be considered HATE SPEECH?
f**ck president calderon this is the same piece of @!$%# that came to our country & before the house & senate said we need to change our views on illegal aliens & the democrats gave him a standing ovation, when they themselves do not allow illegals , he has no right to tell us how to run our country he can't even run his own !! besides if you don't think that eric holder & obama are making money on the sale of guns going to mexico your dumber than i thought , and as far as the dems. that gave him a standing ovation they should sot for treason the pieces of @!$%# !!!
A sign about "no more subsidized food" would do better at reduce illegals. Those farmers are coming here cuz they cant compete with the subsidized food we send there. So they have to cross and what's their "skill", farming. This is a big chunk of the unacccompanied males who send money back to their families.
Wow. Really? How about one on our side that says "No more drugs and illegals"? Better yet. How about a Berlin style wall going down the whole boarder. The whole gun fiasco was very wrong, but you should not throw rocks when living inside a glass house.
There are a lot of liberal Democrats who own guns for hunting and sport shooting and even more of them who are sick and tired of the situation with illegals.
We here in the US have one of the easiest countries to legaly enter. If you cant get in legaly you are probaly not the kind of people we want or need here. Hell americans cant even go to Cannada if they've been convicted of a dui.
When in the friggin world did breaking the law and defending the bill of rights become a bi-partisan issue "Better Careful." Are you liberals so blinded by hatred of conservatives that you would mock ANY of the bill of rights, or defend ANY breaking of laws? If your party stance is "Screw laws and screw the constitution" then you deserve a one way ticket out of this Country.
capncaveman I agree. Also my family came over here legally from Scandinavia. They didn't need liberals to hold their hands across the border, they paid the fees, took the test, and got a job. Novel concept.
We here in the US have one of the easiest countries to legaly enter. If you cant get in legaly you are probaly not the kind of people we want or need here. Hell americans cant even go to Cannada if they've been convicted of a dui.
Tell this guy we have one of the easiest countries to legally enter:
Vancouver psychotherapist Andrew Feldmar has been barred from entering the United States. The reason? During a random stop-and-search at a US/Canadian border crossing, a Google search of his name led to his article from the Spring 2001 'Janus Head: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Continental Philosophy, Phenomenological Psychology, and the Arts.' In it Feldmar describes two acid trips he took under the supervision of his graduate advisor in psychology -- in 1967. This turns out to have been enough to earn him a life-time ban under the grounds of 'admitted drug use.'
How about we make a deal, Mr. Calderon? You stop the drugs your worthless people are bringing into the U.S., and we will stop the guns coming over. The other choice would be for the U.S. to round up every illegal alien in this country, give them guns and send them back across the border to become your army. Then, they can shoot the drug dealers for you, since your own army is as corrupt as your government and can't be trusted. The ones left at the end of the fight could then have a fast track to U.S. citizenship, as long as they pass a background and health check.
You stop the drugs your worthless people are bringing into the U.S., and we will stop the guns coming over.
What an ignorant comment. Ask all the farmers in the red states that are prosecuting the poor Mexicans that pick crops.
I do not see a lot of white, unemployed americans getting in line to pick crops,and the farmers are losing their crops because nobody wants to pick them. The people in "occupy Wall Street"are not running there to get a job....
How about solve the problem of immigration without calling people "worthless"
Worthless people? What a silly one sided unbalanced statement.
The USA has a consumption problem; # 1 in the world.
Before Mexico supplied her, Columbia did, China and many other countries. Stopping Mexico from selling drugs to U.S. consumers will only push another to take her place.
Your Mr. Simpleton statement topped with a sprinkle of contempt and racism exposes your ignorance and lack of taking personal responsibility for a failed culture within your beloved USA.
NMEast..."You stop the drugs your worthless people are bringing into the U.S..
Not sure how you interpret that, given the current situation, any other way than the drug lords and drug runners are worthless people. They are the ones bringing drugs into the country.
Am I missing something? Since when were drug lords not "worthless". I think the average human being sees these life-destroying, murderous thugs in terms much worse than "worthless".
the farmers are losing their crops because nobody wants to pick them
Care to back those words with a statistic and cite a site? Not a news story grabbing headlines but an actual web site where crop loss is broken down by cause and effect. I have yet to hear of a shortage in the stores for ANY food product never mind one caused by lack of pickers. There IS a drought in some regions that has caused crop loss and some mild price increases.
While farming is LESS seasonal these days, the HARVEST is generally late September through December. Plenty of time to report a labor shortage causing those "losses"
how about less government about what we can do. Is this a new idea? why do we get in the way of the drugs and put people in prison that we pay for, for using drugs. Stop spending my money on prisons, and enforcement of something people should decide on themselves if they want to throw themselves in a grave. We have enough people for examples! aka Jackson, Houston, Elvis, Cobain, KEITH RICHARDS ENOUGH SAID
The bigots are the people who hire illegals and condone them coming to the U.S.
Mexico (government) and the Mexican people will never make intense efforts to better their country so long as the U.S. is an escape from that responsibility.
Nothing will ever change in any of the illegals country of origin as long as they have a means of escape from taking responsibility for themselves. Everyone who hires an illegal to help them out is committing a human rights violation because they are condemning the next generation in that country to the same fate.
Congress just had a series of hearing about the H2A visa program. Those farmers testified about lost crops or not planting in the first place cuz they cant rely on getting pickers. And despite what people think, picking crops in not an unskilled job. You have to know when to each piece (depending on crop) and pickers know this cuz they're mexican farmers who couldnt compete against the subsidized food we export to mexico.
Am I missing something? Since when were drug lords not "worthless". I think the average human being sees these life-destroying, murderous thugs in terms much worse than "worthless".
Although I agree with you that the drug lords are garbage, most of the corruption is not at the lowest level. The people making nasty comments here are talking about the poor fellow that is making a low wage to feed his family.
I am against illegal alliens as much as everybody else, but not every illegal is Mexican, and not every Mexican is a drug dealer.
It just won't stop will it? It's the fault of Law Abiding citizens of the United States that criminals in Mexico are buying Military grade weapons, real assault rifles,grenades, rocket launchers, tanks etc from South America and Argentina even from their own corrupt military etc... Law abiding citizens in the U.S. do not have access to that grade of weapons so how is it our fault. Even some f the civilian grade rifles etc are from weapons our Govt sells to Mexico. What needs to be done is close the border and prosecute the criminals to the fullest extent of the law. That includes Holder and company.....When will people ever learn, if you do nothing, nothing changes...
The U.S. wants Mexico to stop the illegal flow of drugs into the U.S. Mexico wants the U.S. to stop the illegal flow of weapons into Mexico. That flow enables drug lords to ship illegal drugs into the U.S. at the expense of thousands and thousands of Mexican lives. And...more and more U.S. lives are also being lost as the violence spreads across the border into the U.S.
Sounds like the U.S. is the root cause and has to be the root solution. So, we (the U.S.) need to stand up, take ownership, and be accountable.
If we are the supreme super power we think we are, then we need to act like one by ending the illegal flow of weapons into Mexico.
We are also a nation of individuals with rights and liberties. So, let's individually assume responsibility and stop waiting for the DEA and other U.S. and Mexican government agencies to somehow fix these problems that we as individuals created.
We need to be like any other super power and close and secure our boarder. A large wall with sufficient well armed border agents and National guard troops should just about take care of the problem.
A large wall with sufficient well armed border agents and National guard troops should just about take care of the problem.
As long as huge profits are being made by someone in the U.S., it's really not a "problem." But those making the profits will pretend it is, anyway, while bribing those guarding the wall you propose.
Prohibition never stopped the sale of alcohol, either. It just made certain people really, really rich.
Did you think up all this Bullsh*t by yourself? My what a big boy we are....To bad your head is up your a$$, How is it our (U.S.) fault? Mexico wants the U.S. to stop sending weapons? When will you people learn that that the majority of weapons in Mexico are NOT from the U.S. They are from other countries, South America, Argentina, their own corrupt military etc...read the gun trafficking reports from the ATF, FBI etc, get your facts straight before making an a$$ out of yourself in public...
Most of the weapons that are used by the cartels are military grade, fully automatic weapons. These are not the type of weapons that you can pickup at your local gun store. To purchase and possess them in the US requires a special permit from the BATFE which includes an extensive background check and a huge fee. The majority of weapons used by the cartel are from Central and South American nations and from the Mexican military. Have you ever seen a live grenade in a gun store in the U.S.? Didn't think so.
hey peanut, the conversion kits are so expensive not just anyone can afford them! While they are out there on the blackmarket so to speak, law abiding citizens will not buy them.
To get caught with an unregistered automatic weapon would not be a good thing, tens yrs in fed prison and 10 thousand dollar fine and loss of gun ownership and voting rights. How about them laws and this they do this to citizens of this country. WOW go figure, I guess if you want to break the laws and get by with it just be an illegal.
What a load of crap. If there is any flow of "automatic" weapons to Mexico it is from our government, who sells them buy the tens of thousands to governments all over the globe. As of May 19th, 1986 the buying, registering, or ownership of new fully automatic weapons was banned. Citizens may still own fully automatic weapons, only if it existed, and was registered prior to that date. Therefore the availability of registrable fully automatic firearms is severely limited, and the prices artificially inflated because of it. I don't see anyone paying 12 to 20 thousand dollars for a fully automatic rifle, waiting the 6 to 9 months for the ATF to clear them, then sending that gun to Mexico. Not to mention applying for a class three license(machine gun license) means giving up your 4th Amendment rights, as the ATF can come knocking on your door at any time and inspect your weapon, and if you don't have it you are looking at ten years in prison. Now on to illegal full automatics, if you are caught with 1 illegal full automatic you are looking at 10 years to life. This is not something the ATF plays around on, so it is supremely unlikely anyone other than our government is supplying full automatics to Mexico. Interesting fact, Obama has increased the number of firearms the State Department has sold to Mexico by 250% over even what Bush sold them.
And all those guns the U.S. is selling them are NOT going to that "ONE LEGAL GUN STORE IN MEXICO" either! (or Calderon's government). They're going to the ones with the money--the cartels--the one's that are doing all this heinous killing.
So, what you said is that BOTH Obama and Bush have created these alleged sales of guns to Mexico ?
Who has created the awesome consumption of drugs FROM Mexico, which fuels the violence ? Oh, American citizens......
Who hires illegal immigrants ? Oh,guys like Romney who got caught twice....
Who is it that kills jobs in the USA ? A.) Everyone who buys foreign made vehicles,including construction and farm equipment, and all those goods at Walmart which are made in China and India, and everyone who uses gasoline and diesel fuel which comes in from other countries !
liam, that is incorrect. The operation under bush was conducted with cooperation from the Mexican government and law enforcement, and involved a couple of hundred weapons. When it was realized that direct contact could not be kept with the weapons which all had gps trackers on/in them, the program was ended. In obama's case there was no information passed to anyone on the Mexican side of the border, our federal law enforcement officers included. And thousands of weapons were sent to Mexico with the express intent of being discovered at Mexican crime scenes. Plus when ATF officers were asking, no, begging for permission to interdict the weapons, they were told to stand down, and not interfere with their delivery to the drug cartels.
Mexico has some of the most strict ownership laws on the planet, hence the average citizen not being able to defend themselves. If you are lucky, and know, or support someone in the government they will grant you the privilege to trek to the ONE gun shop in the country and buy a .22, otherwise forget ever owning more than a slingshot.
As opposed to a country that sell drugs into another country with lots of laws in place? The gun selling was wrong. Very wrong. and heads should roll for it. But it is very hypocritical for mexico to put up a sign like that when for decades they have allowed the flow of illegals and drugs into this country.
No gun laws in place??????? And who would that be? It's illegal to own any gun in Mexico that will shoot any military cartridge. That would be 9mm, .45, 7.62x39, 30-06, 308/7.62x51, 8mm, 7x51, 50BMG and a host of others. Of course that covers all the "automatic" weapons they're crying about. Horse crap. Clean up your own mess, Mexico. Clean up your police and military. How about a little help on the border with your standing army?
Clean up your police and military. How about a little help on the border with your standing army?
See this article:
When a young corporal in the Mexican marines was ambushed by drug cartel gunmen in the state of Tamaulipas, his first thoughts were for his pregnant wife and unborn child.
But within a split second, he was focused on combat, as his unit took defensive positions around their convoy to return fire.
They managed to shoot dead four attackers while only suffering two injuries.
The victory — one of many by Mexico's marines — was helped largely by U.S.-supplied equipment and training with the U.S. Northern Command in Colorado.
"We have learned from American officers who have fought in Iraq and Afghanistan," said the corporal, who asked that his name not be used as he is not authorized to speak to the media.
"The Americans suffer from similar types of ambushes in their wars, and have learned how to respond to them in a tight, disciplined way. We apply those techniques to our fight here."
Extensive training of the Mexican marines is one of several ways in which the U.S. military machine has quietly escalated its role in Mexico's ultraviolent drug war in the past two years.
The U.S. has also supplied Mexico with state-of-the-art military hardware, including Black Hawk helicopters and surveillance drones.
Furthermore, CIA operatives and American military contractors were recently posted at a Mexican military base to advise directly on operations, according to The New York Times.
The question of U.S. military involvement in Mexico came into the national spotlight this week after Republican presidential hopeful Rick Perry contemplated American troops shooting it out with cartel hit squads.
"It may require our military in Mexico working in concert with them to kill these drug cartels and keep them off our border," Perry said.
The U.S.-trained marines have become the most efficient force in the Mexican military. Directed by Mexico's Navy Department, the marines have been increasingly favored by U.S. officials over the past two years.
In one diplomatic cable uncovered by WikiLeaks, former Ambassador Carlos Pascual praised the marines for their "emerging role as a key player in the counternarcotics fight."
Following training with the U.S. Northern Command, the marines have shot dead several major cartel bosses, including Arturo Beltran Leyva, alias "The Beard," and Ezequiel "Tony Tormenta" Cardenas.
On Wednesday, the marines took charge of a security operation in the port of Veracruz, where thugs dumped 35 corpses on a road during rush hour in September.
The Mexican marines are helped by the fact that most have a higher level of education than those in the Mexican army or federal police, the marine corporal said.
"We are considered to be the yuppies in the Mexican military," he said. "Me and most of my colleagues have university degrees. A lot of regular soldiers come from poor villages and left school when they were 16."
The Mexican marines are also considered much less corrupt than their counterparts, because they traditionally have been uninvolved in the drug war — and have had less contact with the tempting offers of billionaire traffickers.
The word which you meant is "You're", and Obama is NOT a Socialist....but Romney ? ...he created Romney care in Massachusetts.
When women wanted the right to vote in 1920,...Republicans called them Socialists, when Americans sought a minimum wage law in 1916,Republicans called the opponents Socialists,When Americans sought Workers Comp.Insurance laws,Republicans called them Socialists, When workers sought Worker safety laws, Republicans called them Communists.....There are a lot of Nazis hidden behind the curtains of the Republican Party.
No More Weapons? That's like us telling Mexico, NO MORE TACOS!
War is a racket and the USA is #1. The real question is "how to get the USA off its insatiable diet of weapons, war, drugs, and exporting global misery in the guise of freedom, liberty, and democrazy?". $$$$
The flow of illegal weapons. Bull. Those weapons are bought legally here, and if they are illegal there, that is their problem.
What Mexico needs is for the people to stop working for the drug lords which includes most of their military and politicians and stop waiting for someone to come in and take control.
WE have NO business getting involved in their problems. We have enough of our own problems.
As usual a number of highly uninformed people are making numerous comments about illegals and drugs. The problem with Mexico is this countries unsatiable desire for illegal drugs. If Americans weren't spending billions of dollars buying them, no one would be transporting them. The drug war has failed, it is time to think the unthinkable and legalize drugs, it is the only solution to all of the violence. Any well informed thinking man in the world knows this. endprohibitionnow.net.
What we need to do is to end the easy accessiblity of guns to Americans, who obviously misuse the privilege,.....something like 38 Americans a day are killed with legal guns in the USA...
liam... please cite your site. at best/worst it is 27 people a day in the USA die from gun use, legal or illegal, and about half die by their own hand, suicide.
I respectfully suggest that you issue their full pardon to all cannabis prisoners
Mr. President Obama, I am hereby respectfully requesting that your exercise your executive privilege as President of the United States and that you grant full pardons, vindication and subsequent removal of their felony convictions of all cannabis prisoners
I respectfully suggest that you issue their full pardon to all cannabis prisoners
Mr. President Obama, I am hereby respectfully requesting that your exercise your executive privilege as President of the United States and that you grant full pardons, vindication and subsequent removal of their felony convictions of all cannabis prisoners
I'm with you, free all marijuana users in jails...the USA has 5% of the World population,but 25% of ALL the people in jails all over the World, are Americans, serving time in American jails........, one out of every 31 adults in the USA is either A.) In jail,B.) On parole, or C.) on Probation....What's with that ?
Wow. Really? How about one on our side that says "No more drugs and illegals"? Better yet. How about a Berlin style wall going down the whole boarder. The whole gun fiasco was very wrong, but you should not throw rocks when living inside a glass house.
If they need to outsource a project I would suggest outsource the wall construction and border protection to either the Germans or Chinese. Those guys know how to build a wall and secure a border. Of course they treat Illegals and invaders differently than we treat "Un documented Workers"
How about we arrest one criminal alien and trade him for one weapon, you guarantee us the criminal alien will stay in Mexico, we guarantee you that weapon will never leave the USA.
We will send Mr Holder to Mexico, to take charge of rounding up weapons.
Ah you forget liberaleeeter, anytime you criticize GWB you're a patriot and anytime you criticize B.H.O. you're a racist.....damn I didn't know there were so many racists in this country....I can't wait until this country has a different president so people can STFU about the non-existent race card b.s.....
Bipartisan Congressional investigation showed that 2,070 weapons were involved in operation Fast and Furious, yet the article states that 7,500 weapons were destroyed by the Mexican government. Were did the rest come from? Easy to just blame Dems I guess.
Can we put up a sign? "No More Illegals!"
The reason of having so many drugs coming into the US is because the poverty of all the Latin American countries forces them to come here -or sell drugs- Not all illegal aliens are from Mexico. There are plenty of illegal aliens that come here with a tourist visa and never leave.
Tell Eric Holder to stop "operation fast and furious".
Dr.
I was going to post the exact same thing when I read the news post on msn. In fact I am surprised someone hasnt rented a billboard right at the border and posted it yet
Make you a trade, one illegal mexican, for one illegal gun......sounds fair....but I'm more under the impression that the illegal drug dealing and money laundering mexicans coming here are smuggling the guns back into mexico, so Mexico get some of what you call "MUY GRANDE COJONES" and start solving your own problems, before blaming someone else due to the lack of your own governments control over its people....or do you want us to police mexico with drone strikes too........
I am so ashamed that Obama and Holder are both GUILTY of sending weapons to mexico. Yes they are personally responsible and should be held accountable for the deaths!
Yes, you can put that sign up but the Politicians representing their owners will take it down.
They love looking the other way on cheap labor. It's a cornerstone of their platform to make profits at the expense of the working man on both sides of the borders!
Keep looking the other way bub! I like the tunnel vision and lack of personal responsibility. It renders us collectively on a path to cultural failure. Good Job!
Sign for our side:
No More Illegals! No More Drugs!
A slow death is still a death, and truth be known, character flaws are at the root of both. Mexicans want guns to kill each other, Americans want drugs so they can kill themselves and others by proxy. If Mexico puts its house in order, their people wouldn't need to come here to survive. Greed is at the root of all of it, and I wish us good luck with that one; it's destroyed every "civilization" on the planet. at one time or another. Talk is cheap - how about some action?
Mr. Punish....same concept should work for the weapons coming into Mexico, but Mr. Calderone would rather try and make it look like it's all the U.S.' fault instead of taking responsibility himself.
How about "No more drugs".
obama said he doesn't know anything about fast and furious, being from chi town you know he is not lying.
Exactly right. We should be responding: "Tell you what, Mexico- we'll stop it with the guns if YOU stop the filthy criminal alien leeches coming across the border. That sound fair?"
somebody should drop a match on that country
Idiot!
It is not automatic weapons that are coming from the US it is semi-automatic weapons that were sold during Holder's Operation Fast and Furious. No one in the US with a FFL would jepordize that to sell a fuly automatic weapon. Besides the paperwork that is needed for a fully automatic weapon sale is horrendous. Most of the fully automatic weapons are coming in from Central and South America.
That being said - Mr. Calderon, you stop the influx of Meth and your people into our country we might help you out.
Bring home our troops, have them police the border. Then we can 'protect' mexico from guns, while we keep out illegals and drugs.
Tell Holder ;"No More weapons"......and hey,maybe just for @!$%#s and giggles we could prosecute,and incarcerate ANYONE caught moving weapons out of THIS country illegally....starting with HOLDER,AND his handlers........years ago my old police dpt. had us put bumper stickers on all of the patrol cars that said;"Use a gun in a crime,go to jail,mandatory 5 years".....that was back in Jersey,and of course,the idiot judges never followed through..............It offends me that some politician will find a way to blame this on us gun owners that actually follow the rules.....after all it IS an election year......and BOTH parties still suck........U.S.Army Disabled Veteran...
BALANCE DA BUDGET
Get off it. A sting attempt gone wrong and started by the Bush administration may have been ill conceived and mistakes made, but it will not be criminal.
This article just points to the ridiculous nature of our gun sales policies. When criminals use US as their source for weapons because we provide the deadliest weapons... that cannot be purchased in Mexico, then we've gone too far.
Our macho stick-up-our-a$$ love-affair with deadly weapons has GOT to change.
Only if the shoe fits you all call your self americans...... and yes its a huge problem in mexico and yes its up to mexico to do thier best and fix ALL that, But for SOME of you to sit there and blame the mexicans people for all the the problems that come said come from there. Remember Americans love drugs and will bying from somebody may it be brown,black or white americans selling this stuff in the united states to you or your friends or kids by an american. You folks act like ALL the americans are perfect no problems at all yeah right. Some folks act like they never do NOTHING wrong in the united states. If you want to talk about peolple or race or talk about hanging mexicans go stand in front of the mirror or go down the street yes the people you just past up while driving as they sell drugs on your street and STOP and start with them tell them something dont hide hide behind a computer board like a coward and be rasics. Mind you NOT all mexican have good values like trying to start a new life in the united states the land of the free etc...... trying to do the right and live ....... sit back and look at SOME SOME americans here in the states are robing the welfare systems and you dont say a darn thing like its ok with you to do that and they are all kinds of race doing it. If you do care....... about any of this and are a human being and want to help a human(mexican) people come up with pilot program thats help bring money in to somebodys pockets (americans) and do what the states did for others that want a new life here in the states a good life. Dont rip into people if you cant do any thing positive for and person(s). go back into your closet of hate.
Obama and his operation gone wrong. "Rocket Man" Obama and his minion Eric Holder and fully and totally responsible for this. The time line backs this without question. The sign shoud BE PLACED ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN so our idiot in chief could see it every day he is there. That would be about 6-9 days a month because of his golf and vacations.
LMarcT your wrong we DO NOT supply the deadliest weapons they get those from Central America, China or Russia or the middle east. Unless you mean the full auto's we sent to the Mexican military who couldn't keep there own people and let them defect to the drug lords WITH there govt. issued weapons. No licensed dealer in the U.S. would risk years in prison and the loss of there very expensive and hard to get FFL by knowingly selling to straw purchasers. I live in Utah which according to the Brady center is the worst state in the U.S. for gun control and I don't have a full automatic. (wish I could afford one and had the time to do all the required paperwork) Here's a NEW IDEA " CLOSE THE BORDER" no more drugs and illegals crossing North bound, No more guns (authorized by Eric Holder) going South !!! I go through more security to enter a court building for jury duty than crossing at Juarez either direction. At least as of 8 years ago. (The last time I crossed at Juarez or Nogales).
And just how easy is it to legally buy a gun? Last time I checked there was a waiting period of several days and also a background check to make sure you did not have a criminal record. If you want to discuss how easy it is to illegally buy a gun, then you cannot pass enough laws to stop that, for the simple fact that it is being done illegally already.
IRESPOND:
While this is true, according to the Department of Homeland Security, over 50% of the illegal aliens in the United States are from Mexico. So while Mexico is not the only country to have illegal aliens in this country, they are the majority of the problem.
www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/ois_ill_pe_2010.pdf
Supply and demand. Americans demand drugs and cheap labor so Mexico provides both with their supply. Mexico demands guns to support and defend its drug business so America supplies them. This is a heart warming story of basic capitalism. Most of this trade is illegal but what do laws have to do with anything when big money is to be made. It never stopped a politician so why should it stop normal Americans?
I have nothing to say about the people who think this just started with Obama. They have their own illusions to deal with.
US to Mexico: No More Wetbacks!
BALANCE DA BUDGET & Pat G-3324946
Please explain how OBAMA is responsible for the flow of weapons to Mexico? You mean, the day he was elected in the White House is the day weapons started flowing to Mexico? You whiners and complains crack me up. You point the finger of blame on ONE Person, and forget that our government has 3 branches of Government. You forget that Congress has the ability to pass laws that could STOP the flow of weapons to Mexico. If Obama did work with Congress to pass a law or he used executive authority, you would whine and complain about that as well.
Lastly, the funniest thing of all, is you love to whine and complain but offer no solution of your own. That's like a little child on the playground saying "she took my barbie".
Grow up.
I think the sign was directed at obumbo and holder, not the rest of us honest law abiding people.
Project Gun Runner was started in Texas then went National under President Bush. It changed to Fast & Furious under President Obama. It was a sting operation that had good results. But like any high-risk, dangerous operation, things can and did go wrong. The childish comments from those that want to hate President Obama are just that - childish and hateful with no sound judgement.
This is the same Calderon who criticized Arizona's new immigration law, while at the same time forgetting that Mexico has the toughest immigration laws in the Western Hemisphere?
Look up this article on your favorite search engine:
Mexico’s Immigration Law by J. Michael Waller
Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us.
That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the US look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:
The law also ensures that:
Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens – and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, legal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.
It is an interesting law – and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.
We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says:
Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration preaching is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States. Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.
Oh, and all you right-wingers who keep trying to blame the President and the Attorney General need to check your facts. Operation Fast and Furious started in the Bush II Administration.
How about pointing the finger at Dubya Shrub and Halliburton Honey?
Seal the borders, crack down hard on drugs coming into the US, and let them deal with the problem on their own. It's time to stop being the police for the rest of the world. I understand that the US demand for drugs doesn't help their situation so by all means we should help them by dealing with that problem in our own country. As far as going to war with these cartels, no thanks. Our tax dollars have much more to do right now.
The cartels will get their guns from anywhere they please..With more cashflow than their own Government Felipe can put up as many signs as he wants, they also hold Ak-47..Mexico a very Violent race will cut your head off, your tongue out, cut into pieces and not think twice..
Calderon really has some nerve. It is his on people that are smuggling the guns into Mexico. In addition, the worst of the weapons, i.e. the fully automatic assault weapons, are not coming from the US. They are coming in from Central and South America. It is near impossible for a civilian to buy a fully automatic weapon in the US.
In addition, we should put up a sign that says no more illegals and no more drugs. Calderon should clean up his own house before he goes around trying to criticize the US.
Obama and Holders Fast N Foolish was a modified concoction of Bush's "Wide Receiver" sting program except it went a lot further and was poorly planned and executed.
Bush's "Wider Receiver" program gave direct notice to the Mexican authorities so that they could try to track the guns as they crossed the border. Bush officials learned that this program may in fact be dangerous as some weapons could get across the border past Mexican authorities so they wisely stopped it.
Obama and Holder were clueless as usual being too focused on the political gain aspects of it and screwed it up royally. Bush at least had the sense to realize the dangers weren't worth the risk.
One big difference between the Bush administration's gun walking scheme and obama's- Bush's program put trackers on all the weapons, obama's did not.
This exemplifies a big flaw in the obama administration- they come up or copy ideas except they fail to go from step one to step two. I mean seriously, how did Holder plan to track the guns? The way it's been happening -they're found at murder scenes?
Put your money where your mouth is, flock of cowards. Sure, go put up a sign, a billboard, hell rent some skywriting. Just do something other than complaining and blaming.
ernest gonzales 1.18,
Tell you what I'll be Cheech and you be Chong for a minute ? See long ago there were drugs without violence..So you will now blame the US for how the Cartels operate is crazy..They are at War amongst themselves.
Balance Da Budget wrote...
I find it ironic that the guy with a Ronald Reagan avatar pic is saying something like this.
*cough Iran-Contra cough*
If all these automatic weapons are coming in from the US. They have to be coming from the US government. With few exceptions, have you heard of Automatic weapons being used in crimes in the US? If they were all that easy to get, wouldn't all the criminals in the US be using them?
Yes it is legal to own an automatic weapon in the US, but the cost, paperwork and scrutiny are very great.
Hmmmmm, let's see...
A great movie ending.
Violent criminals are being pursued by the authorities. To avoid capture, they escape from Mexico into the United States...
Nah, let's stick with reality. Violent criminals USUALLY escape from the U.S. into MEXICO to avoid capture.
C'mon. You gentle folks on the RIGHT know better. You've watched enough Westerns. Or does the region of your brain that controls xenophobia automatically override all sense of history?
Give it a rest.
I mean, "JS in SD should pick up a book, occasionally.
1. Mexico's Cartels are feeding the insatiable appetite for drugs that THIS country has.
2. It is WAY too easy to buy fully automatic weapons in the U.S. and Teapublicans are trying to make it even easier.
A simple google search, dude. You have a computer. And don't just search your usual "reliable" sources. Do a real search.
..."Calderon should clean up his own house before he goes around trying to criticize the US."....
Every time the Left tries to enact meaningful legislation, the Right's answer is, Mexicans are dirty.
Have a nice day.
..."
Bush may have started the gun sting but odumbo and holder are the ones responsible for the EPIC FAIL of the sting.
Mexico should POLICE its own borders instead of expecting us to police it for them.
They will not allow our LEO's military in to their country to do what they cant or wont do.
And we should adopt their immigration laws, nice post btw.
Posted again for emphasis...
Get off it. A sting attempt gone wrong and started by the Bush administration may have been ill conceived and mistakes made, but it will not be criminal.
This article just points to the ridiculous nature of our gun sales (and enforcement) policies. When criminals use US as their source for weapons because we provide the (some of the) deadliest (and easiest to obtain) weapons... that cannot be purchased in Mexico, then we've gone too far.
Our macho stick-up-our-a$$ love-affair with deadly weapons has GOT to change.
() indicates change to post.
Collapse again if you wish, but we need to grow up and rid ourselves of our gun fetish.
Fake media propaganda rebuttal
You blame Obama and then say Mexico should police it's own borders. Which means the federal government (sorry, its not just Obama that makes up our government), should do nothing?
Sorry, but your brilliance is astounding.
NOT!
Yea, since they work so well... the gun runners love em.
Just a reminder... for those that can't read or don't pay attention..
Border enforcement and deportation is the highest in history under the current administration.
I agree this IS a huge problem. But it's as much yours as mine as Bush's as Obama's... it's been like this for decades!
So I repeat... get off it.
Bravo Charles!
It was a very nice thing to find reason and facts in response to the first article I read this morning. Thank you. Today is going to be a good day.
Keep up the good work, it is greatly appreciated.
LMarc..."A sting attempt gone wrong and started by the Bush administration may have been ill conceived and mistakes made,..."
Under Bush the feds always knew where the guns were. Under Obama, the feds lost track of them and they fell into the drug lords hands.
Fair enough to say it got out of hand under Obama, but you know for a fact if the roles were reversed, it had started under a Democrat and got out of hand under a republican, that the liberals would be foaming at the mouth and wanting heads to roll.
Even the fact that the government 'thought' they could succeed in tracking the drug cartels by selling automatic weapons to them (The Fast and Furious Scandal) says how stupid the government really is. And for Attorney General Eric Holder to lie about it only makes the situation worse.
There is an amusing side to this and that is, despite tons of proof to the contrary, millions of people in the U.S. still think a bigger government is better.
Given this, and the fact that O'bama's administration ran guns into Mexico, leads me to believe that O'bama hates Mexicans! Racist!!!
Kornfed! Stop that! Good morning.
It would be nice to put up a sign pointing towards Mexico saying 'No more illeagals'. But the US representative from W. Texas (Reyes-D) would say that isn't legal or that it isn't right. In New Mexico the democrat majority run state senate says it's ok for illegals to get drivers license. There lies the BIG problem.
How about a sign that says "No more bigots?"
I would gladly accept every hard working immigrant from Mexico that wants to come here in exchange for all the bigots spouting lies about them in the US.
At least the immigrants work hard and don't complain. The bigots are too busy looking for a free ride, special privileges, and destruction of the Constitution and our American way of life to be worth keeping.
¡Amigos míos! O'bama desea ejecutar a todos fuera de la ciudad! No crea su retórica. No creo que las suites de la ley Obtuvo en contra de dos estados del sur! Corrió las armas en sus comunidades para promover el caos en su país.
America's appetite for illegal drugs is responsible for the deaths of 35,000 Mexicans.
Unauthorized immigrants (who come from all over the world, not just Mexico) are responsible for imprving the American economy, creating jobs, and generating tax revenues. They should be granted citizenship, and our rules should be changed so that they no longer discriminate unfairly. If you can find a job here, you should be welcome.
How many of you would actually work that construction job for the cash they make lol. That's all I wanna know before you consider stripping the labor workforce XD
Your hippie parents would not appreciate a comment that blames them directly for our current illegal immigration problem. Getting high does not make them murderers!
commonsense....
"If you can find a job here, without requiring taxpayer funded health care, food assistance, and housing, you should be welcome."
FTFY.
But otherwise yeah.
Well now that gets to the gist of the problem now doesnt it. Its not jobs that Americans wont do, as that dumb ass Bush used to suggest...they are jobs Americans wont do for the going wage those jobs pay. Not only is it not an affordable wage, but those Americans must also pay taxes on that artificially smaller wage. Did housing prices go down with this influx of illegal labor? No,,,they did not. You Dems should be furious at what is happening to the construction industry, and to that American that wants to work with his hands for a decent living.....that is now destroyed. White collar, you are next. Jobs are getting outsourced to a "cheaper" alternative. I would start contemplating what that really means if I were you.
The US does NOT want to end the drug war and does NOT want to stop illegal entry to the US. The illegals create cheap labor for our corrupt corporations and the drug war creates big profit for our military complex and plenty of high paying law enforcement jobs(cops, judges, prison guards, lawyers, etc.)
Tent - the answer right now is NONE. No American Consumers are willing to work the construction or agricultural jobs that immigrants - legal or otherwise - are willing to do.
If they were, the jobs would be filled, and we wouldn't have the 'illegals' problem, now, would we?
Of course there's the issue of the employers paying them in cash under the table at rates below minimum wage or other requirements.. but hey, that's just good old capitalism at work, right?
Fact is, these people come here and work. And American Consumers have it too easy and refuse to work, it's easier NOT to.
We fix that, that's a good step.
American addicts buy the drugs, creating a billion dollar industry that would not otherwise exist. American drug policy drives the industry underground and ensures that it will be run by criminals.
As much as you may seek to evade responsibility for your own, actions do have consequences.
Insulting my parents doesn't change matters; it merely reveals something about your character.
Translation
Credibility = Zero. More moronic nonsense from Korny...
Lighten up
Mr. Calderon sure is one Mexican with cojones. He has blamed the drug problem on the U.S. before, now he's blaming the weapons problem on us also. He fails to see, or doesn't want to see, that the problem is his corrupt government , military and police.
I don't see what Mr. Hussein O'mama has to do with all this.
So all we need to do now is crush up a bunch of cocaine, meth, and pot. Then we make a giant billboard out of it that says "NO MORE DRUGS". Then we post armed guards around it to stop people from trying to snort it.
Pete, in spite of a massive disinformation campaign, immigrants do not receive
By law, immigrants are not eligible for subsidized housing or food assistance.
It's a myth, promoted by organizations like the Center for Immigration Studies, FAIR, and NumbersUSA, all of which were founded by Nazi-admirer John Tanton, who has stated publicly that wants to the "genetics" policies of the Third Reich to be adopted in the United States, and he thinks immigration policy is the best place to start.
You can find information about taxpayer funded health care from the Rand Corporation; information about food assistance from the Government Accountability Office.
most of these guns come from drug deals addicts steal guns trade then for drugs and dealers pass them up the chain because they are just like cash on the black market
LMarkT
Typical progressive/liberal, continue to repeat yourself until even you believe the BS.
Fast and Furious was not even related to the Bush program.
Maybe deportations are up under this administration but so are lawsuits against honest Americans for trying to stop illegal immigration.
Commonsense - They may not be eligible, but with false identification, they can easily acquire food assistance and housing.
It's pretty simple, you don' just kick the Illegals out you ask yourself why do they wanna come here at all? Then you tackle the route of the issue, soak up the free labor I swear you won't get it cheaper from some other guy who feels entitled to that and higher pay for even less a quality in the job.
Comment # 1 restored for clarity.
brian-1077790 banned for wanting to drop matches on many other countries.
Take it elsewhere.
In the future, crisg, ernest gonzales, don't respond like this.
Thanks.
NYT Lies, you are suspended for a day for violating rule # 5 of the Code of Honor.
lol! that's a first for me! someone got banned for wanting to drop matches...priceless! totally justified though, sally...no offense intended...
Common sense: "Pete, in spite of a massive disinformation campaign, immigrants do not receive taxpayer funded health care, food assistance, and housing By law, immigrants are not eligible for subsidized housing or food assistance."
Common, how about their anchor babies? Do they get anything? Do false green cards get services? Do hospitals kick them out? Schools?
I'm seriously considering starting up a donation fund for a sign that says "No more illegals" made out of old trucks/cases/bags used to transport drugs over the border. Mexico has a lot of nerve. Acting like it's 100 percent our fault that drug cartels operate inside their country. If they didn't have guns, they use something else.
I've said this on many other posts concerning this type of issue. But it's both countries fault for failing to secure the border and stop the drug/gun trade.
mexico has some nerve, huh?
United States
World's largest consumer of cocaine (shipped from Colombia through Mexico and the Caribbean), Colombian heroin, and Mexican heroin and marijuana; major consumer of ecstasy and Mexican methamphetamine; minor consumer of high-quality Southeast Asian heroin; illicit producer of cannabis, marijuana, depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, and methamphetamine; money-laundering center.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2086.html
And that's from the CIA website...
commonsense:
WRONG! It is the American war on drugs and drug prohibition that is the root cause of all the violence and deaths associated with illegal drug trafficking. Just like alcohol prohibition was responsible for the crime sprees in 20s/30s.
You blame the drug users incorrectly when the blame should be put on failed U.S. drug policies.
It's not the drug users...it's the drug laws.
If you support the continuation of the drug war then the blood of over 40,000 Mexicans is on your hands.
We'll be sure to stop weapons traffic just as soon as he stops human traffic !!
I can't take a thing this clown has to say seriously after the GARBAGE of him coming to OUR country and shaming us on our immigration policies when his own nation in fact has much stricter immigration policies than the U.S. El Presidente Felipe Calderon is a bad joke that will hopefully soon the hook from the Mexican people at the ballot box !!
The Fast and Furious Gun sales to the government of Mexico was started by the Bush administration....Obama and Holder have tried to pass a law restricting gun stores on the Mexican border to sell "no more than 2 semiautomatic rifles or "long guns" to individuals in a six week period of time", in an effort to stop massive gun sales to Mexican cartels......naturally, the NRA objects and has filed suit against Obama to stop the law so that precious gun store owners can continue the sales of unlimited quantities of semi-automatic weapons to whomever seeks one in such states with weak gun laws......red-blooded Americans who have small genitalia are objecting to the Obama regulation.
Commonsense.... You're hurting the brand name.
Under US Law illegals don't get benefits? Complete and utter BS.
Been to the projects layely? How about Obama's Aunt? She fled 2 federal deportation orders in Chicago and was found living for years here in Boston, getting welfare, public housing, medical etc.
How hard are they checking?
No mention of Fast and Furious in an article about Guns in Mexico? Completely slanted and biased.
And the attempt to blame Bush again is just pathetic.
I think we should conquer Mexico and kick them all out to their south and make it a giant natural park off limits to all humans.
True, but around 65% of all illegal aliens are Mexican nationals, and another 18% of them come from countries south of Mexico! Look it up!
No more illegal aliens, MEXICO!
Stop looking the other way on cheap labor! Your hypocrisy is showing!
If you traded 5 guns for every illegal in the US, you'd still have 11 Million Ilegals in the U.S.
Mr. Calderon........Put all that effort and money, you put into making that sign into stopping people from illegally leaving your country!
WE CANNOT DO IT ALL!!!
More wasted tax dollars on a country we don't own or goveren.
If they want to keep US guns out of Mexico they should build a big fence and patrol the border. This is a two way street. The corruption of the Mexican government can't control the populus and they want to point the finger at someone else. They should be more concerned about the guns coming in from South America and other countries in the illegal arms trade than US guns coming over the border.
No US guns in Mexico, no illegal Mexican citizens in the US. If they can guaruntee the later, I would urge our polititians to ensure the former.
Remember- The Democrats gave Calderon a standing ovation when he spoke to Congress about the rights of the illegal aliens in our country. They need those potential Democrat voters. (notice how the left is fighting Voter ID-see the connection?).
This from the leader of a country that does not give birthright citizenship and has far stricter illegal immigration laws than our own.
Mr. Johhny - who's looking the other way on cheap labor? I don't hire illegals. Do you? How do you know baybb does? How dare you call people you know nothing about "hypocrites" on this issue.
No more bigoted putdowns, baybb29!
You have no valid point to make other than to encourage other people to hate and discriminate against all people from Mexico in particular, and all Latinos and all immigrants in general.
Once here, unauthorized immigrants obey our laws to a far greater extent than the 'native-born' crowd, are far more likely to hold a paying job, far less likely to be on welfare, far less likely to receive medical care, but far more likely to pay for it when they do, pay more than their fair share in taxes, and CREATE jobs for US citizens. Unauthorized immigrants come from all over the world, entering all over the US. Many merely overstay valid visas.
Bigots, on the other hand, pit one group of Americans against another, blame all their problems on people who had nothing to do with creating those problems, make things worse by distracting attention away from REAL problems, and advocate for weakening the Constitution.
And this gives them some right to ignore the law and stay? This kind of thinking is a huge part of the problem and "commonsense" must be some sort of oxymoron with you as you display none in your comment. We cannot claim to be a nation of laws and allow this to continue. I don't care how you want to coat it to make it palatable. Wanting to see the laws enforced and these criminals (that's what we call lawbreakers) be punished by at the very least being returned to their point of origination does NOT make one a bigot. This is a REAL problem. What part of "illegal alien" got past you? It doesn't matter that in order to conceal their status as a criminal that they obey other laws. Give us a break.
Fastz - illegal aliens can not vote!!! Get your facts straight!
People who do the same things you do everyday should not be considered 'criminals' with no right to exist. Working, paying taxes, going to school, driving a car; these things are not crimes if YOU do them. They should not be considered crimes when an immigrant does them.
I see hundreds of people break the law everyday on my way to work, and hundreds more on my way home. They routinely drive over the speed limit. How can we claim to be a "nation of laws" when we allow this to continue. And these people are repeat offenders.
Crossing a border one time without inspection is a misdemeanor civil violation. So is overstaying a visa.
People do those things for one reason and one reason only: under current rules, they would not be allowed in otherwise, because the social engineers (i.e., bigoted, incompetent political hacks) who wrote our current rules don't want too many brown people coming in. But if you're not brown or black or yellow, you automatically qualify for a 'diversity visa' lottery.
Current rules allow for entry of up to 5,000 unskilled laborers per year. Yet for the past 25 years, American businesses have hired an average of 400,000 to 500,000 foreign born unskilled laborers per year. The current rule is just plain STUPID.
Some of these people have been here for decades. Many have been here nearly their entire lives. They HAVE no other homes.
We haven't treated people this poorly since passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1965. It's unAmerican and unConstitutional.
STUPID laws, like those allowing slavery in the US or making it illegal for Jews to work in Nazi Germany, need to be changed, not enforced.
"illegal" is the new n-word.
Josef Goebbels would proud of your accomplishment. If you worked for the old KGB, you would be idolized.
hey mexico, no more drugs, no more illegals. No more guidebooks for illegals.
Pat
This Illegal Alien woman voted 9 times!
LAKE COUNTY, Ill. - An illegal alien from the Philippines was arrested Thursday morning on a felony complaint charging her with 17 counts related to voter fraud in Lake County. The state charges resulted from a joint investigation conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the Lake County State's Attorneys Office. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) also provided assistance.
Maria Azada, 53, of Grayslake, Ill., was arrested March 17 by ICE HSI agents and a Lake County State's Attorneys special investigator. Azada faces 17 felony counts in Lake County Circuit Court of perjury, mutilation of election materials, and tampering with voting machines in connection with illegal voting by a non-U.S. citizen.
The investigation began in February 2009 when Azada admitted to a USCIS officer during an interview for an immigration benefit that she had voted in an election. It is illegal for foreign nationals to vote in national or state elections in the United States.
A subsequent investigation revealed that Azada allegedly voted nine times in primary, general and consolidated elections between 2003 and 2009. According to the arrest warrant, Azada allegedly falsely claimed to be a U.S. citizen on two Illinois Voter Registration applications.
Notice if you will that this is from ICE.gov
http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/1103/110317lakecounty.htm
Labeling all Mexicans as "illegal" is bigotry, pure and simple.
Saying that all unauthorized immigrants are Mexican is also bigotry (not to mention incorrect).
The 'punishment' for speeding is payment of a fine. Not loss of livelihood, not splitting apart of family, not exile to a foreign country.
Driving without a license? The response is GET A LICENSE, show it to us, and then go about your business. If you ALLOW people a legal pathway, they will follow it. To DISALLOW a legal pathway merely because you think you dislike a certain ethnic group is bigotry.
I didn't see where Amused or Baybb labeled all Mexicans as illegals. That is pure conjecture on your part. Illegal is a descriptive word. Comparing speeding to ILLEGAL entry into the US is ludicrous at best. Speeding is an offense with a punishment for all residents who break traffic laws. Entering the US ILLEGALLY and deportation TO THEIR HOME nation is doled out to those that break our immigration laws. What do you tell the people who have waited years to get their chance to LEGALLY enter the US and start their pursuit of the American Dream. Here's another item to burst your bubble, they take jobs that US citizens will do as well as lowering wages in those trades. I live it, do you?
Resenting an invading population is not bigotry, it is standard human response. It is global, predictable, unavoidable, and justified.
Even were it not, comparing the fault of bigotry to invasion is misguided. One is illegal, the other is a matter of character.
I agree that intrinsically tying Mexicans to illegal immigration is wrong however, we can't simply continue to ignore the issues that are quite literally shouting in our face as a nation.
The fact of the matter is, we have a critical problem with illegal immigration in the United States that mostly pertains to Mexican nationals. This country has done far more to open it's borders to Mexican immigration requests than any other nation has done in contemporary history.
Part of immigration control is the realization that:
Crossing a border is a criminal offense...it's not that breaking the speed limit is what gets the gears going, it's that they illegally crossed our borders (or did not leave at the expiration of their granted stay) and have been identified. If you or I broke the law and evaded civil or criminal action, you had better bet that you'd land in jail/prison on a warrant that's been out for your arrest (I forgot to pay a parking ticket and got a night in jail after getting pulled over).
Mexico's Calderon spends a lot of time blaming Americans for the problems in his nation, but neglects to state the obvious...that his own citizens have been making a mass exodus across our borders for more almost 100 years, leaving only a fraction of their citizenry to battle the drug cartels and violent gangs.
Keep in mind, it often takes a majority to win a battle against a powerful enemy. The drug cartels weren't always drug cartels, they have long been violent gangs and outlaws who oppressed the Mexican people. Mexico isn't unique for having this problem, our nation experienced these woes for hundreds of years, as settlement to the West and South occurred. Our pioneers didn't give up and migrate to Canada en masse, but instead built communities to protect themselves. It's a fact of life...pack animals (including humans) need larger and stronger communities to fight the fringe.
Mexico has done absolutely NOTHING to stop the tidal wave of expatriation that is making their country suffer. Mexico lacks the man power and will to stop the crime and violence that they clearly suffer, and will not be able to until they begin protecting their own borders.
Anyway, I am getting sick of this whole blame the drug user argument. Americans may be creating the need, but the dealer is the one perpetuating it. In this country, we prosecute both drug use and drug distribution, and guess which one gets more penalties?
I am a liberal blue-to-the-teeth gay man, but even I can see when our platform is getting a bit ridiculous!
LAND OF THE GUN - the United States
they create a profit larger than what will last forever..
so much profit that moving arms to nations and countries as Mexico, is not going to stop.
People, realize that there isnt just one side who is guilty. you can blame Mexico, you can blame America, you can point fingers at your friendly neighborhood drug dealer..but in the end, its just the way the world is.. cold..
nothings going to change, at least not for the good.
theres only one who can judge, the one seated on the throne.
Commonsense, the only one who said this is all about Mexicans is you. You won't find that in my post. I think my term was a more generic "illegal alien." Let me address your rather irrational retort.
If that immigrant is here against the law, then yes, they are criminals. You may not like it, but there is a law there and it has been violated, they are criminal. Not any gray area there for you to exploit with your extremism.
We do not, we have active police officers who enforce traffic laws. If you get caught, you pay the consequences. We do not have enough police to catch everyone. The same applies to the border, we do not have enough enforcement present. Because someone broke the law and got away with it does not lend excuse to another to do the same thing. What kind of logic is that?
Their reason does not matter. It is against the law. It is against the law becausee for a variety of reasons the country can only accept so many newcomers in a year without damaging the infrastructure. Look around you to see the results of ignoring the law. Our social safety net would be more than adaquate and sustainable if it were not paying for people who viloated laws to get here. Common sense, think about it with your emotional blinders off.
Wrong again. What is just plain stupid is being so greedy that you are unwilling to pay someone a family livable wage to do a job. What is just plain stupid is not being willing to pay a reasonable price for an item so that a business can pay the family livable wage. What is just plain stupid is cutting your own throat and realizing you are doing it.
They should have spent some time over the "decades" trying to get right instead of trying to hide. They know they broke the law, they know they could get caught, they know they could be sent back, they rolled the dice.
This sounds harsh to you because for some reason you think our borders can be open and anyone can just waltz right in, that it will have no effect on the people already here who are trying to create and manage a society. You have no respect for the property or the work of others. Dude I am as liberal as it gets on a lot of issues, but you post sounds like one giant excuse for people who really do think life is free and that co-opting the work of others is just fine. No sale.
In 1847, the USA invaded Mexico in an unjust,illegal war, which noted Republican Abraham Lincoln protested, and was called a "traitor" by his opponents. The real purpose of this war was to obtain more land for the USA which could be declared as "Slave-owning States". The US President concocted ( lied) about a non-existent border crossing of a Mexican Army unit into the USA....the President then ordered the US Army to "pursue" the Mexican Army, which really meant to Attack Mexico, which was a peaceful nation.
Thousands of innocent Mexicans were killed by the US Army and 40% of Mexico was stolen from that nation....Arizona,parts of New Mexico,California and Nevada.....
You reap what you sow..........
Oh my God, here we go:
FYI -- California wasn't stolen from Mexico...it was a sovereign nation that won it's independence from Mexico before the Mexican-American War ever began. Read a history book, why don't you!!
Millions of innocent people have been raped and murdered within the borders of Mexico due to it's apparent disinterest in quashing lawlessness long before and after the United States forced the purchase of the territory. Mexican soldiers brutalized people living within those territories and American citizens passing through to California.
So true, oh so very much true. Mexico has nobody to blame for it's problems but itself.
Since this will more than likely turn into a bunch of 2nd Amendment brouhaha... Let's start with this:
Now if you truly, absolutely, without any other interpretation believe in the 2nd Amendment; then felons and murderers' rights to own a gun should NOT be infringed, either. But they are. So where's our patriotism towards upholding their rights? Yeah... thought so...
Now, don't get me wrong! It is NOT the self-respecting, took a gun safety class, registered gun owner, moral citizen that I'm worried about. It's the large majority of 'other' gun owners. And since there are so many, it's obvious proof that there are too many Americans who cannot handle the freedoms that they're given. Very simply put, a gun in their hands makes a target out of you and me. But alas, Pro-2nd Amendment activists will not take the necessary responsibilities to prevent such people from getting guns in fear of selfishly losing their freedoms as well. SIGH, what's one to do then?
And last but NOT least; someone will sooner or later say, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people." I really hate such juvenile, pointless, impotent arguments. Plain and simple, guns help people kill people more easily. Sure, one could kill someone with a wet noodle if they try hard enough... but is that really a valid argument? No.
ChrisWanker, the overwhelming majority of gun homicides in the U.S. are perpetrated by people who already have felony convictions. They chose to give up their 2nd amendment rights when they chose to be felons, just like they gave up their right to vote. Your "point" is juvenile and impotent.
So then Sir, what do you suggest??
With that philosophy, Better get rid of the alcohol people drink so they cannot get drunk and drive and kill people with their car. Oh, Might as well ban the cars also.
@photobiker,
Unless you're referring to those who have felony convictions as not "people", I don't understand what you mean.
Now, I know that there are 'other' laws and articles that amend the amendments, which is only more government intervention, but let's take a look at the part I'm stressing here:
So, I guess you're going to have to elaborate on why my "point" is juvenile and impotent. Seriously! Please elaborate!!!
@YellaHammer,
I suggest nothing. Just stating an opinion and a couple facts.
@Marcm,
And while we're at it, let's get rid of wet noodles, too! Sheesh!!!
Where the hell did you come up with felons rights to possess a weapon of any kind. The NRA DOES NOT advocate that criminals should be allowed weapons. The NRA supports the 2nd amendment rights of those LAW ABIDING citizens only. You should learn cognitive reading... It's people like you that cause problems for law abiding citizens. Enforce the gun laws on the books today and stop being pussies about it.
Uh, nice name? And even nicer avatar of a big white guy punching a little black guy in the face... No racial stuff going on there!!!
Oh, and maybe you should learn some cognitive reading while you're at it as well. I am plain and simply pointing out the fundamental basis of the 2nd Amendment. And nothing beyond that. The only part where I mention anything like that NRA is where I state that they won't do anything because they are "in fear of selfishly losing their freedoms as well." Not that they advocate for criminals to possess guns. In fact, I stated quite the opposite.
Meaning that no one is upholding their rights. You know what...? Never mind, you're obviously a waste of [anyone's] time!
@ChrisWanker -
Then you must agree that it was the spoons of the world that got Rosie Odonnel fat! Get rid of all the spoons!
Cars make people drive drunk!
Pencils miss spell words!
YellaHammer said:
So then Sir, what do you suggest??
My company is working on biometric locks that would be mounted on the gun itself. when a gun is purchased the dealer programs the fingerprint keypad to accept it's owners fingerprint and maybe the souse's if they are getting the gun for protection. If a child gets hold of it the keypad won't recognize their fingerprint and it won't fire. If someone breaks in and steals your gun it won't fire either.
Anyone buying a gun through private party ads will have to take the firearm to a licensed registered certified dealer or to the police station to have the biometric lock programmed to accept the fingerprint of the new owner. Proof of purchase required. Any attempts to circumvent the biometric lock will render the gun inoperable.
It sounds like a good idea to us. Anyone got an opinion, yea or nay?
@ou812-
And you just made a "juvenile, pointless, impotent argument"!!!
@Amanda,
You have a "yea" from me! Now the only problem is making it the law for ALL guns to have them.
While we're criticizing avatars and names..."wanker" - isn't that the British term for a jack-off? '
Second, your avatar is Lenin in front of the Soviet COMMUNIST flag! (No, commies are NOT cool!).
You have no room to talk.
Chris, do you think people who commit murder are concerned about laws?
Gun-control laws only turn law-abiding citizens into defenseless prey.
Amanda, that sounds wonderful.
Theres an old saying "when you outlaw guns, then only outlaws will have guns".
Your an idiot!!
@timetraveler100,
It's also an Austrian surname. SIGH... Grow up!
As for my avatar, touche!
@Mike,
Which is why I'm worried about them. Better gun-control does not turn "law-abiding citizens" into prey! Where do you get that? A law-abiding citizen can "legally" purchase a gun to protect them self.
@theisrishman,
I didn't say outlaw guns.
@Jak,
You're super smart!
Interesting picture by your name wanker. Ask him about gun control.
Vladimir Lenin, "One man with a gun can control 100 without one."
Photobiker - I'm sure your statistics are comforting to all those who were killed by guns not wielded by felons. If I am shot, I sure hope it is by someone who does not have a criminal record. (I was almost killed by my father-in-law, a law abiding citizen who got real nervous when I had trouble opening the door one night with the new key he had given me). You may want to further explore your statistics and check out just who is shooting who. There are a lot of felons shooting other felons out there. So Chris is really right. If I am a felon living in a felony ridden neighborhood, then do you really expect me not to have a weapon? And what about non-violent felons, especially all those white-collar crime guys? They are a lot less violent than a lot of people who legally have weapons?
Chris...I understand exactly what you're trying to say. And if the world were black and white, it would apply. But the world is shades of gray and we're not functioning in absolutes.
"Better gun-control does not turn "law-abiding citizens" into prey!"
New York City has gun control laws so strict they are a de facto ban on guns. Hopefully you won't, but if you ever have a criminal stick a gun in your face when you're totally defenseless, you will understand the concept of "prey" in absolute terms. Just ask someone who has had the experience.
@YellaHammer If it can be programmed it can be hacked criminals will allways have guns destroy every gun on the planet today and tomarow the will make thier own.
Chris, I agree with what you say about everyone has a right to defend themselves, wether they be a felon or not. Most people forget that once you have served your time you have payed your debt to society. As for guns you all are missing the big picture here. The second amendmet goes futher then just owning a gun. If my ememy has a big gun, I want a bigger one if he has a tank, I want a bigger one. The second amendment is about protecting yourself period. Even and mostly from your own government. That is why it is second only to freedom of speech. And for those who think it is about hunting, you are wrong. That is what the government and the media want you to think.
How about punish people who send the weapons or drugs over the boarder with very harsh felony's and if your concerned with illegals going over the border punish the Companies that hire them. Serious companies that hire illegals should be put out of business plain and simple.
good point outback, a tour of any prison museum will show you what paraphenelia has been confiscated, knives, home-made guns, darts, dice machines. The criminals will not be without weapons if they can. Outlawing guns to stop those who wish to defend themselves is truly a moronic idea. (Think Middle East- and the weapon of choice- suicide bombs.) Take away one, another weapon pops up. Take away all weapons, expect hammers, and wrenches to be used, etc. etc.
ChrisWanker is a troll, c'mon people. If he really wanted to live in a place where everybody including murderers and rapist and so forth can have firearms, then he would live in MEXICO!
ChrisWanker
your argument about treating felons the same under the 2nd amendment would mean you feel they should not be banned from voting either.
I believe in ALL the rights given me under the Constitution. I and all members of my family served defending those rights. Arguing the felon card is a red herring. The felon gave up those rights by violating the other half of having rights and that is exercising them RESPONSIBLY.
There are already restrictions on who can own a gun. Stricter than who can own a car. Both however are often ignored or bypassed by CRIMINALS.
MY issue with the whole gun control thing is that the anti gun folks want a TOTAL and complete ban. They parade out one thing then start adding more and more restrictions on who and where and what type can be owned.
Many anti gun folks don't even have a clue what they are speaking of when they start listing guns to restrict. This article is a prime example where the Mexican president is quoted as saying AUTOMATIC rifles and handguns. I am by no means an expert but I am not aware of any automatic pistol available in the USA without FFL. I am guessing he is referring to the MAC-10 and the like. Same with automatic rifles.
AMANDA, Good in concept but what if I'm at the range and my son or the guy next to me wants to try my Kimber before he goes out and spends $1400 on one of his own. maybe if the owner could have a timed over ride or something and if it was reliable 1000% of the time so I never had a break-in and my own gun wouldn't fire because I had to shoot left handed or something. I can't see a situation where I'd risk my life or that of my family on one.
We used to have institutions that taught people about the rights and responsabilities of being a citizen of this country instead of just how to pass a stupid test. The law-abiding but irresponsable gun owner is a public education problem.
As for Mexico: If anything they need more guns. Restricting guns to only criminals obviously hasn't been working for them. Even if the cartels don't get the guns from the US, they have plenty of other sources. We only hear about the guns that come from here.
@AMANDA,good concept,but criminals will find a way around it.a gun is a simple mechanism,it can be broken down and tweaked by almost anyone with some mechanical ability.
Amanda-2017567 - What your company is doing is a great concept. I hope that it's something that can come to the market and help. Unfortunately, it can't address the many guns left in the world that will not have this technology.
scott in salt lake - Maybe the safety feature will be like an adjustable seat in a car. You can have up to 3 or 4 settings. If you are the range, and a stranger wants to you use your gun and test it out, you could 'temporarily' authorize him to use it, and then erase it. Sounds feasible to me.
Mr Wanker, This is a statement to support OUR Constitution, NOT mexico's, this is the gist of the story I believe, not Felons, why 'guns' kill (I own several and they have NEVER opened the safe, jumped out, ran from the house and shot someone!) In your argument, cigarettes kill many more than guns each year, as does cancer (typically caused by an unhealthy use of something), etc. So, with all of you inane ramblings, what is your solution, I am suure that the sitting Government is waiting with bated breath for it.
Contrary to the belief of many of our fellow citizens, the purpose of the United States Constitution is not to grant us rights. Our rights, given to us by our Creator, are inalienable. The purpose of the Constitution is to limit the powers of the federal government. Look at the language of the Bill of Rights. It is chock full of “shall not” and “shall make no;” all of which refer to the United States government.
Our explicit rights, that is, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are contingent wholly upon our implicit right: the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The intent of the Second Amendment is to preserve and guarantee, not grant, a pre-existing right; again, the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
Arms, by which we mean guns, allow the free citizen to exercise self-defense; to protect one’s self from predators of various stripes, be they criminal malefactors or rapacious government. St. George Tucker—Revolutionary War officer and later U.S. District Judge—in his Blackstone’s Commentaries of 1803 wrote that “the right of self-defense is the first law of nature.”
The Fourth Amendment—“The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizure, shall not be violated”—would be hollow prose without the Second Amendment to give it teeth. This concept was recognized very early by the Framers. Noah Webster wrote in 1787,
This sentiment was expressed best, perhaps, by one of Virginia’s favorite sons. In 1788, Patrick Henry wrote, “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches this jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.”
Certainly guns have enormous recreational uses and add hugely to the sporting life of our people. But the intent of the Framers was not to safeguard the rights of target shooters and duck hunters. It was to preserve our freedoms from an aggressive government. Keep in mind that the Framers were insurrectionists. They were well acquainted with the realities of oppressive rule and were determined to give the citizens of this republic the tools necessary to preserve and protect their freedoms.
The Constitution is a document of unique concepts and principles. But it will provide the framework for the Rule of Law in this country only so long as we remain an armed citizenry and do not allow ourselves to become unarmed serfs.
@Zachary123,
I love you, too!
@marty,
Very true. However, every time there is an article about "guns" and "America" on MSNBC.com pro-2nd Amendment activists come out in full force. I honestly decided that being the first to post something somewhat "gray" about the topic would be more interesting than reading about some guy saying, "You can take my guns from my cold dead hands". Anyway, interesting read you have there.
@ Amanda -
Sounds like Obama stimulus money at work. Until Congress passes a law mandating their use or Obama issues another executive order circumventing the wishes of the American people, they will never fly.
Get your resume in order. Your company may be the next Solyndra.
ChrisWanker - I live in NJ, one of the most liberal states in the country with some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Guess who has all the weapons? Ding ding ding. Yes, that would be the criminals. The liberals have done a FINE job here. Sheesh.
@Amanda,
The type systems your company is working has existed for years. Unfortunately as was proven the are full of issues. As some mentioned what if I need to shoot with the other hand? What if for some reason the fingerprint that is programmed into the weapon is unreadable (i.e. I'm wearing a bandaid) and I NEED the weapon in a life or death situation (yep, been there)? Even agencies like BATF have stated time and time again that such a system is not only unsastainable, but too costly and problematic to be viable. So IF your company is indeed working on such a system, they either have more money than they know what to do with, or they are purposly wasting it. Which is it?
I would just like to add to what Dbachrach said. If you are fighting for your life and have blood on your finger when you finally fight your way to the gun it would not work because your fingerprint would be unreadable. Or if I happen to be eating Doritos at the time they busted in. Or if I have driving gloves on in the winter when someone tries to carjack me. So I have to agree that it is a total waste of money.
@grilledcheesesandwich,
So... You're saying that not one law abiding citizen has a firearm? Because that's how I'm reading your statement. Try not to be so finite.
@Dbachrach and 1wizard,
Technicalities. I'm certain it's just like the trigger locks that people can already buy. You can leave them on and hope that there's never going to be a situation where you find yourself fumbling for the key... or leave it off and hope that no one ever steals your gun and/or grabs it and uses it on you.
However, one thing that trigger locks have proven is that they work against accidents and theft.
When will people stop taking the 2nd out of context. The right exists "as part of a well regulated militia" it does NOT apply (when taken verbatim) to arbitrary individuals without supervision (by the militia). Back in the 1700's 1800's most of the non-hunting guns in "Civilized" areas were kept in local armories and not in the individual's possession. If the militia / local goverment decided there was sufficient risk, they would authorisze access the guns.
Everyone is acting like the only people who sell guns are private citizens or small arms dealers, and yes it would be hard for them to sell fully-auto weapons, but the weapons contractors have an overstock of military style weapons and as we saw throughout the 80's and 90's they have no qualms about selling them to any 3rd world dictator who has the money to buy them. During the 80's some of our largest exports to Africa and Central America were automatic weapons, rocket launchers, grenades, chemical weapons, etc.
Chris Wanker said:
You have a "yea" from me! Now the only problem is making it the law for ALL guns to have them.
It would start out being safety option. it would be up to a manufacturer to decide if they want to add the technology, but it would fall under 'gun lock' laws--instead of buying a separate lock for the gun there would be one built in. We think, the industry as a whole would welcome something of this sort, and those who are most in favor would be those who have young children in the house. We've all heard the stories about kids getting hold of Dad's gun and shooting themselves accidentally--this would eliminate the possibility of it.
Cassie said:
Amanda, that sounds wonderful.
We thought so to It' still in design stages but we're hopeful.
outback said:
If it can be programmed it can be hacked criminals will allways have guns destroy every gun on the planet today and tomarow the will make thier own.
spiceman said:
good concept,but criminals will find a way around it.a gun is a simple mechanism,it can be broken down and tweaked by almost anyone with some mechanical ability.
We're looking at tying the lock into the gun's actual mechanics so that any tampering renders the gun inoperable.
It's about time said:
What your company is doing is a great concept. I hope that it's something that can come to the market and help. Unfortunately, it can't address the many guns left in the world that will not have this technology.
The gun will have to be built with the biometric lock on it, it can't be added as an aftermarket accessory or option, but we're also going to suggest manufacturers offer a 'trade in' option when we complete design and testing and pitch the technology to them. You trade in your old one, get a hefty discount on a new one with the biometric lock on it.
That being said, yes, anything made by man can be hacked/broken by another. Nothing is foolproof. But if you think about it, it will get rid of a lot of the 'accidental' shootings--the kids who accidentally shoot themselves while playing with Dad's gun, the kid who takes it to school planning to shoot up the school and then the gun doesn't work. Those kids, and the majority of small-time criminals out there (the drug addict looking for something to hold up a dealer, the average burglar breaking into a house) isn't going to have that technical know-how. It's not going to eliminate accidents like Giants player Plaxico Burress shooting himself in the leg.
BigE said:
Sounds like Obama stimulus money at work. Until Congress passes a law mandating their use or Obama issues another executive order circumventing the wishes of the American people, they will never fly. Get your resume in order. Your company may be the next Solyndra.
It's actually not stimulus, it's partially funded under Homeland Security's $98 billion budget.
They've funded development of portable DNA analyzers (which they are planning to use at airports and border checkpoints)
They've funded development of WAASS (Wide Area Aerial Surveillance) systems that can be fitted to drones in US airspace to conduct search-and-rescue in remote ares, aerial surveillance of the borders, and tracking criminals in hotspot areas throughout the US.
They've funded development of FAST (Future Attribute Screening Technology) and are currently testing it in an undisclosed area of the Northeast. Its a scanner that will measure a person's perspiration, breathing, pulse and eye movement to predict if the person will commit a crime. It was developed primarily for use in airports to scan fliers for anyone about to commit a terrorist attack or other crime--anyone the system deems a possible terrorist threat can be apprehended by TSA/DHS before they even get on a plane. Initial results show the scanner has 70% accuracy in detecting signs of nervousness in test subjects who were instructed to act (or not) in a nervous fashion.
Dbachrach said:
The type systems your company is working has existed for years. Unfortunately as was proven the are full of issues. As some mentioned what if I need to shoot with the other hand?
The biometric lock can be programmed for any finger of either hand (or multiple fingers of each hand. All ten if you want.
@ChrisWanker
Technicalities? I would say problem...big problem...when your firearm doesn't go off when you want it or need it. I'd hate to be the firearms manufacturer on the sh*t end of a wrongful death suit because someone got killed trying to defend himself & the gun would not go off.
Technology cannot solve everything. You still have good vs. evil & common sense vs. stupidity.
Wizard said:
If you are fighting for your life and have blood on your finger when you finally fight your way to the gun it would not work because your fingerprint would be unreadable.
When is the average citizen going to be 'fighting for your life'? I live in a bad neighborhood (automatic weapons in a driveby shooting four years ago Christmas night, ended with bullet holes in the front door) and I never had to use mine (inherited my Dad's Vietnam piece, a S&W model 39) I've actually used my swords more often than the gun. It's not going to be for military or law enforcement weapons, it'll be mainly for the civilian population.
BigE:
Technology cannot solve everything. You still have good vs. evil & common sense vs. stupidity.
No, it's not going to solve everything. This technology is being developed for the average citizen who would like a firearm around the house but wants to make sure that their child doesn't accidentally shoot themselves or their friend with it, the average burglar, or the messed up kid with psych problem who takes Dad's gun to school with the intent of shooting their classmate.
If you're holding a gun on someone and that someone gets it away from you and tries to shoot you with your own gun it won't work--they aren't going to have time to hook a computer up to the gun and find the password to unlock the coding and circumvent the lock, nor are they going to have the time to try and reprogram it.
And if your kid can hook it up to the home computer and break the programming, that kid has too much time on his hands and YOU need to do a better job of securing it from him. AND he'd better be applying for a job because people pay big money for those kinds of skills!
@ Amanda
I would have to say no to what your company is doing, maybe for the military it would be a great idea, so that our enemies could not use our weapons against us, me being an 11B and seeing what happens out there this would come in handy. But concerning civilians, that would be a big no. My reasons are not only do you have to do a background check via state and federal so make sure you can own a firearm, in a way it allows the government to know you have a firearm, yes it doesn't state what you are buying as long as it's not fully auto, but to do what your company is developing, would not only allow the governments to know you own a firearm but what kind and how many. The point to that freedom is, when and if the government becomes the enemy of the people, the people will be able to defend and rid themselves of their enemy. But what would stop the govenment from coming to your household and confiscating your weapons, they would have your address your name, what you own, etc... Also with the way technology develops so fast and I now working in the technology field and seeing it first hand, I can see they would install a kill switch to your device on the firearms, so that remotely they can cause your weapons to become inoperable and now you have become defenseless, and to start it off it would be brought to a company like yours to create an additional component on your device to do this, and their reason would be something like this if it was allowed to pass. "We are applying a kill switch to all weapons biometric locks, so incase a weapon is used in a crime and we can identify it we can kill it." But hey I'm just one man and his opinion like everyone else. It's up to the person to take personal responsibilty and know what is wrong or right. Oh yeah if your company comes out with this lock and it gets passed to be used, could you please let me know so that I can buy a few more firearms that would fall under the grandfather clause. Thanks
Amanda -
You'll have to forgive because I'm on the verge of senior citizenry, therefore I'm old-school.
My father (ex-Korean vet) taught me how to handle firearms at an early age. There were firearms all around, with no locks, and ammunition available, also unlocked. There was a loaded 1911 in his bedroom closet. I could handle them with his supervision. I knew better that to mess with them by myself as surely I would have been beaten within an inch of my life.
My children were brought up the same way. If they wanted to handle firearms, it was under my supervision. We went shooting frequently. While most of my firearms were kept in a locker, there were a couple of loaded firearms strategically placed. My son is a responsible gun owner & I would have no problem with my daughter if she chooses so. Educate the children, take away the mystique & you're better off in the long run.
I can't imagine "holding a gun on someone and that someone gets it away from you". If you've gone that far, every bit of concentration should be on that threat & you should have the resolve to use force if needed since you've displayed it. I'm in Condition Yellow when I go out & with three shootings in town (population < 40,000) this week, it's not a bad thing. Paranoid? No, just being cognizant of surroundings, avoiding potential situations and if, God forbid, I should have to draw & fire, I want the gun to go bang.
Safeties are mechanical devices & eventually they will fail whether through worn parts or dead batteries/components. If the safety fails "on" you've got yourself a dandy paperweight. And the bad guy is going to kick your ass.
Amanda-2017567 - Good and well thought out comments. Its good to see someone on here that has the ability to respond in a genuine and serious manner without attacking someone personally.
Applause from Texas
TRH8 said:
to do what your company is developing, would not only allow the governments to know you own a firearm but what kind and how many.
Hmm. In our business model we never included any sort of registration. The lock would be programmed at time of purchase. Now, in the state where I live, should a weapon change hands later proof of purchase/transfer of ownership would be required--I had to prove that my Dad owned (and I inherited) my Dad's S&W 39 before they would give me a permit for it and register it (I chose registration because it's Dad's Vietnam piece and it was stolen once--I was damned lucky to get it back five years later.) So doesn't that kind of mean they already know I own a firearm?
As to how many--aren't dealers required to keep bills of sale saying who they sold this specific item of inventory to? I realize private purchases aren't tracked in my state, but we were looking at a theoretical situation in which a biometrically-locked gun would change hands, and while proof of ownership would need to be shown so the dealer can reprogram the lock for the new owner's fingerprints.
I can see they would install a kill switch to your device on the firearms, so that remotely they can cause your weapons to become inoperable and now you have become defenseless, and to start it off it would be brought to a company like yours to create an additional component on your device to do this
And we wouldn't do it. We are just figuring out how to mount the technology into the gun to biometrically lock it; our expertise is in biometrics and hardware engineering. It would be up to the manufacturer to do that or contract to another IT/software company to do that. Opening any sort of remote function is opening a whole mess of problems we aren't equipped to consider or deal with. If DHS wants a killswitch they'll have to ask another company to develop that.
It's up to the person to take personal responsibilty and know what is wrong or right. Oh yeah if your company comes out with this lock and it gets passed to be used, could you please let me know so that I can buy a few more firearms that would fall under the grandfather clause. Thanks
There's no way we would get this put on ALL guns. That is not our intention. Our interest in this market is primarily for the average citizen who wants a gun but is also worried about their kids getting hold of it or a burglar breaking in, stealing it and shooting the owner with it. These would be offered on personal weapons for that target market only. For someone like you who doesn't like the idea, the manufacturer will have many other options to choose from.
jak-3696747, you are suspended for a day for violating rule # 1 of the Code of Honor.
BigEsaid:
You'll have to forgive because I'm on the verge of senior citizenry, therefore I'm old-school.
My father (ex-Korean vet) taught me how to handle firearms at an early age. There were firearms all around, with no locks, and ammunition available, also unlocked. There was a loaded 1911 in his bedroom closet. I could handle them with his supervision. I knew better that to mess with them by myself as surely I would have been beaten within an inch of my life.
My children were brought up the same way. If they wanted to handle firearms, it was under my supervision. We went shooting frequently. While most of my firearms were kept in a locker, there were a couple of loaded firearms strategically placed. My son is a responsible gun owner & I would have no problem with my daughter if she chooses so. Educate the children, take away the mystique & you're better off in the long run.
My dad was a Vietnam vet. While he never did go over guns with me, I'm pretty sure it was because of my Mom, who found my archery and fascination with swords barely acceptable--these were not classified under Activity Appropriate For Young Ladies.
I can't imagine "holding a gun on someone and that someone gets it away from you". If you've gone that far, every bit of concentration should be on that threat & you should have the resolve to use force if needed since you've displayed it.
I agree with you 100% but a couple of the people in my company stressed that their significant other had one and they would never have the courage to pull the trigger--if she were alone in the house and someone tried to break in, she would be waving it as a deterrent only.
I'm in Condition Yellow when I go out & with three shootings in town (population < 40,000) this week, it's not a bad thing. Paranoid? No, just being cognizant of surroundings, avoiding potential situations and if, God forbid, I should have to draw & fire, I want the gun to go bang.
I live in a gang-infested inner-city neighborhood in a city notorious for drugs and gangs and our football team and very little else. In my neighborhood we have a saying--'we're the a** end of the city, all the s**t ends up here.' I have never once needed to take Dad's gun out. I did have someone try to break in once--I held the cokehead at swordpoint until the cops came and the cops stood there and laughed their a**es off. (Thanks guys, I really appreciate the fine work you're doing!) But I could see what they found funny--short Asian chick with cokebottle glasses and a samurai sword holding a cokehead who couldn't even stand up straight and swordpoint.
Safeties are mechanical devices & eventually they will fail whether through worn parts or dead batteries/components. If the safety fails "on" you've got yourself a dandy paperweight. And the bad guy is going to kick your ass.
I have been in a situation where I had zero right or ability to defend myself from whatever someone wanted to do to me, and I learned not to fight.To be absolutely fair, if I'm stopped in my neighborhood, it won't be for money or a car--everyone knows I don't have a car and I'm the only wage earner, my hubby is disabled. If they want my wallet they are welcome to it. If they want my backpack with whatever groceries are in it, they can have that too. If I'm stopped it'll be because someone wants to beat me up or rape me. If they want to do either of those I'm going to accept and take it--it's happened before, I survived it before, I'll survive it again.
@Amanda
I'm saying the idea is bad, but should only be used in certain cases like I said the military would be great. I'm not saying the your company would include a registration, I'm saying state and federal government would use it in that way. Dealers keep a bills of sale but with out a warrant or court action they do not have to give up that information to state or federal agents, all that shows up is Amanda and TRH applied to a back ground check today to see if they could by a firearm, but it doesn't say what they bought or how many, but I know in my state I can not purchase more then two handguns in a 30 period. The next thing is I would seriously buy a lock from you and your company if you did not allow or place a kill switch but that would stop a government from getting another company to add it on. Again I'm not saying it's a bad idea but instead of having to go to the police for privacy reasons to some people maybe your company once this lock is out offer a cert and license to gun shop owners so they can buy your equipment to add a person to the lock or change the lock's ownership. So in the end it is companies like yours that continue to strive for greater levels of technology and advancement of our world.
@ Amanda
^ mistype meant to say 'I'm not saying the idea is bad' fingers typing faster then my mind can process. Low of caffine.
TRH said:
I'm not saying the your company would include a registration, I'm saying state and federal government would use it in that way.
Every tool out there is subject to misuse. As guns are subject to misuse by criminals.
The next thing is I would seriously buy a lock from you and your company if you did not allow or place a kill switch but that would stop a government from getting another company to add it on.
This isn't a lock that can be added onto an existing weapon, this is a lock that wold be built onto a weapon during manufacture, thereby making it much harder to separate the gun from the lock and making the lock harder to tamper with. It would be up to the gun manufacturer to build the weapon with it on and offer it to the portion of the civilian population who want to have one but who want to minimize the risk of it being used in a manner the owner did not intend.
Now,as to being able to prevent a company from adding a killswitch-- since the weapon would be manufactured with the keypad integrated into it, it would be up to the manufacturer to decide if they wanted to pursue something like that. Our company would not. I would guess that a manufacturer MIGHT put out one or two makes/models with the killswitch but as soon as someone exercising their 2nd amendment rights sees this infringement of their rights they would likely not buy that model an the pilot would probably die quickly.
I think enough people would see the argument for biometrically activated guns to make a small but steady niche market, particularly those with kids. I think enough people would see the ridiculousness of a killswitch to put that idea to bed very quickly--and even if not, if you don't like the idea just don't uy a gun so equipped. It's your choice.
instead of having to go to the police for privacy reasons to some people maybe your company once this lock is out offer a cert and license to gun shop owners so they can buy your equipment to add a person to the lock or change the lock's ownership.
That was the original intent; private dealers would be licensed and certified to reprogram the lock to accept someone else's fingerprint(s). They'd be certified and given a certification code that they would then use to code a new print to gun; if the gun were to be used for a crime the code of the person who programmed it could be pulled. And if enough guns used to commit a crime came in under a particular programmers code,the programmer can be brought in to be asked bout it, maybe cops set up a sting, and people paying that programmer under the table to program an illegal firearm would be prosecuted.
Missed one!
Scott in salt lake said:
AMANDA, Good in concept but what if I'm at the range and my son or the guy next to me wants to try my Kimber before he goes out and spends $1400 on one of his own.
You're at the range right there with the gun. You've already unlocked it and are using it.
maybe if the owner could have a timed over ride or something and if it was reliable 1000% of the time so I never had a break-in and my own gun wouldn't fire because I had to shoot left handed or something.
The gun can be programmed to accept multiple fingerprints. All ten if you want it that way, so no matter which finger you use on which hand you'll still activate it.
I can't see a situation where I'd risk my life or that of my family on one.
That's your choice, and we respect that. The manufacturer isn't gong to push this on everybody,we figure they'll probably offer fingerprint lock on a few makes/models for those who think its a good idea and offer a range of 'non-biometric' makes/models for those who don't.
We also have concerns about battery life, replacing the battery, possibly using a built-in rechargeable like the ones in iPods and mp3players...there are a lot of obstacles to work through, so this may never actually become a marketable solution, but it was a good enough idea to give it a try. And sometimes with technology, while it may not work for what you intended it to work for originally, it can be used for other applications.
Here's a novel idea, if you're against the Constitution of our country and not happy at all with the laws of this country "MOVE" there are plenty of other countries who already have the laws in place that you want, so have at it.
It never ceases to amaze me with all the knowledge and common sense on here and yet not a bit of it worth two cents. Oh and most of you people who continue to holler racism, are the racist. It's the only way to get some to listen to you rhetoric and even that's getting old. Name just one person whom is alive today that has been a slave for anyone but the government. You can't and yes at one time in everyone's live their relative was a slave to someone, just read the history of the human race!
If you don't like weapons then don't by them, pretty simple if you ask me. When they take the weapons away from everyone and I mean everyone, then and only then can they have mine.
@darrell,
Here's a better idea. Stop being so crass and finite. As I read through all of these comments, I see absolutely NOTHING that says we are against the Constitution. And as for "racism" did you see Mo Nig's picture? No? Thought so!!! As for being a slave of the government or anyone... I have no comment for you. None, because it's a pointless argument. As for not liking weapons, not buying them... It sounds like a solid plan. However, has anyone in this thread been for the ban of weapons? No. Once again you're being finite, which simply adds a bit of ignorance on your part. Oh... and you can cease to be amazed, because there's nothing to be amazed about here.
Have a nice day.
No more illegals!!!
No more people who want cheap labor! No more people who are too lazy to work in harvesting! No more people who want to pay as little as possible for landscaping, housework, etc.!
CLOSE THE BORDER --- PROBLEMS SOLVED FOR ALL !!!!!
Let's ban everything guns, cars, air, dogs, cats, bicycles, kids, play ground equipment, heck even Doctors have killed people through negligence, lets ban Doctors too. LETS REALLY Ban IDIOTS, Lawyers, and Politicians !!!! Then maybe we might start to get OUR America back.
No more excuses for illegals. And Cap'n? Most of us out here do our OWN landscaping, do our OWN housework, etc. Get rid of all of them.
Most of you actually don't do that, hence the abundance of their cheap labor hahahaha. Good try though.
Harvest your own crops, too, grilledcheese? Want to pay more to have them picked by card carrying Americanos? Do you just eat cheese, or do you eat the meat processed by illegals? My point is that we have brought these problems on ourselves. And drugs would not be coming from Mexico if there were no market. And if there were no drug market, people would not be killing each other for control. Last, apparently, not enough of you do your own chores or there would not be a problem. "Most" is not all.
lol @ Trent. I promise most people in Mississippi do their own landscaping. Poorest state in the Union=No money to pay illegals to do it for us!
So no, the average middle class citizen doesn't hire illegals to do their landscaping for them. At the very least, not any more.
Well, stop hiring them.......America complains but most small contractors in the USA use cheap,illegal workers so they can compete with their competition.....and people who hire house cleaning companies, also find that the ladies who clean their homes are illegals...but the price is right so they turn their heads and shut up....Mitt Romney was caught twice at his home in Massachusetts, when it was revealed that his landscaping crew consisted of illegal immigrants,...twice ! But the price was right, and it's all about money for Mr. Romney.....and for most Americans,as well,,,actually,it's human nature.......
It's cheap labor buddy, if the middle class is that broke then It isn't the middle class XD
Did anyone else see all of that money of the table? No wonder we outsource so many jobs.
I have seen that same picture floated around the Internet for YEARS. It's an old photo I believe taken back sometime in like, '06. They bring it back out whenever there is an article that involves guns and drugs in Mexico.
Psh. Thats what my monthly rent payment looks like...or at least feels like...
Okay, heres the deal, Calderon. Holder will stop sending weapons into Mexico if you stop sending wetbacks into the U.S. Agreed?
thank you
And drugs!!!!
Don't forget who drives the drug trade - US demand. Dumb TeaBubbas...
dudogger is exactly right. If the US stopped buying the drugs, the Mexicans would stop sending them. If the drug trade died out, the Mexican violence problem would go away, too, and the issue of sending guns to Mexico would be moot.
Barry-NY
Are you that naive that you think the cartels would give up the power they have simply because the drug demand went away? They are addicted to power as much as some are addicted to the drugs. Some form of corruption has been going on in Mexico just about as long as Mexico has existed as a nation. I am not saying ALL people in Mexico are corrupt but there are enough bad apples with a taste of power who are unwilling to give up what they have. Mexico is an example of the HAVES and have NOTS. There are few true middle class, especially when it comes to power.
I agree with dudogger and Barry. But we all know that the US will never stop buying drugs either from Mexico,Colombia, and all the other countries that make their money through the US high demand.
@ Catzenjammer with an idiotic comment like that I hope you can back it up in other words are you NATIVE AMERICAN?!
trust_verify- Without drug money the cartels would have a lot less power.
Only way to win the drug war is take away the demand, going after traffickers is almost useless. Lets start rehab and if they fail lock them up in a box and melt the key. Smugglers get treated like a spy convict and execute.
No they'll just restructure and find a new way of making money. Like kidnapping for instance.
Catzenjammer, don't use racist slurs to discuss the issues please. you are suspended for a day for violating rule # 5 of the Code of Honor.
Scott you willing to start with the drug manufacturing companies first or are you a bigot as well? Then we can go down the line to the FDA, then to the distributions companies, then to the doctors and then to the patients, then to the dealers and then the users. Does this sound about right too you? Really get a grip, most of the drugs being used today are the pill form of synthetic heroine and that comes from who?
Drugs have been around forever in all shapes and disguises, not everyone using them are killing people. If that's the case we need to put away anyone driving a car, the pollution is in fact killing people. Not to mention all that oil everyone is killing over, or, is this stuff acceptable to you?
People that are doing the kiling get off way to easy, life w/o parole what the hell is that? because this guy decides to kill someone everyone else has to pay for him a life in prison? BS if found guilty beyond a fact, put them too sleep and in a hurry. Notice I said beyond a fact, this is because of the failed justice system we have.
Dear Mexico: let's make a deal. You quit sending drugs, we quit sending guns.
You seem to forget the law of supply and demand. If the US is the best costumer, full of drug addicts, the drugs will continue coming.
Same thing can be said for the guns. If the drug cartels continue to have high demand for guns then they will keep flowing into Mexico.
JavaSkull needs a lobotomy!
Ignorance of the historical supply of drugs to U.S. consumers renders the argument null and void
Asia has long supplied U.S consumer with drugs and Columbia was a major supplier. Every time the USA goes in with military weapons and support to stop a drug producer, the drug supply chain shifts elsewhere and profits are made by the military industrial complex without any ease on the culture of drug use in the USA.
Logical and smart business people know this reality. U.S. leaders know this reality. JavaSkull? My guess is that he's stoned and does not take to value of personal responsibility.
IRE,,,and the left wants to legalize them!
IRESPOND
So as demand has declined the violence should as well. That has not been the case.
From the Justice department
Violence has escalated each year in Mexico, not declined.
trust verify---president nixon commissioned a study regarding drug addiction. the findings indicated that drug therapy was thee only effective approach to ending addiction. his administration sought to provide funds for incarcerated / out patient treatment. as we know it wasn't funded and lawmakers instead concentrated on criminalizing drug addiction. the ''war on drugs'' has been a complete failure. had we done as nixon had attempted to do we may have made some headway -instead of providing help for addicts we have chosen to build more prisons. providing treatment for addiction is indeed the only answer and the most humane approach to the drug problem threatening to destroy our country. i was not a nixon supporter but he was right in this instance.
Granny you missed my point. The RATE and NUMBER of those using drugs has DECLINED over the past many years yet the VIOLENCE ha INCREASED. Blaming Mexican violence on US consumption has no statistical connection.
LOL....riiiiiiight....
United States
World's largest consumer of cocaine (shipped from Colombia through Mexico and the Caribbean), Colombian heroin, and Mexican heroin and marijuana; major consumer of ecstasy and Mexican methamphetamine; minor consumer of high-quality Southeast Asian heroin; illicit producer of cannabis, marijuana, depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, and methamphetamine; money-laundering center.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2086.html
Joe your point would BE????? Simply being the largest consumer reflects a different statistic than the trend of use.
Mexico has been a corrupt nation long before they became the primary external source of drugs into the USA. Go smoke your joint and relax.
well...when you consider that it's not really about drugs, it's about the profit they bring...how can you blame them? they may have been corrupt, but so has nearly every nation on earth in history...
no MAY HAVE ... they still ARE. If it weren't for drugs they would find some other form of corruption to corner the market on. Blaming someone else for ones own problems is playing the blame game and resolves nothing except perhaps making the people feel good about the politicians.
Maybe we should just legalize most illegal drugs. End the war on drugs here and it should help the situation in Mexico.
HEAR, HEAR! At least marijuana, not sure what others? Tax the heck out of it, like alcohol and cigarettes, control it in the same manor, as to age, no driving while "high" and so on.
The answer to the drug problem is to end the spectacularly failed costly Drug War.
They say the Drug War is over. Don't be fooled. As long as drugs remain criminalized the Drug War will never be over.
When is the U.S. government going to finally realize that it can't legislate morality? Many people believe the answer to solving our drug problem is to simply tell people to say "no" to drugs but after being in practice for decades now the evidence shows this has failed miserably. People have been doing drugs for thousands of years and it's never going to stop. There will always be people who do drugs and those who become addicted.
Didn't we learn from the mistakes of Alcohol Prohibition in the 1920s/30s? It didn't work then, and drug prohibition certainly isn't working now. The failed Drug War has cost the U.S. taxpayers over a trillion dollars and has been in force for over seven decades. And the real tragedy here is all of the violence that has been associated with the Drug War and illegal drug trafficking. Drugs are more readily available and the Drug War has created a black market, gangs in every U.S. state, and powerful violent cartels south of the border and in other countries.
The laws have done more damage to this country than the drugs themselves. We have created more criminals out of drug users/addicts who should really be treated as medical patients. Wouldn't we be better off spending the Drug War funding on education, drug treatment and rehabilitation instead of failed law enforcement and incarceration? And not having to build more prisons?
We need to reevaluate our position on drug use in this country. I firmly believe we should decriminalize all drugs. Legalize marijuana and regulate it like alcohol in regards to the law, and create an atmosphere that doesn't stigmatize the drug user. I would never advocate anyone use dangerous hard drugs like meth, cocaine, heroin, etc. But the fact of life remains people will choose to use such drugs and become addicted. Countries in Europe have tried different strategies that have reduced the problems associated with drug use. Why can't the U.S. take these same approaches? We should adopt programs for hard drugs (meth, coke, heroin,etc.) like the Swiss heroin program (where addicts can get their drugs from medically supervised clinics) which has shown positive results in reducing violent crime and HIV infections and helps drug addicts to become stable and productive members of society.
Locking people up and throwing away the key is not the answer. When someone has a real drug problem and is addicted their main focus will always be to obtain and use drugs, regardless of any law. And putting a mark on someone's permanent record that will follow them for the rest of their lives will only hinder them to become productive members in society in getting jobs, student financial aid, etc.
There are many people against legalizing and/or decriminalizing drugs and have expressed many fears and dooms day scenarios but evidence has revealed this would simply NOT be the result. Portugal decriminalized drugs in 2001 and none of the nightmare scenarios touted by preenactment decriminalization opponents have become a reality.
And what are the ramifications of manufacturing, importing, and selling the drugs right here in the U.S? Wouldn't that create a new industry? Jobs? Tax revenue? And stop funding the violent cartels and eventually take away their power?
These are questions that I think once answered, will solve our drug problems and the days of the Drug War will be history.
"If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich" -- John F. Kennedy .
OneDirtyRat,
I agree with you completely!
The gov. knows that leagilizeing pot could aleviate a major portion of the debt,boost the economy, and relive some of the strain on the judicial and prision systems. I remain convinced that too many people are making too much money off it remaining illegal. jails recive the bail money,courts get the fines, the police get the confiscated cash, the lawyers get their outrages fees and I know from personal experience that a few hundred dollars gets a pot charge turned into malicous mischeif, a few more and it goes away entirely. So while the ammount of money that could be generated by legalization would be greater the people who reap the profits now would not recive it. Which in turn means the corupt politicians would have to suplement their income in other ways in order to keep little buffy happy
I dont think you understand politicians at all. They don't need to end drug abuse, they just need to appear to be fixing it. Thats what wins votes. If they get on stage and make it look like they are being proactive on the drug war then they will win votes. It would be political suicide to "go soft" on the drug war because the media will tear them apart. Its all politics.
right.. tax the hell out of it. That way the "new drug war" will be the ATF/IRS getting you for tax evasion instead of the DEA getting you for possession. Cuz you dedicated potsmokers cant hold down a job good enough to pay those "hell" taxes.
President Felipe Calderon on Thursday unveiled a "No More Weapons!" billboard made with crushed firearms and placed near the U.S. border. He urged the United States to stop the flow of weapons into Mexico.
Good for the Mexican President! He should place another billboard in the border of Arizona and other in front of the house or Rick Perry.
Can we use the trash the illegal aliens deposit on their trek through the U.S., after breaking our laws to create a billboard saying no more illegal aliens on Mexico's border? I think it would be more effective if you hung some of the illegal aliens on the board, but....
I think it would be more effective if you hung some of the illegal aliens on the board, but....
You probably are a christian that goes to church every Sunday.....
Hang Illegal Aliens? You need to be arrested!
Somebody call the authorities. Terrorism and hate speech is still a crime in the USA.
Oh puleese! When I first read that the first thing I thought of was hanging them up on a hook by the collar not a noose, until you said something. Still alive of course with the same amount of food and water to survive, that they normally take with them on their illegal trek into the USofA. You probably are an illegal and it was not hate speech. If it was written in a book that you were reading would it be considered HATE SPEECH?
f**ck president calderon this is the same piece of @!$%# that came to our country & before the house & senate said we need to change our views on illegal aliens & the democrats gave him a standing ovation, when they themselves do not allow illegals , he has no right to tell us how to run our country he can't even run his own !! besides if you don't think that eric holder & obama are making money on the sale of guns going to mexico your dumber than i thought , and as far as the dems. that gave him a standing ovation they should sot for treason the pieces of @!$%# !!!
A sign about "no more subsidized food" would do better at reduce illegals. Those farmers are coming here cuz they cant compete with the subsidized food we send there. So they have to cross and what's their "skill", farming. This is a big chunk of the unacccompanied males who send money back to their families.
NMEast, you are suspended for a week for violating rule # 5 of the Code of Honor.
Wow. Really? How about one on our side that says "No more drugs and illegals"? Better yet. How about a Berlin style wall going down the whole boarder. The whole gun fiasco was very wrong, but you should not throw rocks when living inside a glass house.
The right-wing isn't going to like this, they love their guns. And hate Mexicans.
Guns are a constitutional right. Illegals are, well. illegal.
" You can pry my gun from my cold dead fingers" !!!
Why, do you plan to be buried with your guns?
Better...what planet have you been living on?
There are a lot of liberal Democrats who own guns for hunting and sport shooting and even more of them who are sick and tired of the situation with illegals.
We here in the US have one of the easiest countries to legaly enter. If you cant get in legaly you are probaly not the kind of people we want or need here. Hell americans cant even go to Cannada if they've been convicted of a dui.
When in the friggin world did breaking the law and defending the bill of rights become a bi-partisan issue "Better Careful." Are you liberals so blinded by hatred of conservatives that you would mock ANY of the bill of rights, or defend ANY breaking of laws? If your party stance is "Screw laws and screw the constitution" then you deserve a one way ticket out of this Country.
capncaveman I agree. Also my family came over here legally from Scandinavia. They didn't need liberals to hold their hands across the border, they paid the fees, took the test, and got a job. Novel concept.
Capncaveman said:
We here in the US have one of the easiest countries to legaly enter. If you cant get in legaly you are probaly not the kind of people we want or need here. Hell americans cant even go to Cannada if they've been convicted of a dui.
Tell this guy we have one of the easiest countries to legally enter:
Vancouver psychotherapist Andrew Feldmar has been barred from entering the United States. The reason? During a random stop-and-search at a US/Canadian border crossing, a Google search of his name led to his article from the Spring 2001 'Janus Head: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Continental Philosophy, Phenomenological Psychology, and the Arts.' In it Feldmar describes two acid trips he took under the supervision of his graduate advisor in psychology -- in 1967. This turns out to have been enough to earn him a life-time ban under the grounds of 'admitted drug use.'
How about we make a deal, Mr. Calderon? You stop the drugs your worthless people are bringing into the U.S., and we will stop the guns coming over. The other choice would be for the U.S. to round up every illegal alien in this country, give them guns and send them back across the border to become your army. Then, they can shoot the drug dealers for you, since your own army is as corrupt as your government and can't be trusted. The ones left at the end of the fight could then have a fast track to U.S. citizenship, as long as they pass a background and health check.
You stop the drugs your worthless people are bringing into the U.S., and we will stop the guns coming over.
What an ignorant comment. Ask all the farmers in the red states that are prosecuting the poor Mexicans that pick crops.
I do not see a lot of white, unemployed americans getting in line to pick crops,and the farmers are losing their crops because nobody wants to pick them. The people in "occupy Wall Street"are not running there to get a job....
How about solve the problem of immigration without calling people "worthless"
Worthless people? What a silly one sided unbalanced statement.
The USA has a consumption problem; # 1 in the world.
Before Mexico supplied her, Columbia did, China and many other countries. Stopping Mexico from selling drugs to U.S. consumers will only push another to take her place.
Your Mr. Simpleton statement topped with a sprinkle of contempt and racism exposes your ignorance and lack of taking personal responsibility for a failed culture within your beloved USA.
NMEast..."You stop the drugs your worthless people are bringing into the U.S..
Not sure how you interpret that, given the current situation, any other way than the drug lords and drug runners are worthless people. They are the ones bringing drugs into the country.
Am I missing something? Since when were drug lords not "worthless". I think the average human being sees these life-destroying, murderous thugs in terms much worse than "worthless".
IRESPOND
Care to back those words with a statistic and cite a site? Not a news story grabbing headlines but an actual web site where crop loss is broken down by cause and effect. I have yet to hear of a shortage in the stores for ANY food product never mind one caused by lack of pickers. There IS a drought in some regions that has caused crop loss and some mild price increases.
While farming is LESS seasonal these days, the HARVEST is generally late September through December. Plenty of time to report a labor shortage causing those "losses"
how about less government about what we can do. Is this a new idea? why do we get in the way of the drugs and put people in prison that we pay for, for using drugs. Stop spending my money on prisons, and enforcement of something people should decide on themselves if they want to throw themselves in a grave. We have enough people for examples! aka Jackson, Houston, Elvis, Cobain, KEITH RICHARDS ENOUGH SAID
Care to back those words with a statistic and cite a site?
With pleeasure for all of you:
http://weareamericastories.org/2011/10/alabama-immigration-law-hurting-farmers/
There are many others. Just goolge them, and you will find out. I am not writing trash and bigotry, as many people in this vine are.
The bigots are the people who hire illegals and condone them coming to the U.S.
Mexico (government) and the Mexican people will never make intense efforts to better their country so long as the U.S. is an escape from that responsibility.
Nothing will ever change in any of the illegals country of origin as long as they have a means of escape from taking responsibility for themselves. Everyone who hires an illegal to help them out is committing a human rights violation because they are condemning the next generation in that country to the same fate.
Congress just had a series of hearing about the H2A visa program. Those farmers testified about lost crops or not planting in the first place cuz they cant rely on getting pickers. And despite what people think, picking crops in not an unskilled job. You have to know when to each piece (depending on crop) and pickers know this cuz they're mexican farmers who couldnt compete against the subsidized food we export to mexico.
Am I missing something? Since when were drug lords not "worthless". I think the average human being sees these life-destroying, murderous thugs in terms much worse than "worthless".
Although I agree with you that the drug lords are garbage, most of the corruption is not at the lowest level. The people making nasty comments here are talking about the poor fellow that is making a low wage to feed his family.
I am against illegal alliens as much as everybody else, but not every illegal is Mexican, and not every Mexican is a drug dealer.
It just won't stop will it? It's the fault of Law Abiding citizens of the United States that criminals in Mexico are buying Military grade weapons, real assault rifles,grenades, rocket launchers, tanks etc from South America and Argentina even from their own corrupt military etc... Law abiding citizens in the U.S. do not have access to that grade of weapons so how is it our fault. Even some f the civilian grade rifles etc are from weapons our Govt sells to Mexico. What needs to be done is close the border and prosecute the criminals to the fullest extent of the law. That includes Holder and company.....When will people ever learn, if you do nothing, nothing changes...
The U.S. wants Mexico to stop the illegal flow of drugs into the U.S. Mexico wants the U.S. to stop the illegal flow of weapons into Mexico. That flow enables drug lords to ship illegal drugs into the U.S. at the expense of thousands and thousands of Mexican lives. And...more and more U.S. lives are also being lost as the violence spreads across the border into the U.S.
Sounds like the U.S. is the root cause and has to be the root solution. So, we (the U.S.) need to stand up, take ownership, and be accountable.
If we are the supreme super power we think we are, then we need to act like one by ending the illegal flow of weapons into Mexico.
We are also a nation of individuals with rights and liberties. So, let's individually assume responsibility and stop waiting for the DEA and other U.S. and Mexican government agencies to somehow fix these problems that we as individuals created.
(c) 2012
We need to be like any other super power and close and secure our boarder. A large wall with sufficient well armed border agents and National guard troops should just about take care of the problem.
marcm-1194035 wrote:
As long as huge profits are being made by someone in the U.S., it's really not a "problem." But those making the profits will pretend it is, anyway, while bribing those guarding the wall you propose.
Prohibition never stopped the sale of alcohol, either. It just made certain people really, really rich.
Did you think up all this Bullsh*t by yourself? My what a big boy we are....To bad your head is up your a$$, How is it our (U.S.) fault? Mexico wants the U.S. to stop sending weapons? When will you people learn that that the majority of weapons in Mexico are NOT from the U.S. They are from other countries, South America, Argentina, their own corrupt military etc...read the gun trafficking reports from the ATF, FBI etc, get your facts straight before making an a$$ out of yourself in public...
Man, I'm surprised that you've had your account for so long! How many times have you been temporarily banned for vulgar personal attacks?
BTW, flagged for "inflammatory"!!!
Most of the weapons that are used by the cartels are military grade, fully automatic weapons. These are not the type of weapons that you can pickup at your local gun store. To purchase and possess them in the US requires a special permit from the BATFE which includes an extensive background check and a huge fee. The majority of weapons used by the cartel are from Central and South American nations and from the Mexican military. Have you ever seen a live grenade in a gun store in the U.S.? Didn't think so.
Have you ever seen how easy it is to convert an AR15 to full auto?
mo nig, you are suspended for a day for violating rule # 1 of the Code of Honor.
Just a day? Whatever! You're in charge...
hey peanut, the conversion kits are so expensive not just anyone can afford them! While they are out there on the blackmarket so to speak, law abiding citizens will not buy them.
To get caught with an unregistered automatic weapon would not be a good thing, tens yrs in fed prison and 10 thousand dollar fine and loss of gun ownership and voting rights. How about them laws and this they do this to citizens of this country. WOW go figure, I guess if you want to break the laws and get by with it just be an illegal.
What a load of crap. If there is any flow of "automatic" weapons to Mexico it is from our government, who sells them buy the tens of thousands to governments all over the globe. As of May 19th, 1986 the buying, registering, or ownership of new fully automatic weapons was banned. Citizens may still own fully automatic weapons, only if it existed, and was registered prior to that date. Therefore the availability of registrable fully automatic firearms is severely limited, and the prices artificially inflated because of it. I don't see anyone paying 12 to 20 thousand dollars for a fully automatic rifle, waiting the 6 to 9 months for the ATF to clear them, then sending that gun to Mexico. Not to mention applying for a class three license(machine gun license) means giving up your 4th Amendment rights, as the ATF can come knocking on your door at any time and inspect your weapon, and if you don't have it you are looking at ten years in prison. Now on to illegal full automatics, if you are caught with 1 illegal full automatic you are looking at 10 years to life. This is not something the ATF plays around on, so it is supremely unlikely anyone other than our government is supplying full automatics to Mexico. Interesting fact, Obama has increased the number of firearms the State Department has sold to Mexico by 250% over even what Bush sold them.
And all those guns the U.S. is selling them are NOT going to that "ONE LEGAL GUN STORE IN MEXICO" either! (or Calderon's government). They're going to the ones with the money--the cartels--the one's that are doing all this heinous killing.
So, what you said is that BOTH Obama and Bush have created these alleged sales of guns to Mexico ?
Who has created the awesome consumption of drugs FROM Mexico, which fuels the violence ? Oh, American citizens......
Who hires illegal immigrants ? Oh,guys like Romney who got caught twice....
Who is it that kills jobs in the USA ? A.) Everyone who buys foreign made vehicles,including construction and farm equipment, and all those goods at Walmart which are made in China and India, and everyone who uses gasoline and diesel fuel which comes in from other countries !
Another interesting FACT : Bush began the program........
liam, that is incorrect. The operation under bush was conducted with cooperation from the Mexican government and law enforcement, and involved a couple of hundred weapons. When it was realized that direct contact could not be kept with the weapons which all had gps trackers on/in them, the program was ended. In obama's case there was no information passed to anyone on the Mexican side of the border, our federal law enforcement officers included. And thousands of weapons were sent to Mexico with the express intent of being discovered at Mexican crime scenes. Plus when ATF officers were asking, no, begging for permission to interdict the weapons, they were told to stand down, and not interfere with their delivery to the drug cartels.
Funny that a "no more weapons" article turns into "no more illegals" response.
US is irresponsible to sell arms to countries that have no gun laws in place.
I suggest you take the matter up with the President and the Attorney General.
Mexico has some of the most strict ownership laws on the planet, hence the average citizen not being able to defend themselves. If you are lucky, and know, or support someone in the government they will grant you the privilege to trek to the ONE gun shop in the country and buy a .22, otherwise forget ever owning more than a slingshot.
happy2008
As opposed to a country that sell drugs into another country with lots of laws in place? The gun selling was wrong. Very wrong. and heads should roll for it. But it is very hypocritical for mexico to put up a sign like that when for decades they have allowed the flow of illegals and drugs into this country.
You think gun laws would really matter in Mexico??? LOL!
I'm pretty sure it is unlawful to kill someone yet there is plenty of murder there!
No gun laws in place??????? And who would that be? It's illegal to own any gun in Mexico that will shoot any military cartridge. That would be 9mm, .45, 7.62x39, 30-06, 308/7.62x51, 8mm, 7x51, 50BMG and a host of others. Of course that covers all the "automatic" weapons they're crying about. Horse crap. Clean up your own mess, Mexico. Clean up your police and military. How about a little help on the border with your standing army?
bagdadjoe said:
Clean up your police and military. How about a little help on the border with your standing army?
See this article:
When a young corporal in the Mexican marines was ambushed by drug cartel gunmen in the state of Tamaulipas, his first thoughts were for his pregnant wife and unborn child.
But within a split second, he was focused on combat, as his unit took defensive positions around their convoy to return fire.
They managed to shoot dead four attackers while only suffering two injuries.
The victory — one of many by Mexico's marines — was helped largely by U.S.-supplied equipment and training with the U.S. Northern Command in Colorado.
"We have learned from American officers who have fought in Iraq and Afghanistan," said the corporal, who asked that his name not be used as he is not authorized to speak to the media.
"The Americans suffer from similar types of ambushes in their wars, and have learned how to respond to them in a tight, disciplined way. We apply those techniques to our fight here."
Extensive training of the Mexican marines is one of several ways in which the U.S. military machine has quietly escalated its role in Mexico's ultraviolent drug war in the past two years.
The U.S. has also supplied Mexico with state-of-the-art military hardware, including Black Hawk helicopters and surveillance drones.
Furthermore, CIA operatives and American military contractors were recently posted at a Mexican military base to advise directly on operations, according to The New York Times.
The question of U.S. military involvement in Mexico came into the national spotlight this week after Republican presidential hopeful Rick Perry contemplated American troops shooting it out with cartel hit squads.
"It may require our military in Mexico working in concert with them to kill these drug cartels and keep them off our border," Perry said.
The U.S.-trained marines have become the most efficient force in the Mexican military. Directed by Mexico's Navy Department, the marines have been increasingly favored by U.S. officials over the past two years.
In one diplomatic cable uncovered by WikiLeaks, former Ambassador Carlos Pascual praised the marines for their "emerging role as a key player in the counternarcotics fight."
Following training with the U.S. Northern Command, the marines have shot dead several major cartel bosses, including Arturo Beltran Leyva, alias "The Beard," and Ezequiel "Tony Tormenta" Cardenas.
On Wednesday, the marines took charge of a security operation in the port of Veracruz, where thugs dumped 35 corpses on a road during rush hour in September.
The Mexican marines are helped by the fact that most have a higher level of education than those in the Mexican army or federal police, the marine corporal said.
"We are considered to be the yuppies in the Mexican military," he said. "Me and most of my colleagues have university degrees. A lot of regular soldiers come from poor villages and left school when they were 16."
The Mexican marines are also considered much less corrupt than their counterparts, because they traditionally have been uninvolved in the drug war — and have had less contact with the tempting offers of billionaire traffickers.
We'll keep our guns. You keep your drugs and illegals. We'll build our own resorts and keep our tourism dollars as well.
You'll be a third world country overnight. What a joke....
It is illegal to use or sell illegal drugs. The US doesn't seem to be able to control its own "illegals" with much greater resources than Mexico.
4th world country
Why did the Mexican President not simply phone our Dear Leader??
Ya mean our Marxist in chief Obammy? LOL.
@Oliver,
LOL! Educate yourself on socialism.
Your right Wanker, he is not a Marxist, he is a socialist.
The word which you meant is "You're", and Obama is NOT a Socialist....but Romney ? ...he created Romney care in Massachusetts.
When women wanted the right to vote in 1920,...Republicans called them Socialists, when Americans sought a minimum wage law in 1916,Republicans called the opponents Socialists,When Americans sought Workers Comp.Insurance laws,Republicans called them Socialists, When workers sought Worker safety laws, Republicans called them Communists.....There are a lot of Nazis hidden behind the curtains of the Republican Party.
Weapons are the USA # 1 industry!
No More Weapons? That's like us telling Mexico, NO MORE TACOS!
War is a racket and the USA is #1. The real question is "how to get the USA off its insatiable diet of weapons, war, drugs, and exporting global misery in the guise of freedom, liberty, and democrazy?". $$$$
You got that right, tools of death and destruction are the only major things the United States has left to export that people want to buy.
The flow of illegal weapons. Bull. Those weapons are bought legally here, and if they are illegal there, that is their problem.
What Mexico needs is for the people to stop working for the drug lords which includes most of their military and politicians and stop waiting for someone to come in and take control.
WE have NO business getting involved in their problems. We have enough of our own problems.
As usual a number of highly uninformed people are making numerous comments about illegals and drugs. The problem with Mexico is this countries unsatiable desire for illegal drugs. If Americans weren't spending billions of dollars buying them, no one would be transporting them. The drug war has failed, it is time to think the unthinkable and legalize drugs, it is the only solution to all of the violence. Any well informed thinking man in the world knows this. endprohibitionnow.net.
What we need to do is to end the easy accessiblity of guns to Americans, who obviously misuse the privilege,.....something like 38 Americans a day are killed with legal guns in the USA...
liam... please cite your site. at best/worst it is 27 people a day in the USA die from gun use, legal or illegal, and about half die by their own hand, suicide.
President Obama promise of "Hope" and "Change"
I respectfully suggest that you issue their full pardon to all cannabis prisoners
Mr. President Obama, I am hereby respectfully requesting that your exercise your executive privilege as President of the United States and that you grant full pardons, vindication and subsequent removal of their felony convictions of all cannabis prisoners
LEGALIZE IT, DON’T CRITICIZE IT!
LEGALIZE FREEDOM because
How about we send them a sign - No More illegal immigrants!
Or, how about, Stand up to your drug cartels!
Or how about Americans stop buying drugs from Mexico?
BTW3110:
That will NEVER happen. Try again.
To think magically one day drug use in the U.S. is going to disappear is naive to say the least.
A better idea would be to end the spectacularly failed and costly drug war.
President Obama promise of "Hope" and "Change"
I respectfully suggest that you issue their full pardon to all cannabis prisoners
Mr. President Obama, I am hereby respectfully requesting that your exercise your executive privilege as President of the United States and that you grant full pardons, vindication and subsequent removal of their felony convictions of all cannabis prisoners
LEGALIZE IT, DON’T CRITICIZE IT!
LEGALIZE FREEDOM because
because then you can post stupid off-topic comments?
The drug war is definitely tied to this article and is certainly not off topic and donataso's post makes perfect sense...and is NOT stupid.
I'm with you, free all marijuana users in jails...the USA has 5% of the World population,but 25% of ALL the people in jails all over the World, are Americans, serving time in American jails........, one out of every 31 adults in the USA is either A.) In jail,B.) On parole, or C.) on Probation....What's with that ?
Is America truly a nation of criminals ?
Wow. Really? How about one on our side that says "No more drugs and illegals"? Better yet. How about a Berlin style wall going down the whole boarder. The whole gun fiasco was very wrong, but you should not throw rocks when living inside a glass house.
If they need to outsource a project I would suggest outsource the wall construction and border protection to either the Germans or Chinese. Those guys know how to build a wall and secure a border. Of course they treat Illegals and invaders differently than we treat "Un documented Workers"
How about we arrest one criminal alien and trade him for one weapon, you guarantee us the criminal alien will stay in Mexico, we guarantee you that weapon will never leave the USA.
We will send Mr Holder to Mexico, to take charge of rounding up weapons.
Eric Holder just another of Obammys criminals.
Racist
ah yes, the cry of the democrat with out facts or anything to say..
Don't forget, "Bush did it".
There was nothing racist about that comment.
Ah you forget liberaleeeter, anytime you criticize GWB you're a patriot and anytime you criticize B.H.O. you're a racist.....damn I didn't know there were so many racists in this country....I can't wait until this country has a different president so people can STFU about the non-existent race card b.s.....
Bipartisan Congressional investigation showed that 2,070 weapons were involved in operation Fast and Furious, yet the article states that 7,500 weapons were destroyed by the Mexican government. Were did the rest come from? Easy to just blame Dems I guess.
Sure the mexicaN gov't destroyed the guns...yeal right.,.,and he thinks we are going to believe him?????