Ok, the violence on the border regions is a symptom of a problem. They are not the root cause. Until we find an intelligent way to deal with drugs in this country, the violence around drug trafficking will continue. If you really think that putting up a wall will stop the flow of drugs into this country, I have a bridge from Texas to New York you can buy, I'll sell it cheap.
I want our borders safe, but I am a realist, which we don't see much of in DC nowadays. Ask your legislator to find a new and effective way to stop the drug war. Until then, your borders will never be safe.
The whole reason the 'war on drugs' was started was because it was correctly recognized as being a root cause of crime, robberies, and murder to begin with. It was an honorable intention and by no means should we 'legalize' such destructive substances. However, I'd be one to admit that there needs to be a change here.
Not long ago, we were responsible for thousands of murders when we supplied guns to the drug traffickers through the program called, "Fast and Furious." A real disaster, for sure.
Many other civilized nations have found that legalizing, regulating, and taxing drugs can result in a unprecedented decrease in illegal, illegitimate, and violent, organized crime.
Unfortunately, most American Farmers, Small Businesses, and individuals, have long sought after the cheap, unregulated, easily-bullied "illegals" to perform legion of unwanted, market-negative jobs.
Any American that hires "illegals," at Third-World prices, for First World comforts, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Americans made the egregious error of their lives by in Barrack Hussein O'Bummer. The only way to put an end to this Immigration corruption is to have the voting Americans stand on principle--and vote this underachieving and unqualified President out of office. His primary concern is to increase relations with the Muslim people around the world, and this makes him dangerous and very much out of touch with the American priorities.
NSAQ is right. It's the desire for cheap goods and cheap labor that has driven the illegal immigration and the issues surrounding the economy in general. It's time the GOP got their heads out of their a**es and started addressing the problem and not the symptom.
Not that they would want to. The problem with both parties is they are answering based on their stock portfolios, as a recent 60 minutes segment on congressional insider trading pointed out. As long as our government is serving big business, the American people will loose.
History has proven that keeping manufacturing in America and products being sold by locally owned small business is key to maintaining a prosperous economy. What we have now is the exact opposite and economists far and wide have been pointing this fact out for years. Our system is designed to focus income toward the top, a pyramid scheme of sorts. And GOP philosophy does nothing but make the problems worse. So my message to the Tea publicans and the generally uneducated on the right is, stand up for your self, get an education in economics and stop voting for single issue items (ie. tax cuts, anit gay, anti abortion), because that is all feed for the cattle and has no substance in the real world.
When will people understand securing the border, and "comprehensive immigration reform" are two ENTIRELY different problems. That is like saying giving amnesty for burglars is the same thing as making sure houses dont get burglarized.
If your water main is broken the FIRST thing you do is turn off the water. THEN you can clean up the mess. Not the other way around.
SECURE THE BORDER!!!!!! After it is secure, then you can decide what happens with those here now.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
I would advise all ranchers to shoot first and ask questions later, you have the right to defend your property. Forget the gov't, the only thing they can do for you is talk. Do what you gotta do.
Many don't understand what the point is to a secure border.Here's what they don't get,because the media doesn't want to talk about real issues.1.If illegals can cross the borders,and drugs get in by the tons,then when will the next dirty nucleur device be smuggled into this country and detonated?. If someone brings a bomb into play,how many terrorists have already made it here?If you ignore the real issues long enough,anything could happen,and will happen.This concerns me a great deal,and what the country is doing to prevent it is even more concerning,because they act like they couldn't care less.I don't want to be in wars the rest of my life.Let's guard against intruders,and keep out the roaches.
We can seal the border. We can seal it the same way we have sealed the DMZ in Korea. We've stopped infiltration there for 60 years with the only tools that actually work. Razor wire. Minefields. Machinegun emplacements with overlapping fields of fire. Artillery firebases. 20,000 American troops.
Total ignorance. How many troops would it take to cover 1200 miles of border versus the 200 the DMZ occupies in Korea? Anti tax Republican philosophy would do nothing to pay for such an expensive endeavor. Get real people. Maybe we should focus on creating more opportunity for Mexicans and less for Chinese. I'm pretty sure it's harder for Chinese to swim to America than it is for Mexicans to cross a 1/10'th of a mile thick border fence.
I have a lot of sympathy for these people. Not only do they live in constant fear from the Mexican traffickers smuggling drugs and illegal immigrants, but from their own government that refuses to address the problem with anything more than lip service. Yes, their own government that promises to vigorously prosecute any of them for daring to defend themselves against these violent intruders.
We need to get the Tx. Army National Guard down there on the border.... that is what they are for, to protect the people of Texas. Also, that group of Volunteers needs to stop looking for a bullet in the head, go do your farm or ranch work, carry your gun, and defend yourself if need be, but stop messing around with what could be you or your families lives.
Goldy.. by your own reasoning, if they died... it was meant, by virtue of guns to advance ideology. I mean... if it is one's responsibility to defend holdings, how is it not another to seek NEW holdings?
I normally read these article comments and agree or disagree only to myself. However I feel my two cents are due, if only to appease my own sense of right and wrong. The general population of the United States is filled with lazy, ignorant, slobs. The "people of Wal-mart" types. If you feel offended byh these comments, load up and go to Wal-Mart and meet with your bretheren. If not, then read on. I will make simple suggestions. One, secure the border. This will be done with the simple use of OUR military, local law enforcement, and citizen volunteers. (Everyone in Texas is a member of the Texas militia) Two, Nation wide there will be an immeadiate deportation reform. This means if you are caught you will be deported, and since you have no proof of citizenship we will choose where to send you(Google operation Wetback). Three, if you are illegal and commit a crime, ie smuggling, you will not serve time, you will be transported to the border and publicly hung! No lethal injections, or rotting in a cell. People who are in this trade are pure trash and have ZERO right to life or liberty. We may have to stoop to a new low, but we have for too long gone to a gun fight with a butter knife! Four, as to our legal citizens who like to dabble in these chemical past times we will be immeadiatley siezing any and all of your possesions, you will then spend the remainder of your sentence, however long, digging the graves of the bastards who you bought the crap from. (With a spoon, by the way) If you have made it this far, welcome, you are seeing the point I am trying to pass along. We are a nation of freeloaders that for too long have been walked on in exchange for freebies and false promises. Everyone who is able, get off your tail, get a job. Put down the crack, smack, or coke. I live in Texas. I own a gun. I know my rights, but better than that I know my abilities! I know I strayed in my rant, but in these times it is difficult not to. God bless America. But before the lord comes we need to clean house!!!
When you have a federal government that sues a state for trying to help. yea, I see your point. Obama and the DEMOCRATS do nothing for this problem. They encourage the entitlement mentality, which is nothing more than a rapidly ending ponzi scheme, to further their own political party instead of addressing the problem. Seal the border FIRST, worry about the illegal aliens here SECOND, not the other way around.
Wet Willy: Your righteous anger should be aimed not at the "government" but rather at the American drug users/addicts who have the excess cash to make drug smuggling so profitable. You and the other lazy conservatives are always looking for the easy way out. You complain about "big government" getting in your way, and then expect them to be "big government" when you have troubles. Well this one's simple, Wet Willy: it's the LAW OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND. Until the people of wealth give up their drug habits/addictions, there will be a war to be the supplier for that addiction. I say send the drug USERS down to defend the border! They can cut out the middle men and make the border areas safer for the rest of us.
I have a simple question. Who do you believe? The government or the ranchers. I believe the ranchers. They are out there where they witness this first hand and on a daily basis, not sitting behind a desk in some office , in some large city, looking at figures then spouting off that our ranchers are safe. I don't have all the answers, but I do know this. What the government is doing now is not the answer...
If someone brings a bomb into play,how many terrorists have already made it here?If you ignore the real issues long enough,anything could happen,and will happen.This concerns me a great deal,and what the country is doing to prevent it is even more concerning,because they act like they couldn't care less.
Calm down! Look at the excellent job our government has done preventing anyone from carrying a full size tube of toothpaste onto an airliner. One thing at a time!
How about Statehood for Mexico? Since polls taken of Mexican citizens indicate over 50% would move north if given the chance, why not move the US to them?then unleash the DEA and the DOJ on the cartels.It's not like we haven't done it before. My ancestor Gen. Winfield Scott did it in 1848. The only reason we didn't annex Mexico outright was that they all would have been slave states. That issue is settled.If we ARE to have union with Mexico, wouldn't it be better accomplished under the US Constitution and the Constitutional mechanism of Statehood than through some nebulous process of Norh American Union?
I've traveled the world over and I've never seen so many people trying to get me addicted to drugs than here in the US. I've had people trying to get me hooked on heroin, cocaine, crack, LSD, weed, meth, speed, you name it.
One way or another I'll end up meeting a friend of a freind who'll sooner than later will try to sell me some freaking oxycodon or xanax or whatever.
I don't mean to make the US look bad but, I swear, I can't think of anyone in any other country I've been to who's ever try to get me hooked on anything but wine, beer or tobacco.
Americans need to seriously get a grip on themselves and find pleasure in the simple things of life like food, and drinks, and each other's company instead of isolating themselves so they can consume the most amount of drugs just so they don't have to deal with the outside world or, God forbid, their own families.
How can any American pretend to care about drug smuggling across their borders while their government carries on a "War On Drugs" whose only purpose is to jail and deprive people of educational and economic opportunities because of their addictions?
I think it is the height of hypocrisy to blame Mexicans, or Colombians, or whomever else, because of a mafia that exists due to the monstrous appetite for drugs Americans have.
Americans need to stop feeling sorry for themselves, get real, and deal with their own problems in a humane and practical way.
FlyingEnergy, do the math. If it takes 20,000 troops to seal a 200 mile border then it will take 6 times that many to seal a 1200 mile border. Oh, look, we have that many being withdrawn from Iraq and Afghanistan. If we aren't to dump them on the domestic unemployment line, we're going to have to find something for them to do. Defending our borders is the primary duty of our armed forces, so lets let them do that.
Poor decrepit violent Mexico would find something to smuggle and make money at Americas expense regardless if we legalized Marijuana..Our troops should be protecting our borders" it has escalated out of control, anybody from any country could come here through back door Mexico this is crazy ignorance.!
If anyone believes these two, then I own the Brooklyn Bridge and will sell it to you cheap.
It is time for the Liberals to consider selecting ANOTHER CANDIDATE to run for President in the next election. Mr. Obama has run the course for on-the-job training and he has failed Domestically and Internationally.
thenew, before the Israelis put up their Berlin Wall they had to withdraw their troops and tanks so they wouldn't get stuck in case of an attack. It's the lack of Israeli troops and military hardware that has led to less Palestinian attacks on the Israelis.
That's something you'll see throughout history and the world over: Get the occupying soldiers out of the way and people will stop attacking them. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.
I like that idea, build the wall as there is loads of sand there for concrete walls. Don't send them back until they get the wall done, then perhaps they could be dropped over the wall. They would be happy to be home.
45,000 people have been killed since President Calderon has been at his "job".
Now, how can Obama let this outrageous leader of Mexico tell America what it can and cannot do. Why doesn't President Obama speak out against this fake leader--all of them are playing both sides.
Meanwhile, Innocent Americans living on the borders are being slaughtered. Yes, slaughtered, just like in Egypt. The top drug cartel Zeta is getting away with murder--put in some Laws---protect our Security Border Officers--Holder did not care about the American Security Border Officer killed weeks ago--he did not acknowlege the event, nor did he call on the man's family to give them his condolences. Holder has to GO, GO, GO!
When will America show that it cares about it's citizens and their lives.
I've never seen anything like what is happening in the US today in my long lifetime. Never.
Speak Out--do something, Mr. President. Forget the wining and dining of other enemy leaders in the WH at State dinners. This job is not a Fraternity party--
Everywhere there is suffering here. No one listens. No Hope, No Change.
I grew up in South Texas. Back in the 70's they crossed hungry, looking for work. Marijuana was being smuggled, kilos, not tons like it is now, along with coke, heroin, & guns. Today the ppl live in fear. They will shoot you in a heartbeat. Islamic terrorist groups are setting up shop in Mexico and forming alarming ties with the country's brutal drug cartels....Hezbollah has been doing this for over 10 years. They are well funded. We need to wake up and take control of our border before they launch a scud missile...A single electromagnetic pulse, or EMP, attack will cause the collapse of the electric power grid, all the critical infrastructures and other electronic systems across the continental United States and basically cause a permanent blackout.
Fighting hard on the WAR ON DRUGS, ALL these years.
LOWERING the corporate tax rate far below Canada's. Our corporate tax rate is HALF of Israel's (as a percentage of GDP)
LOWEST personal tax rate since the 1950s.
So, WHY isn't any of this working?
Maybe, just maybe......The state of the economy doesn't have diddly-doo to do with high taxes, or low taxes.
So then dems and repubs are just spewing lies and crap.
You can be sure that Republicans and Democrats will never secure the border. They both had the opportunity controlling all the houses within the past 8 years. They didn't do squat.
Enough with the lies.
The next time you are asked for your political affiliation....MARK INDEPENDENT!
When it comes down to who can you trust... you still need to add the GOPpers to the "Naughty" list. If they are not lying, then they are exaggerating or trying to disguise in-action with the claim of "studying the situation".
Well Jeb, its the same situation which you guys ignored - to allow cheap labor to get a foot-hold in the country... just how long do you good Ol' boys and "Fat Cats" need study the situation... and allow the border to remain as porous as the bullets holes in the heads of innocent, non-drug using Americans; small farmers, fearful ranchers, out of work construction, manufacturing, truck driving regular folks?
he made the case that with more Border Patrol agents, a border fence and falling crime rates, he has checked border security off the to-do list, and it’s time for Congress to write a legalization bill - an issue that has stalled since 2007, when it failed in a dramatic bipartisan filibuster on the Senate floor.
“We have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement. All the stuff they asked for, we’ve done,” he said.
“But even though we’ve answered these concerns, I’ve got to say I suspect there are still going to be some who are trying to move the goal posts on us.”
The farmer said a federal law enforcement agent told him to buy a bulletproof vest to use while working in his fields.
The Obama administration and many local officials have said the U.S.-Mexican border is safer than ever and that reports of violence on the American side are wildly exaggerated.
I'm inclined to believe the obama administration since they would never have cause to lie to the American public. They have no agenda to push. Besides, who would know better what is happening in south Texas, the local law enforcement and farmers or the politicians on capital hill?
My righteous anger is aimed at exactly where it should be aimed, which is the "government". The solution is not big government but legalization of marijuana at least. By now, only people that live in caves are the ones that believe this so-called war on drugs has any effect at all save for filling prisons and enriching drug cartels, not to mention maintaining a large government bureaucracy.
There should be a "Castle Doctrine" where people have immunity from prosecution for defending themselves from these intruders, so long as it's done on their land, and is something a number of states have already adopted.
Actually, from your post you seem more like the conservative you accuse me of being.
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
The real question folks need to be asking themselves..is just where do our so called elected politicans stand on this issue ? If anyone has been paying attention..you will notice that all latino's are being bowed down too for votes...which allows illegals all the time they need . Placing blame on Obama would be silly since every politican in congress wants the vote of the friends of illegals....including of course now Obama..but this has been going on longewr than Obama has been president..if complaints are to be made they have to be directed at our elected in congress, who do noting but protect their votes...protecting this country means little to nothing and protecting its people mean even less. Protecting our borders should be of great concern for politicans ..it is not.
This "President" huh? Considering almost every darn thing he has to do has to be ok'd by the congress and senate, Why aren't you asking, When is All our elected officials going to become Americans and defend this country. And you can keep asking, because out even if the Democratic President said he wanted a fence built now, you can bet that the Republicans will come up with a reason not to. There is no doubt in my mind. And if you think that isn't true, you haven't watched the news.
This president is essentially useless when it comes to fulfilling the oath of office which he took. In that oath he swore to uphold and PROTECT the territorial soverignity of the United States. Rather than doing so, he panders for hispanic votes. I have news for him, there are many hispanic ranchers and farmers whose lives are in danger as a result of his inaction. They vote. As to getting congress involved, they're too busy making money from insider trading and other boondoggles to pay any attention to concerns amongst the citizens.
The areas are huge and when a law enforcement officer tells a rancher to arm himself and wear a bulletproof vest....well, that is beyond pathetic.
When is this " President" going to become an American and defend this country?
Probably about the same length of time as all of his predecessors. Did you ask them the same question? What was their answer? This one's probably the same as the last one's.
Obama is not deporting them in 'record numbers' contrary to what the spin is. Most are left alone, hell, he told the DOJ to ignore those without a criminal record. Then you have the deported who return to commit crime after crime after crime and what's done about it? Nada. As to Bush, the situation on the border these days is far worse than during Bush's term. Also, Obama is the president and has been for over three years now. Blaming Bush for Obama's current ineptitude and disregard for protecting the citizens he was elected to serve, well, good luck but the excuses are beyond lame and border on the pathetic.
I don't - I blame the knee jerk idiot American public who has been sold a bill of goods propaganda against drugs for the last 50 years which has made any effort to deal with it realistically almost impossible. You want to stop the drug war and border violence? Then decriminalize and legalize drugs and get rid of the DEA bureaucracy which is the root cause of all the violence and gigantic costs.
You can't expect your government to be any smarter than the jerks who have been electing them. You want to blame somebody...here's a mirror. Enjoy.
Dan has a valid point, more illegals have been deported during this administration than during any other in recent memory. Does that mean the border is "safer than ever"? No. But does it mean the federal government is doing a lot more about solving this problem than it used to? Yes. But that is apparently still not nearly enough.
It probably doesn't help matters when the governor of Texas -- the state that shares the longest border with Mexico -- does something like grant in-state college tuition to illegal immigrants. Good job Rick Perry. You are just the conservative darling, aren't you?
"The Obama administration and many local officials have said the U.S.-Mexican border is safer than ever and that reports of violence on the American side are wildly exaggerated."
Yup - spoken well by a politicil lap dog 3000 miles away. I wonder if this "administration official" has ever stepped FOOT in Texas.
President Obama has no interest in upholding Constitutional law regarding illegal alien traffic in the U.S. Why? Because President Obama's popularity numbers are way down and he doesn't want to lose the Hispanic Community vote in 2012. So, who pays the price? Every American dealing with job loss, border crime, illegal gang, drug and weapons traffic in America.
Why should any of this surprise any of you... After all, President Obama initiated a lawsuit against the State of Arizona for taking illegal alien related traffic and crimes in their own hands. What do you expect, when you have a President who is more interested in "Face Time on Letterman" than honoring the "Oath of Office to Uphold the Constitution."
FYI, there are signs up along the southern Arizona borders warning Americans "drive through this area at your own risk." This is do to the heavy occupation of illegal aliens and related border crime issues.
And Democrats wonder why the rest of America is fed up with Obama! 2012 can't get here fast enough for me......
"Despite government assurances that they're safe, they say the level of violence in rising"
Well, any time you have this current administration telling you one thing, always, and I do mean ALWAYS, run in the opposite direction. Let's give it up for Big Sis Janet warning us about frying turkeys! Woohoo! Anyone need a government-issued band-aid for those oil pops that burned your skin?
atleast Obama is deporting more of them since the Eisenhower administration
You Obamabots love living in your own lies, don't you?
Well first of all, if the US didn't have a drug problem they wouldn't have a market What is fascinating to me is that the ONLY young adults and grownups that I know that often use drugs are liberals. Of course most young adults today are liberals because they want somebody to take care of them and so they look to government to be all things for them. The older folks still taking drugs are the baby boomer hippies many camouflaged in suits today. I will however admit this. Many boomers and many of the young adults today have an alcoholic problem as well. Neither vice is good, but even when Hillary Clinton pointed out that if there wasn't a market for drugs they wouldn't be smuggling the drugs in to this country and still the public ignored here as well. We are just plain STUPID.
I am extremely sad for those living on the borders because our government is basically calling them liars. Obama and democrats support open borders and do not want to clamp down on anything that could be construed as anti-Mexican. They want and need the future votes. It is that simple and that is why they are making this a political issue instead of a national security issue. It boggles the mind that if our borders are so porous why can't terrorists transport dangerous weapons etc, into this country.
We have spent billions in the name of democracy in the ME with really zero success. Imagine how much border enforcement could have been done with that money?
I own a good bit of land and consider every inch MINE. To know that smugglers were using that land to pollute my country and put humans in physical harm makes me sick. Walk in their shoes for a moment, and imagine how it would feel to have people move in and out of your house or across your lawn when they felt like it and threaten you on top of that.
Our government regarding this matter and so many others is a complete failure.
That's funny theboy's, my experience is the exact opposite, so is the Congressional budget offices experience. 3 to 1, that is the amount of money spent on welfare in red states compared to blue states. I personally know more Republican's children use drugs than democrat's unless you count marijuana as a drug, then it's probably equal. And more people are arrested on drug charges in red states than blue states. These are cold hard facts that can't be denied, so your gonna have to clarify your apparent, "feelings", about the issues.
How is this Obama's fault. What did GW do that Obama isn't to stop the problem? What did Reagan do? I'm sorry but I think this is an economics problem not a presidential problem. You would know that if you knew how the government worked. Checks and balances, it's as much a Republican problem as it is Obamas, so cut the crap.
OBAMA has an UNCLE and an AUNT ZATUNI here in the USSR of Massachusetts that are here illegally, do you think he cares about us Americans ???? His auntie Zatuni is living in public housing and has been ordered to be deported twice before she was granted the big OK by her nephew!!!!
William McGonagle, deputy director of the Authority, stated Onyango did a good job as a public health advocate on behalf of the Boston Housing Authority.[3][21] Described as a frail woman who walks with cane, she lives in flat normally set aside for people facing physical hardship.
[1] As of 2008 Onyango worked as a volunteer computer systems co-ordinator for the Experience Corps, a program in which adults over 55 mentor children in their communities.[1] McGonagle added "We have no affirmative responsibility I am aware of to further check on their status after they are initially deemed to be eligible."
People are granted citizenship by the hundreds of thousands every year in America. I'm sure a good citizen that has contributed all she could while she was able, and continues to contribute even with a disability would be a great choice for permanent citizenship.
Why would would you think any different? This argument seems more about Obama than actual policy.
Lucy et al: when will the drug users/addicts give up their habits so the drug smuggling will stop. You conservatives - if you only had even half a brain, you would understand that this is a war brought about by the LAW OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND. If the Americans who have the excess cash to pay for their drug addiction/habit STOPPED, there would be no DEMAND and no cash, and SUPPLY would vanish. No more border wars. Lucy and you other simpletons: address the ROOT CAUSE, not the RESULT. Don't blame the President or "the government." Blame your family, friends and neighbors whose drug habits fuel these border wars.
For ALL you people that blame Bush or President Obama, just let me say they ALL are working for the New World Order to destroy America.
Open borders, every language other than English being spoken, no domestic energy developmment of any account, continued deIndustrialization of our manufactorin base, and the bankruptcy of our nation is ALL intentional by the Trans National Global ELITE BANKSTERS destroying the American Middleclass so they can impliment their New World Order.
Bush I, II, CLinton and Presidnet Obama are ALL Agency developed. Different puppets, same puppst masters!
David in WI, Why did President Obama unleash the Justice Department and the DEA to bust LEGAL medical marajana growers in Cali when Bush left them alone? Could the 500 Thousand he just get bundled by the Pharma companies worrriwed over decreasing Zanax sales or could it be the illegal Mexican drugs trade being hurt?
"
You conservatives - if you only had even half a brain, you would understand that this is a war brought about by the LAW OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND. If the Americans who have the excess cash to pay for their drug addiction/habit STOPPED, there would be no DEMAND and no cash, and SUPPLY would vanish. No more border wars. Lucy and you other simpletons: address the ROOT CAUSE, not the RESULT. Don't blame the President or "the government." Blame your family, friends and neighbors whose drug habits fuel these border wars."
Could da President be a right wing conservative? LOL!
@3.17 -- Ronzwyf, those signs in southern AZ have been there since long before Obama took office...because the drug traffickers have been there that long too. The areas where those signs are posted are very remote and mostly uninhabited -- a desert national monument and an Indian reservation. The only way you would ever see one of those signs is on a hike or off-road excursion. There is a reason the drug smugglers and human smugglers prefer that region -- precisely because it is so empty of settlements and so difficult to patrol. We're not talking about someone's ranch, we're talking about a huge land area that is so hostile and desolate, it is a smuggler's dream.
Regarding Arizona"s immigration law, it was no surprise that the Feds sued the state on the grounds that only the federal government can make immigration law, not the states. The author of that law, Russel Pearce, was so unpopular in his home district that he recently became the first AZ legislator in history to be recalled from office in a special recall election. He was replaced by another Republican who believes that we have more than just one issue to be concerned about...like maybe the economy and jobs and a business-friendly tax environment. Pearce was single-minded in his pursuit of illegal immigrants and challenging the Feds at all costs, and the voters in his district decided that was not really what they had in mind when they elected him.
Mexico complains about guns coming from the US but let me tell you about how mexico controls their borders. I took a trip to Nougalas 2 years ago and when I crossed the border into mexico I saw people carrying suitcases and duffle bags through the gate and there were no mexican border officers on duty. How many fire arms went through that gate. But it took me 2 hours to get back into the USA
Hey Joe, you think the rest of us don't watch the news? Newsflash for you...our current president is pleased with the border situation. He thinks the border is fine the way it is and he fights the states that say otherwise. I really hope he has trouble sleeping at night knowing that there are US citizens afraid to walk their own property because he will do nothing to try and change the border situation! Shame on you Mr. president for not standing up for the citizens of the United States.
Shame on you Fab Five for being ignorant of your own history. This problem has been decades in the making -- a problem exacerbated by Republican administrations who gave amnesty and otherwise looked the other way because "cheap labor is good for business" -- and now that we finally have an administration that is deporting more illegals than ever before, and has increased boots on the ground at the border, all you can say is "shame on you Mr. president"? You really should educate yourself before posting misinformed opinions.
Ignoring all the fools who want to somehow make this a political issue, I'll say this: the war on drugs has caused this mess in the first place, and we are the country that gave these criminals their guns. So, having admitted that we screwed up, where do we go from here? I have a few suggestions.
1) Legalize the drugs and set up a government agency to produce them. Not Big PHARMA, more on that in a second. I don't say legalize them because I use them, because I don't, and in most cases, due to my own weird brain chemistry, can't. I know it will cause a spike in addiction in the U.S., at least temporarily. That's the price we have to pay.
2) Make it illegal to grow or produce any drugs outside what the government controls, in every state. That may seem redundant, and a part of the war on drugs, but it's not really. The reason will follow.
3) Most people don't know this, but the sole contribution that Reagan had on the fall of the Soviet Union was the arms race. We out-spent Russia, and that went a long way to destabilizing the government there. This will be the reverse. The government makes the drugs available everywhere, always underselling any street value. This is a price-war, so independent growers/producers would destabilize the effort.
4) Station troops returning from Afghanistan in hot zones as a precaution.
5) Finally, buy any crops we can get our hands on directly from the farmers. This is just to let more air out of the balloon, and won't work in most cases. It's been suggested for years that we just pay the farmers for their crops. In theory, that sounds good, but the profit for the farmers is short lived if the cartel shoots them the next day for selling their product. Most people leave that out of the logic.
In the end, we put the cartels out of business by cutting the price of product so that everyone gets what they want from the government. In the meantime, we beef up the security along the boarder. I have no problem with migrant workers, but I also have no problem with shooting at drug dealers on sight. In the end, we increase and heavily tax the drugs we sell, having created a safer boarder and put the cartels in the poor house. Add to it rehab programs and informational commercials, and, in a generation, we bring use down, while keeping the product safe, and putting all the money into the government.
Everyone wants to blame the Mexicans for this problem. It's foolish. WE are the consumers. WE gave them the guns. WE made it into big business with the war on drugs. It's OUR fault, and WE need to fix it.
The painful irony is that we blame the cartels for making life bad, but excuse our own corporations for essentially the same behavior, and in both cases, the people want to spend less to have a smaller government, but they want that same underfunded government to fix the problems. I never thought I'd see the day when Americans were so bad at adding and subtracting.
You may now go back to pointing fingers at each other while the boarder states burn.
I like your ideas, but unfortunately the drug war is a political issue, and the government has much to be gained by perpetuating it...even if that means allowing the Mexican cartels to thrive...not to mention the Afghan opium lords, whose fields have been protected by our our own brave military men and women.
But for what it's worth, the border states aren't exactly burning. It's business as usual, except for these occasional media stories about some rancher who feels unsafe...just like he has felt for the last 10 or 15 years. Not exactly newsworthy...just a reminder of a long-standing problem.
If our government can post 26,500 armed US troops in South Korea to protect their border and country, why can't our government post 26,500 US troops on our border to protect our country?
Well, lets see here, War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Terror and I'm probably neglecting a few other 'wars' which have solved what, exactly? Well, they have created jobs for many, many bureaucrats so guess there's a positive side...right?
This is absolutely disgusting. America Citizens living in real danger and fear because our complacent Government wants to destroy the Country give it away to Mexico? Where is Obama and Janet? Why aren't they down there walking the land with these men and women? Border " safer than ever" my eye. Shame on America for this!!!! Shame on all the Illegal lovers for this! Sham on the legal Mexican Citizens and Laraza for not speaking up against this violence against America Citizens.
Someone on this thread needs to read some history. I would suggest starting with Moses Austin and his son, Stephen F. Austin and Santa Anna. After that, work your way back. Americans didn't steal anything from Mexico.
how is it that we "stole " the land when after the texans defeated santa anna he signed over the land in exchange for his own life i think you should look up the definition of the word first
Nana, you're naive if you don't think that Janet and Obama aren't aware of what's happening and aren't concerned. But this is a Mexico issue first, and an American concern second. The only recourse we have is to use the drones to kill the smugglers. I can guarantee you that that's on the drawing board. Because in a way not only are they violating sovereign land, they are acting like terrorists - threatening American citizens.
Read the Terrorist and Patriot Acts....the drones are coming.
Ya really need to shut up! this is our land! its our ancestors land! we own this land! ya are from across the world. just because a couple of hundred years ain't going to give you the right of calling it yours when its been ours for thousands of years. Just shut the hell up!
Nana, you are totally right. Let's raise taxes on the rich, so we can afford to properly defend our boarders. It's disgusting that we won't even pony up to defend ourselves.
BTW, do you see the racism in your own statement? Legal aliens speaking out against violence against American citizens? News flash: Legal aliens is an oxymoron. They are called American citizens, and it sounds like Americans are speaking out about the violence against us all plainly enough.
this will continue, the demand is always there and the farmers are scared to death, which i don't blame them. so what are they to do? the only way this will ever end is for the military to get involved. this will continue until something happens and the politicians get on obama to do something. but for now just wave at the smugglers and say hello. its that or get shot.
Our military has been involved with fighting the drug war for decades, don't kid yourself. The only way this ends somewhat peacefully and within our lifetimes is when prohibition is declared a failure -- again! If you think that sounds nuts, listen to what the good folks from Law Enforcement Against Prohibition have to say and consider that our current laws 1.) do not work; and, 2.) empower criminal organizations and terrorist networks everywhere while undermining the legitimacy of our government and the rule of law in general.
It's high time our politicians embrace the truth, or stop pretending to be public servants. The military industrial complex must be confronted for the vicious beast it has become, or violence like this is only the beginning..
Future democrat voters, he won't rest until someone is killed...Oh wait, several people have been killed, Americans have been killed. Guess getting Quadaffi and making the world a safer place for the oil companies is more important.
the politicians will never do anything but lie and deceive to get their way into office and then proceed to trick the trusting voters that they are doing anything but filling their pockets it is up to the citizens to right this wrong, our "leaders " have not/will not do anything until we initiate the change.....rise up america we cannot afford to be lazy any longer
I don't know; much of the military - particularly the U.S. Marines in which my husband currently serves - are visibly Latino. Like Islamic terrorists, Latino drug cartels are the biggest murderers of their own people. Since my husband's been a recruiter, we often hear of boys going back home to LA or further south, being identified by their physical features, and killed because they're suspected of belonging to a rival gang. Many have left gangs to join the Corps. Militarizing out borders with Latinos is a very bad idea and will see many Latino servicewomen gang-raped and Latino servicemen beheaded. I promise you this. Ideally the borders should be militarized, but realistically, the push for cultural equality will make our brave men and women much more vulnerable to abuse and terrorism by these druglords. Let's not forget, also, this is not just about drugs. This is about human trafficking, especially regarding sex. There are just as many millions being made in these markets, and they're much, MUCH more difficult to track. It's very sad, but maybe the only way is to open up America to legal immigration like Angel and Ellis Island were, every five years, with doctors on hand, and have a quota in mind to stabilize the growth and productivity of our population, and if you don't get and keep a job here, you have 6 months to leave. Anyone overstaying will be arrested, deported, and shot if they try to re-enter, their children taken away by the State. We would happily adopt any of those children, and many families who can't conceive would also. Anyone trying to scale the wall, shot. People will think twice if it's worth destroying their families because they couldn't wait five years.
Last spring I bid to roof the house of an ICE agent who gave the job to illegal aliens. He had illegal aliens working on his house for two days and probably paid them cash when they were done. I don't wonder that they have totally fallen down on guarding the border. They know they will get that retirement wheather they do their jobs or not. Why knock yourself out. After Obama told them to stop deporting people why would they try to stop anything. All you have to do is put out press relieces that say that the obvious isn't true and lable these farmers as over reacting.
C. Moakler....Those illegal Chinese roofing crews are at it again? Wow, I hope you turned them in to ICE! Or did you mean you could just tell they were illegal by the way they looked? There's nothing quite like a "probably" story to further the conversation. You want more border agents? Tell the Gop to increase taxes to pay for them. Or, make E-Verify a mandate for all employers in all states.
the prisident, congress, law enforcement, fbi, us armed forces, and federal dept. has failed to protect americans, us property, and security of our nation.
When is this " President" going to become an American and defend this country?
Your President did nothing for 8 frickin' years, you didn't complain... but after ruining the economy then slinking out the backdoor of Washingtion D.C ... all of a sudden you grow a back bone and start asking the kind of questions you should have asked before.
You ask this question when you are fully aware that money doesn't grow on trees. Even more aware that funding is Congressional responsiblity and they refuse to do anything thing which will restore the money they LET Your President waste without any restrictions.
The sooner we can get our troops out of the war "Your" President started, the sooner we can start working on this new war on Naro-terrorist.
You don't actually think that Mexican government is not getting a substaintial cut of the profits ... do you? We are caught by the short hairs dealing with the Mexican Government. in much the same way as we are in dealing with Karzi, the corrupt leader of Afganistan or Mubari, of Pakistan. We can't trust either of them - but we have to work through them. At least this President is not stupid (enough) to think we will be welcome - with Open Arms, if we invade and occupy their country.
Maybe its time to lay a mine field... Yea, I know the UN is dead set against laying mines. But, the fact is - those farms and ranches are effectively DMZ, no man lands already.
Your President, made sure of it... he sent the army to the Middle East to engage in an endless, quagmire of an uncessary war. While at home - ensured that Mexican truck had free, legal passage to the interior of the USA, without trans loading or inspection.
Ask, seriously ask the people on the border if this just started happening 3 years ago. Even in this article - the ranchers have stated this has been an ongoing problem for the last 10 - 15 years.
RE: Beoweolf ...and before someone comes along and starts crying, "Stop blaming Bush!" there may come a day, someday, dacades from now when we will really be able to stop blaming Bush. I was saying in 2005 that our country will be ruined for decades and I still stand by that. Whoever wins the next general election will have to deal with at least 4 years of being blamed for the terrible, terrible state in which Bush left this country. And that president's successor will too.
That's the way it is and it will take a actual, literal miricle for it not to take that long- an actual impossibility. And I am generally an optimist.
This has been a significant problem over the past 10 or 12 years in Southern AZ. among the owners of ranches and smaller ranchettes, ie. drastically lowered ppty. values, crime, and public institutions like schools and hospitals going broke. People elsewhere in the U.S., particularly in the extreme liberal enclaves of the Northeast can't seem to appreciate the plight that these border states are suffering and that its directly tied to unchecked illegal immigration! Maybe the problem has to hit at your doorstep to realize it!
At any rate I am a person with deep democratic roots and hispanic people in my family tree. I vote democratic most of the time, but there are certain issues where your political party can be wrong and, when it comes to the Democrat's handling of illegal immigration, this is one of them!
Did you read a different history book than the rest of us? Reagan, a Republican, is the one who granted amnesty and encouraged another generation of illegals to cross the border. Three administrations since him -- two Republicans and one Democrat -- have ignored the problem and looked the other way while hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens entered our country every year.
Now we finally have an administration that is deporting more illegals than ever, and putting more boots on the ground at the border than ever. And you complain about how this is being handled? Do you think this president or this Congress has some kind of magic power to overturn decades of neglect and outright encouragement of illegal immigration?
If we blow enough money to kill the drug smugglers, the people who buy and use drugs will suddenly stop craving them, and the drug problem will no longer exist!
It's so logical! It's not like drug violence is a result of an unregulated black market. It's not as if we haven't gone through this before (e.g. Prohibition). Nope. The solution is MORE law enforcement. It's the absolute opposite of completely useless, idiotic steps in the wrong direction.
What else could we do? LEGALIZE DRUGS? Aw, heck no! The risk intrinsic to allowing potheads the ability to purchase weed in a safe environment inevitably results in them going wild, murdering people in the streets, and sexing up our white daughters! HAVE YOU EVER SEEN REEFER MADNESS?
When has legalization of drugs prevented drug abuse. Alcohol is considered legal, is it not? What about prescription drugs? What about all the other things you can find out your home improvement store that can get you high? Why is it that stupid democrats think that the only way to solve the problem is to let them continue in their wrong doing? Do we have more money to devote to AA and all those substance abuse programs because the drugs that are legal, are slowly going away?
How about this? Any mexican who is caught smuggling drugs across the border should be shot on site. If you do enough of these, people would soon get the idea that it is better to stay in their own country with drug lords.
The risk intrinsic to allowing potheads the ability to purchase weed in a safe environment inevitably results in them going wild, murdering people in the streets, and sexing up our white daughters! HAVE YOU EVER SEEN REEFER MADNESS?
Yeah, it doesn't work for alcohol and it won't work for weed!
Didn't Chinese peasants build a wall that was three times as long as the one we need now? Didn't it protect China for the last few thousand years? They didn't even have cement trucks.
Excuse me, AA is self supporting through donations of its members. The government, at all levels, has no expenses for AA. Please try another fact. That one is totaly WRONG.
i though you were serious at first. legalization will work much better than prohibition. those that want to do drugs will do them weather they are legal or not. if there legal at least these mexican cartels wont be making money or killing anyone over it. put the money made into rehab programs. all of this will keep are jails from being so overcrowded that they have to let real criminals like lindsay lohan go free after a few hours.
reefer madness was a fictionalized story , with trained actors. it was not a documentaary. Study after study,even those supressed by the US Government agree, Pot is not a dangerous drug. it does not lead to hard drug addiction any more than drinking lemonade as a kid does. Any one addicted to heroin was going there, regardless of what they started with.
Here's a novel idea- bring our troops home, and put them on the border. With live ammo. Teach them how to say stop, and get on the ground face down, in Spanish.. Then shoot them if they don't.
Now we have created thousands of jobs for Americans, feeding , clothing, and supplying the troops here at home.
Are you all aware that the US military buys supplies from foreign manufacturers? WTF?
Just saying1043: So let me get this straight. AA is completely funded by its members? They pay for the building, electricity, etc. Absolutely no money is coming from the govt.?
seriously? How are we going to 'kill all the drug smugglers'? And how will we know when they are 'all' dead? Do you really think all the drugs that come to the US are coming through Mexico? And if we 'kill all the drug smugglers' suddenly users will stop using drugs? And bringing up Reefer Madness - really? This isn't the 1920s.
Just saying1043: So let me get this straight. AA is completely funded by its members? They pay for the building, electricity, etc. Absolutely no money is coming from the govt.?
Unhappy you would be well advised to do some research before you end up with a foot in your mouth. The Seventh Tradition would be the one you need to look closely at.
PS. good luck with that case of Athletes tongue.
The Twelve Traditions Of Alcoholics Anonymous
(in the short form)
1. Our common welfare should come first; personal recovery depends upon A.A. unity.
2. For our group purpose there is but one ultimate authority—a loving God as He may express Himself in our group conscience. Our leaders are but trusted servants; they do not govern.
3. The only requirement for A.A. membership is a desire to stop drinking.
4. Each group should be autonomous except in matters affecting other groups or A.A. as a whole.
5. Each group has but one primary purpose— to carry its message to the alcoholic who still suffers.
6. An A.A. group ought never endorse, finance, or lend the A.A. name to any related facility or outside enterprise, lest problems of money, property, and prestige divert us from our primary purpose.
7. Every A.A. group ought to be fully selfsupporting, declining outside contributions.
8. Alcoholics Anonymous should remain forever non-professional, but our service centers may employ special workers.
9. A.A., as such, ought never be organized; but we may create service boards or committees directly responsible to those they serve.
10. Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the A.A. name ought never be drawn into public controversy.
11. Our public relations policy is based on attraction rather than promotion; we need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio, and films.
12. Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all our traditions, ever reminding us to place principles before personalities.
Reefer Madness was a anti-drug movie made by the goverment douchbag, and potheads don't kill people, crackheads,methheads,heroin-addicts kill people and drunkdrivers kill people, and second of all you don't just stop craving drugs especially hard drugs that takes rehab-detox etc...have you have heard of supply and demand? People will just get their drugs from some where else not all drugs come from mexico, especially the best bud, that comes from places like Cal.,Colorado,New Mexico etc... not Mexico only lil kids smoke shwag from mexico and people that don't no anybetter lmao, its ignorant dumb redneck republicans like yourself that keep marijuana from being legalized here in the U.S.
When has legalization of drugs prevented drug abuse.
And illegalization doesn't work either. But at least if it's legal, regulated and taxed, then the people who use it will also pay for the privilege to do so, the same as with cigarettes, cigars, alcohol and prescription drugs. Are they legal? Yes. Do they get abused? Yes. But they're all taxed. And if anyone complains their cigarette tax is too high, there's not a lot of people feeling much sympathy these days. Quit smoking. In the meantime... pay up.
Legalize, regulate and tax. And who stands to benefit by making the word "tax" sound like some sort of a sign from Satan? Well you only need to ask who stands to benefit financially if drugs are kept illegal? Prison systems. Law enforcement. Border enforcement. Lawyers. Judges. Politicians. Drug manufacturers. Gun and ammo manufacturers. The list goes on and on.
As long as fear is profitable, people will create fear.
I second Rick's post. The prisons are full up as it is. Supply and demand would virtually cease to exist for the Mexican drug lords, and new legal buisnesses would spring up out of the ground. Who needs your dope when I can go pick some up from the local corner store that grows their own?
It's not open for debate anymore that "pot" is a dangerous drug that needs to be abolished. That American war on drugs or war on "sin" BS has simply got to stop. I'm fairly certain that Mcrib was being sarcastic in his statements.
As far as the article goes.... This is just an old fart that is being extremely over dramatic about things. Considering the geography he's probably one of those people that you wouldn't want your car to break down near his area and be forced to ask to use the telephone if you don't have reception. I used to live in Texas and I've met plenty of people that claim they wouldn't hesitate to shoot someone on there property without knowing the details of why they were there.
@9.6 -- "if we legalize drugs in our country our entire court system will fall apart and our police departments would be cut in half and god forbid if that should ever happen - illegal drugs are keeping our court system alive and well - all other crimes don't even come close"
Be careful, you don't want people to get confused with facts. We Americans love our courts, our police and our prisons, and most of all, we love crime. We love to watch TV shows about crime, we love knowing that our nation has more criminals than any other, and we love seeing our neighbors get locked up, because deep down, it is thrilling to know that our neighbors are bad guys who deserve to get locked up.
It would ruin our entire image of law enforcement and good guys vs. bad guys if people understood that most crimes are drug-related, and that most drug arrests are for simple possession of marijuana. We want to think of our prisons as being full of murderers, rapists and pedophiles -- not just a bunch of ordinary people who got caught with some weed.
Big Government's #1 goal is to perpetuate Big Government, and if We The People can't afford it, well we will just have to dig a little deeper and suffer a little more. We simply cannot allow people who smoke a plant to walk among us, which means we cannot allow our courts to reduce their staff or their case loads, we cannot get by with fewer prosecutors and public defenders, and we definitely cannot get by with fewer prisons and fewer police. God forbid, how would we ever catch and punish all the pot smokers?!
Didn't Chinese peasants build a wall that was three times as long as the one we need now? Didn't it protect China for the last few thousand years? They didn't even have cement trucks.
The peasants didn't build the wall, the Emperor built the wall - by using conscripted labor. As soon as they changed Emperors, the peasants started stealing the bricks to build what they needed; homes, granaries, etc.
The "Great Wall" was a waste, all to often, the locals let the invaders breech the wall if the bribe was big enough. The invaders didn't want to be farmers - they wanted the riches which the Court took from the farms and craftsmen. When you build a high royal house on the backs of peasants, they don't have all that much loyalty for the government. When you are at the bottom of a latrine, it doesn't matter all that much who's butt you see when you look up.
African proverb ... when Elephants fight, the only thing certain, is the grass will be trampled.
1. A "war zone" without a fatality - or even a casualty - so far enables the feds' denial
2. As far as the drug, not human, smuggling: without the world's largest market in the USA, there would be no cartels.
3. Meanwhile, American service(wo)men, and billions of $$, are being wasted in Afghanistan and Iraq. Put the Armed Services on the borders, engaging in extensive "war games". Any smugglers get caught, "Gee, how unfortunate."
If the Feds won't do their job, then get your local sherrif to take care of business. It's your property and your life. Handle it and vote the wimps out!
Problem is so much of it is federal land, local law enforcement can't deal with it. They attack and retreat to the federal lands and Obama hasnt given the Border Patrol full access to chase them down, even though they have petitioned his administration.
Bush had his chance to address the problem, but failed to. No President will address these problems, they want the mexicans vote. You won't find any help from you weak a$$ government.
Bush was no better at doing something to protect our border than Obama is. Neither was Clinton or Bush Sr. It's a lot easier to "tell" us things are better than to actually "make" them better. Talk is cheap, action takes a little more effort. We wouldn't want to do anything "Politically Incorrect" now would we?
Dan: Do you really think we have control over who gets to elect Mexico's next president? Sad excuse indeed for someone who really doesn't want to admit to Obama's failure of policies. It's been 3 years, when does this President finally grow up and start taking the heat for his own actions rather than what happened to his predecessors. I don't even think Bush blamed Cllinton this much.
Pray tell DTOME, what exactly do you say the government is refusing to do to enforce the border? And don't give me that same "they refuse to do it" bull@!$%#; something specific.
What a laugh some of you people are! Reagan gave the illegals amnesty and every president since then has mostly ignored this problem. During the Obama administration, deportations are up and Border Patrols are up, but suddenly it's all about a Democratic president looking for the Hispanic vote? You should hear how foolish you sound!
Securing the border had been a problem for many administrations, not Obama alone. Consider the GOP congress controls the budget of government, the complaints of the people here would be better directed to their GOP rep. We had 2 wars going on and people recommend that we send 20,000 troop to sit watch the border - Get real! Last, the Texas gun nuts always about theirs militia and gun rights; why not get these people to volunteer to patrol and guard their owned state border. They can play wth their guns and do something useful for a chance.
Illegals are the same as street gangs. But yet the only people who fear street gangs are other gang members and people who live in the "HOOD". And what do those people do. some move. some make their homes very safe. other kill trespasser. But the Government does not help any of them. I find it funny that farmers who are likely Right leaning would likely bar a woman from TANF but whats millions spent to secure THEIR LAND! that is right people! ITS their land and they want you the TAX payer to pay for it. Just like the food stamp tramp wants you to pay for her kids so she can party. These LAND owners have money, money they should spend on fences, guard dogs, and security. Just like welfare moms should not have a car with rims, cause they could use that money to not need welfare.
And if these farmers stand up and fight them, liberals would be attacking them everywhere saying they are racists and feel no compassion for brown people. Please!!!!! We know by now, how you liberals respond. You can't have it both ways. Maybe Obama can grant them amnesty after they deliver the drugs ? (sarcastic)
what i saying is, if you post no trespassing, put a REAL fence, and have dogs and security, you would be in your rights to kill people that are trespassing on you land. Also, i am pointing out that home owners across the nation are in the same boat. the police will not come to my home and camp out and keep me and my things safe. why should land owner along the border get more policing money then any other home owner in the whole nation. What next Bill Gates having the national guard keep his mansion safe. In TEXAS you can shoot some through the door! Also i should point out that people living in the HOOD are in the same danger and have been in the danger for 40 years. and the nation went on with business. Also, i don't know why if you don't pay your house payment you don't get kicked out of your home. for 40 year my mom worked as many as 5 jobs to keep her home. their have been homeless people down town for 20 years. why is this such a big deal now. OOO because it rich people that are losing money now, not just some working class drone that got behind. But now that every ones going to loss because that dude lost his house people care? What about all the homeless before them? who caries for them? no one ever cared before. but now it needed that we all keep wall street rich and not let them loss their shirts? And what i mean by all this is this, we live in a nation of mean people... and i find it silly that we don't just admit we are aLL heartless.
How ridiculous. So you think the thugs should be allowed to overrun the entire country.
Well just the poor parts right? There has been 2 people killed, 3 people shot, and who knows how much gun fire in my neighbor hood in the last year. But I don't see any more of a police presents. In fact I see less.
Dan: I am also a gun owner. Why don't you explain to me again, why you're liberal friends are so much into gun control? Perhaps you should ask them before you speak? If you don't agree with their views, perhaps its time you switched sides.
it is you conservative fools who let 1 lousy lobbyist Grover Norquist hold every republican hostage by holding their signed statements not to agree with Obama on anything, even our own country or else they will never be re-elected again - that only borders on treason and nothing else when it comes right down to running our country instead of defaulting.
You must be really naive to think that liberals don't make promises too. And poor Obama, nobody will listen to him including his own democratic constituents? But somehow you think that that makes it the fault of Republicans too, right? LOL . Let me save you the trouble. You have a spineless President. Better believe that that is the way it is, rather than thinking that its everyone's else's fault.
Have you read those "signed" statements?It doesn't matter which side you cuddle,they are sucking everybody dry and giving you lip service and bu!!sh!t for answers.Democrats in Congress don't even cry foul,because everybody there wreaks of fecal matter!Have you heard that the common direction in which this country is moving,with Congress at the wheel, is DOWN?Obama hasn't been much for management either.So,what's the solution?Dems will vote for their favorite incumbants,and repubs will vote theirs back into office.Why,because America is complacent.We don't want any commies in office,to make drastic changes,we want the commies already in office,who are owned by big business,unions,lobbiests,the rich banking system,and the likes of those who give these clowns and their family members big favors.You name them,they are crooked!
Not all people that are on Food Stamps,TANF, etc... abuse them some people depend on these government benefits to survive because they are two steps away from being homeless just wait unitl you lose your job, hope you have kids or are mentally or physically retarded because life's a b!tch without these programs and when unemployment benefits run out your srewed! More ignorant republican gargage die die rep scumbags
Government lies to protect its own interests. Bring the military home from their time and money wasting posts around the world and let them defend our country HERE! The Afghanis and Iraqis can fend for themselves among their heathen brethren.
Their is an age old way to let trespassers know that they are not welcome. Simply start putting the heads of the trespassers on a pole at the border. I would guess that a few thousand heads on poles would be a great help in discouraging people from jumping the fence and swimming the river.
Wait what am I thinking. That wouldn't be PC, and the demoncrats would say it is racist to do such a thing.
It amazes me that you refer to all Mexicans, including Mexican-Americans as "greasers", they are US Nationals and many of these so "greasers" have fought in all of the US wars overseas to protect your sorry @#$%
Left or right, democrat or republican, the problem is real, the danger is real and the approach to addressing the problem appears obvious: secure that border with a fence, spy drones and/or other available technology. . . I know that would not be a 100% fix, but it would be a drastic improvement over the present sad situation . . . that U.S. taxpayers pay hundreds of millions in foreign aid while our southern border is a porous source of drugs, illegals and violence is a deplorable state of affairs . . . let's focus on the problem and work towards a solution.
LMFAO do you think the republicans will give a sh*t, they are too busy courting them now, have been for the last 20 years. Quit dreaming. Buy a gun, before they ban that.
this won't be solved in washington. Drugs will never be legalized. It's considered political suicide, not to mention it would explode the unemployment problem. You would massively reduce the court backlog, you would dramatically reduce the need for prisons, parole officers, etc etc. Will never happen.
The fact is that there is no control at our borders and citizens who live there are not secure. Who is to blame? We have supporters for illegal aliens, we have sanctuary cities, and we have a government suing states for upholding immigration laws.
We pay our citizens not to work and illegal workers take the jobs. We have gangs controlling drug enterprises in every major city, and the government can't control this?
alur, I believe no one has ever been so exact with so few words, and for a question, you are a master of reality. It would be refreshing if more people paid attention, then the answer would be more clear.
According to The Congressional Budget Office, illegals cost the American taxpayers $338 billion dollars a year, and going up. Free school, free welfare, medical, and jobs. Repeal the law that allows any child born of an illegal in the USA to automatically be a US citizen. That takes them off of the welfare roles. If a kid gets welfare, mommy and or daddy get it too, as well as a free medical card.
The Republicans reject any thing the Democrats propose. the Democrats reject any thing the Republicans propose. Solution? Reject ALL current incumbents, and send a new batch in. In two or four years, if they aren't doing the job, send them packing.
Don't forget we have banks giving specialized loans with no ID(state) And the feds giving them awards for it DMV offering drivers licences. now that is crackdown or is that just crack
Pray tell James, what have they failed to do to enforce the border? Something specific, for a change.
Since you keep asking trolling the same thing about what the govt is not doing to secure the border here is a website to check out although I don't think anything would change a closed mind such as yours.
So in other words, your answer is "I can't answer that, Toasty."
Which is why I'll keep asking this until one of the teabaggers finally says something. Tt's been two years now since I've been asking this, though; I'm not holding my breath.
stop spending billions on war bs and build a 50 foot concrete wall the whole length of the us mexico border,keep those greasy bastards in there @!$%#hole
Stop voting democrat and you will see a big change in how the govt. handles the immigration crisis including those who deliver drugs across our border.
So thatguy1, do you think a wall on the border will keep them from going further up the coast?
Keep attacking the result and not the cause and you will always be doomed to failure.
Unhappy, if my memory serves me correctly, the current Gov. of Texas has an (R) next to him name, correct? What did I hear about his state giving in state school tuition to illegals?
Both Democrats and Republicans have dirty hands.
Besides, we have seen several Presidents, both Democrat and Republican, just sweep this issue under the rug. How about wagging your finger at all of them, OK?
Indeed. Unfortunately,bored hicks thinking they are "big" by targeting what they only THINK are those as useless as themselves from other countries persist in pretending that somebody else is stealing the job they never intended to take in the first place.
Let me hear just ONE rebuttal from a fruit picker American who couldn't find a job because of the damn Mexicans. Just one. Ever.
Maybe some of those " damn Mexicans" are really americans...But to you anybody that is not a white Anglo-Saxon is no good correct ? Everything you say has racial undertones UNHAPPY you are just an old outdated has been and your kind will be gone soon...The things you type are not just politically incorrect they will get you punched in the face in most of America including by me before I started following that old turn the other cheeck thingie...Your brother can't get a construction job because he either doesn't work as fast or for as cheap as others period...And you are always on here preaching all that free market junk so how come it's not good enough now when your bro can't get a job ? huh ? Oh it's different then, you hypocrits on the right need to get all the hate out of your heart.....
You may also wish to consider that if these smugglers are actually working with/for cartels - shooting to kill could get the farmers a much bigger problem!
But Toasty, If someone comes on to your property and threatens you or your family, I'm sure that defending yourself would not land you in prison. The situation seems more like kill or be killed.
OldGirl: That's where the vicious dogs come in. It's truly repugnant to me that American citizens have to put up with this on their own land.
Here's an interesting website I came across -- hours of video of the border being invaded for your viewing enjoyment. The folks on the border should be scared.
If Arizona secedes, I guarantee you that us patriots in Baja Arizona will remain loyal to the United States of America. You know, for the whole three and a half hours the TexNMAzAL secession lasts...
legalize drugs and you won't have a problem with traffickers crossing the farmers land. They'll be going through customs! The farmers should stop whining and start asking for REAL solutions instead of propagating fear.
So in other words, all we have to worry about is, them smuggling in illegal immigrants? Didn't you actually read the post? You legalize drugs and people are still not going to go through customs. Why risk going through customs and being turned away when you can just hop across the border for free. No import tax needed. It doesn't work for illegal immigrants and we already have a system in place to take of those people. What makes you think drugs will be any different?
He is already confused UNHAPPY. Don't make it worse. And I don't think any body read the story. This isn't about illegal immigrants. It is about the smugglers that bring them and the drugs.
I think he really means, that if you legalize the drugs, they'll be produced here, in better quality, and amount that it theoretically would kill the importation of drugs by illegal aliens(they do say that the best pot in the world is grown by the us govt). Again it would never happen.
I think that the best way to solve this problem is through force. While it would take many more reasources to brotect this large border than the DMZ in Korea we certainly have the capability. Are we not proud of having one of the most powerful militaries in the world? We have 45,000 troops coming back from Iraq, those that stayh enlisted could go towards this. Is this real danger not more important than what goes on in afgahnistan? It is true that the terroorists are for the most part based in countries like that, but before we deal with potential threats we should deal with the real threat on our border where our fellow citizens live in fear, not poverty, or unhappiness, but true fear of a foriegn power.
The one thing I cannot agree with however is the disparging comments about Obama. While is not doing the best anyone could ever do he is doing his best, something we should be atleast somewhat appreciative of. If all of you think you are better tha him run against him, the people of our country apparently want him, so he is here. This is why we are a democracy people.
Nixon's "War on Drugs" is directly responsible for this. Clinton's NAFTA is directly responsible for this. Where possibly are the mexicans getting all their guns? The U.S. of course.
Slick Willie,along with a Republican Congress,gave us permanent favored trade with China,allowing China to import cheap made goods to the U.S. at drastically reduced rates. Imports increased=job loss increased.What a deal for us!We win,again!You figure it out,and after you do,who is in charge of our economic prosperity,and the border safety?We are in DEEP doo doo people.
BS ..... 100% inaccurate and a false statement. It has started because Odumba put weapons in the hands of the runners so he would have a reason to squash our 2nd amendment right, not really a issue since he won't be around to do that but that is the reason why border violence is up.
Sorry if you don't like to hear it, but you can't change historical facts, Perk. The Assault Weapon Ban expired, and within two months you saw the first border towns getting shot up in Mexico. These initial massacres were just for fun, too. The cartel soldiers wanted to try out their news toys; guns that were just made legal by George Bush. Ever since there's been a steady increase, and it all started when the Far Right let the AWB expire.
Toasty the righties are a paranoid breed..They think a few sensible gun-control laws means next they are gonna take all the guns...Even though the ban was in effect for all those years and they never did...I actually believe in a pure definition of the second ammendment where we should be able to have whatever the government has and be able to carry anywhere,anytime but I don't get all paranoid when they do make laws..For one I am an American and I will have a gun no-matter what they say....Secondly like I said the law is sensible but I do think they should have to change the constitution to make any laws...I know that last statement was a little contradictory and that is because I don't think I am smarter than the world..
If the officials in Washington say our Borders are safe, then why were 3 drug smugglers found shot to death execution style just west of Nogales, AZ? Drugs are still streaming across the Border in and around Nogales, AZ.
What a disgrace. I am so disheartened by the fact that we as a sovereign nation are doing next to nothing to protect our land. I know the Border Patrol and other law enforcement people make the attempt, but is is impossible when the government, Obama, Holder, et al do NOTHING, In fact, Obama encourages and supports these thugs and criminals reigning over our country.
Enough, They all mistakes, How mr. prefect president reagan? Remember Iran-contra. Get over that, even mr. sleep around president clinton, Remember Wako. Lets see, and remember mr. passive president carter, the hostages. Oh and remember Mr. I am not a crook president nixon - viet nam - and in that same vein, Mr mission accomplished president bush, remember Weapons of mass destruction, or invading Iraq. See, they all have screw ups. GET OVER IT.
Iran contra was in exchange for hostages when they stormed the American Embassy. Don't you read? My problem is Obama is he's too busy sucking up to the muslims in the Middle East when he should have been dealing with this at home. Perhaps he needed to go on another vacation?
All of should stop complaining over this dam matter. Its stupid how we blame other countries for whats going on. What we call "U.S. Citizens" are the people that buy all those drugs they smuggle from other countries. Come on why would Mexicans smuggle all that drug, just for the fun of it. NO! Because Americans give them cash for those dam drugs. Stop with all this stupid presedential crap. Obama was given a country in which it was already screwed up. One other thing a lot of violence is committed in America as well. So basically we should all watch our backs from everyone, not just immigrants.
About every 30 yards apart, have head sets to communicate and a spotter. Run 4 hr shifts and set up decoys about 40 yards down range between each shooting lane. ;)
The Mexico "friends" may want our border villages or towns; and there may be another tunnel planning.
Ok, the violence on the border regions is a symptom of a problem. They are not the root cause. Until we find an intelligent way to deal with drugs in this country, the violence around drug trafficking will continue. If you really think that putting up a wall will stop the flow of drugs into this country, I have a bridge from Texas to New York you can buy, I'll sell it cheap.
I want our borders safe, but I am a realist, which we don't see much of in DC nowadays. Ask your legislator to find a new and effective way to stop the drug war. Until then, your borders will never be safe.
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
The whole reason the 'war on drugs' was started was because it was correctly recognized as being a root cause of crime, robberies, and murder to begin with. It was an honorable intention and by no means should we 'legalize' such destructive substances. However, I'd be one to admit that there needs to be a change here.
Not long ago, we were responsible for thousands of murders when we supplied guns to the drug traffickers through the program called, "Fast and Furious." A real disaster, for sure.
I think we are going the wrong way on this.
@Never Stop,
Typical left-wing, lib response.
You're confused between anti-immigrant and anti-ILLEGAL immigrant legislation.
Not surprised a lib like you doesn't know the difference.
Just stick with your left-wing talking points as usual.
Many other civilized nations have found that legalizing, regulating, and taxing drugs can result in a unprecedented decrease in illegal, illegitimate, and violent, organized crime.
Unfortunately, most American Farmers, Small Businesses, and individuals, have long sought after the cheap, unregulated, easily-bullied "illegals" to perform legion of unwanted, market-negative jobs.
Any American that hires "illegals," at Third-World prices, for First World comforts, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Hello, Romney....
Akh1, it is not "immigrants" that perform anti-capitalist, feudal, "cheap labor," but "illegals."
Shame on your willful ignorance.
Americans made the egregious error of their lives by in Barrack Hussein O'Bummer. The only way to put an end to this Immigration corruption is to have the voting Americans stand on principle--and vote this underachieving and unqualified President out of office. His primary concern is to increase relations with the Muslim people around the world, and this makes him dangerous and very much out of touch with the American priorities.
NSAQ is right. It's the desire for cheap goods and cheap labor that has driven the illegal immigration and the issues surrounding the economy in general. It's time the GOP got their heads out of their a**es and started addressing the problem and not the symptom.
Not that they would want to. The problem with both parties is they are answering based on their stock portfolios, as a recent 60 minutes segment on congressional insider trading pointed out. As long as our government is serving big business, the American people will loose.
History has proven that keeping manufacturing in America and products being sold by locally owned small business is key to maintaining a prosperous economy. What we have now is the exact opposite and economists far and wide have been pointing this fact out for years. Our system is designed to focus income toward the top, a pyramid scheme of sorts. And GOP philosophy does nothing but make the problems worse. So my message to the Tea publicans and the generally uneducated on the right is, stand up for your self, get an education in economics and stop voting for single issue items (ie. tax cuts, anit gay, anti abortion), because that is all feed for the cattle and has no substance in the real world.
When will people understand securing the border, and "comprehensive immigration reform" are two ENTIRELY different problems. That is like saying giving amnesty for burglars is the same thing as making sure houses dont get burglarized.
If your water main is broken the FIRST thing you do is turn off the water. THEN you can clean up the mess. Not the other way around.
SECURE THE BORDER!!!!!! After it is secure, then you can decide what happens with those here now.
Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
I would advise all ranchers to shoot first and ask questions later, you have the right to defend your property. Forget the gov't, the only thing they can do for you is talk. Do what you gotta do.
i say open season for all ranchers on the border
Many don't understand what the point is to a secure border.Here's what they don't get,because the media doesn't want to talk about real issues.1.If illegals can cross the borders,and drugs get in by the tons,then when will the next dirty nucleur device be smuggled into this country and detonated?. If someone brings a bomb into play,how many terrorists have already made it here?If you ignore the real issues long enough,anything could happen,and will happen.This concerns me a great deal,and what the country is doing to prevent it is even more concerning,because they act like they couldn't care less.I don't want to be in wars the rest of my life.Let's guard against intruders,and keep out the roaches.
We can seal the border. We can seal it the same way we have sealed the DMZ in Korea. We've stopped infiltration there for 60 years with the only tools that actually work. Razor wire. Minefields. Machinegun emplacements with overlapping fields of fire. Artillery firebases. 20,000 American troops.
JohnCarter-428979
Total ignorance. How many troops would it take to cover 1200 miles of border versus the 200 the DMZ occupies in Korea? Anti tax Republican philosophy would do nothing to pay for such an expensive endeavor. Get real people. Maybe we should focus on creating more opportunity for Mexicans and less for Chinese. I'm pretty sure it's harder for Chinese to swim to America than it is for Mexicans to cross a 1/10'th of a mile thick border fence.
Whether projection, ignorance, denial, or what have you... indeed, JohnCarter made a completely irrelevant,and foolish, post.
Apparently 5 people think it was relevant clinpsych. And that is quite disturbing.
I have a lot of sympathy for these people. Not only do they live in constant fear from the Mexican traffickers smuggling drugs and illegal immigrants, but from their own government that refuses to address the problem with anything more than lip service. Yes, their own government that promises to vigorously prosecute any of them for daring to defend themselves against these violent intruders.
We need to get the Tx. Army National Guard down there on the border.... that is what they are for, to protect the people of Texas. Also, that group of Volunteers needs to stop looking for a bullet in the head, go do your farm or ranch work, carry your gun, and defend yourself if need be, but stop messing around with what could be you or your families lives.
Goldy.. by your own reasoning, if they died... it was meant, by virtue of guns to advance ideology. I mean... if it is one's responsibility to defend holdings, how is it not another to seek NEW holdings?
It could be a crosser's LIFE to kill... hmmm....
I normally read these article comments and agree or disagree only to myself. However I feel my two cents are due, if only to appease my own sense of right and wrong. The general population of the United States is filled with lazy, ignorant, slobs. The "people of Wal-mart" types. If you feel offended byh these comments, load up and go to Wal-Mart and meet with your bretheren. If not, then read on. I will make simple suggestions. One, secure the border. This will be done with the simple use of OUR military, local law enforcement, and citizen volunteers. (Everyone in Texas is a member of the Texas militia) Two, Nation wide there will be an immeadiate deportation reform. This means if you are caught you will be deported, and since you have no proof of citizenship we will choose where to send you(Google operation Wetback). Three, if you are illegal and commit a crime, ie smuggling, you will not serve time, you will be transported to the border and publicly hung! No lethal injections, or rotting in a cell. People who are in this trade are pure trash and have ZERO right to life or liberty. We may have to stoop to a new low, but we have for too long gone to a gun fight with a butter knife! Four, as to our legal citizens who like to dabble in these chemical past times we will be immeadiatley siezing any and all of your possesions, you will then spend the remainder of your sentence, however long, digging the graves of the bastards who you bought the crap from. (With a spoon, by the way) If you have made it this far, welcome, you are seeing the point I am trying to pass along. We are a nation of freeloaders that for too long have been walked on in exchange for freebies and false promises. Everyone who is able, get off your tail, get a job. Put down the crack, smack, or coke. I live in Texas. I own a gun. I know my rights, but better than that I know my abilities! I know I strayed in my rant, but in these times it is difficult not to. God bless America. But before the lord comes we need to clean house!!!
Flying energy.
When you have a federal government that sues a state for trying to help. yea, I see your point. Obama and the DEMOCRATS do nothing for this problem. They encourage the entitlement mentality, which is nothing more than a rapidly ending ponzi scheme, to further their own political party instead of addressing the problem. Seal the border FIRST, worry about the illegal aliens here SECOND, not the other way around.
Wet Willy: Your righteous anger should be aimed not at the "government" but rather at the American drug users/addicts who have the excess cash to make drug smuggling so profitable. You and the other lazy conservatives are always looking for the easy way out. You complain about "big government" getting in your way, and then expect them to be "big government" when you have troubles. Well this one's simple, Wet Willy: it's the LAW OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND. Until the people of wealth give up their drug habits/addictions, there will be a war to be the supplier for that addiction. I say send the drug USERS down to defend the border! They can cut out the middle men and make the border areas safer for the rest of us.
GBH-4603409 is evidently a bigoted ignorant R. Sole.
I have a simple question. Who do you believe? The government or the ranchers. I believe the ranchers. They are out there where they witness this first hand and on a daily basis, not sitting behind a desk in some office , in some large city, looking at figures then spouting off that our ranchers are safe. I don't have all the answers, but I do know this. What the government is doing now is not the answer...
Calm down! Look at the excellent job our government has done preventing anyone from carrying a full size tube of toothpaste onto an airliner. One thing at a time!
How about Statehood for Mexico? Since polls taken of Mexican citizens indicate over 50% would move north if given the chance, why not move the US to them?then unleash the DEA and the DOJ on the cartels.It's not like we haven't done it before. My ancestor Gen. Winfield Scott did it in 1848. The only reason we didn't annex Mexico outright was that they all would have been slave states. That issue is settled.If we ARE to have union with Mexico, wouldn't it be better accomplished under the US Constitution and the Constitutional mechanism of Statehood than through some nebulous process of Norh American Union?
I've traveled the world over and I've never seen so many people trying to get me addicted to drugs than here in the US. I've had people trying to get me hooked on heroin, cocaine, crack, LSD, weed, meth, speed, you name it.
One way or another I'll end up meeting a friend of a freind who'll sooner than later will try to sell me some freaking oxycodon or xanax or whatever.
I don't mean to make the US look bad but, I swear, I can't think of anyone in any other country I've been to who's ever try to get me hooked on anything but wine, beer or tobacco.
Americans need to seriously get a grip on themselves and find pleasure in the simple things of life like food, and drinks, and each other's company instead of isolating themselves so they can consume the most amount of drugs just so they don't have to deal with the outside world or, God forbid, their own families.
How can any American pretend to care about drug smuggling across their borders while their government carries on a "War On Drugs" whose only purpose is to jail and deprive people of educational and economic opportunities because of their addictions?
I think it is the height of hypocrisy to blame Mexicans, or Colombians, or whomever else, because of a mafia that exists due to the monstrous appetite for drugs Americans have.
Americans need to stop feeling sorry for themselves, get real, and deal with their own problems in a humane and practical way.
Is that too much to ask?
FlyingEnergy, do the math. If it takes 20,000 troops to seal a 200 mile border then it will take 6 times that many to seal a 1200 mile border. Oh, look, we have that many being withdrawn from Iraq and Afghanistan. If we aren't to dump them on the domestic unemployment line, we're going to have to find something for them to do. Defending our borders is the primary duty of our armed forces, so lets let them do that.
Poor decrepit violent Mexico would find something to smuggle and make money at Americas expense regardless if we legalized Marijuana..Our troops should be protecting our borders" it has escalated out of control, anybody from any country could come here through back door Mexico this is crazy ignorance.!
Com-on folks.....
Does anyone think that the Department of Homeland Security WOULD LIE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ?
Or that the President of the United States would tell the AMERICAN PEOPLE that the borders are secure enough to allow for HIS AMNESTY PROGRAM ?
If anyone believes these two, then I own the Brooklyn Bridge and will sell it to you cheap.
It is time for the Liberals to consider selecting ANOTHER CANDIDATE to run for President in the next election. Mr. Obama has run the course for on-the-job training and he has failed Domestically and Internationally.
thenew, before the Israelis put up their Berlin Wall they had to withdraw their troops and tanks so they wouldn't get stuck in case of an attack. It's the lack of Israeli troops and military hardware that has led to less Palestinian attacks on the Israelis.
That's something you'll see throughout history and the world over: Get the occupying soldiers out of the way and people will stop attacking them. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.
I like that idea, build the wall as there is loads of sand there for concrete walls. Don't send them back until they get the wall done, then perhaps they could be dropped over the wall. They would be happy to be home.
I wonder if POTUS and CONGRESS are being paid $$$ by the drug cartel to do nothing?
We are giving it all away....
45,000 people have been killed since President Calderon has been at his "job".
Now, how can Obama let this outrageous leader of Mexico tell America what it can and cannot do. Why doesn't President Obama speak out against this fake leader--all of them are playing both sides.
Meanwhile, Innocent Americans living on the borders are being slaughtered. Yes, slaughtered, just like in Egypt. The top drug cartel Zeta is getting away with murder--put in some Laws---protect our Security Border Officers--Holder did not care about the American Security Border Officer killed weeks ago--he did not acknowlege the event, nor did he call on the man's family to give them his condolences. Holder has to GO, GO, GO!
When will America show that it cares about it's citizens and their lives.
I've never seen anything like what is happening in the US today in my long lifetime. Never.
Speak Out--do something, Mr. President. Forget the wining and dining of other enemy leaders in the WH at State dinners. This job is not a Fraternity party--
Everywhere there is suffering here. No one listens. No Hope, No Change.
Wait, 2012 is coming--we must have Change.
Guns: Fast and Furious: Holder!---The President should be fast and furious getting Holder out; what a scam!
I grew up in South Texas. Back in the 70's they crossed hungry, looking for work. Marijuana was being smuggled, kilos, not tons like it is now, along with coke, heroin, & guns. Today the ppl live in fear. They will shoot you in a heartbeat. Islamic terrorist groups are setting up shop in Mexico and forming alarming ties with the country's brutal drug cartels....Hezbollah has been doing this for over 10 years. They are well funded. We need to wake up and take control of our border before they launch a scud missile...A single electromagnetic pulse, or EMP, attack will cause the collapse of the electric power grid, all the critical infrastructures and other electronic systems across the continental United States and basically cause a permanent blackout.
Fighting hard on the WAR ON DRUGS, ALL these years.
LOWERING the corporate tax rate far below Canada's. Our corporate tax rate is HALF of Israel's (as a percentage of GDP)
LOWEST personal tax rate since the 1950s.
So, WHY isn't any of this working?
Maybe, just maybe......The state of the economy doesn't have diddly-doo to do with high taxes, or low taxes.
So then dems and repubs are just spewing lies and crap.
You can be sure that Republicans and Democrats will never secure the border. They both had the opportunity controlling all the houses within the past 8 years. They didn't do squat.
Enough with the lies.
The next time you are asked for your political affiliation....MARK INDEPENDENT!
Gaza is under a ruthless siege and it's forced to import food and every day items through the tunnels. As such they've a right to defend themselves.
When it comes down to who can you trust... you still need to add the GOPpers to the "Naughty" list. If they are not lying, then they are exaggerating or trying to disguise in-action with the claim of "studying the situation".
Well Jeb, its the same situation which you guys ignored - to allow cheap labor to get a foot-hold in the country... just how long do you good Ol' boys and "Fat Cats" need study the situation... and allow the border to remain as porous as the bullets holes in the heads of innocent, non-drug using Americans; small farmers, fearful ranchers, out of work construction, manufacturing, truck driving regular folks?
The head line:
What was really said:
I'm inclined to believe the obama administration since they would never have cause to lie to the American public. They have no agenda to push. Besides, who would know better what is happening in south Texas, the local law enforcement and farmers or the politicians on capital hill?
*gathers a bunch of facts, researches a bunch of statistics, data and peer-reviewed evidence*
*realizes he'd be casting pearls before swine*
*Deletes post, and goes for a bike-ride*
Bye! :D
David 1.22
My righteous anger is aimed at exactly where it should be aimed, which is the "government". The solution is not big government but legalization of marijuana at least. By now, only people that live in caves are the ones that believe this so-called war on drugs has any effect at all save for filling prisons and enriching drug cartels, not to mention maintaining a large government bureaucracy.
There should be a "Castle Doctrine" where people have immunity from prosecution for defending themselves from these intruders, so long as it's done on their land, and is something a number of states have already adopted.
Actually, from your post you seem more like the conservative you accuse me of being.
If for all these years, Republican and Democrat Congresses have been saying stop illegal immigration,
Why do we still have illegal immigration?
wet willy,
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
How are we better off?
SEAL THE BORDER, thats the only smart answer.
wet willy,
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
How are we better off?
SEAL THE BORDER, thats the only smart answer.
wet willy,
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
How are we better off?
SEAL THE BORDER, thats the only smart answer.
wet willy,
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
How are we better off?
SEAL THE BORDER, thats the only smart answer.
wet willy,
Legalizing pot will do NOTHING. Anytime the government gets involved, they have to get their cut. What is going to happen is people are gonna by once from "uncle Barrys pot is us world" and get the high priced stamp,(with the governments cut) then go back to the street vender with the cheap pot, put in Uncle Barrys bag and if questioned, they got it from the LEGALIZED pot source. Then, more people try pot because its legal, some like it enough to keep smoking it, they figure out that it is cheaper from the street, than from the store. Demand increases for illegal pot.
How are we better off?
SEAL THE BORDER, thats the only smart answer.
The real question folks need to be asking themselves..is just where do our so called elected politicans stand on this issue ? If anyone has been paying attention..you will notice that all latino's are being bowed down too for votes...which allows illegals all the time they need . Placing blame on Obama would be silly since every politican in congress wants the vote of the friends of illegals....including of course now Obama..but this has been going on longewr than Obama has been president..if complaints are to be made they have to be directed at our elected in congress, who do noting but protect their votes...protecting this country means little to nothing and protecting its people mean even less. Protecting our borders should be of great concern for politicans ..it is not.
When is this " President" going to become an American and defend this country?
This "President" huh? Considering almost every darn thing he has to do has to be ok'd by the congress and senate, Why aren't you asking, When is All our elected officials going to become Americans and defend this country. And you can keep asking, because out even if the Democratic President said he wanted a fence built now, you can bet that the Republicans will come up with a reason not to. There is no doubt in my mind. And if you think that isn't true, you haven't watched the news.
This President is too busy warning the Egyptian military to pay attention to what is happening on our Southern Border!!
Who the hell is in charge?
This president is essentially useless when it comes to fulfilling the oath of office which he took. In that oath he swore to uphold and PROTECT the territorial soverignity of the United States. Rather than doing so, he panders for hispanic votes. I have news for him, there are many hispanic ranchers and farmers whose lives are in danger as a result of his inaction. They vote. As to getting congress involved, they're too busy making money from insider trading and other boondoggles to pay any attention to concerns amongst the citizens.
The areas are huge and when a law enforcement officer tells a rancher to arm himself and wear a bulletproof vest....well, that is beyond pathetic.
They aren't until there are enough american farmer's deaths...by then it will be too late...
Why not label them terrorists? The govt is busy sticking its nose in every other countries business, but can't handle its own problems.
Probably about the same length of time as all of his predecessors. Did you ask them the same question? What was their answer? This one's probably the same as the last one's.
Never, he is a useless butt hole
Still blaming Bush............ How sad.........
The Republicans hate those nasty government interventions and regulations.......The Texan Republicans and TeaBaggers should be REAL HAPPY now....
Obama is not deporting them in 'record numbers' contrary to what the spin is. Most are left alone, hell, he told the DOJ to ignore those without a criminal record. Then you have the deported who return to commit crime after crime after crime and what's done about it? Nada. As to Bush, the situation on the border these days is far worse than during Bush's term. Also, Obama is the president and has been for over three years now. Blaming Bush for Obama's current ineptitude and disregard for protecting the citizens he was elected to serve, well, good luck but the excuses are beyond lame and border on the pathetic.
I don't - I blame the knee jerk idiot American public who has been sold a bill of goods propaganda against drugs for the last 50 years which has made any effort to deal with it realistically almost impossible. You want to stop the drug war and border violence? Then decriminalize and legalize drugs and get rid of the DEA bureaucracy which is the root cause of all the violence and gigantic costs.
You can't expect your government to be any smarter than the jerks who have been electing them. You want to blame somebody...here's a mirror. Enjoy.
Dan has a valid point, more illegals have been deported during this administration than during any other in recent memory. Does that mean the border is "safer than ever"? No. But does it mean the federal government is doing a lot more about solving this problem than it used to? Yes. But that is apparently still not nearly enough.
It probably doesn't help matters when the governor of Texas -- the state that shares the longest border with Mexico -- does something like grant in-state college tuition to illegal immigrants. Good job Rick Perry. You are just the conservative darling, aren't you?
"The Obama administration and many local officials have said the U.S.-Mexican border is safer than ever and that reports of violence on the American side are wildly exaggerated."
Yup - spoken well by a politicil lap dog 3000 miles away. I wonder if this "administration official" has ever stepped FOOT in Texas.
Lucy,
President Obama has no interest in upholding Constitutional law regarding illegal alien traffic in the U.S. Why? Because President Obama's popularity numbers are way down and he doesn't want to lose the Hispanic Community vote in 2012. So, who pays the price? Every American dealing with job loss, border crime, illegal gang, drug and weapons traffic in America.
Why should any of this surprise any of you... After all, President Obama initiated a lawsuit against the State of Arizona for taking illegal alien related traffic and crimes in their own hands. What do you expect, when you have a President who is more interested in "Face Time on Letterman" than honoring the "Oath of Office to Uphold the Constitution."
FYI, there are signs up along the southern Arizona borders warning Americans "drive through this area at your own risk." This is do to the heavy occupation of illegal aliens and related border crime issues.
And Democrats wonder why the rest of America is fed up with Obama! 2012 can't get here fast enough for me......
"Despite government assurances that they're safe, they say the level of violence in rising"
Well, any time you have this current administration telling you one thing, always, and I do mean ALWAYS, run in the opposite direction. Let's give it up for Big Sis Janet warning us about frying turkeys! Woohoo! Anyone need a government-issued band-aid for those oil pops that burned your skin?
You Obamabots love living in your own lies, don't you?
http://standwitharizona.com/blog/2011/08/18/obama-amnesty-begins-halts-deportations-for-300000-illegal-aliens-offers-work-permits/
He gave a whirlwind campaign fundraiser tour in Austin (a flaming liberal lone star city in Texas) back in May.
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
Well first of all, if the US didn't have a drug problem they wouldn't have a market What is fascinating to me is that the ONLY young adults and grownups that I know that often use drugs are liberals. Of course most young adults today are liberals because they want somebody to take care of them and so they look to government to be all things for them. The older folks still taking drugs are the baby boomer hippies many camouflaged in suits today. I will however admit this. Many boomers and many of the young adults today have an alcoholic problem as well. Neither vice is good, but even when Hillary Clinton pointed out that if there wasn't a market for drugs they wouldn't be smuggling the drugs in to this country and still the public ignored here as well. We are just plain STUPID.
I am extremely sad for those living on the borders because our government is basically calling them liars. Obama and democrats support open borders and do not want to clamp down on anything that could be construed as anti-Mexican. They want and need the future votes. It is that simple and that is why they are making this a political issue instead of a national security issue. It boggles the mind that if our borders are so porous why can't terrorists transport dangerous weapons etc, into this country.
We have spent billions in the name of democracy in the ME with really zero success. Imagine how much border enforcement could have been done with that money?
I own a good bit of land and consider every inch MINE. To know that smugglers were using that land to pollute my country and put humans in physical harm makes me sick. Walk in their shoes for a moment, and imagine how it would feel to have people move in and out of your house or across your lawn when they felt like it and threaten you on top of that.
Our government regarding this matter and so many others is a complete failure.
Bring the troops home and put them where they're needed, on the border. Forget about borders of other countries. Secure ours first.
theboys,
That's funny theboy's, my experience is the exact opposite, so is the Congressional budget offices experience. 3 to 1, that is the amount of money spent on welfare in red states compared to blue states. I personally know more Republican's children use drugs than democrat's unless you count marijuana as a drug, then it's probably equal. And more people are arrested on drug charges in red states than blue states. These are cold hard facts that can't be denied, so your gonna have to clarify your apparent, "feelings", about the issues.
This should NOT be happening in the United States. A landowner should feel safe; BE safe on his own land!
It is outrageous that the Obama Administration refuses to defend our border against that 3rd world country, Mexico!
Obama is a shamfeul president.
Willing.Sniper,
How is this Obama's fault. What did GW do that Obama isn't to stop the problem? What did Reagan do? I'm sorry but I think this is an economics problem not a presidential problem. You would know that if you knew how the government worked. Checks and balances, it's as much a Republican problem as it is Obamas, so cut the crap.
OBAMA has an UNCLE and an AUNT ZATUNI here in the USSR of Massachusetts that are here illegally, do you think he cares about us Americans ???? His auntie Zatuni is living in public housing and has been ordered to be deported twice before she was granted the big OK by her nephew!!!!
She sounds Awful.
People are granted citizenship by the hundreds of thousands every year in America. I'm sure a good citizen that has contributed all she could while she was able, and continues to contribute even with a disability would be a great choice for permanent citizenship.
Why would would you think any different? This argument seems more about Obama than actual policy.
Lucy et al: when will the drug users/addicts give up their habits so the drug smuggling will stop. You conservatives - if you only had even half a brain, you would understand that this is a war brought about by the LAW OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND. If the Americans who have the excess cash to pay for their drug addiction/habit STOPPED, there would be no DEMAND and no cash, and SUPPLY would vanish. No more border wars. Lucy and you other simpletons: address the ROOT CAUSE, not the RESULT. Don't blame the President or "the government." Blame your family, friends and neighbors whose drug habits fuel these border wars.
And pay tell, what exactly do you guys say the government is "refusing" to do to defend the border?
For ALL you people that blame Bush or President Obama, just let me say they ALL are working for the New World Order to destroy America.
Open borders, every language other than English being spoken, no domestic energy developmment of any account, continued deIndustrialization of our manufactorin base, and the bankruptcy of our nation is ALL intentional by the Trans National Global ELITE BANKSTERS destroying the American Middleclass so they can impliment their New World Order.
Bush I, II, CLinton and Presidnet Obama are ALL Agency developed. Different puppets, same puppst masters!
David in WI, Why did President Obama unleash the Justice Department and the DEA to bust LEGAL medical marajana growers in Cali when Bush left them alone? Could the 500 Thousand he just get bundled by the Pharma companies worrriwed over decreasing Zanax sales or could it be the illegal Mexican drugs trade being hurt?
"
Could da President be a right wing conservative? LOL!
@3.17 -- Ronzwyf, those signs in southern AZ have been there since long before Obama took office...because the drug traffickers have been there that long too. The areas where those signs are posted are very remote and mostly uninhabited -- a desert national monument and an Indian reservation. The only way you would ever see one of those signs is on a hike or off-road excursion. There is a reason the drug smugglers and human smugglers prefer that region -- precisely because it is so empty of settlements and so difficult to patrol. We're not talking about someone's ranch, we're talking about a huge land area that is so hostile and desolate, it is a smuggler's dream.
Regarding Arizona"s immigration law, it was no surprise that the Feds sued the state on the grounds that only the federal government can make immigration law, not the states. The author of that law, Russel Pearce, was so unpopular in his home district that he recently became the first AZ legislator in history to be recalled from office in a special recall election. He was replaced by another Republican who believes that we have more than just one issue to be concerned about...like maybe the economy and jobs and a business-friendly tax environment. Pearce was single-minded in his pursuit of illegal immigrants and challenging the Feds at all costs, and the voters in his district decided that was not really what they had in mind when they elected him.
Mexico complains about guns coming from the US but let me tell you about how mexico controls their borders. I took a trip to Nougalas 2 years ago and when I crossed the border into mexico I saw people carrying suitcases and duffle bags through the gate and there were no mexican border officers on duty. How many fire arms went through that gate. But it took me 2 hours to get back into the USA
Hey Joe, you think the rest of us don't watch the news? Newsflash for you...our current president is pleased with the border situation. He thinks the border is fine the way it is and he fights the states that say otherwise. I really hope he has trouble sleeping at night knowing that there are US citizens afraid to walk their own property because he will do nothing to try and change the border situation! Shame on you Mr. president for not standing up for the citizens of the United States.
Shame on you Fab Five for being ignorant of your own history. This problem has been decades in the making -- a problem exacerbated by Republican administrations who gave amnesty and otherwise looked the other way because "cheap labor is good for business" -- and now that we finally have an administration that is deporting more illegals than ever before, and has increased boots on the ground at the border, all you can say is "shame on you Mr. president"? You really should educate yourself before posting misinformed opinions.
Ignoring all the fools who want to somehow make this a political issue, I'll say this: the war on drugs has caused this mess in the first place, and we are the country that gave these criminals their guns. So, having admitted that we screwed up, where do we go from here? I have a few suggestions.
1) Legalize the drugs and set up a government agency to produce them. Not Big PHARMA, more on that in a second. I don't say legalize them because I use them, because I don't, and in most cases, due to my own weird brain chemistry, can't. I know it will cause a spike in addiction in the U.S., at least temporarily. That's the price we have to pay.
2) Make it illegal to grow or produce any drugs outside what the government controls, in every state. That may seem redundant, and a part of the war on drugs, but it's not really. The reason will follow.
3) Most people don't know this, but the sole contribution that Reagan had on the fall of the Soviet Union was the arms race. We out-spent Russia, and that went a long way to destabilizing the government there. This will be the reverse. The government makes the drugs available everywhere, always underselling any street value. This is a price-war, so independent growers/producers would destabilize the effort.
4) Station troops returning from Afghanistan in hot zones as a precaution.
5) Finally, buy any crops we can get our hands on directly from the farmers. This is just to let more air out of the balloon, and won't work in most cases. It's been suggested for years that we just pay the farmers for their crops. In theory, that sounds good, but the profit for the farmers is short lived if the cartel shoots them the next day for selling their product. Most people leave that out of the logic.
In the end, we put the cartels out of business by cutting the price of product so that everyone gets what they want from the government. In the meantime, we beef up the security along the boarder. I have no problem with migrant workers, but I also have no problem with shooting at drug dealers on sight. In the end, we increase and heavily tax the drugs we sell, having created a safer boarder and put the cartels in the poor house. Add to it rehab programs and informational commercials, and, in a generation, we bring use down, while keeping the product safe, and putting all the money into the government.
Everyone wants to blame the Mexicans for this problem. It's foolish. WE are the consumers. WE gave them the guns. WE made it into big business with the war on drugs. It's OUR fault, and WE need to fix it.
The painful irony is that we blame the cartels for making life bad, but excuse our own corporations for essentially the same behavior, and in both cases, the people want to spend less to have a smaller government, but they want that same underfunded government to fix the problems. I never thought I'd see the day when Americans were so bad at adding and subtracting.
You may now go back to pointing fingers at each other while the boarder states burn.
I like your ideas, but unfortunately the drug war is a political issue, and the government has much to be gained by perpetuating it...even if that means allowing the Mexican cartels to thrive...not to mention the Afghan opium lords, whose fields have been protected by our our own brave military men and women.
But for what it's worth, the border states aren't exactly burning. It's business as usual, except for these occasional media stories about some rancher who feels unsafe...just like he has felt for the last 10 or 15 years. Not exactly newsworthy...just a reminder of a long-standing problem.
THIS President is doing the same thing to secure our border that our LAST President did.
Buttki$$.
Quit pointing fingers at the 'other' party and WAKE UP
If our government can post 26,500 armed US troops in South Korea to protect their border and country, why can't our government post 26,500 US troops on our border to protect our country?
If for all these years, Republican and Democrat Congresses have been saying stop illegal immigration,
Why do we still have illegal immigration?
Well, lets see here, War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Terror and I'm probably neglecting a few other 'wars' which have solved what, exactly? Well, they have created jobs for many, many bureaucrats so guess there's a positive side...right?
This is absolutely disgusting. America Citizens living in real danger and fear because our complacent Government wants to destroy the Country give it away to Mexico? Where is Obama and Janet? Why aren't they down there walking the land with these men and women? Border " safer than ever" my eye. Shame on America for this!!!! Shame on all the Illegal lovers for this! Sham on the legal Mexican Citizens and Laraza for not speaking up against this violence against America Citizens.
When you say "Give it away to Mexico", are you talking about the land we stole from Mexico in the first place? THAT land?
Obtaining land from war isnt exactly stealing is it?
You mean the land Mexico stole from Spain? and Spain from the Indians, and the Indians from the Mammoth, and on and on.
Did you really just capitalize Mammoth? Like they are a 'people'?
Someone on this thread needs to read some history. I would suggest starting with Moses Austin and his son, Stephen F. Austin and Santa Anna. After that, work your way back. Americans didn't steal anything from Mexico.
@not so otto....
"When you say "Give it away to Mexico", are you talking about the land we stole from Mexico in the first place? THAT land?"
Forgiving Mexico war debt and paying $18,000,000 to Mexico for "that Land" isn't exacally stealing...need to read Mexican and American history.
no its a ski resort in caliornia
Before we accuse our nation for stealing land...explain to me how Mexicans came to speak spanish....
@blamo-3823159
how is it that we "stole " the land when after the texans defeated santa anna he signed over the land in exchange for his own life i think you should look up the definition of the word first
@Not so otto,
You mean the "land" Mexico stole from Spain??
How ironic you fail to mention that......I guess it doesn't suit your pro-Mexico agenda, eh??
Nana, you're naive if you don't think that Janet and Obama aren't aware of what's happening and aren't concerned. But this is a Mexico issue first, and an American concern second. The only recourse we have is to use the drones to kill the smugglers. I can guarantee you that that's on the drawing board. Because in a way not only are they violating sovereign land, they are acting like terrorists - threatening American citizens.
Read the Terrorist and Patriot Acts....the drones are coming.
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
Haven't you anything else to offer?
And what exactly is it that you think the government isn't doing to defend the border?
you alredy said that toasty
Ya really need to shut up! this is our land! its our ancestors land! we own this land! ya are from across the world. just because a couple of hundred years ain't going to give you the right of calling it yours when its been ours for thousands of years. Just shut the hell up!
WTF are you talking about?
Nana, you are totally right. Let's raise taxes on the rich, so we can afford to properly defend our boarders. It's disgusting that we won't even pony up to defend ourselves.
BTW, do you see the racism in your own statement? Legal aliens speaking out against violence against American citizens? News flash: Legal aliens is an oxymoron. They are called American citizens, and it sounds like Americans are speaking out about the violence against us all plainly enough.
this will continue, the demand is always there and the farmers are scared to death, which i don't blame them. so what are they to do? the only way this will ever end is for the military to get involved. this will continue until something happens and the politicians get on obama to do something. but for now just wave at the smugglers and say hello. its that or get shot.
Our military has been involved with fighting the drug war for decades, don't kid yourself. The only way this ends somewhat peacefully and within our lifetimes is when prohibition is declared a failure -- again! If you think that sounds nuts, listen to what the good folks from Law Enforcement Against Prohibition have to say and consider that our current laws 1.) do not work; and, 2.) empower criminal organizations and terrorist networks everywhere while undermining the legitimacy of our government and the rule of law in general.
It's high time our politicians embrace the truth, or stop pretending to be public servants. The military industrial complex must be confronted for the vicious beast it has become, or violence like this is only the beginning..
They cross my land every night. And now the border patrol has pulled out. obama wants the illegals left alone.
Obama wants the illegals left alone...
Future democrat voters, he won't rest until someone is killed...Oh wait, several people have been killed, Americans have been killed. Guess getting Quadaffi and making the world a safer place for the oil companies is more important.
the politicians will never do anything but lie and deceive to get their way into office and then proceed to trick the trusting voters that they are doing anything but filling their pockets it is up to the citizens to right this wrong, our "leaders " have not/will not do anything until we initiate the change.....rise up america we cannot afford to be lazy any longer
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
Well, since we're bringing about 100,000 troops home, this is a good job for them going forward.
I don't know; much of the military - particularly the U.S. Marines in which my husband currently serves - are visibly Latino. Like Islamic terrorists, Latino drug cartels are the biggest murderers of their own people. Since my husband's been a recruiter, we often hear of boys going back home to LA or further south, being identified by their physical features, and killed because they're suspected of belonging to a rival gang. Many have left gangs to join the Corps. Militarizing out borders with Latinos is a very bad idea and will see many Latino servicewomen gang-raped and Latino servicemen beheaded. I promise you this. Ideally the borders should be militarized, but realistically, the push for cultural equality will make our brave men and women much more vulnerable to abuse and terrorism by these druglords. Let's not forget, also, this is not just about drugs. This is about human trafficking, especially regarding sex. There are just as many millions being made in these markets, and they're much, MUCH more difficult to track. It's very sad, but maybe the only way is to open up America to legal immigration like Angel and Ellis Island were, every five years, with doctors on hand, and have a quota in mind to stabilize the growth and productivity of our population, and if you don't get and keep a job here, you have 6 months to leave. Anyone overstaying will be arrested, deported, and shot if they try to re-enter, their children taken away by the State. We would happily adopt any of those children, and many families who can't conceive would also. Anyone trying to scale the wall, shot. People will think twice if it's worth destroying their families because they couldn't wait five years.
A few year ago my wife wanted me to take her to Mexico. So I took her to East LA.
Last spring I bid to roof the house of an ICE agent who gave the job to illegal aliens. He had illegal aliens working on his house for two days and probably paid them cash when they were done. I don't wonder that they have totally fallen down on guarding the border. They know they will get that retirement wheather they do their jobs or not. Why knock yourself out. After Obama told them to stop deporting people why would they try to stop anything. All you have to do is put out press relieces that say that the obvious isn't true and lable these farmers as over reacting.
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
as long as there are people on the planet combined with alcohol there will always be a drug problem
C. Moakler....Those illegal Chinese roofing crews are at it again? Wow, I hope you turned them in to ICE! Or did you mean you could just tell they were illegal by the way they looked? There's nothing quite like a "probably" story to further the conversation. You want more border agents? Tell the Gop to increase taxes to pay for them. Or, make E-Verify a mandate for all employers in all states.
the prisident, congress, law enforcement, fbi, us armed forces, and federal dept. has failed to protect americans, us property, and security of our nation.
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
Pray tell James, what have they failed to do to enforce the border? Something specific, for a change.
Your President did nothing for 8 frickin' years, you didn't complain... but after ruining the economy then slinking out the backdoor of Washingtion D.C ... all of a sudden you grow a back bone and start asking the kind of questions you should have asked before.
You ask this question when you are fully aware that money doesn't grow on trees. Even more aware that funding is Congressional responsiblity and they refuse to do anything thing which will restore the money they LET Your President waste without any restrictions.
The sooner we can get our troops out of the war "Your" President started, the sooner we can start working on this new war on Naro-terrorist.
You don't actually think that Mexican government is not getting a substaintial cut of the profits ... do you? We are caught by the short hairs dealing with the Mexican Government. in much the same way as we are in dealing with Karzi, the corrupt leader of Afganistan or Mubari, of Pakistan. We can't trust either of them - but we have to work through them. At least this President is not stupid (enough) to think we will be welcome - with Open Arms, if we invade and occupy their country.
Maybe its time to lay a mine field... Yea, I know the UN is dead set against laying mines. But, the fact is - those farms and ranches are effectively DMZ, no man lands already.
Your President, made sure of it... he sent the army to the Middle East to engage in an endless, quagmire of an uncessary war. While at home - ensured that Mexican truck had free, legal passage to the interior of the USA, without trans loading or inspection.
Ask, seriously ask the people on the border if this just started happening 3 years ago. Even in this article - the ranchers have stated this has been an ongoing problem for the last 10 - 15 years.
RE: Beoweolf ...and before someone comes along and starts crying, "Stop blaming Bush!" there may come a day, someday, dacades from now when we will really be able to stop blaming Bush. I was saying in 2005 that our country will be ruined for decades and I still stand by that. Whoever wins the next general election will have to deal with at least 4 years of being blamed for the terrible, terrible state in which Bush left this country. And that president's successor will too.
That's the way it is and it will take a actual, literal miricle for it not to take that long- an actual impossibility. And I am generally an optimist.
This has been a significant problem over the past 10 or 12 years in Southern AZ. among the owners of ranches and smaller ranchettes, ie. drastically lowered ppty. values, crime, and public institutions like schools and hospitals going broke. People elsewhere in the U.S., particularly in the extreme liberal enclaves of the Northeast can't seem to appreciate the plight that these border states are suffering and that its directly tied to unchecked illegal immigration! Maybe the problem has to hit at your doorstep to realize it!
At any rate I am a person with deep democratic roots and hispanic people in my family tree. I vote democratic most of the time, but there are certain issues where your political party can be wrong and, when it comes to the Democrat's handling of illegal immigration, this is one of them!
Did you read a different history book than the rest of us? Reagan, a Republican, is the one who granted amnesty and encouraged another generation of illegals to cross the border. Three administrations since him -- two Republicans and one Democrat -- have ignored the problem and looked the other way while hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens entered our country every year.
Now we finally have an administration that is deporting more illegals than ever, and putting more boots on the ground at the border than ever. And you complain about how this is being handled? Do you think this president or this Congress has some kind of magic power to overturn decades of neglect and outright encouragement of illegal immigration?
If we blow enough money to kill the drug smugglers, the people who buy and use drugs will suddenly stop craving them, and the drug problem will no longer exist!
It's so logical! It's not like drug violence is a result of an unregulated black market. It's not as if we haven't gone through this before (e.g. Prohibition). Nope. The solution is MORE law enforcement. It's the absolute opposite of completely useless, idiotic steps in the wrong direction.
What else could we do? LEGALIZE DRUGS? Aw, heck no! The risk intrinsic to allowing potheads the ability to purchase weed in a safe environment inevitably results in them going wild, murdering people in the streets, and sexing up our white daughters! HAVE YOU EVER SEEN REEFER MADNESS?
mcrib - please don't confuse the issue with facts. Most people aren't interested in them.
mcrib-4576298 did you just use a "the whitest kids you know" line?
When has legalization of drugs prevented drug abuse. Alcohol is considered legal, is it not? What about prescription drugs? What about all the other things you can find out your home improvement store that can get you high? Why is it that stupid democrats think that the only way to solve the problem is to let them continue in their wrong doing? Do we have more money to devote to AA and all those substance abuse programs because the drugs that are legal, are slowly going away?
How about this? Any mexican who is caught smuggling drugs across the border should be shot on site. If you do enough of these, people would soon get the idea that it is better to stay in their own country with drug lords.
Yeah, it doesn't work for alcohol and it won't work for weed!
The web really does need a sarcasm font.
Didn't Chinese peasants build a wall that was three times as long as the one we need now? Didn't it protect China for the last few thousand years? They didn't even have cement trucks.
Unhappy, you speak the truth.
"money devoted to AA"
Excuse me, AA is self supporting through donations of its members. The government, at all levels, has no expenses for AA. Please try another fact. That one is totaly WRONG.
i though you were serious at first. legalization will work much better than prohibition. those that want to do drugs will do them weather they are legal or not. if there legal at least these mexican cartels wont be making money or killing anyone over it. put the money made into rehab programs. all of this will keep are jails from being so overcrowded that they have to let real criminals like lindsay lohan go free after a few hours.
You obviously don't know anything about drugs or users.
Nope, we need to poison all the drugs we confiscate for a year and out em back on the street, pass out free body bags and open a mass grave.
reefer madness was a fictionalized story , with trained actors. it was not a documentaary. Study after study,even those supressed by the US Government agree, Pot is not a dangerous drug. it does not lead to hard drug addiction any more than drinking lemonade as a kid does. Any one addicted to heroin was going there, regardless of what they started with.
Here's a novel idea- bring our troops home, and put them on the border. With live ammo. Teach them how to say stop, and get on the ground face down, in Spanish.. Then shoot them if they don't.
Now we have created thousands of jobs for Americans, feeding , clothing, and supplying the troops here at home.
Are you all aware that the US military buys supplies from foreign manufacturers? WTF?
Just saying1043: So let me get this straight. AA is completely funded by its members? They pay for the building, electricity, etc. Absolutely no money is coming from the govt.?
seriously? How are we going to 'kill all the drug smugglers'? And how will we know when they are 'all' dead? Do you really think all the drugs that come to the US are coming through Mexico? And if we 'kill all the drug smugglers' suddenly users will stop using drugs? And bringing up Reefer Madness - really? This isn't the 1920s.
Unhappy you would be well advised to do some research before you end up with a foot in your mouth. The Seventh Tradition would be the one you need to look closely at.
PS. good luck with that case of Athletes tongue.
The Twelve Traditions Of Alcoholics Anonymous
(in the short form)
1. Our common welfare should come first; personal recovery depends upon A.A. unity.
2. For our group purpose there is but one ultimate authority—a loving God as He may express Himself in our group conscience. Our leaders are but trusted servants; they do not govern.
3. The only requirement for A.A. membership is a desire to stop drinking.
4. Each group should be autonomous except in matters affecting other groups or A.A. as a whole.
5. Each group has but one primary purpose— to carry its message to the alcoholic who still suffers.
6. An A.A. group ought never endorse, finance, or lend the A.A. name to any related facility or outside enterprise, lest problems of money, property, and prestige divert us from our primary purpose.
7. Every A.A. group ought to be fully selfsupporting, declining outside contributions.
8. Alcoholics Anonymous should remain forever non-professional, but our service centers may employ special workers.
9. A.A., as such, ought never be organized; but we may create service boards or committees directly responsible to those they serve.
10. Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the A.A. name ought never be drawn into public controversy.
11. Our public relations policy is based on attraction rather than promotion; we need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio, and films.
12. Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all our traditions, ever reminding us to place principles before personalities.
@mcrib
Reefer Madness was a anti-drug movie made by the goverment douchbag, and potheads don't kill people, crackheads,methheads,heroin-addicts kill people and drunkdrivers kill people, and second of all you don't just stop craving drugs especially hard drugs that takes rehab-detox etc...have you have heard of supply and demand? People will just get their drugs from some where else not all drugs come from mexico, especially the best bud, that comes from places like Cal.,Colorado,New Mexico etc... not Mexico only lil kids smoke shwag from mexico and people that don't no anybetter lmao, its ignorant dumb redneck republicans like yourself that keep marijuana from being legalized here in the U.S.
And illegalization doesn't work either. But at least if it's legal, regulated and taxed, then the people who use it will also pay for the privilege to do so, the same as with cigarettes, cigars, alcohol and prescription drugs. Are they legal? Yes. Do they get abused? Yes. But they're all taxed. And if anyone complains their cigarette tax is too high, there's not a lot of people feeling much sympathy these days. Quit smoking. In the meantime... pay up.
Legalize, regulate and tax. And who stands to benefit by making the word "tax" sound like some sort of a sign from Satan? Well you only need to ask who stands to benefit financially if drugs are kept illegal? Prison systems. Law enforcement. Border enforcement. Lawyers. Judges. Politicians. Drug manufacturers. Gun and ammo manufacturers. The list goes on and on.
As long as fear is profitable, people will create fear.
I second Rick's post. The prisons are full up as it is. Supply and demand would virtually cease to exist for the Mexican drug lords, and new legal buisnesses would spring up out of the ground. Who needs your dope when I can go pick some up from the local corner store that grows their own?
It's not open for debate anymore that "pot" is a dangerous drug that needs to be abolished. That American war on drugs or war on "sin" BS has simply got to stop. I'm fairly certain that Mcrib was being sarcastic in his statements.
As far as the article goes.... This is just an old fart that is being extremely over dramatic about things. Considering the geography he's probably one of those people that you wouldn't want your car to break down near his area and be forced to ask to use the telephone if you don't have reception. I used to live in Texas and I've met plenty of people that claim they wouldn't hesitate to shoot someone on there property without knowing the details of why they were there.
@9.6 -- "if we legalize drugs in our country our entire court system will fall apart and our police departments would be cut in half and god forbid if that should ever happen - illegal drugs are keeping our court system alive and well - all other crimes don't even come close"
Be careful, you don't want people to get confused with facts. We Americans love our courts, our police and our prisons, and most of all, we love crime. We love to watch TV shows about crime, we love knowing that our nation has more criminals than any other, and we love seeing our neighbors get locked up, because deep down, it is thrilling to know that our neighbors are bad guys who deserve to get locked up.
It would ruin our entire image of law enforcement and good guys vs. bad guys if people understood that most crimes are drug-related, and that most drug arrests are for simple possession of marijuana. We want to think of our prisons as being full of murderers, rapists and pedophiles -- not just a bunch of ordinary people who got caught with some weed.
Big Government's #1 goal is to perpetuate Big Government, and if We The People can't afford it, well we will just have to dig a little deeper and suffer a little more. We simply cannot allow people who smoke a plant to walk among us, which means we cannot allow our courts to reduce their staff or their case loads, we cannot get by with fewer prosecutors and public defenders, and we definitely cannot get by with fewer prisons and fewer police. God forbid, how would we ever catch and punish all the pot smokers?!
The peasants didn't build the wall, the Emperor built the wall - by using conscripted labor. As soon as they changed Emperors, the peasants started stealing the bricks to build what they needed; homes, granaries, etc.
The "Great Wall" was a waste, all to often, the locals let the invaders breech the wall if the bribe was big enough. The invaders didn't want to be farmers - they wanted the riches which the Court took from the farms and craftsmen. When you build a high royal house on the backs of peasants, they don't have all that much loyalty for the government. When you are at the bottom of a latrine, it doesn't matter all that much who's butt you see when you look up.
African proverb ... when Elephants fight, the only thing certain, is the grass will be trampled.
Several Observations:
1. A "war zone" without a fatality - or even a casualty - so far enables the feds' denial
2. As far as the drug, not human, smuggling: without the world's largest market in the USA, there would be no cartels.
3. Meanwhile, American service(wo)men, and billions of $$, are being wasted in Afghanistan and Iraq. Put the Armed Services on the borders, engaging in extensive "war games". Any smugglers get caught, "Gee, how unfortunate."
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
If the Feds won't do their job, then get your local sherrif to take care of business. It's your property and your life. Handle it and vote the wimps out!
Problem is so much of it is federal land, local law enforcement can't deal with it. They attack and retreat to the federal lands and Obama hasnt given the Border Patrol full access to chase them down, even though they have petitioned his administration.
Another failure of the Obama administration? You know, there will probably be some liberal somewhere who will eventually blame it all on Bush.
Bush had his chance to address the problem, but failed to. No President will address these problems, they want the mexicans vote. You won't find any help from you weak a$$ government.
Bush was no better at doing something to protect our border than Obama is. Neither was Clinton or Bush Sr. It's a lot easier to "tell" us things are better than to actually "make" them better. Talk is cheap, action takes a little more effort. We wouldn't want to do anything "Politically Incorrect" now would we?
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
Dan: Do you really think we have control over who gets to elect Mexico's next president? Sad excuse indeed for someone who really doesn't want to admit to Obama's failure of policies. It's been 3 years, when does this President finally grow up and start taking the heat for his own actions rather than what happened to his predecessors. I don't even think Bush blamed Cllinton this much.
Poor Dan, he hasn't been the same since his sister divorced him.
Pray tell DTOME, what exactly do you say the government is refusing to do to enforce the border? And don't give me that same "they refuse to do it" bull@!$%#; something specific.
What a laugh some of you people are! Reagan gave the illegals amnesty and every president since then has mostly ignored this problem. During the Obama administration, deportations are up and Border Patrols are up, but suddenly it's all about a Democratic president looking for the Hispanic vote? You should hear how foolish you sound!
Securing the border had been a problem for many administrations, not Obama alone. Consider the GOP congress controls the budget of government, the complaints of the people here would be better directed to their GOP rep. We had 2 wars going on and people recommend that we send 20,000 troop to sit watch the border - Get real! Last, the Texas gun nuts always about theirs militia and gun rights; why not get these people to volunteer to patrol and guard their owned state border. They can play wth their guns and do something useful for a chance.
Illegals are the same as street gangs. But yet the only people who fear street gangs are other gang members and people who live in the "HOOD". And what do those people do. some move. some make their homes very safe. other kill trespasser. But the Government does not help any of them. I find it funny that farmers who are likely Right leaning would likely bar a woman from TANF but whats millions spent to secure THEIR LAND! that is right people! ITS their land and they want you the TAX payer to pay for it. Just like the food stamp tramp wants you to pay for her kids so she can party. These LAND owners have money, money they should spend on fences, guard dogs, and security. Just like welfare moms should not have a car with rims, cause they could use that money to not need welfare.
How ridiculous. So you think the thugs should be allowed to overrun the entire country like the have their own. Wow, the stupidity amazes me.
And if these farmers stand up and fight them, liberals would be attacking them everywhere saying they are racists and feel no compassion for brown people. Please!!!!! We know by now, how you liberals respond. You can't have it both ways. Maybe Obama can grant them amnesty after they deliver the drugs ? (sarcastic)
Correction: stupid is waging a war which has no possible end and only serves to empower criminals while claiming it's all "for the children".
Listen to Law Enforcement Against Prohibition and please tell your representatives to help end this insanity, for good.
what i saying is, if you post no trespassing, put a REAL fence, and have dogs and security, you would be in your rights to kill people that are trespassing on you land. Also, i am pointing out that home owners across the nation are in the same boat. the police will not come to my home and camp out and keep me and my things safe. why should land owner along the border get more policing money then any other home owner in the whole nation. What next Bill Gates having the national guard keep his mansion safe. In TEXAS you can shoot some through the door! Also i should point out that people living in the HOOD are in the same danger and have been in the danger for 40 years. and the nation went on with business. Also, i don't know why if you don't pay your house payment you don't get kicked out of your home. for 40 year my mom worked as many as 5 jobs to keep her home. their have been homeless people down town for 20 years. why is this such a big deal now. OOO because it rich people that are losing money now, not just some working class drone that got behind. But now that every ones going to loss because that dude lost his house people care? What about all the homeless before them? who caries for them? no one ever cared before. but now it needed that we all keep wall street rich and not let them loss their shirts? And what i mean by all this is this, we live in a nation of mean people... and i find it silly that we don't just admit we are aLL heartless.
Well just the poor parts right? There has been 2 people killed, 3 people shot, and who knows how much gun fire in my neighbor hood in the last year. But I don't see any more of a police presents. In fact I see less.
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
Dan: I am also a gun owner. Why don't you explain to me again, why you're liberal friends are so much into gun control? Perhaps you should ask them before you speak? If you don't agree with their views, perhaps its time you switched sides.
You must be really naive to think that liberals don't make promises too. And poor Obama, nobody will listen to him including his own democratic constituents? But somehow you think that that makes it the fault of Republicans too, right? LOL . Let me save you the trouble. You have a spineless President. Better believe that that is the way it is, rather than thinking that its everyone's else's fault.
Have you read those "signed" statements?It doesn't matter which side you cuddle,they are sucking everybody dry and giving you lip service and bu!!sh!t for answers.Democrats in Congress don't even cry foul,because everybody there wreaks of fecal matter!Have you heard that the common direction in which this country is moving,with Congress at the wheel, is DOWN?Obama hasn't been much for management either.So,what's the solution?Dems will vote for their favorite incumbants,and repubs will vote theirs back into office.Why,because America is complacent.We don't want any commies in office,to make drastic changes,we want the commies already in office,who are owned by big business,unions,lobbiests,the rich banking system,and the likes of those who give these clowns and their family members big favors.You name them,they are crooked!
Not all people that are on Food Stamps,TANF, etc... abuse them some people depend on these government benefits to survive because they are two steps away from being homeless just wait unitl you lose your job, hope you have kids or are mentally or physically retarded because life's a b!tch without these programs and when unemployment benefits run out your srewed! More ignorant republican gargage die die rep scumbags
Government lies to protect its own interests. Bring the military home from their time and money wasting posts around the world and let them defend our country HERE! The Afghanis and Iraqis can fend for themselves among their heathen brethren.
agree 100% build a huge wall on the whole border.keep those greasy @!$%#ers out of our country
Canadians are not greasy.
Great Wall of China
thatguy1 have you ever heard of it?
Their is an age old way to let trespassers know that they are not welcome. Simply start putting the heads of the trespassers on a pole at the border. I would guess that a few thousand heads on poles would be a great help in discouraging people from jumping the fence and swimming the river.
Wait what am I thinking. That wouldn't be PC, and the demoncrats would say it is racist to do such a thing.
It amazes me that you refer to all Mexicans, including Mexican-Americans as "greasers", they are US Nationals and many of these so "greasers" have fought in all of the US wars overseas to protect your sorry @#$%
Muslim not heathen, and they would love for us to do just what you recommended turns out they dislike being in a real war zone as much as anyone.
Down with big brother, what you said is so wrong I don't think that racism would even make it into the top twenty problems.
Left or right, democrat or republican, the problem is real, the danger is real and the approach to addressing the problem appears obvious: secure that border with a fence, spy drones and/or other available technology. . . I know that would not be a 100% fix, but it would be a drastic improvement over the present sad situation . . . that U.S. taxpayers pay hundreds of millions in foreign aid while our southern border is a porous source of drugs, illegals and violence is a deplorable state of affairs . . . let's focus on the problem and work towards a solution.
We won't be able to start until November 2012 when someone who gives a hoot about this country is in office.
LMFAO do you think the republicans will give a sh*t, they are too busy courting them now, have been for the last 20 years. Quit dreaming. Buy a gun, before they ban that.
this won't be solved in washington. Drugs will never be legalized. It's considered political suicide, not to mention it would explode the unemployment problem. You would massively reduce the court backlog, you would dramatically reduce the need for prisons, parole officers, etc etc. Will never happen.
Who's to blame?
The fact is that there is no control at our borders and citizens who live there are not secure. Who is to blame? We have supporters for illegal aliens, we have sanctuary cities, and we have a government suing states for upholding immigration laws.
We pay our citizens not to work and illegal workers take the jobs. We have gangs controlling drug enterprises in every major city, and the government can't control this?
So who is to blame for this fiasco?
Obama, Holder, et al, They should all just resign and save us a lot of trouble.
I think it is time to put a stop to these so called sanctuary cities. If these did not exist, even less would be inclined to come.
alur, I believe no one has ever been so exact with so few words, and for a question, you are a master of reality. It would be refreshing if more people paid attention, then the answer would be more clear.
According to The Congressional Budget Office, illegals cost the American taxpayers $338 billion dollars a year, and going up. Free school, free welfare, medical, and jobs. Repeal the law that allows any child born of an illegal in the USA to automatically be a US citizen. That takes them off of the welfare roles. If a kid gets welfare, mommy and or daddy get it too, as well as a free medical card.
The Republicans reject any thing the Democrats propose. the Democrats reject any thing the Republicans propose. Solution? Reject ALL current incumbents, and send a new batch in. In two or four years, if they aren't doing the job, send them packing.
Uh, guys? This article is about border instability, not immigration.
Don't forget we have banks giving specialized loans with no ID(state) And the feds giving them awards for it DMV offering drivers licences. now that is crackdown or is that just crack
google FDIC honors brotherhood bank. it will make you blood boil
Toasty McGrath
Since you keep
askingtrolling the same thing about what the govt is not doing to secure the border here is a website to check out although I don't think anything would change a closed mind such as yours.http://www.borderinvasionpics.com/index.html#PhotoList43
Take a few hours to watch the many videos here -- there are some articles as well.
"border instability" is laughable -- it's wide open.
So in other words, your answer is "I can't answer that, Toasty."
Which is why I'll keep asking this until one of the teabaggers finally says something. Tt's been two years now since I've been asking this, though; I'm not holding my breath.
Maybe you should stop asking and start listening --
Still waiting on an answer. I'm listening intently, DZ.
Sometimes a concept is baffling not because it is profound but because it is wrong.
Hell, they are safer than ever; just ask the murdered Border Patrol Agent.
The safest city in America has more than 1 murder a year. Why not complain about that as well?
Yeah right, so the American government insist on you safety. What a joke.
stop spending billions on war bs and build a 50 foot concrete wall the whole length of the us mexico border,keep those greasy bastards in there @!$%#hole
Stop voting democrat and you will see a big change in how the govt. handles the immigration crisis including those who deliver drugs across our border.
So thatguy1, do you think a wall on the border will keep them from going further up the coast?
Keep attacking the result and not the cause and you will always be doomed to failure.
Unhappy, if my memory serves me correctly, the current Gov. of Texas has an (R) next to him name, correct? What did I hear about his state giving in state school tuition to illegals?
Both Democrats and Republicans have dirty hands.
Besides, we have seen several Presidents, both Democrat and Republican, just sweep this issue under the rug. How about wagging your finger at all of them, OK?
If only Red State businesses have not relied upon and hired "illegals" for the last 40 years.
You reap what you sow.
Prosecute businesses that hire "Illegals" to the fullest extent of the law.
By the way, look at the agricultural catastrophe that Alabama is facing by passing Reichwing, anti-Immigrant legislation...billions being lost.
Schedenfreude.
Indeed. Unfortunately,bored hicks thinking they are "big" by targeting what they only THINK are those as useless as themselves from other countries persist in pretending that somebody else is stealing the job they never intended to take in the first place.
Let me hear just ONE rebuttal from a fruit picker American who couldn't find a job because of the damn Mexicans. Just one. Ever.
Won't happen...
I don't know anything about fruit picking, but I do know my brother can't find a job in construction because of these " damn mexicans".
Is your brother Black?
Maybe some of those " damn Mexicans" are really americans...But to you anybody that is not a white Anglo-Saxon is no good correct ? Everything you say has racial undertones UNHAPPY you are just an old outdated has been and your kind will be gone soon...The things you type are not just politically incorrect they will get you punched in the face in most of America including by me before I started following that old turn the other cheeck thingie...Your brother can't get a construction job because he either doesn't work as fast or for as cheap as others period...And you are always on here preaching all that free market junk so how come it's not good enough now when your bro can't get a job ? huh ? Oh it's different then, you hypocrits on the right need to get all the hate out of your heart.....
Until this country ends prohibition, the ranchers need to shoot to kill. A few vicious guard dogs may be in order as well.
Uh Marlene? That's murder. It's also a crime you will go to prison for.
You may also wish to consider that if these smugglers are actually working with/for cartels - shooting to kill could get the farmers a much bigger problem!
But Toasty, If someone comes on to your property and threatens you or your family, I'm sure that defending yourself would not land you in prison. The situation seems more like kill or be killed.
OldGirl: That's where the vicious dogs come in. It's truly repugnant to me that American citizens have to put up with this on their own land.
Here's an interesting website I came across -- hours of video of the border being invaded for your viewing enjoyment. The folks on the border should be scared.
http://www.borderinvasionpics.com/index.html#PhotoList43
The govt has actually blocked access to this site from govt computers -- Ha.
Desertzonie: Very interesting website.
Yes it is -- and to think there are still some folks here that think our govt is doing a fine job securing the border.
does anyone seriously believe what the government says
Time for Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and Alabama to leave the union and start their own country as the Federal government has abandoned them.
We tried that in about 1862. It didn't really work that well.
If Arizona secedes, I guarantee you that us patriots in Baja Arizona will remain loyal to the United States of America. You know, for the whole three and a half hours the TexNMAzAL secession lasts...
Why don't you racists just move to the outback with the leader of your cult ( Fox Nation ) Rupert Murdoch and his luetenant's Oreilly and Hannity?
legalize drugs and you won't have a problem with traffickers crossing the farmers land. They'll be going through customs! The farmers should stop whining and start asking for REAL solutions instead of propagating fear.
So in other words, all we have to worry about is, them smuggling in illegal immigrants? Didn't you actually read the post? You legalize drugs and people are still not going to go through customs. Why risk going through customs and being turned away when you can just hop across the border for free. No import tax needed. It doesn't work for illegal immigrants and we already have a system in place to take of those people. What makes you think drugs will be any different?
He is already confused UNHAPPY. Don't make it worse. And I don't think any body read the story. This isn't about illegal immigrants. It is about the smugglers that bring them and the drugs.
I think he really means, that if you legalize the drugs, they'll be produced here, in better quality, and amount that it theoretically would kill the importation of drugs by illegal aliens(they do say that the best pot in the world is grown by the us govt). Again it would never happen.
I think that the best way to solve this problem is through force. While it would take many more reasources to brotect this large border than the DMZ in Korea we certainly have the capability. Are we not proud of having one of the most powerful militaries in the world? We have 45,000 troops coming back from Iraq, those that stayh enlisted could go towards this. Is this real danger not more important than what goes on in afgahnistan? It is true that the terroorists are for the most part based in countries like that, but before we deal with potential threats we should deal with the real threat on our border where our fellow citizens live in fear, not poverty, or unhappiness, but true fear of a foriegn power.
The one thing I cannot agree with however is the disparging comments about Obama. While is not doing the best anyone could ever do he is doing his best, something we should be atleast somewhat appreciative of. If all of you think you are better tha him run against him, the people of our country apparently want him, so he is here. This is why we are a democracy people.
Nixon's "War on Drugs" is directly responsible for this. Clinton's NAFTA is directly responsible for this. Where possibly are the mexicans getting all their guns? The U.S. of course.
end prohibition, end the drug violence.
Slick Willie,along with a Republican Congress,gave us permanent favored trade with China,allowing China to import cheap made goods to the U.S. at drastically reduced rates. Imports increased=job loss increased.What a deal for us!We win,again!You figure it out,and after you do,who is in charge of our economic prosperity,and the border safety?We are in DEEP doo doo people.
And Bush II let the Assault Weapon Ban expire, which is when this massive upsurge in violence all started.
BS ..... 100% inaccurate and a false statement. It has started because Odumba put weapons in the hands of the runners so he would have a reason to squash our 2nd amendment right, not really a issue since he won't be around to do that but that is the reason why border violence is up.
Sorry if you don't like to hear it, but you can't change historical facts, Perk. The Assault Weapon Ban expired, and within two months you saw the first border towns getting shot up in Mexico. These initial massacres were just for fun, too. The cartel soldiers wanted to try out their news toys; guns that were just made legal by George Bush. Ever since there's been a steady increase, and it all started when the Far Right let the AWB expire.
Toasty the righties are a paranoid breed..They think a few sensible gun-control laws means next they are gonna take all the guns...Even though the ban was in effect for all those years and they never did...I actually believe in a pure definition of the second ammendment where we should be able to have whatever the government has and be able to carry anywhere,anytime but I don't get all paranoid when they do make laws..For one I am an American and I will have a gun no-matter what they say....Secondly like I said the law is sensible but I do think they should have to change the constitution to make any laws...I know that last statement was a little contradictory and that is because I don't think I am smarter than the world..
If the officials in Washington say our Borders are safe, then why were 3 drug smugglers found shot to death execution style just west of Nogales, AZ? Drugs are still streaming across the Border in and around Nogales, AZ.
If our borders are really safe, than our government officials should nave their offices on or near the border to prove that what they say is true!
Better yet all the ones we catch put them on a bus to D.C.
What a disgrace. I am so disheartened by the fact that we as a sovereign nation are doing next to nothing to protect our land. I know the Border Patrol and other law enforcement people make the attempt, but is is impossible when the government, Obama, Holder, et al do NOTHING, In fact, Obama encourages and supports these thugs and criminals reigning over our country.
Oh No, you are so right . . . but sadly, this has been true of both parties over many years . . .
Enough, They all mistakes, How mr. prefect president reagan? Remember Iran-contra. Get over that, even mr. sleep around president clinton, Remember Wako. Lets see, and remember mr. passive president carter, the hostages. Oh and remember Mr. I am not a crook president nixon - viet nam - and in that same vein, Mr mission accomplished president bush, remember Weapons of mass destruction, or invading Iraq. See, they all have screw ups. GET OVER IT.
Iran contra was in exchange for hostages when they stormed the American Embassy. Don't you read? My problem is Obama is he's too busy sucking up to the muslims in the Middle East when he should have been dealing with this at home. Perhaps he needed to go on another vacation?
All of should stop complaining over this dam matter. Its stupid how we blame other countries for whats going on. What we call "U.S. Citizens" are the people that buy all those drugs they smuggle from other countries. Come on why would Mexicans smuggle all that drug, just for the fun of it. NO! Because Americans give them cash for those dam drugs. Stop with all this stupid presedential crap. Obama was given a country in which it was already screwed up. One other thing a lot of violence is committed in America as well. So basically we should all watch our backs from everyone, not just immigrants.
Move your family.... Night vision.... Target Practice.... Charge others for target practice $$$
BYOB (bring yer own bullets)
About every 30 yards apart, have head sets to communicate and a spotter. Run 4 hr shifts and set up decoys about 40 yards down range between each shooting lane. ;)