Sven: I once lived and learned in Madison too. I guess that's where we received our "education" in more ways than one. If they don't like it, fire them! They should thank God that they don't live in Bahrain or Libya. Have a nice day and eat some WI cheese.
All hard working tax payers in the private sector have had to contribute to 401K's and health care, as well as begin subject to employment at will., for decades. And none of us have automatic wage increases tied to anything.
Why should teachers and workers in the public sector (hard working as they may be) have it any different.
The posters above me are obviously not economists. As much as people like to bitch at unionized workers they are getting pensions because they are not being paid a market wage. If you actually had to pay teachers what they would get for having a college degree (including a normal share of employer benefits and 401k) then you'd lose more money than you are now. A study was done recently in California to support this. A teacher in NJ (one of the highest paid states for teachers) after 6 years of teaching makes about $50k a year in salary paying 1.5% of their benefits in. An accountant in NJ with the same amount of experience makes about $110+bonus(about 10k a year) paying in about $500 a month in benefits. The math is such that a teacher is underpaid based upon the market.
Basedrum...for one thing you are comparing based on time spent on education alone...they are two totally separate industries. That's like saying a biochemical engineer should be on an equal pay scale to a high school guidance counselor.
Also, the teacher works 31 weeks a year, gets tenure, can retire with pension after 20 years at 80% of salary...not to mention I suspect that study took one of the lower paid teaching positions and compared it to a higher paid accountant. I know plenty of accountants that aren't making $110k a year.
On top of that, the study was done in California, a state that is going bankrupt and doesn't have a clue how to manage public sector pay.
Lastly, your statement that unionized workers are not being paid a market wage is exactly incorrect. They are getting more in 8 out of 10 professions.
USA Today is a legitimate newssource wouldn't you say?
Also, the teacher works 31 weeks a year, gets tenure, can retire with pension after 20 years at 80% of salary
none of that is true. They work far more than 31 weeks out of the year (just because the kids aren't in during the summer doesn't mean all the teachers just do nothing), and they DO NOT get to retire after 20 years as 80% salary.
So do the math. Even if that's the case the most a teach in my town can make is $103k after getting their doctorate and working more than 25 years on the job.
Even annualizing that value you get $135k. What do you think someone who is already making 110k will be making at that point 25 years into a business?
Ummm...Joe, that "study" is literally my household with myself as the accountant and my wife as the teacher in NJ. She is actually highly paid because she was able to start at step 4 rather than step 1 in her school district to match another districts offer when she graduated college.
And just to be clear this is equating a degree in accounting with a degree in mathematics. I love accounting but I even know that its much much more difficult getting a degree in Math.
And yet you dismiss a study done based upon numbers (not opinions) because it was done in california? A state that by your assertion is probably paying their public employees more than they should be? I would think that would lend more validity to the findings.
Sorry, pal - but I believe your math is fuzzy and wrong. There are very few teachers in NJ who only make $50K per year. Most make closer to $100k. However, giving you the benefit of doubt, how about the fact that you cannot fire a teacher and the only recourse is to put them in a "rubber" room and let them watch soaps all day and continue to pay them.
Also, for the 36+ years that I worked, I had to put in a minimum of 5% of my salary into my pension. I also had to put in any contributions to my deferred comp. My employer did not match a penny for many, many years in either. Why do teachers deserve better than what I had to do.
Actually I think we are missing the more broad point of this situation. A court will (probably) never allow this law to stand as is. You can't restrict the ability for people to unionize.
"The story around the world is the rush to democracy," said Sen. Bob Jauch, D-Poplar. "The story in Wisconsin is the end of the democratic process."
And there's the proof. Democrats seem to think "democracy" is when they get their way, not when the elected officials vote yes or no with a majority winning.
If you actually had to pay teachers what they would get for having a college degree (including a normal share of employer benefits and 401k) then you'd lose more money than you are now.
Anyone who entered that field "for the money" went in with the wrong reasons. There's lots of college graduates working at Denny's.
Unions, and particularly public employees unions have had way too much power for way too long. This is a great step in the right direction and a great place to start cutting the fat. Hopefully this will be highly contagious.
I hope this sets a precedent for other states! I like in California and we are being choked to death by unions!
Our idiot politicians are bought and paid for by the government service unions, and most of the laws drafted in the state are tailored to benefit the unions at the expense of the taxpayers! And we pay some of the highest taxes in the Nation!
Unions need to be put in check! They are necessary when dealing with a large company that could potentially abuse its workers, but if they get too big and too powerful, they become a malignant tumor and begin destroying the host(s) they depend on at the expense of the workers.
Look no further at Airlines, Automotive, Aerospace, Entertainment and Manufacturing to see how unions have driven a ton of business out of the country and reduced the productivity of a lot of more sympathetic or less wealthy companies capable of outsourcing the (in some instances) grossly overpriced labor.
Personally, I don't think that public employees should be allowed to unionize at all...the state is already governed by voters and representatives, CBA's and unionization is redundant and is a conflict of interest against the voters of the state
basedrum777 : This law isn't restricting the people's ability to unionize. Read the article.
For your benefit, since you did not read the article:
Under Walker's plan, state employees' share of pension and health care costs would go up by an average of 8 percent.
Unions still could represent workers, but could not seek pay increases above those pegged to the Consumer Price Index unless approved by a public referendum. Unions also could not force employees to pay dues and would have to hold annual votes to stay organized.
Another part of that quote that is very intersting is that these people would be paid in accordance with this "index", which means it's probably based on some average... and more importantly if they want raises beyond this index - as a group - it has to come as a descision from the voters. That's a unique step that eliminates potential party loyalty of unions to Democrats.
Otherwise, when your state's budget isn't balanced... something has to give. This is only a part of their budget shortfall... only 300 million of some 3.6 billion. I think that for what they are trying to pass... requiring these public employees to put more money towards their own benefits instead of "taxpayers"... that it's a hell of a lot better than simply firing 6,000 teachers. After all... education is important.
Real substance to criticizing this move will come in the future and what other areas they target to make up the remaining 3.3 billion dollars they are missing.
In my state... or rather Commonwealth, they slashed out a lot of public programs to cover the gap... people weren't happy about it, but the budget got balanced and I think everybody is happy about that. They need to give up on the whining... be grateful somebody is willing to work a solution to help them keep their jobs.
Unions have become the tyrannical monsters that the old corporations once were. They wield their power and use their resources to crush otherwise sound economic proposals that don't favor them. Unfortunately, it's just another sign of the times that we can longer find a middle ground for constructive bargaining, instead of being forced to extreme measures. The Unions brought this upon themselves because the writing has been on the wall for decades. The police and firefighters unions must be included as well!
Sorry unions, but you're now in a world where you can no longer have your cake and eat it too!
basedrum777, at 110K with only 5 years experience you are a very well paid accountant. Most accountants (even ones in Jersey) don't even come close to that in their careers. You must work for an investment bank in north Jersey or something.
I live in Milwaukee, nice way to go Walker and thank you republicans. I hope we all will enjoy what's coming up, Next is to get rid of Minimum wages, get rid of the labor laws then companies can pay you as low as they want maybe $2 per hour like in China I mean $2 per day and no companies will send jobs over sea. I don't care because I have enough money and it actually gonna save me money. It is a win for WI and America HEHEHEHE.
There was a time where the workers needed a voice but that time has passed and I agree Unions are a big problem, with threats of work stoppage to get their way is extortion plain and simple, and I'm a DEMOCRAT .. not all democrats favor unions!
Reusable bag fan: I think our President should assume military control over the US of A, given that so many states are claiming to be in a state of emergency.
I think he'd like nothing better. Beats having to come up with (and hide) his 200,000-member Praetorian Guard.
Beware of what you ask for. You are shhoting at people doing jobs for the ingrateful public. In my humble opinion, teachers should make 3 to 4 times what they are now making. Kids and their parents are A-holes.
Take away one of the only good points to the job and nobody will do it.
Someone on this post mentioned the un-employed workers will jump at the job. Think about this.... what are we going to be getting? Most of the teachers now have master's degrees.
Teachers are needed and unappreciated, this will kill the profession.
I am a 21 year member of a union that is affiliated with the AFL-CIO. A small, but growing group of members like me have been advocating with our unions for years to work with local governments to help solve the fiscal problems and not make them worse.
1. We realize that if we get everything we want our taxes go up just like everyone else.
2. For every dollar a Democrat gives a union, they take two back in taxes.
3. Unless we get the state, and federal budgets under control our pensions mean nothing. Uncontrolled spending leads to massive inflation and massive inflation makes our pensions and savings worthless.
The only thing my union has done for me for over the years is take nearly 15 thousand in union dues from me. Had I been able to keep this money in an account, with compounding interest over the years I would have a nice pot of money. Instead, my dues were used in part to promote democrat candidates and bail out bad employees who should have been fired long ago.
My union agressively fought the state when it switched all state employees from a defined benifit to a defined contribution (401k) style retirement years ago. In hindsite, that switch to a 401k has kept my state from an all but certian bankruptsy in the future which.... would have ruined the pensions for all those retired, and in the old system.
Good for WI. They are doing what they need to do to protect the taxpayers, AND state workers. By shutting down the schools they are enraging countless parents working multiple jobs who now have to take time off work (lose money) so that the union can throw a fit like a bunch of entitled babies. YOU ARE MAKING IT WORSE FELLOW UNION MEMBERS! wake up and see your union leadership for who they really are DEMOCRATIC goons!
And they have a choice to take their salary on a nine month cycle or on an 12 month cycle. If they choose the 9 month plan, they take home more each month but have to fend for themselves over the summer. If they take the 12 month plan they get less each month, with the extra being used to stretch over the summer months. Either way the salary is the same.
Now then, as for those nine months of work, if you haven't been in a public classroom recently you have no idea how difficult the task of teachers has become. The students are, by and large, disrespectful, lazy and rude. There is very little that the teacher or the administration can do to impose serious consequences on students for disruptive behavior besides send them to detention centers, which they consider to be a vacation from class.
The parents don't support the teachers because almost every time you have a problem with a child and attempt to contact a parent they are either unavailable (after intentionally changing their phone number to avoid calls about their nightmare kid) or if you do manage to get someone on the line the first response is always "Well what did you do to get my kid in trouble?" and second, "What do expect me to do?" How about discipline your kid and teach them some proper respect?
Most of the disruptive behavior and negative attitude is a result of kids being placed in classes such as freshman Algebra, (the lowest level math class we are allowed to offer), which they are woefully unprepared for. The kids don't know their basic multiplication facts, they add and subtract by counting on their fingers, and I'm supposed to teach them algebra? And then, when they don't understand it, it's because I'm an ineffective teacher who's tenure should be revoked?
Instead of putting so much unreasonable pressure on teachers to manage a nightmarish classroom of disruptive students who don't care and aren't interested in learning because they know they'll be automatically promoted to the next grade no matter what, how about we end social promotion policies which keep moving these kids through the system when they haven't even mastered basic skills?
Seriously! The first thing this corporate shill (Governor) did in office was give large corporations massive tax breaks. Why does this all sound familiar! According to several independent sources what had been essentially budget "neutrality" become a short fall!!! Guess who is making up the difference - working Americans. But that isn't the only reason why you will see this trend going Nation wide - the Republican's are going after the collective bargaining of "all" state and federal workers because they have traditionally supported the Democratic Party. This is POLITICS
dressed up as fiscal austerity (Carl Rove said as much - the only honest thing he has ever said)! Corporations will in the end be the only entities that benefit from Citizens United and armies of lobbyists. Wake up people - in the end they will privatize everything including the police and the fire department. Your house will burn if you missed a payment and Black Water will be the local constabulary. You think I'm joking - when it is all done and said America will have the look and feel of a some science fiction movie where morally bankrupt and yes overtly evil corporations are the government and run everything! Are economy was tanked by Republican deregulation and Corporate greed and now there using the outcome as a pretext for going after American workers!
'Scuse me, I live in NJ. Depending on where in the state and what union, you could be talking $42K or $62 to start. Could be 0 they have to pay in for benefits or it could be 5%. Ten years ago, my nephew-in-law in northern NJ was $78K and his wife (also a teacher) was $72K. Each had only been hired into their districts for a couple of years. 0 for benefits. 9 months a year. He was sucking the system dry for free master's degree, and later his doctorate for free thru another state's system.
It used to be that engineers were likely to be the highest paid coming straight out of college, it changed over to teachers several years ago. The teachers beat out what was once an average of college grads at $36K/year.
So here I sit in the private sector (yes, had college), barely hitting $35K for a full year and paying what amounts to 20% for my benefits.
So, let's get rid of the unbelievable union benefits (extorted), fix the wage scale, gov't workers have to contribute toward benefits. Before we even do that, we should get rid of all the excess administrators. Example, one of my local middle schools of 900 students has 3 vice principals, one for each grade. Dump 2 and save at least $250K a year.
So people, wake up and talk with your neighbors. Each of us has a story to tell and info to share.
The interesting dilemma here is that the parasites that have been feeding off of the host's resources are starting to get too big and requisitioning too many resources.
Just like viruses and bacteria in the human body. There are some organisms that are able to operate symbiotically with the host. But it's a delicate balance.
Well, in the case of the government, the host is dying. Unions and corporations are now consuming too many of the host's resources (i.e. taxpayer wealth and the middle class).
Unions seek not the employment and safety of their workers but only to sustain the power of the union over their host company/government.
Corporations seek ever-greater handouts and even more lax regulations. Considering that over 50% of the Fortune 500 companies pay less than half of the effective corporate tax rate is just the tip of the iceberg. The SCOTUS-Citizens United and corporate personhood decisions are the beginning of the end for public representation and what's left of a fair election process.
We are rapidly approaching the grand crescendo that is the current US.
I figure in about 100 years, people will be so fed up by the situation that a massive reboot of the US government and it's representatives will occur. It will either look like the French Revolution or India gaining freedom from the British.
Lord knows how long the reboot will take however. Feudalism took centuries to end...I cringe at the thought of how long a corporate oligarchy will last
Unions do not work for the workers anymore they are an instrument for politicians to get support from union members and their dues, even many of them do not agree, how much money from unions go to support corrupts politicians to get in power , this mob of fat socialist do not care about how much money ( our money ) the government has to spend giving privileges to government workers , that we private employee do not have. Pass the Bill.
I live in Cali too, and if you think BOTH parties are not bought and paid for, then you need to read your name again. Democrats are bought and paid for by unions who push for pensions that we can not afford, Republicans are bought and paid for by Corporations who would gladly poison an entire community if it increased their profits. Pick your poison.
Do we have a problem with unions? Yes, the pension plans will probably bankrupt the state. Something needs to be done. Does that mean I am willing to elect a Republican who wants to eliminate the EPA so that corporations can pollute our beaches even more? HELL NO. I happen to enjoy swimming and surfing in the ocean.
And you can not blame unions for outsourcing, there were plenty of PRIVATE (non-union) businesses here in Cali that outsourced thousands of jobs. Even if you eliminate all unions, the outsourced labor is still cheaper. Remember, it all comes down to profits.
Both parties have their dark sides. We need to find a middle ground. BTW . . . I am a liberal who voted for a Republican governor.
Rodney, you make some good points. Glad to see someone gets it. I wonder if other members realize how they have been bled over the years by their own unions, because it's just another tax. It's privately run, but just another bureaucracy with occasional ties to the mob.
The interesting dilemma here is that the parasites that have been feeding off of the host's resources are starting to get too big and requisitioning too many resources.
"Just like viruses and bacteria in the human body. There are some organisms that are able to operate symbiotically with the host. But it's a delicate balance.
Well, in the case of the government, the host is dying. Unions and corporations are now consuming too ma"ny of the host's resources (i.e. taxpayer wealth and the middle class)."
WOW. That sounds like it came from Der Ewige Jude, a propaganda film made in Nazi Germany that compared the Jews to rats - parasites on the German people. I'm just saying...
Rodney, thank you, some of know that there are many unionized workers who are thinking the same thing. Unfortunately, they're too afraid to say it due to backlash from their union and fellow workers.
Collective bargaining is one thing (and HR depts like it because it's one or two CBAs vs. individual agreements), but the unions suck everybody dry.
And they are paid for nine months out of the year, with the payments made across twelve months. The nine months that teachers work include evening after evening of creating lesson plans and grading papers, not to mention the endless worry about students who are sick or not performing up to ability. Try marrying a teacher: It will open your eyes.
Hopefully the people won't fold when the unionist (socialist) continue blackmailing the to get their way. I'm going to be taxed out of my house soon due to the high taxes which currently just under 70% goes to the schools. If they think that what Governor Walker is so unfair then quit and go into the private sector where you have to work and perform for your monies and you get less than half the benefits.
Union bashing is popular, but the level of Wisconsin eliminating it is dumb. And it is perfect that the opening post mentions Arizona, a state of the stupid when it comes to dealing with problems.
Again, you can in fact, blame the Fed for not dealing with problems. Unions have become bloated. Those of us who live in NJ are well familiar with the overpaid status of teachers and financial crisis. The difference, if I don't say so myself, is that the governor here is much more intelligent in the way he is dealing with it. Unions should never be eliminated, mainly because it makes no difference to 'eliminate' unions. At its most fundamental level, a union is simply a group of people that refuses to work as a negotiating tool. You can cry 'illegal' all you want...when you don't have workers show up, it really doesn't mean that you can get the job done.
Let's take an example: Reagan with the Air Traffic Controllers. Now, by the way, Reagan was absolutely right in firing all those workers. However, they were able to be replaced, though it wasn't easy. When it comes to a state of teachers, there is a number that you can reach in which kids simply couldn't go to school. Whether you get enough teachers to walk out depends on what kind of deal they are getting. Ultimately, its a union whether you call it that or not.
Anyway, trying to wrap this up: Unions have too much negotiating power, and that is what has made taxpayers angry. However, in any state with common sense, power has been pulled away from the unions by public education on abusive union tactics and having a backup plan for workers on strike. Perfect example: NYC's MTA union. Last time they had a strike, they bankrupted themselves and went right back to work because they weren't willing to deal with going to jail. If they were, they would have went to jail, but probably forced the city to capitulate. Obviously, there was a line they weren't willing to cross, and they haven't raised a fuss since. Transit is different fromteaching, but both are necessiteis in one way or another.
mikey mike, Do not blame the parents for all of this. If the government (including school administration) would stay out of child raising then teachers would not have disrespectful BRATS in classrooms. The teachers in the state that I raised my children were not allowed (by school policy) to discipline children, even tho, the state law said they could. I had to drive 28 miles one way from work to correct my child for misbehaving in class. Because, school policy stated the teacher could not. When I snatched my 6' 16 year old off the floor and made him sit in his desk the teacher warned me I could be charged with abuse. When I asked my son why he did it he said, because he could and there was nothing the teacher could do about it. So DON'T BLAME THE PARENTS,!!!
I've never been in a Union, but my husband has although it wasn't his choice. If he wanted the job, he had to be in the Union. Nice scam, eh?
Yes, historically unions had a place, but now with all the laws protecting workers rights they are nothing but organizations of intimidation and corruption.
You show me one good teacher and I can show you 10 that are there just because of the union and not because they are good. 90% of the problem in the school system is because the teachers go to the union and say we won't do this to teach the children, we can't do this to teach the childern, this isn't the way to teach the children. Thats why we don't have READING, WRITING, MATH taught properly anymore, because it might just show that a teacher is incapable of doing the job so they have the union to back them to keep them in the job. Now you will have to do your job and for the money you are paid no more will you be able to hold the children of this country hostiage so you can make more money! Try Walmart!
basedrum777, you can't say math teachers are underpaid because accountants make more. Your apple to orange comparison doesn't make sense.
Actually I think we are missing the more broad point of this situation. A court will (probably) never allow this law to stand as is. You can't restrict the ability for people to unionize.
True, you can't restrict the ability of people to unionize, but that's not what's happening here. You can do what Governor Walker is doing (assuming the Republican controlled state legislature passes it) which is diminish the power of those unions.
This is what happens when you run out of "Other Peoples Money". Govenment employees are a joke. They expect everything for free from other people. I get raises if i do a good job and make the company money, not for just being employed by the government no matter what kind of job im doing or how the economy is. Their is no way i could get a raise with this economy if my company was struggling. I have to pay for my own insurance and retirement plan. But these government employees want someone else to pay for theirs and they dont just want it they expect it. Then they run around crying and whinning when they dont get it.
Where I live its really a joke the government has their retirement set up where they actually get paid more for retiring than they do when they were working. All paid for by the taxpayer and every election they want to raise our taxes to pay for it. Well this is just the beginning, their is only so much OPM to go around. People have had enough especially with this economy when some people cant afford to pay for their own retirement or insurance but have to pay for governments.......
There is no reason for state employees to be represented by collective bargaining agreements. Unions served their purpose in the days of packing houses and steel mills. Protecting uneducated employees from greedy employers and unsafe working conditions was necessary 75 years ago.
College educated teachers and state workers only use unions to extort ever increasing salaries and benefits from the rest of us WHO PAY FOR THEIR SALARIES AND BENEFITS!!!!
Congratulations Wisconsin. Once again you are the first. This is change we can believe in and change that is coming to all Federal, State, and municipal workers.
I respect everything that unions did in the early part of the 20th century to make working conditions and wages livable, but so many unions have become power hungry demanding more and more unsustainable benefits for their members. Not just public sector unions, but private sector as well. My uncle is a retired union member (UAW). He has an 8th grade education, worked the line all his life, and told me stories of all the goofing off they used to do on the job. I have a business degree and work 60+ hours a week and have to make decisions that can affect millions of dollars and peoples livelihoods, but my fairly good salary for this is still $5,000/year less than my Uncle's pension pays him and he has health benefits for life too. Ever wonder why cars are so expensive? Here's one of the reasons.
Just for the record, the average salary of those affected by Governor Walker's proposal is around $55,000, which is a very livable salary here in Wisconsin. From everything I'm hearing, this is slightly below the average that private sector teachers make here in Wisconsin, but the private sector benefits package doesn't even come anywhere even remotely close to the benefits packaged that they receive. I wish I had exact numbers to quote, but I do know a teacher that retired at 55, and was earning $4100/month from her pension and has a great health package. I think teachers should be well compensated, but I just don't see how the current compensation levels are sustainable.
I don't agree with most of Walkers politics, and I certainly don't agree with the heavy-handed way he approached this or the fact that he exempted the three unions that supported him, but many of us Wisconsinites voted for him because he demonstrated that he was willing to make the hard decisions that needed to be made. Asking teachers to pay a small portion of their health package and pension is in no way an unreasonable request, and far better for everyone than the alternative which was laying off 12,000 of them. MSNBC and other outlets are focusing on the crowds raising their voice against this in Madison, but the silent majority of us believe that these cuts need to happen.
Teachers do not HAVE to join the National Education Association, nor their respective state association, or their local.
They can opt out of that. But as a teacher I will tell you that if there is no place at the table for negotiating salary, etc., then your schools will be stacked with unqualified people who will work for whatever a state's governor deems fair.
You can bitch and moan all you want. It is not unions. They protect rights, such as time breaks, safe working conditions, etc.
Hell - although I will have to suffer along with the rest of you, I think I would like to laugh my ass off when the Republicans tank the economy again and screw up our schools, making this a third world nation.
And how did all this get out of hand? When a black man was elected President. And we seem to think we should tell other countries how wonderful our democracy is. What a joke.
This quote from Einstein suits most of you: There are two things that are infinite: human stupidity and the universe. And I'm not sure about the universe.
Einstein had it right. The spread of stupidity is rampant, and there is no cure.
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - BLAME THE VICTIM! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
if we don't learn from history before unions, companies would just shot employees for organizing used pinkertan to do it. just like the miner down south guess who shot them for the company the goverment.
looks like we will be doing it all over again. walker going to use the national guard how will he pay for them.
bubba "You show me one good teacher and I can show you 10 that are there just because of the union and not because they are good."
thats funny, because i've only ever worked private sector jobs...and this holds true there as well. not because of unions, but because of crappy management.
and thats what it boils down to in public sector work, I know that they can be fired - it's just that power tends to corrupt, and those in power tend not to want to fire the people they like.
Working with the boss' daughter, who is worthless and plays on facebook all day...who shows up at 8:20 daily, takes a lunch and leaves at 4:30...and took off 35 days last year (she only gets 16)...i know im speaking the truth. If her dad didnt work her, she most likely would have been fired long time ago.
But inept management keeps her employed...same with many public sector workers.
You should be demanding better management, and at least with public sector (unlike private) thats something we can demand, and expect, and achieve if we collectively cared about it.
R U 1 "I don't agree with most of Walkers politics, and I certainly don't agree with the heavy-handed way he approached this or the fact that he exempted the three unions that supported him, but many of us Wisconsinites voted for him because he demonstrated that he was willing to make the hard decisions that needed to be made."
I think you just contradicted yourself there and didn't realize it. He clearly didnt make the hard decision if he chose to exclude Police, State Police and Fire from this...ya know, the folks who supported him.
Just politics as usual, union busting is more accurate.
They are the only threat to Citizens United, because they were the only "force" that could rival a corporations ability to spend on campaigns...and this is the first step in killing that.
I have a college degree in education, but I used it for only 3 yrs before I realized that I could never make any money, and had to find a new career. (By the way I was NEVER in a public school system) I am now closer to retirement than college, and make less than $15 an hour. Do I think government workers whould pay more for their pensions and insurence? yes. But can someone please explain to me how not being able to collectively bargain is going to SAVE the State of Wisconsin one thin dime. If this is a purely budget bill, then only things that save money should be in there.
I realize that many of you think unions are bad. But even though there are laws in place now to cement the rights the unions won for all of us, don't you realize that those are just that? LAWS. Laws can be changed anytime someone has the votes to do it. That is exactly what is happening here in Wisconsin right now. The state passed a law in 1959 giving the workers the right to collectively bargain. Now they want to pass a new law taking that same right away. If it can be done here and now with collective bargaining, why can it not be done with minimum wage, 40 hour work week, worker safety and anything else they can think of.
By the way I am not now, and never have been a member of a union, but I am afraid of what our country will be like when they are allowed to break all the unions.
Considering how many union CBA's have been tailored to safeguard pensions, healthcare and effectively tenure their senior members at the expense of the junior ones, I'd say that unions play a fairly major role in the incentive of a company to outsource, or a state to go bankrupt!
But indeed, many corporations are also deserving of a significant share of the blame! If you notice my entire post, you'll see that I have a firm contempt for both Left and Right...neither party is on the side of the American people!
Left wants the illegal alien (and sympathiser) vote (by abusing the 14th amendment) to bypass moderate Democrats trying to protect themselves from the awful externalities of rampant illegal immigration. While I agree with some of the Democrat's social policies with regard to a non-secular government and personal responsibility, and think that the Democrats have a better grasp on regulation and fiscal matters, I despise the handout-agendas that would allow many to be on welfare in perpetuity and others to exploit our country's generocity who have no desire to be American.
The Right wants to abuse the poor and middle classes to effectively fuel the corporate equivalent of feudalism, and in order to partly do that, they too take a lax stance on illegal immigration, lest they mobilize the Latino demographic to start voting against them (or at all for that matter). I can't stand the Republican party's social conservative, government-invasion of privacy and legislation of morality, and I recognize that while I like some of the GOP's economic agendas, they never follow them, and it's all just lipservice to increase corporate welfare/handouts.
I grew up in the barrio in Southern California. I have first hand knowledge and experiences for what it's like to see neighborhoods go down hill because of unfettered illegal immigration. Schools becoming crowded and underfunded because almost no one is paying property taxes. Hospitals in the area closing their emergency units because over 20% of the people coming in don't pay their bills, the crime, etc etc etc.
To anyone sympathetic to illegal immigrants, I highly recommend you move to Pacoima, Arleta, Sylmar, Panorama City, or East LA or the Inland Empire. That is what happens to the neighborhoods!
We need to get rid of as much government as posible they dont contribute or produce anything to the economy all they do is add to the deficate. Until we get rid of all this liberal coruption in the school systems teachers should be the first to get cuts with a bad economy....
Jessica - i beleive the logic of fire/police/Emergency being exempt is those are public saftey issues. People of all walks of life tend to not like public saftey being messed with. That is just my hypothesis though, i dont know if that is the hard line being towed.
Thanks to unionism and socialism, America has not produced a single SLR camera for over 50 years, no consumer electronic goods for almost the same period, and no athetic shoes for over twenty years. Once upon a time, America had a healthy auto industry. Today, Chrysler, twice bankrupt, is owned by Italian Fiat. GM, risen from the dead, is limping toward a recovery at half of its former self. Ford is mired in debt trying to stay competitive. America can thank the UAW for the remaining auto manufacturing factories. American garment workers are not so lucky. Nearly all apparels sold in America are made in Asia, Mexico, or Caribbean.
Unionism and socialism have also formed a new breed of gangsterism with Big Government. The gangsterism has bought corruptable politicians who pushed through anti-business regulations that ultimately cause the unemployment of millions of low-skilled laborers whose skill can not be compensated at minimum wage plus benefits. To make things worse, excessive regulations and high taxes levied by Big Government to support more social programs are additional disincentives to domestic manufacturing.
Run by gangsterism, America is no longer a land of the free but more akin to the former USSR.
Just so I understand this correctly: Companies should have the right to the first amendment and be allowed to give as much money as they want to the political process without disclosing who they are. And workers should not have collective bargaining power to make their lives better.
I sure hope the CEO's and the multi-millionaires treat us fairly this time!
My eyes are wide open thank you very much. My husband works 6 days a week, 10 hours a day and doesn't make much more than a teacher. In fact, if you take into account the pensions and insurance plans, he makes far less because he does not have a pension and we pay for 60% of our own insurance. He has worked for the same company for 30 years and will not be able to retire with a pension, nor do they offer a 401k, we've had to do it all on our own and guess what? WE HAVE. On top of that we worked our butts off to send our children to private school and still paid taxes to the public schools!
And answer this question - why can a private school provide a far superior education for almost half the cost of a public shool? Do you think the over the top benefits have something to do with that?
Why is it that Obama ran away from the voucher program like a cat from a bathtub? Because he knows that given the opportunity of private vs public, the private will win out everytime, which is the way it should be.
I would say the overwhelming majority of teachers DO care about their students and quality of work they do. I see a lot of issue with the systems..that include the school boards, teachers, and communities... that act as road blocks to sound strategies in education.
I alsobelieve the unions could care less about the the students or the communities and as such give full support to the State of Wisconsin in passing this legislation. The union isn't being taken away.. just much of the power they have acquired over the years is and its being given back to the people.
I work in the timber industry and ive had to deal with my kids coming home from public school telling me what teachers are saying about me in school. They sit their and tell complete lies to the kids at school and they dont get in trouble for it. Ive talked to pricipals and they say their not suppose to be doing that but yet nothing is ever done about it because i get it every year from atleast one teacher.
Ive been called a murder of the forest, Im destroying the environment, we kill every animal in sight if we can. Last year my son was told for every tree i cut down 5 deer or animals are killed. Hes been told we are suppose to replant 5 trees for everyone cut but they never replant anything. They say we are going to run out of air to breath if this is not stopped.
This is all a bunch of crap they can get a way with teaching this to kids in schools with no facts what so ever. My kids dont buy any of it and actually got sent to the office for disputing it with one of the teachers. But kids that dont know any better by not having parents or family in the bussiness are just getting brainwashed by all these lies......
Police and Fire were exempted from this regulation because the State can not allow them to strike, so they must be represented. However, their contracts will be based upon the wage scales of the other state workers, so it really doesn't change much by exempting them from this regulation, and it prevents them by law and contract from striking.
(q) Another tid-bit. Want to know why the unions supported Obama's Health care reform when 99.8% of full time union members already have access to quality health care?
(a) Because HCR forces everyone to purchase health care, and employers to provide it or pay a penalty. A union shop that bids a contract to "build a school" is at a disadvantage against a non-union shop that will always bid the job lower, because the non-union shop has lower pay and benefits. This is simply another cost passed down to the taxpayer as a result of HCR. Your future property taxes will be higher for the bonds you approve due to HCR...wait and see.
@skelmbc - Very nice example! Why don't we all try working hard to acquire our pieces of the American dream vs. paying into a group of lobbyists who are demanding they deserve MORE.
I bet you Gov Walker will be getting sized up for a Kevlar Suit if this thing passes.
So are we to take this as some sort of threat of violence from the left, the unions, the teachers, or all three if they have to take a decrease in pay? This is very interesting. I thought it was just the right wing nutjobs that threatened to shoot people.
Wisconsin teachers letting their students out of class to go to the PROTEST and some of the students don't even know what they are attending. I wonder if the teachers gave them "credit" for attending this rally ?
If you look at other videos (one posted below), you notice some of the "sideline" cheerleaders are probably teachers themselves directing the activities of these students at the protest.
15,000 ? You do realize that would not even fill one end zone section of Lambeau Field. Kinda weak for a blue state. Ah, we all miss the 60's when the Left knew how to protest. Remember Chicago, Daily,bashing some heads, the good ol'days.
And what about the children? All those teachers denying all those children an education. What about the poor children who now will go hungry without their Michelle Obama breakfast, lunch, and dinners? If their parents are forced to feed them they might get fat !
I don't see a lot of intelligent comments on this article.
Teachers don't need a union to collectively not show up for work. They just don't show up. Republicans in Wisconsin will get this bill passed. The problem is, it will probably be reversed and this group of Repubs will lose their jobs. Democrats will once again take WI.
Personally, I don't see why WI doesn't take a hint from here in NJ. You don't have to eliminate teachers unions. You simply have to cut the budget. If they want to strike over it, they'll lose because the public isn't on their side. They'll then get paid what they are supposed to, instead of some bloated mess. Wisconsin Republicans and Democrats seem to want to get a lot of attention paid to their egos, and in this case, it has given the Democrats a chance to be popular.
My Step Mother is a retired High School English Teacher for the State of California. Not only that she also served as President of the California Teachers Association.
She worked 9 months out of the year. However during the nine months that she did work, she had a portion of her salery held back and receive that portion for the three months that school was out.
I can't believe so many of you "don't get" why this bill in on the floor. Over the past several years, many taxpayers have either lost jobs, or have less income than they did 3 years ago. Yet, these same people are supposed to continue to pay for Public sector Union increased wages and benefits. Many states are strapped for money due to the downturn. It is about the money, it is not there, yet the Unions demand that their members continue to receive just as much as before. Where does the Union think the state is going to get the money?
Teachers should no longer be allowed to be Unionized. It is totally irresponsible to have a "sick-out." This is an extremely bad example to the children they teach. It is time for the Unions to go, they are now more a negative influence than a positive influence in America.
Seems most here are not differentiating between Private Sector Unions and Public Sector Unions and speaking of Unions in general. Big difference folks. These private sector unions are way out of hand and the teacher's union is high on the list. Gov. Cuomo...are you taking notes?
Joe, "Also, the teacher works 31 weeks a year, gets tenure, can retire with pension after 20 years at 80% of salary...not to mention I suspect that study took one of the lower paid teaching positions and compared it to a higher paid accountant. I know plenty of accountants that aren't making $110k a year."
====
.....Just to add, I have almost 5 years as an accountant with my company, and I make less than $40K/yr (I also have an MBA, but after being forced out of my job at age 56, I had to take what I could get, I was lucky to get this). I was a taxpreparer for HR Block for several years, and prepared returns for educators with over 6 figure incomes (no, of course not all teachers make that much, but it is not as draconian as some people make it sound, there were others who did quite well, one guy drove up in his BMV convertible roadster).
....Asking public employees/teachers to contribute a small percentage to their pensions and health care is not unreasonable, I cannot sympathize with their reaction to it. I would love to contribute to my pension plan, but my company doesn't have one. My wife contributes a large % to her health care premiums, but luckliy she has one, because my company also does not provide one of those as well.
....Finally, since Illinois (where I have the misfortune to live, but I do have retirement property in WI) is the closest state to Madison WI, their wayward legislators probably headed on down to Springfield, where they probably fit right in, the public employee and teachers unions are strangling Illinois.
Unions had their place and time,we can no longer afford them. Firemen, Policemen, State-troopers are no more important than any other job. People choose their field to work in, and shouldn't be exempt from this vote. No Union employee should be exempt!!! It's only pandering for money and votes during election time. The unions bosses are glorified bouncers. Have you ever watched how a union goes about trying to unionize a workplace? It is shameful with their strong arm tactics.
Let people vote each year if they want to be in a union or not!!! We can't afford them anymore.
SHAME ON THE DEMOCRATS, THE REPUBLICANS NEVER PICKED UP AND LEFT THE FLOOR. SHAME ON OBAMA
I live in a country full of house neggirs. Yeah, decency for the masses is a threat to us all. The only way to solve the problems is to go back to serfdom. We can't let the weathy accumulators pay their share of anything. That would be un american. You folks kill the unions. Years later, let's here you cry out. You will. You fools. Set a cap on yearly income and subject the overage to 100%. Why do you think that tearing down your compatriots aides you in your struggle? I think it's that you all accept the corruptness of the capitalist system (or any system) and just want to be the top. Why don't you work for equity. As if the foundation is less important than the penthouse. Get real. You sell yourselves.
Republican lemmings. The income of the middle class has gone down at exactly the same time as unions have decreased in membership and corporate profits have gone up. Time after time management said no to raises, so instead unions bargained for benefits and greater security, healthcare, something all American workers want, indeed had, not so long ago before all the mega tax cuts. It is also true that the private sector paid more, typically. Now corporations have eliminated pensions, eliminated unions, said no to minimum wages, and completely disrespected the labor of middle class Americans. Public unions have been holding the line in their communities. They have given back, they have not been receiving exorbitant wages. Their contracts have been negotiated with Republican administrations as well as Dem's. Corporations long ago raided pensions they claimed were "overfunded", now no one except the ultra fat cats get them. So now there exists contracts which the Republicans want overturned because of corporate ideology. Republican created depression, no problem, blame unions, Democrats, minorities, everyday working Americans, everyone except the almighty Corporation and Wall Street. Why do Republicans hate Public Unions? because they're the only jobs they can't outsource. No problem, eliminate public unions, eliminate government, keep the tax cuts for the wealthy, give them free reign, we all know how well they create jobs here. They wanted this depression so workers remain cowed.
Precisely the way the Liberals do each time something doesn't go their way. They either sue to overturn the election, smear the Right for doing the right thing and trying to stop the Liberals and Communists running the DNC, or leave the State as they did in OK a few years ago, to avoid the vote and show exactly how spineless they really are.
Can't act individually, they run in groups as the Rats they are, acting their way in your face, and killing America behind your backs. It's about time someone stood up against the Unions, especially the Public sector with the NEA and Obama's bigtime buddies the SEIU draining what's left after the Liberal rape of our collective Treasuries.
Only good Union is a Bankrupt Union, although they are all moraly Bankrupt to begin with. Whatsa matta, Dems, 'fraid of Louie and his friends with those lead pipes?
Now then, as for those nine months of work, if you haven't been in a public classroom recently you have no idea how difficult the task of teachers has become. The students are, by and large, disrespectful, lazy and rude.
Oh poor teachers! Ever work a customer service position? Try retail? Waitress? How about construction? Hey, I'm sorry you poor teachers don't have a classroom full of pretty, attentive students that worship every word. Welcome to the real world.
On top of that, this isn't just about teachers. What about all the janitorial staff for the state, the road workers, parks, etc?
Yes, all the liberal press is reporting is the "poor overworked teacher". Nothing about the road construction worker that took 6 breaks from leaning on his shovel for 8 hours to go have a smoke because those are "union rules". Nothing about the pension double dippers. Noo....we'll just put the "poor children that will lose so much' up in the spotlight and ignore the rest of it.
By the way, I am disgusted by the liberal press and their selective newsreporting (not defending Fox either....it would be nice to see someone actually report rather than twist everything).
This is heavy handed as regards removing all negotiating rights. It's also heavy handed if there are exempted unions and really heavy handed if corporations are given tax breaks and not expected to contribute to the welfare of the state. Having said that, I don't see where unionized folks should rely on tax payer largesse in order for them to live better than the average tax payer. They should contribute to their pension and healthcare funds. If they are protesting because they have to pay their fair share then shame on them.
sorry Basedrum...any "study" or "report" from Kookifornia is questionable at best
the bill does not take away their right to negotiate "salary"...but does address the states inability to continue to "freestyle" on all the benefits....THEY ARE BROKE...albeit not as broke as liberal kingdoms such as Kookifornia and New Dork, but broke just the same.
Who knew that public employees are now the new rich that do not want to pay their fair share or sacrifice for the sake of the country even as they receive hugh bonuses in the millions? LOL
Who knew that the public employees are the cause of the housing and financial markets/wall street crash or implosion? LOL
Many folks who are posting are just shill, trolls, lobbiests etc for the republicans/ blue dog democrats/ tea party/wall street/corporations etc.
These folks said the same thing during 2008 through 2009 regarding the auto industry..... blaming the unions and employees saying that the union employees were being paid too much, working too little and earning over 75 thousand dollars per year 'working' on the line..... which was shown to not be true. The auto industry has since recovered and making a profit and have paid back most of the loans.
They said the same about the housing market and the financial market/wall street implosion which pulled down the global economy, blaming it on 'poor' people who were supposed to have bought homes they could not afford..... when it was not true... Some folks said the 'poor folk' comment was supposed to be code word for 'black folks'. LOL
Who knew that there were that many black.... er.....poor folks in the USA buying homes when the financial implosion was due to corporate greed and mis-management.
Now these folks are trying to do the old divide and conquer thing again.... trying to set the middle class folks against each other/blaming the unions or trying to put a wedge between the private sector against the public sector while they toddle off merrily to the bank with their millions in bonuses.
There is even a divide and conquer thing going on trying to pit the old against the young with regards to social security/ medicare/retirement age etc. They even said social security was insolvent -when it isn't and there is a surplus. The impression is that Medicare is free.... when it isn't. Retirees must pay premiums, deductibles and co pays just like any other insurance.
One could say that once the unions are gone/gotten rid of, this country will truly be the United States of Corporate America..... Hmmm
Well folks are seeing first hand that elections have consequences..... LOL
Before anyone jumps on the Republicans are greedy band wagon, read the entire law that has been proposed. It does not break the unions, it does not deny the right of any employee group to unionize or belong to a union. It does strip the collective bargaining power away from the public employee's union with the exception public safety sectors. It is not reducing levels of coverage for retirement or health care but it is requiring that public employees pay a larger contribution to those benefits. No one is losing their health care or pension here, they are simply being asked to contribute more to it. In essence they aren't going to lose that money because they will get it back when they retire or leave public service. Federal law on pensions and 401ks govern that. 25,000 people are an extremely small percentage of the state's population and from watching the reports, most of those were college age young adults. The action taken by the democrats in protest is in essence that of the child that decides to take his ball and go home when he doesn't get his way. The state of Wisconsin should not be running a deficit and it is only in recent years where it has ballooned to the proportions it is today. Most public employees by virtue of their benefits and in most cases their pay scale far out earn those with comparable positions in the private sector whether those positions outside public service are unionized or not.
I just hope all of the union haters will be very happy when they and their children are working seven days a week for fifty cents a day. After all this is the only way we can compete with foreign labor.
How soon you forget, the republicrap majority in congress did exactly the thing you so cleverly blame on OUR PRESIDENT. People like you should just shut up and let others drag your sorry asp into the future. Idiots are guaranteed the ability to breed AND LISTEN TO GLENN BECK but there is no guarantee intelligent thought can be derived from such idiots. I say congratulations to people that FINALLY understand WHAT REPUBLICRAP CORPORATE THEOLOGY is all about. Their desire is to force people to work for nothing while they collect the rewards for that slave labor. As so many people look upon our military and all the sacrifice shared by millions due to their combined pain, I look at the pain and sacrifice shared by the millions of people in the labor force that endured the disgrace inflicted upon them by their employers during the fight for union representation. Without unions there would be no OVERTIME PAY, VACATION PAY, HOSPITALIZATION BENEFITS, INSURANCE BENEFITS, AND MANY MANY OTHER GAINS PEOPLE TODAY TAKE FOR GRANTED. Just let the corporate boss do as he pleases, you wouldn't be able to buy a loaf of bread with a day's wages. I said after the stealing of the presidency THE FIRST TIME, I would not vote republicrap again, well now I can say NEVER WILL I VOTE REPUBLICRAP, AND I RESERVE THAT NEVER AS BEING THE FIRST TIME USED.
DB: Thank you for the clairification. I found it interesting to read that union organizers from other states were bussing in protesters to fill the ranks. Also interesting to note that teachers were dragging students along to fill the ranks especially when some of the students interviewed stated that they weren't sure what the protests were all about.
Forwhatistsworth ie, not much: Your statement about eliminating republicans is very telling. Apparently you approve of a one party system similar to that of communist nations and other totalitarian regimes.
mygirl1..... And why do we have votes? If not to eliminate those who we believe will not represent us? How many votes do you think it would take to eliminate all of those corporate puppets? 357? 38? I would bet that 44 or 45 would work just fine.
As far as political ploys, this is one of the oldest tricks in the book.
As a young legislator and Whig Party leader, even Abe Lincoln himslef and others tried to escape out a window just before a vote to prevent a quorum when Illinois' State Capitol was Vandalia.
As he matured into a more seasoned political figure, he admitted to regretting that move and I'm sure these Democrats will when they look back on it.
Time to come back and do you job. As much as you don't like it, you have to vote on this piece of legislation or work to have it changed.
Running away from a problem never makes it go away.
A small portions of taxpayers. Evan at peak union membership they never represented much over 35% of the workforce, today they are less than 20% of the workforce.
You shouldn't favore one small portion over the whole - especially when their benefits and retirement are 2 - 3 times better than than the average person.
No.... But it sure slows it down. There are many ways to play when the game is rigged. And you'll notice that Lincoln got into the White House after he did that.
What kind of benefits do you think that the top 2% of the (And I use the term lightly.) "taxpayers" get?
Why would someone be jealous that some other middle class worker gets a few crumbs more than they do? The only reason I can think of aside from someone being a puppet for the "upper class", would be if that person was a total loser and just wanted to bring others down to their level.
I notice that the cowards didn't include the police and fire departments ....YET. I guess they think they may need them shortly.
I am amazed by all the yelling, this is what the man promised when he ran and I along with a majority of people in Wisconsin voted for him.
So what is the problem? The unions have ran our state to the brink of bankruptcy, all that the people are asked to to pay half what the public worker pays for health care (I believe they pay 1/4 now) and to pay for half the amount that the average worker pays for their retirement fund. Also, since employees of the state do work for the people of the state, then to get raises they need to get it through a vote.
Wow, how radical. Maybe the rest of the states better follow or they will be bankrupt, and I do not feel that the U.S. government should bail them out. If their unions wish to be greedy and bankrupt the state, then deal with the consequences.
DB Akron, Good point about the tax payers!! Also I no longer have no respect for the Teachers union for 2 reasons. First, the union president said that if Walkker get his way, Kids are going to suffer! OMG when did kids become a bargaining chip for the union!!! Second, My granddaughter skip school to protest for the teacher union, after a teacher asked her to do it for her, over 300 kids out of 1800 kids did this today, in Green Bay Wisconsin. Teachers sending kids to protest for the teachers union is wrong!! Talk about a Hitler propaganda style move!!! That teacher needs to be fired and the union needs to be removed for interfering with the education of a child!!! Now she is grounded for a week and she thinks that mom and dad are being disrespectful for not doing what a teacher asked her to do!!! Sounds like the teacher union has our children UNION BRAIN WASHED, SHAME ON YOU TEACHERS AND YOUR DISRESPECTFUL UNION, time to replace them all!!! Our tax dollars at work promoting the teachers union in school is totally unacceptable!!!! GO WALKKER!!!!!
If "Benefits" are a "RIGHT," then where are my RIGHTS? Under what law did benefits become a right to only union members? Sounds like a class action law suit against the unions for discrimination!! Oh the union privileges over the command peasants!!!
Ah, the demoNo party strikes again. Let the unions bankrupt the states and the fed, then see how things go from there.
Sure, everyone wants to be paid more. Unfortunately, those doingthe most whining likely aren't worth what they are paid now. Why? Because they spend too much time whining instead of working.
I didn't read the whole article, but I read enough to comment. Maybe the unions have gotten a bad name, but then again, how would you like to work in a Right To Work state? California tried it for 1 year and then it was reversed for good reason. Do you work 10 hours overtime in a week with a holiday and get only 2 hours overtime pay? Do you work 10 hours overtime in a week and only get time and 1/2 for your work? Do you work on a holiday and get standard overtime for it? What work situation pays doubletime? Say goodbye to doubletime. For me, that means I lose a few thousand dollars a year. Are you willing to give up that much because business intrests make the law?
You Faux news parrots are the most stupid bunch of idiots allowed to have a computer. If they are allowed to bust unions, how long do you think it will be before your non-union job is shipped offshore. This has nothing to do with balancing a budget, it is nothing more than an excuse to execute the marching orders of the rich corporations that want to pay third world wages, and further widen the gap of what their net worth is compared to yours. Here are some facts. When Christine Whitman was elected Gov. of NJ, the first thing she did was give her rich constituents a 10% across the board tax cut. That caused a shortfall in the budget, which she not only raised the cost of motor vehicle charges, she raided the pension fund to cover the shortfall, with a false promise to restore it. She didn't and now the fatman Christie is trying to pretend that pensions of unions are the cause of the states budget woes. Had she left that money alone, the problem wouldn't exist. It was fully funded. However, their plan is to lie, lie and continue lying(worked with WMD's) because it works. Just read the absolutely ignorant, uninformed messages posted here.
Right to work states don't seem to be having the level of economic problems that pro-union states appear to be having. Unions serve a purpose but when the unions essentially control the business then there are problems. What about unions running businesses into the ground with demands that are impossible to meet? Also, when union demands are essentially paid for by taxpayers then there is a problem, especially when the taxpayers are broke.
Forwhateveryou may think its worth: Relax little buddy, you're safe, this is the internet, we're typing here and the only thing of yours that I'll touch is my keyboard in response to your silliness.
Oh yes, And no accumulation of vacation time. If you don't take a vacation this year, do you get the money for the unused time or get the time passed over to the next year? Not here. Use it or lose it. Not 1 hour accumulated from one year to the next. No worker protections in pay matters.
mygirl........ What would you know about "Right to work states"? Most of them are in the south. What has taken place in the last several decades, since corporate greed has out trumped American pride, is big business moved from union states, to the "right to work" states of the south. There, they set up shop for a time to eliminate the unions that were attached to them when they made the move. Once they got that accomplished most of them headed a little bit farther south. To Mexico and left the poor ignorant, "I ain't wantn' no dern' union.", southerners in the dust with the rest. And as far as southern states being broke, there are several that have had to shut their state governments down because they ran out of money. They have not given state employees a raise in 3 years. So don't spew your lies and sing the praises about the "right to work" states.
OH...... And by the way. Don't worry about me being safe. You just need to look over your own shoulder "little buddy".
Oh poor teachers! Ever work a customer service position? Try retail? Waitress? How about construction? Hey, I'm sorry you poor teachers don't have a classroom full of pretty, attentive students that worship every word. Welcome to the real world.
On top of that, this isn't just about teachers. What about all the janitorial staff for the state, the road workers, parks, etc?
Yes, all the liberal press is reporting is the "poor overworked teacher". Nothing about the road construction worker that took 6 breaks from leaning on his shovel for 8 hours to go have a smoke because those are "union rules". Nothing about the pension double dippers. Noo....we'll just put the "poor children that will lose so much' up in the spotlight and ignore the rest of it.
By the way, I am disgusted by the liberal press and their selective newsreporting (not defending Fox either....it would be nice to see someone actually report rather than twist everything).
Wow. So you are comparing teacher's work to retail, customer service or waitress jobs? How much do you think it cost to get a BSN or Masters degree? Last time I checked, the jobs you posted don't even require a high school diploma. It's like comparing doctors to pizza delivery guy. I bet you would be glad if teacher's salaries drop down to walmart style minimum wages eh? The teacher positions might be easy to fill now....... but what happens when the economy recovers? Good luck trying to fill positions that only pay minimum wage that requires a BSN or Masters.
No wonder our public education been going down the tubes for years. People want world class education on shoe string budget.
TheTruth......Aren't some of the Southern states right to work states? I haven't read anywhere where they are well flushed in the state pockets and isn't there very high unemployment (and forclosures) in some areas that top above 15%.Hmmm
Thought I heard that Texas is deep in the hole deficit wise, like billions...... I wonder why? Hmmmmm
Thought I read/heard somewhere that when the gov took over the state, Wisconsin was budget neutral, and that the deficit is due to his immediate giving tax breaks to wealthy folks and corporations -even some out of state corps- that is running the state into this deficit. Hmmm
This move seem to be patterned off the move done by NJ Gov Whittman Gov and the present one Christie. Hmmm
If the Wisconsin gov thought he was so in the right why did he have to put the National Guards on alert? Why the bully tatic?
It appears that this whole matter is about breaking the Unions by the repubs on behalf of the corps etc........ But why?
Does anyone really believe that doing away with unions in this country will set this country on a sound financial path, really stop the jobs outsourcing, lower the cost of living, make higher education more affordable, open more trades schools, make the workplace safer or stop the slide of the workers wage, or increase the minimum wage, increase job security in the private sector etc in this country?
Posting your entire psycho-babble response in bold makes you appear desperate for someone to listen to you. Face it...you libs are losing ground and it simply kills you. I love it! Watching libs squirm is so very refreshing!
BZe1......... Exactly right! The only reason that Texas is doing a bit better is because the companies build most of their factories along the southern edge of Texas. Then they let the Mexican workers come over the border on work permits. They even have their children schooled in Texas as part of an agreement with Mexico for cheap labor. "Right to work" is just another way to say "Do or Die".
I see an Egyptian Sun on the rise here in the states.
Forwhatever: Seems we're diametrically opposite ideologically (no, really?) What disturbs me about absolute certainty is that often it is wrong. Your original statement about republicans needing to be gone as a party is absurd and one sided.
Democrats aren't the sine qua non of 'party of the common man' anymore than republicans are the party of big business. Americans have been shafted for years by members of BOTH parties. The divisions are for show and to keep people bickering so that they don't realize how badly they've been and are being shafted.
There is a fiscal crisis happening in this country. Both sides have good ideas and both sides have crappy ideas. Pandering to a voter base is not going to solve these problems, nor are class divisions and name calling. Once upon a time such behaviours could be indulged in because the crisis hadn't gotten to this point. It is way past time for this to cease. It's reminiscent of a husband and wife bickering about whose turn it is to take out the trash while all around them the house is on fire.
Anyone addressing the topic at hand? Democrats boycotting a vote? Right or wrong, at least they are taking a stand. Where are the right wing cheerleaders that think protesting is a good thing? All I read is the complaint that students were brought in by teachers to the protest. Seems there aughtta be one republican applauding the lesson of protests being taught to students. Let me guess, it isn't republicans doing the boycotting.
You are willing to have a corporation deemed a legal citizen but not a union? Please explain the difference. CEOs of corporations are treated while union workers are cheated? CEOs get big bonuses and told, it's ok, it's in thier contract. Unions are squelched and told thier contracts don't matter?
So, if we own a company, we have our rights, if we work for a company, we are to be slaves to them.... got it.
OverTaxedAgain....... (Probably on welfare.) I guess that "Sally" as you put it is busy tracking down how many times you have called people names on here. Does "Jethro" ring a bell?
And I'm sorry if you mistook my comment for a threat to someone else. (That is someone else isn't it? I mean you wouldn't use different names on here just to pat your own back would you?) But don't worry. I don't threaten. No threats are not facts. I deal with facts.......... Get it?
I love how the media and the career politicans blaming our economic downfall on unions and federal workers.
Last time I checked, the unions and federal workers didn't force our country in to 2 deadend wars that is costing us 160 billion a year, gave huge tax breaks to the rich and corporations, gave outrageous salaries to CEOs, give out predatory subprime mortgage to americans, and outsourced American jobs overseas while still posting record profits. Don't also forget that unions and federal workers didn't raid the social security funds and pension funds to pay for pet projects and wars while replacing it with iou's.
Rick: this is about class warfare, don't you get it. Us vs. them.
As to the Supreme Court, I also find their classification of Eminent Domain equally disturbing and the Faux news comment??? come on, is that the best you can do? Seems you parrot other media driven talking points and guess what? The media is controlled by six corporations, that's all, just six, and if the FCC keeps it up that number will diminish as well. So, where do we get our propaganda?
had-enough-470242: "Last time I checked, the unions and federal workers didn't force our country in to 2 deadend wars that is costing us 160 billion a year, gave huge tax breaks to the rich and corporations, gave outrageous salaries to CEOs, give out predatory subprime mortgage to americans, and outsourced American jobs overseas while still posting record profits."
I think you're a little confused. Federal workers (i.e. your illustrious government) had everything to do with your first 2 points, they enabled your 3rd and 4th points, and unions had everything to do with the last point.
mygirl1........ I could point out that it was you who tossed an insult my way that got the whole argument started. But we'll just drop that one and get back to the problem.
I agree that we are in bad shape economically. But I'll just give you a short peek through my eyes for a second and maybe you will be able to see my point a bit better. I recently was invited to go on a cruise in the Bahamas, where I spent time on a private Island in a 5 million dollar beach house. We wined and dined at the cost of over $1,200 for one meal in Boca Raton . We laid in the Sun, went deep sea fishing for several days to the cost of over $20,000.
Now..... The fellow that took me is worth over $50,000,000 and is listed in Forbes. He has 3 private planes including a Lear jet and 2 sea going vessels. He's a great guy, but at his age of 35, with so much wealth accumulated I had to get curious. He grew up poor, so it wasn't family money. Upon research I found huge donations he had made to the Republican party and its programs. I also saw where after said donations were made, he got the "bid" rewarded to him on various government projects........ all of which were overseen by Republican control. Then I noticed something else. He had one business not in his name, but in the name of someone close to him. It had nothing to do with any of his other business' and he would have had as much use for it as a pig would for a silk hat.
It was a business located in Colombia, South America. Again I looked at the list of his "political donations". All top name Republicans. McCain included. So you will have to forgive me if I feel that we are being sold out and something is rotten in Denmark.
And my taxes are paying these leech private contracting companies such as KBR and Blackwater who are profiteering off 2 wars. Oil private companies such as Exxon who posted 45.2 billion dollar profit in 2009 but paid no income taxes while using our tax payers paid public lands, or how the private financial and auto companies bailed out using our tax payer money eh?
had-enough-470242: "Last time I checked, the unions and federal workers didn't force our country in to 2 deadend wars that is costing us 160 billion a year, gave huge tax breaks to the rich and corporations, gave outrageous salaries to CEOs, give out predatory subprime mortgage to americans, and outsourced American jobs overseas while still posting record profits."
I think you're a little confused. Federal workers (i.e. your illustrious government) had everything to do with your first 2 points, they enabled your 3rd and 4th points, and unions had everything to do with the last point.
My mistake. I forgot that you lumped police, teachers, firefighters, military, policiticans, government officials, congress, judicial officials all into one group.
Forwhatitsworth: Fair enough. Dig deep and you'll see that democrats are just as culpable when it comes to favors. Obama has GE and whoever is behnd the high speed rails and big pharma was one of his largest campaign contributors. Reid has casinos and chinese investments with turbines and the list goes on from both sides.
I have to ask how a 35 year old is worth fifty million and where he got said money for the massive donations? George Carlin hit the nail square on the head when he said to forget about voting or changing things since a handful of large corporations had controlled America since, like forever. If you read a little history you'll see where I'm coming from as regards both parties and special interests. Until campaign finance reform occurs (like when hell freezes over) we will continue to suffer as a result.
had-enough-470242... Don't let anyone change your mind. You're so close to the truth and I know that at least SOME of the posters on here know it and want you to shut up.
Hey! You want to make a hit at your next party? I've got a Blackwater tee-shirt I'll let you have cheap. I don't think I'll be needing it after what I've seen.
mygirl1.... You know the guy that is being held in Pakistan right now? Well this guy does similar things for people in dark places. His business' run themselves off of cheap labor and a few key people.
It was my past that got me invited along. I had wine at a dinner party at one of his mansions with a guy who had had lunch with the director of the CIA. They were drinking wine at $800 a bottle. Does that tell you anything?
Our country is in a world of "trouble", there is a storm coming and at my age I only fear for my children and grandchildren not for myself. The American dream has been bought and sold by people who hide behind our flag and profess to be patriots, when in truth it is all about $$$$$$$$$ and lots of it.
And the next American Revolution begins. Thank God for the true Americans that stand tall for everything this great nation has always been about. Not those that have worked so hard for so many years to corrupt the proud American spirit in the name of great power and wealth. But those with the blood coursing thru their veins of our wise forefathers and the brave men and women that have paid with their very lives to preserve this great nation for well over 200 years.
We are proud Americans, not the lazy wimps that some in our country believe us to be. We will not lie down beaten as many of our own political leaders and wealthy corportions sell this nation to the highest bidder. This land is our land. This great American experiment called the United States of America belongs to us. You may think that your swindles have worked. You may think you have divided and conquered the people thru the lies of your highly paid media. You are badly mistaken.
The people of Wisconsin have proven you wrong. The political leaders in Wisconsin that stand with the people have proven you wrong. You WILL correct all that you have soiled or the rest of the people in the entire country will rise against you. The time is now to restore the balance in this country. You can't have it all or most of it. The resources and hard work of the people in this country belong to all of us. You'll willingly give it back or we will take it back.
Forwhatitsworth: I was wrong, we're on the same page. See what deliberately created class and political divisions can do. So, how do we alter course? I try to look at both sides and do research and have become a conspiracy theorist as a result. It didn't start out like that, I was just curious but the more I read and looked into situations and events the more alarmed I became. Have you ever read Vonnegut's "God Bless You Mr. Rosewater?" If you have then you understand the 'money river' and what we have before us is the money river x ten.
mygirl1..... No I haven't read it, but I will make it a point to get a copy. I'm old enough to remember President Eisenhower making his last speech as he left office. I can still remember what my father said, (A die-hard Republican.) when I sat and watched the outgoing President I remember this nervous look on his face and in his eyes as he glanced around the room. He was speaking of the changes in our country with a standing army the size of which our country never had, and the pressures that were already, just 15 years after WWII had ended, being put on the political structure of our country.
I think if there was a turning point, that was it. My father served under Eisenhower in WWII. He said not to me, but to himself out loud, "I've never seen him so nervous?" Almost as if it were a question he was asking himself.
What I have seen and experienced is what some would refer to as "honor among thieves". Somewhere people started caring more for themselves and money, then they do for the life of our country and our country men. We have become so divided that we are easy to control. In the 1960's-70's there was a force that brought people together in a common goal. But the movement was attacked and destroyed by the introduction of drugs to many of the people involved in it. At that time in my life, I would have been against it. But now I look back and think that it was no accident that the drug culture was the thing that brought that movement down.
Fire the Wisconsin teachers who did not report to work! There are plenty of qualified people who need these jobs. These filthy pigs should kiss the ground that they walk on because it's NOT Egypt, not Bahrain, not Libya, not Lebanon, not Syria, and not Iran. Fire them now!
Forwhatitsworth: The 60's started out as anti-vietnam. My father was in the army and I remeber a lot of GI's coming back with some serious dope. I also recall that the draft was alive and well and how returning soldiers were treated.
Look into the Third Reich and how many nazis were funded by wealthy families on this side of the pond. The corruption goes back to the robber barons, the Rockefellers, Morgans, Standard Oil and many, many more of that ilk.
Derek: I'm a NJ homeowner, and I don't know what the hell you're talking about. Cut what public school budget? Christie or no Christie, when you live in a community controlled by Communists of the worst kind , there are no school budget cuts, and Gov. Christie can't do a freakin thing about that. I don't know what the hell you're talking about. You obviously don't live in a Communist town in NJ as I do. Fuggetabouit. I'm moving south where all the sensible people in NJ are going. Lost cause!
mygirl1.... I know all about Vietnam. From 1st hand experience. I also had a brother and 3 first cousins to go there. I cousin died from agent orange and agent yellow, one was crippled by a helicopter blade that was blown off by a mortar round and struck him. My brother suffers now from agent orange. My other cousin who was a USMC at Khasahn in 68' suffers from PTSD. Me? All I got during that time was a cut on my hand and a broken leg.
And I know about Prescott Bush and his ties to Hitlers war machine. The Bush family still has law suits pending against them for their part in operating a factory using Jewish slave labor to produce among other things, Zyclon B. It was a gas that was used to murder people in the extermination camps that the Nazi's ran.
I'd love to keep talking with you, but I have a farm to run, so I have to get up at 5:00am. I'll click on you to stay in touch. Take care.
"In response to a question of where she was, Sen. Lena Taylor sent a tweet saying she was "doing the people's business. Power to the PEOPLE.""
Run and hide and then claim you are doing your job and throw out an overplayed slogan to impress the easily impressed.... Just when you thought Dems couldn't sink any lower. What kind of adult runs away and hides? Must be nice to just disappear from your job and not be fired.
Fact: Wisconsin's was projected by their own accounting to have an overall budget surplus of one hundred and twenty million in 2012 (amazing considering the state of the economy Nation wide). Interesting that the Republican Governor pissed it all away in tax breaks for his corporate cronies (this was his first order of business after taking office). These tax breaks for the rich, multinationals and corporations totaled one hundred and thirty million (do the math). More importantly eliminating the American right of collective bargaining for Federal and state employees will effectively destroy and eliminate the Democratic Party's number one source of Champaign donations in any given year. This is not fiscal conservatism... this is politics! Fact: FOX News is lying on behalf of Corporate America!
big freakin deal, it is not as if party line has not walked out before during session. Grow up and deal with it. That is what you were elected to do.
As for the Democrat state senators, what were you thinking???? I personally would have loved to see how the Wisc Repulicans vote. Yes, it would have further solidify the elitists and the working class. The debate would have been comical, with new comedy lines every day.... serious late night and SNL material. It would have a been serious blow to the GOP in Wisconson in 2012.... Should have pushed the matter instead of delaying debate and vote on a dead bill. In my opinion, this bill is already dead. If Republicans actually vote for the Bill, then it is guaranteed that they will not have any blue collar support in their next election. No one is that stupid.... The one term Tea Party members is another case. So why represent your constituients?
This is very simple. You (A. Person). are not entitled to 100% benefits and pay funded by the taxpayers. The people that don't enjoy YOUR same right. Why should we in the private sector pay for something we can't have?
Unions, and particularly public employees unions have had way too much power for way too long. This is a great step in the right direction and a great place to start cutting the fat. Hopefully this will be highly contagious.
It was collapsed, even though 120 people agreed with me. I see others who I disagree with treated in the same manner. Why is this?
After reading all these comments about "other" unions, I am wondering why NO political group in power has even talked about just how HUGE & POWERFUL the police, firemans, and paramedic unions are??
What will they be forced to give up?? I live here in NY state and I was SHOCKED to learn that there are at least 7 LAYERS of Law Enforcement (local police, sheriffs, state police, City, county and state Marshalls, DEC, NCON, NYS Bureau of investigation, and god only know how many depts I have missed ALL being paid to do the same job as each other ONLY doing it by filing a different form with a different dept. How does this state justify that a MAJOR (rank) in ANY of these depts (ALL covered BY the PBA) should earn an annual salary of $174,000 (YES, that's a Hundred and seventy four THOUSAND dollars) as a salary NOT including ALL the PERKS of the job.
And the GREED of these people is simply nauseating. The RANKS above the rank of Captain ALL were asking for a $20K annual salary increase less than 2 months ago. Thank god, our NEW govenor told them where to stick it.
It is absolutely no wonder when considering the salarys that these people are paid for the amount of daily and annual work that each of them do, that this state is BEYOND broke!!!!
There is absolutely NO reason why we have to have 7 LAYERS of Police, Fire, and Paramedic protection. What happened to the world where I grew up in where you either had local police of the sherriffs for local protection and the STATE police took care of the STATE. That was friggin it.
1. 2, or 3 different police agencys protected this state until as late as the 60's. Then all heck broke loose, and someone figured out that since the taxpayers were paying the bill and they also thought the taxpayers were too stupid to realize it, they could just organize NEW agencys to cover everything from chasing down squirrels (park police) to mean spirited Meter Maids.
And when those same people who slipped all this crap past the taxpayers soon realized there was just not enough state revenue the normal way (federal taxes) to pay these people a NEW state income tax was instituted as well as the commanders looked the other way while their patrol officers ran rough shod over the citizendry by issuing rediculious tickets, violations, summons, with absolutely INSANE amounts of fines attached.
Never mind, this crap about SURCHARGES that the state now redularly attaches to virtually EVERY form of business conducted.
The system is seriously BROKEN because of ALL the "in-your face/what are YOU going to do about it" rampant GREED and CORRUPTION that the PEOPLE (YOU) are ALLOWING these HIRED GUNS to do to you.
And trust me people, the Law Enforcement people of this state will be the LAST folks I call in case of an emergency. I do not need too. I have designed my entire life to be self-sufficent and OFF-the-GRID right down to on site power generation and HIGH pressure water pumps to fight fires.
Learn to be self-sufficent and there will be absolutely no need for all this EXCESS Law Enforcement protection, fire protection/prevention, and even the most basic medical skills.
Does anyone here think for a moment that pioneers on the frontier 100 years ago called the fire department when there was a fire?? Heck no, they dealt with it them selves and did not cry to Social Services for financial support.
People had a SPINE back then. They were HEARTY, strong, PROUD to be American and did NOT complain.
What the hell has happened to my country I was born in, proud to serve, and as JFK said "ASK not what your country can do for you BUT what can you do for your country"
To me this basic tenant has fallen by the wayside as people have figured out that they only have to do the bare minimum to earn a UNEARNED hourly wage as dictated by the rules of a UNION contract!!!
What a despicable act by the Democrat Senators. Getting on a bus and leaving the State. It is a stunt. I think it was to allow some time to import more protesters in from other States. Obama's "Organize America" is now on scene. The DNC is involved. They are trying to swell the number of sign carriers and rabble rowsers to make it look like they have more support than they do. A de facto teachers strike. If they called in sick they should need a Doctors note, just like the kids do to excuse their absence. And Drug Test the Teachers too.......
25,000 out of a population of 5.4 million in the State. It's a small fraction.
Democrats are all for democracy when the vote will go their way....when the know it won't, they run away.......how Patriotic
This is very simple. You (A. Person). are not entitled to 100% benefits and pay funded by the taxpayers. The people that don't enjoy YOUR same right. Why should we in the private sector pay for something we can't have?
It's funny how you mentioned that. I wonder what % of walmart, McDonalds or other corporations that pay unlivable minimum wages are actually on public assistance such as food stamps, medicare, medicaid, etc? Corporations in the private industry that still rake in huge profits yet pay their employees peanuts. After all, the government will pick up the rest.
I know a few marines that were on food stamps because their pay was so low (E-1 to E-3). They also have free tricare for their healthcare. You think they don't deserve it too?
These Teacher Unions need to understand that they have to start paying into the system like everyone else, first it was they were angry because we wanted to stop paying for their Viagra and now "they" don't want to have to pay toward "their retirement and Health Care. They drug students to the protest and when ask the kids didn't even know why they were there.
Obama wants the unions it to help him with getting reelected, well so sorry Obama you can't BUY your way this time. You are on your way out we can no longer pay to support these Unions and all their request!!
Janie Ackerly.....I wonder if there is a Viagra-like pill that would help them perform better in the classroom ??? You saw the students on TV.....wandering in a daze, giggling, Yay, a day off from school....My teacher brought me here....to stop some guy from doing something
This sure is a heated topic. Almost 10,000 responces!
Having been in business since before 18, and not having EVER been able to collect a days worth of unemployment, nor anyone to cry to but myself regarding working conditions, pay and vacation the very idea of a Union makes me sick. I understand there are some people that require consistency, they would feel completely lost without a schedule or a "set" routine. All I can say is this, "It must be nice".
One time when I was very young I went to this party with friends. Turned out to be a real bad scene. Lot's of people doing drugs, many of them from the local factory (One of the big three). Anyway my car got stuck in a snow bank (Mustang 5.0) and I was somewhat forced to make friends with these people or freeze, besides there was no way I was going to push the car out myself. In making conversation with one of them who was wearing his Automotive UAW outfit I asked him "Just get off work?" and he said "Naw I'm on break". Considering the amount of drugs he had consumed I was a bit taken back and I asked him "You won't get in trouble going into work intoxicated"? He said to me "Naw, I have a union job, if someone reports me for being high the company has to pay to rehabilitate me, which is basically paid vacation time, after that I just get my job back."
At that time I owned my own business, was single, well dressed, 3 year old sports car and I thought to myself "How the hell do these manufatures survive!?". Now days I am married with children, only dress up when it matters, drive a 20 year old S Class and still own my own business.
I started my business with nothing and I still have most of it left.
Elsewhere, some Democrats applauded the developments in Wisconsin as a long-awaited sign that their party was fighting back against the Republican wave created by November's midterm election.
Oh, so the DEMOCRATS don’t like what the PEOPLE voted for in November? They just walk out and don’t want to do business? WHO is the party of NO???? Maybe we should send them all to Egypt!
Hi DBAkron - good comments. I live in West Central Ohio and our local school system is a prime example of why these bills are necessary. The local city school spends 80% of the yearly budget on wage and benefits for employees. There have been multiple tax levies placed on our local property taxes. A recent levy went down, but then someone, "magically" found the votes needed to make it pass. Our county has had some of the highest Unemployment in the State of Ohio, many months over 13%. The city is deeply divided and since then has made a renewal levy fail. Since 2006 I have lost 16.5% of my wages due to the downturn, yet, until last year, the school employees continued to receive COL raises each year. A request was brought forth to reduce their wages by 2% to balance the budget. You think they were trying to kill the teachers! We cannot have any reduction in pay due to the contract. The Unions have all along, created a propaganda program to insist that "the kids will suffer" if all their demands are not met. Well, the school programs are already suffering since 80% of the money goes to Teacher salaries. (BTW, it has already been shown that the school system is heavy on support staff, without due cause.) The average Teacher in our Dist has a base pay in excess of $50000. I, as a Controller for a small local company, makes much less than the Teachers. (I also have a Master's as well.) The private sector has had to adjust to keep themselves in business, yet, the Unions is keeping their rank and file from joining us. That is wrong. It is greedy and irresponsible. I am so sick of the Unions destroying our country. They are not better than the private sector, nor are the Academically better either. They should not receive more than the private sector or more than the budget can afford.
Mike, The kids looked like they were having a high old time laughing and giggling, they just don't know why, guess it was because they weren't in class being "taught" I think what I find really irritating is the fact some of these unions feel we should take care of them the rest of their lives. These teachers are getting more and more benefits and doing less,our schools are declining and kids are learning less and less.
Every time I hear another republican complaining about union workers being overpaid my jaw hits the floor. Over the last 30 years, the salaries of the wealthy CEOs and high-level management has skyrocketed while the salaries of just about everyone else has DECREASED in inflation-adjusted dollars.
You want to know who is overpaid? The wealthy. Explain to me how a police officer that puts his life on the line every day to protect the rest of us is overpaid but the CEOs of health insurance companies somehow deserve to be paid tens of millions of dollars a year for canceling the insurance policies of cancer patients. Explain to me how a teacher that spends 7 hours a day dealing with a ROOMFUL of kids and spends her evenings preparing lesson plans for the next day is overpaid but the multi-millionaires on Wall Street somehow deserve their salaries when they do little for society except fatten their own wallets?
Finally, explain to me how a company somehow deserves to have the same rights as a person but a union does not.
Wake up, folks. This has nothing to do with solving any financial crises in Wisconsin. This is simply a group of republicans trying to union-bust because unions tend to support democrats. It's plain old selfish politics.
Being in a 100% taxpayer funded benefit plan does not preclude you fromfood stamps, if you qualify.
And if one does't feel that they are earning enough, or being treated fair....Find another job. If you are on food stamps, you probably qualify for taxpayer funded education opportunities which can lead to bettering your lifestyle, higher pay etc.
I'm not totally on board with comparing the state workers of Wis. 100% tax payer funded pensions (401K) for life, and 100% paid health insurance to those employees and their benefits of Wal-Mart. And I will assume that the average worker at Wal-mart is in the 48% of Americans that don't pay any federal taxes. Therefore, are not funding the retirements of state workers in Wis, and their health-care.
To me this is not about comparing CEO pay with Union pay as you suggest. It is about me, an non-CEO in the upper 52% of people that pay all the taxes, funding a retirement (100%) and health-care (100%) of state officials.
Those workers do not pay into their pensions, the tax payers fund it. The state of Wis. is hurting financially. I am on the side of "I don't want my taxes raised continually in order to balance budgets." And I don't want to pay for other people retirement plans. In the 70's US corporations had pension program for non-union people. The were replaced by 401K matching programs. To me it is time to match what the average private employee has with what the states are offering.
The costs that the unions have are not in pay, but benefits. Increase their pay, and mirror good, quality public company benefits.
MGIN, I don't think this is so much "all" unions but more about the refusal to negotiate. This one won't even agree to Contribute toward their retirement or pension. My husband was in the Carpenters Union we had to pay toward his Pension and Health Care, and if we wanted to continue the Health Care after he retired we still pay toward that. I don't thing the American Tax Payer should pay for everything , the members of unions should have to contribute like everyone else. I also think the Government workers should pay in as well. We are going bankrupt fast!!
A full summary of the Governor's budget repair bill is below.
Fiscal Year 2010-11 Budget Adjustment Bill Items
Employee Compensation:
Pension contributions: Currently, state, school district and municipal employees that are members of the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) generally pay little or nothing toward their pensions. The bill would require that employees of WRS employers, and the City and County of Milwaukee contribute 50 percent of the annual pension payment. The payment amount for WRS employees is estimated to be 5.8 percent of salary in 2011.
Health insurance contributions: Currently, state employees on average pay approximately 6 percent of annual health insurance premiums. This bill will require that state employees pay at least 12.6 percent of the average cost of annual premiums. In addition, the bill would require changes to the plan design necessary to reduce current premiums by 5 percent. Local employers participating in the Public Employers Group Health insurance would be prohibited from paying more than 88 percent of the lowest cost plan. The bill would also authorize the Department of Employee Trust Funds to use $28 million of excess balances in reserve accounts for health insurance and pharmacy benefits to reduce health insurance premium costs.
Health insurance cost containment strategies: The bill directs the Department of Employee Trust Funds and the Group Insurance Board to implement health risk assessments and similar programs aimed at participant wellness, collect certain data related to assessing health care provider quality and effectiveness, and verify the status of dependents participating in the state health insurance program. In addition, it modifies the membership of the Group Insurance Board to require that the representative of the Attorney General be an attorney to ensure the board has access to legal advice among its membership.
Pension changes for elected officials and appointees: The bill modifies the pension calculation for elected officials and appointees to be the same as general occupation employees and teachers. Current law requires these positions to pay more and receive a different multiplier for pension calculation than general classification employees. Under the state constitution, this change will be effective for elected officials at the beginning of their next term of office.
Modifications to Wisconsin Retirement System and state health insurance plans: The bill directs the Department of Administration, Office of State Employment Relations and Department of Employee Trust Funds to study and report on possible changes to the Wisconsin Retirement System, including defined contribution plans and longer vesting periods. The three agencies must also study and report on changes to the current state health insurance plans, including health insurance purchasing exchanges, larger purchasing pools, and high-deductible insurance options.
General fund impact – Authorize the Department of Administration Secretary to lapse or transfer from GPR and PR appropriations (excluding PR appropriations to the University of Wisconsin) to the general fund estimated savings of approximately $30 million from implementing these provisions for state employees in the current fiscal year (2010-11). Segregated funds would retain any savings from these measures.
State and Local Government and School District Labor Relations:
Collective bargaining – The bill would make various changes to limit collective bargaining for most public employees to wages. Total wage increases could not exceed a cap based on the consumer price index (CPI) unless approved by referendum. Contracts would be limited to one year and wages would be frozen until the new contract is settled. Collective bargaining units are required to take annual votes to maintain certification as a union. Employers would be prohibited from collecting union dues and members of collective bargaining units would not be required to pay dues. These changes take effect upon the expiration of existing contracts. Local law enforcement and fire employees, and state troopers and inspectors would be exempt from these changes.
Career executive transfers – The bill would allow state employees in the career executive positions to be reassigned between agencies upon agreement of agency heads.
Limited term employees (LTE) – The bill would prohibit LTE's from being eligible for health insurance or participation in the Wisconsin Retirement System.
State employee absences and other work actions – If the Governor has declared a state of emergency, the bill authorizes appointing authorities to terminate any employees that are absent for three days without approval of the employer or any employees that participate in an organized action to stop or slow work.
Quality Health Care Authority – The bill repeals the authority of home health care workers under the Medicaid program to collectively bargain.
Child care labor relations – The bill repeals the authority of family child care workers to collectively bargain with the State.
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics (UWHC) Board and Authority – The bill repeals collective bargaining for UWHC employees. State positions currently employed by the UWHC Board are eliminated and the incumbents are transferred to the UWHC Authority.
University of Wisconsin faculty and academic staff - The bill repeals the authority of UW faculty and academic staff to collectively bargain.
Debt Restructuring – The bill authorizes the restructuring of principal payments in fiscal year 2010-11 on the state's general obligation bonds. These principal repayments will be paid in future years. Since the state is required to make debt service payments by March 15th, the bill must be enacted by February 25th to allow time to sell the refinancing bonds. This provision will reduce debt service costs by $165 million in fiscal year 2010-11. This savings will help address one‑time costs to comply with the Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund state Supreme Court decision and make payments under the Minnesota‑Wisconsin tax reciprocity program.
Medicaid
Address FY11 Medicaid deficit – Medicaid costs are expected to exceed current GPR appropriations by $153 million. The bill would increase the Medicaid GPR appropriation to address this shortfall.
Authorize DHS to restructure program notwithstanding current law – Medicaid costs have increased dramatically due to the recession and expanded program eligibility. In order to reduce the growth in costs, the bill authorizes the Department of Health Services to make program changes notwithstanding limits in state law related to specific program provisions. The department is expected to develop new approaches on program benefits, eligibility determination and provider cost-effectiveness. The proposed changes will require passive approval of the Joint Committee on Finance before implementation.
Technical correction – Act 28 included language that required unused GPR expenditure authority in the Medicaid GPR appropriation at the end of the biennium to be carried over to the subsequent biennium. The bill repeals this provision in order to ensure unspent funds in Medicaid lapse to the general fund balance.
Aging and Disability Resource Centers (ADRC) – The bill transfers an estimated $3 million in savings in this appropriation to Medicaid. ADRC's are the intake and assessment element of the state's Family Care program.
Corrections – The bill provides $22 million GPR to address shortfalls in the Department of Corrections adult institutions appropriation. These shortfalls are due to health care costs, overtime, and reductions in salary and fringe benefit budgets under Act 28.
Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Funding for Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) – The bill allocates $37 million of excess TANF revenues to increase TANF funding for the EITC from $6.6 million to $43.6 million in fiscal year 2010-11. By increasing TANF funding, GPR funding for the EITC is reduced by a commensurate amount.
Income Augmentation Revenues – Allow the Department of Children and Families and Department of Health Services to utilize $6.5 million of already identified income augmentation revenues to meet fiscal year 2010-11 lapse requirements.
Act 28 Required Lapses by DOA Secretary – Under Act 28, the Department of Administration Secretary is required to lapse or transfer a total of $680 million in 2009-11 from appropriations made to executive branch agencies to the general fund. The bill would reduce this amount by $79 million to ensure the lapses can be met in the next five months as this was ineffectively addressed by the previous administration.
Lapse of Funding from Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) Appropriation – The JCF appropriation includes $4.5 million related to estimated fiscal year 2010-11 implementation costs of 2009 Wisconsin Act 100 (operating while intoxicated enforcement changes). This funding is not anticipated to be needed in fiscal year 2010-11 and the bill lapses these amounts to the general fund balance.
Sale of State Heating Plants – The bill authorizes the Department of Administration to sell state heating plants. The proceeds from any sale, net of remaining debt service, would be deposited in the budget stabilization fund.
Shift Key Cabinet Agency Positions to Unclassified Status – The bill creates unclassified positions for chief legal counsel, public information officer and legislative liaison activities in cabinet agencies. An equivalent number of classified positions are deleted to offset the new unclassified positions. These activities are critical to each cabinet agency's overall mission and should have direct accountability to the agency head.
ok i have read this, and see nothing at all unreasonable..... outside of teachers, and unions using kids to "stop some dude from doing something" kids have no reason to be there if 1 they have no idea wtf is going on because these so said teachers, cant even teach them the name of the governor, a free get out of class pass to do something they have no clue as to what they are doing? these people want US to pay for there raises, not to mention show support? get a life you union scumbags, shame on you for bringing airheads to a debate that have NO CLUE as to what the debate is about, much less lacking the smarts to comprehend what the word debate means. shame on the democraps for running like little kids to pout rather than debate this in the open.....
oh, and if you union anti political republicans want to cry about where's the cut to elected officials? read it again, they are in there with the rest of the group. so cry foul all you want to, the democraps in this case ar trying to save the $$ going into their own pockets!
Who ever is managing this site, I have one question. This is supposed to be a site where people can come and state their idea's. It does not mean that if ones ideas does not meat the approval of the masses that this persons statement should be collapsed. And for you group members who are doing this, shame on you, you wish to be heard, so why is it that you can not let others be too. I do understand shutting down racist, stupid, or outright hateful statements, but to shut down people's views just because they do not agree with yours or the groups is wrong.
And to add to my statement. Why is it that the people that have the most people agreeing with them are the ones that are shut down. Although I see both sides have been shut down, mostly I see anti-union sides shut down. This is becoming nothing more then censorship and needs to be stopped.
guess once the public sector falls, private sector will to. i'm going to design a card board box that will accomidate a family of four. anybody want to buy one while you have some cash. you can get it real cheap right now before inflation shows up, or demand increases.
pardon my ignorance, i have almost no personal experience with unions, we don't have a lot of unions in Tennessee, but it seems whenever they strike in our area, they were already making much more than the average, so there arguments seem petty compared to what others are facing. as for the democrats walking out, my first thought was YEA! But i admit it does not reflect well on them. However, too often it seems the biggest problem with our two party system is the teeter-totter, back and forth, where 51% thinks they have the absolute power to overrun the will of the other 49%. Not that i believe any other system is better, i just think we tend to confuse voting with hero worship, and immediately after being elected our "public servants" become drunk with power and forget "their place". i just read an article by an adomant republican activist in our state calling for the impeachment of our newly elected republican governor because immediately after election his first act was to change disclosure laws that would force him to disclose sources of income, etc. blah, blah, blah. My point is we should all put aside our insane devotion to partisan politics and work together to dig ourselves out of the mess created by the crooks on both sides of the aisle, which WE elected by the way, so we must all share the blame and responsibility. Finally, i don't believe there is that much difference between unions and government, both are little more than necessary evils, drunk with money and power, prone to corruption, and yet ELECTED BY US! Jimmy Carter (i know, you hate him) once said in a debate with Ronald (i forgot) Reagan (i know, you worship him), that there are no simple solutions to complicated problems (paraphrased), and never has that been more true than now. I like John Lennon's attitude, "i tell them there's no problems, only solutions". May we find peace and unity, and if we must fight, let us fight against the corruption that is enslaving us and destroying this great country. "Give me your money, send me to Washington, and I will solve all your problems" quote (insert crook of choice here).
No unions and the corporate oligarchy that it promises, or we embrace unions and the excessive, mafia like operation that it represents.
And we, with a straight face, want to export this wonderful lifestyle to other countries? Are we serious?
Personally I wish for some calamity to strike that is so horrible that it changes the way we look at life. Unfortunately thats what it will take. The world is consumed by greed. We think we have it bad here when in other countries they just walk into your house, shoot you, and take all of your possessions in the name of the state.
Bring on the aliens! I would rather my children get vaporized by heat beams then have them be slaves to the elite cabal of powerbrokers.
Your child just might be the person who carries Paris Hilton's dogs poop bag!
by the way, i own my own business, and work a second job (thanks to the housing market collapse), pay my taxes, and have never taken unemployment, food stamps or any other form of government assistance, and though i may lean democratic, i wouldn't pee on either party if they were on fire in their current form. now, let the hate begin.
To those who are wondering why law enforcement and firefighters were left out of the bill, it is because SOME of these local departments backed Gov. Walker in the election. Over the past years Wisconsin public employees have taken pay freezes and contributed more the insurance and pension, but this is not what they are protesting for, they are protesting for their collective bargaining rights which is what the bill aims to take away. Check out the definition of collective bargaining to see that it involves way more than wages and benefits. Walker says ending collective bargaining is part of the budget fix but collective bargaining has nothing whatsoever to do with balancing the budget especially since Wisconsin actually has a surplus in it's budget. This is union busting plain and simple plus a little favoritism thrown in for good measure to the groups that supported the governor (however, these departments can now be seen protesting in Madison for the sake of their fellow workers). If this bill pases and if you believe in trickle down, then this will trickle down to all unions and then to everyone in the private sector. The benefits that the private sector enjoys, 40 hour weeks, 401K's, vacation, safe working conditions, etc., were courtesy of the union's fights and once these rights are taken away from union members there's no stopping it being taken away from the private sector. So for those of you who think unions are no longer necessary, think again. And no, I do not belong to a union, I just live in Wisconsin and have the common sense to see this for what it is. As for the democrat senators that left the state, thank you for standing up for the people that voted you in. You are the voice of your electors, even though you are not in the big building in Madison, you are still doing the job you were electred for are being paid for.
I really wish people would bother to do the Research as to the History of the US Labor Unions.
1. The US Labor Unions of the Henry Ford Era were wiped out by the 1929-1939 Great Depression.
2. Prior to World War II, President FDR Suspended All US Labor Union Activities. During that time it was thought that the US Labor Unions were part of the "Italian Organized Crime". In retrospect he was right. As the US Labor Unions were Organized by the "Italian Organized Crime" gone legit (many of the Italian Godfathers did not want to get into other "Businesses" like Drugs and Prostitution (easier to get caught).). The "Italian Organized Crime" also started the US Insurance Corporations, like Arsonist "Tommy the Torch" selling "Business Insurance". Most of the "Italian Organized Crime" believed in what Mussolini and ally Hitler were doing, since Germany and Italy got out of the Global Great Depression (people literally dying from starvation) years before the US.
3. Prior to WWII President FDR also Nationalized all US Industry. While the US was shipping US Military "War Materials" to England before getting into the War At Europe (an Act of War). England was at War with Germany since 1939, and had set backs (loss of lots of Military Equipment) like loss at Dunkirk.
4. After the US entered the War At Europe, the US War Department conducted a Study to prevent the catastrophic accidents at the US Ammunition Plants/Factories. The Study strongly recommended a decrease in the work week to 40 hours per week, a certain amount of sleep, safety procedures, numbers of fire extinguishers, a fire department, etc.. Since US Industry was Nationalized by President FDR, this became Standard for all US Industry. It was NOT the later (after WWII) nor previous US Labor Unions that did this as they claim (propaganda). Later other concessions were made like getting the day off for Religious Worship (Sunday). The Jews demanded Friday and Saturday off for Religious Worship and received Saturday. Eventually this resulted in Saturday and Sunday off from work. Eventually, even concessions were made to make all wages equal at all the US Nationalized Industry (including for Women) this became the later Federal Minimum Wage (again not because of the US Labor Unions, as their Activities were Suspended by President FDR). You can get a copy of the US War Department Study (above) under the FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act), like I did (if I were at home not here (Afghanistan), where my copy is, I could give you the entire title, date, etc.).
5. During the US Military Invasion (Liberation, depending on your viewpoint) of Sicily, and Italy, the "Italian Organized Crime" (still believed in what Mussolini was doing) demanded and organized the US Labor Unions to strike to slow down the US Military Invasion of Sicily and Italy. President FDR states a National Emergency and orders the US Military Police (not National Guard) to stop the Strikes, with Deadly Force Authorized, resulting in the US Military Police machinegunning US Labor Union Strikers that got violent (deadly). Reference BBC Documentary. While living (stationed) at Germany and Italy while writing my Research Papers for Post Graduate Degrees I interviewed many survivors of WWII (that were young adults ("teens were considered as adults back then, as in their Military) during WWII, to get an idea of what happened at Germany and Italy). The Study of Military History/Science/Politics is job related as a US Military Officer.). Much to the displeasure of the College Professors my Research Papers were written like a Cornelius Ryan (I like his books and style of writing) Novel (including the detailed research, hundreds of pages just in the appendices.).
6. After WWII the President FDR Suspension of US Labor Union Activities was lifted. During this time the "Italian Organized Crime" took over the US Labor Unions in Full Force (financial backing, "muscle", organization based on the Italian equivalent of the National Socialist German Workers Party and "brown shirt" tactics, etc.). This has been chronicled by movies and books like F.I.S.T (1978), On the Water Front (1954), Last Exit to Brooklyn (1989), TV mini series American Justice: Target - Mafia (1993)(Jimmy Hoffa), Jimmy Hoffa (aka Hoffa)(1992), etc.. The US Labor Unions became a lucrative legitimate business for the "Italian Organized Crime", just like they started Las Vegas (eventually caught by the US Government for Tax Evasion, so the US Government ended up owning Las Vegas, including the "Houses of Ill Repute". Eventually everything was "contracted" out or sold to private corporations. Hint: "What happens in Vegas" does not stay in Vegas.). The US Labor Unions take the previous names (pre Great Depression, pre WWII) of US Labor Unions for Public sentiment, popularity and familiarity (smart move).
Back in the day. When I was assigned to US Military Training With Industry (TWI) at Detroit with a certain US Automaker. The car I was drove ended up with four flat tires (sliced), a broken windshield, and torched. I had driven the wrong brand of car into the parking lot (Ford parked at GM). What was really not so smart was that: 1. the car was a Rental, 2. Being a US Military Officer am a US Government (Federal) Employee. The Rental Agency started to put pressure on the UAW to turn over those responsible since they Lease vehicles from Ford, GM, Chrysler. Being a Federal Employee it is the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) that investigates the crimes committed. Eventually, those that did the crimes (fear as terrorism) were turned over by the UAW, and they testified that they were just following UAW Orders.
By the way I already stated in other Newsvine Forums (Topics) the Solution to Fix/Repair the Broken US Education System based on my firsthand experience with the Public, Private and International Education Systems. I will not restate it here, this post is too long, and I have to lead my men and women of my US Military Asymmetric Mountain Warfare Command Team plus one Support Team to the next location (commanders (US Military Officers) lead from the front, basic leadership 101).
One last thing, research who "Mr. Corporate America" is. (Hint he is NOT a Repugnant, think former Senator from Delaware, Delaware Incorporation Laws, especially "Wall Street" as his major unlimited corporate campaign contributors and constituents.).
These union workers are behaving very badly and are obviously ungrateful for the generous pay and benefits they get now!
The small amount the bill would have them contribute to their own benefits is nothing compared with what private sector employees have to contend with.
Now If it is Ok for POTUS to Freeze Pay on hard working Civil servants who are not millionares by any stretch of the imagination most of the GS pool are made up of GS-7 thru 12. Which anyone can look up thier pay (it's not allot) as I looked at it as an alterative for serving my country upon the end of the war or incase I was ever wounded and could no longer serve in uniform. They are a hiring freeze and are locked in at what they are currently making now. Potus and SECDEF came to this idea to freeze pay and promotions as a way to help the economy. Which the Civil servants who are Union to an extent never protested, walked out or quit because of the situation. They stood fast and are working with what they are given. My buddy as GS-11 makes 55K with locality pay his wife doesnt work as she is raising thier youngest and they are living paycheck to paycheck and now that it is tax season he is getting hammered because he pays less for healthcare.... 20% tax braket. He and many other within the federal government are willing to take on the chin.
When you think of rich Government servants think of those in washington Congress and the senate. I am sure they are doing just fine on thier pay and other entitlments.
So when it comes to a state I dont see the problem... They need to suck it up and look at the greater good. Their is to much selfishness and not enough working together. I though the dems were all about Working together and not being selfish. I thought that this was the party of sacrificeing for the person under them. They need to think of the greater good and get with the program. Maybe the Unions should not put so much money behing political canidates and keep a savings foralternate compensation for their members.
If the Federal Government can do it the unions can to. Ya Im sure they whine to each other at work but they don't walk out and leave business (inthis case kids) hung out to dry. No wonder our kids education sucks compared to other nations. No wonder a majority of scientist, engineers and mathmaticians are from other countries. Teaching is not rocket scinence as they only teach to the state standards just enough to get thier students by. SAD! When my son starts school next year our oldest will be at a private school one where a teacher is more than a daycare provider.
By whom were those numbers projected by. I live in Wisconsin the "surplus" you're talking about doesn't exist. Not to mention, the Republican governor you're talking about has only been governor for all of 1 month. The Wisconsin State Senate hasn't even approved a budget yet and you're claiming Governor Walker's pissed all of our money away. I don't know what state you actually live in or where you get your sources, but having seen the goings on here first hand, I can tell you that you are way off on your facts.
collective bargaining rights also fall under these allotments, i call them allotments because you need to be special to get these....
if you neglect in your functioning role as an employee, you get time off 99.9% of the time with pay. you have the right to have your case heard before the union, as well the entity that has you employed, and thus IF the union doesnt feel there is good enough reason for you to be let go, ie. lack of effort at work, in subordination, misconduct, and so on, then your job is reinstated, with pay if by some remote chance you were denied pay. so for example: some teacher is caught having some type of relations with a student, we usually hear in most cases "suspended with pay till further review". that review is not based on guilt or innocence for some time, then you are still getting paid, even tho you are guilty as sin. hence be the case you have been found NOT to have been in such a violation, you are reinstated. This bill takes away the pay while suspended period. it takes away the power of elected officials of any sort to vote themselves in a raise, thus such a raise will be done with a vote for them in that district, ensuring they are doing their jobs. this also falls in the line with teachers, and other government workers.
The reason being police, firefighters, and emergency responders , are NOT included is, for the simple reason for an example: even if a police shooting an armed robber, who is even at the time shooting at him, and has full right to shoot this person in self defence, for hi safety, and others in the immediate area, he is put on administrative leave, mandatory. during that time the shooting is 1 being confirmed that the officer was in the right, 2 he also see's a therapist due to the emotional stress involved, be there is any and until an evaluation has been completed with satisfaction for he/she to return to work, armed, as an officer, and in his/her full mental capacity, so that there will be the issued sence that an armed person of the law, doesnt snap, and go on a killing spree, and is able to still defend himself, as well innocent victims, without the loss of more life if possible. so for those reasons, and this is as well in some relevance to firefighters and emergency responders of any type there maybe question to the ability to perform in the line of duty pending a traumatic event, or other. i personally am sick of hearing about teachers, and other government workers getting paid because they are suspended for a major infraction. when we hear about it we know this person is going to be fired, but by all means lets drag it out, and pay the person to boot. do you think this person pays the $ back? nope. they are entitled to that $ because the bargainingrights said they are. there's more, but for those who dont know, i suggest looking into what it does entail, and ask yourself, should the people be getting paid for derelictionof duty, as well other things the private sector wouldnt have a shot in heck at? yes do look into it, and you will see how absurd some of the collective bargaining rights are.
I have never worked for a union job and never would. Unlike some, I have skill and don't need representation. As for overtime, doubletime, holiday pay, every job I have worked in the last 40 years payed it all.
I know a lot of businesses in Oregon that pay more in wages and benefits than union jobs because it is worth it to keep unions out.
Repubs whine when they do not get their way. What a hypocritical bunch of sore losers. The Dems that left the building were doing their job supporting their constituents' wishes. They WERE doing the job they were paid to do! The immature governor was mad because he learned REAL QUICK that he can't bully people around like somebody told him he would be able to do if he got to be king, er I mean governor. I guess when the Repugs were all saying 'NO' in lock-step last year that was mature behavior? Uh-huh.... riiiiiight.....
Hey Gov. Walker! You got an angry mob outside your door. Whatcha gonna tell them? Or are you even gonna talk to them? And if you do talk are you gonna do it yourself or 'have it done'. He's got a LOT to learn about people. Better start looking for another job. They act like they are gonna make you resign.... or squeal like a pig. Or both.
So the responsibility of the State Senators is not to participate in the governing process, but rather to cut and run out and hold their breath when politics work against there agenda
Their pay should be stopped, their insurance should be cancelled and they should receive no credit for service towards a pension for as long as this charade continues.
They were paid to govern not run and hide like little girls on a schoolyard
This walkout thing seems to be democrats way of "if you don't play our way, we'll take the ball and leave." They did the same thing in Texas in 2003. Cry babies, spoiled little children. If the republicans ever did something like that the babies would still be whining about it.
The loophole was left in the law and they used it. I think it was very clever. They used what they had at their disposal to get the job done. All the while the Rs cry (cry=operative word) foul, but no law has been broken.
I also find it very ironic that the WI repubs are asking for President Obama's help to force Democrats to return to the state legislature.
All they really want is for Governor Walker to sit with them to work out a compromise for this issue.
I also find it hypocritical to think that Republicans would not pull this same stunt given the same set of circumstances. Especially given that we watched them say NO repeatedly last year, vote after vote after vote..... At least the Dems plan is based in common sense and within the law.
Bosslimo: "So, if we own a company, we have our rights, if we work for a company, we are to be slaves to them.... got it."
If that's how you feel then, don't go to work for a company. No job is a right, just as owning a company is not a right.
My appologies for construeing the context. By using the word "right" I have misled my intent. Please replace the word "right" with the word contract. A legal document agreed to by both parties involved. That will put into perspective my intended message.
Bob @ 1.199.....LOL, I had to respond to your message.
You show the value of the unions to the private sector, even as you think you are trashing them (unions). LOL
"I know a lot of businesses in Oregon that pay more in wage and benefits than union jobs because it is worth to keep unions out"......
Imagine that .... LOL the private sector employees are benefitting off the back of union workers/public sector employees union dues /representation.
These private employers are so concerned about having their employees unionize and have collective bargining etc, to where they would sooner or rather pay their private employees more to prevent this from happening. LOL
And you all are so ungrateful for this, and do not want to recognize what the unions have done to make your lives and workplace better, that you trash the unions at every hand, probably thinking that it is through your own efforts that you get the pay and benefits that you do get now.
Some of you guys need to get over your sense of self importance and belief that you are that important to a company that they cannot find another person to do your job and maybe at a cheaper rate and realize that without the unions you would not be able to bargain with these private employers for anything they did not want to give to you as salary or benefits package.
The private sector could treat you anyway they chose and there would be no one for you to appeal to, because there would be no govt agency formed where you as a private employee could file a greviance or complaint.
So it would seem that even without your direct input or representation by the unions you are receiving benefits from /off their (unions and union members) backs.
By the way I have worked in the private sector with no union represention, then the public sector with union represention , then the private sector where there was no union representation again.
So I am aware of how employees even licensed professionals are treated in both settings.
To other folks blaming the teachers for their childrens poor performance....
It is time that parents take responsibility for their children and their childrens' behaviour instead of expecting teachers to work miracles, to somehow make your children, who are so lacking in discipline and manners, learn and succeed. It is time to lead by example, place behaviour limits on your children, check homework etc.
When a child attend private school the parents expect their child/ren to learn because they are paying out mega bucks, so they put in the effort in their child/rens life and not allow these children to do whatever they chose with so much money on the line.
I, like my siblings attended private school because that was what was available at that time, and knew what my/our parents expected from me/us. Believe me .... discipline started at home. LOL
Comparing the economy to a bus ride he said the following “We can’t have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don’t mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.” Oct 25, Woonsocket RI, My Hometown
Congratulatiolns on your "win". Remember when they start to demand 70 hour work weeks, no paid holidays, and generally the "saping" of the workers benefits. Not only, state and city employees but especially when the Corporations start taking and lowering YOUR benefits and wages. REMEMBER that you thought it was a GREAT "win" today; it was for you because no one cut your waqes and benefits TODAY! Perhaps you are right in looking at it as a win. But, I will assure you, the time will come when ALL of the workers of the USA will feel the heel of oppression form big corporations and the politicians. They will NOT stop with just the unions Next will come lowering all wages, even the minimum wage. You think it just the union member but when did anyone stop when they could get more savings and profit by taking from someone else. But for today, again, congratulations. I hope you will like what lies down the road for YOU! By the way, I'm no lib, but I am also no benign idiot either. I am retired and maybe should just keep my big mouth shut, I don't have a "dog" in this fight anymore!
You may think you "won", but you'll realize your loss when your education system fails and your poorly educated children are in charge of your state in 20 years. Good luck with that.
I'm constantly amazed by people who want to screw over education. Don't you realize these children are the ones who will be taking care of you in your old age?
Congratulatiolns on your "win". Remember when they start to demand 70 hour work weeks, no paid holidays, and generally the "saping" of the workers benefits. Not only, state and city employees but especially when the Corporations start taking and lowering YOUR benefits and wages. REMEMBER that you thought it was a GREAT "win" today; it was for you because no one cut your waqes and benefits TODAY! Perhaps you are right in looking at it as a win. But, I will assure you, the time will come when ALL of the workers of the USA will feel the heel of oppression form big corporations and the politicians. They will NOT stop with just the unions Next will come lowering all wages, even the minimum wage. You think it just the union member but when did anyone stop when they could get more savings and profit by taking from someone else. But for today, again, congratulations. I hope you will like what lies down the road for YOU! By the way, I'm no lib, but I am also no benign idiot either. I am retired and maybe should just keep my big mouth shut, I don't have a "dog" in this fight anymore!
Freaking awesome post. Someone who gets it. Why do private sector employees, after years of getting screwed by their companies, seem intent on tearing public sector employees down rather than asking their private sector firms for better benefits during the MOST PROFITABLE CORPORATE YEAR ON RECORD!
But, what America needs to understand, is that most of world is producing products similar to most of ours at pennies on the dollar, and unless we lower our wages, benefits, regulation expenses, and taxes across our entire economy, we will never be competitive in a world economy
so you cheer the race to the bottom and think that American's should work for slave wages like they do in Malaysia just so that the CEO's of our former-corporations (let's be honest, these aren't "American companies" anymore) can make millions or even billions...
FUnny how Waterdog cited dems "rewriting the facts" when it was a blatant conservative that started this post. Typical repub sitting on a comeback, only to use it at the most innappropriate moment.
"when" the education system fails, It has already failed. Time to pull the plug on public education. It isn't education. Just compare our "graduates" with those from many other nations. No wonder we are falling behind.
You may think you "won", but you'll realize your loss when your education system fails
As liberals have pointed out countless times on newsvine, our education system IS failing and we're way behind other countries. All of this happened under Unions. They obviously were just out for bigger salararies and not better education. If not, they performed poorly at their job and need to be replaced.
It's all over the media outlets on how many states are going broke. If people still don't know this, our education system has failed us in the biggest way by teaching students to ignore data like this if it doesn't come from a specific party.
Hawklady: You are not quoting the President, but a letter from an irate constituent - check the source you included. The President was referring to being in a family car - families ride shotgun, lobbyists sit in the back.
Breaking the unions is first on the neo-conservative agenda (it's not really Goldwater or Reagan conservatism - its some twisted version that advocates a system to pool all the wealth of America into a few families). Their goal is a plutocracy in America, not a democracy. In power, they will set up a new feudalism where only the very rich have any power- all others will simply serve them. And if you refuse, you'll live in abject poverty. Do you really think these people care about you? Get a clue. If you aren't part of their royal circle - you're a nobody. The no-nothing Tea-partiers are their pawns. If this was 1776, these plutocrats would be the ones running to the King of England to turn in the revolutionaries.
You actually think that politics is a football game?! What a strange little man you are. Let me tell you what will happen next. The next election cycle, Wisconsin will be a Democratic state and then this vote will be overturned. Walker is a fool. All that he has done is make people angry. What he should have done is gone to the Unions and begged for consessions.
please raise your Liberal Blinders long enough to understand....If the cost of living is reduced by the same percentage as wages and benefits, your lifestyle will not change, except that now our product will be viable in a world economy and jobs will stop going overseas
and you need to take off your reality blinders and realize that the cost of living here WILL NOT BE REDUCED when/if our wages become commensurate with those of slave laborers in Malaysia. When Ford moved production to Mexico saving millions (possibly billions) in labor costs, did the price of a focus go down? No, they continued to go up.
When companies go overseas, they don't lower the costs of their goods here. They milk it and charge up full price (or even more) than before for added profits. The price goes up, wages go down, and CEO profits/bonuses soar soar soar!
If I thought the price of food and gas would come down as our wages and benefits erode, you'd have a point. But no one seriously thinks this would be the case.
I live in Milwaukee, nice way to go Walker and thank you republicans. I hope we all will enjoy what's coming up, Next is to get rid of Minimum wages, get rid of the labor laws then companies can pay you as low as they want maybe $2 per hour like in China I mean $2 per day and no companies will send jobs over sea. I don't care because I have enough money and it actually gonna save me money. It is a win for WI and America HEHEHEHE.
Oh and here's the real take-away. If Walker really wanted to solve his states problems and was a good leader, he would have talked to the Unions instead of trying to bust them. Look at what Ford did recently and low-and-behold, they are doing really well. This was not about solving the state's budget problem, this was an ideological fight. Funny part is Walker thinks he is actually going to keep his office now. He's just made sure he and other Republicans will not get reelected in Wisconsin.
In what world does the cost of living ever go DOWN? It simply is not possible. It will not happen- but your theory would be correct if it could happen. Food costs will not go down, housing prices will not go down, fuel costs will not go down, but wages are going down, as are job prospects, social security wages (possibly)- and an unprecedented amount of outsourcing, and in country outsourcing to robotics.
Unions fight for fair wages for everyone- something that I do contest. It should be easier for union employees to be fired. I agree. However, where would the subjectivity end? Scrambolo's assessment is quite accurate. This is indeed how the economics are constructed.
For those of you who equate Liberal with Democrat, you could not be FURTHER from the TRUTH.
Liberal=Republican
Liberal=little to no government interference in the public square, less taxes,less lawmaking that affects changes in the "quality of life" spectrum, such as the right to bear arms
Republican=all of the above
Democrat= diametrically opposed to the above
America could be gone forever. It saddens me to say this but we are broke, overrun by corporations, and our government, regardless of party affiliation, is co-opted by those corporations. For the first time in our nation's history we have little to no hope of a better future. When will the real Americans, such as You and I, the John Q. Publics, rally to restore? We should realize what has been taken from our reach; that what was once attainable is now a pipedream. This affects us all- the "new reality." It's time to reconceptualize and fight, or lie down and submit.
Senator Cunningham (R Missouri) is busy rewriting history. Because as we speak, she is working to roll back the Child Labor Laws to 1918.
Other GOP priorities include taking away health care, family planning and cancer screening from millions of women, union busting in Wisconsin and cutting cop's jobs.
While folks are dying in the middle east trying to get some signs of fairness and democracy in the 21st century, this Republican leadership is spending our own money to send us back to the 18th century.
I'm private sector. I make a tad over $60K a year at age 61 when I used to make somewhat more. I pay $237.39 every two weeks into my 401(k). I pay $100 into a health savings account because I have high deductible health insurance for which I pay another $95, and dental insurance of $23.50. I also pay another $45 for accidental death and life insurance for me and my wife. I'll have to work until I'm 66 for full SS benefits.
If I were public sector union, I'd have been retired for some time now, bringing in a living income. I'd have free health care for life.
Don't tell me that public and private sectors are equal. They aren't. I guaran-dam-tee you that most police and fire here in Ca. join because of the perks and benefits, and so do teachers. If the perks and bennies weren't so lucrative, they wouldn't do it. Would you?
Oh I see so when most of the country is making much lower wages all the prices are going to drop accordingly. Oh that's really cool.
You really believe that the US can drop to third world incomes and still maintain a 1st world standard of living? Really?
The ONLY thing that separates the 1st world from the third world is education, and standard of living (which includes social safety nets). That's it. Its not the military. Lots of third world nations have powerful armies. Its not the over all amount of wealth lots of third world countries have massive wealth (it just happens to be in the hands of a tiny percentage at the top sound familiar?). Its all in education and standard of living.
For years conservatives trumpeted that Communism would fail because ultimately it equalizes by making everyone poor. But Capitalism increases the quality of life and standard of living. Now Conservatives are being made to accept that high quality of life, is just not doable.
We all have to accept that we have to live poverty standards so our companies can be profitable. Nevermind that salaries and standards of living for those at the top of companies is still going to increase. Because the important thing isn't in production quality, or in safety, or worker's benefits. The important thing that we're all working for is that the C Club and the share holders can garner an ever growing percentage of money. And don't say that since they're absorbing all the profits of the company, and are hording far more resources than is reasonable for an individual, and that they can only have that level of profit because of the efforts of their employees. All of that is OK because they have "earned" it. They have current possession of the resources, so taking any of that back for the common good is theft. It doesn't matter if it was gained through unethical behavior, treachery, and dishonesty. They have it now so obviously they earned it. Now be good and go work harder to give them more. That's freedom! That's Liberty! That's what the Founding Father's risked revolution against the most powerful empire on earth to give us. Their great dream was that all men would one day serve under an entitled aristocracy. Its all the Declaration just read it!
scrambolo -- lower wages for some are inevitable. How do you think we can compete, even with higher productivity, when the rest of the world makes a fraction of what we do. I think we need to dump some of our bloat before we proceed too far.
Seriously! The first thing this corporate shill (Governor) did in office was give large corporations massive tax breaks. Why does this all sound familiar! According to several independent sources what had been essentially budget "neutrality" become a short fall!!! Guess who is making up the difference - working Americans. But that isn't the only reason why you will see this trend going Nation wide - the Republican's are going after the collective bargaining of "all" state and federal workers because they have traditionally supported the Democratic Party. This is POLITICS
dressed up as fiscal austerity (Carl Rove said as much - the only honest thing he has ever said)! Corporations will in the end be the only entities that benefit from Citizens United and armies of lobbyists. Wake up people - in the end they will privatize everything including the police and the fire department. Your house will burn if you missed a payment and Black Water will be the local constabulary. You think I'm joking - when it is all done and said America will have the look and feel of a some science fiction movie where morally bankrupt and yes overtly evil corporations are the government and run everything! Oh, and they will throw the best of the 19th century into the mix for good measure - debtors prison, work houses, cities suffocating in pollution (see London Fog). Our economy was tanked by Republican deregulation and Corporate greed and now there using the outcome as a pretext for going after American workers and every aspect of a once great and progressive society!
Comparing the economy to a bus ride he said the following “We can’t have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don’t mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.” Oct 25, Woonsocket RI, My Hometown
While I am not a fan of Unions, I don't believe this strong arm tactic is good. I wonder how long it will be before Unions will be necessary again? 20-30 years? Someone above referenced that if the cost of labor went down, the cost of goods would go down as well. This is pure BS. If the cost of labor goes down, the price will remain the same or go up, because corporates are about maximizing profits. Period! If they are making $10 a widget now, and can reduce their costs to make the widget by 50%, they just maximized their profit and are now setting the level of profit expected by that new amount. All bonuses for the management will now be based on this new profit margin, and the worker will still trudge through production, further widening the gap between the haves and have nots.
I am a conservative cheesehead and BHO's words are what scares me....Walker seems to have taken a page out of Obama's book and it may backfire on him. And that's the last thing we need to have happen here. No one from either side likes stuff rammed down their throats and only have a week to consider it. While a approve of the proposal, the way it's playing out may do more long term harm than good.
As a person born and raised in wisconsin, this vote tears my heart out.
The problem in this country, not just WI, was caused by big business and politicians. The republicans are blaming workers.
REMEMBER:
Workers didn't cause the housing collapse, Banks and Business did.
Workers didn't cause gas & oil prices over $3.50 a gallon, politicians and big business did.
Workers didn't cause the wall street collapse, Bernie madorff did, with his cronies and of course santioned by politicians.
Teachers didn't cause the education problem, the republican "No Chil left Behind" policy did it.
Brilliant, brilliant, BRILLIANT... Precipitate the greatest recession in American History through deregulation. Fight a preemptive war (Daddy's war) without raising taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Give tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires and think the jobs are going to fall mana from heaven (didn't happen). And after all this you blame the tanked economy on working Americans! Brilliant!
You forget one thing. We have to stop buying from those companies who are outsourcing our jobs to other countries "to maximize profits". I stopped buying from Wal-Mart and Target because most of the items they sell are products made in other countries. I actually went in and looked for the "Made in the USA" label and didn't see it on 80% of the items. As long as we reward these companies for doing away with the American Worker, we are sunk, we just don't know it.
Brilliant, brilliant, BRILLIANT... Precipitate the greatest recession in American History through deregulation. Fight a preemptive war (Daddy's war) without raising taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Give tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires and think the jobs are going to fall mana from heaven (didn't happen). Give tax breaks to corporations to send jobs overseas (sounds like treason to me.) Now wrap it all up in the American flag, show an American Eagle (do you hear the screech) and the best photo op of all history (Bush standing on top of the ruble of 9/11) -presto! And after all this you blame the tanked economy on working Americans! Brilliant!
Critical Thinker... Teachers were doing poorly long before NCLB became law. On the other hand, You had Michelle Rhee in DC firing the bad teachers and student averages were going up yearly.
Gas is so high not solely because of our politicians. OPEC members pretty much determine gas prices.
The housing collapse happened from Banks offering the homes because the Gov told them to. The worker is at fault for taking up ARM loans that they should have been smart enough to not take.
Banks had more to do with the Wall Street collapse than Madoff.
Futyler Tolosa, you and your ilk who help vote the Republicans into office, are the reason why America is falling into Second World status with Third World status not far behind. You don't seem to get the fact that if wages, benefits, etc. are cut, the corporations are not going to slash prices or the cost of food won't go down. It is all about money. Why do you think companies go overseas to make their products and avoid taxes in the US, because the bottom line to them is how much money they can make. They don't care about your welfare or anybody else. It is money and greed!
Thanks for nothing and dragging the USA down. The race to the bottom has only just begun.
Let me guess - your not a Working American? Or if you are you are the exception and everyone is not up to your standards? What is it about people on the right - they constantly do the, "I'm more patriotic then you" at every turn but yet they seem to have at their heart an utter contempt for their fellow Americans! It isn't about loving America... it is about loving your fellow man (I think I heard someone called Jesus talking about this).
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - BLAME THE VICTIM! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
please raise your Liberal Blinders long enough to understand....If the cost of living is reduced by the same percentage as wages and benefits, your lifestyle will not change, except that now our product will be viable in a world economy and jobs will stop going overseas....and any organization that's not smart enough to understand that that need to be eliminated
Note the somewhat idiotic belief that:
A: Labor costs will decline
B: That imaginary decline in costs would lead to lower prices
The real problem is that coorporations have no compeititon, and the ones that do typically do not compete on price [Its all about the "Features" now]. As there is no price compeititon, there is no mechanism to lower prices.
Coorporations have had their most profitable years in history, partly due to a decline in wages that has been going on for well over a decade. And tell me, have prices of goods dropped in proportion to our declining wages? Absolutly NOT!
Supply-side theory is hopelessly flawed, it assumes that if a good is made for cheap, someone, somewhere will buy it, creating an economic exchange. Problem is, even this theory depends that people have the WAGES to pay for said goods. As wages continue to decline, consumer spending will also drop, eventually reaching a point where the economy will tumble. You see this same EXACT mechanic in the current recession.
As such, you produce a short-term savings, but long term economic disaster, all based on a theory economists have largly said would never work for the past 30 years. And in response to that trouble, you'll see these same people give coorporations even more cost savings, at the expense of the worker, driving down consumer spending even more.
The US economy is looking more and more like the Mexican one each day. A small upper class that controls the majority of the wealth, and a large lower class with no money to spend. Coorporations do GREAT, exporting to other countries, but at home, due to no one buying goods, the economy is in the pits. This WILL happen to the US, and Republicans will have no one but themselves to blame.
PleaseNo: You reference the very first comment by Cloudy who floated us all a bit of misinformed 'ramming'.
Those words were spoken from the podium by Michael Steele on his exit. They were Steele's very last two words as Chair of RNC and he would not deny it.
American Jobs are going overseas because.......... you cannot sell a Mexican, that makes a dollar a day, a pair of levis made by a worker that costs $20 per hour, and you cannot sell an American a pair of levis made in America while the store shelves are filled will the Mexican Version
You can't sell an American good to a Mexican because mexicans don't have money to spend, because they aren't paid in the first place. And as a results of those savings, Mexican goods can undercut american ones.
Democrats solution: Allow workers to make more money, giving them the ability to pay for the higher quality [american] goods.
Republicans solution: Reduce worker wages farther, so coorporations can [maybe] reduce their profits to make their goods more attractive.
I'll take the first, thanks. Its sad that Americans don't think their wages should be adjusted to match inflation anymore...
This movement should be extencded to ALL UNIONs. The leader in Egypt was like the Union and the people got fedup. What puts Union workers above Public workers? Bias to get free bene's,pay and time off. Unions at all levels (local to Federal) should be outlawed. Ones skills will reflect ones pay. It's time to be accountable for tax money at ALL LEVELs and stop the FREE Ride for Unions.
The same liberals who claim to be champions of the unions (and workers) buy foreign goods at much higher rates than conservatives. Boy they (libs) sure do complain about all the jobs being shipped over seas....AND THEN THEY BUY FOREIGN PRODUCTS!
Want proof? go to a democratic fundraiser and look at how may toyota's and subaru's are in the parking lot. Go to a republican one and you will see a sea of F-150's
I hope everyone who is cheering this vote also applauds the fact that they made sure the fat cats on the top get to keep more of the money they won't have to pay the workers of this country. They knew what they were doing, first secure my right to amass more wealth than man has every made, second stick it to the workers. GOP dream come true.
Its not the worker making 20 dollars an hour that makes the levi's unobtainable. Its the management overhead that doen't put anything into the actual product but rakes in 540 dollars an hour. How is this is union's fault?
I'm in a public sector union, started working at age 20.
After 15 years in, the union helped me fight for a promotion I deserved but didn't get due to nepotsim, with the unions help I won. Now I have 30 years in but I will have to put in at least 15 to 20 more for FULL Benifits (if I and they still exist then) thats 45 to 50 years of service.
I will recieve no SS benefits, and due to recent changes most likely will have to pay for Supplemental insurance out of my pension.
Retirement Age extension is being bandied about at the state house which could add up to 5 yrs to my retirement plans. (what are those?)
With Health care benefits decreasing while costs are increasing. Things aren't looking so good there either.
Property taxes keep increasing taking along my fixed rate mortage which aint looking so fixed.
15,000 ? You do realize that would not even fill one end zone section of Lambeau Field. Kinda weak for a blue state. Ah, we all miss the 60's when the Left knew how to protest. Remember Chicago, Daily,bashing some heads, the good ol'days.
And what about the children? All those teachers denying all those children an education. What about the poor children who now will go hungry without their Michelle Obama breakfast, lunch, and dinners? If their parents are forced to feed them they might get fat !
The teachers let the students get out of class to attend this rally, and the students really have no idea why they are there in the first place (see below link). Maybe the students are failing some of their classes and are getting "credits" for attending.
Other videos show sideline "cheerleaders" provoking the students in their protests. A close look at some of these "cheerleaders" might have one envision them as a teacher. Take a close look to the bottom left of the following video:
Want proof? go to a democratic fundraiser and look at how may toyota's and subaru's are in the parking lot. Go to a republican one and you will see a sea of F-150's
You ARE aware of where those cars are actually assembled, right? You kinda blew up your own argument...
The leader in Egypt was like the Union and the people got fedup.
WTH are you smoking?
What puts Union workers above Public workers?
Nothing. They simply put forward an agreement that Business/States AGREED TO. Nothing is stopping individual business/states from not resigning a deal with a union and replacing the workers, after all.
Bias to get free bene's,pay and time off.
The benifits package is paid for as part of the labor agreement, no different then your standard employer sponsered healthcare package. And LOTS of private sector fails have personal time off policies [at least here in NY].
Unions at all levels (local to Federal) should be outlawed.
Yes, workers have no rights to negotiate their own pay, it must be mandated for them. How very un-democratic.
Ones skills will reflect ones pay.
That assumes that competing business offer compeiting wages. No compeititon leads directly to wage deflation, such as we've seen for the past decade in the private sector. But hey, guess that means an american worker is worth less today then he was in 2000...
Yes, in a PERFECT capitalist environment, there would be no need for Unions. That being said, as coorporations do not compete significantly [especially on prices and wages], we see the deadly combination of rising prices and falling wages. Hence, Unions are still needed.
It's time to be accountable for tax money at ALL LEVELs and stop the FREE Ride for Unions.
What "free rides" are you referring to? Yes, some unions desperatly need reform [most teachers unions need to wake up, and understand that performance based, and not longevity based tenure is the way to go], but the majority of unions do NOT get "free rides", and in fact are worse off then their private sector counterparts.
Look Byl and others supporting these unions. Let's just say we take all of the assets from the rich and spread it around to the states and federals government. Fine, lets be generous and say we lower our debt across the board 50%.
THEN WHAT?
Then you only have the middle class paying taxes and the level of spending will STILL not be sustainable. You still have federal, state and local employees stomping their feet saying GIMME, GIMME, GIMME.
It's been a good run, but it's time to stop the madness. NO ONE has a RIGHT to a generous pension plan or health insurance or anything except, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I'm sorry not everyone can be management or business owner material. That's life. You can, however, work your butt off to get to a level of self sustainable if you choose. If the world were made up of nothing but executives very little would get done, but at the same time, if the world were made up of only blue collar workers, we would have never see the advancements we have. In order for the private sector to succeed, someone has to have the money to start a business or the idea or know how or sheer determination. Only then can they employee those without those attributes. Without the private sector the public sector cannot survive.
profits and management will always be the same. the only thing that effects costs is workers pay. so there you go. anytime they have to pay someone $20/hr to sew a seam, then that garment is going to be too expensive for most americans. my wife is a RN with degfree and 20+ yrs experience. takes care of all those family members who need special things. she makes $25/hr and has to pay for her own insurance. what makes your sewing machine operator so valuable
This is the funniest quote from the story yet. If the Dems/Libs/Unions want to be taken seriously they need to stop making retarded comments like this;
"The story around the world is the rush to democracy," said Democratic Sen. Bob Jauch of Poplar. "The story in Wisconsin is the end of the democratic process."
So Sen. Bob (the nob) Jauch's definition of the democratic process is disrupting the legislative process of the democratically elected Wisconsin House and Senate? Wait! Is he talking about what him and his ilk are doing?
Look Byl and others supporting these unions. Let's just say we take all of the assets from the rich and spread it around to the states and federals government. Fine, lets be generous and say we lower our debt across the board 50%.
THEN WHAT?
Then you would produce economic growth, raising GDP while the debt remained relativly flat, reducing the proportion of Debt as a percentage of GDP.
The country runs on CONSUMER SPENDING; as such, having 1% of the population make over 50% of the income is NOT a sustainable model. Those figures are actually pretty close to countries like Mexico, and you see how well they are doing...
the only thing that effects costs is workers pay
So, the rising costs of oil, needed for both production and transportation of goods has NOTHING to do with the cost of a good? What about international businiss practices?
Secondly, if workers aren't paid sufficent wages, who is going to purchase the good you spent so much to create? Henry Ford was a genus in that regard; he paid his line workers the then unheard of wage of $1/hr to produce his cars, creating a market for his product in the process. Again, take a country like Mexico, where workers mass produce goods, but can't afford to buy them themselves. Great for the coorporation, who makes a killing overseas, but bad for mexico, which has no real economic growth to show for those proifts.
As long as people believe business profits have ANY effect on economic growth ,the US will continue to struggle economically.
So Sen. Bob (the nob) Jauch's definition of the democratic process is disrupting the legislative process of the democratically elected Wisconsin House and Senate? Wait! Is he talking about what him and his ilk are doing?
Unions are essentially representative bodies that represent their workers views, no different then a political party. As such, its no stretch to say that taking away Unions rights to negotiate is testamount to being anti-democratic in practice, as your saying that workers have no right to negotiate for fair wages, leaving it up to the company.
Actually I didn't say tax the rich (in this thread) what I said was, bust up the unions, give the american worker less of a voice and put the screws to the common man all you want. You won't see a dime of these savings. Not in your taxes, not in your consumer costs, not anywhere. Quality may suffer. Real people may suffer. But not the bottom line for the already wealthy.
So if I take your fantasy land trip where we tax the wealthy 50% What would happen then? Most likely we'd see infrastructure being rebuilt, schools would get the fixes they desperately need, there may be new shelters opened for the less fortunate. I can see how this bleak world view would make you quake in your boots.
"The story around the world is the rush to democracy," said Democratic Sen. Bob Jauch of Poplar. "The story in Wisconsin is the end of the democratic process."
Nice try at a 'spin', but it would seem that STOPPING a vote by democratically elected legislators more nearly constitutes the 'end of the democratic process'.
Not a bus ride. He pointed out that the Republicans drove the economy into a ditch, in large part by catering to wealthy special interest groups; that it had been left to others to pull the car out; and now that the car was ready to get back on the road, "We can't have special interests sitting shotgun. We have to have middle class families up front."
progress would be slower and more sustainable. The biggest thing that would occur under your scenario is that the peak wealth would be distributed evenly enough so that the accumulations could not be used to subvert the will and needs of the many, as is not the case today with the corporate ownership of government and the actions of the unjust, greedy evil men who have destroyed us for their own gain as they owe no allegiance to nation, only allegiance to mammon.
Hmmm, my workers made me profits, big profits. Hmm do I share with them for their increased effort, or do I pocket it as my due. Hmmm, guess I'm the decider. Screw them.
When there is plenty it belongs to me. When there is want, we share.
That's a very fair point about Obama's "We won" quote. I was very diasppointed with that comment from Obama. One of the reasons I voted for him was that I didn't believe him to the kind of person to say stuff like "I earned capital and now I intend to spend it". Yet he did.
Still, at some point you'd think one side or the other would learn from history. 1) GOP pushes too hard, ignores left.
2) Dems win in a landslide.
3) GOP legislation is wiped out and then some.
4) Dems push too hard, ignore right... wash, rinse, repeat.
Leaving aside the particular legislation, I just don't see the value in pushing something through that is so vehemently opposed by the other side. Not only does it get you kicked out of office the next cycle, but it ends of facing the same fate the healthcare law now seems destined to face.
Seems to me Walker and the GOP have a better opportunity to leave some sort of lasting legacy by making some concessions...
Futyler Tolosa..................the one problem I have with your claim of cheaper goods from other country's is easy...what those people are paid are not living wages and their governments only allow them to do so much. As for cheaper cost in goods. you are also getting cheaper products....however, if you will notice, all name brand products now made in theis country that are sold in most stores are made either in China, Japan or Korea..but those same products are no cheap by any means.
This is still the United States of America and the Constitution has not yet been buried, so if I wish to speak, even if I am a minority, I will still be able to do that. So, screw your "sitting down and shutting up".
Uhmmm....does anyone actually READ the article they are commenting on? Where is there one word about corporations? This is about public employees that are paid by the state and taxpayer.
Scrambolo....while I understand your post, and although you say you're retired, I doubt you're old enough to remember a time when workers had no rights.
Up until the early 1900's and the real formation of organized unions, there were a lot situations of laborers being used and abused. We've come a long way.
Unions were there to protect the safety of workers. Today we have OSHA, along with other local and state agencies, that require employers to maintain a safe working environment
Unions prevented employers from taking advantage of poor economic times by exploiting workers with slave labor wages. This was before a federal minimum wage was established.
Unions provided benefits and forced employers to provide benefits to those injured on the job or laid off. Workers compensation laws are in every state and mandate that an employer is responsible for the injuries, lost wages and any disability a person suffers in their course of employment. Unemployment now covers those that involuntarily lose their position for a period of time until they can get another job.
Unions forced employers to allow people to retire and pay them via pensions, etc. Today we have social security. It wasn't around when Unions were still needed.
Unions were formed to protect workers from having to work extreme hours. The departments of labor of each state now mandate that. They also have child labor laws to prevent the exploitation of the youthful.
So, what exactly do unions do besides allowing someone to work for a lower wage if they want? It is a free country.
This absence tactic has been done before in other states.
After the minority GOP obstructed 420 bills passed by the House from 2009 to 2010 elections, they got a lot of nerve criticizing the Dems on anything like this.
The WI bill is really an assault on unions, not about the budget. As usual, GOP has tried a bait and switch to try and get what it really wants. Dems literally didn't stand for it.
"The plan is to try and slow this down because it's an extreme piece of legislation that's tearing this state apart," Sen. Jon Erpenbach said in a telephone interview.
the reason why he and the the other pos left, or should i say, went to go pout, was so they could help ag on the issue tearing the state apart. but hey.... what part of broke dont these idiots understand? oh, i forgot, nothing new when it comes to democrats, and the unions, the word "BROKE" just isnt in their vocabulary. well there's 2 ways to go about this, i see walker taking the more responsible approach, trying to at least keeping the people working. but hey... you want to do it that way fine! then dont bother crying when your standing in the unemployment line with the rest of us.... cause to be perfectly honest, it doesnt matter to me either way. welcome to today people, where you cant have everything your way without a little sacrifice....
you have posted on and babbled about and dished on MANY things that conservatives have said and VERY SELDOM qouted "verbatim" what was said...but then that is the way of the Jethro's
here is what your king did say and it's pretty damn m close to what the poster said, not to mention that your claims of "superior intellect" would lead one to belive that you "got the message"
He said: "we can't have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don't mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back."
kinda hard to tell if the stupidity of denying what he said is an act or real......you look it up
Hey fool, why are we broke...oh yeah it was Boob JR that almost put us into another great depression-so forgive me if I don't take Republitards economic advice!
Bottom line teachers are paid terribly, and deserve to get some sort of retirement. They take your little gems and educate them-you don't help at all, you don't even pay attention. They work well over forty hours/week without extra pay to teach your kids. My wife was supposed to get an increase in pay from 40K/yr to 45 (after working 20yrs(!), but the state froze her automatic step (step up is for number of years on the job). She now gets paid about 6k more than a starting teacher for 20yrs experience. She loves her job, but is strangled with paperwork, and having to update a computer grade line (for 3rd grade) that nobody reads! Parents are mostly grateful for her work, but are too busy to show up on parent night (my wife attends for free). She gets slightly more respect than a day care employee, and pay that most college grads (those who major in USEFUL areas) would not accept. She has a friend who is single, with no kids, who cannot afford to buy a house on her pay-she will NEVER be able to afford a house on her own! So before you applaud the Republitards for being so smart and thrifty, remember that their goal is to destroy public education, and so far, they are winning!
Why should the Dems vote if their vote will not change anything? The Republicans own it. Why should I vote if I am not either Dem or GOP? They own the government.
Why would the Dems do this in full view of the world if they had any other worthwhile choice?
they deserve to work like everyone else...one would think that our children would have better educations given to babble you posted...try "Waiting for Superman" for a glimpse of what teachers unions are doing to the public school system...it ain't pretty
hey Jill...did you say the same thing when the Healthcare Reform Scam and the Stupulous Bill were being crafted behind closed doors?...I think not, that is not the way of the liberal Jethro, or Jethrine as the case may be
so you are telling us that the all powerful union crime syndicate didn't properly "colletively bargain" for your wife...that sounds like a personal problem...and shows that being part of the union crime syndicate isn't that helpfull now doesn't it
how many of these "teachers" have missed school time hanging out at the statehouse?...that is tantamount to a strike and they should be fired for an illegal strike...
...oh , and according to people in the city , these people have been leaving litter all over the place , also typical of the liberal Jethro, you know, "save the environment" and all...
you liberal Jethro's had a "super majority" during that time and a Jethro in the White House...republicans couldn't obstruct anything without the help of some of your liberal Jethro's...
Everything you have state is true. We have LAWS which were passed because of unions which protect workers. However currently in the state of Wisconsin we have a LAW which says that public employees have the right to collectively bargain. The current legislature is trying to pass a NEW LAW which will take away that right. What is to stop national legislators from passing NEW LAWS which can do away with OSHA, minimum wage, etc. Then where will we be?
First they came for the communists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist. ... Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.
"However, Niemöller only gradually abandoned his sympathies with National Socialism and even made pejorative remarks about Jews of faith while protecting—in his own church—baptised Christians, persecuted as Jews by the Nazis, due to their or their forefathers' Jewish descent. In one sermon in 1935, he remarked: "What is the reason for [their] obvious punishment, which has lasted for thousands of years? Dear brethren, the reason is easily given: the Jews brought the Christ of God to the cross!"
how come the liberal Jethro's aren't up in arms about the Hilter signs and other such hate speech from the criminal teachers union crime syndicate members who are striking illegally?
they aren't because liberal Jethro's aren't really against "hate speech" when they are the one leveling it. Where is Obobo the Clown and his "civility" sermons?...hate speech is the Jethro forte and it is one of their finest traits
commonsense..."He pointed out that the Republicans drove the economy into a ditch"
That 'sound bite' is getting a little old. A Republican President and a Democratic Congress may have driven the economy to the side of the road, but it was the Democrats in total control that "Drove the car into the ditch".
Lawmakers running out of town? People take to the streets? What are we, Egypt?
The left couldn't say enough evil about the "radical" Tea Partiers, organizing protests and rallies. But then, protests and rallies are only noble if run by liberals, didn't you know?
Can you imagine what they would have said if the Repubs ran away when it came time for the Health Care Reform vote? I think Joe on Main Street can see the hypocrisy here and is not buying into it.
Yes Critical Thinker (Maine), blame the worker is right and blame the unions. Unions have created an environment that promotes greed and laziness amongst the members, not to mention strong arming idiot demorats into signing these ridiculous agreements that have all but bankrupted those liberal states. Look at CA, NY, NJ the list goes on and on.
Why shouldn't these people be accountable for their jobs just as the rest of us are? Unions are a disease, we've got the cure.
Everyone keeps referring to one state that has teachers getting paid $110,000/yr. That amound does not apply to all states. I'm in California. My step-mother, as I mentioned before, just retired from teaching High School. Her Salary before retiring after nearly 40 years of teaching was $70,000/yr. She has a masters degree in English. A masters degree in many other fields brings in six figures in most cases. So a degreed individual that has chosen to teach is getting paid less than people with the same level of education going into business.
Furthermore, where does the States cut back on first when they are experiencing financial crises? They attack the public education and start cutting back on educational programs which means cutting back on teacher's jobs.
Of all the programs that our taxes paid for, Education is one that IS a good tax expense. They need to cut back on the useless programs that are generally kept because they are some legislator's baby.
I do agree that Public School Teachers need to be held accountable with how they are teaching. And stop passing our kids, just to get rid of them. Not all districts are guilty of this problem, but enough are that are making the news and giving the profession a bad name.
You guys knocking on the teachers, you are going to end up shooting yourselves in the foot. You need to tackle the teaching problems from another angle and not attacking their bargaining power.
Breaking up Unions has always been on the Republican Agenda since the first Unions were established. The American Legion was established by the Republican Party for the sole purpose of breaking up Unions back in the 1920's when they were speading Anti-Semitic and Anti-Communist Propaganda after WWI.
am I sure there are times when a CEO takes a voluntary hit when the company is in trouble...YES
actually, most unions will take the cut when there isn't any other choice. the real problem with whats happening here is the attempt to completely destroy the public employee unions. I do feel tht they have grown too powerful at the state level, and need to reduce their influence, but gutting them completely without even talking beforehand is not going to help anyhting.
"The price goes up, wages go down, and CEO profits/bonuses soar soar soar!"
So, bottom line is that you are jealous of the success of others and feel that they owe you something. They don't. You have the right to pursue happiness, but not at the expense of others. Make it on your own and become an America dream.
so Bob, does the "Pursuit of the almighty dollar" justify any action that will make the poor even poorer as long as the rich and powerful are allowed to keep them "in their place"?
it's one thing if the CEO increases profitability of a company without putting it entirely on the backs of the employees, I agree that they should be rewarded well for doing just that. it's another thing when the CEO forces the employess to take cuts in pay and benefits while collecting an enormous bonus and not taking a similar salary cut and still recieving a ridiculous bonus for forcing employees to suffer. any idiot can just cut employees/employee pay and tell them "work harder".
Please explain the real world??? Like when the private sector brings this country to its knees and no one is responsible for the mess they created??? How many people has the justice department prosecuted for the financial mess??? NOT ONE, so not only is it ok to steal and commit fraud but will give you all the money you need to fix the problem, right. Or would you speaking of the real world where we must honor contracts for AIG and the likes but low hanging fruit such as public employees contracts because we all live in our mansions driving Maserati's to our $50,000 jobs, really??? These people are your neighbors and friends, oh and by the way they pay a portion of their own salary by the mere fact that they live and work for the State or local municipality. Do you pay a portion of your salary??? Democrats are awful but the Republicans are even worse... I assume you are making over $250,000, oh no, so you protecting your future lottery winnings??? get real...
Well said Scott. In the real world we all get paid based upon our efforts...not adjustments to inflation or pre-negotiated wage increases. We are also employed at will.
The public sector employees should be held to the same standards. That's not harsh...it's fair.
they said in the article that wisconsin has been a rock of "employees rights".
when did it become a "RIGHT" to be a union worker?
here in texas the union is weaker than a 3 dollar bill. the unions have no "rights" here since texas is a right to work state. so how is this infringing on their liberties?
infact....
how many parents had to stay home to watch the kids?
so the union is showing just why this needs to happen. they have affected more lives than just their own by staying home, so way to go unions!!!!
keep proving exactly why your methods are outdated!!
your lucky to have a job you over paid do nothings!!
REALLY Dave? Since when was a teaching job a piece of cake? Those people who make sure your brats don't turn out to be idiots probably clock more hours in a week than you do in a month. It isn't a 9-5 job.
Add to that the money they spend out of their own pockets just to make sure the kids have supplies (because the schools can't afford to pay for it), the 30+ kids per class that they are responsible for, AND the ungrateful, idiot parents who refuse to understand why their kid got an "F" for never doing their homework, and their Level of Effort probably far surpases yours or any of your coworkers. It is a truly thankless position, proven by the attitudes demonstrated on this forum alone.
Here is a dose of reality: you think these people are so useless? then pull your kids out of school and see how far they get in life
Umm - Texas is an "at will" state. My employer makes everyone sign a document every year stating we understand that.
People should be outraged to see unions attacked. Unions are the reason we have child labor laws, minimum wage and those things (pesky to corporations) that we call benefits - workers rights, 40 horu workweeks, paid time off including vacation, etc.
The more power this country gives to corporations via their puppets, the Republicans, the more I see us returning, not just to the late 1800s, but all the way back to Europe of the Dark Ages when business owners paid people starvation wages because THEY COULD.
Boy you conservatives sheep following lost puppies just don't get it. Unions bulit this country, yes not all Unions are good, but the majority of them do a good job. I love how you think that public employees do nothing make to much and have great benefits. You don't know "WTH" you are talking about most of these people make 30,000 a year and pay taxes just like you and me. Bottom line is this is nothing but union busting period. There has never been any conservative President that has ever done anything good for the American people. All of the labor laws workers protection rights, were started by unions, and the democratic party. You sheep won't wake up until this country becomes a 3rd world country. The conservatives want people to work for pennies $7-$10 an hour with very little benefits. Try living on that wage. Its not the unions fault that the states gov't screwed up the money that was there same can be said for the feds. If this continues i can see the American people standing up to these whack jobs and what you see happening in the Middle East will happen here.
Seriously! The first thing this corporate shill (Governor) did in office was give large corporations massive tax breaks. Why does this all sound familiar! According to several independent sources what had been essentially budget "neutrality" become a short fall!!! Guess who is making up the difference - working Americans. But that isn't the only reason why you will see this trend going Nation wide - the Republican's are going after the collective bargaining of "all" state and federal workers because they have traditionally supported the Democratic Party. This is POLITICS
dressed up as fiscal austerity (Carl Rove said as much - the only honest thing he has ever said)! Corporations will in the end be the only entities that benefit from Citizens United and armies of lobbyists. Wake up people - in the end they will privatize everything including the police and the fire department. Your house will burn if you missed a payment and Black Water will be the local constabulary. You think I'm joking - when it is all done and said America will have the look and feel of a some science fiction movie where morally bankrupt and yes overtly evil corporations are the government and run everything! Oh, and they will throw the best of the 19th century into the mix for good measure - debtors prison, work houses, cities suffocating in pollution (see London Fog). Our economy was tanked by Republican deregulation and Corporate greed and now there using the outcome as a pretext for going after American workers and every aspect of a once great and progressive society!
Texas has the fastest growing population because so many people from liberal union states are having to move there to find jobs. People should get paid equivalent to the value they create. Unions are only around to falsely elevate the wages above the value.
Unions made the middle class possible. When they and all they worked to build is dismantled. You peasants on the right will be the first to moan, cry and whine about how bad things are. But who are you going to blame then?
What's both hilarious and sad is that if you guys on the right get your way. Eventually liberals will get tired of your whining and build you new Unions to protect you. And yeah you'll fight us all the way when we do. Then when the world doesn't end you'll join the unions and become proud members enjoying your benefits, salary, house, and shiny car that you "earned". You'll get all patriotic about how we live in the best country on earth and how you all worked so hard to get it there without any help. Then a natural recession will hit and someone on the right will say its those freaking unions strangling our businesses! And then you'll all jump right back in. Well that's assuming there isn't a new minority to blame at the time.
Really Markets!! then why is Texas unemployment rate is above 9% I have friends that live in Texas and its not that great down there is you say and think it is. You have a whacked out Governor also who thinks that Texas should succeed from the union.
Brilliant, brilliant, BRILLIANT... Precipitate the greatest recession in American History through deregulation. Fight a preemptive war (Daddy's war) without raising taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Give tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires and think the jobs are going to fall mana from heaven (didn't happen). Give tax breaks to corporations to send jobs overseas (sounds like treason to me.) Now wrap it all up in the American flag, show an American Eagle (do you hear the screech) and the best photo op of all history (Bush standing on top of the ruble of 9/11). And after all this you blame the tanked economy on working Americans! Brilliant!
Texas unemployment rate is much less than the national average and has experienced the most population growth. Texas has more net job creation in the past fews years than the other 49 states combined. Rick Perry doesn't want to seceed, but most of his constiteunts do. It is the bizarre "give me what I want - not earn" mentality that is crushing the country and dragging Texas down with it. Quit moaning about your wage and focus on what you are worth. Wages must equal the value someone will pay for the service.
I apologize, though my words bare repeating. Now let me ask you did you understand what I was saying - this whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - blame the victim! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
i would venture to say, Wisconsin's problems occured as a result of the politicians putting the general fund into the stock market. During to good years, nobody noticed. Now the stock market crashed, the general fund is $ XX Billion in the hole, but it's not the unions that caused it.
The unions keep the wolves at bay. Big business is the enemy.
The republicans are blaming workers.
REMEMBER:
Workers didn't cause the housing collapse, Banks and Business did.
Workers didn't cause gas & oil prices over $3.50 a gallon, politicians and big business did.
Workers didn't cause the wall street collapse, Bernie madorff did, with his cronies and of course santioned by politicians.
Teachers didn't cause the education problem, the republican "No Chil left Behind" policy did it.
15,000 protesters ? You do realize that would not even fill one end zone section of Lambeau Field. Kinda weak for a blue state. Ah, we all miss the 60's when the Left knew how to protest. Remember Chicago, Daley,bashing some heads, the good ol'days. Now, all we have is the lame Obama Rent-A-Mobs. From out of state no less.
And what about the children? All those teachers denying all those children an education. What about the poor children who now will go hungry without their Michelle Obama breakfast, lunch, and dinners? If their parents are forced to feed them they might get fat !
Unions are killing Wisconsin children !
Hey, this is fun acting like a Democrat. Hold that bus I want to join the runaways!
The teachers let the students get out of class to attend this rally, and the students really have no idea why they are there in the first place (see below link). Maybe the students are failing some of their classes and are getting "credits" for attending.
Other videos show sideline "cheerleaders" provoking the students in their protests. A close look at some of these "cheerleaders" might have one envision them as a teacher. Take a close look to the bottom left of the following video:
Sven - I sense a great Leftist angst rocking the rose colored Leftist Wack Job world
Yes, the great leftist angst of watching while a government of the people for the people dismantles the rights of the worker. The rose colored glasses we wear that makes us think we should have some rights in the work place. That employees shouldn't be subjected to dangerous conditions and we should be paid a living wage. The Wack Job world of the middle class that just doesn't understand how to sit down and shut up when the rich bosses are talking. We will learn someday, once the right has stripped the people's power.
You cry about the government providing too much for the people while you dismantle the protections we have from the corporations who want to take everything away from us they can.
Yes, the great leftist angst of watching while a government of the people for the people dismantles the rights of the worker. The rose colored glasses we wear that makes us think we should have some rights in the work place. That employees shouldn't be subjected to dangerous conditions and we should be paid a living wage. The Wack Job world of the middle class that just doesn't understand how to sit down and shut up when the rich bosses are talking. We will learn someday, once the right has stripped the people's power.
LOL! What are you doing wasting time posting on the internet?! Get back to working your 90 hours a week at $.15 an hour or I'll give your job to Marley. Marley won't complain. And Marley won't ask for seconds of gruel. Then it's debtors prison for you. You lazy shiftless good for nothing ungrateful slob! Now get back to work oiling that moving weaver! I don't care if it's dangerous. You'll do your job it you know what's good for you! Booohwwaaaaaa!
You do know how silly you sound, right? You've referenced a bunch of federal labor laws. Time to join the real world son. Time to get a job and earn your keep. Do a good job and you will be rewarded. Now run along.
Actually, Tank, if you don't follow the liberal kool-aid drinkers, you would realize that the current economic woes are equally shared by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. It was Bill Clinton put the law in place that allowed the banks to work as investment, commercial, and insurance institutions. That led to the massive issuance of subprime loans which in turn caused the housing crisis. George W. Bush's allowance for further deregulation just added the match to the dynamite. If you couldn't tell, I am an independent with some libertarian leanings.
I am a unionized public employee. My position was reclassified five years ago. I asked at that time if my position could be made non-union and was denied that request. I was moved from a bad union, which allowed me to reclaim some of my dues on the point of disagreeing with whom political funds were provided, to an even worse union. I have been a model employee with "exceeds expectations" on all reviews. I have asked my union for mediation help on one occasion where I didn't even receive a response to my request. I have to pay into my retirement account to get any matching funds. I pay private sector amounts for my health benefits. I do get seniority benefits if layoffs occur... but those have not occurred in the seven years I have been here. I basically see no benefit to paying $55 per pay check to the union in exchange for nothing in return.
I don't agree with the largest and worst union in the world, the "tenure union." Time in service should not make it impossible to fire a bad employee. I think the greatest problem in the education system is a lack of aid from parents, but we shouldn't have to continue to throw bad money after bad money. I did a search for statistics of the local average teacher salary: $65k. That's more than most of the people make in my district, an urban area that is considered in the top ten for unemployment and violent crime. My child's teacher (this year) is good, but my wife and I put in a lot of time so that our first grader is reading at a third grader's level.
I live in Ohio and, our governor is working on a similar proposal. I wish him luck because the unions have actually hurt Ohio's chances of bringing in new business.
You won't receive SS bennies because you didn't pay into the SS system. In the private sector, I must pay 7.5% of my pay into the SS system AND my employer has to match it! That is the law of the land. Public employees and legislators are exempt from that so they can fund their own pension and then, at least here in Ca., that pension fund invests in the stock market. If the fund loses money, we taxpayers are required by state law to replace it!
No such laws exist for private sector employees. I have worked for two Fortune 500 companies, and only the one I work for now provides a match of 3 percentage points on the 401k. I lost half of my IRA during the last crash. Are the taxpayers going to replace that? Yeah, right.
Once again, exercising corporate censorship, all of the comments that MSNBC/Comcast chose to hightlight under Comments on their coverage of this story were supportive of the Governor, and anti-union. Sad, but predictable. I wonder how long it will be before they start censoring here on the Vine.
New York created the most jobs..........LOL Not even in the top three!
Texas, the second-largest state, has created more jobs than any other state in Perry's time as governor. Arizona created the second-most jobs, 132,700, followed by Utah with 113,200.
Twenty states and the District of Columbia have enjoyed a net job gain during Perry's tenure, while California, the most populous state, has lost the most jobs: 827,800. Michigan lost the second most, 755,900, followed by Ohio, at 557,300.
"The story around the world is the rush to democracy," said Democratic Sen. Bob Jauch of Poplar. "The story in Wisconsin is the end of the democratic process."
This is a scream - Democracy means "majority rule" - Democrats can't STAND it!
They continually try to force a leftist minority outlook down the publics throat then yell "fascism!" when they can't succeed! Or leave the state - so much for their "democracy".
Unions did not build this country. Americans built this country. Freedom and capitalism made it possible. Unions lately have helped destroy entire industries with the aid of our socialist leaning government.
Dismantle the common sense regulations created at the end of the Great Depression. Give tax breaks to corporations to send their manufacturing and jobs overseas. Fight Daddy's War and not raise taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Precipitate the greatest recession in American History (then blame on the Democrats and home owners). Extend tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires in an economic downturn (lie about it creating jobs) and then BLAME THE VICTIMS. This is not about fiscal conservatism - this is all about politics. Republican want to destroy the right of collective bargaining so only corporations can benefit from Citizens United. BRILLIANT!!!
Lolly1192..(#3.4)...I think you don't quite have your facts right...or you trying to be "untruthful" about this 30+ kids in a classroom. In Wisconsin there isn't a single school district with more than 19 kids per 1 teacher. The average is 12-16 to 1 .....scroll the page.....
markets has no clue what he's talking about. And i'm guessing he's only parroting what he's heard. Guess what, I live in Texas. Have all my life. The unemployment rate is high here too and the jobs that can be found pay diddly. Employers are now asking for a 4 year degree for a 25-30K year job. We have a butt load of foreclosed homes. And we have the highest number of residents uninsured. And yes it is an "at will' employment state. However, there are unions all over the place in Texas. See Bell Helicopter Textron, my dad was a union man there for 35 years. See MANY of the chemical companies on the Houston ship channel, my husband works there now. See the nurses all over the state. And so on and so on. Texas is looking at a 30 billion dollar budget shortfall. We're closing schools and lord knows what else will be done. ALL of this information can be found right on state websites with a simple google search. But I guess it's much easier to repeat BS than to think for yourself. And Rick Perry is a dimwit who made threats of succession. Then again, Perry would drop to his knees and pucker for Boner in full public view in the middle of Austin at high noon if he thought it'd get him elected
Another indicator that the state’s economy has been comparatively healthy was the U.S. Bureau of the Census report that Texas added more people (nearly 4.3 million) than any other state between the census counts of 2000 and 2010.
Entering 2011, more than half the jobs shed by employers during Texas’ shorter recession have already been recovered as our economy recovers more quickly than the U.S. as a whole. Nationally, only 13.4 percent of recession-hit jobs had been recovered ending 2010.
Texas and the nation returned to economic growth in 2010, with the nation increasing its GDP by 2.8 percent and Texas increasing its GSP by 3.4 percent.
I'm bad - I forgot - give the most profitable companies in history subsidies to the tune of billions and billions and billions of dollars! And then they would have you think that it was garbage collectors, teachers and fireman who tanked the economy!
Teachers taking paid sick days and shutting schools down, denying children their education and nutritious lunch programs is fine with you...and the Elected Senators conspiring and defying an order to report to the chamber is fine with you.....sounds like Rules for Radicals....the end justifies the means....shameful.
Get some education, Mike. Any days missed over the allotted number (for example: snow days) will be made up. That tends to be a school district requirement. Kids are not "losing" anything.
FINALLY!!! Someone who knows their US History. "Reusable bag fan", you get a gold star. :)
Unions aren't destroying America and any rational thinking human can figure that one out - corporate greed is what is destroying America. Getting rid of unions is corporate America's first step on their path to total elimination of worker's rights. Welcome to the new pre-Progressive movement era.
Yes markets work the only reason that the wages intexas are so low is that employers in texas only hire wetbacks if you think any different go to any construction site in this state and see how many illegals are there as a plumber here i see it every day. If there were uniuns here they might make employers check ss numbers or green cards to see if they were real.Thats also why texas has the shoddiest construction of any of the states ive worked in.
As a Wisconsin UW student who was in high school last year, I've never had a class with less than 23-24 kids since I was in primary school. My French class during my senior year in high school had 40. My sister, who is a teacher in Madison, teaches a little less than 30 fourth graders Your source is, quite frankly, incorrect. Please don't make statements with the pretense that you are actually informed.
Add to that the money they spend out of their own pockets just to make sure the kids have supplies (because the schools can't afford to pay for it), the 30+ kids per class that they are responsible for, AND the ungrateful, idiot parents who refuse to understand why their kid got an "F" for never doing their homework, and their Level of Effort probably far surpases yours or any of your coworkers. It is a truly thankless position, proven by the attitudes demonstrated on this forum alone.
Here is a dose of reality: you think these people are so useless? then pull your kids out of school and see how far they get in life
I DID IT! I pulled my kids out of public school! Thanks to the REAL no child left behind law in Florida, they enacted school choice. Now, most of the voucher system was knocked down by the courts (thank you teacher's union!), but fortunately for my children, who are mildly autistic, they are able to receive something that was left intact, the McKay Scholarship. It works something like this:
If you have a child with disabilities, and qualify, you receive the same amount of money per child that the State says it costs to educate your children. In Florida, they say that is $8,500 per student. I was granted a total of $25,500 for my three children. So, I was able to enroll my children in private Catholic School for, get this, $13,000 for ALL THREE OF THEM. The class size is ten students per class with a teacher AND teachers aid. There scores have gone up to the point where they may actually be able to attend Catholic High School and are slowly integrating back into regular classes.
Now you explain to me how the Catholic School can do more, do better, for less money. I've got an explanation. No unions, very little overhead and bureaucracy, and decision making at the lowest level (between the teachers and parents).
I am in the military. So, unfortunately, I may have to move at some point to a State that does not have this program. I am actually considering retiring so that my children can continue to benefit from this program.
Having said all this, I have an answer to the current public education system that would not require any of this crazy vote taking or protesting. Simply allow the money to follow the child instead of the child following the money. In other words, you get a voucher from the State for X number of dollars with which you can shop around and take your child to the best school. If you want to send your child to the local public school, then great. Want your kid to go to a public school a couple of miles away, but are willing to drive them back and forth, then fantastic. Want to send them to a private school, then that's okay too. My guess is, that over a relatively short period of time, the public schools and their teachers unions would die a quick death. If they provided the better product, they would survive. My guess is that they would not.
Another indicator that the state’s economy has been comparatively healthy was the U.S. Bureau of the Census report that Texas added more people (nearly 4.3 million) than any other state between the census counts of 2000 and 2010.
Entering 2011, more than half the jobs shed by employers during Texas’ shorter recession have already been recovered as our economy recovers more quickly than the U.S. as a whole. Nationally, only 13.4 percent of recession-hit jobs had been recovered ending 2010.
Texas and the nation returned to economic growth in 2010, with the nation increasing its GDP by 2.8 percent and Texas increasing its GSP by 3.4 percent.
**************************************
I live in Texas. You clowns claiming it is an economic paradise have no clue what you're talking about. Texas has a $27 Billion dollar deficit right now. Texas also spends the least per capita on it's residents than any other state.
In Texas we're cutting schools and health-care for the elderly because there's really nothing else to cut. We've created death panels for seniors in poverty. Republicans have controlled the governor's office and legislature since 2000. The "Texas Miracle" is BS.
JPJohnson - Thank you! I also live in Texas and have grown quite weary of the mythology being spread around about how "great" our economy is. Rick Perry has more than doubled our deficit (how's that for "Republican fiscal responsibility") and we might not be able to balance our budget, which is REQUIRED by the Texas constitution. This would be the first time in Texas history if they can't figure out where to find the funds. Inclusively, we're ranked in the middle of all US states with regard to unemployment, not at the top with the lowest rates. Face facts folks, Texas isn't all it's cracked up to be.
Hey Byl, something that the Right will tell you while they are doing this, is that you need to stop depending on one source of income and that it is your fault that you are depending on working for someone else and making someone else rich on your labor.
In fact, they will tell you that you are no different than they are, just that they are just doing things a little bit differently than you.
They are not leaving it up to some employer or some government program to support them.
The programs are out there for you to make gains on your income by you not depending on someone else for mimimal amount of effort other than taking the time to do some homework.
In fact there is a means for you to stay on top of your 401K plan better than your 401K representative and you only spend about 5 minutes a day doing it.
What's really amazing is all these tools are right there at your fingertips at that computer that you are using to type responses too.
Labor is a cost driver that is over pricing our products to the point that we can't compete with foreign competitors and we can thank the over inflated wages that the unions make employers pay union employees.
Weird. All I see is another Republican holding jobs hostage unless they get their way, and make it so they can tear down unions so they can finally start treating their workers like slaves again. Then again, I never joined the Union when I worked at my local Grocery store, and was fired for having a tourette syndrome breathing tick episode after 2 months steady working there. By all means, Republicans, keep destroying jobs. We all know you're just clearing the way for our new Chinese overlords to pay back your war debts...
“Elections have consequences, and I won.” President Barack Obama -
Grow up you Wisconsin democrats, you tried to fight against it, you tired to stop it, but it is going to pass, and your stunt makes your look silly. Imagine if Republicans did something like this, the outcry would be deafening. Elections have consequences and nobody knows this better then Republicans who saw the worst Health Care bill in the nations history pass, but it did pass because that is how our system works for better or worse.
Yes, the great leftist angst of watching while a government of the people for the people dismantles the rights of the worker. The rose colored glasses we wear that makes us think we should have some rights in the work place. That employees shouldn't be subjected to dangerous conditions and we should be paid a living wage. The Wack Job world of the middle class that just doesn't understand how to sit down and shut up when the rich bosses are talking. We will learn someday, once the right has stripped the people's power.
talk about a JOKE!!!!
i am a welder with over 22 yrs on the job exsperiance, and have had the pleasure of working in both union, and non union shops. as far as quality goes, no diffrence. safety, no difference, pay wages, not much difference, actually, i worked 2 non union jobs that started me out with over $2.00 per hr more. employee rights, the only diffrence was after the probationary period, the hard working employee at the union shops turned into automatic slackers. insurance bennifits.. eh.. about the same, not much difference. that list goes on, HOWEVER..... at the non union shops, there were no union dues to pay. no hourly insurance to come out of my check to match the raise i got promised every year. for 4 years i got a dollar an hr raise, each year... my insurance i had to pay into hourly went up... yes $1.00 per hour. as far as union boys being smarter, not even close. the 3 total union shops i worked in had more idiots, who hurt themselves in the most anal of ways, i was suprised someone wasnt killed.
ill also tell you something else... when it comes to an employer keeping and fireing someone, the big stinking difference is there is seniority in the union, where a layoff is done by asking for voulenteers, and then if more are needed it goes low man on the pole, no matter how hard one works. IN THE REAL WORLD>>> your employer will keep you if you are a hard worker and not a f*** up, show up on time, and actually WORK! he will lay off the slacker, non productive worker before getting rid of the hard worker, no matter if the guy was there 5 months, or 5 years. why keep a broken part on a machine, when you can have one that actually works? its like keeping a car that doesnt run, just for the looks...
so go tell someone else how great the unions are, me, i know better, i been there done that, and you aint fooling nobody but yourself and idiots.
" On 2/12/11, pfan wrote: > Wisconsin is facing some harsh times. Take home pay of > teachers will go down over 10%, yikes! >
I agree this is bad for state employees and private work force should have to go through the same things to keep it fair and to help out. But please do not get the kids going to protest with the teachers. Those kids just made a fool of themselves and the teachers at this rally. Those kids had no idea what they were doing or why they were there. Only that their teachers brought them there. That makes the teachers look bad and they should be ashamed. That one kid didnt even know who the governor was."
Now you might start to know how it feels for the rest of America that will have their "take home pay" reduced by more than 10% when ObamaCare kicks in.....only we get to be fined or worse for not complying....only in your case the Majority of Voters in Wisconsin voted these people into office just this past November to do exactly this, what they campaigned on......so the majority of Wisconsin is not behind the teachers union.
The Unions were big backers of ObamaCare, because they think it didn't apply to them....just non-union folks.
Well Said! the Republitards screamed like the little B**ches they are, even though they almost put us all into a depression. We don't have to shut up, because we are in America-we all have a voice!
Before anyone goes on bashing Unions, give up your 40hr work week, your weekends off, put your 9 year old brats to work, and forget any paid time off!
Stop fighting each other and realize that is what the Pols want-it is only a distraction so they can lower our wages, lower our standard of living, and their corporations can make more money! You really want to get paid like you live in Mexico or India?
NO they are not blaming workers. They are attempting to correct poor management by previous administrations and trying to prevent out of control benefits from spiraling out of control again - There is a huge difference. If they don't do something there will be no state left.
REMEMBER: Workers didn't cause the housing collapse, Banks and Business did.
Banks didn't cause the collapse -
Government miss-regulation with the intention of poor people owning a home caused the collapse. The Dems got Republicans to add CRA "strenghtening to a bill that would not pass that disable the Mega Merger part of the Glass Steagall act" to give them the votes they needed to pass the bill. The revised CRA parts required low down payment, low income, with enhanced penalties to eliminate perceived racial discrimination in home mortgages. The new lows created the massive amounts of bad loans that were then passed to the Big Banks as solid. When the loans began failing at extreme rates, banks tried to unload them on the sly.
along with wiping out tax deductions for credit cards - 1982 by democrat insistance. People began moving credit card debt to second mortgages which were sub prime. There was an additional change to the law in 1994 (Democrats ran everything) that made such loans even more attractive.
Workers didn't cause gas & oil prices over $3.50 a gallon, politicians and big business did.
Here I'll agree - Politicians are the biggest reason for the gas price. Their you can drill here and not there policies, industry you use this additive hear and that additive that create shortages that producers and speculators take advantage of.
Workers didn't cause the wall street collapse, Bernie madorff did, with his cronies and of course santioned by politicians.
Bernie Madoff did not cause the collapse. The amount of money he swindled is nothing compared to what goes in and out of investments each day and no politican sanctions this type of ponzi scheme - but they do sanction a couple of ponzi schemes. The real collapse occured when foreign investors realized they were going to lose billions on Citi, BoA, and others bad mortgages. Let's just say when they cashed in $500 Billion in Treasuries in 2 hours - that got the governments attention - and forced the government to "make good" on the bad mortgages - or suffer the collapse of the entire financial system and government to boot.
Teachers didn't cause the education problem, the republican "No Chil left Behind" policy did it.
Bush requested no child left behind. It's author was Sen Ted Kennedy. Bush only required teacher merit pay, teacher testing, student testing to identify failing schools, and school vouchers for school districts that fail to educate the kids. The funding an whatever else he saw fit to include was Ted's. What we got was better triained teachers who got merit pay to teach kids only what was on the state proficiency test.

Education had degraded on it's own to "here is the theories we favor - repeat them to us and if someone says differently - they are uneducated, unintelligent, or a nut case." Used to be that all theory was talked about in depth presenting all the evidence and you figured out what was right or wrong.
Strength, courage and power to my brothers and sisters in Wisconsin .... and all union workers for standing your ground!
Don't even go at public workers pensions and health care plans after public workers / public servants average 3-5% pay increases over more than a decade.
You all want to play the 'class & caste' game? Check on the wages of your state administrations...what are they willing to give up---that goes for the Governor of WI and all other state governors.
Better yet, check out the corporate crooked 'suits' in the banking system and Wall Street and go after them! If you want to put it to your educators, firemen, and policemen, think again when you need their services!
only 49% of blacks are graduating in Wisconsin (according to their own statistics)...where are your so-called "educators"? , doesn't sound like anyone "needs" those union crime syndicate "educators" as they aren't getting the job done...sounds like the teachers union crime syndicate is playing the "class & caste" game...wake up and smell what you are shoveling
only 49% of blacks are graduating...white students are graduating at about 82%...looks like the teachers union crime syndicate are the ones playing the "class & caste" game
People had better wake up and stand up or freedom and a decent standard of living in this country will be only a fading memory. Corporations and the people who serve their interests whether the Republican governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker or Barack Obama a Democrat will never give you or defend either unless the public forces them to. I'm glad the people in Wisconsin are fighting back but the Democrats, after making a show of resisting while the cameras are on them, will probably stab the protesters in the back unless people make it known in the clearest terms that they won't stand for it, at the ballot box or in the streets:
Unite workers and youth to defeat Wisconsin budget cuts
16 February 2011
...The governor's demand for sweeping wage and benefit cuts and the outlawing of strikes is not only an assault on the state's 175,000 public sector workers. It is an assault on the entire working class and is the first step in the financial aristocracy's campaign to destroy public education, health care and other services that millions depend on.
Demonstrating his contempt for public sentiment, the governor has threatened to dispatch the National Guard to ram through his demands.
Walker's attacks on democratic rights and social spending are not unique to Wisconsin or to the Republican Party.
Instead, they are part and parcel of an orchestrated attack on working class living standards being carried out by both big business parties, led above all by the Obama administration. While handing over trillions to bail out Wall Street, provide tax breaks for the rich and finance its criminal wars, the White House has refused to help the states, which have a combined deficit of $126 billion. The budget shortfall is being seized upon as a pretext to lay waste to any form of government spending that does not boost the fortunes of the rich, the banks, and the corporations...
....Walker's attacks on democratic rights and social spending are not unique to Wisconsin or to the Republican Party.
Instead, they are part and parcel of an orchestrated attack on working class living standards being carried out by both big business parties, led above all by the Obama administration. While handing over trillions to bail out Wall Street, provide tax breaks for the rich and finance its criminal wars, the White House has refused to help the states, which have a combined deficit of $126 billion. The budget shortfall is being seized upon as a pretext to lay waste to any form of government spending that does not boost the fortunes of the rich, the banks, and the corporations.
Across the border in Illinois, the Democratic-controlled state legislature is moving toward banning the right of public school teachers to strike in order to carry forward a massive assault on public education. In Ohio, a Republican governor is working hand-in-hand with Democratic mayors to bar public employee strikes. Democratic governors in New York and California are ordering unprecedented budget cuts, just like their Republican counterparts in states such as Florida and Arizona.
At the national level, Obama has imposed a de facto pay cut on federal workers and a five-year spending freeze on all non-military items. The budget-cutter-in-chief on Monday proposed savage cuts to virtually every form of social spending, including a 50 percent cut to the already miniscule aid given to the poor and elderly so they can heat their homes in the winter.
While doing everything to boost corporate profits and the stock market, the administration has done nothing to alleviate any aspect of the social crisis—mass unemployment, the foreclosure crisis, homelessness, hunger, spiraling tuition costs....
... The claim that "tough choices" are necessary because there is not enough money is a shameless lie. The main problem facing American workers is the obscene levels of wealth monopolized by the financial aristocracy, abetted by the entire political establishment....
Fact: Wisconsin's was projected by their own accounting to have an overall budget surplus of one hundred and twenty million in 2012 (amazing considering the state of the economy Nation wide). Interesting that the Republican Governor pissed it all away in tax breaks for his corporate cronies (this was his first order of business after taking office). These tax breaks for the rich, multinationals and corporations totaled one hundred and thirty million (do the math). More importantly eliminating the American right of collective bargaining for Federal and state employees will effectively destroy and eliminate the Democratic Party's number one source of Champaign donations in any given year. This is not fiscal conservatism... this is politics! FOX News is lying on behalf of Corporate America!
Arch Stanton thumbs up to you. Public employees, unions or workers did not create the budget crisis. Bad policy decisions and rampant greed did. Unions did not cause outsourcing corporate greed did and continues still today. Corporations consistently relocate to where labor is dirt cheap and workers don't receive benefits. How could you put a roof over your head, feed your family with those wages? All workers including public employees support state and local economies. How important is a child's education, fire and police protection, or any other public service to you? Who would you attract to become teachers, firemen or policemen with those terms? Do you understand and realize the working conditions of each, the requirements, demands, and skills required? Could you do what each does for what you want to compensate them for? We get what we pay for. I'm sure the average person could find all sorts of areas to cut creating savings. However, if you think for one moment this will create measurable savings try again. Shame on anyone who thinks this is about public employee compensation. This bill is about all workers rights regardless of your career path.
what makes even more sence...hanging out in front of job center in milwaukee and throwing things at the employee's coming and going because they wont join the mass od retards. i took in a load of scrap today for gas to go to a jobfair in oshkosh, might go to milw instead, and protest against the protesters. not even sure i want to work for oshkosh truck anymore if this is the way the union for gov contracts is going to act, ill keep looking
Megalodon, did you mean you work for a state contracted union truck company? You called the protestors "retards," while you took a "load of scrap for gas to go a job fair?" Agreed, protestors should not be throwing things at anyone but I've got to wonder after your comment how you fit in. I wouldn't go so far as to call anyone "retard," just because I don't agree with them. I can recall many times from the past that people not "retards," stood up for what they believed in. Years later they were not considered rebel rousers but rather the voices of and for change. They did exactly what many are doing now protesting against a government policy. For workers all accross this nation this issue is about their rights and future working conditions. If you enjoy exchanging scraps for gas or bartering who am I to judge you or call you names. I'd like to think you can see the bigger picture not just a few overly passionate voices for the future.
We've created death panels for seniors in poverty. Republicans have controlled the governor's office and legislature since 2000. The "Texas Miracle" is BS.
there are death panels in AZ too, .
funy how the republicans were screaming "death panels!" in the health-care bill, but it's the republicans that are creating the real "death panels".
whenever the republicans start maki9ng a lot of noise to scare people about "those horrible things the democrats are planning", just look to them to implement the very same thing themselves soon.
the republicans are doing their best to create a financial elitist system that will only allow the rich to be educated, and give the rich total control over the lives of all the little peons of the rest of America
Just the typical attack on working families courtesy of the GOP, for those of you that are anti union your are entitled to your opinion, but you will be next!
Same crap here in Indiana, every state that has a GOP majority are attacking working families!
INDIANA LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
House Bill 1585: Seeks to permanently ban collective bargaining for state employees, criminalize the encouragement and participation in strikes by public employees and takes away the pensions of those who do. The bill also prohibits even voluntary collection of dues by local and state governments as well as school employers and disproportionately hurts the ability of women and minorities to bargain for better wages and working conditions. It passed out of committee and now moves to the House floor for a vote.
House Bill 1216: Prohibits project labor agreements and renders Indiana’s common construction requirements useless. Specifically the legislation exempts from common construction wage requirements projects under $1 million and all school and university projects. Currently only projects under $150,000 are exempt from this law. Passing this bill would lower the wages of Indiana’s construction workers and open the door to out-of-state workers.
House Bill 1203: An unnecessary bill designed to interfere with worker's ability to designate a union to represent them, if passed the National Labor Relations Board has already pledged to sue the state because the measure is unconstitutional.
House Bill 1538: Bars local units of government from setting a minimum wage higher than a state minimum wage, restricting an important way to put upward pressure on wages.
Senate Bill 273: Like House Bill 1585, this bill seeks to permanently ban collective bargaining for state employees and criminalize the encouragement and participation in strikes by public employees.
Senate Bill 333: Seeks to eliminate the use of all Projects Labor Agreements on publicly funded construction projects.
Senate Bill 575: Limits collective bargaining rights of Indiana’s teachers to the point of dismantling them. If passed, only wages and certain fringe benefits may be bargained. This bill eliminates bargaining of hours and days, opening the door to extremely long hours and a longer work week with no additional compensation.
Senate Bill 001: Allows for outside agencies to be used to evaluate teachers and for teachers to evaluate other teachers. Teachers will not have input into the evaluation tool. The State Board of Education will have to approve the tool chosen by a school corporation, limiting local control. There is no appeal process under this bill if a teacher is fired unjustly. The Superintendent of Public Instruction may revoke a teacher’s license at will.
House Bill 1002: Allows for charters to be established by mayors of 2nd class cities or a majority vote of a school board. The bill allows for acquisition of under-utilized buildings for $1 per year for up to 20 years. The school corporation must maintain the building. Charters have first option at any under-utilized building, meaning the corporation cannot choose to sell it if a charter wants the building. It also requires that only 50 percent of the teachers in a charters need to be licensed.
House Bill 1003: Creates vouchers to allow public money to be diverted to private schools. If passed public schools are estimated to lose $110 million.
Just the typical attack on working families courtesy of the GOP
I know! Isn't it great?!
Seriously, if you've ever spent any time in Madison you would know that this needed to be done. They have city bus drivers making over $100K a year. Not trashing the profession of driving a bus but it's not, as they say, rocket surgery.
So Madison bus drivers make $100K/year? Now is that actual salary or is it salary+benefits?
There is a distinction between the two. Why is it that the public says that it's alright for the market to pay CEO's six and seven figure salaries but the person who works in the service sector has to take a pay cut?
Those of you who are against union's, keep it up. Your non-union job/salary/pensions will be the next to go. Soon some computer, robot, or younger person will replace you. Let's see how you live then once your SS has been cut, not Medicare or Medicaid, and your 401K tanks because Wall Street has decided it's easier to make money by driving down the cost of your portfolio.
Wake UP America. It's not too late to stop this madness.
Seriously! The first thing this corporate shill (Governor) did in office was give large corporations massive tax breaks. Why does this all sound familiar! According to several independent sources what had been essentially budget "neutrality" become a short fall!!! Guess who is making up the difference - working Americans. But that isn't the only reason why you will see this trend going Nation wide - the Republican's are going after the collective bargaining of "all" state and federal workers because they have traditionally supported the Democratic Party. This is POLITICS
dressed up as fiscal austerity (Carl Rove said as much - the only honest thing he has ever said)! Corporations will in the end be the only entities that benefit from Citizens United and armies of lobbyists. Wake up people - they will privatize everything including the police and the fire department. Your house will burn if you missed a payment and Black Water will be the local constabulary. You think I'm joking - when it is all done and said America will have the look and feel of a some science fiction movie where morally bankrupt and yes overtly evil corporations are the government and run everything! Oh, and they will throw the best of the 19th century into the mix for good measure - debtors prison, work houses, cities suffocating in pollution (see London Fog). Our economy was tanked by Republican deregulation and Corporate greed and now there using the outcome as a pretext for going after American workers and every aspect of a once great and progressive society!
mn-1062959...wrong. The cost of health insurance is out of the control of the employee or employer. If you spent as much time bitching about the consistent 7-8% increases in the costs of health care every year that you spend on the 1-2% increase in salaries, you would have more credibility.
Brilliant, brilliant, BRILLIANT... Precipitate the greatest recession in American History through deregulation. Fight a preemptive war (Daddy's war) without raising taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Give tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires and think the jobs are going to fall mana from heaven (didn't happen). Give tax breaks to corporations to send jobs overseas (sounds like treason to me.) Now wrap it all up in the American flag, show an American Eagle (do you hear the screech) and the best photo op of all history (Bush standing on top of the ruble of 9/11). And after all this you blame the tanked economy on working Americans! Brilliant!
Those of you who are against union's, keep it up. Your non-union job/salary/pensions will be the next to go. Soon some computer, robot, or younger person will replace you.
Yeah Tank, read part of it the first time you posted the same drivle and you should be happy they are offering tax incentives to companies...He's trying to get companies in Illinois an added reason to move to Wisconsin after Illinois raised all their taxes....More jobs for Wisconsinonians.....
Yes mike there are a lot of companies that run to low tax states to get their cheep labor from union busting governments. On the other hand there are companies who go to states where there is a stable tax base, where the workers are happy and the roads are fixed. Depends which kind of world you want to live in I guess.
And if you think GOP attacks on the working class family are great, you haven't seen anything yet. I'm sure you'll be happy when this new congress strips out everything from the budget and the job market tanks and more people will be out on the streets with no safety net. As long as you get yours.
Sven- I did a little research. It didn't take long to find an article that confirmed your Madison bus driver story...to a point.
What you failed to mention was that one of the chief reasons that Madison has bus drivers making over $100K is because they have a shortage of drivers due to a hiring freeze the city instituted last year, which resulted in excessive OT. Yes, the Teamster contract needs to be renegotiated, but that doesn't justify your misrepresentation of the facts.
Are you kidding me? Those of us in the private sector aren't getting ours - we've taken the cuts in pay and elimination of benefits. It's those in the public sector that are stomping their feet, giving us the finger. They don't give a crap about us. They don't care if we have to turn over more of OUR tax money so they can retire after 20 years with pensions and insurance.
The governor said if you do this I can avoid lay offs. He wants collective bargaining eliminated for benefits and pensions, NOT PAY. He wants to leave benefits and pension issues up to the voters - you know - the ones that pay for this. He also asked for a 8% increase in employee contribution on benefits. There are many people that would LOVE to have ONLY an 8% increase in their contribution to benefits and health care.
By the way - for all of the democrats who are holier than thou - did you see the signs with the picture of Gov Walker? The ones that show the CROSS-HAIR right between his eyes with the words DON'T RETREAT...RELOAD.
And if you think GOP attacks on the working class family are great, you haven't seen anything yet.
I keep hearing this broken record from the Liberal/Progressive Left. Here's something to put in your well used pipe and smoke. What is killing the working class family is the ever increasing taxes to pay for the non-producing parasitic state and local union workers. You think the real working class families in the private sector wouldn't love to have some of their hard earned money made from actually producing something of value back? I think if you take a poll a majority of Wisconsin "working class" residents would be in favor of this.
Dismantle the common sense regulations created at the end of the Great Depression. Give tax breaks to corporations to send their manufacturing and jobs overseas. Fight Daddy's War and not raise taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Precipitate the greatest recession in American History (then blame on the Democrats and home owners). Extend tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires in an economic downturn (lie about it creating jobs) and then BLAME THE VICTIMS. This is not about fiscal conservatism - this is all about politics. Republican want to destroy the right of collective bargaining so only corporations can benefit from Citizens United. BRILLIANT!!!
What you failed to mention was that one of the chief reasons that Madison has bus drivers making over $100K is because they have a shortage of drivers due to a hiring freeze the city instituted last year, which resulted in excessive OT. Yes, the Teamster contract needs to be renegotiated, but that doesn't justify your misrepresentation of the facts.
Sorry, the story I read was from over 5 years ago at least. Must still be going on. They must make excuses every year.
Used to be in union, made good money, too much money for what I was doing, union tried to screw company, company screwed back, closed plant, now make no money.
Sven: The Teamsters Union may be part of the problem, but the OT was also a problem 5 years ago. The city didn't want to hire new drivers because they felt the pay rate negotiated by the Teamsters was too high. By refusing to hire new workers, who would receive lower pay because of their lower seniority, they insured that the overtime that would be necessary to keep the buses running would be provided by the highest paid workers, since OT is made available based on seniority. That's what is known as cutting off your nose to spite your face. If the city would negotiate early retirement for some of the highest paid workers, and renegotiate the starting pay based on the current economy and the ready availability of workers willing to work at lower rates, it would be a win-win--more jobs, more employed people, less overtime. The problem is that the Republicans are so focussed on destroying the unions that they refuse to use logic.
we are glad Indiana is getting on board with ridding our nation of the government union crime syndicate ...it is a pox on the nation...thanks for pointing out some of the better stuff going on in our great nation
I worked as a union carpenter for about 30 years, some of that time I worked on a few non-union jobs. The union jobs were much better managed, had much safer working conditions, better tools and a better trained crew. On non-union jobs some days you took your life in your hands going to work.
I am married and have four daughters. My wife is a teacher, three of my daughters are teachers. They all have B. A. degrees, one has a masters, one will start a masters program this summer. They love teaching, and none of them went into it for the money.
This whole WI debacle is not about anything other than union busting. Once the unions aren't able to protect the workers rights, the corporations will destroy the American work force. How many jobs have been outsourced. The thing is, you pay $50 for an item made in America, the job is outsourced and made way cheaper, but you still pay $50 for the same item. Where do the savings and profits go, back to the corporations. Look at an old Carhartt catalog, then look at a new one. And now the Supreme's have giving the multi-national corporations the right to give boatloads of money to candidates they support, and with the weaken labor unions unable to balance the cash flow of the corporations we end up with a congress bought and paid for by Big Business, Big Oil and the Big Banks. Doom on the American working class. $700 billion for the top 2% of wealthy Americans, no new banking regulations, watered down stock market regulations. And it's all the Presidents fault, good luck America!!!
but barlow, anything good for big business is good forAmerica, the working people should be happy to make $3 an hour. only the rich CEOs and tv and radio mouthpieces (beck, rush, et al) should be permitted to tell people "how they should be happy to be good little slaves"
hey Dan...what about the liberal Hollywood "stars" and supposed "comediens" that are getting phat (I think that is what the kid's used to say) rich and running their yaps about your liberal views and agendas?...why are they exempt from your "wrath"?...because they spout the same lockstep "progressive" (communists in America used to call themselves progressives) diatribe and psycobabble that you believe?...just wondering...oh and did you know?:
"Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227)"
OTA, and how many of those Hollywood types are responsible for making the decision to ship American jobs overseas? (none) how many are responsible for the banking and housing debacle that started this depression? (none)
I have nothing against healthy rewards for CEOs that keep Americans employed and keep their company healthy, (doing their job like they're supposed to) but far too many are getting rewarded richly for screwing Americans, even getting huge bonuses when the companys financiials get worse.
how is forcing currently middle-class Americans to work for $3 an hour good for America? (it isn't unless you happen to already be rich)
gee R.L. you seem to have conveniently forgotten who controlled both houses of Congress when Glass Steagal was repealed. you do know that Congress writes the laws? and enough blue dog dems were on board to override any veto.
and Clinton got caught getting a BJ, BFD
oohhh, he lied about it. I couldn't care less about any president's sex life as long as he does the job, but stupid people want to make a big deal out of private, personal matters.
and Bush and Cheney lied about WMDs in Iraq, Which cost more for the taxpayers and in lives lost? (no brainer question there) unless you are another mindless demagogue
Bush destroyed the economy, drove up oil from $15 a barrel to $120 cut taxes while blowing a trillion dollars on war, (unheard of in all US history, an unfunded war, what was that about 'fiscal responsibility'?LOL) created the largest, most expensive and most personally intrusive bureaucracy in all of American History "Homeland Insecurity". and you are whining like a complete imbecile about Clinton's sex life.
you keep going on about clinton and glass steagall. who introduced the bill to repeal?
hint, both were republicans, one was phill gramm, the other was jim leach
who controlled both houses? oh, yeah, republicans.
what is so funny, is that when the republicans controlled both houses, everything bad was clintons fault, when bush and the republicans controlled executive and legislative branches for six years, everything bad was clintons fault, suddenly when the house and senate,fall under the control of democrats, magically the house and senate are rsponsible for everything bad, and not your golden boy bot bush. face it, bush failed, he lied, and he was responsible for far more deaths. and far more jobs lost than clinton ever was
the minimum wage in America is 7.25 an hour...let me know if I need to send you a calculator and instructions on "searching" out that type of info...because I will help out
OTA, sorry, I make considerably more than that, and between rent, gas, food, and minimal insurance, there isn't a lot left.
do you really think you could live on 7.25 an hour on your own? I don't know how I could if I only made that much. a 1 bedroom apt in my area is $800 a month. and rents go up when housing falls (in case you weren't aware of that little fact). your 7.25 an hour comes to 1256 a month before taxes. how is anyone going to pay rent, gas, utilities, food, and insurance on that?
yet the brilliant conservatives want to cut that wage down, and say that the rising rents, prices, insurance, etc, are "good for the economy". only good for a few
"One of the biggest opponents of the federal minimum wage in Samoa is StarKist Tuna, which owns one of the two packing plants that together employ more than 5,000 Samoans, or nearly 75 percent of the island’s work force. StarKist’s parent company, Del Monte Corp., has headquarters in San Francisco, which is represented by Mrs. Pelosi. The other plant belongs to California-based Chicken of the Sea."
last I checked Hollywood is in Mexifornia ,so i am sure Hollywood losers have been in conversation with Stuplousy
oh, and you said: "how is forcing currently middle-class Americans to work for $3 an hour good for America?"
I said :the minimum wage in America is 7.25 an hour:...what does your last bit of drivel have to do with your comment getting pimp slapped to the ground?...not much really
I made less than that at times and survived on my own since I left home at the age of seventeen...never had to move back either
and how long ago was that?
you have noticed that rent, mortgages, fuel, food, insurance, etc. are a lot more than they were "way back when"
notice that all the things that you actually need to survive (housing, food, fuel) are conveniently excluded from the so-called "inflation rate"?
I said :the minimum wage in America is 7.25 an hour:...what does your last bit of drivel have to do with your comment getting pimp slapped to the ground?...
Public Service workers are asked to do more for less pay. And instead of rewarding them with collectively bargained rights, the State has decided to strip them of their rights to score cheap political points. Will is save some money over the next few years? Sure will. But will it come at the expense of people's lives? Sure will. And could this money have been 'found' in other ways? Sure could have been. But why talk about taxes for the richest, when you can just blame Unions?
They were supposed to do more with less pay years ago, now they do less with more pay.
At the expense of peoples lives????? A little melodramatic, don't you think?
Yes, according to liberals there is always money to be found at the expense of the tax base. No amount of spending is too much, particularly when a big portion goes right into democrat coffers.
Tax payers have had it. They voted their wallets and the last polll I saw showed 80% support for what the Governor is doing. The gravy train has been derailed, get over it.
You're right Valhalla - they will get to keep their lives. They just won't have a place to live, or be able to put food on the table, or be able to send their own children to college. But they will be alive, so the misery part doesn't matter I am sure....
Both sides are missing the point. All this will blow by within a year or two. In the short term, budget will be more balanced but bears little impact on the root of our economic woes - Greed is Good. As long as we continue to value 'me first' philosophy on both ends of the political spectrum, we can expect more bitter fights in the days ahead.
Working for the state is a cush job anyway you look at it. It's a good job. The problems that are seen daily show this to be true. Millions of people would love to have a job working for the state. As a Democrat I agree with this legislation. It's a cut, and a warning. We have all seen the three guys holding up that one shovel making good money and as we drive by we say,"That's just wrong." I see the point... Now fair is fair...
How much could be saved if every state and federal employee took a 10% cut in pay, including all Representatives, senators, gov's, and to include the White House? After all, fair is fair. Let's dig into some of those federal, and state pensions and see what all states and the fed could do with that extra tax payer dollar. I wonder how much money that is, and what could be created from that?
Riiight...
Would that be considered class warfare, socialism, capitolism killing? Are we there yet?
This isn't union busting. This is just the right thing to do. After all you voted for this Gov. and he is doing something. Now let's ask him to cut his own pay by the same to show how dedicated he is and trickle it down through the state to all fed and state employees. Then your state troubles are gone and you have a surplus, and I might vote republican next time.
All the States do this and bada-bing,.... What deficit?????? Private sector.. untouched.
Headlines; Government problem solved by Government. Yea.. riiight.....
Right on. It is amazing where you can find fat to cut. Phoenix for example spends 1.1 Million dollars a year on a stupid public access station that no one watches, which provides the same info that can be found on the city's website. There are a total of 11 employees who make between $70k - $95k in base salary and they only produce 300 hours of programming per year. Compared to other cities like Tempe who spend only a quarter of that budget and produce twice the amount of programs. Cutting funding or completely eliminating something like this would affect less than 20 people and put over $2M annually back into our city's budget. I wonder what other frivolous or redundant programs we can find?
Meanwhile the gov't is making pay cuts, cutting jobs and raising taxes while making the ridiculous statement that there is nothing else they can do to avoid this.
and to those who would say no now... there are millions qualified who would say yes to 35k a year now, so take what is offered and keep your job if you can, or those who are not working will say yes.
"raping taxpayers" is borrowing money from the chineese to give to big oil, farmers, and the rich. my wife teaches in a school district west of chicago and she makes $17 an hour- big whoop. she cant retire in 20 years at 80% - $15 and hour/$600 a week- another lie.
"WE ARE MADDER THAN HELL AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE"
Yes, the public sector gravey train where you get pennies on the dollar that the private sector employee makes. I love how every few years someone gets the idea to run govt jobs more like a business, but they don't give their employees the perks that businesses get. It just means they want to trim the employee's wages or the number of people in the office.
This would seem more genuine if they were looking at the top earners in the US. Instead of trying to fix the broken economy on the backs of the working class. Why is it the rich don't have any skin in this game?
Of course they would. They also think teachers get to retire at age 50 on 80% of their salary with FULL medical benefits. Before some of these people post comments they should do some research! Thank you.
"Public employees have never been asked to work harder. I've worked in both sectors."
So have I. In the past two years of my eight years in a public sector job, working to serve the public in a small rural community, I have seen the demand for our services skyrocket, while positions are being eliminated and those who survive to fight another day are stretched to the max -- also while our benefits are being stripped, and our new GOP governor (thanks to the Koch Brothers), is also blaming public employees and doing his best to bust the unions. I have never worked so hard in my life, and if I didn't truly love public service, I would flee. So, Sweet Baby James, shove it. I will continue to help the people who walk through my door until they close me down, which is actually pretty likely in the next 6 months, and then I will find some way to volunteer my services to my struggling community for free. Because someone has to give a damn about the real people in our communities -- and it ain't the GOP.
What is it you aren't seeing? These people work hard at jobs for 30 years. They are the ones that help YOU find jobs, some of them. When the DETR is closed down, where will you go then? Why do you hate the working people who live in your community, pay taxes AND for the goods and services that keep businesses open? What earthly use is it to destroy your own state and local economies just to make a point about unions?
The last private sector job I held, after 7 years (with no benefits), was called up & told it was my last day, nothing wrong with my work, they were cutting the department out to save money. Just a "business decision." Sweet Baby James -- you're so wrong in so many ways for such a short post.
I've got an idea. What we should do is make being a state worker and entry level job at minimum wage. From there you go into the private sector and start your career. That way we won't have these permanent slugs growing fat and unhealthy while they sit around waiting to retire so they can drink full time.
For those complaining about $35,000, consider that teachers must have a least a bachelor's degree. Couple that with the professional development requirement that teachers must meet. Then add in the cost of initial certification and certification renewal. Next, while teachers don't teach during the summer, consider the number of hours that they work during the school year. Believe me, it is much more than 40 hours per week.
I used to be employed for an oil company as a systems analyst. Therefore, I was a non-union employee. However, the benefits we received, as non-union employees, were made possible the the union employees.
Let's take all of the assets from the rich. We can split it up between all 50 states and the federal government. We will have eliminated the evil rich and just like the democrats keep telling us everything will then be fine.
until the bills comes due next month, or the month after that, or the month after that.
Teachers don't have job security either. They are getting lay off notices every year. If you are not laid off, consider yourself as having won the lottery. My husband is a high school teacher and I can tell you that you are misinformed if you think his job is cush. Most of you leave your jobs at the office. When he gets home he has phone calls to parents, papers to grade and planning for the upcoming lessons. Not to mention the afterschool activities/ tutoring he oversees. He also takes part of his salary and pays for science labs and general classrooms supplies. The attitude this country has taken towards teachers makes me sick. It is no wonder our children are failing. How do you educate a child when education and educators are not respected in the home? Everyone is so quick to pass the blame on to teachers... look in the mirror parents!
Why is it that the public says that it's alright for the market to pay CEO's six and seven figure salaries but the person who works in the service sector has to take a pay cut?
Because I can chose to support the CEO's salary by using his company's products or not. My only option here is to move to a state with no state income taxes and they aren't doing so well at the moment either.
I worked as a union carpenter for about 30 years, some of that time I worked on a few non-union jobs. The union jobs were much better managed, had much safer working conditions, better tools and a better trained crew. On non-union jobs some days you took your life in your hands going to work.
I am married and have four daughters. My wife is a teacher, three of my daughters are teachers. They all have B. A. degrees, one has a masters, one will start a masters program this summer. They love teaching, and none of them went into it for the money.
This whole WI debacle is not about anything other than union busting. Once the unions aren't able to protect the workers rights, the corporations will destroy the American work force. How many jobs have been outsourced. The thing is, you pay $50 for an item made in America, the job is outsourced and made way cheaper, but you still pay $50 for the same item. Where do the savings and profits go, back to the corporations. Look at an old Carhartt catalog, then look at a new one. And now the Supreme's have giving the multi-national corporations the right to give boatloads of money to candidates they support, and with the weaken labor unions unable to balance the cash flow of the corporations we end up with a congress bought and paid for by Big Business, Big Oil and the Big Banks. Doom on the American working class. $700 billion for the top 2% of wealthy Americans, no new banking regulations, watered down stock market regulations. And it's all the Presidents fault, good luck America!!!
I agree with you. My dad, my aunts, my sister, a lot of my family are teachers. It amazes me when I was young what I had to go without because of the teacher's pay. like you said, they have to go to college and $35,000.00 a year is nothing, they have loans to pay back. I listened to the Morning Joe show and all he kept saying is, "the teachers are out of work today, this doesn't look good, they just don't want to pay what the rest of the country is paying for medical benefits." I think he missed it buy a long shot, the teachers recognize they are trying to break the Union and that is the main reason they went on strike. If the governor wants to change the percentage paid by the state workers, approach the unions and discuss what needs to be done. People keep saying that state workers and teachers have easy jobs, wow. I've worked in both and they are both hard, but the ones with a union treats me better, makes things more fair. I understand we have to make sacrifices in this economic time that we are in, but, I find it very odd that you don't ask the CEO's and the rich to do the same. Look at what one bank CEO, whose bank went under and he lied to the people over the pension funds, saying everything is ok, but he really knew it wasn't. The bank fell and he escaped with $529,000,000.00 US dollars. The republicans are looking out for their pay day and their family, but truly no one else. Teachers don't make enough to effect any state economy, if any of you think and that it is an easy job become a teacher. How many teachers could be paid with that CEO's money he blackmailed the people out of? How many oil companies, bankers, and Wall Street people are backing the republicans. Maybe that's why we go after the poorest first and a lot of people who don't know just say the same thing that their leaders say. You know how much taxes some of these companies pay? zero. We could easily fix this problem but the republicans don't want to touch the rich's money, all we have to do is have a flat rate tax and in a few years you will see the deficit go away. But, everybody would have to pay it and every coporation would also. I don't want to work for a CEO, when the company is about to go out of business they turn and lie, get close to a billion dollars, already making millions a year, and walks out without paying any of the hard working employees. This is what happens when you don't have a Union. From what I am hearing a lot of you say is, when you don't have a Union you are worked like slaves and paid pennies on the dollar for some one at the top who probably makes millions already, by playing golf and flying on jets and is not a professional golfer or pilot. I wonder who helped them get a job, answer, A Teacher. Dealing with some of these kids today, you say teachers have a cush job? Well that's what CEO's and republicans like, so, lets make them teachers, oh, and they don't like government paying for medical benefits, they say anything the government does they do a bad job at, they should give up their medical benefits, state and federal repubs, put that money in a fund and start taking down some of the national debt. I'm for sacrifice for this country, but lets make sure it reaches all the way to the top.
I agree with both posts BUT NOT that it is the POTUS fault. Everyone loves to blame Obama for EVERYTHING. He cannot be held responsible for a governor held bent on UNION BUSTING.And you can thank the GOP, the TP and the Koch brothers for that!!! Thank you.
of course ,after 4 years of PROGRESSIVE ,Bush/Cheney ,started the crusades....... Our PROGRESSIVE comrades ,have ALL SORTS of credibility ,when it comes to the blame game !
Hopefully Wisconsin is the first of many states. My husband is in the union (forced) and I am not. We both know how it works - the union is nothing but legalized mafia and it is destroying our cities and towns. There was a time and place for the union, but it's time is long over!
Yeah, well when your corporate masters decide that you need to work 60 hours a week not 40 and for minimum wage without benefits, who the hell is going to help you fight their profit over people mentality. I sure won't because you are asking for it.
Yeah, well when your corporate masters decide that you need to work 60 hours a week not 40 and for minimum wage without benefits, who the hell is going to help you fight their profit over people mentality. I sure won't because you are asking for it.
Fyi, there are already laws against that. Any more than 40 hours/week to non-exempt employees is required to be paid time and 1/2 by federal law.
I've worked for corporations all my life. Thanks to them and judicious personal economic decisions, I was able to retire comfortably at 55. On the other hand I have gotten nothing but $hit from unions.
I have worked 60, 70 sometimes 80 hours a week. It's initiative like that that always kept me employed and able to retire at 55. If you think they are making so much money buy their stock. Participate in their success.
Only 7% of the workforce is unionized, yet they are the source of all trouble. Anybody who has had to deal with them loathes them.
You beat me to it, FMC....this is just the beginning of Big Business improving its chokehold on American workers. First came the extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and increases in corporate tax breaks. Then comes the slow but sure elimination of unionized labor, making it impossible for the lowly employee to fight unfair labor practices. Soon, the deregulation of corporations will begin, letting them loose upon the working class and pretty much saying to them "the government says we can pretty much make you do anything we want, at any pay grade we choose, for as long a week as we want you to work, and you have squat to say about it!! HAR-HAR-HARRRR!!"
The cons will tell you that if you don't like it, go work elsewhere! But, with every business, from Wal-Mart to Joe's Burger's on the corner, doing the exact same thing of abusive business practices, where do you think we'll be able to work? Just another way the middle class, as we know it, will be eliminated by the wealthy. They don't even have a clue that it's the middle class that makes them wealthy in the first place, and that its elimination would be shooting the goose that laid the golden egg.
Yeah, well when your corporate masters decide that you need to work 60 hours a week not 40 and for minimum wage without benefits, who the hell is going to help you fight their profit over people mentality. I sure won't because you are asking for it.
Thats easy... I will be fighting for myself and looking for another job in my field. Since I am not a burger flipper or customer service person at the local walmart.. I have skills that are in high demand ( even in this economy ) and can go elsewhere.
Unions did this to themselves. They were all for "Wage Hike or Strike" in the good times, but when times got tough did they learn any lessons? Did they say "Maybe we should give some of this back to protect our jobs?" The answer is no, they just continued to say "Wage Hike or Strike". The same thing is still happening at GM. Now that it looks like the company has a chance of survival (Bankruptcy, Bond Defaults, and the American Taxpayer being saddled with their pension responsibilities), the unions are saying again that "we want to get back anything we gave away from 2005 to the present and More because we deserve it." If they do that, then the company will be bankrupt again in 5 years. But that's OK, the company will get another bailout because "they are too big to fail."
If you want to share in the profits, you have to share in the pain too. But, the unions have never been willing to do that. But then you turn around and whine about why there isn't any manufacturing left in the US because no one can afford to hire you to do a job and turn a profit with all of the rules in your contract. You can't have it both ways; pick one or try compromising a little.
FYI, If our current Republican legislature has their way, the laws to which you refer will also be a thing of the past. Yes, we have a Democratic Majority in the Senate to put the breaks on that but for how long?
Look at the big picture. They will continue to whittle away at workers rights until there are none.
We are at war and the enemy lives among us. The rich are attempting to lower our standard of living to better compete with countries like Chine, where people work 12 hour days, six days per week and live in 600 sq. ft. concrete apartments costing several million dollars.
The people who are doing this are nothing more than paid prostitutes to human garbage and criminals. They hide behind the title conservative or republican.
When that needed ambulance or fire truck takes a few minutes longer to get to you, remember why. As our population grows, so does the need for government to grow. What stands between you and the large multi-billion dollar corporation that just raped you of your retirement and career? Only a democraticly run government.
Throw these people out of office and start taking responsibility for our government and how it's run. Do it now before it's too late.
[Fyi, there are already laws against that. Any more than 40 hours/week to non-exempt employees is required to be paid time and 1/2 by federal law.]
That may very well be true, but if you are a SALARIED EMPLOYEE, you better damned well be prepared to work that 60 hour week.
And this is the very reason how companies are going to get around that little pesky federal law regarding "time and a half after 40 hours" dealie.
Wisconsin is making a HUGE mistake, and those that are all orgasmic about this labor setback are going to get a dose of reality. You're jumping on the bandwagon and you don't realize there is no driver.
the benefits and wages that workers enjoy come from negotiated contracts...unions are needed to give workers a voice....health benefits....working conditions....wages are all negotiated...do you really think that if there were no unions that workers would have the life that they have....
we would go back to the slave wages of the past...and working conditions would sorely suffer..
Many of the so-called cuts by the Republicans show their anti-worker stance...starting with Boehner...declaring that if govenment workers lose their jobs so be it...
why is the republican party waging war against workers and workers rights...
Check the benefits of those non-Union workers who work in the same profession as your husband. Just go check ALL the benefits. You'll see that your husband, who is forced to enjoy more being "forced union ", then what he will get being non-union.
Understandable if he just wants to be the 'yes boss' to management when he is told to go clean the toilet when his profession is machinist.
Amen to that. The Unions are a large reason why the country is in the lousy shape it is currently in. Consistently lobbying for more and more when times dictated that the status quo could not be sustained. It comes down to a matter of survival for companies, governments and the like. The options are reduce salary and benefits, or lose a job entirely. These are tough choices that the whole country will soon be making, wisconsin is just on the cutting edge. Now if NY and California would follow suit, debt could start to be paid down. But i'm talking about the two biggest Liberal dominated welfare states in the country so i more or less expect a bailout for them. everyone should take a hard look at the austerity measures Greece and Ireland have been forced to implement, it is coming here to roost soon. In a country of Multi-millionaire athletes and movie stars down to Garbage men who make $20 plus an hour, it is just too much to sustain. The country needs to hit the reset button on salaries across the board. The first step in that is getting rid of the corrupt unions. They are too political and too powerful and no pols want to say no to them due to their voting blocs. The unions should read the tea leaves and strike the best deal the can while it is still manageable to get a decent contract.
Remember union or not union all have gained huge from the unions, over time , job saftey, the 8 hour work day, all have happend over many years do to the unions. If the unions go away all wages will go down, and as in every thing that has been happening the middle class will be the one to loose, the gap will get wider the avarage worker will have no more pention and we can all look forward to working till we are 70. Union or non union we need them.
Baloney! Listen to Faux news much? Only 7% is unionized because of the constant attack by RepubliCorp's and their puppet masters, aka the Multi-National Corporapists. You do realize that without Unions fighting for fair wages, affordable benefits and safe work places that non-union counterparts wouldn't have them either? Why is that so hard to comprehend? Why does every other Progressive country in the world have a massive Unionized workforce and they are doing just fine?
Again, these anti-union folks who hate a worker having a contract, do you even realize that EVERY single Exec. of these Corporations have GUARANTEED contracts no matter what state the business is in? They are GUARANTEED their Million$ no matter what...benefits - no worries, retirement...golden parachutes. So let me understand why it's OK for all the Execs to have contracts but the workers who make the business run cannot?
Next is no minimum wage, no benefits, no SS until you're on your death-bed if ever...better be able to work until you're 80!
Yes, there are laws that require overtime pay. There are laws that require employers to pay at least a minimum wage. And there are laws that prohibit child labor.
Who advocated for these laws? Liberals and labor unions, that's who. Now if you take away the unions' right to negotiate, then you basically render them powerless.
Once that happens, you'll see a number of things. You'll see wages go down in this country. You'll see efforts to undo the laws requiring overtime pay, and to undo the laws requiring a minimum wage, and to undo the laws prohibiting child labor. You'll see the middle class disappear, and you'll see a very poor country ruled by a small monied elite.
Be careful what you wish for. We just might get it.
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - BLAME THE VICTIM! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
"This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans)"
What tripe. The Republicans weren't in power in Wisconsin until this last mid-term election. Keep blaming the party that WASN'T in power in Wisconsin as this problem steadily built up. Blame the folks trying to fix the problems the Democrats, and the unions they are beholden to, created in the state of Wisconsin.
The very actions of these public worker unions demonstrate to all taxpayers that these groups have been granted too much power, at the expense of the taxpayer, and that they need to be pulled up short before they bankrupt Wisconsin and numerous other states.
Collective bargaining isn't worth a damn, if the state has no money left to pay the workers with.
Both of my parents were forced-union teachers here in Michigan. They hated it. Yard signs were always given out for the democratic candidate only. It's basically a huge political entity. Heck, if I had a union giving me tenure and top notch health benefits plus pension, I'd be mad to see it go! But really, these unions are keeping bad teachers around. So many just want to go for a free ride on the union express. It has no place in education.
yes, it is despicable that people are forced into unions and made to take the benefits and wage increases that come with it. It is also horrible that unions advocate for the party that is trying to help the working class of this country. Forced yard signs indeed! We should be able to vote for who ever is taking the most rights away from the common man when ever we can!
Only 7% of the workforce is unionized, yet they are the source of all trouble. Anybody who has had to deal with them loathes them.
Yes, I'm sure the budget shortfall that state is dealing with is entirely because of the unions. The unions caused the recession and the unions caused the housing bubble, not Wall Street or the banks or loaning money to people who couldn't afford them.
You see the corporations are the real victims here, those fatcat teachers unions really screwed them over.
Well it seems Wisconsin is not only full of cows, it's also full of REPUBLICAN IDIOTS! Unions back in the 20"s and 30's were run by the mafia, that is not representative of todays unions. They are middle class hard working people, I believe they should share the responsiblity of their insurance and things of that nature but not being able to collectively bargain is COMMUNISM!!!!!!!!! You republican morons and fat cats judge other people from your own stereotyping! I noticed that noone mentioned that your legislators and Govenor get ot keep the insurance they have at no cost to them but to you the taxpayer, they keep giving themselves raises each year! But thats OK with the rightwing front, it's pretty apparent all republicans are the same, a bunch of blind, obedient to the fat cat, lemmings! Lets put this in terms you idiots can understand, your college basketball coach (a state employee) is paid 3x's that of a school teacher in your state! Get your head out of your a****!!!!!!!!
sir kingsley, are you saying that both your parents were bad teachers kept around by the union? And forced? Really? Someone held a gun to their head and FORCED them to be in the union? I like how you people try and claim it's forced. Unless someone held a gun to your head and held you hostage and physically forced you to work as a union employee then no, you were not forced at all. You willingly joined but claim you were forced because you don't want to admit that you ARE what you rail against. And before you start with the "I had join to keep my job" whining, you could have always found another NON UNION job. So, try again hypocrites.
But why talk about taxes for the richest, when you can just blame Unions?
Typical liberal brainwashing “just make the rich pay more, they can afford it” What the hell ever happened to fairness in this country? The top 20% already pay 80%. Are you really so greedy Inni that you don’t thing the rest of us, the other 80% can chip in just 1/5. Why don’t you brain dead liberals understand that you can only ask so much of the wealthy before they say screw this and move out of the country. Look what happened when NY tried to raise the taxes for the wealthy; half of them had homes in other states already so they just spend 51% of their time there now resulting in a net lose for the state and a larger tax burden on the middle class.
I was the secretary-treasurer of local---U.F.W.A. for 14 years and when the company said they could not compete any more and were folding the union took all monies and everything we had and it went to the international headquarters and that was that total time there was 17 years and this was back in early 80' we learned Unions are only out for their selves and could care less about the people.
@Shellie, if one wants to be a teacher (at least in MI) they must join the union. No choice. You're saying someone should choose a different profession if they don't agree with being forced to join an organization that takes money from their paycheck to donate to political purposes? Just because someone wants to enrich children's lives through education doesn't mean they necessarily want to contribute to the democratic party. The teachers who are in love with the union are the ones who want a free lunch, to sit back and do the bare minimum while enjoying job security and benefits. The GOOD teachers don't care if there is tenure or not, since they know their jobs are secure based on good performance.
Work in non union jobs and work in union jobs. You will see the difference. I did when I got out of the Army. My first job was stocking shelves in a grocery store that was non union. We were expected to work our hours, have a slip if we had to call in due to illness, and expected to produce (in this situation you had to stock 50 cases of product an hour) or you were fired. I made $8.50 an hour and had the ability to buy health insurance and invest into their retirement fund. I left there and then went to work in a local UFWA store. I made $9.00 an hour (it actually was about $7.50 an hour after dues each week). Watched as people weren't actually required to work but got paid for it anyways. Watched the union protect the people that didn't work, and watched them tell me I have to vote democrat. Last I knew it was against the law for someone to tell someone else how they HAVE to vote. Not for the unions.
Unions started off great then they decided that money was more important then making sure the business succeeds so their workers have a place to make money. I am all for this Governor to go through and smack around the public unions a tad with this. The heads of the unions are just as corrupt as the heads of the corporations and banks that people like to scream and yell about.
If you support the union or not what does it matter in this case.
The bottom line is we pay these elected officials to go to work and work on the problems facing America. We don't pay them to not show up for a vote and call it a "protest". Take your lazy and apparently elected for no good reason butt to work and vote like you are elected to do.
Wisconsin please take note of the people who did not show up and make sure they never work in the public sector ever again.
I had a similar experience. The only difference is the company I worked for was non-union. We made good money had profit sharing at the end of the year, and a great client base.
We were then forced into a union "if" we wanted to keep our jobs. Nobody wanted it but the union made it so our boss would have to close the business if we didn't. Didn't take long before we had to raise our prices because the business could not run as efficiently as a result of the bloated contract the union brought with it.
We all made less money every single one of us. On top of it we had to charge our clients 30% more for the same service we provided before. Needless to say the business eventually failed. The union will always be happier seeing a business fail instead of being non union. The union is actually not very interested in keeping people working they are interested in getting Democrats elected.
I've worked both sides, after 9/11 crushed my company, I took a (non-union) government job, and it was pretty good, as long as you didn't mind three levels of bureaucratic ass to kiss and a cast-iron management ceiling only the 'Good Old Boys' got 'selected' into, ...how it that different from Corporate?
Then the union basically just forced our agency to join the PERS, and siht flew everywhere, they were just stealing our dues, and screwing low-seniority's out of COLAs as their 'concessions' to budget cut efforts. It got so siloed up, that nothing was getting done! 95% of capital building funds were 'studied' over into operating side, to allow the GOBs massive overtime pay, until nobody would let go their little turf. It just got nasty.
I leapfrogged from there to above the glass-ceiling in Corporate, enjoying total freedom and signing authority (and 100 hour weeks on salary) but had a car, a phone, perks and even cute secretary-receptionists (sorry). The only flaw with that 'paradise' was 2008, the ownership waited only 30 days to sihtcan the office down to the accountants and water coolers, no prisoners.
So that sucked. Have been working graveyard 3rd-tier sub-contractor jobs on a 'take it or leave it', on-call, no salary, no benefits, no healthcare and no pension, at a wage I was making (and I checked) 25 years ago! And they are holding $5 of that back as a 'year end bonus'. Well, then it's NOT A BONUS!
Face it, ...all out LOOTING by Mercenaries and Usurists literally TRILLIONS a year from Defense and Wall Street and Fed is bleeding out our country, and we are just rearranging the Chinese deck chairs to play 1000 points of light shuffleboard for lifeboat seats, by fighting between union and 'right to work'.
If you can lock in either enough savings or a guaranteed pension and retire, instead of working until you fall over, well then, good for you, salary man or wage worker, union drone Mil.Gov, or on-commission Corporate High-Flyer.
Nobody gets out of life alive, at least we should be allowed to live some of it, I mean, Juno Hilo Charlie, even livestock have housing, food and healthcare!
Poor Woman! Once the Unions are gone you will have only Walmart like conditions, low wages, poor benefits and companies that run only their profits. We need unions more than ever because Capitalism has not worked as we all have experienced. The uncontrolled corporations and bank with their billions that they can throw at the legislature will put this country back and I sometimes think they would even let children work again in mines. The Enrons, Worldcom, BP have shown us that they are criminal entities shifting their money to China if they want and give the stick to the workers. Life is not cheap in this country and those Republicans should be stripped of their state benefits which the so decry.
Britaboo, I appreciate your honesty and forthrightness, and I agree with you. Unions today are just more mafia to deal with.
Dear Joachim, though your name sounds Jewish, I'd say by your comments that you are not. "...because Capitalism has not worked as we all have experienced." Are you nuts? Are you a brainless lunatic? It's capitalism that propelled this country economically above the rest. Was it communism? Did you just get off the boat?!
Your comments are so daft that there is no possible way that you have ever read a single history book or studied anything in school. Did you even graduate from high school?
Then you said, "Republicans should be stripped of their state benefits which the so decry." Hello? Do you know anything about the lower socio-economic strata in this country? You think they're Republicans??!!! You don't know spit. They are predominantly Democrats!!!
"...and companies that run only their profits." What exactly does THAT mean? If you're trying to condemn companies for making a profit and being concerned about that, then here is anothe example that something is wrong with your upstairs. The only reason to do business is to make a profit. Do you think people start businesses and work their butts off just for the fun of it? Just because they need something to keep them busy?
Unions are a big part of the reason GM failed and was restructured. Government assistance was needed to persuade the UAW to finally restructure it's contract.
I have lived in Detroit forever. Family members worked in both management and the union. The family member that worked in the union was the one who always referred to it as legalized extortion. You were expected to vote they way you were instructed on everything.
Union members for the big 3 never had a problem collecting five to ten thousand dollar bonuses in the late 90's when business was booming. Money given to them by the companies not the union. They demanded raises even when the company was losing money. And if they didn't agree it was going to cost them even more money now because we are going to strike.
Now most Union members would tell you who cares they owe me I work everyday. True but so did my other family member at GM who was not in the union. My union relative realized that the big 3 had a lot more employees than just it's union members and they had those employees to worry about to. Both of them predicted what happened long before it did. They both knew the companies were not cost effective anymore.
Honestly don't feel sorry for anyone who worked for the big 3. Union or not they both made a lot of money. Too much money that coupled with greed on both sides of the fence and you see why they fell behind foreign companies.
Boy I had to scroll down a hundred comments, however I now have the floor - if it wasn't for the unions you're children will be on the floors of child labor, if it wasn't for the unions you would not have a forty work week and a break for lunch, if it was not for the unions you would not have a voice in arbritation - on how you are are being treated - I was an Union representative when 3M denied me the right to become with a college degree to be part of their elite guys net work
OK if we destroy the middle class we destroy the fiber of America - is that what you want?
Do you truly want to become a third world America? Think about it - what is happening in Wisconsin is the fight for middle America, your neighbors, your neighbors children do you want Egypt, and all those countries or do you want America - answer this question - what do you want America to look like - a land of opportunity or one owned by the Koch Brothers?
Those points are vary valid. There was a purpose for unions at one time. Those days are long gone. Unions have turned into a safe haven for corruption and lethargy.
How is an organization that can be taken over by the mafia and exploits it's own union members and the company they work for good for anyone?
How is an organization that fights to pay their worst worker that nobody wants to work with, as much as the most productive worker? It kills the idea of working hard to get ahead. That is why I say it promotes a lethargic mentality.
How is an organization that doesn't do anything to promote business good? They promote the idea of shutting a business down if they don't comply with demands. They don't go out and look for work for the companies that employ their members. They go out after all the work is done and put up a dumb sign that says "Brought to you by your local UAW" That same sign is responsible for the higher cost of completing that project as opposed to a non union company with happier workers who take more of their check home.
I truly don't think it would make America a third world nation. I actually believe it would open the door for more productive workers who want to work and not deal with union. A huge majority of our population want nothing to do with unions.
Are you sick of high paid teachers? Teachers’ hefty salaries are driving up taxes, and they only work 9 or 10 months a year! It’s time we put things in perspective and pay them for what they do - baby sit (or all you think we do)! We can get that for less than minimum wage. That’s right. Let’s give them $3.00 an hour and only the hours they worked; not any of that silly planning time, or any time they spend before or after school. That would be $19.50 a day (7:45 to 3:00 PM with 45 min. off for lunch and plan — that equals 6 1/2 hours). Each parent should pay $19.50 a day for these teachers to baby-sit their children. Now how many do they teach in day…maybe 30? So that’s $19.50 x 30 = $585.00 a day. However, remember they only work 180 days a year!!! I am not going to pay them for any vacations.
LET’S SEE…. That’s $585 X 180= $105,300 peryear. (Hold on! My calculator needs new batteries).
What about those special education teachers and the ones with Master’s degrees? Well, we could pay them minimum wage ($7.75), and just to be fair, round it off to $8.00 an hour. That would be $8 X 6 1/2 hours X 30 children X 180 days = $280,800 per year.
Wait a minute — there’s something wrong here! There sure is!
The average teacher’s salary (nation wide) is $50,000. $50,000/180 days = $277.77/per day/30 students=$9.25/6.5 hours = $1.42 per hour per student–a very inexpensive baby-sitter and they even EDUCATE your kids!)
WHAT A DEAL!!!!
It sure does put things into perspective…What you think?
I would rather have a system like you mention. Where I choose where my children go to school and pay for it. Not having to pay for it through my property tax would be great. Oh yeah private schools, but I still get to pay for it in my taxes. I am not against teachers I am against the union and the system that skims so much tax payer money it is ridiculous.
Even paying for it through taxes was nice back before school of choice. The public school system ran based on where parents decided to spend their money. Now you can live in a city pay hardly any taxes for education and send your kids to another district.
I know several teachers who wish they did not have to be in a union. I also know teachers who do make over $100,000 a year but they are in the private sector where there are way less middle men taking money out of teachers pockets.
So the teachers from several schools decided that they were't going to go teach, but go bitch about their rights to have a union? So what do they need a union for? Well i'll tell you what they need a union for. When the teacher doesn't have enough money for a bigger house they STRIKE for more money. When the teacher doesn't have enough money to pay for two car payments, they STRIKE. When a teacher doesn't have enough money to go on a carribean cruise liner, they STRIKE. When a teacher gets caught slapping a kid around, and then gets fired for it, the UNION steps in to get that teachers job back or force the school to pay millions in restitution.
Unions have gotten out of hand for the last 40 so odd years, to the point that they are run by criminal orginizations. The only reason people complain that they don't have enough money to spend that are part of unions, is because they give all their damn money to the unions. All they have to do is quit those unions and stop paying them, and then they will have more money to spend.
Still, that's how the car dealerships in Detroit fell apart. The line workers kept striking and kept demanding more and more and more, until there was no more to give. And then bankruptcy. And that my friends was a joy to watch. All those car manufacturers saying, guess what, can't pay you no more and can't afford to stay in business, so we're going to fire some of you. And what did the workers do? They decided to go to their union, union said strike, and that's what the workers did. Said, your not going to fire anyone, either you keep everyone, or we don't go back to work....
...and you wonder why people lost jobs in the manufacturing arena, and the education arena? Bunch of idiots and fools. Being part of a Union does not mean you get more rights. Means your on the fast track to losing your job, and earning any sort of money...and ever getting a job in another business. Especially when that other job starts asking questions of how you LOST your last job.
How is it you think teachers are spoiled? You have no idea of all the responsibilities involved! I've been a teacher for six years, and I don't own a home, can't afford to. I've got a lot of student loan debt so I could become a teacher and you seem to think we're overpaid? I've never been on a cruise, so what the hell are you talking about? Jealous rage is all it is.
Welcome to the new American poverty: brought to you by anti-union, greedy, slave-driving despots who can't stand the thought of their fellow citizen trying to struggle to a level which approaches theirs.
Two cars? A bigger house? Are you daft, man? Many of us are just trying to get by on the peanuts you throw our way. You want to see Cairo riots in your home town, just keep up the efforts at keeping us down.
Mac Deezy: But you don't live in Madison. See Sven's comment above about the bus drivers. That's just one example of radical leftism running amuck and out of control.
Sven's comment about the bus driver is probably bull@!$%#. If the driver did get paid that much, he/she probably worked many hours of overtime to boost the salary, which is only right. Wouldn't YOU want to get paid extra for working longer hours? And who's to say the salary wasn't boosted because the driver was asked to work longer hours because of personnel cuts?
I seen Svens comment. What I didn't seen though was any credible evidence that it's true.
Out of all of their drivers, seven made over 100K in 2009. They were the among the senior members that get first crack at overtime. 2009 was also witness to the second highest rider total in over 40 years in Madison. They paid out a total of 1.9 million in overtime that year.
There was also a city hiring freeze that year that didn't allow for vacancies to be filled which resulted in going over budget for overtime pay by nearly 500K. However, for salaries, they were under budget by nearly 300K. If the city didn't freeze hiring, they could have saved money instead of losing it.
Tell madison to go after their comptroller making over 150K a year and the Police Chief making over 145K a year.
Change the policy of how overtime is distributed and how part time help is allocated and you solve this problem. You don't have to throw the baby out with the bath water.
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - BLAME THE VICTIM! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
Just so I get this logic right, its ok to drive a company into the ground, lay off all the workers and scam their pensions to line your pockets and still get paid many millions (before your bonus). But a bus driver is not worth 100 K?
You would think the right who advocates for personal responsibility and getting what they are deserved would applaud these hard working bus drivers who were able to stay in their jobs to work their way up to this impressive figure.
What will it take for this republican whine to end? Do you want public employees to wear shackles while they work?
Tank - it isn't a corporation who is going to benefit from the PUBLIC employees picking up some of their own healthcare and retirement costs. It is the TAXPAYERS who pay their salaries.
We have all had to make concessions to keep our jobs and benefits in the last several years in the private sector. I already have less to give, so how about the public sector take a little less?
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it
First, you do realize that it was the autoworkers unions that raped the auto industry and forced the rest of us to bail them out right? And that was a PRIVATE company. With public services the employees not only get to choose their union reps they also get to help choose the opposition. Basically they (the unions) have the ability (read-money) to influence who they will have to sit across the table from during any negotiations. It doesn’t take rocket scientist to realize this is a recipe for disaster. The reality is there is no need for public service unions; there are other protections in place for public employees.
Backcountry....Last time I checked, the unions do not run the company...that's the responsibility of MANAGEMENT. I've never a report of any management official at one the auto manufacturers being 'forced' to agree to any labor contract. They may agreed to them even though they didn't like them but I'm pretty sure nobody was twisting their arm, holding a gun to their head or kidnapped their family members and were holding them and threating harm if the official didn't settle.
This business about unions somehow forcing business to do something is just plain BS. The MANAGEMENT agreed because they wanted to for reasons that benefited them. If it didn't work out to the advantage of the company then it was the MANAGEMENT that made a mistake by agrreing to a deal thatwasn't good for the company. LABOR does not make contracts FOR the company...they make them for the union. MANAGEMENT makes contracts for the company. That's something you need to get straight. If the contracts weren't good the company...why would MANAGEMENT agree to them? Laziness, no other options? If they didn't have any other options...why not? Poor management maybe?
What a disgusting post! I hope you will have your pink slip soon so that you can understand that there is a need for unions and collective bargaining. When in Britain Children worked in Mines and died early from diseases the unions brought a civilized society in, which cares for workers in return for their work. I have been an HR Manager with major corporations and I can say that these large entities have nothing in mind for workers. The only thing that counts is the profit. May we helped to fall back to dark times both politically and in our society. Republicans seem to want just that and I would like to see those idiotic workers without jobs in Michigan and Ohio that think the Reps will bring them back into work. Be assured, you will stay out of work.
The MANAGEMENT agreed because they wanted to for reasons that benefited them
No sh!t! Keep the union happy or everyone walks off the job. Yeah, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that MANAGEMENT would "benefit" from cars rolling off the assembly line. The UAW has a long history of playing the big three against one another. They would never strike at all three simultaneously, they pick out one (typically the biggest at that moment) strike, and while one company has no cars rolling off the line the other two pick up the shortfall. Which of course provides even more “incentive” for MANAGEMENT to cave into the demands of the union.
Next time you might want to get a clue what you’re talking about BEFORE you go off on a rant.
You're a spineless brown noser. you've probably never even gotten your hands dirty working you effing snob. You go to work each day over the roads, and bridges we build and never give them a second thought. you work in high rises and, malls, structures that we beat our bodies to an early grave to build yet you don"t give it a second thought. You don't give it second thought because all you care about is yourself. You piece of Cr@p! You wouldn't survive a day in our world. Shut the h$ll up and show us the respect we deserve you pencil neck, tie wearin sissy!
I have been an HR Manager with major corporations and I can say that these large entities have nothing in mind for workers.
WHY is it soooooo frigging hard for people to understand that state and federal governments ARE NOT CORPORATIONS!!! People in the public service industries have protections not given to employees of major corporations. Not the least of which is the ability to VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE NEXT TIME. Don't see too many CEO's who have to worry about that when they decide to screw over their employees do you?
And can we PLEASE stop referencing things that don't even relate to the last century let alone this one. (btw Joachim I would LOVE to see just one single source that references unions ending child labor in mines in the UK. JUST ONE, please)
Exactly who are you talking to? You do realize there are 14 post above yours, were you directing your comment at anyone of those post in particular or just barking at the moon?
Backcountry... all your words in 8.14 and you didn't even touch on how it is you think the unions somehow forced them to sign contracts. Outmaneuvering isn't forcing. They companies did the things they did because THEY WANTED TO. Their reasons should have been in the best interests of the company.......after all, that's what MANAGEMENT is for. It seems the MANAGEMENT wasn't up to the task. Using your train of thought, the LABOR is just supposed to take whatever crumbs the company decides THEY are willing to give and be very happy about it, that kinda sounds like being enslaved. It wasn't like the unions dropped an atomic bomb on them and killed or imprisoned 75% of their male children over the age of 16 to get it done.
I think the part that bothers you is that when people actually work together they can get things done in spite of over-whelming obstacles. That's what's happening in the Arab countries as we speak. It happened in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
I also think some people have staked so much of their life to sucking on someones teat who has been perceived to be an 'important person' simply because they've somehow managed to accumulate large sums of money are having a hard time realizing that perhaps there's more to life and wondering what the future their descendants will have and doing things that will hopefully make that future a better place to live for PEOPLE. These rich people have little in the way of loyalty to anything (other than gathering vast sums of wealth) or anyone, and people are learning.....again....that they must take control of the situation if they want any chance at all at life. There are starting to be signs that people are beginning to more highly value the gifts they have received from previous generations and are taking steps to insure that future generations continue to benefit from them also.
People are finding themselves energized again to take control of their lives, and I see that it bothers some quite a bit....to which I say....HAHAHA...... democracy is coming back to life.
johnnyt- It's not rocket science. As long as the UAW strikes at one auto company that company loses money while their competition makes more. If Ford is losing money while watching Chevy and Chrysler take away their customers they are eventually going to HAVE to cave into whatever demands the Union want. Dude, this is recorded history, look up some facts and see for yourself.
People are finding themselves energized again to take control of their lives, and I see that it bothers some quite a bit....to which I say....HAHAHA...... democracy is coming back to life.
The only people that are bothered in Wisconsin are the union members and the Democrats. Democracy IS coming back to life. The people of Wisconsin elected a governor who made this issue a top priority. The people of Wisconsin want this to happen and a MINORITY of people are attempting to circumvent the democratic process. They will fail, democracy will succeed and the collective bargaining rights of the public unions in Wisconsin will be truncated.
Backcountry....Using ones advantage to their benefit isn't forcing. That's a concept you need to get straight. If I walk up to you with a gun and demand you give me your wallet or I'll shoot you....that is forcing. Going into a store and paying the shopkeeper $2.00 for a $1.00 cup of coffee doesn't count as being forced to buy it. The buyer didn't have to pay the extra dollar, but elected to because of reasons that made him/her want to do it.. This is where you are wrong. The companies thought they were better off making the deals they made.
As far as Wisconsin goes...they'll have to find their own way, but if they are going to enact laws this year and then repeal them next year when the people vote in new representatives, doesn't seem to me a method that will be good for stability in our country. But......that's neither here nor there as far as unions being blamed for the auto industry debacle. I'll repeat once more that it was the MANAGEMENT of the company that ran the companies into the ground. There's much ado about taking responsibility and all the blah, blah, blah that is going along with it, but when it comes to these high bucks managers failing the companies, there's not much taking responsibility. That's the hypocrisy of it to me. They are using a full scale diversion tactic to get people to believe that they weren't the ones who actually made decisions that weren't very smart, they get surrogates to try and somehow make a group that does't have ANYTHING AT ALL to do with managing the company responsible. If they were to admit that they indeed were the ones running the company and the companies were in fact being ran into the ground, they couldn't justify their compensation packages they were/are receiving.......so don't look for any responsibility taking on their part.
I've done the best job I can in a limited venue to explain why I do not believe the fault of failing auto companies should be laid at the unions doorstep. If I've made any errors feel free to correct me. To me it's simply a matter of calling a spade a spade. While I can see a need for unions, I do not agree with them in lockstep.....especially with regard to disbursement of union funds to less than savory businesses and individuals under the guise of 'investments'. As far as promoting their political beliefs, the unions are made up of living breathing people. If they decide they want to organize and mobilize for a particular candidate or party I'd say that should be up to the membership of the union, but I do not have any say whatsoever in any unions decisions.
Unions have their issues, and they are going to have to start addressing many of them I have always had an issue with people that demand to collective bargain but when cuts have to be made they throw the young guys under the bus with the layoffs instead of taking a small pay cut across the board.
It isn't the unions that caused issues for the automakers, less innovative designs, keeping brands that should have been axed long ago. Poorly constructed trade agreements that undercut the labor market forcing people to take lower wages. There is just a range of various things that contributed to it.
Backcountry...You are making some progress with your thinking by at least starting to admit that the companies were the ones who made decisions for the company. Keep up the logical thinking and you just might get around to seeing who really put the companies in the shape they were in.
What makes you think I am affiliated with the UAW? Is it because I actually understand the whole MANAGEMENT/LABOR concept a little better than you, and the only thing you can think to say is "how much are your annual UAW dues'? Good one. That really cleared up a lot of things.....yessireee! You sure showed me! You probably also believe the MANAGEMENT TEAM that ran the auto companies in the ground were worth every penny they received. I also wonder if some of the reason that the UAW received those contracts were due to the management themselves being grossly overpaid for ruining the companies and in trying to justify their compensation let the workers have more....but what the hey....it's a free country and that's what free enterprise is all about....right? Just don't try blaming someone else for for your own stupidity!That's only compounding matters.
Your line of thinking takes credit for all the success and no credit for all the failure...that's a good deal...if you can get it! But you won't be getting it from me.
By the way....even though it's none of your business, I'll tell you anyway...I pay the UAW exactly zero in annual dues.
Jovi1: While I'm not absolutely certain, I do not believe the unions cut people by age. I believe they cut by senority. I believe they would cut a 60 year old with 5 years senority before they would cut a 27 year old with 6 years senority. It only stands to reason that if they are using senority as a measure then older people would be in a better position generally because they've had a longer life to gain that senority if they joined at an early age....but it isn't always the case..
Johnny- for what it’s worth I do not believe the UAW was 100% responsible for what happened to the auto industry and I am relatively certain that management makes considerably more than they’re actually worth. But if you think the union bears no responsibility then you are, quite simply, a fruitcake. And if you believe unions cannot force management into accepting things they do not want then you are utterly clueless OR you are a union exec trying to con the rest of us into believing a bunch of garbage.
The FACT of the matter is that BIG unions have become just as corrupt, if not more so, than the BIG corporations. The only difference between the two is that there are laws protecting even non-union employees from corps but there is NO protection from the potential abuses of the unions. And when someone tries to put those protections in place you can clearly see what happens.
Backcountry....A fruitcake? I guess that falls into the same category as 'how much do I pay the UAW in union dues.
Right before that I thought we were getting closer to an understanding because you seemed to understand that the companies were in the drivers seat.
I'll stand by any comment that I've made about the unions forcing the companies to do something they didn't want to do. The company can take their bat & ball and go home...nobody from the unions were forcing them to keep their doors open. They looked at all the factors and decided that signing the contract was better for them than not signing. Again....no gun was held to their head or their families threatened. It's a business. They buy labor like they buy tires. They need tires to make a car and they NEGOTIATE for them. If they don't like the price of the tires they don't buy them....of course....just like labor, without the tires the car can't be. That's a concept you seem unable to understand. In fact....many did just that and took their game to another field. And though this is a topic for another discussion,I'll briefly touch on it just to add some background to my beliefs about Corporate America. I believe that taking technology developed in this country mostly at the expense of the taxpayer through contracts to companies that generate a good portion of their revenue and technological breakthroughs from those government contracts, is at the very least unethical and possibly treasonous.
As you can guess I am not in total agreement that the corporations do not have any protections. I believe they have plenty of protections....not the least of which is the finest government money can buy.
I'll grant you that unions haven't always fostered the highest standards. Organized crime has had a serious taint on the unions in the past. That's pretty much a thing of the past I believe. The likes of Rudy Giuliani and company have dealt them a crippling blow and here in NY they recently rounded up a bunch more from NY, CT., RI, and NJ. They haven't eliminated them but they've been pretty well marginalized. I think a lot of the stereotypes people use when bashing unions no longer apply, but because they did persist for a long time people just keep right on thinking they still do. I believe that the unions are weakened to the point where they cannot do much good any longer. I also believe that they may have hit the bottom of their fall and will mount a revival fueled by business' latest attempts at exploiting the American worker. The real surprise to me about all this is the Tea Party and their apparent zeal about illegal immigrants flooding our country. One would think that they would realize that if illegal immigration is one of their priorities, they would want to ally themselves with the unions because it is those very same union workers that are being assaulted by illegal workers and who most likely are undercutting their own ability to make a decent living . It seems like a natural alliance to me, but instead the Tea Party has decided that the American Worker, if he's in a union is the enemy and a multi-billionaire who only has a win-win situation by all this anti-union effort being successful is their friend. I find that strange..... actually...I find it very strange.
You said that when someone tries to put protections in place for the Corporations we see what happens. They only thing I can say to you is that one corporations protections might be another mans bonds. I understand completely the amount of influence that Big Business has with our government, but....as long as politicians still have some fear of the people in this country they will not go the extra mile and try to strip all rights and freedoms away. I believe that most politicians only use the papers that founded this country when it benefits them to do it and basically they'd use them for toilet paper if that was all that was available. It's only the belief that a major @!$%#storm would erupt if they tried pushing any harder right now. That's what makes this effort in Wisconsin so puzzling to me. I think that possibly they might have believed that a shock and awe type of assault on the unions would catch them and everyone else by surprise and they could break them before anyone even knew what happened. Things haven't exactly played out that way and people are becoming interested in this issue because it could very possibly have ramifications for them as well. This might in the end prove to be the undoing of the GOP/TP if people come to the belief that they were played for suckers by them. You might laugh at that....but.....just look around the world and lot of previously long held beliefs are being proven wrong almost daily.
I hope this is just the beginning. as neversurrender says, I'm sure Eric Holder is quivering and sweating trying to get a hold of this. I hope he finds a way to sue. It will cement the fate of the Obama "regime". I use the word regime intentionally.
Unfortunately I live in Massachusetts. We will have to go way more broke for this dream to ever occur in our state.
After Nov 2, I don't think Obama will get involved. His own skin is on the line now and from what he's telegraphing, it looks like he'll throw as many bodies under the bus as needed to get re elected.
Nov 2 is proof that we the people are still in control. We have made a difference!
Socialism was alive and well in Wisconsin and elsewhere in the country long before Obama came into office. As in any communist country you have the majority who work for the government receiving all the benefits and the lower class struggling to feed themselves. Money is power and I'm tired of giving mine away to the government, which includes government employees. I'll take one of those jobs at half the pay, easily contribute more towards insurance, and with the money I save on taxes I'll have my own pension plan.
yes, the cushy life of ease of the government employee. baby you are so jealous of something you have no comprehension of. The majority of Wisconsin citizens work for the govt? the poor are struggling to get food because of govt employees?
I don't know what's worse, that you think this or that someone reading what you wrote will smugly (and blindly) agree.
When republicans ran government unemployment was 4.6% and jobs were going begging. Now that democrats are running government unemployment is 9% with a record 22 months above 9% and people are going begging.
In the four years that democrats have controlled congress, we've gone from a sellers market to a buyers market. When there are ten jobs for every person, workers prosper, when there are ten people for every job, workers suffer. You want better worker conditions? Vote republican!
Valhalla Phil, you are incorrect. The unemployment rate began to rise within the first two years of GWBush's first term. And, he was responsible for most of the current deficit by funding two wars off of the budget while cutting taxes for the rich.
Look it up. Educate yourself and don't just listen to Fox and Rush.
Brenda, You reallly are showing how little you know. Clinton left Bush with a surplus. Again turn off your TV and read a little bit. Bush left this country in a mess!!!
Actually the "Clinton Surplus" was a lie. He fudged when the numbers were reported to us to show he was getting the budget on track. If there was a surplus why did the national debt continue to grow when he got the budget "balanced"? In short he didn't and he lied to us. It isn't the first time a politician has lied and it won't be the last unfortunately.
Valhalla your memory may be not so good that you understand what brought us there. Two wars by a warmonger party and Bush in order to profit for is family from the oil game. Two wars that have cost trillions of dollars, that have robbed the middle class of their wealth and and sickening attitude of a republican party to reward the rich with a tax cut that is not paid for. Get your facts right before you make idiotic statements.
By most of the posts above, the reason we are in an outsourcing paradise for the mega corporations, Corporations paid Republicans to push FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS. Democrats were either, too stupid, or too greedy to stop them from doing it.
Our economy will not recover so long as the FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS are in effect with a treaty, or our tariffs being almost zero.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
This last statement is the only way we will ever fix the US economy, period.
Financial responsibility at the expense of infrastructure and life. Read up on the some raiding of funds to cover up holes in his budget while he was a county supervisor. Then read up on the piece of cement that fell of the parking garage and killed a 15 year old.
Way to go anyone who voted Republican. Maybe someday and soon, the people of this country will realize that Republican's are NOT for middle class Americans, they are for the RICH, and that's the way it will always be. The rich pad their pockets, get them elected and screw the middle class!! I almost don't feel sorry for any of these people that voted this idiot Republican Governor in office, but then again, I do of course!
Way to go anyone who voted Republican. Maybe someday and soon, the people of this country will realize that Republican's are NOT for middle class Americans, they are for the RICH, and that's the way it will always be.
LOL! I am a person of this country and I am middle class. I am so happy this is happening you wouldn't believe it! But then again you would have to understand that I'm all for paying someone what they're worth not what they demand they should be paid. Nothing in life is guaranteed sunshine. It's time the parasitic union leaches figured this out. Maybe you'll get a clue to.
Conservative and usually vote republican. Forced out of a job in a school district due to service in my country's military, I've made under the poverty level each year since 2001. No public hand outs, no welfare, no unemployment. Has it been a bitch making it all work? You bet, but you do what you have to. Yes, I've survived as a single parent for 9+ years on less than $15K a year. And I just paid my house off... Time for the rest of you to STFU and start doing what you have to. Dumb liberals - for everyone who thinks like them and no one else.
We're talking about getting a fair wage for a group of people who spent 4 or more years in college and then CHOSE to take less money getting a job to help our future. A teacher gets paid less than their market even when including benefits. They generally get about 2% a year but since they work for 30+ years everybody like to point at the teachers at the top end of the spectrum and say "look how much teachers' make". Its a joke and its dishonest. If you don't know the economics of the situation stay quiet. Its better to not say anything and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
How much is a master's degree worth in pay? Go do some research and look up average Salary of those with Master's Degrees. Compare that with teacher's salaries. Considering most states require a Master's degree to teach above Elementary school, is that pay comproble?
If it is, then you have nothing to bitch about. If it is less, then yes, they are underpaid. If it is more, then maybe you have a point. Do some research and let us know. In the State of Washington, I KNOW that teachers make a hell of a lot less then what their degrees would bet them in the public sector. I always vote for teacher pay increases because they are getting short changed.
If they are getting "underpaid" there is nothing stopping them from getting a real job in the private sector. There is no such thing as underpaid. You and the employer agree on pay or one of you walks. If everyone was paid what they THOUGHT they were worth, we'd all be billionaires! :<)
Your real worth, (as an employee), is what someone is willing to pay you. Anything else is delusional.
Hardly a fake story, If you would like you can come and visit me, in my tiny shack in Ashland WI and I'll show you my life of the last 10 years. Including my Social security statements, my military DD214's, introduce you to my daughter and even let you have a gander at my financial accounts over the period I discussed above.
As for the fair wage arguement, do you think I should make more than a teacher when getting shot at and taking mortar fire when deployed or do you think that those with a 4 year degree are worth more than those that put themselves in harms way?
I sure hope your willing to pay me what a public employee receives for a computer science degree when I graduate in 2013...
and, anyone can quote Mark Twain, it's just a shame you can't heed his advice.
Lets see here im in my late 30s, my mother who just retired from a teaching position ( non union ) raised my sister and I in the low ten thousand a year salary. She was a teacher, not because she wanted money, she was a teacher because she loves kids and wanted to help them with their future. It can, and does, happen everyday. You go without Cable, Game systems, new flat screen TVs.. Xmas presents are socks and underwear not throw away games you see now.
See you and other people griping about teachers pay are looking at the National Average. My mother, and thoes like her, ARE Underpaid.. Look up teh difference between pay and bennies between Union Teachers, and Non-Union Teachers. The difference is as drastic as night and day.. We arent talking about non union teachers here. We are talking about unioned teachers.. Who in general are in teaching for the paycheck and not love for the job. IF IT was about the kids, then they would be doing their damn job and teaching the kids intead of protesting having to pay parts of thir pension and insurance.
What makes you say that teaching is not a real job? I have a feeling your education level has a little to do with it.
That's usually the case. People who hate teachers, as many of you seem to, usually didn't do very well in school and, of course being people who preach "personal responsibility" they blame the teacher.
There is no such thing as underpaid. You and the employer agree on pay or one of you walks.
Then CEOs won't mind earning less when they screw up a company, since there is no such thing as underpaid right? How much do you make Phil? How would you feel if all your experience and training boiled down to.. "We are paying you X. Cope." What if that amount was the same as the guy who just graduated high school, with no training, and no experience?
I've seen that happen to teachers. I had a friend who had a masters degree, and four years of experience on the job. She was earning less then $40,000 a year. Me? No degree, some experience, earning $50,000 at the time. It is called equitable pay. It was not fair to the teachers.
Now consider this, if there is no value in being a teacher, who is going to teach our children reading, writing and math? Do you have time to do it? I don't. I have to work 8 hours a day, plus commute an hour each way, plus cook dinner, and do dishes, plus my school work so I can get that degree I was stupid enough to skip out on 15 years ago.
If we don't pay teachers an equitable salary, then the best teachers stop teaching, and we create a self defeating circle. Only the Teachers who can't get good paying jobs, teach, and really, I don't want a teacher teaching my child, if they arent good enough to get a better job elsewhere.
I used to live in Wisconsin - back in the days of Stick it to 'em Tommy Thompson - a real egomaniac of a governor. Back in those days the only substantial difference between the republicans and the democrats was that the republicans would waste money by throwing it at the road and prison builders and the democrats would waste money by throwing it at public employees and teachers. None of these clowns cared the least bit about the people paying the taxes for all this stuff so long as they could keep getting funding for their favored constituencies. As a result of that, Wisconsin had some of the highest taxes in the country. Now it looks like the tide may be changing.
Congratulations to Walker if/when he gets this through. Its not as good as making Wisconsin a right-to-work state but its a major step on the way and no doubt one that will actually save the taxpayers of that state - the real middle class - some serious money.
How much is a master's degree worth in pay? Go do some research and look up average Salary of those with Master's Degrees. Compare that with teacher's salaries. Considering most states require a Master's degree to teach above Elementary school, is that pay comproble?
WTF does the level of eduction have to do with the level compensation? You epitomize the thinking that got this country into the mess the State of Wisconsin is finally trying to dig itself out of. Using your logic if I went to school and got a Masters or PHD in bumf$ckery I should be paid the same as an individual that got a Masters or PHD in chemistry. What planet does this logic fly on?
I hope you realize that unless you (or your parents) are working for the government, your wages or salary is paid by a rich person. By trying to emasculate the rich, you are killing the very group that is funding your support.
Even if you are working in a privately endowed university, your salary is paid through the tuition paid by rich parents or by grants that are made possible by donations from rich alumni. If you are a goverment employee or working for a state supported institution--then your salary is ultimately being paid by the taxpayer. The same taxpayer that voted a legislature into office that will do something about your state deficit.
If the GOP really supports only the rich, then they are simply looking out for the cash cow that makes our country run--and that ultimately benefits all of us.
Quite frankly, I think the Dem's and the GOP are both spending us into oblivion, and I'm thankful that your Governor has the cajones to take a first step in the opposite direction.
Oh, and someone pointed a gun at new teachers and made them take the job? I believe that, in this country, one has to apply for a job to get one. Everyone has a CHOICE. If you decide to go to college and get a Master's Degree in education, at what point did you not realize that teachers pay for an M. Ed. is a teensy bit less than an MBA?
It's all a moot point anyway as to how much the person is worth if THERE IS NO MONEY TO PAY THEM.
Make some concessions or face the layoffs. That is the choice being offered. Just like in the private sector, if there is no money, there ain't going to be no job.
Funny, sven says the education level has nothing to do with pay yet he will turn around and scream about how a doctor goes to school and gets all that education so they should be highly paid. ADHD I tell you. You people can't make up your minds. You're on then off then on then off then on again. It makes ones head spin.
Funny, sven says the education level has nothing to do with pay yet he will turn around and scream about how a doctor goes to school and gets all that education so they should be highly paid.
Oh, and someone pointed a gun at new teachers and made them take the job?
It's a gun from inside, but yes. A good teacher is compelled to teach. I, for one, resisted majoring in education, and went through three different majors before I relented. It also needs to be done, so taking away incentives to teach is sort of a bad idea.
Any teachers here know what would happen to our TRFs if we lost the union?
Dear Republicans: You wanted balanced budgets as long as the cuts do not affect your current lifestyle in any way. Sorry, it doesn't work like that. Everyone pays (except for the uber rich, of course).
Because I trust politicians to treat their employees fairly. Welcome to the Wal- Mart state. Productivity will soon fail to zero. Get ready for mid east type demonstrations. Who is going to stop it? The disgruntled state workers? Not likely.
I have lived in a right to work state, been employed in companies where I joined the Union and in companies where I chose not to. I have worked for companies that had no Union. I have worked in management and in craft.
I have seen managers abuse there positions and seen people get fired not over real work performance, but over who some one is dating, or over a fender bender in the parking lot. But all that happened in the companies where there was no Union to stand up for worker rights. In every Unionized company I have worked, there has been way less employer intimidation possible. Unions are not about just the money, yes they do work for the benefit of there members. But they also support safe and dignified work environments.
Now I have seen employees abuse Union protection, so I can't say they are perfectd. But erroring in the side of more protections seems like it makes for a better over all work environment.
Not quoting statistics here, just a long life experience.
Ok a stupid number that is ashamed of his or her real name these are the facts - Wisconsin had no deficit - given by an unbiased government agency - however all the tax benefits given by Walker for his crony supporters would put Wisconsin in the red - oh my god where will the money come from? Eureka - what my boys in DC said to do on the backs of the civil servants - and bye the way we will break the unions because - why - duh - they support Democrats - Karl Rove's play book - the fat boy is still at work - don't you love him - a ton of money to break the Democratic Party
This is just the beginning....the government wants to get rid of unions. Soon, people will be working for whatever the employer wants to pay, as many hours as the employer wants you to work, and have no benefits, pensions etc.
This is just the beginning....the government wants to get rid of unions. Soon, people will be working for whatever the employer wants to pay, as many hours as the employer wants you to work, and have no benefits, pensions etc.
You really don't have a clue, do you? An employer pays whatever he has to to get the caliber of workforce his market demands. You hire crappy people, like former State of Wisconsin workers, and you won't last in your industry very long. Employers hire the best they can afford for what their market dictates. You want a guaranteed job with a guaranteed wage you probably need to locate somewhere outside the sea to shining sea. :)
And the return of the company store. We will all be indentured servants with the way the Republicans are returning us to the days of the Robber Barons. If he were still alive, J.P. Morgan would be thrilled!!! I'm sure it pleases his off-spring. Let's hear it for the kleptocracy!!
I work, no make that worked at a non-union job for eight years, got laid off, the company put me on a " temporary layoff" said I would be back no later than December, yet here I am still laid off. As I write this many more are being laid off because of " salees are down there is a lack of work" they are being told when things are picked up they will be recalled back to work, as soon as these workers are laid off the company has replaced them with temporary workers ( temps) who they pay less wages who don't get any benefits ( paid holidays, insurance, ( life or medical) so the company can make a bigger profit margin. The benefits oof the workers that were laid off were those they earned through hard work and the time they faithfully worked for the company. If there was a lack of work the temps would not have been needed for lack of demand for the products. Do those of you out there think unions are the problems that without them the companies will look out for the workers, look at my company and you will see the union was not the problem ( we had none ) the drive for profit was and will continue union or nonunion. bussiness are all about profit and care not for the workers.
realnard...Why were you one of the first to get laid off, while others kept working ??...Obviously they were more valuable to the company than you were. That should tell you something right from the get go.....you got 99 weeks of unemployment coming....
Businesses are about profit. If not, then why bother going into business. Jobs are a byproduct of a business needing to provide more goods or services to their customers than the original company could supply. When the demand for those goods or services goes down....a subsequent reduction in the workforce is the result.
 Now let's hope this catches on all over the nation......and I work for a county gov't. It would make it easier to get rid of the non-productive gov't employees who just show up and collect a paycheck....which there are a lot of.
[It would make it easier to get rid of the non-productive gov't employees...]
And it will make it easier to get rid of YOU as well...ever think of that? If YOU think you are a model government employee, and your job is the "safe" one, think again.
Be careful what you ask for...you just might get it.
I keep hoping that our NJ Gov Christie can whack more and more of our overpopulation of highly-paid no-show or excess administrators and then proceed to tear the cheeit out of the unions when many of the CBAs coming up this year. I'm out of money to keep paying what I pay for property and state taxes.
you repugs are brilliant!!! Did you know that another tea partier in the Kansas legislature just introduced a bill to remove child labor laws? thats the next step in creating a two class society. Gosh, we can return to the time that 10 yr olds worked in sweat shops.
Little did Wisconsin voters know that when they elected Walker as governor, they were getting a Mubarek instead. Since the legislators and governor are state employees, they should have their pensions slashed as well. Taxpayers give them way too much money. What is next for Wisconsin? End of the 40 hour work week, erasing child labor laws, and worker safety laws? Looks like the Republican legislators up for re-election are trying to make it real easy to get voted out of office in 2012.
What is next for Wisconsin? End of the 40 hour work week, erasing child labor laws, and worker safety laws? Looks like the Republican legislators up for re-election are trying to make it real easy to get voted out of office in 2012.
LOL! I guess they won't get the Union vote! LOL!
Hey Brian, you know why State of Wisconsin workers don't look out the window in the morning?
Cause if they did that they wouldn't have anything to do in the afternoon. :D
I'm not against collective bargaining for the workers, but as a taxpayer in WI (read as employer) I have never been to the negotiating table with the public workers union as my taxes increased. I have to contribute to my pension and pay for health care coverage (which increased 2300% in my 16 yrs at work) and take furlough weeks, so I would draw a real hard line negotiating with the workers to help pay 100% for them. Sorry WI employees, I really can't afford your services anymore after paying registration fees and income taxes and property taxes and being billed from the fire department for a 1 mile ambulance trip $600. I just wish he hadn't promised you no furloughs or lay offs.
I wish I could get back to paying so little for my benefits. And I'm in a union and I work for a utility! sorry no sympathy, I went from paying 0% to 20% for health and from a db pension to a 401k and no one shed any tears for me. I'm just happy to be employed.
Spoken like a true indentured servant. Enjoy your servitude. Once your union is completely dismantled (with your approval, apparently) you can be replaced by someone making even less (probably not even in this country) and provide no benefits.
Does the phrase "slippery slope" mean anything to you?
sure does, the slippery slope of entitlements is what got us into this mess in the first place, I'm just enough of a realist to see that things are out of balance all around. You can't just keep crying for more when the kitty is in the hole.
FastMovingCloud - where does the money come from to continue on the path we are on now? We are broke, we all are gonna have to tighten our belts.
You are making the taxpayer the indentured servant to the public employee. In essence you are saying that we must all work harder and harder in the private sector so that we can give more and more to the government employees.
No were not broke the money is being sent to the top in the form of massive tax cuts that don't help anyone but the rich and Corporate welfare. Stop that money from being artificially sent to said top and we would be fine.
We keep hearing about Shared sacrifice whenever they try and take away rights or wages. Well the rich haven't given up just @!$%# yet while cuts have already been made by nearly every member of the poor and middle class.
Matt - This hurts you as well. You just don't know it yet. All those work related items you take for granted like a 40 hour work week, weekends off, vacation/holdiay pay, child labor laws and I could go on....all negotiated by unions past and eventually trickled into the private workforce as well. Now my friend you are witnessing the demise of the middle class and the benefits you take for granted at your place of employment will erode as well. Wishing bad to come to unionized middle class workers is wishing bad to come to the middle class of this country.
Laurie. I do not wish bad to anyone. I do wish our condition was much better, but it is in a sad state of affairs. How long am I and my neighbors supposed to foot the bill for overpayed staffs who have staffs of their own? I wish them all well, but don't want to end up out of control like our neighbor state to the south. I looked at the proposal, and to me it's not that grievous.
I totally agree. Unions served a good purpose and began with a noble cause, but now they've gone so far over the "workers rights" line that it's hurting everyone. Their definition of the word "rights" is pretty cushy. My husband is a teacher (TX) and we have to contribute to his pension, whether we want to or not, it's just taken from his checks, and we pay 65% of our health premiums! These people should jump at the chance to only pay 13% versus the alternative of thousands of layoffs.
It's interesting that people are making this out to be liberals vs. conservatives, Republicans vs. Democrates. The bottomline is that we are at a budget crisis and we need compromise. Stripping bargining power of union will not solve the deficit as long as the people / companies in power are not willing to contribute equally. We need to held everyone accountable. As a conservative, I don't have a problem with bill as long as it is done equally. Unions for police, patrol officers and fire fighters not being part of the bill sets a bad precedent for the future. Also, the bill should impact union and non-union employees equally, including legislatures and the governor himself. Leadership is a about setting a good examples for others for follow. Thus far, Scott is failing on that respect.
That reference just went right over the teabagger's heads. "Upton who? Jungle what?"
The irony of your post to me is hilarious. My post was sarcasm that went right over your Left Wing Liberal Wack Job head, genius.
Us "teabaggers", you know the everyday working men/women of this country that know nothing of guarantees of any kind, nor should I say want them since guarantees of any kind come with strings attached which in turn limit our freedoms? Us teabaggers, a name I will honorably wear this day forward, don't want dick from anyone. What I have I earn. When you pathetic "enlightened ones" get a clue and figure out that all you'll ever have is the memory you've left behind and not all the crap you got at the expense of others than maybe there will be some hope for you. Until then I'm going to download the State of Wisconsin anthem "On Wisconsin" and proudly play it every morning in honor of this memorable day!
Anyone who has to pump themselves at another person's expense is themselves a moron, a bully. So easy to blather whilst sitting your fat arse on that computer chair.
That kind of talk is not helpful. I don't want to see union-busting approved either but talking of "taking people out" is not the way. You need to seek counseling for your anger management problem.
Wow-Union Busting is rearing it's ugly head and taking us back to the 19th. century folks. What's next children in sweat shops- the elimination of child Labor Laws? Jacob Riis-where are you when we need you? I guess when it's the federal govt. Repugs call it Big Brother-but it's okay when the states are oppressing the rights of their citizens-that's just "Big Business."
These brainwashed idiots by the news media. We are slowly going back to the dark ages while the rich get richer. So easy to brainwash americans. Media has never put out accurate facts about pay and retirement benifits. God help us all where this country is headed.
What a ridiculous post, yet it's the same mindless rant that keeps coming up whenever anyone tries to lessen the power of the unions.
Child labor laws will not be repealed if the unions disappear.
Sweat shops will not reappear if the unions disappear.
Fight it as you will but the American people are speaking loudly against the unions.
We're tired of having so many of our high school graduates having to take remedial reading and math before beginning their degree courses because somehow they graduated without learning the basics.
We're tired of paying the extra $1600 tacked on to each car to pay the union benefits.
I watched the unionized space center worers strike a few years ago despite the knowledge that their jobs were going to be eliminated with the closing of the shuttle program. They went on strike because they didn't want to contribute to their medical insurance and retirement packages. The strike set a length record, the union lost and got a 90 day gag order to keep it quiet, and the workers lost far more money during the strike than they could ever have hope to save by striking.
Oh, and the non-union replacements and managers had two scuccessful launches and cleared a huge backlog of work left by the union. The inion workers went back with their tails between their legs, that's exactly what they deserved.
If you don't think child labor abuses won't reappear, think again.
"In a move that is raising plenty of eyebrows, Missouri state Senator Jane Cunningham has proposed a bill that would "modify" child labor laws, eliminating the prohibition on employment of children under 14. The proposal has sparked an outcry in the state but Cunningham defends the bill, saying that it's important to cultivate a work ethic in young people and emphasizing that kids are still prohibited from working in dangerous professions."
As Jay Leno asked, why should 10 year old children in China get all the good jobs?
"You are up against the forces of big labor and the radical left."
When the Clinton administration sought to yank Saipan's factories into the 20th century in 1994, requiring the workers be paid a minimum wage, overtime and their living conditions improved, the island government hired a platoon of well-connected Washington lobbyists, headed by former DeLay aide Jack Abramoff, to block the plan.
Someday, we'll be just like Saipan, just keep supporting the Koch brothers.
Madison has a history as a radically leftist city and does not represent the majority of the state. If they don't like being part of the real world, too bad. Fire them! The protesters in Madison are lucky that they live in the US and not in Bahrain or Libya. They should kiss the ground that they walk on.
Goahead and fire them then. Now pay their unemployment benefits, then their emergency room visit for heartburn, then their food stamps, then they do not pay income/sales tax, social security or medicare payments, etc.
Firing them would just open a job for one of the 9.6% unemployed who are receiving unemployment benefits, going to the ER for heartburn, using food stamps, and not paying taxes. Society hasn't lost anything.
Just let the market determine what works. The only time there is unfairness is when artificial requirements are added to fair market situations. It amazes me how many people can disconnect value and wages. People should get paid for what they are worth in a fair market situation, not what they can get by use of threats (strike).
Waterdog, I totally agree with you. I grew up in Madison and the area is very liberal. The rest of the state is much more conservative and is looking for ways to cut the huge deficit that was left by many years of Democratic rule. The neighboring states of Illinois and Minnesota are doubling taxes to continue to pay the state union workers their high salaries and benefits. Both have democratic governors. Wisconsin is also looking at lowering corporate taxes. I bet many of the companies in Illinois and Minnesota will be looking to move to Wisconsin and bring many jobs with them. One more thing, many of my friends are teachers, and not one of them likes being part of the union. All the union does is support the lazy workers.
Madison has a reputation for many things, intellectual excellence and open-mindedness among them. It is precisely because of the atmosphere and attitude that exist in Madison that our UW continues to attract students and researchers of the highest caliber. As a registered democrat and lifelong WI resident, it might surprise many of you that I support the spirit of Walker's bill, but since many of the other stipulations aren't publicly known, I can't say I want to see it passed. As for businesses being drawn to WI because of tax breaks, I'll believe it when I see it. A company moving their operations just barely across the border in order to take advantage of tax breaks while staying close enough for their workers to still live in MN or IL means nothing to our state. That's like living in Chicago and driving to Milwaukee to pick up your welfare check, and the residents of WI know that happens all the time.
People without the education to be a teacher can't just "step into" a teacher's job. What kind of morons are you people? You'd have a screaming hissy fit. the REAL problem in WI is that only 1/3 of corporations pay state income tax. Funny that you overlook that little tidbit. Instead, you join Walker's band blaming public employees. If this piece of crap goes through, I hope you get buried in your uncollected garbage.
Guess what... assuming that you are right, if the other 2/3's of the corporations leave the state because they are forced to start paying state income taxes, then all the tax revenue from the employees that will no longer have jobs will be lost, not to mention the tax revenue that will be lost for goods not sold to the now unemployed worker.
And since when is it an individuals right to work under his or her own terms. If you're not happy with your employer then QUIT! Teachers are no different than any other worker in this country, they are paid by their employer to provide a service under the terms and conditions set by the employer, again, you don't like the terms then quit, that's your only right.
@lisa probably the same idiots that home school their kids, knowing that the world is flat, was created in seven days, and that God refuses to let America prosper because gay people are bad, not because some moron deliberately undercut the labor force here with severely damaging free trade agreements.
It is about time. The majority of unions in this country represent nothing more than organized crime. The sound principles for which the were initially created have been distorted and twisted over the years to become bastions for the lazy and overpaid.
What is amazing is these unions will support a candidate who will completely ruin there futures (Gore in 2000, Minnesota Iron Range) and not think twice about it, but when someone like Governor Walker tries to take away bargaining power, it becomes an all out war with propaganda being spread about how their jobs will become less safe and a mere 8% pay cut will force them to move out of state (Good riddens)! Add to that, these people will use their children to protest the change. How pathetic.
Unions helped a great deal in putting a president in place who supports an amendment for the re-distribution of weath... and now they whine about it when those chickens come home to roost. Guess it's only due to the fact Walker is a republican.
In a welfare state like Wisconsin, this is more than a welcome first step. The taxpayers finally get a break.
Big business wants all unions crushed.. why? They want fair wages and labor practices.. that reduces profits..
Big businesses are making record profits so unions are not the problem.. But big business has done a great job of selling the lies... Many working class people are convinced that unions are bad or un needed.. fooled by the boss again.. duh..
BS Jase_rad ! I bet you would sing a different tune if you were in a union. Unbelievable how these people take the side of big business, the wealthiest 2%, insurance companies, etc.
Carl Rove was right: repeat something often enough and people (unthinking robot types that already have an agenda) will believe it.
over paid i bet all the bankers are not in your word over paid and the same people trying to pass this bill have a pension for just working on term and health care and everything else. i bet you are over paid. or you never need a pay increase i think you are a blind fool and could live of minimum wage to.
It's all working out quite well for them, after all they have jobs, should they not be grateful for that? Mmmmm the ruling class is in session. perhaps a time for the Guillotines return.
NO!?! what is wrong with you and others How far are you going to let the rich and corporate push you down. Just having a job should never be enough it speaks volumes of how beaten down some of you are to claim just haveing a job (@!$%# what it pays @!$%# how your treated) is enough.
First of all,where the hell are the union leaders!!! It looks to me like only a handful of people are taking on the republicans here. The whole concept of abolishing unions may not alarm many,but you have to know,that means that you are trusting big business and some state governments to treat employees with fairness and compassion........really?
As it's been pointed out repeatedly in this discussion, Wisconsin did not abolish any union, they merely put caps on annual compensation increases; prevented individuals from being forced to pay union dues to keep their jobs, and; created the requirment that unions annually prove that they have the support of the constituency which they purport to represent. So, stand down. The sky is not falling.
Candidly, I think it ironic to use the word "trust" in the same sentence as the word "union". It is largely because of unions (and liberals) that the US has lost it's competitive edge. Unaffordable wages and benefits and irrational job segregation and job protection render unionized companies/industries unable to compete in a global economy. Rewarding apathy, laziness and lack of responsibility undermines a nation.
We've lost our way on so many fronts. Equal opportunity should not guarantee equal outcome. It was never meant to do so. In a merit based economy, businesses will reward those individuals who contribute to their profitability. If they don't do so those individuals will go contribute to the profitability of another company. However, unions (and liberals) try to promote equal outcomes irrespective of merit, and not surprisingly merit is the victim.
While we in the US wring our hands about impairing the impunity of unions to foster inefficiency and mediocrity, or why people shouldn't have to pay for homes they purchased, but could not afford - less "developed" nations are creating meritocracies by demanding accountability and excellence. If you've ever worked in India or China, you understand - and you are afraid for your children's future.
This slope of entitlement has become too steep and too slippery to sustain. Unless we move back to the merit based principles that created the once dominant US, we will be unable to afford to compete on any meaningful level.
We must recognize and reward merit. Those awful rich people that the liberals want to punish are the ones that create the jobs for the rest. They do it by working hard, delaying gratification, staying focused and committed to a goal and by creating something of value. It is remarkable that they continue to do so for the marginal returns afforded after taxes.
I don't know of any Union that has looked out for workers rights. They tend to demand that the union members do what they are told and they (union leardership) get fat on the dues paid. They don't understand simple economics and have lead to this nation being on the verge of backrupcy.
"The story around the world is the rush to democracy," said Democratic Sen. Bob Jauch of Poplar. "The story in Wisconsin is the end of the democratic process."
BS...the story around the world is that those people over there are OPPRESSED...
Another idiotic comment from a democratic senator.
When those teachers/unions/people realize that their jobs are paid for by the taxpayer and that when revenues are down, some things have to change, maybe they'll wake up from their stupor.
This is the changing of the guard in America...fiscal responsibility is underway and it begins in the cheese state.
Unaffordable wages and benefits and irrational job segregation and job protection render unionized companies/industries unable to compete in a global economy. Rewarding apathy, laziness and lack of responsibility undermines a nation.
Many of these workers indeed are overpaid and basically have hurt their companies. They really don't deserve the money they make, especially in the rural areas they live in and in turn are the main reason jobs are going overseas.
So I guess the corporations sending jobs abroad is not the reason we have so few jobs here? Where is their 'delayed gratification"?
Yes, there are those that abuse their positions,as do many non-union workers...there are lamefolks all over...It quite insulting to say that we teach because we can't do antything else!!! Many of us left the private sector to become teachers because we wanted to try to make a difference..that doesn't mean we should work cheap just because we choose the profession!! We are not just educators anymore...we a social workers, counselors, character/values teachers...Isn't that the parents job?
Where would you be with out a teacher!!! We as teachers are expected to teach children who don't want to learn, whose parent don't care or who think their children are so perfect...we as a society worry so much about their self-esteem, they aren't being challenged. And if they don't get that "A"..then it's the teachers fault...nevr mind thatyour kid slet thru class or wasw texting or not paying attention..orturned very little work in or bombed the test when you gave them a complete study guide...we should give them a grade rather than they earn it!! It's rather frustrating to work so hard onlty to be told in many different way thatyou are a loser because you chose to be a teacher. No wonder Asia is advancing...they respect & honor teachers!!!
Why is that when the teaparty folks respond they have to call names? Shouldn't their ideas make it on their own merit rather than sensational verbage? Maybe they should have paid attention in English class & would have gain a better vocabulary.
If it is only unions that create all the problems, why do people who work in non-union shops or industries having such a hard time too? According to your thinking industries who are non-union would not move overseas to become more competitive. But most all of our manufacturing HAS moved overseas. And if we are to take your advice and just work harder (merit) we will not have any problems. Well I do contribute a LOT to my employer, and I know I am replacable, but my boss - who is the business owner does not even know what I do. If he were to fire me or I were to quit with no notice NO ONE would know exactly what to do day to day to get the things I do done. There would be a long time of trial and error to get things back on track. And I cannot train anyone to do my job as I am the only full-time employee left. For all this that I do and no one else can do, I have not gotten a raise in over 3 years. And during this time of stagnant wages, my taxes (property and local) have gone UP. Not because of union workers but because the city I live in has decided that they have to COMPETE with other localities and are spending my tax dollars foolishly on NEW projects which willl benefit no one but local business people. But the business people are all in what we in Wisconsin call TIF (tax incremental financing) districts whereby they pay no taxes into the general funds, but only pay for improvements which supposedly will make their business more competitive. Without these "tax incentives" the business' will move to another locality where they can get the incentives. They care nothing about my community or the people who reside there.
Letting business run local government sounds like a good idea until you finally realize that those business do not care about anything but their bottom line, and will do anything to increase their own share of the pie
texasbob--your comment is more than offensive. Where would you be without the teachers in your life? Those who choose to be educators in any form are honorable people. They are highly educated; are lifelong learners; and understand they will never get rich. From early childhood educators to the trainers in large corporations, educators should be respected and treated with dignity. They work far harder than most people think and receive very little gratitude.
If teachers are so good, than why do they need a union? Why is the U.S.A ranked 14th in reading 17th in science and 25th in mathematics? If they cannot do better than this and still expect a pay check I am not sure about the honorable part.
Much of the union business has nothing to do with compensation and everything to do with the quality and structure if the students' day. Without negotiating power, schools can run any hours, any days of the week, for as long in the year as the individual schoolboards would like. Class sizes would be uncontrolled. Your child's teacher may or may not get the inservice time they need to stay effective and current. It's not all about money.
texasbob--yes, we are lagging other countries in terms of quality of education. Why? Because we do not put education first in this country. We do not expect excellence from our students; we do not applaud excellence in our teachers; we do not respect our schools and educators. We are too worried about whether our children are upset; whether they have plenty of free time; whether our job as parents is too hard. When a student comes to a classroom, they arrive with all the baggage from home and are often unsupported from home in regard to their education. Teachers spend unbelievable hours of off duty time preparing lessons, researching resources, increasing their own education levels, grading school work and creating assignments etc etc etc. The time they have "free" is usually spent trying to create a good environment in their classrooms and dealing with issues their students have that are not education related. We are beginning to see how this all plays out as our college students only do the bare minimum required and have little commitment to the learning they have the privilege of having at their fingertips. They decry any expectations on the part of professors and are offended when told they must meet deadlines. How do I know all of this? My husband, daughter, son, and daughter-in-law are educators and I come from a long line of educators and lifelong learners. I returned to college at the age of 55 to work on (and accomplish, by the way) my undergrad degree in English. I spent 5 years in those college classrooms and saw the deplorable underprepared students and the total lack of commitment and appreciation for the privilege of learning. It broke my heart to see it. So, until this country decides to make education a priority in our homes, our towns, our schools, and our governmental language, we can expect to lose our place in the global economy. Sir, your disdain for teachers is part of the problem. Can you begin to be a part of the solution?
Linda, while my kids were in school I would go visit their teacher during their teacher conferences only to find out the teachers were willfully unprepared to teach many of the subjects assigned to them. Now I talk to my grandkids about their school and it is evident their teachers are unprepared. When I went to college many of my instructors were out dated and unprepared to teach new and cutting edge technologies my peers and I needed to succeed after graduation. Recently I went back to college to update my skill set; a total waste of money.
I too believe education need to be a priority, but as I watch the new on Wisconsin it is evident that education is not the priority of the teachers there.
Please don’t take my disdain for teachers personal; I have disdain for everyone that I am forced to pay that do not earn the wages given to them.
Way to go Wisconsin!!! I'm amazed at the amount of support for this on the MSNBC site! Maybe our country is actually waking up to our fiscal situation.
I'm a lifelong Republican and lifelong government worker (20 years miliary and on my 1 year of civil service). Way to go Wisconsin. No need for unions in the government, let alone industry. There are enough government regulations now to protect workers.
Unions prevent you from firing unqualified workers. Time for them to go. And yes, I'm a member of a government union, forcefully conscripted.
It's only supported on an MSNBC site because it's a republican base on this site. The real solution for budget deficit is slashing military spending by a good 50% or so. They're useless anyhow.
I'm a lifelong Republican and lifelong government worker (20 years miliary and on my 1 year of civil service). Way to go Wisconsin. No need for unions in the government, let alone industry. There are enough government regulations now to protect workers.
So you retired on a pension after twenty years? Are you getting medical? Maybe there's the problem. Time to cut back on those benefits along with the others.
It saddens me to see just how many people there are out there who are clueless. Our Wisconsin Governor along with his cronies are turning you all into lemmings. Stop and think about what you are backing. You ruin education by driving many out and I will pray that the people you depend on for care as you age can read a medicine bottle and write prescriptions correctly.
I think President Obama should lead the way. He is rich. He makes millions every year from outside his salary. Why won't he show us the way and set the example? He won't! Liberals give very little to others. Conversatives outgive liberals of the same economic level 5 to1. I am in the middle class and live within my means. Sacrifice means givinjg something up. The unions want to live like those that hire them. Well, they didn't create a company, they didn't take the risk, they didn't supply the capital. If taxes go up to keep paying the gov't union worker, it will hurt me. It's time to stop the maddness.
I work with ex-teachers and one of the things that drove them out was the union that protected the bad teachers. Any teacher that wants to quit is welcome to leave any time.
Al, you show your ignorance and prejudice when you say things like "liberals give very little to others." Are you friends with every liberal? No, because I'm a liberal and I would never be friends with someone who speaks like you. It's easy to spout statistics that you read on some conservative blog but have very little factual basis. I'm a liberal who feels that unions, like big business and and any other over-reaching entity, need to be reined in and overseen. What I give or don't give is irrelevant and is not pertinent to the topic at hand, namely unions.
I worked as a union carpenter for about 30 years, some of that time I worked on a few non-union jobs. The union jobs were much better managed, had much safer working conditions, better tools and a better trained crew. On non-union jobs some days you took your life in your hands going to work.
I am married and have four daughters. My wife is a teacher, three of my daughters are teachers. They all have B. A. degrees, one has a masters, one will start a masters program this summer. They love teaching, and none of them went into it for the money.
This whole WI debacle is not about anything other than union busting. Once the unions aren't able to protect the workers rights, the corporations will destroy the American work force. How many jobs have been outsourced. The thing is, you pay $50 for an item made in America, the job is outsourced and made way cheaper, but you still pay $50 for the same item. Where do the savings and profits go, back to the corporations. Look at an old Carhartt catalog, then look at a new one. And now the Supreme's have giving the multi-national corporations the right to give boatloads of money to candidates they support, and with the weaken labor unions unable to balance the cash flow of the corporations we end up with a congress bought and paid for by Big Business, Big Oil and the Big Banks. Doom on the American working class. $700 billion for the top 2% of wealthy Americans, no new banking regulations, watered down stock market regulations. And it's all the Presidents fault, good luck America!!!
great comment until the last line. it is in no way, shape or form the President's fault. Obama was outraged at SCOTUS ruling on Citizens United and he said so during last years State of the Union on national TV. in fact, I think it was Supreme Alito who mouthed the words "not true" when Obama blasted it. check your facts friend. it is a great comment but it is solely the fault of the GOP and tea party.............follow the money.......it will take you right to the Koch boys. & along the way you'll probably see the Tea bagger princess, Ginny Thomas, wife of Supreme Clarence Thomas. yo dude, c'mon man, face facts, this nightmare of a governor in WI is yet another teabagger spawn. they are whacked and they are dangerous. I'm proud to see my fellow Democrats stand up to their mania.
One thing I don't understand about unions is how they can remain in place for some businesses while other workers do not have this sort of representation. The premise of private labor unions seems pretty unfair. Why don't we abolish private unions and give everyone the same sort of representation and rights regardless of what company they work for? Maybe we can put a tax system in place of union dues, then elect officials to pass labor laws that would apply to everyone. We could call this all encompassing union the U.S. Department of Labor...
Maybe President B.O. will sue the State of Wisconsin the way he's suing the State of Arizona.
neversurrender,
Spot on! I used to live there. I thought this glorious day would never come. Maybe there is hope for the rest of the country?
Sven: I once lived and learned in Madison too. I guess that's where we received our "education" in more ways than one. If they don't like it, fire them! They should thank God that they don't live in Bahrain or Libya. Have a nice day and eat some WI cheese.
Futyler - Great points.
All hard working tax payers in the private sector have had to contribute to 401K's and health care, as well as begin subject to employment at will., for decades. And none of us have automatic wage increases tied to anything.
Why should teachers and workers in the public sector (hard working as they may be) have it any different.
We love you Wisconsin!
The posters above me are obviously not economists. As much as people like to bitch at unionized workers they are getting pensions because they are not being paid a market wage. If you actually had to pay teachers what they would get for having a college degree (including a normal share of employer benefits and 401k) then you'd lose more money than you are now. A study was done recently in California to support this. A teacher in NJ (one of the highest paid states for teachers) after 6 years of teaching makes about $50k a year in salary paying 1.5% of their benefits in. An accountant in NJ with the same amount of experience makes about $110+bonus(about 10k a year) paying in about $500 a month in benefits. The math is such that a teacher is underpaid based upon the market.
Teachers only work 9 months out of the year.
Basedrum...for one thing you are comparing based on time spent on education alone...they are two totally separate industries. That's like saying a biochemical engineer should be on an equal pay scale to a high school guidance counselor.
Also, the teacher works 31 weeks a year, gets tenure, can retire with pension after 20 years at 80% of salary...not to mention I suspect that study took one of the lower paid teaching positions and compared it to a higher paid accountant. I know plenty of accountants that aren't making $110k a year.
On top of that, the study was done in California, a state that is going bankrupt and doesn't have a clue how to manage public sector pay.
Lastly, your statement that unionized workers are not being paid a market wage is exactly incorrect. They are getting more in 8 out of 10 professions.
USA Today is a legitimate newssource wouldn't you say?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-03-04-federal-pay_N.htm
Perhaps a great day for the state of Wisconsin..., and may it be contagious...
the good ones work far more than that...
none of that is true. They work far more than 31 weeks out of the year (just because the kids aren't in during the summer doesn't mean all the teachers just do nothing), and they DO NOT get to retire after 20 years as 80% salary.
So do the math. Even if that's the case the most a teach in my town can make is $103k after getting their doctorate and working more than 25 years on the job.
Even annualizing that value you get $135k. What do you think someone who is already making 110k will be making at that point 25 years into a business?
Ummm...Joe, that "study" is literally my household with myself as the accountant and my wife as the teacher in NJ. She is actually highly paid because she was able to start at step 4 rather than step 1 in her school district to match another districts offer when she graduated college.
And just to be clear this is equating a degree in accounting with a degree in mathematics. I love accounting but I even know that its much much more difficult getting a degree in Math.
And yet you dismiss a study done based upon numbers (not opinions) because it was done in california? A state that by your assertion is probably paying their public employees more than they should be? I would think that would lend more validity to the findings.
WinkWink thinks this is a great day for the American public. Time to end the stranglehold the unions have on society!!!
Trumpka never will allow this law to stand wait for his next "visit" to the White House
basedrum777...
Sorry, pal - but I believe your math is fuzzy and wrong. There are very few teachers in NJ who only make $50K per year. Most make closer to $100k. However, giving you the benefit of doubt, how about the fact that you cannot fire a teacher and the only recourse is to put them in a "rubber" room and let them watch soaps all day and continue to pay them.
Also, for the 36+ years that I worked, I had to put in a minimum of 5% of my salary into my pension. I also had to put in any contributions to my deferred comp. My employer did not match a penny for many, many years in either. Why do teachers deserve better than what I had to do.
Just Saying...
Actually I think we are missing the more broad point of this situation. A court will (probably) never allow this law to stand as is. You can't restrict the ability for people to unionize.
And there's the proof. Democrats seem to think "democracy" is when they get their way, not when the elected officials vote yes or no with a majority winning.
Anyone who entered that field "for the money" went in with the wrong reasons. There's lots of college graduates working at Denny's.
Unions, and particularly public employees unions have had way too much power for way too long. This is a great step in the right direction and a great place to start cutting the fat. Hopefully this will be highly contagious.
I hope this sets a precedent for other states! I like in California and we are being choked to death by unions!
Our idiot politicians are bought and paid for by the government service unions, and most of the laws drafted in the state are tailored to benefit the unions at the expense of the taxpayers! And we pay some of the highest taxes in the Nation!
Unions need to be put in check! They are necessary when dealing with a large company that could potentially abuse its workers, but if they get too big and too powerful, they become a malignant tumor and begin destroying the host(s) they depend on at the expense of the workers.
Look no further at Airlines, Automotive, Aerospace, Entertainment and Manufacturing to see how unions have driven a ton of business out of the country and reduced the productivity of a lot of more sympathetic or less wealthy companies capable of outsourcing the (in some instances) grossly overpriced labor.
Personally, I don't think that public employees should be allowed to unionize at all...the state is already governed by voters and representatives, CBA's and unionization is redundant and is a conflict of interest against the voters of the state
basedrum777 : This law isn't restricting the people's ability to unionize. Read the article.
For your benefit, since you did not read the article:
Another part of that quote that is very intersting is that these people would be paid in accordance with this "index", which means it's probably based on some average... and more importantly if they want raises beyond this index - as a group - it has to come as a descision from the voters. That's a unique step that eliminates potential party loyalty of unions to Democrats.
Otherwise, when your state's budget isn't balanced... something has to give. This is only a part of their budget shortfall... only 300 million of some 3.6 billion. I think that for what they are trying to pass... requiring these public employees to put more money towards their own benefits instead of "taxpayers"... that it's a hell of a lot better than simply firing 6,000 teachers. After all... education is important.
Real substance to criticizing this move will come in the future and what other areas they target to make up the remaining 3.3 billion dollars they are missing.
In my state... or rather Commonwealth, they slashed out a lot of public programs to cover the gap... people weren't happy about it, but the budget got balanced and I think everybody is happy about that. They need to give up on the whining... be grateful somebody is willing to work a solution to help them keep their jobs.
I think our President should assume military control over the US of A, given that so many states are claiming to be in a state of emergency.
Unions have become the tyrannical monsters that the old corporations once were. They wield their power and use their resources to crush otherwise sound economic proposals that don't favor them. Unfortunately, it's just another sign of the times that we can longer find a middle ground for constructive bargaining, instead of being forced to extreme measures. The Unions brought this upon themselves because the writing has been on the wall for decades. The police and firefighters unions must be included as well!
Sorry unions, but you're now in a world where you can no longer have your cake and eat it too!
basedrum777, at 110K with only 5 years experience you are a very well paid accountant. Most accountants (even ones in Jersey) don't even come close to that in their careers. You must work for an investment bank in north Jersey or something.
Well, Wisconsin will soon be a Democratic state.
I live in Milwaukee, nice way to go Walker and thank you republicans. I hope we all will enjoy what's coming up, Next is to get rid of Minimum wages, get rid of the labor laws then companies can pay you as low as they want maybe $2 per hour like in China I mean $2 per day and no companies will send jobs over sea. I don't care because I have enough money and it actually gonna save me money. It is a win for WI and America HEHEHEHE.
There was a time where the workers needed a voice but that time has passed and I agree Unions are a big problem, with threats of work stoppage to get their way is extortion plain and simple, and I'm a DEMOCRAT .. not all democrats favor unions!
Reusable bag fan: I think our President should assume military control over the US of A, given that so many states are claiming to be in a state of emergency.
I think he'd like nothing better. Beats having to come up with (and hide) his 200,000-member Praetorian Guard.
Beware of what you ask for. You are shhoting at people doing jobs for the ingrateful public. In my humble opinion, teachers should make 3 to 4 times what they are now making. Kids and their parents are A-holes.
Take away one of the only good points to the job and nobody will do it.
Someone on this post mentioned the un-employed workers will jump at the job. Think about this.... what are we going to be getting? Most of the teachers now have master's degrees.
Teachers are needed and unappreciated, this will kill the profession.
I am a 21 year member of a union that is affiliated with the AFL-CIO. A small, but growing group of members like me have been advocating with our unions for years to work with local governments to help solve the fiscal problems and not make them worse.
1. We realize that if we get everything we want our taxes go up just like everyone else.
2. For every dollar a Democrat gives a union, they take two back in taxes.
3. Unless we get the state, and federal budgets under control our pensions mean nothing. Uncontrolled spending leads to massive inflation and massive inflation makes our pensions and savings worthless.
The only thing my union has done for me for over the years is take nearly 15 thousand in union dues from me. Had I been able to keep this money in an account, with compounding interest over the years I would have a nice pot of money. Instead, my dues were used in part to promote democrat candidates and bail out bad employees who should have been fired long ago.
My union agressively fought the state when it switched all state employees from a defined benifit to a defined contribution (401k) style retirement years ago. In hindsite, that switch to a 401k has kept my state from an all but certian bankruptsy in the future which.... would have ruined the pensions for all those retired, and in the old system.
Good for WI. They are doing what they need to do to protect the taxpayers, AND state workers. By shutting down the schools they are enraging countless parents working multiple jobs who now have to take time off work (lose money) so that the union can throw a fit like a bunch of entitled babies. YOU ARE MAKING IT WORSE FELLOW UNION MEMBERS! wake up and see your union leadership for who they really are DEMOCRATIC goons!
And they have a choice to take their salary on a nine month cycle or on an 12 month cycle. If they choose the 9 month plan, they take home more each month but have to fend for themselves over the summer. If they take the 12 month plan they get less each month, with the extra being used to stretch over the summer months. Either way the salary is the same.
Now then, as for those nine months of work, if you haven't been in a public classroom recently you have no idea how difficult the task of teachers has become. The students are, by and large, disrespectful, lazy and rude. There is very little that the teacher or the administration can do to impose serious consequences on students for disruptive behavior besides send them to detention centers, which they consider to be a vacation from class.
The parents don't support the teachers because almost every time you have a problem with a child and attempt to contact a parent they are either unavailable (after intentionally changing their phone number to avoid calls about their nightmare kid) or if you do manage to get someone on the line the first response is always "Well what did you do to get my kid in trouble?" and second, "What do expect me to do?" How about discipline your kid and teach them some proper respect?
Most of the disruptive behavior and negative attitude is a result of kids being placed in classes such as freshman Algebra, (the lowest level math class we are allowed to offer), which they are woefully unprepared for. The kids don't know their basic multiplication facts, they add and subtract by counting on their fingers, and I'm supposed to teach them algebra? And then, when they don't understand it, it's because I'm an ineffective teacher who's tenure should be revoked?
Instead of putting so much unreasonable pressure on teachers to manage a nightmarish classroom of disruptive students who don't care and aren't interested in learning because they know they'll be automatically promoted to the next grade no matter what, how about we end social promotion policies which keep moving these kids through the system when they haven't even mastered basic skills?
Seriously! The first thing this corporate shill (Governor) did in office was give large corporations massive tax breaks. Why does this all sound familiar! According to several independent sources what had been essentially budget "neutrality" become a short fall!!! Guess who is making up the difference - working Americans. But that isn't the only reason why you will see this trend going Nation wide - the Republican's are going after the collective bargaining of "all" state and federal workers because they have traditionally supported the Democratic Party. This is POLITICS
dressed up as fiscal austerity (Carl Rove said as much - the only honest thing he has ever said)! Corporations will in the end be the only entities that benefit from Citizens United and armies of lobbyists. Wake up people - in the end they will privatize everything including the police and the fire department. Your house will burn if you missed a payment and Black Water will be the local constabulary. You think I'm joking - when it is all done and said America will have the look and feel of a some science fiction movie where morally bankrupt and yes overtly evil corporations are the government and run everything! Are economy was tanked by Republican deregulation and Corporate greed and now there using the outcome as a pretext for going after American workers!
'Scuse me, I live in NJ. Depending on where in the state and what union, you could be talking $42K or $62 to start. Could be 0 they have to pay in for benefits or it could be 5%. Ten years ago, my nephew-in-law in northern NJ was $78K and his wife (also a teacher) was $72K. Each had only been hired into their districts for a couple of years. 0 for benefits. 9 months a year. He was sucking the system dry for free master's degree, and later his doctorate for free thru another state's system.
It used to be that engineers were likely to be the highest paid coming straight out of college, it changed over to teachers several years ago. The teachers beat out what was once an average of college grads at $36K/year.
So here I sit in the private sector (yes, had college), barely hitting $35K for a full year and paying what amounts to 20% for my benefits.
So, let's get rid of the unbelievable union benefits (extorted), fix the wage scale, gov't workers have to contribute toward benefits. Before we even do that, we should get rid of all the excess administrators. Example, one of my local middle schools of 900 students has 3 vice principals, one for each grade. Dump 2 and save at least $250K a year.
So people, wake up and talk with your neighbors. Each of us has a story to tell and info to share.
The interesting dilemma here is that the parasites that have been feeding off of the host's resources are starting to get too big and requisitioning too many resources.
Just like viruses and bacteria in the human body. There are some organisms that are able to operate symbiotically with the host. But it's a delicate balance.
Well, in the case of the government, the host is dying. Unions and corporations are now consuming too many of the host's resources (i.e. taxpayer wealth and the middle class).
Unions seek not the employment and safety of their workers but only to sustain the power of the union over their host company/government.
Corporations seek ever-greater handouts and even more lax regulations. Considering that over 50% of the Fortune 500 companies pay less than half of the effective corporate tax rate is just the tip of the iceberg. The SCOTUS-Citizens United and corporate personhood decisions are the beginning of the end for public representation and what's left of a fair election process.
We are rapidly approaching the grand crescendo that is the current US.
I figure in about 100 years, people will be so fed up by the situation that a massive reboot of the US government and it's representatives will occur. It will either look like the French Revolution or India gaining freedom from the British.
Lord knows how long the reboot will take however. Feudalism took centuries to end...I cringe at the thought of how long a corporate oligarchy will last
Unions do not work for the workers anymore they are an instrument for politicians to get support from union members and their dues, even many of them do not agree, how much money from unions go to support corrupts politicians to get in power , this mob of fat socialist do not care about how much money ( our money ) the government has to spend giving privileges to government workers , that we private employee do not have. Pass the Bill.
Seriously? . . . No Really?!
I live in Cali too, and if you think BOTH parties are not bought and paid for, then you need to read your name again. Democrats are bought and paid for by unions who push for pensions that we can not afford, Republicans are bought and paid for by Corporations who would gladly poison an entire community if it increased their profits. Pick your poison.
Do we have a problem with unions? Yes, the pension plans will probably bankrupt the state. Something needs to be done. Does that mean I am willing to elect a Republican who wants to eliminate the EPA so that corporations can pollute our beaches even more? HELL NO. I happen to enjoy swimming and surfing in the ocean.
And you can not blame unions for outsourcing, there were plenty of PRIVATE (non-union) businesses here in Cali that outsourced thousands of jobs. Even if you eliminate all unions, the outsourced labor is still cheaper. Remember, it all comes down to profits.
Both parties have their dark sides. We need to find a middle ground. BTW . . . I am a liberal who voted for a Republican governor.
Rodney, you make some good points. Glad to see someone gets it. I wonder if other members realize how they have been bled over the years by their own unions, because it's just another tax. It's privately run, but just another bureaucracy with occasional ties to the mob.
The interesting dilemma here is that the parasites that have been feeding off of the host's resources are starting to get too big and requisitioning too many resources.
"Just like viruses and bacteria in the human body. There are some organisms that are able to operate symbiotically with the host. But it's a delicate balance.
Well, in the case of the government, the host is dying. Unions and corporations are now consuming too ma"ny of the host's resources (i.e. taxpayer wealth and the middle class)."
WOW. That sounds like it came from Der Ewige Jude, a propaganda film made in Nazi Germany that compared the Jews to rats - parasites on the German people. I'm just saying...
Rodney, thank you, some of know that there are many unionized workers who are thinking the same thing. Unfortunately, they're too afraid to say it due to backlash from their union and fellow workers.
Collective bargaining is one thing (and HR depts like it because it's one or two CBAs vs. individual agreements), but the unions suck everybody dry.
skelm wrote;
And they are paid for nine months out of the year, with the payments made across twelve months. The nine months that teachers work include evening after evening of creating lesson plans and grading papers, not to mention the endless worry about students who are sick or not performing up to ability. Try marrying a teacher: It will open your eyes.
Hopefully the people won't fold when the unionist (socialist) continue blackmailing the to get their way. I'm going to be taxed out of my house soon due to the high taxes which currently just under 70% goes to the schools. If they think that what Governor Walker is so unfair then quit and go into the private sector where you have to work and perform for your monies and you get less than half the benefits.
Walker for five more terms!
Union bashing is popular, but the level of Wisconsin eliminating it is dumb. And it is perfect that the opening post mentions Arizona, a state of the stupid when it comes to dealing with problems.
Again, you can in fact, blame the Fed for not dealing with problems. Unions have become bloated. Those of us who live in NJ are well familiar with the overpaid status of teachers and financial crisis. The difference, if I don't say so myself, is that the governor here is much more intelligent in the way he is dealing with it. Unions should never be eliminated, mainly because it makes no difference to 'eliminate' unions. At its most fundamental level, a union is simply a group of people that refuses to work as a negotiating tool. You can cry 'illegal' all you want...when you don't have workers show up, it really doesn't mean that you can get the job done.
Let's take an example: Reagan with the Air Traffic Controllers. Now, by the way, Reagan was absolutely right in firing all those workers. However, they were able to be replaced, though it wasn't easy. When it comes to a state of teachers, there is a number that you can reach in which kids simply couldn't go to school. Whether you get enough teachers to walk out depends on what kind of deal they are getting. Ultimately, its a union whether you call it that or not.
Anyway, trying to wrap this up: Unions have too much negotiating power, and that is what has made taxpayers angry. However, in any state with common sense, power has been pulled away from the unions by public education on abusive union tactics and having a backup plan for workers on strike. Perfect example: NYC's MTA union. Last time they had a strike, they bankrupted themselves and went right back to work because they weren't willing to deal with going to jail. If they were, they would have went to jail, but probably forced the city to capitulate. Obviously, there was a line they weren't willing to cross, and they haven't raised a fuss since. Transit is different fromteaching, but both are necessiteis in one way or another.
mikey mike, Do not blame the parents for all of this. If the government (including school administration) would stay out of child raising then teachers would not have disrespectful BRATS in classrooms. The teachers in the state that I raised my children were not allowed (by school policy) to discipline children, even tho, the state law said they could. I had to drive 28 miles one way from work to correct my child for misbehaving in class. Because, school policy stated the teacher could not. When I snatched my 6' 16 year old off the floor and made him sit in his desk the teacher warned me I could be charged with abuse. When I asked my son why he did it he said, because he could and there was nothing the teacher could do about it. So DON'T BLAME THE PARENTS,!!!
I've never been in a Union, but my husband has although it wasn't his choice. If he wanted the job, he had to be in the Union. Nice scam, eh?
Yes, historically unions had a place, but now with all the laws protecting workers rights they are nothing but organizations of intimidation and corruption.
Florida Teacher,
I agree with you 100%. What a sad day for America and Democracy.
You show me one good teacher and I can show you 10 that are there just because of the union and not because they are good. 90% of the problem in the school system is because the teachers go to the union and say we won't do this to teach the children, we can't do this to teach the childern, this isn't the way to teach the children. Thats why we don't have READING, WRITING, MATH taught properly anymore, because it might just show that a teacher is incapable of doing the job so they have the union to back them to keep them in the job. Now you will have to do your job and for the money you are paid no more will you be able to hold the children of this country hostiage so you can make more money! Try Walmart!
Good for you WI! Unions are only there as a political machine and to protect poor workers. Hopefully this catches on for other states.
basedrum777, you can't say math teachers are underpaid because accountants make more. Your apple to orange comparison doesn't make sense.
True, you can't restrict the ability of people to unionize, but that's not what's happening here. You can do what Governor Walker is doing (assuming the Republican controlled state legislature passes it) which is diminish the power of those unions.
This is what happens when you run out of "Other Peoples Money". Govenment employees are a joke. They expect everything for free from other people. I get raises if i do a good job and make the company money, not for just being employed by the government no matter what kind of job im doing or how the economy is. Their is no way i could get a raise with this economy if my company was struggling. I have to pay for my own insurance and retirement plan. But these government employees want someone else to pay for theirs and they dont just want it they expect it. Then they run around crying and whinning when they dont get it.
Where I live its really a joke the government has their retirement set up where they actually get paid more for retiring than they do when they were working. All paid for by the taxpayer and every election they want to raise our taxes to pay for it. Well this is just the beginning, their is only so much OPM to go around. People have had enough especially with this economy when some people cant afford to pay for their own retirement or insurance but have to pay for governments.......
Elections have consequences (isn't that what the organizer in chief said?) ,,so hey libs take a long chug of 'Shut the Hell Up!!
For those who support this - can someone explain to me why Police, State Police and Fire Depts were excluded?
If republicans were really serious about the budget, and that was ALL this was about - this would most definitely apply to them as well.
Im a little curious as to reasoning they were excluded.
They want to take the vote but no Democrat Lawmaker will show up.How Professional?
There is no reason for state employees to be represented by collective bargaining agreements. Unions served their purpose in the days of packing houses and steel mills. Protecting uneducated employees from greedy employers and unsafe working conditions was necessary 75 years ago.
College educated teachers and state workers only use unions to extort ever increasing salaries and benefits from the rest of us WHO PAY FOR THEIR SALARIES AND BENEFITS!!!!
Congratulations Wisconsin. Once again you are the first. This is change we can believe in and change that is coming to all Federal, State, and municipal workers.
I respect everything that unions did in the early part of the 20th century to make working conditions and wages livable, but so many unions have become power hungry demanding more and more unsustainable benefits for their members. Not just public sector unions, but private sector as well. My uncle is a retired union member (UAW). He has an 8th grade education, worked the line all his life, and told me stories of all the goofing off they used to do on the job. I have a business degree and work 60+ hours a week and have to make decisions that can affect millions of dollars and peoples livelihoods, but my fairly good salary for this is still $5,000/year less than my Uncle's pension pays him and he has health benefits for life too. Ever wonder why cars are so expensive? Here's one of the reasons.
Just for the record, the average salary of those affected by Governor Walker's proposal is around $55,000, which is a very livable salary here in Wisconsin. From everything I'm hearing, this is slightly below the average that private sector teachers make here in Wisconsin, but the private sector benefits package doesn't even come anywhere even remotely close to the benefits packaged that they receive. I wish I had exact numbers to quote, but I do know a teacher that retired at 55, and was earning $4100/month from her pension and has a great health package. I think teachers should be well compensated, but I just don't see how the current compensation levels are sustainable.
I don't agree with most of Walkers politics, and I certainly don't agree with the heavy-handed way he approached this or the fact that he exempted the three unions that supported him, but many of us Wisconsinites voted for him because he demonstrated that he was willing to make the hard decisions that needed to be made. Asking teachers to pay a small portion of their health package and pension is in no way an unreasonable request, and far better for everyone than the alternative which was laying off 12,000 of them. MSNBC and other outlets are focusing on the crowds raising their voice against this in Madison, but the silent majority of us believe that these cuts need to happen.
Teachers do not HAVE to join the National Education Association, nor their respective state association, or their local.
They can opt out of that. But as a teacher I will tell you that if there is no place at the table for negotiating salary, etc., then your schools will be stacked with unqualified people who will work for whatever a state's governor deems fair.
You can bitch and moan all you want. It is not unions. They protect rights, such as time breaks, safe working conditions, etc.
Hell - although I will have to suffer along with the rest of you, I think I would like to laugh my ass off when the Republicans tank the economy again and screw up our schools, making this a third world nation.
And how did all this get out of hand? When a black man was elected President. And we seem to think we should tell other countries how wonderful our democracy is. What a joke.
This quote from Einstein suits most of you: There are two things that are infinite: human stupidity and the universe. And I'm not sure about the universe.
Einstein had it right. The spread of stupidity is rampant, and there is no cure.
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - BLAME THE VICTIM! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
if we don't learn from history before unions, companies would just shot employees for organizing used pinkertan to do it. just like the miner down south guess who shot them for the company the goverment.
looks like we will be doing it all over again. walker going to use the national guard how will he pay for them.
I bet you Gov Walker will be getting sized up for a Kevlar Suit if this thing passes.
bubba "You show me one good teacher and I can show you 10 that are there just because of the union and not because they are good."
thats funny, because i've only ever worked private sector jobs...and this holds true there as well. not because of unions, but because of crappy management.
and thats what it boils down to in public sector work, I know that they can be fired - it's just that power tends to corrupt, and those in power tend not to want to fire the people they like.
Working with the boss' daughter, who is worthless and plays on facebook all day...who shows up at 8:20 daily, takes a lunch and leaves at 4:30...and took off 35 days last year (she only gets 16)...i know im speaking the truth. If her dad didnt work her, she most likely would have been fired long time ago.
But inept management keeps her employed...same with many public sector workers.
You should be demanding better management, and at least with public sector (unlike private) thats something we can demand, and expect, and achieve if we collectively cared about it.
Jessica-1170252
It has to start somewhere......
Most of the teachers now a day dont try to give the kids an education they just try to brainwash them into their liberal agenda's....
R U 1 "I don't agree with most of Walkers politics, and I certainly don't agree with the heavy-handed way he approached this or the fact that he exempted the three unions that supported him, but many of us Wisconsinites voted for him because he demonstrated that he was willing to make the hard decisions that needed to be made."
I think you just contradicted yourself there and didn't realize it. He clearly didnt make the hard decision if he chose to exclude Police, State Police and Fire from this...ya know, the folks who supported him.
Just politics as usual, union busting is more accurate.
They are the only threat to Citizens United, because they were the only "force" that could rival a corporations ability to spend on campaigns...and this is the first step in killing that.
*golf clap
We've are officially entering FACISM.
Stealth - it's akin to me cutting my netflix bill and saying im "cutting back on spending"
But hey, I started somewhere, right?
I have a college degree in education, but I used it for only 3 yrs before I realized that I could never make any money, and had to find a new career. (By the way I was NEVER in a public school system) I am now closer to retirement than college, and make less than $15 an hour. Do I think government workers whould pay more for their pensions and insurence? yes. But can someone please explain to me how not being able to collectively bargain is going to SAVE the State of Wisconsin one thin dime. If this is a purely budget bill, then only things that save money should be in there.
I realize that many of you think unions are bad. But even though there are laws in place now to cement the rights the unions won for all of us, don't you realize that those are just that? LAWS. Laws can be changed anytime someone has the votes to do it. That is exactly what is happening here in Wisconsin right now. The state passed a law in 1959 giving the workers the right to collectively bargain. Now they want to pass a new law taking that same right away. If it can be done here and now with collective bargaining, why can it not be done with minimum wage, 40 hour work week, worker safety and anything else they can think of.
By the way I am not now, and never have been a member of a union, but I am afraid of what our country will be like when they are allowed to break all the unions.
@ Thoughts from Cali
Considering how many union CBA's have been tailored to safeguard pensions, healthcare and effectively tenure their senior members at the expense of the junior ones, I'd say that unions play a fairly major role in the incentive of a company to outsource, or a state to go bankrupt!
But indeed, many corporations are also deserving of a significant share of the blame! If you notice my entire post, you'll see that I have a firm contempt for both Left and Right...neither party is on the side of the American people!
Left wants the illegal alien (and sympathiser) vote (by abusing the 14th amendment) to bypass moderate Democrats trying to protect themselves from the awful externalities of rampant illegal immigration. While I agree with some of the Democrat's social policies with regard to a non-secular government and personal responsibility, and think that the Democrats have a better grasp on regulation and fiscal matters, I despise the handout-agendas that would allow many to be on welfare in perpetuity and others to exploit our country's generocity who have no desire to be American.
The Right wants to abuse the poor and middle classes to effectively fuel the corporate equivalent of feudalism, and in order to partly do that, they too take a lax stance on illegal immigration, lest they mobilize the Latino demographic to start voting against them (or at all for that matter). I can't stand the Republican party's social conservative, government-invasion of privacy and legislation of morality, and I recognize that while I like some of the GOP's economic agendas, they never follow them, and it's all just lipservice to increase corporate welfare/handouts.
I grew up in the barrio in Southern California. I have first hand knowledge and experiences for what it's like to see neighborhoods go down hill because of unfettered illegal immigration. Schools becoming crowded and underfunded because almost no one is paying property taxes. Hospitals in the area closing their emergency units because over 20% of the people coming in don't pay their bills, the crime, etc etc etc.
To anyone sympathetic to illegal immigrants, I highly recommend you move to Pacoima, Arleta, Sylmar, Panorama City, or East LA or the Inland Empire. That is what happens to the neighborhoods!
We need to get rid of as much government as posible they dont contribute or produce anything to the economy all they do is add to the deficate. Until we get rid of all this liberal coruption in the school systems teachers should be the first to get cuts with a bad economy....
Jessica - i beleive the logic of fire/police/Emergency being exempt is those are public saftey issues. People of all walks of life tend to not like public saftey being messed with. That is just my hypothesis though, i dont know if that is the hard line being towed.
Thanks to unionism and socialism, America has not produced a single SLR camera for over 50 years, no consumer electronic goods for almost the same period, and no athetic shoes for over twenty years. Once upon a time, America had a healthy auto industry. Today, Chrysler, twice bankrupt, is owned by Italian Fiat. GM, risen from the dead, is limping toward a recovery at half of its former self. Ford is mired in debt trying to stay competitive. America can thank the UAW for the remaining auto manufacturing factories. American garment workers are not so lucky. Nearly all apparels sold in America are made in Asia, Mexico, or Caribbean.
Unionism and socialism have also formed a new breed of gangsterism with Big Government. The gangsterism has bought corruptable politicians who pushed through anti-business regulations that ultimately cause the unemployment of millions of low-skilled laborers whose skill can not be compensated at minimum wage plus benefits. To make things worse, excessive regulations and high taxes levied by Big Government to support more social programs are additional disincentives to domestic manufacturing.
Run by gangsterism, America is no longer a land of the free but more akin to the former USSR.
Just so I understand this correctly: Companies should have the right to the first amendment and be allowed to give as much money as they want to the political process without disclosing who they are. And workers should not have collective bargaining power to make their lives better.
I sure hope the CEO's and the multi-millionaires treat us fairly this time!
Citizen K
My eyes are wide open thank you very much. My husband works 6 days a week, 10 hours a day and doesn't make much more than a teacher. In fact, if you take into account the pensions and insurance plans, he makes far less because he does not have a pension and we pay for 60% of our own insurance. He has worked for the same company for 30 years and will not be able to retire with a pension, nor do they offer a 401k, we've had to do it all on our own and guess what? WE HAVE. On top of that we worked our butts off to send our children to private school and still paid taxes to the public schools!
And answer this question - why can a private school provide a far superior education for almost half the cost of a public shool? Do you think the over the top benefits have something to do with that?
Why is it that Obama ran away from the voucher program like a cat from a bathtub? Because he knows that given the opportunity of private vs public, the private will win out everytime, which is the way it should be.
I would say the overwhelming majority of teachers DO care about their students and quality of work they do. I see a lot of issue with the systems..that include the school boards, teachers, and communities... that act as road blocks to sound strategies in education.
I alsobelieve the unions could care less about the the students or the communities and as such give full support to the State of Wisconsin in passing this legislation. The union isn't being taken away.. just much of the power they have acquired over the years is and its being given back to the people.
Nice Job WI!
I work in the timber industry and ive had to deal with my kids coming home from public school telling me what teachers are saying about me in school. They sit their and tell complete lies to the kids at school and they dont get in trouble for it. Ive talked to pricipals and they say their not suppose to be doing that but yet nothing is ever done about it because i get it every year from atleast one teacher.
Ive been called a murder of the forest, Im destroying the environment, we kill every animal in sight if we can. Last year my son was told for every tree i cut down 5 deer or animals are killed. Hes been told we are suppose to replant 5 trees for everyone cut but they never replant anything. They say we are going to run out of air to breath if this is not stopped.
This is all a bunch of crap they can get a way with teaching this to kids in schools with no facts what so ever. My kids dont buy any of it and actually got sent to the office for disputing it with one of the teachers. But kids that dont know any better by not having parents or family in the bussiness are just getting brainwashed by all these lies......
A few more thoughts from a union perspective:
Police and Fire were exempted from this regulation because the State can not allow them to strike, so they must be represented. However, their contracts will be based upon the wage scales of the other state workers, so it really doesn't change much by exempting them from this regulation, and it prevents them by law and contract from striking.
(q) Another tid-bit. Want to know why the unions supported Obama's Health care reform when 99.8% of full time union members already have access to quality health care?
(a) Because HCR forces everyone to purchase health care, and employers to provide it or pay a penalty. A union shop that bids a contract to "build a school" is at a disadvantage against a non-union shop that will always bid the job lower, because the non-union shop has lower pay and benefits. This is simply another cost passed down to the taxpayer as a result of HCR. Your future property taxes will be higher for the bonds you approve due to HCR...wait and see.
@skelmbc - Very nice example! Why don't we all try working hard to acquire our pieces of the American dream vs. paying into a group of lobbyists who are demanding they deserve MORE.
Great job of taking ownership of your freedom.
So are we to take this as some sort of threat of violence from the left, the unions, the teachers, or all three if they have to take a decrease in pay? This is very interesting. I thought it was just the right wing nutjobs that threatened to shoot people.
Amazing, just amazing.
Wisconsin teachers letting their students out of class to go to the PROTEST and some of the students don't even know what they are attending. I wonder if the teachers gave them "credit" for attending this rally ?
If you look at other videos (one posted below), you notice some of the "sideline" cheerleaders are probably teachers themselves directing the activities of these students at the protest.
Our educational system is certainly down the tubes, but what the hey, this is the birthplace of Progressive-ism.
15,000 ? You do realize that would not even fill one end zone section of Lambeau Field. Kinda weak for a blue state. Ah, we all miss the 60's when the Left knew how to protest. Remember Chicago, Daily,bashing some heads, the good ol'days.
And what about the children? All those teachers denying all those children an education. What about the poor children who now will go hungry without their Michelle Obama breakfast, lunch, and dinners? If their parents are forced to feed them they might get fat !
Unions are killing Wisconsin children !
Hey, this is fun acting like a Democrat.
I don't see a lot of intelligent comments on this article.
Teachers don't need a union to collectively not show up for work. They just don't show up. Republicans in Wisconsin will get this bill passed. The problem is, it will probably be reversed and this group of Repubs will lose their jobs. Democrats will once again take WI.
Personally, I don't see why WI doesn't take a hint from here in NJ. You don't have to eliminate teachers unions. You simply have to cut the budget. If they want to strike over it, they'll lose because the public isn't on their side. They'll then get paid what they are supposed to, instead of some bloated mess. Wisconsin Republicans and Democrats seem to want to get a lot of attention paid to their egos, and in this case, it has given the Democrats a chance to be popular.
My Step Mother is a retired High School English Teacher for the State of California. Not only that she also served as President of the California Teachers Association.
She worked 9 months out of the year. However during the nine months that she did work, she had a portion of her salery held back and receive that portion for the three months that school was out.
I can't believe so many of you "don't get" why this bill in on the floor. Over the past several years, many taxpayers have either lost jobs, or have less income than they did 3 years ago. Yet, these same people are supposed to continue to pay for Public sector Union increased wages and benefits. Many states are strapped for money due to the downturn. It is about the money, it is not there, yet the Unions demand that their members continue to receive just as much as before. Where does the Union think the state is going to get the money?
Teachers should no longer be allowed to be Unionized. It is totally irresponsible to have a "sick-out." This is an extremely bad example to the children they teach. It is time for the Unions to go, they are now more a negative influence than a positive influence in America.
Seems most here are not differentiating between Private Sector Unions and Public Sector Unions and speaking of Unions in general. Big difference folks. These private sector unions are way out of hand and the teacher's union is high on the list. Gov. Cuomo...are you taking notes?
unions have long out-lived their usefulness. Be gone with yourselves!
Joe, "Also, the teacher works 31 weeks a year, gets tenure, can retire with pension after 20 years at 80% of salary...not to mention I suspect that study took one of the lower paid teaching positions and compared it to a higher paid accountant. I know plenty of accountants that aren't making $110k a year."
====
.....Just to add, I have almost 5 years as an accountant with my company, and I make less than $40K/yr (I also have an MBA, but after being forced out of my job at age 56, I had to take what I could get, I was lucky to get this). I was a taxpreparer for HR Block for several years, and prepared returns for educators with over 6 figure incomes (no, of course not all teachers make that much, but it is not as draconian as some people make it sound, there were others who did quite well, one guy drove up in his BMV convertible roadster).
....Asking public employees/teachers to contribute a small percentage to their pensions and health care is not unreasonable, I cannot sympathize with their reaction to it. I would love to contribute to my pension plan, but my company doesn't have one. My wife contributes a large % to her health care premiums, but luckliy she has one, because my company also does not provide one of those as well.
....Finally, since Illinois (where I have the misfortune to live, but I do have retirement property in WI) is the closest state to Madison WI, their wayward legislators probably headed on down to Springfield, where they probably fit right in, the public employee and teachers unions are strangling Illinois.
# 1 restored for clarity.
Great. Get rid of all the teachers and let the children learn from the chronically unemployed. What better way to learn valuable job skills.
If you think education is expensive, try illiteracy.
Unions had their place and time,we can no longer afford them. Firemen, Policemen, State-troopers are no more important than any other job. People choose their field to work in, and shouldn't be exempt from this vote. No Union employee should be exempt!!! It's only pandering for money and votes during election time. The unions bosses are glorified bouncers. Have you ever watched how a union goes about trying to unionize a workplace? It is shameful with their strong arm tactics.
Let people vote each year if they want to be in a union or not!!! We can't afford them anymore.
SHAME ON THE DEMOCRATS, THE REPUBLICANS NEVER PICKED UP AND LEFT THE FLOOR. SHAME ON OBAMA
those who can.....do
those who can't.....teach
those who can't teach......teach gym
I live in a country full of house neggirs. Yeah, decency for the masses is a threat to us all. The only way to solve the problems is to go back to serfdom. We can't let the weathy accumulators pay their share of anything. That would be un american. You folks kill the unions. Years later, let's here you cry out. You will. You fools. Set a cap on yearly income and subject the overage to 100%. Why do you think that tearing down your compatriots aides you in your struggle? I think it's that you all accept the corruptness of the capitalist system (or any system) and just want to be the top. Why don't you work for equity. As if the foundation is less important than the penthouse. Get real. You sell yourselves.
Republican lemmings. The income of the middle class has gone down at exactly the same time as unions have decreased in membership and corporate profits have gone up. Time after time management said no to raises, so instead unions bargained for benefits and greater security, healthcare, something all American workers want, indeed had, not so long ago before all the mega tax cuts. It is also true that the private sector paid more, typically. Now corporations have eliminated pensions, eliminated unions, said no to minimum wages, and completely disrespected the labor of middle class Americans. Public unions have been holding the line in their communities. They have given back, they have not been receiving exorbitant wages. Their contracts have been negotiated with Republican administrations as well as Dem's. Corporations long ago raided pensions they claimed were "overfunded", now no one except the ultra fat cats get them. So now there exists contracts which the Republicans want overturned because of corporate ideology. Republican created depression, no problem, blame unions, Democrats, minorities, everyday working Americans, everyone except the almighty Corporation and Wall Street. Why do Republicans hate Public Unions? because they're the only jobs they can't outsource. No problem, eliminate public unions, eliminate government, keep the tax cuts for the wealthy, give them free reign, we all know how well they create jobs here. They wanted this depression so workers remain cowed.
Precisely the way the Liberals do each time something doesn't go their way. They either sue to overturn the election, smear the Right for doing the right thing and trying to stop the Liberals and Communists running the DNC, or leave the State as they did in OK a few years ago, to avoid the vote and show exactly how spineless they really are.
Can't act individually, they run in groups as the Rats they are, acting their way in your face, and killing America behind your backs. It's about time someone stood up against the Unions, especially the Public sector with the NEA and Obama's bigtime buddies the SEIU draining what's left after the Liberal rape of our collective Treasuries.
Only good Union is a Bankrupt Union, although they are all moraly Bankrupt to begin with. Whatsa matta, Dems, 'fraid of Louie and his friends with those lead pipes?
Oh poor teachers! Ever work a customer service position? Try retail? Waitress? How about construction? Hey, I'm sorry you poor teachers don't have a classroom full of pretty, attentive students that worship every word. Welcome to the real world.
On top of that, this isn't just about teachers. What about all the janitorial staff for the state, the road workers, parks, etc?
Yes, all the liberal press is reporting is the "poor overworked teacher". Nothing about the road construction worker that took 6 breaks from leaning on his shovel for 8 hours to go have a smoke because those are "union rules". Nothing about the pension double dippers. Noo....we'll just put the "poor children that will lose so much' up in the spotlight and ignore the rest of it.
By the way, I am disgusted by the liberal press and their selective newsreporting (not defending Fox either....it would be nice to see someone actually report rather than twist everything).
This is heavy handed as regards removing all negotiating rights. It's also heavy handed if there are exempted unions and really heavy handed if corporations are given tax breaks and not expected to contribute to the welfare of the state. Having said that, I don't see where unionized folks should rely on tax payer largesse in order for them to live better than the average tax payer. They should contribute to their pension and healthcare funds. If they are protesting because they have to pay their fair share then shame on them.
sorry Basedrum...any "study" or "report" from Kookifornia is questionable at best
the bill does not take away their right to negotiate "salary"...but does address the states inability to continue to "freestyle" on all the benefits....THEY ARE BROKE...albeit not as broke as liberal kingdoms such as Kookifornia and New Dork, but broke just the same.
Marry one? Hell, I won't even date one.
Who knew that public employees are now the new rich that do not want to pay their fair share or sacrifice for the sake of the country even as they receive hugh bonuses in the millions? LOL
Who knew that the public employees are the cause of the housing and financial markets/wall street crash or implosion? LOL
Many folks who are posting are just shill, trolls, lobbiests etc for the republicans/ blue dog democrats/ tea party/wall street/corporations etc.
These folks said the same thing during 2008 through 2009 regarding the auto industry..... blaming the unions and employees saying that the union employees were being paid too much, working too little and earning over 75 thousand dollars per year 'working' on the line..... which was shown to not be true. The auto industry has since recovered and making a profit and have paid back most of the loans.
They said the same about the housing market and the financial market/wall street implosion which pulled down the global economy, blaming it on 'poor' people who were supposed to have bought homes they could not afford..... when it was not true... Some folks said the 'poor folk' comment was supposed to be code word for 'black folks'. LOL
Who knew that there were that many black.... er.....poor folks in the USA buying homes when the financial implosion was due to corporate greed and mis-management.
Now these folks are trying to do the old divide and conquer thing again.... trying to set the middle class folks against each other/blaming the unions or trying to put a wedge between the private sector against the public sector while they toddle off merrily to the bank with their millions in bonuses.
There is even a divide and conquer thing going on trying to pit the old against the young with regards to social security/ medicare/retirement age etc. They even said social security was insolvent -when it isn't and there is a surplus. The impression is that Medicare is free.... when it isn't. Retirees must pay premiums, deductibles and co pays just like any other insurance.
One could say that once the unions are gone/gotten rid of, this country will truly be the United States of Corporate America..... Hmmm
Well folks are seeing first hand that elections have consequences..... LOL
Before anyone jumps on the Republicans are greedy band wagon, read the entire law that has been proposed. It does not break the unions, it does not deny the right of any employee group to unionize or belong to a union. It does strip the collective bargaining power away from the public employee's union with the exception public safety sectors. It is not reducing levels of coverage for retirement or health care but it is requiring that public employees pay a larger contribution to those benefits. No one is losing their health care or pension here, they are simply being asked to contribute more to it. In essence they aren't going to lose that money because they will get it back when they retire or leave public service. Federal law on pensions and 401ks govern that. 25,000 people are an extremely small percentage of the state's population and from watching the reports, most of those were college age young adults. The action taken by the democrats in protest is in essence that of the child that decides to take his ball and go home when he doesn't get his way. The state of Wisconsin should not be running a deficit and it is only in recent years where it has ballooned to the proportions it is today. Most public employees by virtue of their benefits and in most cases their pay scale far out earn those with comparable positions in the private sector whether those positions outside public service are unionized or not.
actually it was Nancy Pelosi that said "we won and they can just get over it".
I just hope all of the union haters will be very happy when they and their children are working seven days a week for fifty cents a day. After all this is the only way we can compete with foreign labor.
There is a simple solution to this. Eliminate the Republicans, then the problem is solved.
mygirl - they did not remove the right to negotiate salary
The big three they removed was
These expenses are out of control and unless capped will multiply faster than wages.
BTW: The Democrats leaving to prevent the vote made a bad choice of Unions over taxpayers.
How soon you forget, the republicrap majority in congress did exactly the thing you so cleverly blame on OUR PRESIDENT. People like you should just shut up and let others drag your sorry asp into the future. Idiots are guaranteed the ability to breed AND LISTEN TO GLENN BECK but there is no guarantee intelligent thought can be derived from such idiots. I say congratulations to people that FINALLY understand WHAT REPUBLICRAP CORPORATE THEOLOGY is all about. Their desire is to force people to work for nothing while they collect the rewards for that slave labor. As so many people look upon our military and all the sacrifice shared by millions due to their combined pain, I look at the pain and sacrifice shared by the millions of people in the labor force that endured the disgrace inflicted upon them by their employers during the fight for union representation. Without unions there would be no OVERTIME PAY, VACATION PAY, HOSPITALIZATION BENEFITS, INSURANCE BENEFITS, AND MANY MANY OTHER GAINS PEOPLE TODAY TAKE FOR GRANTED. Just let the corporate boss do as he pleases, you wouldn't be able to buy a loaf of bread with a day's wages. I said after the stealing of the presidency THE FIRST TIME, I would not vote republicrap again, well now I can say NEVER WILL I VOTE REPUBLICRAP, AND I RESERVE THAT NEVER AS BEING THE FIRST TIME USED.
DB: Thank you for the clairification. I found it interesting to read that union organizers from other states were bussing in protesters to fill the ranks. Also interesting to note that teachers were dragging students along to fill the ranks especially when some of the students interviewed stated that they weren't sure what the protests were all about.
Forwhatistsworth ie, not much: Your statement about eliminating republicans is very telling. Apparently you approve of a one party system similar to that of communist nations and other totalitarian regimes.
mygirl1 And you seem to favor fascism. So aren't we both just overjoyed.
mygirl1.... (glad you're not) On second thought, maybe you do favor a 2 party system. Republicans, and Tea Baggers.
I suppose you might accept a Democrat, as long as their vote was worthless huh?
mygirl1..... And why do we have votes? If not to eliminate those who we believe will not represent us? How many votes do you think it would take to eliminate all of those corporate puppets? 357? 38? I would bet that 44 or 45 would work just fine.
As dandy dan used to say "turn out the lights ,the party is over "
good bye unions....and good riddance !
U A W !
HIDE THE WEED !
BZe1
"Many folks who are posting are just"...you can say it...go ahead...liberal Jethro's
ForWhatitsWorth: seems I touched a nerve...good
DB Akron...... The Union employees ARE taxpayers. Get it?
This Governor is just trying to pull a Ronald McDonald Reagan. Chip, chip, chip.......... send the signal. LOOK WHAT WE DID! What a POS.
Ward Churchill
Billy blow-job
UAW !
STASH THE WEED ! THEY FINALLY FIGURED OUT WHY WE BUILD CRAP !
mygirl1....... Better than a lot of things I bet you've touched.
Really ?
A sexual predator supporter ,you really want to go there ?
CHRYSLER UAW WORKERS ,HIDE THE BONGS ,THEY ARE ON TO US !
Where I've gone and am willing to go, I doubt you have what it takes kraft.
As far as political ploys, this is one of the oldest tricks in the book.
As a young legislator and Whig Party leader, even Abe Lincoln himslef and others tried to escape out a window just before a vote to prevent a quorum when Illinois' State Capitol was Vandalia.
As he matured into a more seasoned political figure, he admitted to regretting that move and I'm sure these Democrats will when they look back on it.
Time to come back and do you job. As much as you don't like it, you have to vote on this piece of legislation or work to have it changed.
Running away from a problem never makes it go away.
A small portions of taxpayers. Evan at peak union membership they never represented much over 35% of the workforce, today they are less than 20% of the workforce.
You shouldn't favore one small portion over the whole - especially when their benefits and retirement are 2 - 3 times better than than the average person.
No.... But it sure slows it down. There are many ways to play when the game is rigged. And you'll notice that Lincoln got into the White House after he did that.
What kind of benefits do you think that the top 2% of the (And I use the term lightly.) "taxpayers" get?
Why would someone be jealous that some other middle class worker gets a few crumbs more than they do? The only reason I can think of aside from someone being a puppet for the "upper class", would be if that person was a total loser and just wanted to bring others down to their level.
I notice that the cowards didn't include the police and fire departments ....YET. I guess they think they may need them shortly.
Awww hell
PROGRESSIVES have been running from responsibility since 1967
Nothing new !
UAW i told you to wait at least a week !
HIDE THE WEED !
I am amazed by all the yelling, this is what the man promised when he ran and I along with a majority of people in Wisconsin voted for him.
So what is the problem? The unions have ran our state to the brink of bankruptcy, all that the people are asked to to pay half what the public worker pays for health care (I believe they pay 1/4 now) and to pay for half the amount that the average worker pays for their retirement fund. Also, since employees of the state do work for the people of the state, then to get raises they need to get it through a vote.
Wow, how radical. Maybe the rest of the states better follow or they will be bankrupt, and I do not feel that the U.S. government should bail them out. If their unions wish to be greedy and bankrupt the state, then deal with the consequences.
DB Akron, Good point about the tax payers!! Also I no longer have no respect for the Teachers union for 2 reasons. First, the union president said that if Walkker get his way, Kids are going to suffer! OMG when did kids become a bargaining chip for the union!!! Second, My granddaughter skip school to protest for the teacher union, after a teacher asked her to do it for her, over 300 kids out of 1800 kids did this today, in Green Bay Wisconsin. Teachers sending kids to protest for the teachers union is wrong!! Talk about a Hitler propaganda style move!!! That teacher needs to be fired and the union needs to be removed for interfering with the education of a child!!! Now she is grounded for a week and she thinks that mom and dad are being disrespectful for not doing what a teacher asked her to do!!! Sounds like the teacher union has our children UNION BRAIN WASHED, SHAME ON YOU TEACHERS AND YOUR DISRESPECTFUL UNION, time to replace them all!!! Our tax dollars at work promoting the teachers union in school is totally unacceptable!!!! GO WALKKER!!!!!
If "Benefits" are a "RIGHT," then where are my RIGHTS? Under what law did benefits become a right to only union members? Sounds like a class action law suit against the unions for discrimination!! Oh the union privileges over the command peasants!!!
Ah, the demoNo party strikes again. Let the unions bankrupt the states and the fed, then see how things go from there.
Sure, everyone wants to be paid more. Unfortunately, those doingthe most whining likely aren't worth what they are paid now. Why? Because they spend too much time whining instead of working.
b dune
"will you show link where Obama said verbatum "now shut up and go sit in the back"?"
dune, the actual quote is “They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.”
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-to-gop-%E2%80%98they-can-come-for-the-ride-but-they-have-to-sit-in-back/
I didn't read the whole article, but I read enough to comment. Maybe the unions have gotten a bad name, but then again, how would you like to work in a Right To Work state? California tried it for 1 year and then it was reversed for good reason. Do you work 10 hours overtime in a week with a holiday and get only 2 hours overtime pay? Do you work 10 hours overtime in a week and only get time and 1/2 for your work? Do you work on a holiday and get standard overtime for it? What work situation pays doubletime? Say goodbye to doubletime. For me, that means I lose a few thousand dollars a year. Are you willing to give up that much because business intrests make the law?
Bob Randall......... That's YOU isn't it?
You Faux news parrots are the most stupid bunch of idiots allowed to have a computer. If they are allowed to bust unions, how long do you think it will be before your non-union job is shipped offshore. This has nothing to do with balancing a budget, it is nothing more than an excuse to execute the marching orders of the rich corporations that want to pay third world wages, and further widen the gap of what their net worth is compared to yours. Here are some facts. When Christine Whitman was elected Gov. of NJ, the first thing she did was give her rich constituents a 10% across the board tax cut. That caused a shortfall in the budget, which she not only raised the cost of motor vehicle charges, she raided the pension fund to cover the shortfall, with a false promise to restore it. She didn't and now the fatman Christie is trying to pretend that pensions of unions are the cause of the states budget woes. Had she left that money alone, the problem wouldn't exist. It was fully funded. However, their plan is to lie, lie and continue lying(worked with WMD's) because it works. Just read the absolutely ignorant, uninformed messages posted here.
Right to work states don't seem to be having the level of economic problems that pro-union states appear to be having. Unions serve a purpose but when the unions essentially control the business then there are problems. What about unions running businesses into the ground with demands that are impossible to meet? Also, when union demands are essentially paid for by taxpayers then there is a problem, especially when the taxpayers are broke.
Forwhateveryou may think its worth: Relax little buddy, you're safe, this is the internet, we're typing here and the only thing of yours that I'll touch is my keyboard in response to your silliness.
Oh yes, And no accumulation of vacation time. If you don't take a vacation this year, do you get the money for the unused time or get the time passed over to the next year? Not here. Use it or lose it. Not 1 hour accumulated from one year to the next. No worker protections in pay matters.
mygirl........ What would you know about "Right to work states"? Most of them are in the south. What has taken place in the last several decades, since corporate greed has out trumped American pride, is big business moved from union states, to the "right to work" states of the south. There, they set up shop for a time to eliminate the unions that were attached to them when they made the move. Once they got that accomplished most of them headed a little bit farther south. To Mexico and left the poor ignorant, "I ain't wantn' no dern' union.", southerners in the dust with the rest. And as far as southern states being broke, there are several that have had to shut their state governments down because they ran out of money. They have not given state employees a raise in 3 years. So don't spew your lies and sing the praises about the "right to work" states.
OH...... And by the way. Don't worry about me being safe. You just need to look over your own shoulder "little buddy".
Wow. So you are comparing teacher's work to retail, customer service or waitress jobs? How much do you think it cost to get a BSN or Masters degree? Last time I checked, the jobs you posted don't even require a high school diploma. It's like comparing doctors to pizza delivery guy. I bet you would be glad if teacher's salaries drop down to walmart style minimum wages eh? The teacher positions might be easy to fill now....... but what happens when the economy recovers? Good luck trying to fill positions that only pay minimum wage that requires a BSN or Masters.
No wonder our public education been going down the tubes for years. People want world class education on shoe string budget.
TheTruth......Aren't some of the Southern states right to work states? I haven't read anywhere where they are well flushed in the state pockets and isn't there very high unemployment (and forclosures) in some areas that top above 15%.Hmmm
Thought I heard that Texas is deep in the hole deficit wise, like billions...... I wonder why? Hmmmmm
Thought I read/heard somewhere that when the gov took over the state, Wisconsin was budget neutral, and that the deficit is due to his immediate giving tax breaks to wealthy folks and corporations -even some out of state corps- that is running the state into this deficit. Hmmm
This move seem to be patterned off the move done by NJ Gov Whittman Gov and the present one Christie. Hmmm
If the Wisconsin gov thought he was so in the right why did he have to put the National Guards on alert? Why the bully tatic?
It appears that this whole matter is about breaking the Unions by the repubs on behalf of the corps etc........ But why?
Does anyone really believe that doing away with unions in this country will set this country on a sound financial path, really stop the jobs outsourcing, lower the cost of living, make higher education more affordable, open more trades schools, make the workplace safer or stop the slide of the workers wage, or increase the minimum wage, increase job security in the private sector etc in this country?
The Truth...
Posting your entire psycho-babble response in bold makes you appear desperate for someone to listen to you. Face it...you libs are losing ground and it simply kills you. I love it! Watching libs squirm is so very refreshing!
hmmm...I see threats
BZe1......... Exactly right! The only reason that Texas is doing a bit better is because the companies build most of their factories along the southern edge of Texas. Then they let the Mexican workers come over the border on work permits. They even have their children schooled in Texas as part of an agreement with Mexico for cheap labor. "Right to work" is just another way to say "Do or Die".
I see an Egyptian Sun on the rise here in the states.
Forwhatever: Seems we're diametrically opposite ideologically (no, really?) What disturbs me about absolute certainty is that often it is wrong. Your original statement about republicans needing to be gone as a party is absurd and one sided.
Democrats aren't the sine qua non of 'party of the common man' anymore than republicans are the party of big business. Americans have been shafted for years by members of BOTH parties. The divisions are for show and to keep people bickering so that they don't realize how badly they've been and are being shafted.
There is a fiscal crisis happening in this country. Both sides have good ideas and both sides have crappy ideas. Pandering to a voter base is not going to solve these problems, nor are class divisions and name calling. Once upon a time such behaviours could be indulged in because the crisis hadn't gotten to this point. It is way past time for this to cease. It's reminiscent of a husband and wife bickering about whose turn it is to take out the trash while all around them the house is on fire.
Anyone addressing the topic at hand? Democrats boycotting a vote? Right or wrong, at least they are taking a stand. Where are the right wing cheerleaders that think protesting is a good thing? All I read is the complaint that students were brought in by teachers to the protest. Seems there aughtta be one republican applauding the lesson of protests being taught to students. Let me guess, it isn't republicans doing the boycotting.
You are willing to have a corporation deemed a legal citizen but not a union? Please explain the difference. CEOs of corporations are treated while union workers are cheated? CEOs get big bonuses and told, it's ok, it's in thier contract. Unions are squelched and told thier contracts don't matter?
So, if we own a company, we have our rights, if we work for a company, we are to be slaves to them.... got it.
OverTaxedAgain....... (Probably on welfare.) I guess that "Sally" as you put it is busy tracking down how many times you have called people names on here. Does "Jethro" ring a bell?
And I'm sorry if you mistook my comment for a threat to someone else. (That is someone else isn't it? I mean you wouldn't use different names on here just to pat your own back would you?) But don't worry. I don't threaten. No threats are not facts. I deal with facts.......... Get it?
TheTruth1950: "You Faux news parrots are the most stupid bunch of idiots allowed to have a computer."
Yawn. If there was actual substance to your points, you wouldn't have to resort to name-calling...
Government workers pay their taxes from my taxes.
It is they who have no sympathy for me.
I love how the media and the career politicans blaming our economic downfall on unions and federal workers.
Last time I checked, the unions and federal workers didn't force our country in to 2 deadend wars that is costing us 160 billion a year, gave huge tax breaks to the rich and corporations, gave outrageous salaries to CEOs, give out predatory subprime mortgage to americans, and outsourced American jobs overseas while still posting record profits. Don't also forget that unions and federal workers didn't raid the social security funds and pension funds to pay for pet projects and wars while replacing it with iou's.
Bosslimo: "So, if we own a company, we have our rights, if we work for a company, we are to be slaves to them.... got it."
If that's how you feel then, don't go to work for a company. No job is a right, just as owning a company is not a right.
Rick: this is about class warfare, don't you get it. Us vs. them.
As to the Supreme Court, I also find their classification of Eminent Domain equally disturbing and the Faux news comment??? come on, is that the best you can do? Seems you parrot other media driven talking points and guess what? The media is controlled by six corporations, that's all, just six, and if the FCC keeps it up that number will diminish as well. So, where do we get our propaganda?
had-enough-470242: "Last time I checked, the unions and federal workers didn't force our country in to 2 deadend wars that is costing us 160 billion a year, gave huge tax breaks to the rich and corporations, gave outrageous salaries to CEOs, give out predatory subprime mortgage to americans, and outsourced American jobs overseas while still posting record profits."
I think you're a little confused. Federal workers (i.e. your illustrious government) had everything to do with your first 2 points, they enabled your 3rd and 4th points, and unions had everything to do with the last point.
mygirl1........ I could point out that it was you who tossed an insult my way that got the whole argument started. But we'll just drop that one and get back to the problem.
I agree that we are in bad shape economically. But I'll just give you a short peek through my eyes for a second and maybe you will be able to see my point a bit better. I recently was invited to go on a cruise in the Bahamas, where I spent time on a private Island in a 5 million dollar beach house. We wined and dined at the cost of over $1,200 for one meal in Boca Raton . We laid in the Sun, went deep sea fishing for several days to the cost of over $20,000.
Now..... The fellow that took me is worth over $50,000,000 and is listed in Forbes. He has 3 private planes including a Lear jet and 2 sea going vessels. He's a great guy, but at his age of 35, with so much wealth accumulated I had to get curious. He grew up poor, so it wasn't family money. Upon research I found huge donations he had made to the Republican party and its programs. I also saw where after said donations were made, he got the "bid" rewarded to him on various government projects........ all of which were overseen by Republican control. Then I noticed something else. He had one business not in his name, but in the name of someone close to him. It had nothing to do with any of his other business' and he would have had as much use for it as a pig would for a silk hat.
It was a business located in Colombia, South America. Again I looked at the list of his "political donations". All top name Republicans. McCain included. So you will have to forgive me if I feel that we are being sold out and something is rotten in Denmark.
And my taxes are paying these leech private contracting companies such as KBR and Blackwater who are profiteering off 2 wars. Oil private companies such as Exxon who posted 45.2 billion dollar profit in 2009 but paid no income taxes while using our tax payers paid public lands, or how the private financial and auto companies bailed out using our tax payer money eh?
My mistake. I forgot that you lumped police, teachers, firefighters, military, policiticans, government officials, congress, judicial officials all into one group.
Forwhatitsworth: Fair enough. Dig deep and you'll see that democrats are just as culpable when it comes to favors. Obama has GE and whoever is behnd the high speed rails and big pharma was one of his largest campaign contributors. Reid has casinos and chinese investments with turbines and the list goes on from both sides.
I have to ask how a 35 year old is worth fifty million and where he got said money for the massive donations? George Carlin hit the nail square on the head when he said to forget about voting or changing things since a handful of large corporations had controlled America since, like forever. If you read a little history you'll see where I'm coming from as regards both parties and special interests. Until campaign finance reform occurs (like when hell freezes over) we will continue to suffer as a result.
had-enough-470242... Don't let anyone change your mind. You're so close to the truth and I know that at least SOME of the posters on here know it and want you to shut up.
Hey! You want to make a hit at your next party? I've got a Blackwater tee-shirt I'll let you have cheap. I don't think I'll be needing it after what I've seen.
mygirl1.... You know the guy that is being held in Pakistan right now? Well this guy does similar things for people in dark places. His business' run themselves off of cheap labor and a few key people.
It was my past that got me invited along. I had wine at a dinner party at one of his mansions with a guy who had had lunch with the director of the CIA. They were drinking wine at $800 a bottle. Does that tell you anything?
Our country is in a world of "trouble", there is a storm coming and at my age I only fear for my children and grandchildren not for myself. The American dream has been bought and sold by people who hide behind our flag and profess to be patriots, when in truth it is all about $$$$$$$$$ and lots of it.
And the next American Revolution begins. Thank God for the true Americans that stand tall for everything this great nation has always been about. Not those that have worked so hard for so many years to corrupt the proud American spirit in the name of great power and wealth. But those with the blood coursing thru their veins of our wise forefathers and the brave men and women that have paid with their very lives to preserve this great nation for well over 200 years.
We are proud Americans, not the lazy wimps that some in our country believe us to be. We will not lie down beaten as many of our own political leaders and wealthy corportions sell this nation to the highest bidder. This land is our land. This great American experiment called the United States of America belongs to us. You may think that your swindles have worked. You may think you have divided and conquered the people thru the lies of your highly paid media. You are badly mistaken.
The people of Wisconsin have proven you wrong. The political leaders in Wisconsin that stand with the people have proven you wrong. You WILL correct all that you have soiled or the rest of the people in the entire country will rise against you. The time is now to restore the balance in this country. You can't have it all or most of it. The resources and hard work of the people in this country belong to all of us. You'll willingly give it back or we will take it back.
Forwhatitsworth: I was wrong, we're on the same page. See what deliberately created class and political divisions can do. So, how do we alter course? I try to look at both sides and do research and have become a conspiracy theorist as a result. It didn't start out like that, I was just curious but the more I read and looked into situations and events the more alarmed I became. Have you ever read Vonnegut's "God Bless You Mr. Rosewater?" If you have then you understand the 'money river' and what we have before us is the money river x ten.
mygirl1..... No I haven't read it, but I will make it a point to get a copy. I'm old enough to remember President Eisenhower making his last speech as he left office. I can still remember what my father said, (A die-hard Republican.) when I sat and watched the outgoing President I remember this nervous look on his face and in his eyes as he glanced around the room. He was speaking of the changes in our country with a standing army the size of which our country never had, and the pressures that were already, just 15 years after WWII had ended, being put on the political structure of our country.
I think if there was a turning point, that was it. My father served under Eisenhower in WWII. He said not to me, but to himself out loud, "I've never seen him so nervous?" Almost as if it were a question he was asking himself.
What I have seen and experienced is what some would refer to as "honor among thieves". Somewhere people started caring more for themselves and money, then they do for the life of our country and our country men. We have become so divided that we are easy to control. In the 1960's-70's there was a force that brought people together in a common goal. But the movement was attacked and destroyed by the introduction of drugs to many of the people involved in it. At that time in my life, I would have been against it. But now I look back and think that it was no accident that the drug culture was the thing that brought that movement down.
Fire the Wisconsin teachers who did not report to work! There are plenty of qualified people who need these jobs. These filthy pigs should kiss the ground that they walk on because it's NOT Egypt, not Bahrain, not Libya, not Lebanon, not Syria, and not Iran. Fire them now!
Waterdog49......... Have another six-pack. The night is still young.
Forwhatitsworth: The 60's started out as anti-vietnam. My father was in the army and I remeber a lot of GI's coming back with some serious dope. I also recall that the draft was alive and well and how returning soldiers were treated.
Look into the Third Reich and how many nazis were funded by wealthy families on this side of the pond. The corruption goes back to the robber barons, the Rockefellers, Morgans, Standard Oil and many, many more of that ilk.
Derek: I'm a NJ homeowner, and I don't know what the hell you're talking about. Cut what public school budget? Christie or no Christie, when you live in a community controlled by Communists of the worst kind , there are no school budget cuts, and Gov. Christie can't do a freakin thing about that. I don't know what the hell you're talking about. You obviously don't live in a Communist town in NJ as I do. Fuggetabouit. I'm moving south where all the sensible people in NJ are going. Lost cause!
mygirl1.... I know all about Vietnam. From 1st hand experience. I also had a brother and 3 first cousins to go there. I cousin died from agent orange and agent yellow, one was crippled by a helicopter blade that was blown off by a mortar round and struck him. My brother suffers now from agent orange. My other cousin who was a USMC at Khasahn in 68' suffers from PTSD. Me? All I got during that time was a cut on my hand and a broken leg.
And I know about Prescott Bush and his ties to Hitlers war machine. The Bush family still has law suits pending against them for their part in operating a factory using Jewish slave labor to produce among other things, Zyclon B. It was a gas that was used to murder people in the extermination camps that the Nazi's ran.
I'd love to keep talking with you, but I have a farm to run, so I have to get up at 5:00am. I'll click on you to stay in touch. Take care.
"In response to a question of where she was, Sen. Lena Taylor sent a tweet saying she was "doing the people's business. Power to the PEOPLE.""
Run and hide and then claim you are doing your job and throw out an overplayed slogan to impress the easily impressed.... Just when you thought Dems couldn't sink any lower. What kind of adult runs away and hides? Must be nice to just disappear from your job and not be fired.
orbust........ Too many? Fat and lazy? Or are you just too fat and lazy to respond?
Kinda makes you feel "outnumbered" doesn't it?
pjam09......... What kind? The kind that became President of The United States once...... Abraham Lincoln.
Hmmm....I wonder if we could get some of those guys from Wisconsin to come down here and get the Democrat legislators to leave our state.
Fact: Wisconsin's was projected by their own accounting to have an overall budget surplus of one hundred and twenty million in 2012 (amazing considering the state of the economy Nation wide). Interesting that the Republican Governor pissed it all away in tax breaks for his corporate cronies (this was his first order of business after taking office). These tax breaks for the rich, multinationals and corporations totaled one hundred and thirty million (do the math). More importantly eliminating the American right of collective bargaining for Federal and state employees will effectively destroy and eliminate the Democratic Party's number one source of Champaign donations in any given year. This is not fiscal conservatism... this is politics! Fact: FOX News is lying on behalf of Corporate America!
big freakin deal, it is not as if party line has not walked out before during session. Grow up and deal with it. That is what you were elected to do.
As for the Democrat state senators, what were you thinking???? I personally would have loved to see how the Wisc Repulicans vote. Yes, it would have further solidify the elitists and the working class. The debate would have been comical, with new comedy lines every day.... serious late night and SNL material. It would have a been serious blow to the GOP in Wisconson in 2012.... Should have pushed the matter instead of delaying debate and vote on a dead bill. In my opinion, this bill is already dead. If Republicans actually vote for the Bill, then it is guaranteed that they will not have any blue collar support in their next election. No one is that stupid.... The one term Tea Party members is another case. So why represent your constituients?
This is very simple. You (A. Person). are not entitled to 100% benefits and pay funded by the taxpayers. The people that don't enjoy YOUR same right. Why should we in the private sector pay for something we can't have?
In the above thread I made the following comment;
It was collapsed, even though 120 people agreed with me. I see others who I disagree with treated in the same manner. Why is this?
After reading all these comments about "other" unions, I am wondering why NO political group in power has even talked about just how HUGE & POWERFUL the police, firemans, and paramedic unions are??
What will they be forced to give up?? I live here in NY state and I was SHOCKED to learn that there are at least 7 LAYERS of Law Enforcement (local police, sheriffs, state police, City, county and state Marshalls, DEC, NCON, NYS Bureau of investigation, and god only know how many depts I have missed ALL being paid to do the same job as each other ONLY doing it by filing a different form with a different dept. How does this state justify that a MAJOR (rank) in ANY of these depts (ALL covered BY the PBA) should earn an annual salary of $174,000 (YES, that's a Hundred and seventy four THOUSAND dollars) as a salary NOT including ALL the PERKS of the job.
And the GREED of these people is simply nauseating. The RANKS above the rank of Captain ALL were asking for a $20K annual salary increase less than 2 months ago. Thank god, our NEW govenor told them where to stick it.
It is absolutely no wonder when considering the salarys that these people are paid for the amount of daily and annual work that each of them do, that this state is BEYOND broke!!!!
There is absolutely NO reason why we have to have 7 LAYERS of Police, Fire, and Paramedic protection. What happened to the world where I grew up in where you either had local police of the sherriffs for local protection and the STATE police took care of the STATE. That was friggin it.
1. 2, or 3 different police agencys protected this state until as late as the 60's. Then all heck broke loose, and someone figured out that since the taxpayers were paying the bill and they also thought the taxpayers were too stupid to realize it, they could just organize NEW agencys to cover everything from chasing down squirrels (park police) to mean spirited Meter Maids.
And when those same people who slipped all this crap past the taxpayers soon realized there was just not enough state revenue the normal way (federal taxes) to pay these people a NEW state income tax was instituted as well as the commanders looked the other way while their patrol officers ran rough shod over the citizendry by issuing rediculious tickets, violations, summons, with absolutely INSANE amounts of fines attached.
Never mind, this crap about SURCHARGES that the state now redularly attaches to virtually EVERY form of business conducted.
The system is seriously BROKEN because of ALL the "in-your face/what are YOU going to do about it" rampant GREED and CORRUPTION that the PEOPLE (YOU) are ALLOWING these HIRED GUNS to do to you.
And trust me people, the Law Enforcement people of this state will be the LAST folks I call in case of an emergency. I do not need too. I have designed my entire life to be self-sufficent and OFF-the-GRID right down to on site power generation and HIGH pressure water pumps to fight fires.
Learn to be self-sufficent and there will be absolutely no need for all this EXCESS Law Enforcement protection, fire protection/prevention, and even the most basic medical skills.
Does anyone here think for a moment that pioneers on the frontier 100 years ago called the fire department when there was a fire?? Heck no, they dealt with it them selves and did not cry to Social Services for financial support.
People had a SPINE back then. They were HEARTY, strong, PROUD to be American and did NOT complain.
What the hell has happened to my country I was born in, proud to serve, and as JFK said "ASK not what your country can do for you BUT what can you do for your country"
To me this basic tenant has fallen by the wayside as people have figured out that they only have to do the bare minimum to earn a UNEARNED hourly wage as dictated by the rules of a UNION contract!!!
Nuff said...........
What a despicable act by the Democrat Senators. Getting on a bus and leaving the State. It is a stunt. I think it was to allow some time to import more protesters in from other States. Obama's "Organize America" is now on scene. The DNC is involved. They are trying to swell the number of sign carriers and rabble rowsers to make it look like they have more support than they do. A de facto teachers strike. If they called in sick they should need a Doctors note, just like the kids do to excuse their absence. And Drug Test the Teachers too.......
25,000 out of a population of 5.4 million in the State. It's a small fraction.
Democrats are all for democracy when the vote will go their way....when the know it won't, they run away.......how Patriotic
It's funny how you mentioned that. I wonder what % of walmart, McDonalds or other corporations that pay unlivable minimum wages are actually on public assistance such as food stamps, medicare, medicaid, etc? Corporations in the private industry that still rake in huge profits yet pay their employees peanuts. After all, the government will pick up the rest.
I know a few marines that were on food stamps because their pay was so low (E-1 to E-3). They also have free tricare for their healthcare. You think they don't deserve it too?
These Teacher Unions need to understand that they have to start paying into the system like everyone else, first it was they were angry because we wanted to stop paying for their Viagra and now "they" don't want to have to pay toward "their retirement and Health Care. They drug students to the protest and when ask the kids didn't even know why they were there.
Obama wants the unions it to help him with getting reelected, well so sorry Obama you can't BUY your way this time. You are on your way out we can no longer pay to support these Unions and all their request!!
Janie Ackerly.....I wonder if there is a Viagra-like pill that would help them perform better in the classroom ??? You saw the students on TV.....wandering in a daze, giggling, Yay, a day off from school....My teacher brought me here....to stop some guy from doing something
This sure is a heated topic. Almost 10,000 responces!
Having been in business since before 18, and not having EVER been able to collect a days worth of unemployment, nor anyone to cry to but myself regarding working conditions, pay and vacation the very idea of a Union makes me sick. I understand there are some people that require consistency, they would feel completely lost without a schedule or a "set" routine. All I can say is this, "It must be nice".
One time when I was very young I went to this party with friends. Turned out to be a real bad scene. Lot's of people doing drugs, many of them from the local factory (One of the big three). Anyway my car got stuck in a snow bank (Mustang 5.0) and I was somewhat forced to make friends with these people or freeze, besides there was no way I was going to push the car out myself. In making conversation with one of them who was wearing his Automotive UAW outfit I asked him "Just get off work?" and he said "Naw I'm on break". Considering the amount of drugs he had consumed I was a bit taken back and I asked him "You won't get in trouble going into work intoxicated"? He said to me "Naw, I have a union job, if someone reports me for being high the company has to pay to rehabilitate me, which is basically paid vacation time, after that I just get my job back."
At that time I owned my own business, was single, well dressed, 3 year old sports car and I thought to myself "How the hell do these manufatures survive!?". Now days I am married with children, only dress up when it matters, drive a 20 year old S Class and still own my own business.
I started my business with nothing and I still have most of it left.
That's my story for tonight.
Oh, so the DEMOCRATS don’t like what the PEOPLE voted for in November? They just walk out and don’t want to do business? WHO is the party of NO???? Maybe we should send them all to Egypt!
Hi DBAkron - good comments. I live in West Central Ohio and our local school system is a prime example of why these bills are necessary. The local city school spends 80% of the yearly budget on wage and benefits for employees. There have been multiple tax levies placed on our local property taxes. A recent levy went down, but then someone, "magically" found the votes needed to make it pass. Our county has had some of the highest Unemployment in the State of Ohio, many months over 13%. The city is deeply divided and since then has made a renewal levy fail. Since 2006 I have lost 16.5% of my wages due to the downturn, yet, until last year, the school employees continued to receive COL raises each year. A request was brought forth to reduce their wages by 2% to balance the budget. You think they were trying to kill the teachers! We cannot have any reduction in pay due to the contract. The Unions have all along, created a propaganda program to insist that "the kids will suffer" if all their demands are not met. Well, the school programs are already suffering since 80% of the money goes to Teacher salaries. (BTW, it has already been shown that the school system is heavy on support staff, without due cause.) The average Teacher in our Dist has a base pay in excess of $50000. I, as a Controller for a small local company, makes much less than the Teachers. (I also have a Master's as well.) The private sector has had to adjust to keep themselves in business, yet, the Unions is keeping their rank and file from joining us. That is wrong. It is greedy and irresponsible. I am so sick of the Unions destroying our country. They are not better than the private sector, nor are the Academically better either. They should not receive more than the private sector or more than the budget can afford.
Mike, The kids looked like they were having a high old time laughing and giggling, they just don't know why, guess it was because they weren't in class being "taught" I think what I find really irritating is the fact some of these unions feel we should take care of them the rest of their lives. These teachers are getting more and more benefits and doing less,our schools are declining and kids are learning less and less.
Every time I hear another republican complaining about union workers being overpaid my jaw hits the floor. Over the last 30 years, the salaries of the wealthy CEOs and high-level management has skyrocketed while the salaries of just about everyone else has DECREASED in inflation-adjusted dollars.
You want to know who is overpaid? The wealthy. Explain to me how a police officer that puts his life on the line every day to protect the rest of us is overpaid but the CEOs of health insurance companies somehow deserve to be paid tens of millions of dollars a year for canceling the insurance policies of cancer patients. Explain to me how a teacher that spends 7 hours a day dealing with a ROOMFUL of kids and spends her evenings preparing lesson plans for the next day is overpaid but the multi-millionaires on Wall Street somehow deserve their salaries when they do little for society except fatten their own wallets?
Finally, explain to me how a company somehow deserves to have the same rights as a person but a union does not.
Wake up, folks. This has nothing to do with solving any financial crises in Wisconsin. This is simply a group of republicans trying to union-bust because unions tend to support democrats. It's plain old selfish politics.
Had enough,
Interesting points, but.....
Being in a 100% taxpayer funded benefit plan does not preclude you fromfood stamps, if you qualify.
And if one does't feel that they are earning enough, or being treated fair....Find another job. If you are on food stamps, you probably qualify for taxpayer funded education opportunities which can lead to bettering your lifestyle, higher pay etc.
I'm not totally on board with comparing the state workers of Wis. 100% tax payer funded pensions (401K) for life, and 100% paid health insurance to those employees and their benefits of Wal-Mart. And I will assume that the average worker at Wal-mart is in the 48% of Americans that don't pay any federal taxes. Therefore, are not funding the retirements of state workers in Wis, and their health-care.
MginRochester,
To me this is not about comparing CEO pay with Union pay as you suggest. It is about me, an non-CEO in the upper 52% of people that pay all the taxes, funding a retirement (100%) and health-care (100%) of state officials.
Those workers do not pay into their pensions, the tax payers fund it. The state of Wis. is hurting financially. I am on the side of "I don't want my taxes raised continually in order to balance budgets." And I don't want to pay for other people retirement plans. In the 70's US corporations had pension program for non-union people. The were replaced by 401K matching programs. To me it is time to match what the average private employee has with what the states are offering.
The costs that the unions have are not in pay, but benefits. Increase their pay, and mirror good, quality public company benefits.
MGIN, I don't think this is so much "all" unions but more about the refusal to negotiate. This one won't even agree to Contribute toward their retirement or pension. My husband was in the Carpenters Union we had to pay toward his Pension and Health Care, and if we wanted to continue the Health Care after he retired we still pay toward that. I don't thing the American Tax Payer should pay for everything , the members of unions should have to contribute like everyone else. I also think the Government workers should pay in as well. We are going bankrupt fast!!
ok i have read this, and see nothing at all unreasonable..... outside of teachers, and unions using kids to "stop some dude from doing something" kids have no reason to be there if 1 they have no idea wtf is going on because these so said teachers, cant even teach them the name of the governor, a free get out of class pass to do something they have no clue as to what they are doing? these people want US to pay for there raises, not to mention show support? get a life you union scumbags, shame on you for bringing airheads to a debate that have NO CLUE as to what the debate is about, much less lacking the smarts to comprehend what the word debate means. shame on the democraps for running like little kids to pout rather than debate this in the open.....
oh, and if you union anti political republicans want to cry about where's the cut to elected officials? read it again, they are in there with the rest of the group. so cry foul all you want to, the democraps in this case ar trying to save the $$ going into their own pockets!
Who ever is managing this site, I have one question. This is supposed to be a site where people can come and state their idea's. It does not mean that if ones ideas does not meat the approval of the masses that this persons statement should be collapsed. And for you group members who are doing this, shame on you, you wish to be heard, so why is it that you can not let others be too. I do understand shutting down racist, stupid, or outright hateful statements, but to shut down people's views just because they do not agree with yours or the groups is wrong.
This agreement looks pretty darn good to me
And to add to my statement. Why is it that the people that have the most people agreeing with them are the ones that are shut down. Although I see both sides have been shut down, mostly I see anti-union sides shut down. This is becoming nothing more then censorship and needs to be stopped.
guess once the public sector falls, private sector will to. i'm going to design a card board box that will accomidate a family of four. anybody want to buy one while you have some cash. you can get it real cheap right now before inflation shows up, or demand increases.
pardon my ignorance, i have almost no personal experience with unions, we don't have a lot of unions in Tennessee, but it seems whenever they strike in our area, they were already making much more than the average, so there arguments seem petty compared to what others are facing. as for the democrats walking out, my first thought was YEA! But i admit it does not reflect well on them. However, too often it seems the biggest problem with our two party system is the teeter-totter, back and forth, where 51% thinks they have the absolute power to overrun the will of the other 49%. Not that i believe any other system is better, i just think we tend to confuse voting with hero worship, and immediately after being elected our "public servants" become drunk with power and forget "their place". i just read an article by an adomant republican activist in our state calling for the impeachment of our newly elected republican governor because immediately after election his first act was to change disclosure laws that would force him to disclose sources of income, etc. blah, blah, blah. My point is we should all put aside our insane devotion to partisan politics and work together to dig ourselves out of the mess created by the crooks on both sides of the aisle, which WE elected by the way, so we must all share the blame and responsibility. Finally, i don't believe there is that much difference between unions and government, both are little more than necessary evils, drunk with money and power, prone to corruption, and yet ELECTED BY US! Jimmy Carter (i know, you hate him) once said in a debate with Ronald (i forgot) Reagan (i know, you worship him), that there are no simple solutions to complicated problems (paraphrased), and never has that been more true than now. I like John Lennon's attitude, "i tell them there's no problems, only solutions". May we find peace and unity, and if we must fight, let us fight against the corruption that is enslaving us and destroying this great country. "Give me your money, send me to Washington, and I will solve all your problems" quote (insert crook of choice here).
So we have two choices it seems.
No unions and the corporate oligarchy that it promises, or we embrace unions and the excessive, mafia like operation that it represents.
And we, with a straight face, want to export this wonderful lifestyle to other countries? Are we serious?
Personally I wish for some calamity to strike that is so horrible that it changes the way we look at life. Unfortunately thats what it will take. The world is consumed by greed. We think we have it bad here when in other countries they just walk into your house, shoot you, and take all of your possessions in the name of the state.
Bring on the aliens! I would rather my children get vaporized by heat beams then have them be slaves to the elite cabal of powerbrokers.
Your child just might be the person who carries Paris Hilton's dogs poop bag!
by the way, i own my own business, and work a second job (thanks to the housing market collapse), pay my taxes, and have never taken unemployment, food stamps or any other form of government assistance, and though i may lean democratic, i wouldn't pee on either party if they were on fire in their current form. now, let the hate begin.
To those who are wondering why law enforcement and firefighters were left out of the bill, it is because SOME of these local departments backed
Gov. Walker in the election. Over the past years Wisconsin public employees have taken pay freezes and contributed more the insurance and pension, but this is not what they are protesting for, they are protesting for their collective bargaining rights which is what the bill aims to take away. Check out the definition of collective bargaining to see that it involves way more than wages and benefits. Walker says ending collective bargaining is part of the budget fix but collective bargaining has nothing whatsoever to do with balancing the budget especially since Wisconsin actually has a surplus in it's budget. This is union busting plain and simple plus a little favoritism thrown in for good measure to the groups that supported the governor (however, these departments can now be seen protesting in Madison for the sake of their fellow workers). If this bill pases and if you believe in trickle down, then this will trickle down to all unions and then to everyone in the private sector. The benefits that the private sector enjoys, 40 hour weeks, 401K's, vacation, safe working conditions, etc., were courtesy of the union's fights and once these rights are taken away from union members there's no stopping it being taken away from the private sector. So for those of you who think unions are no longer necessary, think again. And no, I do not belong to a union, I just live in Wisconsin and have the common sense to see this for what it is. As for the democrat senators that left the state, thank you for standing up for the people that voted you in. You are the voice of your electors, even though you are not in the big building in Madison, you are still doing the job you were electred for are being paid for.
Hey - who's collapsing so many of the commnents? My comment (1.20) was collapsed "by the community" and I simply expressed an opinion. Who did that?
I want to know how to collpase comments also - There's a lot of Repug BS that needs to be eliminated.
Dont worry about those fine government jobs.
Walmart is ready to take up the slack.
Your kid can buy school supplies, get an education, eat lunch, and see the nurse all in one convenient location.
Sorotof like Carl's Jr. in the movie Idiocracy.
I really wish people would bother to do the Research as to the History of the US Labor Unions.
1. The US Labor Unions of the Henry Ford Era were wiped out by the 1929-1939 Great Depression.
2. Prior to World War II, President FDR Suspended All US Labor Union Activities. During that time it was thought that the US Labor Unions were part of the "Italian Organized Crime". In retrospect he was right. As the US Labor Unions were Organized by the "Italian Organized Crime" gone legit (many of the Italian Godfathers did not want to get into other "Businesses" like Drugs and Prostitution (easier to get caught).). The "Italian Organized Crime" also started the US Insurance Corporations, like Arsonist "Tommy the Torch" selling "Business Insurance". Most of the "Italian Organized Crime" believed in what Mussolini and ally Hitler were doing, since Germany and Italy got out of the Global Great Depression (people literally dying from starvation) years before the US.
3. Prior to WWII President FDR also Nationalized all US Industry. While the US was shipping US Military "War Materials" to England before getting into the War At Europe (an Act of War). England was at War with Germany since 1939, and had set backs (loss of lots of Military Equipment) like loss at Dunkirk.
4. After the US entered the War At Europe, the US War Department conducted a Study to prevent the catastrophic accidents at the US Ammunition Plants/Factories. The Study strongly recommended a decrease in the work week to 40 hours per week, a certain amount of sleep, safety procedures, numbers of fire extinguishers, a fire department, etc.. Since US Industry was Nationalized by President FDR, this became Standard for all US Industry. It was NOT the later (after WWII) nor previous US Labor Unions that did this as they claim (propaganda). Later other concessions were made like getting the day off for Religious Worship (Sunday). The Jews demanded Friday and Saturday off for Religious Worship and received Saturday. Eventually this resulted in Saturday and Sunday off from work. Eventually, even concessions were made to make all wages equal at all the US Nationalized Industry (including for Women) this became the later Federal Minimum Wage (again not because of the US Labor Unions, as their Activities were Suspended by President FDR). You can get a copy of the US War Department Study (above) under the FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act), like I did (if I were at home not here (Afghanistan), where my copy is, I could give you the entire title, date, etc.).
5. During the US Military Invasion (Liberation, depending on your viewpoint) of Sicily, and Italy, the "Italian Organized Crime" (still believed in what Mussolini was doing) demanded and organized the US Labor Unions to strike to slow down the US Military Invasion of Sicily and Italy. President FDR states a National Emergency and orders the US Military Police (not National Guard) to stop the Strikes, with Deadly Force Authorized, resulting in the US Military Police machinegunning US Labor Union Strikers that got violent (deadly). Reference BBC Documentary. While living (stationed) at Germany and Italy while writing my Research Papers for Post Graduate Degrees I interviewed many survivors of WWII (that were young adults ("teens were considered as adults back then, as in their Military) during WWII, to get an idea of what happened at Germany and Italy). The Study of Military History/Science/Politics is job related as a US Military Officer.). Much to the displeasure of the College Professors my Research Papers were written like a Cornelius Ryan (I like his books and style of writing) Novel (including the detailed research, hundreds of pages just in the appendices.).
6. After WWII the President FDR Suspension of US Labor Union Activities was lifted. During this time the "Italian Organized Crime" took over the US Labor Unions in Full Force (financial backing, "muscle", organization based on the Italian equivalent of the National Socialist German Workers Party and "brown shirt" tactics, etc.). This has been chronicled by movies and books like F.I.S.T (1978), On the Water Front (1954), Last Exit to Brooklyn (1989), TV mini series American Justice: Target - Mafia (1993)(Jimmy Hoffa), Jimmy Hoffa (aka Hoffa)(1992), etc.. The US Labor Unions became a lucrative legitimate business for the "Italian Organized Crime", just like they started Las Vegas (eventually caught by the US Government for Tax Evasion, so the US Government ended up owning Las Vegas, including the "Houses of Ill Repute". Eventually everything was "contracted" out or sold to private corporations. Hint: "What happens in Vegas" does not stay in Vegas.). The US Labor Unions take the previous names (pre Great Depression, pre WWII) of US Labor Unions for Public sentiment, popularity and familiarity (smart move).
Back in the day. When I was assigned to US Military Training With Industry (TWI) at Detroit with a certain US Automaker. The car I was drove ended up with four flat tires (sliced), a broken windshield, and torched. I had driven the wrong brand of car into the parking lot (Ford parked at GM). What was really not so smart was that: 1. the car was a Rental, 2. Being a US Military Officer am a US Government (Federal) Employee. The Rental Agency started to put pressure on the UAW to turn over those responsible since they Lease vehicles from Ford, GM, Chrysler. Being a Federal Employee it is the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) that investigates the crimes committed. Eventually, those that did the crimes (fear as terrorism) were turned over by the UAW, and they testified that they were just following UAW Orders.
By the way I already stated in other Newsvine Forums (Topics) the Solution to Fix/Repair the Broken US Education System based on my firsthand experience with the Public, Private and International Education Systems. I will not restate it here, this post is too long, and I have to lead my men and women of my US Military Asymmetric Mountain Warfare Command Team plus one Support Team to the next location (commanders (US Military Officers) lead from the front, basic leadership 101).
One last thing, research who "Mr. Corporate America" is. (Hint he is NOT a Repugnant, think former Senator from Delaware, Delaware Incorporation Laws, especially "Wall Street" as his major unlimited corporate campaign contributors and constituents.).
These union workers are behaving very badly and are obviously ungrateful for the generous pay and benefits they get now!
The small amount the bill would have them contribute to their own benefits is nothing compared with what private sector employees have to contend with.
ray4a...what's the deal. Are you 15 or what with the caps and hysterical rantings about our president. He's YOUR president bird brain, not mine.
Now If it is Ok for POTUS to Freeze Pay on hard working Civil servants who are not millionares by any stretch of the imagination most of the GS pool are made up of GS-7 thru 12. Which anyone can look up thier pay (it's not allot) as I looked at it as an alterative for serving my country upon the end of the war or incase I was ever wounded and could no longer serve in uniform. They are a hiring freeze and are locked in at what they are currently making now. Potus and SECDEF came to this idea to freeze pay and promotions as a way to help the economy. Which the Civil servants who are Union to an extent never protested, walked out or quit because of the situation. They stood fast and are working with what they are given. My buddy as GS-11 makes 55K with locality pay his wife doesnt work as she is raising thier youngest and they are living paycheck to paycheck and now that it is tax season he is getting hammered because he pays less for healthcare.... 20% tax braket. He and many other within the federal government are willing to take on the chin.
When you think of rich Government servants think of those in washington Congress and the senate. I am sure they are doing just fine on thier pay and other entitlments.
So when it comes to a state I dont see the problem... They need to suck it up and look at the greater good. Their is to much selfishness and not enough working together. I though the dems were all about Working together and not being selfish. I thought that this was the party of sacrificeing for the person under them. They need to think of the greater good and get with the program. Maybe the Unions should not put so much money behing political canidates and keep a savings foralternate compensation for their members.
If the Federal Government can do it the unions can to. Ya Im sure they whine to each other at work but they don't walk out and leave business (inthis case kids) hung out to dry. No wonder our kids education sucks compared to other nations. No wonder a majority of scientist, engineers and mathmaticians are from other countries. Teaching is not rocket scinence as they only teach to the state standards just enough to get thier students by. SAD! When my son starts school next year our oldest will be at a private school one where a teacher is more than a daycare provider.
Tank:
By whom were those numbers projected by. I live in Wisconsin the "surplus" you're talking about doesn't exist. Not to mention, the Republican governor you're talking about has only been governor for all of 1 month. The Wisconsin State Senate hasn't even approved a budget yet and you're claiming Governor Walker's pissed all of our money away. I don't know what state you actually live in or where you get your sources, but having seen the goings on here first hand, I can tell you that you are way off on your facts.
collective bargaining rights also fall under these allotments, i call them allotments because you need to be special to get these....
if you neglect in your functioning role as an employee, you get time off 99.9% of the time with pay. you have the right to have your case heard before the union, as well the entity that has you employed, and thus IF the union doesnt feel there is good enough reason for you to be let go, ie. lack of effort at work, in subordination, misconduct, and so on, then your job is reinstated, with pay if by some remote chance you were denied pay. so for example: some teacher is caught having some type of relations with a student, we usually hear in most cases "suspended with pay till further review". that review is not based on guilt or innocence for some time, then you are still getting paid, even tho you are guilty as sin. hence be the case you have been found NOT to have been in such a violation, you are reinstated. This bill takes away the pay while suspended period. it takes away the power of elected officials of any sort to vote themselves in a raise, thus such a raise will be done with a vote for them in that district, ensuring they are doing their jobs. this also falls in the line with teachers, and other government workers.
The reason being police, firefighters, and emergency responders , are NOT included is, for the simple reason for an example: even if a police shooting an armed robber, who is even at the time shooting at him, and has full right to shoot this person in self defence, for hi safety, and others in the immediate area, he is put on administrative leave, mandatory. during that time the shooting is 1 being confirmed that the officer was in the right, 2 he also see's a therapist due to the emotional stress involved, be there is any and until an evaluation has been completed with satisfaction for he/she to return to work, armed, as an officer, and in his/her full mental capacity, so that there will be the issued sence that an armed person of the law, doesnt snap, and go on a killing spree, and is able to still defend himself, as well innocent victims, without the loss of more life if possible. so for those reasons, and this is as well in some relevance to firefighters and emergency responders of any type there maybe question to the ability to perform in the line of duty pending a traumatic event, or other. i personally am sick of hearing about teachers, and other government workers getting paid because they are suspended for a major infraction. when we hear about it we know this person is going to be fired, but by all means lets drag it out, and pay the person to boot. do you think this person pays the $ back? nope. they are entitled to that $ because the bargainingrights said they are. there's more, but for those who dont know, i suggest looking into what it does entail, and ask yourself, should the people be getting paid for derelictionof duty, as well other things the private sector wouldnt have a shot in heck at? yes do look into it, and you will see how absurd some of the collective bargaining rights are.
ForWhatItsWorth-2708556, TheTruth1950, you are both suspended for a day for violating rule # 1 of the Code of Honor.
I have never worked for a union job and never would. Unlike some, I have skill and don't need representation. As for overtime, doubletime, holiday pay, every job I have worked in the last 40 years payed it all.
I know a lot of businesses in Oregon that pay more in wages and benefits than union jobs because it is worth it to keep unions out.
Repubs whine when they do not get their way. What a hypocritical bunch of sore losers. The Dems that left the building were doing their job supporting their constituents' wishes. They WERE doing the job they were paid to do! The immature governor was mad because he learned REAL QUICK that he can't bully people around like somebody told him he would be able to do if he got to be king, er I mean governor. I guess when the Repugs were all saying 'NO' in lock-step last year that was mature behavior? Uh-huh.... riiiiiight.....
Hey Gov. Walker! You got an angry mob outside your door. Whatcha gonna tell them? Or are you even gonna talk to them? And if you do talk are you gonna do it yourself or 'have it done'. He's got a LOT to learn about people. Better start looking for another job. They act like they are gonna make you resign.... or squeal like a pig. Or both.
So the responsibility of the State Senators is not to participate in the governing process, but rather to cut and run out and hold their breath when politics work against there agenda
Their pay should be stopped, their insurance should be cancelled and they should receive no credit for service towards a pension for as long as this charade continues.
They were paid to govern not run and hide like little girls on a schoolyard
This walkout thing seems to be democrats way of "if you don't play our way, we'll take the ball and leave." They did the same thing in Texas in 2003. Cry babies, spoiled little children. If the republicans ever did something like that the babies would still be whining about it.
The loophole was left in the law and they used it. I think it was very clever. They used what they had at their disposal to get the job done. All the while the Rs cry (cry=operative word) foul, but no law has been broken.
I also find it very ironic that the WI repubs are asking for President Obama's help to force Democrats to return to the state legislature.
All they really want is for Governor Walker to sit with them to work out a compromise for this issue.
I also find it hypocritical to think that Republicans would not pull this same stunt given the same set of circumstances. Especially given that we watched them say NO repeatedly last year, vote after vote after vote..... At least the Dems plan is based in common sense and within the law.
My appologies for construeing the context. By using the word "right" I have misled my intent. Please replace the word "right" with the word contract. A legal document agreed to by both parties involved. That will put into perspective my intended message.
forwhatitsworth
Sally is doing what?
Bob @ 1.199.....LOL, I had to respond to your message.
You show the value of the unions to the private sector, even as you think you are trashing them (unions). LOL
Imagine that .... LOL the private sector employees are benefitting off the back of union workers/public sector employees union dues /representation.
These private employers are so concerned about having their employees unionize and have collective bargining etc, to where they would sooner or rather pay their private employees more to prevent this from happening. LOL
And you all are so ungrateful for this, and do not want to recognize what the unions have done to make your lives and workplace better, that you trash the unions at every hand, probably thinking that it is through your own efforts that you get the pay and benefits that you do get now.
Some of you guys need to get over your sense of self importance and belief that you are that important to a company that they cannot find another person to do your job and maybe at a cheaper rate and realize that without the unions you would not be able to bargain with these private employers for anything they did not want to give to you as salary or benefits package.
The private sector could treat you anyway they chose and there would be no one for you to appeal to, because there would be no govt agency formed where you as a private employee could file a greviance or complaint.
So it would seem that even without your direct input or representation by the unions you are receiving benefits from /off their (unions and union members) backs.
By the way I have worked in the private sector with no union represention, then the public sector with union represention , then the private sector where there was no union representation again.
So I am aware of how employees even licensed professionals are treated in both settings.
To other folks blaming the teachers for their childrens poor performance....
It is time that parents take responsibility for their children and their childrens' behaviour instead of expecting teachers to work miracles, to somehow make your children, who are so lacking in discipline and manners, learn and succeed. It is time to lead by example, place behaviour limits on your children, check homework etc.
When a child attend private school the parents expect their child/ren to learn because they are paying out mega bucks, so they put in the effort in their child/rens life and not allow these children to do whatever they chose with so much money on the line.
I, like my siblings attended private school because that was what was available at that time, and knew what my/our parents expected from me/us. Believe me .... discipline started at home. LOL
Hey Libs...We WON....Now shut up and go sit in the back.
Sound familiar? It should...they're obamas words!
!!!!!GO GOVERNOR!!!!!
will you show link where Obama said verbatum "now shut up and go sit in the back"?
He just said "I won". I guess the rest was "poetic license".
"Go sit in the back?" Racist much?
He said he would let republicans ride if they sat in the back. This was all over the news, nothing new.
Comparing the economy to a bus ride he said the following “We can’t have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don’t mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.” Oct 25, Woonsocket RI, My Hometown
Morf101: Thank you. Leftists here re-writing the facts again as they do in the lamestream media every day.
Pretty simple for you Repubs defending "It's cloudy"..
just show the link that Obama said verbatum..."now shut up and go sit in the back"!<
btw - I did notice "It's cloudy" hasn't defended his words yet"!/P>
Cloudy, it was Michael Steele who made that comment as a parting shot at his
last public speaking event as RNC Chairman.
It's cloudy:
Congratulatiolns on your "win". Remember when they start to demand 70 hour work weeks, no paid holidays, and generally the "saping" of the workers benefits. Not only, state and city employees but especially when the Corporations start taking and lowering YOUR benefits and wages. REMEMBER that you thought it was a GREAT "win" today; it was for you because no one cut your waqes and benefits TODAY! Perhaps you are right in looking at it as a win. But, I will assure you, the time will come when ALL of the workers of the USA will feel the heel of oppression form big corporations and the politicians. They will NOT stop with just the unions Next will come lowering all wages, even the minimum wage. You think it just the union member but when did anyone stop when they could get more savings and profit by taking from someone else. But for today, again, congratulations. I hope you will like what lies down the road for YOU! By the way, I'm no lib, but I am also no benign idiot either. I am retired and maybe should just keep my big mouth shut, I don't have a "dog" in this fight anymore!
The exact quote was: "we don't mind Republicans joining us; they can come along for the ride; but they have to sit in the back of the bus".
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?letter_id=5976465226
You may think you "won", but you'll realize your loss when your education system fails and your poorly educated children are in charge of your state in 20 years. Good luck with that.
I'm constantly amazed by people who want to screw over education. Don't you realize these children are the ones who will be taking care of you in your old age?
Do most people here sense the liberal angst?
Freaking awesome post. Someone who gets it. Why do private sector employees, after years of getting screwed by their companies, seem intent on tearing public sector employees down rather than asking their private sector firms for better benefits during the MOST PROFITABLE CORPORATE YEAR ON RECORD!
so you cheer the race to the bottom and think that American's should work for slave wages like they do in Malaysia just so that the CEO's of our former-corporations (let's be honest, these aren't "American companies" anymore) can make millions or even billions...
Your offspring will be so proud...
FUnny how Waterdog cited dems "rewriting the facts" when it was a blatant conservative that started this post. Typical repub sitting on a comeback, only to use it at the most innappropriate moment.
And the violins play...
LettyMcD,
"when" the education system fails, It has already failed. Time to pull the plug on public education. It isn't education. Just compare our "graduates" with those from many other nations. No wonder we are falling behind.
As liberals have pointed out countless times on newsvine, our education system IS failing and we're way behind other countries. All of this happened under Unions. They obviously were just out for bigger salararies and not better education. If not, they performed poorly at their job and need to be replaced.
It's all over the media outlets on how many states are going broke. If people still don't know this, our education system has failed us in the biggest way by teaching students to ignore data like this if it doesn't come from a specific party.
Hawklady: You are not quoting the President, but a letter from an irate constituent - check the source you included. The President was referring to being in a family car - families ride shotgun, lobbyists sit in the back.
Breaking the unions is first on the neo-conservative agenda (it's not really Goldwater or Reagan conservatism - its some twisted version that advocates a system to pool all the wealth of America into a few families). Their goal is a plutocracy in America, not a democracy. In power, they will set up a new feudalism where only the very rich have any power- all others will simply serve them. And if you refuse, you'll live in abject poverty. Do you really think these people care about you? Get a clue. If you aren't part of their royal circle - you're a nobody. The no-nothing Tea-partiers are their pawns. If this was 1776, these plutocrats would be the ones running to the King of England to turn in the revolutionaries.
You actually think that politics is a football game?! What a strange little man you are. Let me tell you what will happen next. The next election cycle, Wisconsin will be a Democratic state and then this vote will be overturned. Walker is a fool. All that he has done is make people angry. What he should have done is gone to the Unions and begged for consessions.
and you need to take off your reality blinders and realize that the cost of living here WILL NOT BE REDUCED when/if our wages become commensurate with those of slave laborers in Malaysia. When Ford moved production to Mexico saving millions (possibly billions) in labor costs, did the price of a focus go down? No, they continued to go up.
When companies go overseas, they don't lower the costs of their goods here. They milk it and charge up full price (or even more) than before for added profits. The price goes up, wages go down, and CEO profits/bonuses soar soar soar!
If I thought the price of food and gas would come down as our wages and benefits erode, you'd have a point. But no one seriously thinks this would be the case.
I live in Milwaukee, nice way to go Walker and thank you republicans. I hope we all will enjoy what's coming up, Next is to get rid of Minimum wages, get rid of the labor laws then companies can pay you as low as they want maybe $2 per hour like in China I mean $2 per day and no companies will send jobs over sea. I don't care because I have enough money and it actually gonna save me money. It is a win for WI and America HEHEHEHE.
Oh and here's the real take-away. If Walker really wanted to solve his states problems and was a good leader, he would have talked to the Unions instead of trying to bust them. Look at what Ford did recently and low-and-behold, they are doing really well. This was not about solving the state's budget problem, this was an ideological fight. Funny part is Walker thinks he is actually going to keep his office now. He's just made sure he and other Republicans will not get reelected in Wisconsin.
@Futyler:
In what world does the cost of living ever go DOWN? It simply is not possible. It will not happen- but your theory would be correct if it could happen. Food costs will not go down, housing prices will not go down, fuel costs will not go down, but wages are going down, as are job prospects, social security wages (possibly)- and an unprecedented amount of outsourcing, and in country outsourcing to robotics.
Unions fight for fair wages for everyone- something that I do contest. It should be easier for union employees to be fired. I agree. However, where would the subjectivity end? Scrambolo's assessment is quite accurate. This is indeed how the economics are constructed.
For those of you who equate Liberal with Democrat, you could not be FURTHER from the TRUTH.
Liberal=Republican
Liberal=little to no government interference in the public square, less taxes,less lawmaking that affects changes in the "quality of life" spectrum, such as the right to bear arms
Republican=all of the above
Democrat= diametrically opposed to the above
America could be gone forever. It saddens me to say this but we are broke, overrun by corporations, and our government, regardless of party affiliation, is co-opted by those corporations. For the first time in our nation's history we have little to no hope of a better future. When will the real Americans, such as You and I, the John Q. Publics, rally to restore? We should realize what has been taken from our reach; that what was once attainable is now a pipedream. This affects us all- the "new reality." It's time to reconceptualize and fight, or lie down and submit.
Lolly,
Senator Cunningham (R Missouri) is busy rewriting history. Because as we speak, she is working to roll back the Child Labor Laws to 1918.
Other GOP priorities include taking away health care, family planning and cancer screening from millions of women, union busting in Wisconsin and cutting cop's jobs.
While folks are dying in the middle east trying to get some signs of fairness and democracy in the 21st century, this Republican leadership is spending our own money to send us back to the 18th century.
I'm private sector. I make a tad over $60K a year at age 61 when I used to make somewhat more. I pay $237.39 every two weeks into my 401(k). I pay $100 into a health savings account because I have high deductible health insurance for which I pay another $95, and dental insurance of $23.50. I also pay another $45 for accidental death and life insurance for me and my wife. I'll have to work until I'm 66 for full SS benefits.
If I were public sector union, I'd have been retired for some time now, bringing in a living income. I'd have free health care for life.
Don't tell me that public and private sectors are equal. They aren't. I guaran-dam-tee you that most police and fire here in Ca. join because of the perks and benefits, and so do teachers. If the perks and bennies weren't so lucrative, they wouldn't do it. Would you?
Oh I see so when most of the country is making much lower wages all the prices are going to drop accordingly. Oh that's really cool.
You really believe that the US can drop to third world incomes and still maintain a 1st world standard of living? Really?
The ONLY thing that separates the 1st world from the third world is education, and standard of living (which includes social safety nets). That's it. Its not the military. Lots of third world nations have powerful armies. Its not the over all amount of wealth lots of third world countries have massive wealth (it just happens to be in the hands of a tiny percentage at the top sound familiar?). Its all in education and standard of living.
For years conservatives trumpeted that Communism would fail because ultimately it equalizes by making everyone poor. But Capitalism increases the quality of life and standard of living. Now Conservatives are being made to accept that high quality of life, is just not doable.
We all have to accept that we have to live poverty standards so our companies can be profitable. Nevermind that salaries and standards of living for those at the top of companies is still going to increase. Because the important thing isn't in production quality, or in safety, or worker's benefits. The important thing that we're all working for is that the C Club and the share holders can garner an ever growing percentage of money. And don't say that since they're absorbing all the profits of the company, and are hording far more resources than is reasonable for an individual, and that they can only have that level of profit because of the efforts of their employees. All of that is OK because they have "earned" it. They have current possession of the resources, so taking any of that back for the common good is theft. It doesn't matter if it was gained through unethical behavior, treachery, and dishonesty. They have it now so obviously they earned it. Now be good and go work harder to give them more. That's freedom! That's Liberty! That's what the Founding Father's risked revolution against the most powerful empire on earth to give us. Their great dream was that all men would one day serve under an entitled aristocracy. Its all the Declaration just read it!
scrambolo -- lower wages for some are inevitable. How do you think we can compete, even with higher productivity, when the rest of the world makes a fraction of what we do. I think we need to dump some of our bloat before we proceed too far.
Seriously! The first thing this corporate shill (Governor) did in office was give large corporations massive tax breaks. Why does this all sound familiar! According to several independent sources what had been essentially budget "neutrality" become a short fall!!! Guess who is making up the difference - working Americans. But that isn't the only reason why you will see this trend going Nation wide - the Republican's are going after the collective bargaining of "all" state and federal workers because they have traditionally supported the Democratic Party. This is POLITICS
dressed up as fiscal austerity (Carl Rove said as much - the only honest thing he has ever said)! Corporations will in the end be the only entities that benefit from Citizens United and armies of lobbyists. Wake up people - in the end they will privatize everything including the police and the fire department. Your house will burn if you missed a payment and Black Water will be the local constabulary. You think I'm joking - when it is all done and said America will have the look and feel of a some science fiction movie where morally bankrupt and yes overtly evil corporations are the government and run everything! Oh, and they will throw the best of the 19th century into the mix for good measure - debtors prison, work houses, cities suffocating in pollution (see London Fog). Our economy was tanked by Republican deregulation and Corporate greed and now there using the outcome as a pretext for going after American workers and every aspect of a once great and progressive society!
You nailed it Mike. The pig trough of the public sector is about to be downsized. Way past due.
----------------------------------------[snip]----------------------------------------------
What's that clapping sound I'm hearing?!
I know!
That's the sound of...
OH_SNAP!
Man, that's like tripple P\/\/n4ge right there!!!!1!!111eleventy
While I am not a fan of Unions, I don't believe this strong arm tactic is good. I wonder how long it will be before Unions will be necessary again? 20-30 years? Someone above referenced that if the cost of labor went down, the cost of goods would go down as well. This is pure BS. If the cost of labor goes down, the price will remain the same or go up, because corporates are about maximizing profits. Period! If they are making $10 a widget now, and can reduce their costs to make the widget by 50%, they just maximized their profit and are now setting the level of profit expected by that new amount. All bonuses for the management will now be based on this new profit margin, and the worker will still trudge through production, further widening the gap between the haves and have nots.
@cloudy-
I am a conservative cheesehead and BHO's words are what scares me....Walker seems to have taken a page out of Obama's book and it may backfire on him. And that's the last thing we need to have happen here. No one from either side likes stuff rammed down their throats and only have a week to consider it. While a approve of the proposal, the way it's playing out may do more long term harm than good.
As a person born and raised in wisconsin, this vote tears my heart out.
The problem in this country, not just WI, was caused by big business and politicians. The republicans are blaming workers.
REMEMBER:
Workers didn't cause the housing collapse, Banks and Business did.
Workers didn't cause gas & oil prices over $3.50 a gallon, politicians and big business did.
Workers didn't cause the wall street collapse, Bernie madorff did, with his cronies and of course santioned by politicians.
Teachers didn't cause the education problem, the republican "No Chil left Behind" policy did it.
DO NOT BLAME THE WORKERS
Brilliant, brilliant, BRILLIANT... Precipitate the greatest recession in American History through deregulation. Fight a preemptive war (Daddy's war) without raising taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Give tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires and think the jobs are going to fall mana from heaven (didn't happen). And after all this you blame the tanked economy on working Americans! Brilliant!
@ Futyler Tolosa,
You forget one thing. We have to stop buying from those companies who are outsourcing our jobs to other countries "to maximize profits". I stopped buying from Wal-Mart and Target because most of the items they sell are products made in other countries. I actually went in and looked for the "Made in the USA" label and didn't see it on 80% of the items. As long as we reward these companies for doing away with the American Worker, we are sunk, we just don't know it.
Brilliant, brilliant, BRILLIANT... Precipitate the greatest recession in American History through deregulation. Fight a preemptive war (Daddy's war) without raising taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Give tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires and think the jobs are going to fall mana from heaven (didn't happen). Give tax breaks to corporations to send jobs overseas (sounds like treason to me.) Now wrap it all up in the American flag, show an American Eagle (do you hear the screech) and the best photo op of all history (Bush standing on top of the ruble of 9/11) -presto! And after all this you blame the tanked economy on working Americans! Brilliant!
Critical Thinker... Teachers were doing poorly long before NCLB became law. On the other hand, You had Michelle Rhee in DC firing the bad teachers and student averages were going up yearly.
Gas is so high not solely because of our politicians. OPEC members pretty much determine gas prices.
The housing collapse happened from Banks offering the homes because the Gov told them to. The worker is at fault for taking up ARM loans that they should have been smart enough to not take.
Banks had more to do with the Wall Street collapse than Madoff.
Futyler Tolosa, you and your ilk who help vote the Republicans into office, are the reason why America is falling into Second World status with Third World status not far behind. You don't seem to get the fact that if wages, benefits, etc. are cut, the corporations are not going to slash prices or the cost of food won't go down. It is all about money. Why do you think companies go overseas to make their products and avoid taxes in the US, because the bottom line to them is how much money they can make. They don't care about your welfare or anybody else. It is money and greed!
Thanks for nothing and dragging the USA down. The race to the bottom has only just begun.
Let me guess - your not a Working American? Or if you are you are the exception and everyone is not up to your standards? What is it about people on the right - they constantly do the, "I'm more patriotic then you" at every turn but yet they seem to have at their heart an utter contempt for their fellow Americans! It isn't about loving America... it is about loving your fellow man (I think I heard someone called Jesus talking about this).
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - BLAME THE VICTIM! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
Note the somewhat idiotic belief that:
A: Labor costs will decline
B: That imaginary decline in costs would lead to lower prices
The real problem is that coorporations have no compeititon, and the ones that do typically do not compete on price [Its all about the "Features" now]. As there is no price compeititon, there is no mechanism to lower prices.
Coorporations have had their most profitable years in history, partly due to a decline in wages that has been going on for well over a decade. And tell me, have prices of goods dropped in proportion to our declining wages? Absolutly NOT!
Supply-side theory is hopelessly flawed, it assumes that if a good is made for cheap, someone, somewhere will buy it, creating an economic exchange. Problem is, even this theory depends that people have the WAGES to pay for said goods. As wages continue to decline, consumer spending will also drop, eventually reaching a point where the economy will tumble. You see this same EXACT mechanic in the current recession.
As such, you produce a short-term savings, but long term economic disaster, all based on a theory economists have largly said would never work for the past 30 years. And in response to that trouble, you'll see these same people give coorporations even more cost savings, at the expense of the worker, driving down consumer spending even more.
The US economy is looking more and more like the Mexican one each day. A small upper class that controls the majority of the wealth, and a large lower class with no money to spend. Coorporations do GREAT, exporting to other countries, but at home, due to no one buying goods, the economy is in the pits. This WILL happen to the US, and Republicans will have no one but themselves to blame.
PleaseNo: You reference the very first comment by Cloudy who floated us all a bit of misinformed 'ramming'.
Those words were spoken from the podium by Michael Steele on his exit. They were Steele's very last two words as Chair of RNC and he would not deny it.
You can't sell an American good to a Mexican because mexicans don't have money to spend, because they aren't paid in the first place. And as a results of those savings, Mexican goods can undercut american ones.
Democrats solution: Allow workers to make more money, giving them the ability to pay for the higher quality [american] goods.
Republicans solution: Reduce worker wages farther, so coorporations can [maybe] reduce their profits to make their goods more attractive.
I'll take the first, thanks. Its sad that Americans don't think their wages should be adjusted to match inflation anymore...
This movement should be extencded to ALL UNIONs. The leader in Egypt was like the Union and the people got fedup. What puts Union workers above Public workers? Bias to get free bene's,pay and time off. Unions at all levels (local to Federal) should be outlawed. Ones skills will reflect ones pay. It's time to be accountable for tax money at ALL LEVELs and stop the FREE Ride for Unions.
The same liberals who claim to be champions of the unions (and workers) buy foreign goods at much higher rates than conservatives. Boy they (libs) sure do complain about all the jobs being shipped over seas....AND THEN THEY BUY FOREIGN PRODUCTS!
Want proof? go to a democratic fundraiser and look at how may toyota's and subaru's are in the parking lot. Go to a republican one and you will see a sea of F-150's
I hope everyone who is cheering this vote also applauds the fact that they made sure the fat cats on the top get to keep more of the money they won't have to pay the workers of this country. They knew what they were doing, first secure my right to amass more wealth than man has every made, second stick it to the workers. GOP dream come true.
Its not the worker making 20 dollars an hour that makes the levi's unobtainable. Its the management overhead that doen't put anything into the actual product but rakes in 540 dollars an hour. How is this is union's fault?
Mike Kelley
I'm in a public sector union, started working at age 20.
After 15 years in, the union helped me fight for a promotion I deserved but didn't get due to nepotsim, with the unions help I won. Now I have 30 years in but I will have to put in at least 15 to 20 more for FULL Benifits (if I and they still exist then) thats 45 to 50 years of service.
I will recieve no SS benefits, and due to recent changes most likely will have to pay for Supplemental insurance out of my pension.
Retirement Age extension is being bandied about at the state house which could add up to 5 yrs to my retirement plans. (what are those?)
With Health care benefits decreasing while costs are increasing. Things aren't looking so good there either.
Property taxes keep increasing taking along my fixed rate mortage which aint looking so fixed.
I WISH I had a job paying $60K a year, even so
Thanks to the UNION I HAVE a job AND Healthcare.
15,000 ? You do realize that would not even fill one end zone section of Lambeau Field. Kinda weak for a blue state. Ah, we all miss the 60's when the Left knew how to protest. Remember Chicago, Daily,bashing some heads, the good ol'days.
And what about the children? All those teachers denying all those children an education. What about the poor children who now will go hungry without their Michelle Obama breakfast, lunch, and dinners? If their parents are forced to feed them they might get fat !
Unions are killing Wisconsin children !
Hey, this is fun acting like a Democrat.
Amazing, just amazing.
The teachers let the students get out of class to attend this rally, and the students really have no idea why they are there in the first place (see below link). Maybe the students are failing some of their classes and are getting "credits" for attending.
Other videos show sideline "cheerleaders" provoking the students in their protests. A close look at some of these "cheerleaders" might have one envision them as a teacher. Take a close look to the bottom left of the following video:
If I were a parent paying for my child's higher education and the child was one of these UNIFORMED protesters, I would be extremely UPSET.
You ARE aware of where those cars are actually assembled, right? You kinda blew up your own argument...
WTH are you smoking?
Nothing. They simply put forward an agreement that Business/States AGREED TO. Nothing is stopping individual business/states from not resigning a deal with a union and replacing the workers, after all.
The benifits package is paid for as part of the labor agreement, no different then your standard employer sponsered healthcare package. And LOTS of private sector fails have personal time off policies [at least here in NY].
Yes, workers have no rights to negotiate their own pay, it must be mandated for them. How very un-democratic.
That assumes that competing business offer compeiting wages. No compeititon leads directly to wage deflation, such as we've seen for the past decade in the private sector. But hey, guess that means an american worker is worth less today then he was in 2000...
Yes, in a PERFECT capitalist environment, there would be no need for Unions. That being said, as coorporations do not compete significantly [especially on prices and wages], we see the deadly combination of rising prices and falling wages. Hence, Unions are still needed.
What "free rides" are you referring to? Yes, some unions desperatly need reform [most teachers unions need to wake up, and understand that performance based, and not longevity based tenure is the way to go], but the majority of unions do NOT get "free rides", and in fact are worse off then their private sector counterparts.
Look Byl and others supporting these unions. Let's just say we take all of the assets from the rich and spread it around to the states and federals government. Fine, lets be generous and say we lower our debt across the board 50%.
THEN WHAT?
Then you only have the middle class paying taxes and the level of spending will STILL not be sustainable. You still have federal, state and local employees stomping their feet saying GIMME, GIMME, GIMME.
It's been a good run, but it's time to stop the madness. NO ONE has a RIGHT to a generous pension plan or health insurance or anything except, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I'm sorry not everyone can be management or business owner material. That's life. You can, however, work your butt off to get to a level of self sustainable if you choose. If the world were made up of nothing but executives very little would get done, but at the same time, if the world were made up of only blue collar workers, we would have never see the advancements we have. In order for the private sector to succeed, someone has to have the money to start a business or the idea or know how or sheer determination. Only then can they employee those without those attributes. Without the private sector the public sector cannot survive.
profits and management will always be the same. the only thing that effects costs is workers pay. so there you go. anytime they have to pay someone $20/hr to sew a seam, then that garment is going to be too expensive for most americans. my wife is a RN with degfree and 20+ yrs experience. takes care of all those family members who need special things. she makes $25/hr and has to pay for her own insurance. what makes your sewing machine operator so valuable
This is the funniest quote from the story yet. If the Dems/Libs/Unions want to be taken seriously they need to stop making retarded comments like this;
So Sen. Bob (the nob) Jauch's definition of the democratic process is disrupting the legislative process of the democratically elected Wisconsin House and Senate? Wait! Is he talking about what him and his ilk are doing?
Then you would produce economic growth, raising GDP while the debt remained relativly flat, reducing the proportion of Debt as a percentage of GDP.
The country runs on CONSUMER SPENDING; as such, having 1% of the population make over 50% of the income is NOT a sustainable model. Those figures are actually pretty close to countries like Mexico, and you see how well they are doing...
So, the rising costs of oil, needed for both production and transportation of goods has NOTHING to do with the cost of a good? What about international businiss practices?
Secondly, if workers aren't paid sufficent wages, who is going to purchase the good you spent so much to create? Henry Ford was a genus in that regard; he paid his line workers the then unheard of wage of $1/hr to produce his cars, creating a market for his product in the process. Again, take a country like Mexico, where workers mass produce goods, but can't afford to buy them themselves. Great for the coorporation, who makes a killing overseas, but bad for mexico, which has no real economic growth to show for those proifts.
As long as people believe business profits have ANY effect on economic growth ,the US will continue to struggle economically.
Unions are essentially representative bodies that represent their workers views, no different then a political party. As such, its no stretch to say that taking away Unions rights to negotiate is testamount to being anti-democratic in practice, as your saying that workers have no right to negotiate for fair wages, leaving it up to the company.
it's funny how the CEOs and shareholders keep demanding that the workers need to make less, but the weralthy ceos and shareholders need to make more.
"it's the working class that's the problem, they need to learn to live off of our scraps"
FUTyler, when do you ever sww the CEOs or the stockholders saying that they need to make sacrifices for the company (never)
Actually I didn't say tax the rich (in this thread) what I said was, bust up the unions, give the american worker less of a voice and put the screws to the common man all you want. You won't see a dime of these savings. Not in your taxes, not in your consumer costs, not anywhere. Quality may suffer. Real people may suffer. But not the bottom line for the already wealthy.
So if I take your fantasy land trip where we tax the wealthy 50% What would happen then? Most likely we'd see infrastructure being rebuilt, schools would get the fixes they desperately need, there may be new shelters opened for the less fortunate. I can see how this bleak world view would make you quake in your boots.
# 2 restored for clarity.
Wanna compete with the world? Try eliminating the profit entitlement.
"The story around the world is the rush to democracy," said Democratic Sen. Bob Jauch of Poplar. "The story in Wisconsin is the end of the democratic process."
Nice try at a 'spin', but it would seem that STOPPING a vote by democratically elected legislators more nearly constitutes the 'end of the democratic process'.
Not a bus ride. He pointed out that the Republicans drove the economy into a ditch, in large part by catering to wealthy special interest groups; that it had been left to others to pull the car out; and now that the car was ready to get back on the road, "We can't have special interests sitting shotgun. We have to have middle class families up front."
It was an analogy to a family car ride.
skelmbc
progress would be slower and more sustainable. The biggest thing that would occur under your scenario is that the peak wealth would be distributed evenly enough so that the accumulations could not be used to subvert the will and needs of the many, as is not the case today with the corporate ownership of government and the actions of the unjust, greedy evil men who have destroyed us for their own gain as they owe no allegiance to nation, only allegiance to mammon.
Hmmm, my workers made me profits, big profits. Hmm do I share with them for their increased effort, or do I pocket it as my due. Hmmm, guess I'm the decider. Screw them.
When there is plenty it belongs to me. When there is want, we share.
Save the world, kill a captitalist.
Cloudy,
That's a very fair point about Obama's "We won" quote. I was very diasppointed with that comment from Obama. One of the reasons I voted for him was that I didn't believe him to the kind of person to say stuff like "I earned capital and now I intend to spend it". Yet he did.
Still, at some point you'd think one side or the other would learn from history.
1) GOP pushes too hard, ignores left.
2) Dems win in a landslide.
3) GOP legislation is wiped out and then some.
4) Dems push too hard, ignore right... wash, rinse, repeat.
Leaving aside the particular legislation, I just don't see the value in pushing something through that is so vehemently opposed by the other side. Not only does it get you kicked out of office the next cycle, but it ends of facing the same fate the healthcare law now seems destined to face.
Seems to me Walker and the GOP have a better opportunity to leave some sort of lasting legacy by making some concessions...
Futyler Tolosa..................the one problem I have with your claim of cheaper goods from other country's is easy...what those people are paid are not living wages and their governments only allow them to do so much. As for cheaper cost in goods. you are also getting cheaper products....however, if you will notice, all name brand products now made in theis country that are sold in most stores are made either in China, Japan or Korea..but those same products are no cheap by any means.
This is still the United States of America and the Constitution has not yet been buried, so if I wish to speak, even if I am a minority, I will still be able to do that. So, screw your "sitting down and shutting up".
Uhmmm....does anyone actually READ the article they are commenting on? Where is there one word about corporations? This is about public employees that are paid by the state and taxpayer.
Scrambolo....while I understand your post, and although you say you're retired, I doubt you're old enough to remember a time when workers had no rights.
Up until the early 1900's and the real formation of organized unions, there were a lot situations of laborers being used and abused. We've come a long way.
Unions were there to protect the safety of workers. Today we have OSHA, along with other local and state agencies, that require employers to maintain a safe working environment
Unions prevented employers from taking advantage of poor economic times by exploiting workers with slave labor wages. This was before a federal minimum wage was established.
Unions provided benefits and forced employers to provide benefits to those injured on the job or laid off. Workers compensation laws are in every state and mandate that an employer is responsible for the injuries, lost wages and any disability a person suffers in their course of employment. Unemployment now covers those that involuntarily lose their position for a period of time until they can get another job.
Unions forced employers to allow people to retire and pay them via pensions, etc. Today we have social security. It wasn't around when Unions were still needed.
Unions were formed to protect workers from having to work extreme hours. The departments of labor of each state now mandate that. They also have child labor laws to prevent the exploitation of the youthful.
So, what exactly do unions do besides allowing someone to work for a lower wage if they want? It is a free country.
This absence tactic has been done before in other states.
After the minority GOP obstructed 420 bills passed by the House from 2009 to 2010 elections, they got a lot of nerve criticizing the Dems on anything like this.
The WI bill is really an assault on unions, not about the budget. As usual, GOP has tried a bait and switch to try and get what it really wants. Dems literally didn't stand for it.
the reason why he and the the other pos left, or should i say, went to go pout, was so they could help ag on the issue tearing the state apart. but hey.... what part of broke dont these idiots understand? oh, i forgot, nothing new when it comes to democrats, and the unions, the word "BROKE" just isnt in their vocabulary. well there's 2 ways to go about this, i see walker taking the more responsible approach, trying to at least keeping the people working. but hey... you want to do it that way fine! then dont bother crying when your standing in the unemployment line with the rest of us.... cause to be perfectly honest, it doesnt matter to me either way. welcome to today people, where you cant have everything your way without a little sacrifice....
now go to your corners and pout some more.
attn libbie Jethro's
you have posted on and babbled about and dished on MANY things that conservatives have said and VERY SELDOM qouted "verbatim" what was said...but then that is the way of the Jethro's
here is what your king did say and it's pretty damn m close to what the poster said, not to mention that your claims of "superior intellect" would lead one to belive that you "got the message"
He said: "we can't have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don't mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back."
kinda hard to tell if the stupidity of denying what he said is an act or real......you look it up
Hey fool, why are we broke...oh yeah it was Boob JR that almost put us into another great depression-so forgive me if I don't take Republitards economic advice!
Bottom line teachers are paid terribly, and deserve to get some sort of retirement. They take your little gems and educate them-you don't help at all, you don't even pay attention. They work well over forty hours/week without extra pay to teach your kids. My wife was supposed to get an increase in pay from 40K/yr to 45 (after working 20yrs(!), but the state froze her automatic step (step up is for number of years on the job). She now gets paid about 6k more than a starting teacher for 20yrs experience. She loves her job, but is strangled with paperwork, and having to update a computer grade line (for 3rd grade) that nobody reads! Parents are mostly grateful for her work, but are too busy to show up on parent night (my wife attends for free). She gets slightly more respect than a day care employee, and pay that most college grads (those who major in USEFUL areas) would not accept. She has a friend who is single, with no kids, who cannot afford to buy a house on her pay-she will NEVER be able to afford a house on her own! So before you applaud the Republitards for being so smart and thrifty, remember that their goal is to destroy public education, and so far, they are winning!
Why should the Dems vote if their vote will not change anything? The Republicans own it. Why should I vote if I am not either Dem or GOP? They own the government.
Why would the Dems do this in full view of the world if they had any other worthwhile choice?
This, is a civil war without bullets.
they deserve to work like everyone else...one would think that our children would have better educations given to babble you posted...try "Waiting for Superman" for a glimpse of what teachers unions are doing to the public school system...it ain't pretty
hey Jill...did you say the same thing when the Healthcare Reform Scam and the Stupulous Bill were being crafted behind closed doors?...I think not, that is not the way of the liberal Jethro, or Jethrine as the case may be
Duck
so you are telling us that the all powerful union crime syndicate didn't properly "colletively bargain" for your wife...that sounds like a personal problem...and shows that being part of the union crime syndicate isn't that helpfull now doesn't it
how many of these "teachers" have missed school time hanging out at the statehouse?...that is tantamount to a strike and they should be fired for an illegal strike...
...oh , and according to people in the city , these people have been leaving litter all over the place , also typical of the liberal Jethro, you know, "save the environment" and all...
skeptic
you liberal Jethro's had a "super majority" during that time and a Jethro in the White House...republicans couldn't obstruct anything without the help of some of your liberal Jethro's...
Joe
I have used some of those examples over the years...the Jethro's don't want to hear it...
good post...............
usually when someone walks off the job, they're fired. How are those democrat senators still employed?
AND.......why are school children being dragged to these protests? That's no place for a child
@ Joe 2.75
Everything you have state is true. We have LAWS which were passed because of unions which protect workers. However currently in the state of Wisconsin we have a LAW which says that public employees have the right to collectively bargain. The current legislature is trying to pass a NEW LAW which will take away that right. What is to stop national legislators from passing NEW LAWS which can do away with OSHA, minimum wage, etc. Then where will we be?
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
...
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.
--Pastor Martin Niemöller
"However, Niemöller only gradually abandoned his sympathies with National Socialism and even made pejorative remarks about Jews of faith while protecting—in his own church—baptised Christians, persecuted as Jews by the Nazis, due to their or their forefathers' Jewish descent. In one sermon in 1935, he remarked: "What is the reason for [their] obvious punishment, which has lasted for thousands of years? Dear brethren, the reason is easily given: the Jews brought the Christ of God to the cross!"
hmmm...sound like Mel Gibson
how come the liberal Jethro's aren't up in arms about the Hilter signs and other such hate speech from the criminal teachers union crime syndicate members who are striking illegally?
they aren't because liberal Jethro's aren't really against "hate speech" when they are the one leveling it. Where is Obobo the Clown and his "civility" sermons?...hate speech is the Jethro forte and it is one of their finest traits
Judging from pretty much every post here, nothing but the headline. I'm not sure some of them made it all the way through that.
Can we get the Dems to go hide in another country? Mexico seems to like them.
Isn't there any kind of law forbidding public servants from leaving their job simply because they have no idea what to do?
commonsense..."He pointed out that the Republicans drove the economy into a ditch"
That 'sound bite' is getting a little old. A Republican President and a Democratic Congress may have driven the economy to the side of the road, but it was the Democrats in total control that "Drove the car into the ditch".
Obama never said that. Stop lying.
Liberal Democrats didnt seem to mind when Obama said it? Guess that makes Obama a racist?
Lawmakers running out of town? People take to the streets? What are we, Egypt?
The left couldn't say enough evil about the "radical" Tea Partiers, organizing protests and rallies. But then, protests and rallies are only noble if run by liberals, didn't you know?
Can you imagine what they would have said if the Repubs ran away when it came time for the Health Care Reform vote? I think Joe on Main Street can see the hypocrisy here and is not buying into it.
Yes Critical Thinker (Maine), blame the worker is right and blame the unions. Unions have created an environment that promotes greed and laziness amongst the members, not to mention strong arming idiot demorats into signing these ridiculous agreements that have all but bankrupted those liberal states. Look at CA, NY, NJ the list goes on and on.
Why shouldn't these people be accountable for their jobs just as the rest of us are? Unions are a disease, we've got the cure.
Everyone keeps referring to one state that has teachers getting paid $110,000/yr. That amound does not apply to all states. I'm in California. My step-mother, as I mentioned before, just retired from teaching High School. Her Salary before retiring after nearly 40 years of teaching was $70,000/yr. She has a masters degree in English. A masters degree in many other fields brings in six figures in most cases. So a degreed individual that has chosen to teach is getting paid less than people with the same level of education going into business.
Furthermore, where does the States cut back on first when they are experiencing financial crises? They attack the public education and start cutting back on educational programs which means cutting back on teacher's jobs.
Of all the programs that our taxes paid for, Education is one that IS a good tax expense. They need to cut back on the useless programs that are generally kept because they are some legislator's baby.
I do agree that Public School Teachers need to be held accountable with how they are teaching. And stop passing our kids, just to get rid of them. Not all districts are guilty of this problem, but enough are that are making the news and giving the profession a bad name.
You guys knocking on the teachers, you are going to end up shooting yourselves in the foot. You need to tackle the teaching problems from another angle and not attacking their bargaining power.
Breaking up Unions has always been on the Republican Agenda since the first Unions were established. The American Legion was established by the Republican Party for the sole purpose of breaking up Unions back in the 1920's when they were speading Anti-Semitic and Anti-Communist Propaganda after WWI.
Hmmm, I guess you think this video was doctored huh?
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-to-gop-%E2%80%98they-can-come-for-the-ride-but-they-have-to-sit-in-back/
I bet you think he never called Republicans the ENEMY either? Tell me, does that include BLACK republicans or just the white ones?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnnwJ1rgCnM&feature=related
actually, most unions will take the cut when there isn't any other choice. the real problem with whats happening here is the attempt to completely destroy the public employee unions. I do feel tht they have grown too powerful at the state level, and need to reduce their influence, but gutting them completely without even talking beforehand is not going to help anyhting.
DrowningGrover
"The price goes up, wages go down, and CEO profits/bonuses soar soar soar!"
So, bottom line is that you are jealous of the success of others and feel that they owe you something. They don't. You have the right to pursue happiness, but not at the expense of others. Make it on your own and become an America dream.
so Bob, does the "Pursuit of the almighty dollar" justify any action that will make the poor even poorer as long as the rich and powerful are allowed to keep them "in their place"?
it's one thing if the CEO increases profitability of a company without putting it entirely on the backs of the employees, I agree that they should be rewarded well for doing just that. it's another thing when the CEO forces the employess to take cuts in pay and benefits while collecting an enormous bonus and not taking a similar salary cut and still recieving a ridiculous bonus for forcing employees to suffer. any idiot can just cut employees/employee pay and tell them "work harder".
actually they do, they owe an employee a decent wage for a decent job done. something that you clearly don't comprehend.
Welcome to the real world.
Welcome to the poor people/rich people world.
Ya say ya want a revolution...?
Please explain the real world??? Like when the private sector brings this country to its knees and no one is responsible for the mess they created??? How many people has the justice department prosecuted for the financial mess??? NOT ONE, so not only is it ok to steal and commit fraud but will give you all the money you need to fix the problem, right. Or would you speaking of the real world where we must honor contracts for AIG and the likes but low hanging fruit such as public employees contracts because we all live in our mansions driving Maserati's to our $50,000 jobs, really??? These people are your neighbors and friends, oh and by the way they pay a portion of their own salary by the mere fact that they live and work for the State or local municipality. Do you pay a portion of your salary??? Democrats are awful but the Republicans are even worse... I assume you are making over $250,000, oh no, so you protecting your future lottery winnings??? get real...
Well said Scott. In the real world we all get paid based upon our efforts...not adjustments to inflation or pre-negotiated wage increases. We are also employed at will.
The public sector employees should be held to the same standards. That's not harsh...it's fair.
Wake up America!
they said in the article that wisconsin has been a rock of "employees rights".
when did it become a "RIGHT" to be a union worker?
here in texas the union is weaker than a 3 dollar bill. the unions have no "rights" here since texas is a right to work state. so how is this infringing on their liberties?
infact....
how many parents had to stay home to watch the kids?
so the union is showing just why this needs to happen. they have affected more lives than just their own by staying home, so way to go unions!!!!
keep proving exactly why your methods are outdated!!
your lucky to have a job you over paid do nothings!!
"we all get paid based upon our efforts"
REALLY Dave? Since when was a teaching job a piece of cake? Those people who make sure your brats don't turn out to be idiots probably clock more hours in a week than you do in a month. It isn't a 9-5 job.
Add to that the money they spend out of their own pockets just to make sure the kids have supplies (because the schools can't afford to pay for it), the 30+ kids per class that they are responsible for, AND the ungrateful, idiot parents who refuse to understand why their kid got an "F" for never doing their homework, and their Level of Effort probably far surpases yours or any of your coworkers. It is a truly thankless position, proven by the attitudes demonstrated on this forum alone.
Here is a dose of reality: you think these people are so useless? then pull your kids out of school and see how far they get in life
OMG really...
Umm - Texas is an "at will" state. My employer makes everyone sign a document every year stating we understand that.
People should be outraged to see unions attacked. Unions are the reason we have child labor laws, minimum wage and those things (pesky to corporations) that we call benefits - workers rights, 40 horu workweeks, paid time off including vacation, etc.
The more power this country gives to corporations via their puppets, the Republicans, the more I see us returning, not just to the late 1800s, but all the way back to Europe of the Dark Ages when business owners paid people starvation wages because THEY COULD.
Next stop nepotism and cronyism in government hiring.
I agree, welcome to the real world.
Boy you conservatives sheep following lost puppies just don't get it. Unions bulit this country, yes not all Unions are good, but the majority of them do a good job. I love how you think that public employees do nothing make to much and have great benefits. You don't know "WTH" you are talking about most of these people make 30,000 a year and pay taxes just like you and me. Bottom line is this is nothing but union busting period. There has never been any conservative President that has ever done anything good for the American people. All of the labor laws workers protection rights, were started by unions, and the democratic party. You sheep won't wake up until this country becomes a 3rd world country. The conservatives want people to work for pennies $7-$10 an hour with very little benefits. Try living on that wage. Its not the unions fault that the states gov't screwed up the money that was there same can be said for the feds. If this continues i can see the American people standing up to these whack jobs and what you see happening in the Middle East will happen here.
Seriously! The first thing this corporate shill (Governor) did in office was give large corporations massive tax breaks. Why does this all sound familiar! According to several independent sources what had been essentially budget "neutrality" become a short fall!!! Guess who is making up the difference - working Americans. But that isn't the only reason why you will see this trend going Nation wide - the Republican's are going after the collective bargaining of "all" state and federal workers because they have traditionally supported the Democratic Party. This is POLITICS
dressed up as fiscal austerity (Carl Rove said as much - the only honest thing he has ever said)! Corporations will in the end be the only entities that benefit from Citizens United and armies of lobbyists. Wake up people - in the end they will privatize everything including the police and the fire department. Your house will burn if you missed a payment and Black Water will be the local constabulary. You think I'm joking - when it is all done and said America will have the look and feel of a some science fiction movie where morally bankrupt and yes overtly evil corporations are the government and run everything! Oh, and they will throw the best of the 19th century into the mix for good measure - debtors prison, work houses, cities suffocating in pollution (see London Fog). Our economy was tanked by Republican deregulation and Corporate greed and now there using the outcome as a pretext for going after American workers and every aspect of a once great and progressive society!
Texas has the fastest growing population because so many people from liberal union states are having to move there to find jobs. People should get paid equivalent to the value they create. Unions are only around to falsely elevate the wages above the value.
Unions made the middle class possible. When they and all they worked to build is dismantled. You peasants on the right will be the first to moan, cry and whine about how bad things are. But who are you going to blame then?
What's both hilarious and sad is that if you guys on the right get your way. Eventually liberals will get tired of your whining and build you new Unions to protect you. And yeah you'll fight us all the way when we do. Then when the world doesn't end you'll join the unions and become proud members enjoying your benefits, salary, house, and shiny car that you "earned". You'll get all patriotic about how we live in the best country on earth and how you all worked so hard to get it there without any help. Then a natural recession will hit and someone on the right will say its those freaking unions strangling our businesses! And then you'll all jump right back in. Well that's assuming there isn't a new minority to blame at the time.
Cloudy wrote:
You didn't. Why should we?
Markets Work -- People should get paid equivalent to the value they create. Unions are only around to falsely elevate the wages above the value.
You got it!
Really Markets!! then why is Texas unemployment rate is above 9% I have friends that live in Texas and its not that great down there is you say and think it is. You have a whacked out Governor also who thinks that Texas should succeed from the union.
Brilliant, brilliant, BRILLIANT... Precipitate the greatest recession in American History through deregulation. Fight a preemptive war (Daddy's war) without raising taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Give tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires and think the jobs are going to fall mana from heaven (didn't happen). Give tax breaks to corporations to send jobs overseas (sounds like treason to me.) Now wrap it all up in the American flag, show an American Eagle (do you hear the screech) and the best photo op of all history (Bush standing on top of the ruble of 9/11). And after all this you blame the tanked economy on working Americans! Brilliant!
Tank repeating your posts does not make you any more right.
As a 21 year union member, this NEEDS to happen. Sad but true.
If the state goes bankrupt they can void all union contracts.
The state is billions in the hole... they can not raise taxes enough to cover the deficit, and the rich can vote with their feet (move)
Cry all you want, it must happen to protect EVERYONE in the state
Texas unemployment rate is much less than the national average and has experienced the most population growth. Texas has more net job creation in the past fews years than the other 49 states combined. Rick Perry doesn't want to seceed, but most of his constiteunts do. It is the bizarre "give me what I want - not earn" mentality that is crushing the country and dragging Texas down with it. Quit moaning about your wage and focus on what you are worth. Wages must equal the value someone will pay for the service.
I sense a great Leftist angst rocking the rose colored Leftist Wack Job world. I've noticed that a lot of reposting is going on with the same info.
Right Tank?
Rodney-1111620,
I apologize, though my words bare repeating. Now let me ask you did you understand what I was saying - this whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - blame the victim! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
Lies, that distinction goes to New York.
i would venture to say, Wisconsin's problems occured as a result of the politicians putting the general fund into the stock market. During to good years, nobody noticed. Now the stock market crashed, the general fund is $ XX Billion in the hole, but it's not the unions that caused it.
The unions keep the wolves at bay. Big business is the enemy.
The republicans are blaming workers.
REMEMBER:
Workers didn't cause the housing collapse, Banks and Business did.
Workers didn't cause gas & oil prices over $3.50 a gallon, politicians and big business did.
Workers didn't cause the wall street collapse, Bernie madorff did, with his cronies and of course santioned by politicians.
Teachers didn't cause the education problem, the republican "No Chil left Behind" policy did it.
DO NOT BLAME THE WORKERS
15,000 protesters ? You do realize that would not even fill one end zone section of Lambeau Field. Kinda weak for a blue state. Ah, we all miss the 60's when the Left knew how to protest. Remember Chicago, Daley,bashing some heads, the good ol'days. Now, all we have is the lame Obama Rent-A-Mobs. From out of state no less.
And what about the children? All those teachers denying all those children an education. What about the poor children who now will go hungry without their Michelle Obama breakfast, lunch, and dinners? If their parents are forced to feed them they might get fat !
Unions are killing Wisconsin children !
Hey, this is fun acting like a Democrat. Hold that bus I want to join the runaways!
Amazing, just amazing.
The teachers let the students get out of class to attend this rally, and the students really have no idea why they are there in the first place (see below link). Maybe the students are failing some of their classes and are getting "credits" for attending.
Other videos show sideline "cheerleaders" provoking the students in their protests. A close look at some of these "cheerleaders" might have one envision them as a teacher. Take a close look to the bottom left of the following video:
If I were a parent paying for my child's higher education and the child was one of these UNIFORMED protesters, I would be extremely UPSET.
Sven - I sense a great Leftist angst rocking the rose colored Leftist Wack Job world
Yes, the great leftist angst of watching while a government of the people for the people dismantles the rights of the worker. The rose colored glasses we wear that makes us think we should have some rights in the work place. That employees shouldn't be subjected to dangerous conditions and we should be paid a living wage. The Wack Job world of the middle class that just doesn't understand how to sit down and shut up when the rich bosses are talking. We will learn someday, once the right has stripped the people's power.
You cry about the government providing too much for the people while you dismantle the protections we have from the corporations who want to take everything away from us they can.
Byl,
LOL! What are you doing wasting time posting on the internet?! Get back to working your 90 hours a week at $.15 an hour or I'll give your job to Marley. Marley won't complain. And Marley won't ask for seconds of gruel. Then it's debtors prison for you. You lazy shiftless good for nothing ungrateful slob! Now get back to work oiling that moving weaver! I don't care if it's dangerous. You'll do your job it you know what's good for you! Booohwwaaaaaa!
You do know how silly you sound, right? You've referenced a bunch of federal labor laws. Time to join the real world son. Time to get a job and earn your keep. Do a good job and you will be rewarded. Now run along.
Actually, Tank, if you don't follow the liberal kool-aid drinkers, you would realize that the current economic woes are equally shared by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. It was Bill Clinton put the law in place that allowed the banks to work as investment, commercial, and insurance institutions. That led to the massive issuance of subprime loans which in turn caused the housing crisis. George W. Bush's allowance for further deregulation just added the match to the dynamite. If you couldn't tell, I am an independent with some libertarian leanings.
I am a unionized public employee. My position was reclassified five years ago. I asked at that time if my position could be made non-union and was denied that request. I was moved from a bad union, which allowed me to reclaim some of my dues on the point of disagreeing with whom political funds were provided, to an even worse union. I have been a model employee with "exceeds expectations" on all reviews. I have asked my union for mediation help on one occasion where I didn't even receive a response to my request. I have to pay into my retirement account to get any matching funds. I pay private sector amounts for my health benefits. I do get seniority benefits if layoffs occur... but those have not occurred in the seven years I have been here. I basically see no benefit to paying $55 per pay check to the union in exchange for nothing in return.
I don't agree with the largest and worst union in the world, the "tenure union." Time in service should not make it impossible to fire a bad employee. I think the greatest problem in the education system is a lack of aid from parents, but we shouldn't have to continue to throw bad money after bad money. I did a search for statistics of the local average teacher salary: $65k. That's more than most of the people make in my district, an urban area that is considered in the top ten for unemployment and violent crime. My child's teacher (this year) is good, but my wife and I put in a lot of time so that our first grader is reading at a third grader's level.
I live in Ohio and, our governor is working on a similar proposal. I wish him luck because the unions have actually hurt Ohio's chances of bringing in new business.
If this is not dereliction of duty and impeachable, I don't know what is.
Take your abll and run home if you don't get your way, Dems and libs.
tapecah:
You won't receive SS bennies because you didn't pay into the SS system. In the private sector, I must pay 7.5% of my pay into the SS system AND my employer has to match it! That is the law of the land. Public employees and legislators are exempt from that so they can fund their own pension and then, at least here in Ca., that pension fund invests in the stock market. If the fund loses money, we taxpayers are required by state law to replace it!
No such laws exist for private sector employees. I have worked for two Fortune 500 companies, and only the one I work for now provides a match of 3 percentage points on the 401k. I lost half of my IRA during the last crash. Are the taxpayers going to replace that? Yeah, right.
Once again, exercising corporate censorship, all of the comments that MSNBC/Comcast chose to hightlight under Comments on their coverage of this story were supportive of the Governor, and anti-union. Sad, but predictable. I wonder how long it will be before they start censoring here on the Vine.
New York created the most jobs..........LOL Not even in the top three!
actually, it was the republican led congress that Clinton had to work with and enough blue-dog democrats to override any veto.
remember, it was that repeal of the glass-stiegal act created to prevent great depressions that led to our own depression.
the banking and corporate schills are doing their job well. accept less and work more.
Workers have had a right to collective bargaining for some time now.
This is a scream - Democracy means "majority rule" - Democrats can't STAND it!
They continually try to force a leftist minority outlook down the publics throat then yell "fascism!" when they can't succeed! Or leave the state - so much for their "democracy".
Note to Dems: Communism is dead. Get over it.
Guess President Obama will have to thank the governor of Wisconsin for turning Wisconsin into a BLUE State.
Unions did not build this country. Americans built this country. Freedom and capitalism made it possible. Unions lately have helped destroy entire industries with the aid of our socialist leaning government.
Dismantle the common sense regulations created at the end of the Great Depression. Give tax breaks to corporations to send their manufacturing and jobs overseas. Fight Daddy's War and not raise taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Precipitate the greatest recession in American History (then blame on the Democrats and home owners). Extend tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires in an economic downturn (lie about it creating jobs) and then BLAME THE VICTIMS. This is not about fiscal conservatism - this is all about politics. Republican want to destroy the right of collective bargaining so only corporations can benefit from Citizens United. BRILLIANT!!!
Lolly1192..(#3.4)...I think you don't quite have your facts right...or you trying to be "untruthful" about this 30+ kids in a classroom. In Wisconsin there isn't a single school district with more than 19 kids per 1 teacher. The average is 12-16 to 1 .....scroll the page.....
http://www.teachersalaryinfo.com/average-teacher-salary-wisconsin.html
And their benefits equal half their salary....combined for a total of $72,000 for a 180 day work year.
markets has no clue what he's talking about. And i'm guessing he's only parroting what he's heard. Guess what, I live in Texas. Have all my life. The unemployment rate is high here too and the jobs that can be found pay diddly. Employers are now asking for a 4 year degree for a 25-30K year job. We have a butt load of foreclosed homes. And we have the highest number of residents uninsured. And yes it is an "at will' employment state. However, there are unions all over the place in Texas. See Bell Helicopter Textron, my dad was a union man there for 35 years. See MANY of the chemical companies on the Houston ship channel, my husband works there now. See the nurses all over the state. And so on and so on. Texas is looking at a 30 billion dollar budget shortfall. We're closing schools and lord knows what else will be done. ALL of this information can be found right on state websites with a simple google search. But I guess it's much easier to repeat BS than to think for yourself. And Rick Perry is a dimwit who made threats of succession. Then again, Perry would drop to his knees and pucker for Boner in full public view in the middle of Austin at high noon if he thought it'd get him elected
I am sure that the economy in Texas would look a whole lot better if 4.3 million had not move there and taken some of the jobs.
http://www.texasahead.org/economy/outlook.html
Another indicator that the state’s economy has been comparatively healthy was the U.S. Bureau of the Census report that Texas added more people (nearly 4.3 million) than any other state between the census counts of 2000 and 2010.
Entering 2011, more than half the jobs shed by employers during Texas’ shorter recession have already been recovered as our economy recovers more quickly than the U.S. as a whole. Nationally, only 13.4 percent of recession-hit jobs had been recovered ending 2010.
Texas and the nation returned to economic growth in 2010, with the nation increasing its GDP by 2.8 percent and Texas increasing its GSP by 3.4 percent.
I'm bad - I forgot - give the most profitable companies in history subsidies to the tune of billions and billions and billions of dollars! And then they would have you think that it was garbage collectors, teachers and fireman who tanked the economy!
Unions are the antithesis of communism. Some of you righties need to lay off the Glenn Beck show.
Republicans ran on increasing jobs, not on shutting down unions. This governor is in deep water, and will probably only serve one term.
Keep hiding Dems........wait for the compromise.
Teachers taking paid sick days and shutting schools down, denying children their education and nutritious lunch programs is fine with you...and the Elected Senators conspiring and defying an order to report to the chamber is fine with you.....sounds like Rules for Radicals....the end justifies the means....shameful.
Get some education, Mike. Any days missed over the allotted number (for example: snow days) will be made up. That tends to be a school district requirement. Kids are not "losing" anything.
FINALLY!!! Someone who knows their US History. "Reusable bag fan", you get a gold star. :)
Unions aren't destroying America and any rational thinking human can figure that one out - corporate greed is what is destroying America. Getting rid of unions is corporate America's first step on their path to total elimination of worker's rights. Welcome to the new pre-Progressive movement era.
...score 1 point for the Wisconsin Dems & teachers (public employees) union for beating the Repubs & union busters at their own game! ; -)
Yes markets work the only reason that the wages intexas are so low is that employers in texas only hire wetbacks if you think any different go to any construction site in this state and see how many illegals are there as a plumber here i see it every day. If there were uniuns here they might make employers check ss numbers or green cards to see if they were real.Thats also why texas has the shoddiest construction of any of the states ive worked in.
Well ,you have to admit,Brittney has 24 mommies and a well groomed gerbil
Added to Ward Churchill ,
PROGRESSIVES had a pretty rough representation !
LOL
Call in the scab democrats.
Hey Mike,
As a Wisconsin UW student who was in high school last year, I've never had a class with less than 23-24 kids since I was in primary school. My French class during my senior year in high school had 40. My sister, who is a teacher in Madison, teaches a little less than 30 fourth graders Your source is, quite frankly, incorrect. Please don't make statements with the pretense that you are actually informed.
Add to that the money they spend out of their own pockets just to make sure the kids have supplies (because the schools can't afford to pay for it), the 30+ kids per class that they are responsible for, AND the ungrateful, idiot parents who refuse to understand why their kid got an "F" for never doing their homework, and their Level of Effort probably far surpases yours or any of your coworkers. It is a truly thankless position, proven by the attitudes demonstrated on this forum alone.
Here is a dose of reality: you think these people are so useless? then pull your kids out of school and see how far they get in life
I DID IT! I pulled my kids out of public school! Thanks to the REAL no child left behind law in Florida, they enacted school choice. Now, most of the voucher system was knocked down by the courts (thank you teacher's union!), but fortunately for my children, who are mildly autistic, they are able to receive something that was left intact, the McKay Scholarship. It works something like this:
If you have a child with disabilities, and qualify, you receive the same amount of money per child that the State says it costs to educate your children. In Florida, they say that is $8,500 per student. I was granted a total of $25,500 for my three children. So, I was able to enroll my children in private Catholic School for, get this, $13,000 for ALL THREE OF THEM. The class size is ten students per class with a teacher AND teachers aid. There scores have gone up to the point where they may actually be able to attend Catholic High School and are slowly integrating back into regular classes.
Now you explain to me how the Catholic School can do more, do better, for less money. I've got an explanation. No unions, very little overhead and bureaucracy, and decision making at the lowest level (between the teachers and parents).
I am in the military. So, unfortunately, I may have to move at some point to a State that does not have this program. I am actually considering retiring so that my children can continue to benefit from this program.
Having said all this, I have an answer to the current public education system that would not require any of this crazy vote taking or protesting. Simply allow the money to follow the child instead of the child following the money. In other words, you get a voucher from the State for X number of dollars with which you can shop around and take your child to the best school. If you want to send your child to the local public school, then great. Want your kid to go to a public school a couple of miles away, but are willing to drive them back and forth, then fantastic. Want to send them to a private school, then that's okay too. My guess is, that over a relatively short period of time, the public schools and their teachers unions would die a quick death. If they provided the better product, they would survive. My guess is that they would not.
IMJ3
I am sure that the economy in Texas would look a whole lot better if 4.3 million had not move there and taken some of the jobs.
http://www.texasahead.org/economy/outlook.html
Another indicator that the state’s economy has been comparatively healthy was the U.S. Bureau of the Census report that Texas added more people (nearly 4.3 million) than any other state between the census counts of 2000 and 2010.
Entering 2011, more than half the jobs shed by employers during Texas’ shorter recession have already been recovered as our economy recovers more quickly than the U.S. as a whole. Nationally, only 13.4 percent of recession-hit jobs had been recovered ending 2010.
Texas and the nation returned to economic growth in 2010, with the nation increasing its GDP by 2.8 percent and Texas increasing its GSP by 3.4 percent.
**************************************
I live in Texas. You clowns claiming it is an economic paradise have no clue what you're talking about. Texas has a $27 Billion dollar deficit right now. Texas also spends the least per capita on it's residents than any other state.
In Texas we're cutting schools and health-care for the elderly because there's really nothing else to cut. We've created death panels for seniors in poverty. Republicans have controlled the governor's office and legislature since 2000. The "Texas Miracle" is BS.
JPJohnson - Thank you! I also live in Texas and have grown quite weary of the mythology being spread around about how "great" our economy is. Rick Perry has more than doubled our deficit (how's that for "Republican fiscal responsibility") and we might not be able to balance our budget, which is REQUIRED by the Texas constitution. This would be the first time in Texas history if they can't figure out where to find the funds. Inclusively, we're ranked in the middle of all US states with regard to unemployment, not at the top with the lowest rates. Face facts folks, Texas isn't all it's cracked up to be.
don't pop the fantasy bubble of the neo-cons!
"cut taxes, spend more, fight more wars!"
Hey Byl, something that the Right will tell you while they are doing this, is that you need to stop depending on one source of income and that it is your fault that you are depending on working for someone else and making someone else rich on your labor.
In fact, they will tell you that you are no different than they are, just that they are just doing things a little bit differently than you.
They are not leaving it up to some employer or some government program to support them.
The programs are out there for you to make gains on your income by you not depending on someone else for mimimal amount of effort other than taking the time to do some homework.
In fact there is a means for you to stay on top of your 401K plan better than your 401K representative and you only spend about 5 minutes a day doing it.
What's really amazing is all these tools are right there at your fingertips at that computer that you are using to type responses too.
Labor is a cost driver that is over pricing our products to the point that we can't compete with foreign competitors and we can thank the over inflated wages that the unions make employers pay union employees.
Weird. All I see is another Republican holding jobs hostage unless they get their way, and make it so they can tear down unions so they can finally start treating their workers like slaves again. Then again, I never joined the Union when I worked at my local Grocery store, and was fired for having a tourette syndrome breathing tick episode after 2 months steady working there. By all means, Republicans, keep destroying jobs. We all know you're just clearing the way for our new Chinese overlords to pay back your war debts...
“Elections have consequences, and I won.” President Barack Obama -
Grow up you Wisconsin democrats, you tried to fight against it, you tired to stop it, but it is going to pass, and your stunt makes your look silly. Imagine if Republicans did something like this, the outcry would be deafening. Elections have consequences and nobody knows this better then Republicans who saw the worst Health Care bill in the nations history pass, but it did pass because that is how our system works for better or worse.
Byl,
talk about a JOKE!!!!
i am a welder with over 22 yrs on the job exsperiance, and have had the pleasure of working in both union, and non union shops. as far as quality goes, no diffrence. safety, no difference, pay wages, not much difference, actually, i worked 2 non union jobs that started me out with over $2.00 per hr more. employee rights, the only diffrence was after the probationary period, the hard working employee at the union shops turned into automatic slackers. insurance bennifits.. eh.. about the same, not much difference. that list goes on, HOWEVER..... at the non union shops, there were no union dues to pay. no hourly insurance to come out of my check to match the raise i got promised every year. for 4 years i got a dollar an hr raise, each year... my insurance i had to pay into hourly went up... yes $1.00 per hour. as far as union boys being smarter, not even close. the 3 total union shops i worked in had more idiots, who hurt themselves in the most anal of ways, i was suprised someone wasnt killed.
ill also tell you something else... when it comes to an employer keeping and fireing someone, the big stinking difference is there is seniority in the union, where a layoff is done by asking for voulenteers, and then if more are needed it goes low man on the pole, no matter how hard one works. IN THE REAL WORLD>>> your employer will keep you if you are a hard worker and not a f*** up, show up on time, and actually WORK! he will lay off the slacker, non productive worker before getting rid of the hard worker, no matter if the guy was there 5 months, or 5 years. why keep a broken part on a machine, when you can have one that actually works? its like keeping a car that doesnt run, just for the looks...
so go tell someone else how great the unions are, me, i know better, i been there done that, and you aint fooling nobody but yourself and idiots.
From a Wisconsin teachers blog site:
" On 2/12/11, pfan wrote:
> Wisconsin is facing some harsh times. Take home pay of
> teachers will go down over 10%, yikes!
>
I agree this is bad for state employees and private work
force should have to go through the same things to keep it
fair and to help out. But please do not get the kids going
to protest with the teachers. Those kids just made a fool of
themselves and the teachers at this rally. Those kids had no
idea what they were doing or why they were there. Only that
their teachers brought them there. That makes the teachers
look bad and they should be ashamed. That one kid didnt
even know who the governor was."
http://teachers.net/states/wi/topic381/2.16.11.15.05.58.html
http://teachers.net/states/wi/topic381/2.14.11.12.30.39.html
Now you might start to know how it feels for the rest of America that will have their "take home pay" reduced by more than 10% when ObamaCare kicks in.....only we get to be fined or worse for not complying....only in your case the Majority of Voters in Wisconsin voted these people into office just this past November to do exactly this, what they campaigned on......so the majority of Wisconsin is not behind the teachers union.
The Unions were big backers of ObamaCare, because they think it didn't apply to them....just non-union folks.
Citizen K.,
Well Said! the Republitards screamed like the little B**ches they are, even though they almost put us all into a depression. We don't have to shut up, because we are in America-we all have a voice!
Before anyone goes on bashing Unions, give up your 40hr work week, your weekends off, put your 9 year old brats to work, and forget any paid time off!
Stop fighting each other and realize that is what the Pols want-it is only a distraction so they can lower our wages, lower our standard of living, and their corporations can make more money! You really want to get paid like you live in Mexico or India?
Zap
independent = a liberal who is afraid to admit it
Robert Karp - So you are increasing your income using whose labor?
Megalodon
nice case history...but of course in the libbie world all they read was "blah, blah, blah...blah blah"
thanks for sharing your experiences
Critical Thinker (Maine)
Since you spammed this - I'm answering.
NO they are not blaming workers. They are attempting to correct poor management by previous administrations and trying to prevent out of control benefits from spiraling out of control again - There is a huge difference. If they don't do something there will be no state left.
Banks didn't cause the collapse -
Here I'll agree - Politicians are the biggest reason for the gas price. Their you can drill here and not there policies, industry you use this additive hear and that additive that create shortages that producers and speculators take advantage of.
Bernie Madoff did not cause the collapse. The amount of money he swindled is nothing compared to what goes in and out of investments each day and no politican sanctions this type of ponzi scheme - but they do sanction a couple of ponzi schemes. The real collapse occured when foreign investors realized they were going to lose billions on Citi, BoA, and others bad mortgages. Let's just say when they cashed in $500 Billion in Treasuries in 2 hours - that got the governments attention - and forced the government to "make good" on the bad mortgages - or suffer the collapse of the entire financial system and government to boot.

Strength, courage and power to my brothers and sisters in Wisconsin .... and all union workers for standing your ground!
Don't even go at public workers pensions and health care plans after public workers / public servants average 3-5% pay increases over more than a decade.
You all want to play the 'class & caste' game? Check on the wages of your state administrations...what are they willing to give up---that goes for the Governor of WI and all other state governors.
Better yet, check out the corporate crooked 'suits' in the banking system and Wall Street and go after them! If you want to put it to your educators, firemen, and policemen, think again when you need their services!
fireman and firewomen and policemen and policewomen are exempt...nice try with the diatribe and babble but "fail"
Noelle
only 49% of blacks are graduating in Wisconsin (according to their own statistics)...where are your so-called "educators"? , doesn't sound like anyone "needs" those union crime syndicate "educators" as they aren't getting the job done...sounds like the teachers union crime syndicate is playing the "class & caste" game...wake up and smell what you are shoveling
only 49% of blacks are graduating...white students are graduating at about 82%...looks like the teachers union crime syndicate are the ones playing the "class & caste" game
People had better wake up and stand up or freedom and a decent standard of living in this country will be only a fading memory. Corporations and the people who serve their interests whether the Republican governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker or Barack Obama a Democrat will never give you or defend either unless the public forces them to. I'm glad the people in Wisconsin are fighting back but the Democrats, after making a show of resisting while the cameras are on them, will probably stab the protesters in the back unless people make it known in the clearest terms that they won't stand for it, at the ballot box or in the streets:
Unite workers and youth to defeat Wisconsin budget cuts
16 February 2011
...The governor's demand for sweeping wage and benefit cuts and the outlawing of strikes is not only an assault on the state's 175,000 public sector workers. It is an assault on the entire working class and is the first step in the financial aristocracy's campaign to destroy public education, health care and other services that millions depend on.
Demonstrating his contempt for public sentiment, the governor has threatened to dispatch the National Guard to ram through his demands.
Walker's attacks on democratic rights and social spending are not unique to Wisconsin or to the Republican Party.
Instead, they are part and parcel of an orchestrated attack on working class living standards being carried out by both big business parties, led above all by the Obama administration. While handing over trillions to bail out Wall Street, provide tax breaks for the rich and finance its criminal wars, the White House has refused to help the states, which have a combined deficit of $126 billion. The budget shortfall is being seized upon as a pretext to lay waste to any form of government spending that does not boost the fortunes of the rich, the banks, and the corporations...
....Walker's attacks on democratic rights and social spending are not unique to Wisconsin or to the Republican Party.
Instead, they are part and parcel of an orchestrated attack on working class living standards being carried out by both big business parties, led above all by the Obama administration. While handing over trillions to bail out Wall Street, provide tax breaks for the rich and finance its criminal wars, the White House has refused to help the states, which have a combined deficit of $126 billion. The budget shortfall is being seized upon as a pretext to lay waste to any form of government spending that does not boost the fortunes of the rich, the banks, and the corporations.
Across the border in Illinois, the Democratic-controlled state legislature is moving toward banning the right of public school teachers to strike in order to carry forward a massive assault on public education. In Ohio, a Republican governor is working hand-in-hand with Democratic mayors to bar public employee strikes. Democratic governors in New York and California are ordering unprecedented budget cuts, just like their Republican counterparts in states such as Florida and Arizona.
At the national level, Obama has imposed a de facto pay cut on federal workers and a five-year spending freeze on all non-military items. The budget-cutter-in-chief on Monday proposed savage cuts to virtually every form of social spending, including a 50 percent cut to the already miniscule aid given to the poor and elderly so they can heat their homes in the winter.
While doing everything to boost corporate profits and the stock market, the administration has done nothing to alleviate any aspect of the social crisis—mass unemployment, the foreclosure crisis, homelessness, hunger, spiraling tuition costs....
... The claim that "tough choices" are necessary because there is not enough money is a shameless lie. The main problem facing American workers is the obscene levels of wealth monopolized by the financial aristocracy, abetted by the entire political establishment....
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/feb2011/wist-f16.shtml
Hey, liberals I am gloating over this. :)
Fact: Wisconsin's was projected by their own accounting to have an overall budget surplus of one hundred and twenty million in 2012 (amazing considering the state of the economy Nation wide). Interesting that the Republican Governor pissed it all away in tax breaks for his corporate cronies (this was his first order of business after taking office). These tax breaks for the rich, multinationals and corporations totaled one hundred and thirty million (do the math). More importantly eliminating the American right of collective bargaining for Federal and state employees will effectively destroy and eliminate the Democratic Party's number one source of Champaign donations in any given year. This is not fiscal conservatism... this is politics! FOX News is lying on behalf of Corporate America!
Arch Stanton thumbs up to you. Public employees, unions or workers did not create the budget crisis. Bad policy decisions and rampant greed did. Unions did not cause outsourcing corporate greed did and continues still today. Corporations consistently relocate to where labor is dirt cheap and workers don't receive benefits. How could you put a roof over your head, feed your family with those wages? All workers including public employees support state and local economies. How important is a child's education, fire and police protection, or any other public service to you? Who would you attract to become teachers, firemen or policemen with those terms? Do you understand and realize the working conditions of each, the requirements, demands, and skills required? Could you do what each does for what you want to compensate them for? We get what we pay for. I'm sure the average person could find all sorts of areas to cut creating savings. However, if you think for one moment this will create measurable savings try again. Shame on anyone who thinks this is about public employee compensation. This bill is about all workers rights regardless of your career path.
what makes even more sence...hanging out in front of job center in milwaukee and throwing things at the employee's coming and going because they wont join the mass od retards. i took in a load of scrap today for gas to go to a jobfair in oshkosh, might go to milw instead, and protest against the protesters. not even sure i want to work for oshkosh truck anymore if this is the way the union for gov contracts is going to act, ill keep looking
Megalodon, did you mean you work for a state contracted union truck company? You called the protestors "retards," while you took a "load of scrap for gas to go a job fair?" Agreed, protestors should not be throwing things at anyone but I've got to wonder after your comment how you fit in. I wouldn't go so far as to call anyone "retard," just because I don't agree with them. I can recall many times from the past that people not "retards," stood up for what they believed in. Years later they were not considered rebel rousers but rather the voices of and for change. They did exactly what many are doing now protesting against a government policy. For workers all accross this nation this issue is about their rights and future working conditions. If you enjoy exchanging scraps for gas or bartering who am I to judge you or call you names. I'd like to think you can see the bigger picture not just a few overly passionate voices for the future.
there are death panels in AZ too, .
funy how the republicans were screaming "death panels!" in the health-care bill, but it's the republicans that are creating the real "death panels".
whenever the republicans start maki9ng a lot of noise to scare people about "those horrible things the democrats are planning", just look to them to implement the very same thing themselves soon.
the republicans are doing their best to create a financial elitist system that will only allow the rich to be educated, and give the rich total control over the lives of all the little peons of the rest of America
reaganomics and the bush cult are alive and well in america
Just the typical attack on working families courtesy of the GOP, for those of you that are anti union your are entitled to your opinion, but you will be next!
Same crap here in Indiana, every state that has a GOP majority are attacking working families!
INDIANA LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
House Bill 1585: Seeks to permanently ban collective bargaining for state employees, criminalize the encouragement and participation in strikes by public employees and takes away the pensions of those who do. The bill also prohibits even voluntary collection of dues by local and state governments as well as school employers and disproportionately hurts the ability of women and minorities to bargain for better wages and working conditions. It passed out of committee and now moves to the House floor for a vote.
House Bill 1216: Prohibits project labor agreements and renders Indiana’s common construction requirements useless. Specifically the legislation exempts from common construction wage requirements projects under $1 million and all school and university projects. Currently only projects under $150,000 are exempt from this law. Passing this bill would lower the wages of Indiana’s construction workers and open the door to out-of-state workers.
House Bill 1203: An unnecessary bill designed to interfere with worker's ability to designate a union to represent them, if passed the National Labor Relations Board has already pledged to sue the state because the measure is unconstitutional.
House Bill 1538: Bars local units of government from setting a minimum wage higher than a state minimum wage, restricting an important way to put upward pressure on wages.
Senate Bill 273: Like House Bill 1585, this bill seeks to permanently ban collective bargaining for state employees and criminalize the encouragement and participation in strikes by public employees.
Senate Bill 333: Seeks to eliminate the use of all Projects Labor Agreements on publicly funded construction projects.
Senate Bill 575: Limits collective bargaining rights of Indiana’s teachers to the point of dismantling them. If passed, only wages and certain fringe benefits may be bargained. This bill eliminates bargaining of hours and days, opening the door to extremely long hours and a longer work week with no additional compensation.
Senate Bill 001: Allows for outside agencies to be used to evaluate teachers and for teachers to evaluate other teachers. Teachers will not have input into the evaluation tool. The State Board of Education will have to approve the tool chosen by a school corporation, limiting local control. There is no appeal process under this bill if a teacher is fired unjustly. The Superintendent of Public Instruction may revoke a teacher’s license at will.
House Bill 1002: Allows for charters to be established by mayors of 2nd class cities or a majority vote of a school board. The bill allows for acquisition of under-utilized buildings for $1 per year for up to 20 years. The school corporation must maintain the building. Charters have first option at any under-utilized building, meaning the corporation cannot choose to sell it if a charter wants the building. It also requires that only 50 percent of the teachers in a charters need to be licensed.
House Bill 1003: Creates vouchers to allow public money to be diverted to private schools. If passed public schools are estimated to lose $110 million.
mgbirish
I know! Isn't it great?!
Seriously, if you've ever spent any time in Madison you would know that this needed to be done. They have city bus drivers making over $100K a year. Not trashing the profession of driving a bus but it's not, as they say, rocket surgery.
"Rocket surgery"?
Brains sergery + rocket science. Get it! :<)
Yeah, I get it...
Its called sarcasm!
So Madison bus drivers make $100K/year? Now is that actual salary or is it salary+benefits?
There is a distinction between the two. Why is it that the public says that it's alright for the market to pay CEO's six and seven figure salaries but the person who works in the service sector has to take a pay cut?
Those of you who are against union's, keep it up. Your non-union job/salary/pensions will be the next to go. Soon some computer, robot, or younger person will replace you. Let's see how you live then once your SS has been cut, not Medicare or Medicaid, and your 401K tanks because Wall Street has decided it's easier to make money by driving down the cost of your portfolio.
Wake UP America. It's not too late to stop this madness.
Yes, it is an uneducated sarcasm....
.
sayitain't so,
what SS? They can't cut something they were never intending to give me in the first place.
Doesn't matter if it is salary plus benefits, it is still the cost to the tax payer....
Seriously! The first thing this corporate shill (Governor) did in office was give large corporations massive tax breaks. Why does this all sound familiar! According to several independent sources what had been essentially budget "neutrality" become a short fall!!! Guess who is making up the difference - working Americans. But that isn't the only reason why you will see this trend going Nation wide - the Republican's are going after the collective bargaining of "all" state and federal workers because they have traditionally supported the Democratic Party. This is POLITICS
dressed up as fiscal austerity (Carl Rove said as much - the only honest thing he has ever said)! Corporations will in the end be the only entities that benefit from Citizens United and armies of lobbyists. Wake up people - they will privatize everything including the police and the fire department. Your house will burn if you missed a payment and Black Water will be the local constabulary. You think I'm joking - when it is all done and said America will have the look and feel of a some science fiction movie where morally bankrupt and yes overtly evil corporations are the government and run everything! Oh, and they will throw the best of the 19th century into the mix for good measure - debtors prison, work houses, cities suffocating in pollution (see London Fog). Our economy was tanked by Republican deregulation and Corporate greed and now there using the outcome as a pretext for going after American workers and every aspect of a once great and progressive society!
mn-1062959...wrong. The cost of health insurance is out of the control of the employee or employer. If you spent as much time bitching about the consistent 7-8% increases in the costs of health care every year that you spend on the 1-2% increase in salaries, you would have more credibility.
Brilliant, brilliant, BRILLIANT... Precipitate the greatest recession in American History through deregulation. Fight a preemptive war (Daddy's war) without raising taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Give tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires and think the jobs are going to fall mana from heaven (didn't happen). Give tax breaks to corporations to send jobs overseas (sounds like treason to me.) Now wrap it all up in the American flag, show an American Eagle (do you hear the screech) and the best photo op of all history (Bush standing on top of the ruble of 9/11). And after all this you blame the tanked economy on working Americans! Brilliant!
SayitaintSo,
Luddite
fredfromsj,
Your just pissed cause you didn't post it. Sour grapes!
Sorry DJ it is still the cost to the tax payer.
Yeah Tank, read part of it the first time you posted the same drivle and you should be happy they are offering tax incentives to companies...He's trying to get companies in Illinois an added reason to move to Wisconsin after Illinois raised all their taxes....More jobs for Wisconsinonians.....
Wow I live in Wisconsin and thought what we were fighting was bad. This is much worse. Best of luck to fighting this in Indiana.
Yes mike there are a lot of companies that run to low tax states to get their cheep labor from union busting governments. On the other hand there are companies who go to states where there is a stable tax base, where the workers are happy and the roads are fixed. Depends which kind of world you want to live in I guess.
And if you think GOP attacks on the working class family are great, you haven't seen anything yet. I'm sure you'll be happy when this new congress strips out everything from the budget and the job market tanks and more people will be out on the streets with no safety net. As long as you get yours.
Sven- I did a little research. It didn't take long to find an article that confirmed your Madison bus driver story...to a point.
What you failed to mention was that one of the chief reasons that Madison has bus drivers making over $100K is because they have a shortage of drivers due to a hiring freeze the city instituted last year, which resulted in excessive OT. Yes, the Teamster contract needs to be renegotiated, but that doesn't justify your misrepresentation of the facts.
Byl -
As long as you get yours?
Are you kidding me? Those of us in the private sector aren't getting ours - we've taken the cuts in pay and elimination of benefits. It's those in the public sector that are stomping their feet, giving us the finger. They don't give a crap about us. They don't care if we have to turn over more of OUR tax money so they can retire after 20 years with pensions and insurance.
The governor said if you do this I can avoid lay offs. He wants collective bargaining eliminated for benefits and pensions, NOT PAY. He wants to leave benefits and pension issues up to the voters - you know - the ones that pay for this. He also asked for a 8% increase in employee contribution on benefits. There are many people that would LOVE to have ONLY an 8% increase in their contribution to benefits and health care.
By the way - for all of the democrats who are holier than thou - did you see the signs with the picture of Gov Walker? The ones that show the CROSS-HAIR right between his eyes with the words DON'T RETREAT...RELOAD.
Byl,
I keep hearing this broken record from the Liberal/Progressive Left. Here's something to put in your well used pipe and smoke. What is killing the working class family is the ever increasing taxes to pay for the non-producing parasitic state and local union workers. You think the real working class families in the private sector wouldn't love to have some of their hard earned money made from actually producing something of value back? I think if you take a poll a majority of Wisconsin "working class" residents would be in favor of this.
Dismantle the common sense regulations created at the end of the Great Depression. Give tax breaks to corporations to send their manufacturing and jobs overseas. Fight Daddy's War and not raise taxes to pay for it (first time in American history). Precipitate the greatest recession in American History (then blame on the Democrats and home owners). Extend tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires in an economic downturn (lie about it creating jobs) and then BLAME THE VICTIMS. This is not about fiscal conservatism - this is all about politics. Republican want to destroy the right of collective bargaining so only corporations can benefit from Citizens United. BRILLIANT!!!
becsmom,
Sorry, the story I read was from over 5 years ago at least. Must still be going on. They must make excuses every year.
Used to be in union, made good money, too much money for what I was doing, union tried to screw company, company screwed back, closed plant, now make no money.
Unions suck.
Sven: The Teamsters Union may be part of the problem, but the OT was also a problem 5 years ago. The city didn't want to hire new drivers because they felt the pay rate negotiated by the Teamsters was too high. By refusing to hire new workers, who would receive lower pay because of their lower seniority, they insured that the overtime that would be necessary to keep the buses running would be provided by the highest paid workers, since OT is made available based on seniority. That's what is known as cutting off your nose to spite your face. If the city would negotiate early retirement for some of the highest paid workers, and renegotiate the starting pay based on the current economy and the ready availability of workers willing to work at lower rates, it would be a win-win--more jobs, more employed people, less overtime. The problem is that the Republicans are so focussed on destroying the unions that they refuse to use logic.
McG
we are glad Indiana is getting on board with ridding our nation of the government union crime syndicate ...it is a pox on the nation...thanks for pointing out some of the better stuff going on in our great nation
I worked as a union carpenter for about 30 years, some of that time I worked on a few non-union jobs. The union jobs were much better managed, had much safer working conditions, better tools and a better trained crew. On non-union jobs some days you took your life in your hands going to work.
I am married and have four daughters. My wife is a teacher, three of my daughters are teachers. They all have B. A. degrees, one has a masters, one will start a masters program this summer. They love teaching, and none of them went into it for the money.
This whole WI debacle is not about anything other than union busting. Once the unions aren't able to protect the workers rights, the corporations will destroy the American work force. How many jobs have been outsourced. The thing is, you pay $50 for an item made in America, the job is outsourced and made way cheaper, but you still pay $50 for the same item. Where do the savings and profits go, back to the corporations. Look at an old Carhartt catalog, then look at a new one. And now the Supreme's have giving the multi-national corporations the right to give boatloads of money to candidates they support, and with the weaken labor unions unable to balance the cash flow of the corporations we end up with a congress bought and paid for by Big Business, Big Oil and the Big Banks. Doom on the American working class. $700 billion for the top 2% of wealthy Americans, no new banking regulations, watered down stock market regulations. And it's all the Presidents fault, good luck America!!!
but barlow, anything good for big business is good forAmerica, the working people should be happy to make $3 an hour. only the rich CEOs and tv and radio mouthpieces (beck, rush, et al) should be permitted to tell people "how they should be happy to be good little slaves"
(sarcasm)
hey Dan...what about the liberal Hollywood "stars" and supposed "comediens" that are getting phat (I think that is what the kid's used to say) rich and running their yaps about your liberal views and agendas?...why are they exempt from your "wrath"?...because they spout the same lockstep "progressive" (communists in America used to call themselves progressives) diatribe and psycobabble that you believe?...just wondering...oh and did you know?:
"Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227)"
OTA, and how many of those Hollywood types are responsible for making the decision to ship American jobs overseas? (none) how many are responsible for the banking and housing debacle that started this depression? (none)
I have nothing against healthy rewards for CEOs that keep Americans employed and keep their company healthy, (doing their job like they're supposed to) but far too many are getting rewarded richly for screwing Americans, even getting huge bonuses when the companys financiials get worse.
how is forcing currently middle-class Americans to work for $3 an hour good for America? (it isn't unless you happen to already be rich)
"Hollywood type"?
the first rock and roll pervert ,eerrr i mean President !
how about our 2nd pervert to be impeached ? (glass Steagall act, selling stolen nuclear secrets)
gee R.L. you seem to have conveniently forgotten who controlled both houses of Congress when Glass Steagal was repealed. you do know that Congress writes the laws? and enough blue dog dems were on board to override any veto.
and Clinton got caught getting a BJ, BFD
oohhh, he lied about it. I couldn't care less about any president's sex life as long as he does the job, but stupid people want to make a big deal out of private, personal matters.
and Bush and Cheney lied about WMDs in Iraq, Which cost more for the taxpayers and in lives lost? (no brainer question there) unless you are another mindless demagogue
And monica had a mouthful of bill ,when the twin towers were attacked the first time ,
Guess the Impeached one ,should have been focused on something more important than............... Elion Gonzalez running around loose !
How about Pres Cigar ,not nabbing Bin laden ? OOpppsss !
BTW ,It's not the BJ ,we knew about those 200 chicky's when der slick meister had state troopres ,picking up prostitutes !
It's about distracting the sheep with a BJ ,while hes selling us out to Wen ho lee....
and Bush did sooo much better,
Bush destroyed the economy, drove up oil from $15 a barrel to $120 cut taxes while blowing a trillion dollars on war, (unheard of in all US history, an unfunded war, what was that about 'fiscal responsibility'?LOL) created the largest, most expensive and most personally intrusive bureaucracy in all of American History "Homeland Insecurity". and you are whining like a complete imbecile about Clinton's sex life.
like I said, "Mindless Demagogues"
Twin towers 1993 ........ USS Cole .....Marines in Africa ....Glass Steagall act,
sandy Wienburger ,and his pants full of stolen nuclear secrets
Barny Frank ,chris dodd
Yep ,i believe "Mindless demagogues" is accurate !
compare the economy of the 8 years of clinton with the 8 years of bush. and get back to me
compare the death toll of Americans between the two periods. compare the increase of national debt for the two periods.
compare the increase in American jobs for the two periods
you lose on all counts.
sorry rlkraft but your golden bot bush is a failure.
you keep going on about clinton and glass steagall. who introduced the bill to repeal?
hint, both were republicans, one was phill gramm, the other was jim leach
who controlled both houses? oh, yeah, republicans.
what is so funny, is that when the republicans controlled both houses, everything bad was clintons fault, when bush and the republicans controlled executive and legislative branches for six years, everything bad was clintons fault, suddenly when the house and senate,fall under the control of democrats, magically the house and senate are rsponsible for everything bad, and not your golden boy bot bush. face it, bush failed, he lied, and he was responsible for far more deaths. and far more jobs lost than clinton ever was
danny
the minimum wage in America is 7.25 an hour...let me know if I need to send you a calculator and instructions on "searching" out that type of info...because I will help out
the only "job increases" are the 200,000 new federal employees...haha
OTA, sorry, I make considerably more than that, and between rent, gas, food, and minimal insurance, there isn't a lot left.
do you really think you could live on 7.25 an hour on your own? I don't know how I could if I only made that much. a 1 bedroom apt in my area is $800 a month. and rents go up when housing falls (in case you weren't aware of that little fact). your 7.25 an hour comes to 1256 a month before taxes. how is anyone going to pay rent, gas, utilities, food, and insurance on that?
yet the brilliant conservatives want to cut that wage down, and say that the rising rents, prices, insurance, etc, are "good for the economy". only good for a few
hmmm...are you sure you make more than 7.25 an hour?
I made less than that at times and survived on my own since I left home at the age of seventeen...never had to move back either
it's hard to tell where the "scared libbie" ends and the "superior elitist" begins....
uuuhhh...Kathy Lee gifford and her sweat shop...
and your queen Peolsi and her power plays
"One of the biggest opponents of the federal minimum wage in Samoa is StarKist Tuna, which owns one of the two packing plants that together employ more than 5,000 Samoans, or nearly 75 percent of the island’s work force. StarKist’s parent company, Del Monte Corp., has headquarters in San Francisco, which is represented by Mrs. Pelosi. The other plant belongs to California-based Chicken of the Sea."
last I checked Hollywood is in Mexifornia ,so i am sure Hollywood losers have been in conversation with Stuplousy
oh, and you said: "how is forcing currently middle-class Americans to work for $3 an hour good for America?"
I said :the minimum wage in America is 7.25 an hour:...what does your last bit of drivel have to do with your comment getting pimp slapped to the ground?...not much really
and how long ago was that?
you have noticed that rent, mortgages, fuel, food, insurance, etc. are a lot more than they were "way back when"
notice that all the things that you actually need to survive (housing, food, fuel) are conveniently excluded from the so-called "inflation rate"?
so pimping is your great success story?
LOL
well we did have 12 years of a Governor ,whose state was 50th in education ,who used state troopers to acquire prostitutes.
Then was able to continue his woman's Rights way's (including harassing witnesses with the IRS) For 8 years and 364 executive orders !
to show us the true meaning of "pimping" and it only cost a couple hundred lives and 75 million dollars !...So far !
kraft, what does that have to do with anything? was that meant for a different post?
good one...up all night I would imagine...keep up the good work, and the libbie babble
There is NO legitimate purpose for "public service" unions
P.S. to President Obama and other democrat "machine" politicians: raping taxpayers and paying off corrupt democrats are NOT "legitimate purposes"
Public Service workers are asked to do more for less pay. And instead of rewarding them with collectively bargained rights, the State has decided to strip them of their rights to score cheap political points. Will is save some money over the next few years? Sure will. But will it come at the expense of people's lives? Sure will. And could this money have been 'found' in other ways? Sure could have been. But why talk about taxes for the richest, when you can just blame Unions?
They were supposed to do more with less pay years ago, now they do less with more pay.
At the expense of peoples lives????? A little melodramatic, don't you think?
Yes, according to liberals there is always money to be found at the expense of the tax base. No amount of spending is too much, particularly when a big portion goes right into democrat coffers.
Tax payers have had it. They voted their wallets and the last polll I saw showed 80% support for what the Governor is doing. The gravy train has been derailed, get over it.
You're right Valhalla - they will get to keep their lives. They just won't have a place to live, or be able to put food on the table, or be able to send their own children to college. But they will be alive, so the misery part doesn't matter I am sure....
Public employees have never been asked to work harder. I've worked in both sectors.
Both sides are missing the point. All this will blow by within a year or two. In the short term, budget will be more balanced but bears little impact on the root of our economic woes - Greed is Good. As long as we continue to value 'me first' philosophy on both ends of the political spectrum, we can expect more bitter fights in the days ahead.
Working for the state is a cush job anyway you look at it. It's a good job. The problems that are seen daily show this to be true. Millions of people would love to have a job working for the state. As a Democrat I agree with this legislation. It's a cut, and a warning. We have all seen the three guys holding up that one shovel making good money and as we drive by we say,"That's just wrong." I see the point... Now fair is fair...
How much could be saved if every state and federal employee took a 10% cut in pay, including all Representatives, senators, gov's, and to include the White House? After all, fair is fair. Let's dig into some of those federal, and state pensions and see what all states and the fed could do with that extra tax payer dollar. I wonder how much money that is, and what could be created from that?
Riiight...
Would that be considered class warfare, socialism, capitolism killing? Are we there yet?
This isn't union busting. This is just the right thing to do. After all you voted for this Gov. and he is doing something. Now let's ask him to cut his own pay by the same to show how dedicated he is and trickle it down through the state to all fed and state employees. Then your state troubles are gone and you have a surplus, and I might vote republican next time.
All the States do this and bada-bing,.... What deficit?????? Private sector.. untouched.
Headlines; Government problem solved by Government. Yea.. riiight.....
InniAudi,
Right on. It is amazing where you can find fat to cut. Phoenix for example spends 1.1 Million dollars a year on a stupid public access station that no one watches, which provides the same info that can be found on the city's website. There are a total of 11 employees who make between $70k - $95k in base salary and they only produce 300 hours of programming per year. Compared to other cities like Tempe who spend only a quarter of that budget and produce twice the amount of programs. Cutting funding or completely eliminating something like this would affect less than 20 people and put over $2M annually back into our city's budget. I wonder what other frivolous or redundant programs we can find?
Meanwhile the gov't is making pay cuts, cutting jobs and raising taxes while making the ridiculous statement that there is nothing else they can do to avoid this.
saying ALL gov't jobs are "cush" is generalizing something that just isn't true. Would you consider $35k/year for a teacher's salary as "cush"?
Five years ago I would say no...
Today I would say yes... especially to a job...
and to those who would say no now... there are millions qualified who would say yes to 35k a year now, so take what is offered and keep your job if you can, or those who are not working will say yes.
and for this I am sorry.
$35,000 is more than I make
"raping taxpayers" is borrowing money from the chineese to give to big oil, farmers, and the rich. my wife teaches in a school district west of chicago and she makes $17 an hour- big whoop. she cant retire in 20 years at 80% - $15 and hour/$600 a week- another lie.
"WE ARE MADDER THAN HELL AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE"
Yes, the public sector gravey train where you get pennies on the dollar that the private sector employee makes. I love how every few years someone gets the idea to run govt jobs more like a business, but they don't give their employees the perks that businesses get. It just means they want to trim the employee's wages or the number of people in the office.
This would seem more genuine if they were looking at the top earners in the US. Instead of trying to fix the broken economy on the backs of the working class. Why is it the rich don't have any skin in this game?
Of course they would. They also think teachers get to retire at age 50 on 80% of their salary with FULL medical benefits. Before some of these people post comments they should do some research! Thank you.
"Public employees have never been asked to work harder. I've worked in both sectors."
So have I. In the past two years of my eight years in a public sector job, working to serve the public in a small rural community, I have seen the demand for our services skyrocket, while positions are being eliminated and those who survive to fight another day are stretched to the max -- also while our benefits are being stripped, and our new GOP governor (thanks to the Koch Brothers), is also blaming public employees and doing his best to bust the unions. I have never worked so hard in my life, and if I didn't truly love public service, I would flee. So, Sweet Baby James, shove it. I will continue to help the people who walk through my door until they close me down, which is actually pretty likely in the next 6 months, and then I will find some way to volunteer my services to my struggling community for free. Because someone has to give a damn about the real people in our communities -- and it ain't the GOP.
What is it you aren't seeing? These people work hard at jobs for 30 years. They are the ones that help YOU find jobs, some of them. When the DETR is closed down, where will you go then? Why do you hate the working people who live in your community, pay taxes AND for the goods and services that keep businesses open? What earthly use is it to destroy your own state and local economies just to make a point about unions?
The last private sector job I held, after 7 years (with no benefits), was called up & told it was my last day, nothing wrong with my work, they were cutting the department out to save money. Just a "business decision." Sweet Baby James -- you're so wrong in so many ways for such a short post.
I've got an idea. What we should do is make being a state worker and entry level job at minimum wage. From there you go into the private sector and start your career. That way we won't have these permanent slugs growing fat and unhealthy while they sit around waiting to retire so they can drink full time.
For those complaining about $35,000, consider that teachers must have a least a bachelor's degree. Couple that with the professional development requirement that teachers must meet. Then add in the cost of initial certification and certification renewal. Next, while teachers don't teach during the summer, consider the number of hours that they work during the school year. Believe me, it is much more than 40 hours per week.
I used to be employed for an oil company as a systems analyst. Therefore, I was a non-union employee. However, the benefits we received, as non-union employees, were made possible the the union employees.
Okay - I have the solution
Let's take all of the assets from the rich. We can split it up between all 50 states and the federal government. We will have eliminated the evil rich and just like the democrats keep telling us everything will then be fine.
until the bills comes due next month, or the month after that, or the month after that.
Teachers don't have job security either. They are getting lay off notices every year. If you are not laid off, consider yourself as having won the lottery. My husband is a high school teacher and I can tell you that you are misinformed if you think his job is cush. Most of you leave your jobs at the office. When he gets home he has phone calls to parents, papers to grade and planning for the upcoming lessons. Not to mention the afterschool activities/ tutoring he oversees. He also takes part of his salary and pays for science labs and general classrooms supplies. The attitude this country has taken towards teachers makes me sick. It is no wonder our children are failing. How do you educate a child when education and educators are not respected in the home? Everyone is so quick to pass the blame on to teachers... look in the mirror parents!
Because I can chose to support the CEO's salary by using his company's products or not. My only option here is to move to a state with no state income taxes and they aren't doing so well at the moment either.
I worked as a union carpenter for about 30 years, some of that time I worked on a few non-union jobs. The union jobs were much better managed, had much safer working conditions, better tools and a better trained crew. On non-union jobs some days you took your life in your hands going to work.
I am married and have four daughters. My wife is a teacher, three of my daughters are teachers. They all have B. A. degrees, one has a masters, one will start a masters program this summer. They love teaching, and none of them went into it for the money.
This whole WI debacle is not about anything other than union busting. Once the unions aren't able to protect the workers rights, the corporations will destroy the American work force. How many jobs have been outsourced. The thing is, you pay $50 for an item made in America, the job is outsourced and made way cheaper, but you still pay $50 for the same item. Where do the savings and profits go, back to the corporations. Look at an old Carhartt catalog, then look at a new one. And now the Supreme's have giving the multi-national corporations the right to give boatloads of money to candidates they support, and with the weaken labor unions unable to balance the cash flow of the corporations we end up with a congress bought and paid for by Big Business, Big Oil and the Big Banks. Doom on the American working class. $700 billion for the top 2% of wealthy Americans, no new banking regulations, watered down stock market regulations. And it's all the Presidents fault, good luck America!!!
I agree with you. My dad, my aunts, my sister, a lot of my family are teachers. It amazes me when I was young what I had to go without because of the teacher's pay. like you said, they have to go to college and $35,000.00 a year is nothing, they have loans to pay back. I listened to the Morning Joe show and all he kept saying is, "the teachers are out of work today, this doesn't look good, they just don't want to pay what the rest of the country is paying for medical benefits." I think he missed it buy a long shot, the teachers recognize they are trying to break the Union and that is the main reason they went on strike. If the governor wants to change the percentage paid by the state workers, approach the unions and discuss what needs to be done. People keep saying that state workers and teachers have easy jobs, wow. I've worked in both and they are both hard, but the ones with a union treats me better, makes things more fair. I understand we have to make sacrifices in this economic time that we are in, but, I find it very odd that you don't ask the CEO's and the rich to do the same. Look at what one bank CEO, whose bank went under and he lied to the people over the pension funds, saying everything is ok, but he really knew it wasn't. The bank fell and he escaped with $529,000,000.00 US dollars. The republicans are looking out for their pay day and their family, but truly no one else. Teachers don't make enough to effect any state economy, if any of you think and that it is an easy job become a teacher. How many teachers could be paid with that CEO's money he blackmailed the people out of? How many oil companies, bankers, and Wall Street people are backing the republicans. Maybe that's why we go after the poorest first and a lot of people who don't know just say the same thing that their leaders say. You know how much taxes some of these companies pay? zero. We could easily fix this problem but the republicans don't want to touch the rich's money, all we have to do is have a flat rate tax and in a few years you will see the deficit go away. But, everybody would have to pay it and every coporation would also. I don't want to work for a CEO, when the company is about to go out of business they turn and lie, get close to a billion dollars, already making millions a year, and walks out without paying any of the hard working employees. This is what happens when you don't have a Union. From what I am hearing a lot of you say is, when you don't have a Union you are worked like slaves and paid pennies on the dollar for some one at the top who probably makes millions already, by playing golf and flying on jets and is not a professional golfer or pilot. I wonder who helped them get a job, answer, A Teacher. Dealing with some of these kids today, you say teachers have a cush job? Well that's what CEO's and republicans like, so, lets make them teachers, oh, and they don't like government paying for medical benefits, they say anything the government does they do a bad job at, they should give up their medical benefits, state and federal repubs, put that money in a fund and start taking down some of the national debt. I'm for sacrifice for this country, but lets make sure it reaches all the way to the top.
I agree with both posts BUT NOT that it is the POTUS fault. Everyone loves to blame Obama for EVERYTHING. He cannot be held responsible for a governor held bent on UNION BUSTING.And you can thank the GOP, the TP and the Koch brothers for that!!! Thank you.
of course ,after 4 years of PROGRESSIVE ,Bush/Cheney ,started the crusades....... Our PROGRESSIVE comrades ,have ALL SORTS of credibility ,when it comes to the blame game !
Hopefully Wisconsin is the first of many states. My husband is in the union (forced) and I am not. We both know how it works - the union is nothing but legalized mafia and it is destroying our cities and towns. There was a time and place for the union, but it's time is long over!
There was a time and place for middle class prosperity and workers not being treated as slaves, but its time is long over!
Fixed. Stop breaking it.
Yeah, well when your corporate masters decide that you need to work 60 hours a week not 40 and for minimum wage without benefits, who the hell is going to help you fight their profit over people mentality. I sure won't because you are asking for it.
Yeah, well when your corporate masters decide that you need to work 60 hours a week not 40 and for minimum wage without benefits, who the hell is going to help you fight their profit over people mentality. I sure won't because you are asking for it.
Fyi, there are already laws against that. Any more than 40 hours/week to non-exempt employees is required to be paid time and 1/2 by federal law.
I've worked for corporations all my life. Thanks to them and judicious personal economic decisions, I was able to retire comfortably at 55. On the other hand I have gotten nothing but $hit from unions.
I have worked 60, 70 sometimes 80 hours a week. It's initiative like that that always kept me employed and able to retire at 55. If you think they are making so much money buy their stock. Participate in their success.
Only 7% of the workforce is unionized, yet they are the source of all trouble. Anybody who has had to deal with them loathes them.
You beat me to it, FMC....this is just the beginning of Big Business improving its chokehold on American workers. First came the extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and increases in corporate tax breaks. Then comes the slow but sure elimination of unionized labor, making it impossible for the lowly employee to fight unfair labor practices. Soon, the deregulation of corporations will begin, letting them loose upon the working class and pretty much saying to them "the government says we can pretty much make you do anything we want, at any pay grade we choose, for as long a week as we want you to work, and you have squat to say about it!! HAR-HAR-HARRRR!!"
The cons will tell you that if you don't like it, go work elsewhere! But, with every business, from Wal-Mart to Joe's Burger's on the corner, doing the exact same thing of abusive business practices, where do you think we'll be able to work? Just another way the middle class, as we know it, will be eliminated by the wealthy. They don't even have a clue that it's the middle class that makes them wealthy in the first place, and that its elimination would be shooting the goose that laid the golden egg.
Thats easy... I will be fighting for myself and looking for another job in my field. Since I am not a burger flipper or customer service person at the local walmart.. I have skills that are in high demand ( even in this economy ) and can go elsewhere.
ANDROLOMA and FastMovingCloud
Unions did this to themselves. They were all for "Wage Hike or Strike" in the good times, but when times got tough did they learn any lessons? Did they say "Maybe we should give some of this back to protect our jobs?" The answer is no, they just continued to say "Wage Hike or Strike". The same thing is still happening at GM. Now that it looks like the company has a chance of survival (Bankruptcy, Bond Defaults, and the American Taxpayer being saddled with their pension responsibilities), the unions are saying again that "we want to get back anything we gave away from 2005 to the present and More because we deserve it." If they do that, then the company will be bankrupt again in 5 years. But that's OK, the company will get another bailout because "they are too big to fail."
If you want to share in the profits, you have to share in the pain too. But, the unions have never been willing to do that. But then you turn around and whine about why there isn't any manufacturing left in the US because no one can afford to hire you to do a job and turn a profit with all of the rules in your contract. You can't have it both ways; pick one or try compromising a little.
STLMIke
FYI, If our current Republican legislature has their way, the laws to which you refer will also be a thing of the past. Yes, we have a Democratic Majority in the Senate to put the breaks on that but for how long?
Look at the big picture. They will continue to whittle away at workers rights until there are none.
We are at war and the enemy lives among us. The rich are attempting to lower our standard of living to better compete with countries like Chine, where people work 12 hour days, six days per week and live in 600 sq. ft. concrete apartments costing several million dollars.
The people who are doing this are nothing more than paid prostitutes to human garbage and criminals. They hide behind the title conservative or republican.
When that needed ambulance or fire truck takes a few minutes longer to get to you, remember why. As our population grows, so does the need for government to grow. What stands between you and the large multi-billion dollar corporation that just raped you of your retirement and career? Only a democraticly run government.
Throw these people out of office and start taking responsibility for our government and how it's run. Do it now before it's too late.
Well said.
STLMIke:
[Fyi, there are already laws against that. Any more than 40 hours/week to non-exempt employees is required to be paid time and 1/2 by federal law.]
That may very well be true, but if you are a SALARIED EMPLOYEE, you better damned well be prepared to work that 60 hour week.
And this is the very reason how companies are going to get around that little pesky federal law regarding "time and a half after 40 hours" dealie.
Wisconsin is making a HUGE mistake, and those that are all orgasmic about this labor setback are going to get a dose of reality. You're jumping on the bandwagon and you don't realize there is no driver.
People in China can afford several million dollar concrete apartments?
the benefits and wages that workers enjoy come from negotiated contracts...unions are needed to give workers a voice....health benefits....working conditions....wages are all negotiated...do you really think that if there were no unions that workers would have the life that they have....
we would go back to the slave wages of the past...and working conditions would sorely suffer..
Many of the so-called cuts by the Republicans show their anti-worker stance...starting with Boehner...declaring that if govenment workers lose their jobs so be it...
why is the republican party waging war against workers and workers rights...
Check the benefits of those non-Union workers who work in the same profession as your husband. Just go check ALL the benefits. You'll see that your husband, who is forced to enjoy more being "forced union ", then what he will get being non-union.
Understandable if he just wants to be the 'yes boss' to management when he is told to go clean the toilet when his profession is machinist.
Amen to that. The Unions are a large reason why the country is in the lousy shape it is currently in. Consistently lobbying for more and more when times dictated that the status quo could not be sustained. It comes down to a matter of survival for companies, governments and the like. The options are reduce salary and benefits, or lose a job entirely. These are tough choices that the whole country will soon be making, wisconsin is just on the cutting edge. Now if NY and California would follow suit, debt could start to be paid down. But i'm talking about the two biggest Liberal dominated welfare states in the country so i more or less expect a bailout for them. everyone should take a hard look at the austerity measures Greece and Ireland have been forced to implement, it is coming here to roost soon. In a country of Multi-millionaire athletes and movie stars down to Garbage men who make $20 plus an hour, it is just too much to sustain. The country needs to hit the reset button on salaries across the board. The first step in that is getting rid of the corrupt unions. They are too political and too powerful and no pols want to say no to them due to their voting blocs. The unions should read the tea leaves and strike the best deal the can while it is still manageable to get a decent contract.
Remember union or not union all have gained huge from the unions, over time , job saftey, the 8 hour work day, all have happend over many years do to the unions. If the unions go away all wages will go down, and as in every thing that has been happening the middle class will be the one to loose, the gap will get wider the avarage worker will have no more pention and we can all look forward to working till we are 70. Union or non union we need them.
Baloney! Listen to Faux news much? Only 7% is unionized because of the constant attack by RepubliCorp's and their puppet masters, aka the Multi-National Corporapists. You do realize that without Unions fighting for fair wages, affordable benefits and safe work places that non-union counterparts wouldn't have them either? Why is that so hard to comprehend? Why does every other Progressive country in the world have a massive Unionized workforce and they are doing just fine?
Again, these anti-union folks who hate a worker having a contract, do you even realize that EVERY single Exec. of these Corporations have GUARANTEED contracts no matter what state the business is in? They are GUARANTEED their Million$ no matter what...benefits - no worries, retirement...golden parachutes. So let me understand why it's OK for all the Execs to have contracts but the workers who make the business run cannot?
Next is no minimum wage, no benefits, no SS until you're on your death-bed if ever...better be able to work until you're 80!
Yes, there are laws that require overtime pay. There are laws that require employers to pay at least a minimum wage. And there are laws that prohibit child labor.
Who advocated for these laws? Liberals and labor unions, that's who. Now if you take away the unions' right to negotiate, then you basically render them powerless.
Once that happens, you'll see a number of things. You'll see wages go down in this country. You'll see efforts to undo the laws requiring overtime pay, and to undo the laws requiring a minimum wage, and to undo the laws prohibiting child labor. You'll see the middle class disappear, and you'll see a very poor country ruled by a small monied elite.
Be careful what you wish for. We just might get it.
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - BLAME THE VICTIM! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
"This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans)"
What tripe. The Republicans weren't in power in Wisconsin until this last mid-term election. Keep blaming the party that WASN'T in power in Wisconsin as this problem steadily built up. Blame the folks trying to fix the problems the Democrats, and the unions they are beholden to, created in the state of Wisconsin.
The very actions of these public worker unions demonstrate to all taxpayers that these groups have been granted too much power, at the expense of the taxpayer, and that they need to be pulled up short before they bankrupt Wisconsin and numerous other states.
Collective bargaining isn't worth a damn, if the state has no money left to pay the workers with.
Both of my parents were forced-union teachers here in Michigan. They hated it. Yard signs were always given out for the democratic candidate only. It's basically a huge political entity. Heck, if I had a union giving me tenure and top notch health benefits plus pension, I'd be mad to see it go! But really, these unions are keeping bad teachers around. So many just want to go for a free ride on the union express. It has no place in education.
yes, it is despicable that people are forced into unions and made to take the benefits and wage increases that come with it. It is also horrible that unions advocate for the party that is trying to help the working class of this country. Forced yard signs indeed! We should be able to vote for who ever is taking the most rights away from the common man when ever we can!
Your profile pic sucks.
Only 7% of the workforce is unionized, yet they are the source of all trouble. Anybody who has had to deal with them loathes them.
Yes, I'm sure the budget shortfall that state is dealing with is entirely because of the unions. The unions caused the recession and the unions caused the housing bubble, not Wall Street or the banks or loaning money to people who couldn't afford them.
You see the corporations are the real victims here, those fatcat teachers unions really screwed them over.
/sarcasm
What does your husband do? What is his beef? Is he opposed to his union because he doesn't want to pay union dues? If that's it then he is greedy.
Well it seems Wisconsin is not only full of cows, it's also full of REPUBLICAN IDIOTS! Unions back in the 20"s and 30's were run by the mafia, that is not representative of todays unions. They are middle class hard working people, I believe they should share the responsiblity of their insurance and things of that nature but not being able to collectively bargain is COMMUNISM!!!!!!!!! You republican morons and fat cats judge other people from your own stereotyping! I noticed that noone mentioned that your legislators and Govenor get ot keep the insurance they have at no cost to them but to you the taxpayer, they keep giving themselves raises each year! But thats OK with the rightwing front, it's pretty apparent all republicans are the same, a bunch of blind, obedient to the fat cat, lemmings! Lets put this in terms you idiots can understand, your college basketball coach (a state employee) is paid 3x's that of a school teacher in your state! Get your head out of your a****!!!!!!!!
sir kingsley, are you saying that both your parents were bad teachers kept around by the union? And forced? Really? Someone held a gun to their head and FORCED them to be in the union? I like how you people try and claim it's forced. Unless someone held a gun to your head and held you hostage and physically forced you to work as a union employee then no, you were not forced at all. You willingly joined but claim you were forced because you don't want to admit that you ARE what you rail against. And before you start with the "I had join to keep my job" whining, you could have always found another NON UNION job. So, try again hypocrites.
@InniAudi
Typical liberal brainwashing “just make the rich pay more, they can afford it” What the hell ever happened to fairness in this country? The top 20% already pay 80%. Are you really so greedy Inni that you don’t thing the rest of us, the other 80% can chip in just 1/5. Why don’t you brain dead liberals understand that you can only ask so much of the wealthy before they say screw this and move out of the country. Look what happened when NY tried to raise the taxes for the wealthy; half of them had homes in other states already so they just spend 51% of their time there now resulting in a net lose for the state and a larger tax burden on the middle class.
I was the secretary-treasurer of local---U.F.W.A. for 14 years and when the company said they could not compete any more and were folding the union took all monies and everything we had and it went to the international headquarters and that was that total time there was 17 years and this was back in early 80' we learned Unions are only out for their selves and could care less about the people.
@Shellie, if one wants to be a teacher (at least in MI) they must join the union. No choice. You're saying someone should choose a different profession if they don't agree with being forced to join an organization that takes money from their paycheck to donate to political purposes? Just because someone wants to enrich children's lives through education doesn't mean they necessarily want to contribute to the democratic party. The teachers who are in love with the union are the ones who want a free lunch, to sit back and do the bare minimum while enjoying job security and benefits. The GOOD teachers don't care if there is tenure or not, since they know their jobs are secure based on good performance.
Work in non union jobs and work in union jobs. You will see the difference. I did when I got out of the Army. My first job was stocking shelves in a grocery store that was non union. We were expected to work our hours, have a slip if we had to call in due to illness, and expected to produce (in this situation you had to stock 50 cases of product an hour) or you were fired. I made $8.50 an hour and had the ability to buy health insurance and invest into their retirement fund. I left there and then went to work in a local UFWA store. I made $9.00 an hour (it actually was about $7.50 an hour after dues each week). Watched as people weren't actually required to work but got paid for it anyways. Watched the union protect the people that didn't work, and watched them tell me I have to vote democrat. Last I knew it was against the law for someone to tell someone else how they HAVE to vote. Not for the unions.
Unions started off great then they decided that money was more important then making sure the business succeeds so their workers have a place to make money. I am all for this Governor to go through and smack around the public unions a tad with this. The heads of the unions are just as corrupt as the heads of the corporations and banks that people like to scream and yell about.
Well said fact of the matter.
Taking care of this 7% union employees will be as helpful as cutting out 1% in earmarks. Talk about no aim and high precision.
If you support the union or not what does it matter in this case.
The bottom line is we pay these elected officials to go to work and work on the problems facing America. We don't pay them to not show up for a vote and call it a "protest". Take your lazy and apparently elected for no good reason butt to work and vote like you are elected to do.
Wisconsin please take note of the people who did not show up and make sure they never work in the public sector ever again.
BobB
I had a similar experience. The only difference is the company I worked for was non-union. We made good money had profit sharing at the end of the year, and a great client base.
We were then forced into a union "if" we wanted to keep our jobs. Nobody wanted it but the union made it so our boss would have to close the business if we didn't. Didn't take long before we had to raise our prices because the business could not run as efficiently as a result of the bloated contract the union brought with it.
We all made less money every single one of us. On top of it we had to charge our clients 30% more for the same service we provided before. Needless to say the business eventually failed. The union will always be happier seeing a business fail instead of being non union. The union is actually not very interested in keeping people working they are interested in getting Democrats elected.
Tough question.
I've worked both sides, after 9/11 crushed my company, I took a (non-union) government job, and it was pretty good, as long as you didn't mind three levels of bureaucratic ass to kiss and a cast-iron management ceiling only the 'Good Old Boys' got 'selected' into, ...how it that different from Corporate?
Then the union basically just forced our agency to join the PERS, and siht flew everywhere, they were just stealing our dues, and screwing low-seniority's out of COLAs as their 'concessions' to budget cut efforts. It got so siloed up, that nothing was getting done! 95% of capital building funds were 'studied' over into operating side, to allow the GOBs massive overtime pay, until nobody would let go their little turf. It just got nasty.
I leapfrogged from there to above the glass-ceiling in Corporate, enjoying total freedom and signing authority (and 100 hour weeks on salary) but had a car, a phone, perks and even cute secretary-receptionists (sorry). The only flaw with that 'paradise' was 2008, the ownership waited only 30 days to sihtcan the office down to the accountants and water coolers, no prisoners.
So that sucked. Have been working graveyard 3rd-tier sub-contractor jobs on a 'take it or leave it', on-call, no salary, no benefits, no healthcare and no pension, at a wage I was making (and I checked) 25 years ago! And they are holding $5 of that back as a 'year end bonus'. Well, then it's NOT A BONUS!
Face it, ...all out LOOTING by Mercenaries and Usurists literally TRILLIONS a year from Defense and Wall Street and Fed is bleeding out our country, and we are just rearranging the Chinese deck chairs to play 1000 points of light shuffleboard for lifeboat seats, by fighting between union and 'right to work'.
If you can lock in either enough savings or a guaranteed pension and retire, instead of working until you fall over, well then, good for you, salary man or wage worker, union drone Mil.Gov, or on-commission Corporate High-Flyer.
Nobody gets out of life alive, at least we should be allowed to live some of it, I mean, Juno Hilo Charlie, even livestock have housing, food and healthcare!
Poor Woman! Once the Unions are gone you will have only Walmart like conditions, low wages, poor benefits and companies that run only their profits. We need unions more than ever because Capitalism has not worked as we all have experienced. The uncontrolled corporations and bank with their billions that they can throw at the legislature will put this country back and I sometimes think they would even let children work again in mines. The Enrons, Worldcom, BP have shown us that they are criminal entities shifting their money to China if they want and give the stick to the workers. Life is not cheap in this country and those Republicans should be stripped of their state benefits which the so decry.
Britaboo, I appreciate your honesty and forthrightness, and I agree with you. Unions today are just more mafia to deal with.
Dear Joachim, though your name sounds Jewish, I'd say by your comments that you are not. "...because Capitalism has not worked as we all have experienced." Are you nuts? Are you a brainless lunatic? It's capitalism that propelled this country economically above the rest. Was it communism? Did you just get off the boat?!
Your comments are so daft that there is no possible way that you have ever read a single history book or studied anything in school. Did you even graduate from high school?
Then you said, "Republicans should be stripped of their state benefits which the so decry." Hello? Do you know anything about the lower socio-economic strata in this country? You think they're Republicans??!!! You don't know spit. They are predominantly Democrats!!!
"...and companies that run only their profits." What exactly does THAT mean? If you're trying to condemn companies for making a profit and being concerned about that, then here is anothe example that something is wrong with your upstairs. The only reason to do business is to make a profit. Do you think people start businesses and work their butts off just for the fun of it? Just because they need something to keep them busy?
You are kooky.
Unions are a big part of the reason GM failed and was restructured. Government assistance was needed to persuade the UAW to finally restructure it's contract.
I have lived in Detroit forever. Family members worked in both management and the union. The family member that worked in the union was the one who always referred to it as legalized extortion. You were expected to vote they way you were instructed on everything.
Union members for the big 3 never had a problem collecting five to ten thousand dollar bonuses in the late 90's when business was booming. Money given to them by the companies not the union. They demanded raises even when the company was losing money. And if they didn't agree it was going to cost them even more money now because we are going to strike.
Now most Union members would tell you who cares they owe me I work everyday. True but so did my other family member at GM who was not in the union. My union relative realized that the big 3 had a lot more employees than just it's union members and they had those employees to worry about to. Both of them predicted what happened long before it did. They both knew the companies were not cost effective anymore.
Honestly don't feel sorry for anyone who worked for the big 3. Union or not they both made a lot of money. Too much money that coupled with greed on both sides of the fence and you see why they fell behind foreign companies.
Boy I had to scroll down a hundred comments, however I now have the floor - if it wasn't for the unions you're children will be on the floors of child labor, if it wasn't for the unions you would not have a forty work week and a break for lunch, if it was not for the unions you would not have a voice in arbritation - on how you are are being treated - I was an Union representative when 3M denied me the right to become with a college degree to be part of their elite guys net work
OK if we destroy the middle class we destroy the fiber of America - is that what you want?
Do you truly want to become a third world America? Think about it - what is happening in Wisconsin is the fight for middle America, your neighbors, your neighbors children do you want Egypt, and all those countries or do you want America - answer this question - what do you want America to look like - a land of opportunity or one owned by the Koch Brothers?
Barbara,
Those points are vary valid. There was a purpose for unions at one time. Those days are long gone. Unions have turned into a safe haven for corruption and lethargy.
How is an organization that can be taken over by the mafia and exploits it's own union members and the company they work for good for anyone?
How is an organization that fights to pay their worst worker that nobody wants to work with, as much as the most productive worker? It kills the idea of working hard to get ahead. That is why I say it promotes a lethargic mentality.
How is an organization that doesn't do anything to promote business good? They promote the idea of shutting a business down if they don't comply with demands. They don't go out and look for work for the companies that employ their members. They go out after all the work is done and put up a dumb sign that says "Brought to you by your local UAW" That same sign is responsible for the higher cost of completing that project as opposed to a non union company with happier workers who take more of their check home.
I truly don't think it would make America a third world nation. I actually believe it would open the door for more productive workers who want to work and not deal with union. A huge majority of our population want nothing to do with unions.
Are you sick of high paid teachers? Teachers’ hefty salaries are driving up taxes, and they only work 9 or 10 months a year! It’s time we put things in perspective and pay them for what they do - baby sit (or all you think we do)! We can get that for less than minimum wage.
That’s right. Let’s give them $3.00 an hour and only the hours they worked; not any of that silly planning time, or any time they spend before or after school. That would be $19.50 a day (7:45 to 3:00 PM with 45 min. off for lunch and plan — that equals 6 1/2 hours).
Each parent should pay $19.50 a day for these teachers to baby-sit their children.
Now how many do they teach in day…maybe 30? So that’s $19.50 x 30 = $585.00 a day. However, remember they only work 180 days a year!!! I am not going to pay them for any vacations.
LET’S SEE…. That’s $585 X 180= $105,300 peryear. (Hold on! My calculator needs new batteries).
What about those special education teachers and the ones with Master’s degrees? Well, we could pay them minimum wage ($7.75), and just to be fair, round it off to $8.00 an hour. That would be $8 X 6 1/2 hours X 30 children
X 180 days = $280,800 per year.
Wait a minute — there’s something wrong here! There sure is!
The average teacher’s salary (nation wide) is $50,000. $50,000/180 days = $277.77/per day/30 students=$9.25/6.5 hours = $1.42 per hour per student–a very inexpensive baby-sitter and they even EDUCATE your kids!)
WHAT A DEAL!!!!
It sure does put things into perspective…What you think?
Oh that is funny I thought about breaking it down the way you just did.
I would rather have a system like you mention. Where I choose where my children go to school and pay for it. Not having to pay for it through my property tax would be great. Oh yeah private schools, but I still get to pay for it in my taxes. I am not against teachers I am against the union and the system that skims so much tax payer money it is ridiculous.
Even paying for it through taxes was nice back before school of choice. The public school system ran based on where parents decided to spend their money. Now you can live in a city pay hardly any taxes for education and send your kids to another district.
I know several teachers who wish they did not have to be in a union. I also know teachers who do make over $100,000 a year but they are in the private sector where there are way less middle men taking money out of teachers pockets.
So the teachers from several schools decided that they were't going to go teach, but go bitch about their rights to have a union? So what do they need a union for? Well i'll tell you what they need a union for. When the teacher doesn't have enough money for a bigger house they STRIKE for more money. When the teacher doesn't have enough money to pay for two car payments, they STRIKE. When a teacher doesn't have enough money to go on a carribean cruise liner, they STRIKE. When a teacher gets caught slapping a kid around, and then gets fired for it, the UNION steps in to get that teachers job back or force the school to pay millions in restitution.
Unions have gotten out of hand for the last 40 so odd years, to the point that they are run by criminal orginizations. The only reason people complain that they don't have enough money to spend that are part of unions, is because they give all their damn money to the unions. All they have to do is quit those unions and stop paying them, and then they will have more money to spend.
Still, that's how the car dealerships in Detroit fell apart. The line workers kept striking and kept demanding more and more and more, until there was no more to give. And then bankruptcy. And that my friends was a joy to watch. All those car manufacturers saying, guess what, can't pay you no more and can't afford to stay in business, so we're going to fire some of you. And what did the workers do? They decided to go to their union, union said strike, and that's what the workers did. Said, your not going to fire anyone, either you keep everyone, or we don't go back to work....
...and you wonder why people lost jobs in the manufacturing arena, and the education arena? Bunch of idiots and fools. Being part of a Union does not mean you get more rights. Means your on the fast track to losing your job, and earning any sort of money...and ever getting a job in another business. Especially when that other job starts asking questions of how you LOST your last job.
How is it you think teachers are spoiled? You have no idea of all the responsibilities involved! I've been a teacher for six years, and I don't own a home, can't afford to. I've got a lot of student loan debt so I could become a teacher and you seem to think we're overpaid? I've never been on a cruise, so what the hell are you talking about? Jealous rage is all it is.
Welcome to the new American poverty: brought to you by anti-union, greedy, slave-driving despots who can't stand the thought of their fellow citizen trying to struggle to a level which approaches theirs.
Two cars? A bigger house? Are you daft, man? Many of us are just trying to get by on the peanuts you throw our way. You want to see Cairo riots in your home town, just keep up the efforts at keeping us down.
This is the dumbest most worthless post (#8 - Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:25 AM PST) I've ever seen on newsvine ! Just my opinion of course!
Mac Deezy: But you don't live in Madison. See Sven's comment above about the bus drivers. That's just one example of radical leftism running amuck and out of control.
Waterdog:
Sven's comment about the bus driver is probably bull@!$%#. If the driver did get paid that much, he/she probably worked many hours of overtime to boost the salary, which is only right. Wouldn't YOU want to get paid extra for working longer hours? And who's to say the salary wasn't boosted because the driver was asked to work longer hours because of personnel cuts?
I seen Svens comment. What I didn't seen though was any credible evidence that it's true.
Out of all of their drivers, seven made over 100K in 2009. They were the among the senior members that get first crack at overtime. 2009 was also witness to the second highest rider total in over 40 years in Madison. They paid out a total of 1.9 million in overtime that year.
There was also a city hiring freeze that year that didn't allow for vacancies to be filled which resulted in going over budget for overtime pay by nearly 500K. However, for salaries, they were under budget by nearly 300K. If the city didn't freeze hiring, they could have saved money instead of losing it.
Tell madison to go after their comptroller making over 150K a year and the Police Chief making over 145K a year.
Change the policy of how overtime is distributed and how part time help is allocated and you solve this problem. You don't have to throw the baby out with the bath water.
NYMike,
Thanks for providing the info. In one of the very early posts, someone who claimed to be an actual bus driver in Madison posted similar facts.
And they will NEVER cut from the top, it's always the helper-monkey who gets trampled on.
This whole mess was precipitated by the Republican Party and unfettered corporate greed and now they are using this as a pretext for going after people (Working Americans) who did not cause this problem in the first place but will in the end suffer the most because of it. Politically it is brilliant - BLAME THE VICTIM! And when they do away with collective bargaining Nation wide and for all time then only the corporations will benefit from Citizens United!!!!!!
Just so I get this logic right, its ok to drive a company into the ground, lay off all the workers and scam their pensions to line your pockets and still get paid many millions (before your bonus). But a bus driver is not worth 100 K?
You would think the right who advocates for personal responsibility and getting what they are deserved would applaud these hard working bus drivers who were able to stay in their jobs to work their way up to this impressive figure.
What will it take for this republican whine to end? Do you want public employees to wear shackles while they work?
Tank - it isn't a corporation who is going to benefit from the PUBLIC employees picking up some of their own healthcare and retirement costs. It is the TAXPAYERS who pay their salaries.
We have all had to make concessions to keep our jobs and benefits in the last several years in the private sector. I already have less to give, so how about the public sector take a little less?
First, you do realize that it was the autoworkers unions that raped the auto industry and forced the rest of us to bail them out right? And that was a PRIVATE company. With public services the employees not only get to choose their union reps they also get to help choose the opposition. Basically they (the unions) have the ability (read-money) to influence who they will have to sit across the table from during any negotiations. It doesn’t take rocket scientist to realize this is a recipe for disaster. The reality is there is no need for public service unions; there are other protections in place for public employees.
Backcountry....Last time I checked, the unions do not run the company...that's the responsibility of MANAGEMENT. I've never a report of any management official at one the auto manufacturers being 'forced' to agree to any labor contract. They may agreed to them even though they didn't like them but I'm pretty sure nobody was twisting their arm, holding a gun to their head or kidnapped their family members and were holding them and threating harm if the official didn't settle.
This business about unions somehow forcing business to do something is just plain BS. The MANAGEMENT agreed because they wanted to for reasons that benefited them. If it didn't work out to the advantage of the company then it was the MANAGEMENT that made a mistake by agrreing to a deal thatwasn't good for the company. LABOR does not make contracts FOR the company...they make them for the union. MANAGEMENT makes contracts for the company. That's something you need to get straight. If the contracts weren't good the company...why would MANAGEMENT agree to them? Laziness, no other options? If they didn't have any other options...why not? Poor management maybe?
What a disgusting post! I hope you will have your pink slip soon so that you can understand that there is a need for unions and collective bargaining. When in Britain Children worked in Mines and died early from diseases the unions brought a civilized society in, which cares for workers in return for their work. I have been an HR Manager with major corporations and I can say that these large entities have nothing in mind for workers. The only thing that counts is the profit. May we helped to fall back to dark times both politically and in our society. Republicans seem to want just that and I would like to see those idiotic workers without jobs in Michigan and Ohio that think the Reps will bring them back into work. Be assured, you will stay out of work.
No sh!t! Keep the union happy or everyone walks off the job. Yeah, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that MANAGEMENT would "benefit" from cars rolling off the assembly line. The UAW has a long history of playing the big three against one another. They would never strike at all three simultaneously, they pick out one (typically the biggest at that moment) strike, and while one company has no cars rolling off the line the other two pick up the shortfall. Which of course provides even more “incentive” for MANAGEMENT to cave into the demands of the union.
Next time you might want to get a clue what you’re talking about BEFORE you go off on a rant.
You're a spineless brown noser. you've probably never even gotten your hands dirty working you effing snob. You go to work each day over the roads, and bridges we build and never give them a second thought. you work in high rises and, malls, structures that we beat our bodies to an early grave to build yet you don"t give it a second thought. You don't give it second thought because all you care about is yourself. You piece of Cr@p! You wouldn't survive a day in our world. Shut the h$ll up and show us the respect we deserve you pencil neck, tie wearin sissy!
WHY is it soooooo frigging hard for people to understand that state and federal governments ARE NOT CORPORATIONS!!! People in the public service industries have protections not given to employees of major corporations. Not the least of which is the ability to VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE NEXT TIME. Don't see too many CEO's who have to worry about that when they decide to screw over their employees do you?
And can we PLEASE stop referencing things that don't even relate to the last century let alone this one. (btw Joachim I would LOVE to see just one single source that references unions ending child labor in mines in the UK. JUST ONE, please)
@oreraider
Exactly who are you talking to? You do realize there are 14 post above yours, were you directing your comment at anyone of those post in particular or just barking at the moon?
Backcountry... all your words in 8.14 and you didn't even touch on how it is you think the unions somehow forced them to sign contracts. Outmaneuvering isn't forcing. They companies did the things they did because THEY WANTED TO. Their reasons should have been in the best interests of the company.......after all, that's what MANAGEMENT is for. It seems the MANAGEMENT wasn't up to the task. Using your train of thought, the LABOR is just supposed to take whatever crumbs the company decides THEY are willing to give and be very happy about it, that kinda sounds like being enslaved. It wasn't like the unions dropped an atomic bomb on them and killed or imprisoned 75% of their male children over the age of 16 to get it done.
I think the part that bothers you is that when people actually work together they can get things done in spite of over-whelming obstacles. That's what's happening in the Arab countries as we speak. It happened in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
I also think some people have staked so much of their life to sucking on someones teat who has been perceived to be an 'important person' simply because they've somehow managed to accumulate large sums of money are having a hard time realizing that perhaps there's more to life and wondering what the future their descendants will have and doing things that will hopefully make that future a better place to live for PEOPLE. These rich people have little in the way of loyalty to anything (other than gathering vast sums of wealth) or anyone, and people are learning.....again....that they must take control of the situation if they want any chance at all at life. There are starting to be signs that people are beginning to more highly value the gifts they have received from previous generations and are taking steps to insure that future generations continue to benefit from them also.
People are finding themselves energized again to take control of their lives, and I see that it bothers some quite a bit....to which I say....HAHAHA...... democracy is coming back to life.
johnnyt- It's not rocket science. As long as the UAW strikes at one auto company that company loses money while their competition makes more. If Ford is losing money while watching Chevy and Chrysler take away their customers they are eventually going to HAVE to cave into whatever demands the Union want. Dude, this is recorded history, look up some facts and see for yourself.
The only people that are bothered in Wisconsin are the union members and the Democrats. Democracy IS coming back to life. The people of Wisconsin elected a governor who made this issue a top priority. The people of Wisconsin want this to happen and a MINORITY of people are attempting to circumvent the democratic process. They will fail, democracy will succeed and the collective bargaining rights of the public unions in Wisconsin will be truncated.
Backcountry....Using ones advantage to their benefit isn't forcing. That's a concept you need to get straight. If I walk up to you with a gun and demand you give me your wallet or I'll shoot you....that is forcing. Going into a store and paying the shopkeeper $2.00 for a $1.00 cup of coffee doesn't count as being forced to buy it. The buyer didn't have to pay the extra dollar, but elected to because of reasons that made him/her want to do it.. This is where you are wrong. The companies thought they were better off making the deals they made.
As far as Wisconsin goes...they'll have to find their own way, but if they are going to enact laws this year and then repeal them next year when the people vote in new representatives, doesn't seem to me a method that will be good for stability in our country. But......that's neither here nor there as far as unions being blamed for the auto industry debacle. I'll repeat once more that it was the MANAGEMENT of the company that ran the companies into the ground. There's much ado about taking responsibility and all the blah, blah, blah that is going along with it, but when it comes to these high bucks managers failing the companies, there's not much taking responsibility. That's the hypocrisy of it to me. They are using a full scale diversion tactic to get people to believe that they weren't the ones who actually made decisions that weren't very smart, they get surrogates to try and somehow make a group that does't have ANYTHING AT ALL to do with managing the company responsible. If they were to admit that they indeed were the ones running the company and the companies were in fact being ran into the ground, they couldn't justify their compensation packages they were/are receiving.......so don't look for any responsibility taking on their part.
I've done the best job I can in a limited venue to explain why I do not believe the fault of failing auto companies should be laid at the unions doorstep. If I've made any errors feel free to correct me. To me it's simply a matter of calling a spade a spade. While I can see a need for unions, I do not agree with them in lockstep.....especially with regard to disbursement of union funds to less than savory businesses and individuals under the guise of 'investments'. As far as promoting their political beliefs, the unions are made up of living breathing people. If they decide they want to organize and mobilize for a particular candidate or party I'd say that should be up to the membership of the union, but I do not have any say whatsoever in any unions decisions.
Unions have their issues, and they are going to have to start addressing many of them I have always had an issue with people that demand to collective bargain but when cuts have to be made they throw the young guys under the bus with the layoffs instead of taking a small pay cut across the board.
It isn't the unions that caused issues for the automakers, less innovative designs, keeping brands that should have been axed long ago. Poorly constructed trade agreements that undercut the labor market forcing people to take lower wages. There is just a range of various things that contributed to it.
Oooook johnny, I get it now. As long as management allows the union to gut the company then it is their own fault for being so lackadaisical. Gotcha.
Btw, just out of curiosity and if you don’t mind me asking, how much are your UAW fees on, say, an annual basis?
Right, because $70 an hour in wages, pension, health care, paid vacations, etc for a factory worker is an obvious recipe for success.
Oh no !
The only reason the Japanese have been kicking our ass ,is because ,they don't take 4 joint and a beer ,lunch breaks
They probably wouldn't support an Impeached pervert , selling out nuke secrets ...Either !
Backcountry...You are making some progress with your thinking by at least starting to admit that the companies were the ones who made decisions for the company. Keep up the logical thinking and you just might get around to seeing who really put the companies in the shape they were in.
What makes you think I am affiliated with the UAW? Is it because I actually understand the whole MANAGEMENT/LABOR concept a little better than you, and the only thing you can think to say is "how much are your annual UAW dues'? Good one. That really cleared up a lot of things.....yessireee! You sure showed me! You probably also believe the MANAGEMENT TEAM that ran the auto companies in the ground were worth every penny they received. I also wonder if some of the reason that the UAW received those contracts were due to the management themselves being grossly overpaid for ruining the companies and in trying to justify their compensation let the workers have more....but what the hey....it's a free country and that's what free enterprise is all about....right? Just don't try blaming someone else for for your own stupidity!That's only compounding matters.
Your line of thinking takes credit for all the success and no credit for all the failure...that's a good deal...if you can get it! But you won't be getting it from me.
By the way....even though it's none of your business, I'll tell you anyway...I pay the UAW exactly zero in annual dues.
Jovi1: While I'm not absolutely certain, I do not believe the unions cut people by age. I believe they cut by senority. I believe they would cut a 60 year old with 5 years senority before they would cut a 27 year old with 6 years senority. It only stands to reason that if they are using senority as a measure then older people would be in a better position generally because they've had a longer life to gain that senority if they joined at an early age....but it isn't always the case..
Johnny- for what it’s worth I do not believe the UAW was 100% responsible for what happened to the auto industry and I am relatively certain that management makes considerably more than they’re actually worth. But if you think the union bears no responsibility then you are, quite simply, a fruitcake. And if you believe unions cannot force management into accepting things they do not want then you are utterly clueless OR you are a union exec trying to con the rest of us into believing a bunch of garbage.
The FACT of the matter is that BIG unions have become just as corrupt, if not more so, than the BIG corporations. The only difference between the two is that there are laws protecting even non-union employees from corps but there is NO protection from the potential abuses of the unions. And when someone tries to put those protections in place you can clearly see what happens.
Getting stoned at lunch for the last 4 decades ,sure as hell didn't help !
Backcountry....A fruitcake? I guess that falls into the same category as 'how much do I pay the UAW in union dues.
Right before that I thought we were getting closer to an understanding because you seemed to understand that the companies were in the drivers seat.
I'll stand by any comment that I've made about the unions forcing the companies to do something they didn't want to do. The company can take their bat & ball and go home...nobody from the unions were forcing them to keep their doors open. They looked at all the factors and decided that signing the contract was better for them than not signing. Again....no gun was held to their head or their families threatened. It's a business. They buy labor like they buy tires. They need tires to make a car and they NEGOTIATE for them. If they don't like the price of the tires they don't buy them....of course....just like labor, without the tires the car can't be. That's a concept you seem unable to understand. In fact....many did just that and took their game to another field. And though this is a topic for another discussion,I'll briefly touch on it just to add some background to my beliefs about Corporate America. I believe that taking technology developed in this country mostly at the expense of the taxpayer through contracts to companies that generate a good portion of their revenue and technological breakthroughs from those government contracts, is at the very least unethical and possibly treasonous.
As you can guess I am not in total agreement that the corporations do not have any protections. I believe they have plenty of protections....not the least of which is the finest government money can buy.
I'll grant you that unions haven't always fostered the highest standards. Organized crime has had a serious taint on the unions in the past. That's pretty much a thing of the past I believe. The likes of Rudy Giuliani and company have dealt them a crippling blow and here in NY they recently rounded up a bunch more from NY, CT., RI, and NJ. They haven't eliminated them but they've been pretty well marginalized. I think a lot of the stereotypes people use when bashing unions no longer apply, but because they did persist for a long time people just keep right on thinking they still do. I believe that the unions are weakened to the point where they cannot do much good any longer. I also believe that they may have hit the bottom of their fall and will mount a revival fueled by business' latest attempts at exploiting the American worker. The real surprise to me about all this is the Tea Party and their apparent zeal about illegal immigrants flooding our country. One would think that they would realize that if illegal immigration is one of their priorities, they would want to ally themselves with the unions because it is those very same union workers that are being assaulted by illegal workers and who most likely are undercutting their own ability to make a decent living . It seems like a natural alliance to me, but instead the Tea Party has decided that the American Worker, if he's in a union is the enemy and a multi-billionaire who only has a win-win situation by all this anti-union effort being successful is their friend. I find that strange..... actually...I find it very strange.
You said that when someone tries to put protections in place for the Corporations we see what happens. They only thing I can say to you is that one corporations protections might be another mans bonds. I understand completely the amount of influence that Big Business has with our government, but....as long as politicians still have some fear of the people in this country they will not go the extra mile and try to strip all rights and freedoms away. I believe that most politicians only use the papers that founded this country when it benefits them to do it and basically they'd use them for toilet paper if that was all that was available. It's only the belief that a major @!$%#storm would erupt if they tried pushing any harder right now. That's what makes this effort in Wisconsin so puzzling to me. I think that possibly they might have believed that a shock and awe type of assault on the unions would catch them and everyone else by surprise and they could break them before anyone even knew what happened. Things haven't exactly played out that way and people are becoming interested in this issue because it could very possibly have ramifications for them as well. This might in the end prove to be the undoing of the GOP/TP if people come to the belief that they were played for suckers by them. You might laugh at that....but.....just look around the world and lot of previously long held beliefs are being proven wrong almost daily.
I hope this is just the beginning. as neversurrender says, I'm sure Eric Holder is quivering and sweating trying to get a hold of this. I hope he finds a way to sue. It will cement the fate of the Obama "regime". I use the word regime intentionally.
Unfortunately I live in Massachusetts. We will have to go way more broke for this dream to ever occur in our state.
After Nov 2, I don't think Obama will get involved. His own skin is on the line now and from what he's telegraphing, it looks like he'll throw as many bodies under the bus as needed to get re elected.
Nov 2 is proof that we the people are still in control. We have made a difference!
Welcome to the "Obama Regime"? If so, it would be to fight the "Walker Dictatorship".
Socialism was alive and well in Wisconsin and elsewhere in the country long before Obama came into office. As in any communist country you have the majority who work for the government receiving all the benefits and the lower class struggling to feed themselves. Money is power and I'm tired of giving mine away to the government, which includes government employees. I'll take one of those jobs at half the pay, easily contribute more towards insurance, and with the money I save on taxes I'll have my own pension plan.
yes, the cushy life of ease of the government employee. baby you are so jealous of something you have no comprehension of. The majority of Wisconsin citizens work for the govt? the poor are struggling to get food because of govt employees?
I don't know what's worse, that you think this or that someone reading what you wrote will smugly (and blindly) agree.
Looks like a lot of jealousy on this thread.
Welcome to the new world. You have a job, quit or STFU!
That talk is the language of a slave. Wear your chains with pride, and get back to work.
When republicans ran government unemployment was 4.6% and jobs were going begging. Now that democrats are running government unemployment is 9% with a record 22 months above 9% and people are going begging.
In the four years that democrats have controlled congress, we've gone from a sellers market to a buyers market. When there are ten jobs for every person, workers prosper, when there are ten people for every job, workers suffer. You want better worker conditions? Vote republican!
Valhalla Phil, you are incorrect. The unemployment rate began to rise within the first two years of GWBush's first term. And, he was responsible for most of the current deficit by funding two wars off of the budget while cutting taxes for the rich.
Look it up. Educate yourself and don't just listen to Fox and Rush.
Fast moving. You may want to look it up. Your way off base.
Brenda, You reallly are showing how little you know. Clinton left Bush with a surplus. Again turn off your TV and read a little bit. Bush left this country in a mess!!!
Actually the "Clinton Surplus" was a lie. He fudged when the numbers were reported to us to show he was getting the budget on track. If there was a surplus why did the national debt continue to grow when he got the budget "balanced"? In short he didn't and he lied to us. It isn't the first time a politician has lied and it won't be the last unfortunately.
Valhalla your memory may be not so good that you understand what brought us there. Two wars by a warmonger party and Bush in order to profit for is family from the oil game. Two wars that have cost trillions of dollars, that have robbed the middle class of their wealth and and sickening attitude of a republican party to reward the rich with a tax cut that is not paid for. Get your facts right before you make idiotic statements.
By most of the posts above, the reason we are in an outsourcing paradise for the mega corporations, Corporations paid Republicans to push FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS. Democrats were either, too stupid, or too greedy to stop them from doing it.
Our economy will not recover so long as the FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS are in effect with a treaty, or our tariffs being almost zero.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
To stop outsourcing and return jobs to the US, we must end FREE TRADE in all practises.
This last statement is the only way we will ever fix the US economy, period.
We see unfolding democracy devouring itself: Using the power of election winnings to undue a half-century of collective bargaining for public workers.
Let's see the same people that enact these laws follow what they preach ie, cut their pensions and pay more of their fair share!
Maybe you need to look at Governor Walker's personal history of financial responsibility. Enlighten yourself.
I'm sure Gov. Walker has been turning away money and working hard all his life, LOL!
You're full of it Andro. Jase is spot on.
Financial responsibility at the expense of infrastructure and life. Read up on the some raiding of funds to cover up holes in his budget while he was a county supervisor. Then read up on the piece of cement that fell of the parking garage and killed a 15 year old.
Way to go anyone who voted Republican. Maybe someday and soon, the people of this country will realize that Republican's are NOT for middle class Americans, they are for the RICH, and that's the way it will always be. The rich pad their pockets, get them elected and screw the middle class!! I almost don't feel sorry for any of these people that voted this idiot Republican Governor in office, but then again, I do of course!
upnorthgirl,
LOL! I am a person of this country and I am middle class. I am so happy this is happening you wouldn't believe it! But then again you would have to understand that I'm all for paying someone what they're worth not what they demand they should be paid. Nothing in life is guaranteed sunshine. It's time the parasitic union leaches figured this out. Maybe you'll get a clue to.
Conservative and usually vote republican. Forced out of a job in a school district due to service in my country's military, I've made under the poverty level each year since 2001. No public hand outs, no welfare, no unemployment. Has it been a bitch making it all work? You bet, but you do what you have to. Yes, I've survived as a single parent for 9+ years on less than $15K a year. And I just paid my house off... Time for the rest of you to STFU and start doing what you have to. Dumb liberals - for everyone who thinks like them and no one else.
Great fake story Jase.
We're talking about getting a fair wage for a group of people who spent 4 or more years in college and then CHOSE to take less money getting a job to help our future. A teacher gets paid less than their market even when including benefits. They generally get about 2% a year but since they work for 30+ years everybody like to point at the teachers at the top end of the spectrum and say "look how much teachers' make". Its a joke and its dishonest. If you don't know the economics of the situation stay quiet. Its better to not say anything and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
So Sven,
How much is a master's degree worth in pay? Go do some research and look up average Salary of those with Master's Degrees. Compare that with teacher's salaries. Considering most states require a Master's degree to teach above Elementary school, is that pay comproble?
If it is, then you have nothing to bitch about. If it is less, then yes, they are underpaid. If it is more, then maybe you have a point. Do some research and let us know. In the State of Washington, I KNOW that teachers make a hell of a lot less then what their degrees would bet them in the public sector. I always vote for teacher pay increases because they are getting short changed.
If they are getting "underpaid" there is nothing stopping them from getting a real job in the private sector. There is no such thing as underpaid. You and the employer agree on pay or one of you walks. If everyone was paid what they THOUGHT they were worth, we'd all be billionaires! :<)
Your real worth, (as an employee), is what someone is willing to pay you. Anything else is delusional.
basedrum777
Hardly a fake story, If you would like you can come and visit me, in my tiny shack in Ashland WI and I'll show you my life of the last 10 years. Including my Social security statements, my military DD214's, introduce you to my daughter and even let you have a gander at my financial accounts over the period I discussed above.
As for the fair wage arguement, do you think I should make more than a teacher when getting shot at and taking mortar fire when deployed or do you think that those with a 4 year degree are worth more than those that put themselves in harms way?
I sure hope your willing to pay me what a public employee receives for a computer science degree when I graduate in 2013...
and, anyone can quote Mark Twain, it's just a shame you can't heed his advice.
and you know this is a fake story how exactly?
Lets see here im in my late 30s, my mother who just retired from a teaching position ( non union ) raised my sister and I in the low ten thousand a year salary. She was a teacher, not because she wanted money, she was a teacher because she loves kids and wanted to help them with their future. It can, and does, happen everyday. You go without Cable, Game systems, new flat screen TVs.. Xmas presents are socks and underwear not throw away games you see now.
See you and other people griping about teachers pay are looking at the National Average. My mother, and thoes like her, ARE Underpaid.. Look up teh difference between pay and bennies between Union Teachers, and Non-Union Teachers. The difference is as drastic as night and day.. We arent talking about non union teachers here. We are talking about unioned teachers.. Who in general are in teaching for the paycheck and not love for the job. IF IT was about the kids, then they would be doing their damn job and teaching the kids intead of protesting having to pay parts of thir pension and insurance.
ValhallaPhil,
What makes you say that teaching is not a real job? I have a feeling your education level has a little to do with it.
That's usually the case. People who hate teachers, as many of you seem to, usually didn't do very well in school and, of course being people who preach "personal responsibility" they blame the teacher.
Then CEOs won't mind earning less when they screw up a company, since there is no such thing as underpaid right? How much do you make Phil? How would you feel if all your experience and training boiled down to.. "We are paying you X. Cope." What if that amount was the same as the guy who just graduated high school, with no training, and no experience?
I've seen that happen to teachers. I had a friend who had a masters degree, and four years of experience on the job. She was earning less then $40,000 a year. Me? No degree, some experience, earning $50,000 at the time. It is called equitable pay. It was not fair to the teachers.
Now consider this, if there is no value in being a teacher, who is going to teach our children reading, writing and math? Do you have time to do it? I don't. I have to work 8 hours a day, plus commute an hour each way, plus cook dinner, and do dishes, plus my school work so I can get that degree I was stupid enough to skip out on 15 years ago.
If we don't pay teachers an equitable salary, then the best teachers stop teaching, and we create a self defeating circle. Only the Teachers who can't get good paying jobs, teach, and really, I don't want a teacher teaching my child, if they arent good enough to get a better job elsewhere.
I used to live in Wisconsin - back in the days of Stick it to 'em Tommy Thompson - a real egomaniac of a governor. Back in those days the only substantial difference between the republicans and the democrats was that the republicans would waste money by throwing it at the road and prison builders and the democrats would waste money by throwing it at public employees and teachers. None of these clowns cared the least bit about the people paying the taxes for all this stuff so long as they could keep getting funding for their favored constituencies. As a result of that, Wisconsin had some of the highest taxes in the country. Now it looks like the tide may be changing.
Congratulations to Walker if/when he gets this through. Its not as good as making Wisconsin a right-to-work state but its a major step on the way and no doubt one that will actually save the taxpayers of that state - the real middle class - some serious money.
Brian from Seattle,
WTF does the level of eduction have to do with the level compensation? You epitomize the thinking that got this country into the mess the State of Wisconsin is finally trying to dig itself out of. Using your logic if I went to school and got a Masters or PHD in bumf$ckery I should be paid the same as an individual that got a Masters or PHD in chemistry. What planet does this logic fly on?
Upnorthgirl:
I hope you realize that unless you (or your parents) are working for the government, your wages or salary is paid by a rich person. By trying to emasculate the rich, you are killing the very group that is funding your support.
Even if you are working in a privately endowed university, your salary is paid through the tuition paid by rich parents or by grants that are made possible by donations from rich alumni. If you are a goverment employee or working for a state supported institution--then your salary is ultimately being paid by the taxpayer. The same taxpayer that voted a legislature into office that will do something about your state deficit.
If the GOP really supports only the rich, then they are simply looking out for the cash cow that makes our country run--and that ultimately benefits all of us.
Quite frankly, I think the Dem's and the GOP are both spending us into oblivion, and I'm thankful that your Governor has the cajones to take a first step in the opposite direction.
Oh, and someone pointed a gun at new teachers and made them take the job? I believe that, in this country, one has to apply for a job to get one. Everyone has a CHOICE. If you decide to go to college and get a Master's Degree in education, at what point did you not realize that teachers pay for an M. Ed. is a teensy bit less than an MBA?
It's all a moot point anyway as to how much the person is worth if THERE IS NO MONEY TO PAY THEM.
Make some concessions or face the layoffs. That is the choice being offered. Just like in the private sector, if there is no money, there ain't going to be no job.
Funny, sven says the education level has nothing to do with pay yet he will turn around and scream about how a doctor goes to school and gets all that education so they should be highly paid. ADHD I tell you. You people can't make up your minds. You're on then off then on then off then on again. It makes ones head spin.
Shellie,
Please reference my quote. Liar.
It's a gun from inside, but yes. A good teacher is compelled to teach. I, for one, resisted majoring in education, and went through three different majors before I relented. It also needs to be done, so taking away incentives to teach is sort of a bad idea.
Any teachers here know what would happen to our TRFs if we lost the union?
Dear Republicans: You wanted balanced budgets as long as the cuts do not affect your current lifestyle in any way. Sorry, it doesn't work like that. Everyone pays (except for the uber rich, of course).
Hmmm..., I heard it differently... More like everyone pays, except for the unions, of course
Bo, nobody believes that. We will all have to sacrifice. Somehow government workers thought they were exempt. Today will prove otherwise.
Because I trust politicians to treat their employees fairly. Welcome to the Wal-
Mart state. Productivity will soon fail to zero. Get ready for mid east type demonstrations. Who is going to stop it? The disgruntled state workers? Not likely.
I have lived in a right to work state, been employed in companies where I joined the Union and in companies where I chose not to. I have worked for companies that had no Union. I have worked in management and in craft.
I have seen managers abuse there positions and seen people get fired not over real work performance, but over who some one is dating, or over a fender bender in the parking lot. But all that happened in the companies where there was no Union to stand up for worker rights. In every Unionized company I have worked, there has been way less employer intimidation possible. Unions are not about just the money, yes they do work for the benefit of there members. But they also support safe and dignified work environments.
Now I have seen employees abuse Union protection, so I can't say they are perfectd. But erroring in the side of more protections seems like it makes for a better over all work environment.
Not quoting statistics here, just a long life experience.
Ok a stupid number that is ashamed of his or her real name these are the facts - Wisconsin had no deficit - given by an unbiased government agency - however all the tax benefits given by Walker for his crony supporters would put Wisconsin in the red - oh my god where will the money come from? Eureka - what my boys in DC said to do on the backs of the civil servants - and bye the way we will break the unions because - why - duh - they support Democrats - Karl Rove's play book - the fat boy is still at work - don't you love him - a ton of money to break the Democratic Party
This is just the beginning....the government wants to get rid of unions. Soon, people will be working for whatever the employer wants to pay, as many hours as the employer wants you to work, and have no benefits, pensions etc.
Wendy,
You really don't have a clue, do you? An employer pays whatever he has to to get the caliber of workforce his market demands. You hire crappy people, like former State of Wisconsin workers, and you won't last in your industry very long. Employers hire the best they can afford for what their market dictates. You want a guaranteed job with a guaranteed wage you probably need to locate somewhere outside the sea to shining sea. :)
And the return of the company store. We will all be indentured servants with the way the Republicans are returning us to the days of the Robber Barons. If he were still alive, J.P. Morgan would be thrilled!!! I'm sure it pleases his off-spring. Let's hear it for the kleptocracy!!
FastMovingCloud,
Why don't you start your own business then? Or would that be to much for you to have to be responsible for yourself for a change?
I work, no make that worked at a non-union job for eight years, got laid off, the company put me on a " temporary layoff" said I would be back no later than December, yet here I am still laid off. As I write this many more are being laid off because of " salees are down there is a lack of work" they are being told when things are picked up they will be recalled back to work, as soon as these workers are laid off the company has replaced them with temporary workers ( temps) who they pay less wages who don't get any benefits ( paid holidays, insurance, ( life or medical) so the company can make a bigger profit margin. The benefits oof the workers that were laid off were those they earned through hard work and the time they faithfully worked for the company. If there was a lack of work the temps would not have been needed for lack of demand for the products. Do those of you out there think unions are the problems that without them the companies will look out for the workers, look at my company and you will see the union was not the problem ( we had none ) the drive for profit was and will continue union or nonunion. bussiness are all about profit and care not for the workers.
Svenolafson, thanks, you nailed it pretty good.
realnard...Why were you one of the first to get laid off, while others kept working ??...Obviously they were more valuable to the company than you were. That should tell you something right from the get go.....you got 99 weeks of unemployment coming....
Businesses are about profit. If not, then why bother going into business. Jobs are a byproduct of a business needing to provide more goods or services to their customers than the original company could supply. When the demand for those goods or services goes down....a subsequent reduction in the workforce is the result.
It is called 1920s.
 Now let's hope this catches on all over the nation......and I work for a county gov't. It would make it easier to get rid of the non-productive gov't employees who just show up and collect a paycheck....which there are a lot of.
RockinOregon:
[It would make it easier to get rid of the non-productive gov't employees...]
And it will make it easier to get rid of YOU as well...ever think of that? If YOU think you are a model government employee, and your job is the "safe" one, think again.
Be careful what you ask for...you just might get it.
I keep hoping that our NJ Gov Christie can whack more and more of our overpopulation of highly-paid no-show or excess administrators and then proceed to tear the cheeit out of the unions when many of the CBAs coming up this year. I'm out of money to keep paying what I pay for property and state taxes.
Careful Rockinoregon you may just get your wish.
If Rockinoregon is earning his/her pay there probably won't be a problem. Why should the taxpayer have to continue to pay for deadwood?
you repugs are brilliant!!! Did you know that another tea partier in the Kansas legislature just introduced a bill to remove child labor laws? thats the next step in creating a two class society. Gosh, we can return to the time that 10 yr olds worked in sweat shops.
Little did Wisconsin voters know that when they elected Walker as governor, they were getting a Mubarek instead. Since the legislators and governor are state employees, they should have their pensions slashed as well. Taxpayers give them way too much money. What is next for Wisconsin? End of the 40 hour work week, erasing child labor laws, and worker safety laws? Looks like the Republican legislators up for re-election are trying to make it real easy to get voted out of office in 2012.
Brian - Are you from Wisconsin?
Brian J,
LOL! I guess they won't get the Union vote! LOL!
Hey Brian, you know why State of Wisconsin workers don't look out the window in the morning?
Cause if they did that they wouldn't have anything to do in the afternoon. :D
Since those are Federal Laws, no those will not be changing..
BUT no sence in wasting good meaningless rant from the Demo playbook. ( just look how many ppl in this thread are using the EXACT same language)
Missouri has him beat on repealing child labor laws.
I'm not against collective bargaining for the workers, but as a taxpayer in WI (read as employer) I have never been to the negotiating table with the public workers union as my taxes increased. I have to contribute to my pension and pay for health care coverage (which increased 2300% in my 16 yrs at work) and take furlough weeks, so I would draw a real hard line negotiating with the workers to help pay 100% for them. Sorry WI employees, I really can't afford your services anymore after paying registration fees and income taxes and property taxes and being billed from the fire department for a 1 mile ambulance trip $600. I just wish he hadn't promised you no furloughs or lay offs.
I wish I could get back to paying so little for my benefits. And I'm in a union and I work for a utility! sorry no sympathy, I went from paying 0% to 20% for health and from a db pension to a 401k and no one shed any tears for me. I'm just happy to be employed.
Spoken like a true indentured servant. Enjoy your servitude. Once your union is completely dismantled (with your approval, apparently) you can be replaced by someone making even less (probably not even in this country) and provide no benefits.
Does the phrase "slippery slope" mean anything to you?
sure does, the slippery slope of entitlements is what got us into this mess in the first place, I'm just enough of a realist to see that things are out of balance all around. You can't just keep crying for more when the kitty is in the hole.
FastMovingCloud - where does the money come from to continue on the path we are on now? We are broke, we all are gonna have to tighten our belts.
You are making the taxpayer the indentured servant to the public employee. In essence you are saying that we must all work harder and harder in the private sector so that we can give more and more to the government employees.
Does slippery slope mean anything to you?
No were not broke the money is being sent to the top in the form of massive tax cuts that don't help anyone but the rich and Corporate welfare. Stop that money from being artificially sent to said top and we would be fine.
We keep hearing about Shared sacrifice whenever they try and take away rights or wages. Well the rich haven't given up just @!$%# yet while cuts have already been made by nearly every member of the poor and middle class.
As a resident of Wisconsin, I applaud. There was a time and a place for unions, but they have outgrown anything that is even closely realistic today.
Matt - This hurts you as well. You just don't know it yet. All those work related items you take for granted like a 40 hour work week, weekends off, vacation/holdiay pay, child labor laws and I could go on....all negotiated by unions past and eventually trickled into the private workforce as well. Now my friend you are witnessing the demise of the middle class and the benefits you take for granted at your place of employment will erode as well. Wishing bad to come to unionized middle class workers is wishing bad to come to the middle class of this country.
OMG!!! It's Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" all over again!!! LOL!!!!
Laurie. I do not wish bad to anyone. I do wish our condition was much better, but it is in a sad state of affairs. How long am I and my neighbors supposed to foot the bill for overpayed staffs who have staffs of their own? I wish them all well, but don't want to end up out of control like our neighbor state to the south. I looked at the proposal, and to me it's not that grievous.
Gotta love the scare tactics...
I totally agree. Unions served a good purpose and began with a noble cause, but now they've gone so far over the "workers rights" line that it's hurting everyone. Their definition of the word "rights" is pretty cushy. My husband is a teacher (TX) and we have to contribute to his pension, whether we want to or not, it's just taken from his checks, and we pay 65% of our health premiums! These people should jump at the chance to only pay 13% versus the alternative of thousands of layoffs.
Svenolafson,
That reference just went right over the teabagger's heads. "Upton who? Jungle what?"
It's interesting that people are making this out to be liberals vs. conservatives, Republicans vs. Democrates. The bottomline is that we are at a budget crisis and we need compromise. Stripping bargining power of union will not solve the deficit as long as the people / companies in power are not willing to contribute equally. We need to held everyone accountable. As a conservative, I don't have a problem with bill as long as it is done equally. Unions for police, patrol officers and fire fighters not being part of the bill sets a bad precedent for the future. Also, the bill should impact union and non-union employees equally, including legislatures and the governor himself. Leadership is a about setting a good examples for others for follow. Thus far, Scott is failing on that respect.
FastMovingCloud,
The irony of your post to me is hilarious. My post was sarcasm that went right over your Left Wing Liberal Wack Job head, genius.
Us "teabaggers", you know the everyday working men/women of this country that know nothing of guarantees of any kind, nor should I say want them since guarantees of any kind come with strings attached which in turn limit our freedoms? Us teabaggers, a name I will honorably wear this day forward, don't want dick from anyone. What I have I earn. When you pathetic "enlightened ones" get a clue and figure out that all you'll ever have is the memory you've left behind and not all the crap you got at the expense of others than maybe there will be some hope for you. Until then I'm going to download the State of Wisconsin anthem "On Wisconsin" and proudly play it every morning in honor of this memorable day!
Anyone who has to pump themselves at another person's expense is themselves a moron, a bully. So easy to blather whilst sitting your fat arse on that computer chair.
I think its about time the people starting taking out wackos like Walker before its child labor and sweat shops for AmeriCuns!!
Growing Angrier by the minute,
Really? Like maybe have a cross hair on them?
A mind is a terrible thing to waste Growing Angrier...
That kind of talk is not helpful. I don't want to see union-busting approved either but talking of "taking people out" is not the way. You need to seek counseling for your anger management problem.
Don't death wish anyone, Growing Angrier by the minute. Mind the Code of Honor.
Wow-Union Busting is rearing it's ugly head and taking us back to the 19th. century folks. What's next children in sweat shops- the elimination of child Labor Laws? Jacob Riis-where are you when we need you? I guess when it's the federal govt. Repugs call it Big Brother-but it's okay when the states are oppressing the rights of their citizens-that's just "Big Business."
Please make a comparison to union busting in the 1800's to where unions are today.
Uh..., solution..., if you disagree with the state you are in then move to another state...
These brainwashed idiots by the news media. We are slowly going back to the dark ages while the rich get richer. So easy to brainwash americans. Media has never put out accurate facts about pay and retirement benifits. God help us all where this country is headed.
Joe -
Talk about brainwashed by the media! That was funny!
Child labor laws are already on their way out.
What a ridiculous post, yet it's the same mindless rant that keeps coming up whenever anyone tries to lessen the power of the unions.
Child labor laws will not be repealed if the unions disappear.
Sweat shops will not reappear if the unions disappear.
Fight it as you will but the American people are speaking loudly against the unions.
We're tired of having so many of our high school graduates having to take remedial reading and math before beginning their degree courses because somehow they graduated without learning the basics.
We're tired of paying the extra $1600 tacked on to each car to pay the union benefits.
I watched the unionized space center worers strike a few years ago despite the knowledge that their jobs were going to be eliminated with the closing of the shuttle program. They went on strike because they didn't want to contribute to their medical insurance and retirement packages. The strike set a length record, the union lost and got a 90 day gag order to keep it quiet, and the workers lost far more money during the strike than they could ever have hope to save by striking.
Oh, and the non-union replacements and managers had two scuccessful launches and cleared a huge backlog of work left by the union. The inion workers went back with their tails between their legs, that's exactly what they deserved.
If you don't think child labor abuses won't reappear, think again.
"In a move that is raising plenty of eyebrows, Missouri state Senator Jane Cunningham has proposed a bill that would "modify" child labor laws, eliminating the prohibition on employment of children under 14. The proposal has sparked an outcry in the state but Cunningham defends the bill, saying that it's important to cultivate a work ethic in young people and emphasizing that kids are still prohibited from working in dangerous professions."
As Jay Leno asked, why should 10 year old children in China get all the good jobs?
Or as Tom DeLay told a banquet crowd in Saipan:
"You are up against the forces of big labor and the radical left."
When the Clinton administration sought to yank Saipan's factories into the 20th century in 1994, requiring the workers be paid a minimum wage, overtime and their living conditions improved, the island government hired a platoon of well-connected Washington lobbyists, headed by former DeLay aide Jack Abramoff, to block the plan.
Someday, we'll be just like Saipan, just keep supporting the Koch brothers.
Madison has a history as a radically leftist city and does not represent the majority of the state. If they don't like being part of the real world, too bad. Fire them! The protesters in Madison are lucky that they live in the US and not in Bahrain or Libya. They should kiss the ground that they walk on.
Goahead and fire them then. Now pay their unemployment benefits, then their emergency room visit for heartburn, then their food stamps, then they do not pay income/sales tax, social security or medicare payments, etc.
Where is the future cost savings?
Firing them would just open a job for one of the 9.6% unemployed who are receiving unemployment benefits, going to the ER for heartburn, using food stamps, and not paying taxes. Society hasn't lost anything.
Just let the market determine what works. The only time there is unfairness is when artificial requirements are added to fair market situations. It amazes me how many people can disconnect value and wages. People should get paid for what they are worth in a fair market situation, not what they can get by use of threats (strike).
Waterdog, I totally agree with you. I grew up in Madison and the area is very liberal. The rest of the state is much more conservative and is looking for ways to cut the huge deficit that was left by many years of Democratic rule. The neighboring states of Illinois and Minnesota are doubling taxes to continue to pay the state union workers their high salaries and benefits. Both have democratic governors. Wisconsin is also looking at lowering corporate taxes. I bet many of the companies in Illinois and Minnesota will be looking to move to Wisconsin and bring many jobs with them. One more thing, many of my friends are teachers, and not one of them likes being part of the union. All the union does is support the lazy workers.
Madison has a reputation for many things, intellectual excellence and open-mindedness among them. It is precisely because of the atmosphere and attitude that exist in Madison that our UW continues to attract students and researchers of the highest caliber. As a registered democrat and lifelong WI resident, it might surprise many of you that I support the spirit of Walker's bill, but since many of the other stipulations aren't publicly known, I can't say I want to see it passed. As for businesses being drawn to WI because of tax breaks, I'll believe it when I see it. A company moving their operations just barely across the border in order to take advantage of tax breaks while staying close enough for their workers to still live in MN or IL means nothing to our state. That's like living in Chicago and driving to Milwaukee to pick up your welfare check, and the residents of WI know that happens all the time.
People without the education to be a teacher can't just "step into" a teacher's job. What kind of morons are you people? You'd have a screaming hissy fit. the REAL problem in WI is that only 1/3 of corporations pay state income tax. Funny that you overlook that little tidbit. Instead, you join Walker's band blaming public employees. If this piece of crap goes through, I hope you get buried in your uncollected garbage.
Guess what... assuming that you are right, if the other 2/3's of the corporations leave the state because they are forced to start paying state income taxes, then all the tax revenue from the employees that will no longer have jobs will be lost, not to mention the tax revenue that will be lost for goods not sold to the now unemployed worker.
And since when is it an individuals right to work under his or her own terms. If you're not happy with your employer then QUIT! Teachers are no different than any other worker in this country, they are paid by their employer to provide a service under the terms and conditions set by the employer, again, you don't like the terms then quit, that's your only right.
@lisa probably the same idiots that home school their kids, knowing that the world is flat, was created in seven days, and that God refuses to let America prosper because gay people are bad, not because some moron deliberately undercut the labor force here with severely damaging free trade agreements.
It is about time. The majority of unions in this country represent nothing more than organized crime. The sound principles for which the were initially created have been distorted and twisted over the years to become bastions for the lazy and overpaid.
What is amazing is these unions will support a candidate who will completely ruin there futures (Gore in 2000, Minnesota Iron Range) and not think twice about it, but when someone like Governor Walker tries to take away bargaining power, it becomes an all out war with propaganda being spread about how their jobs will become less safe and a mere 8% pay cut will force them to move out of state (Good riddens)! Add to that, these people will use their children to protest the change. How pathetic.
Unions helped a great deal in putting a president in place who supports an amendment for the re-distribution of weath... and now they whine about it when those chickens come home to roost. Guess it's only due to the fact Walker is a republican.
In a welfare state like Wisconsin, this is more than a welcome first step. The taxpayers finally get a break.
Union bashers.. what idiots...
Big business wants all unions crushed.. why? They want fair wages and labor practices.. that reduces profits..
Big businesses are making record profits so unions are not the problem.. But big business has done a great job of selling the lies... Many working class people are convinced that unions are bad or un needed.. fooled by the boss again.. duh..
BS Jase_rad ! I bet you would sing a different tune if you were in a union. Unbelievable how these people take the side of big business, the wealthiest 2%, insurance companies, etc.
Carl Rove was right: repeat something often enough and people (unthinking robot types that already have an agenda) will believe it.
WOW, how ignorant. The funny thing is that is what we think of you
over paid i bet all the bankers are not in your word over paid and the same people trying to pass this bill have a pension for just working on term and health care and everything else. i bet you are over paid. or you never need a pay increase i think you are a blind fool and could live of minimum wage to.
It's all working out quite well for them, after all they have jobs, should they not be grateful for that? Mmmmm the ruling class is in session. perhaps a time for the Guillotines return.
NO!?! what is wrong with you and others How far are you going to let the rich and corporate push you down. Just having a job should never be enough it speaks volumes of how beaten down some of you are to claim just haveing a job (@!$%# what it pays @!$%# how your treated) is enough.
First of all,where the hell are the union leaders!!! It looks to me like only a handful of people are taking on the republicans here. The whole concept of abolishing unions may not alarm many,but you have to know,that means that you are trusting big business and some state governments to treat employees with fairness and compassion........really?
As it's been pointed out repeatedly in this discussion, Wisconsin did not abolish any union, they merely put caps on annual compensation increases; prevented individuals from being forced to pay union dues to keep their jobs, and; created the requirment that unions annually prove that they have the support of the constituency which they purport to represent. So, stand down. The sky is not falling.
Candidly, I think it ironic to use the word "trust" in the same sentence as the word "union". It is largely because of unions (and liberals) that the US has lost it's competitive edge. Unaffordable wages and benefits and irrational job segregation and job protection render unionized companies/industries unable to compete in a global economy. Rewarding apathy, laziness and lack of responsibility undermines a nation.
We've lost our way on so many fronts. Equal opportunity should not guarantee equal outcome. It was never meant to do so. In a merit based economy, businesses will reward those individuals who contribute to their profitability. If they don't do so those individuals will go contribute to the profitability of another company. However, unions (and liberals) try to promote equal outcomes irrespective of merit, and not surprisingly merit is the victim.
While we in the US wring our hands about impairing the impunity of unions to foster inefficiency and mediocrity, or why people shouldn't have to pay for homes they purchased, but could not afford - less "developed" nations are creating meritocracies by demanding accountability and excellence. If you've ever worked in India or China, you understand - and you are afraid for your children's future.
This slope of entitlement has become too steep and too slippery to sustain. Unless we move back to the merit based principles that created the once dominant US, we will be unable to afford to compete on any meaningful level.
We must recognize and reward merit. Those awful rich people that the liberals want to punish are the ones that create the jobs for the rest. They do it by working hard, delaying gratification, staying focused and committed to a goal and by creating something of value. It is remarkable that they continue to do so for the marginal returns afforded after taxes.
I don't know of any Union that has looked out for workers rights. They tend to demand that the union members do what they are told and they (union leardership) get fat on the dues paid. They don't understand simple economics and have lead to this nation being on the verge of backrupcy.
"The story around the world is the rush to democracy," said Democratic Sen. Bob Jauch of Poplar. "The story in Wisconsin is the end of the democratic process."
BS...the story around the world is that those people over there are OPPRESSED...
Another idiotic comment from a democratic senator.
When those teachers/unions/people realize that their jobs are paid for by the taxpayer and that when revenues are down, some things have to change, maybe they'll wake up from their stupor.
This is the changing of the guard in America...fiscal responsibility is underway and it begins in the cheese state.
Unaffordable wages and benefits and irrational job segregation and job protection render unionized companies/industries unable to compete in a global economy. Rewarding apathy, laziness and lack of responsibility undermines a nation.
Many of these workers indeed are overpaid and basically have hurt their companies. They really don't deserve the money they make, especially in the rural areas they live in and in turn are the main reason jobs are going overseas.
So I guess the corporations sending jobs abroad is not the reason we have so few jobs here? Where is their 'delayed gratification"?
Yes, there are those that abuse their positions,as do many non-union workers...there are lamefolks all over...It quite insulting to say that we teach because we can't do antything else!!! Many of us left the private sector to become teachers because we wanted to try to make a difference..that doesn't mean we should work cheap just because we choose the profession!! We are not just educators anymore...we a social workers, counselors, character/values teachers...Isn't that the parents job?
Where would you be with out a teacher!!! We as teachers are expected to teach children who don't want to learn, whose parent don't care or who think their children are so perfect...we as a society worry so much about their self-esteem, they aren't being challenged. And if they don't get that "A"..then it's the teachers fault...nevr mind thatyour kid slet thru class or wasw texting or not paying attention..orturned very little work in or bombed the test when you gave them a complete study guide...we should give them a grade rather than they earn it!! It's rather frustrating to work so hard onlty to be told in many different way thatyou are a loser because you chose to be a teacher. No wonder Asia is advancing...they respect & honor teachers!!!
Why is that when the teaparty folks respond they have to call names? Shouldn't their ideas make it on their own merit rather than sensational verbage? Maybe they should have paid attention in English class & would have gain a better vocabulary.
@ Shredman
If it is only unions that create all the problems, why do people who work in non-union shops or industries having such a hard time too? According to your thinking industries who are non-union would not move overseas to become more competitive. But most all of our manufacturing HAS moved overseas. And if we are to take your advice and just work harder (merit) we will not have any problems. Well I do contribute a LOT to my employer, and I know I am replacable, but my boss - who is the business owner does not even know what I do. If he were to fire me or I were to quit with no notice NO ONE would know exactly what to do day to day to get the things I do done. There would be a long time of trial and error to get things back on track. And I cannot train anyone to do my job as I am the only full-time employee left. For all this that I do and no one else can do, I have not gotten a raise in over 3 years. And during this time of stagnant wages, my taxes (property and local) have gone UP. Not because of union workers but because the city I live in has decided that they have to COMPETE with other localities and are spending my tax dollars foolishly on NEW projects which willl benefit no one but local business people. But the business people are all in what we in Wisconsin call TIF (tax incremental financing) districts whereby they pay no taxes into the general funds, but only pay for improvements which supposedly will make their business more competitive. Without these "tax incentives" the business' will move to another locality where they can get the incentives. They care nothing about my community or the people who reside there.
Letting business run local government sounds like a good idea until you finally realize that those business do not care about anything but their bottom line, and will do anything to increase their own share of the pie
Those who can do, those who can't teach.
texasbob--your comment is more than offensive. Where would you be without the teachers in your life? Those who choose to be educators in any form are honorable people. They are highly educated; are lifelong learners; and understand they will never get rich. From early childhood educators to the trainers in large corporations, educators should be respected and treated with dignity. They work far harder than most people think and receive very little gratitude.
If teachers are so good, than why do they need a union? Why is the U.S.A ranked 14th in reading 17th in science and 25th in mathematics? If they cannot do better than this and still expect a pay check I am not sure about the honorable part.
Much of the union business has nothing to do with compensation and everything to do with the quality and structure if the students' day. Without negotiating power, schools can run any hours, any days of the week, for as long in the year as the individual schoolboards would like. Class sizes would be uncontrolled. Your child's teacher may or may not get the inservice time they need to stay effective and current. It's not all about money.
texasbob--yes, we are lagging other countries in terms of quality of education. Why? Because we do not put education first in this country. We do not expect excellence from our students; we do not applaud excellence in our teachers; we do not respect our schools and educators. We are too worried about whether our children are upset; whether they have plenty of free time; whether our job as parents is too hard. When a student comes to a classroom, they arrive with all the baggage from home and are often unsupported from home in regard to their education. Teachers spend unbelievable hours of off duty time preparing lessons, researching resources, increasing their own education levels, grading school work and creating assignments etc etc etc. The time they have "free" is usually spent trying to create a good environment in their classrooms and dealing with issues their students have that are not education related. We are beginning to see how this all plays out as our college students only do the bare minimum required and have little commitment to the learning they have the privilege of having at their fingertips. They decry any expectations on the part of professors and are offended when told they must meet deadlines. How do I know all of this? My husband, daughter, son, and daughter-in-law are educators and I come from a long line of educators and lifelong learners. I returned to college at the age of 55 to work on (and accomplish, by the way) my undergrad degree in English. I spent 5 years in those college classrooms and saw the deplorable underprepared students and the total lack of commitment and appreciation for the privilege of learning. It broke my heart to see it. So, until this country decides to make education a priority in our homes, our towns, our schools, and our governmental language, we can expect to lose our place in the global economy. Sir, your disdain for teachers is part of the problem. Can you begin to be a part of the solution?
Linda I bow to you. When education becomes a priority in this country we will finally be able to compete with other countries.
Linda, while my kids were in school I would go visit their teacher during their teacher conferences only to find out the teachers were willfully unprepared to teach many of the subjects assigned to them. Now I talk to my grandkids about their school and it is evident their teachers are unprepared. When I went to college many of my instructors were out dated and unprepared to teach new and cutting edge technologies my peers and I needed to succeed after graduation. Recently I went back to college to update my skill set; a total waste of money.
I too believe education need to be a priority, but as I watch the new on Wisconsin it is evident that education is not the priority of the teachers there.
Please don’t take my disdain for teachers personal; I have disdain for everyone that I am forced to pay that do not earn the wages given to them.
Way to go Wisconsin!!! I'm amazed at the amount of support for this on the MSNBC site! Maybe our country is actually waking up to our fiscal situation.
Obama wanted class warfare... Not working out too well for his Union supporters now is it?
Bull - I for one am sick and tired of workers, especially government workers, being dumped on by you rich Republican thugs.
I'm a lifelong Republican and lifelong government worker (20 years miliary and on my 1 year of civil service). Way to go Wisconsin. No need for unions in the government, let alone industry. There are enough government regulations now to protect workers.
Unions prevent you from firing unqualified workers. Time for them to go. And yes, I'm a member of a government union, forcefully conscripted.
It's only supported on an MSNBC site because it's a republican base on this site. The real solution for budget deficit is slashing military spending by a good 50% or so. They're useless anyhow.
So you retired on a pension after twenty years? Are you getting medical? Maybe there's the problem. Time to cut back on those benefits along with the others.
This is about fundental fairness and shared sacrifice. Isn't it about time liberals put there money where their mouth is?
Al there is no shared sacrifice it's the poor and middle class which all these unions member are a part of that have been the ones to sacrifice.
WHEN WILL THE RICH SACRFICE?!?! So far all the calls have been to punish the poor and middle class for the problems of the rich.
It saddens me to see just how many people there are out there who are clueless. Our Wisconsin Governor along with his cronies are turning you all into lemmings. Stop and think about what you are backing. You ruin education by driving many out and I will pray that the people you depend on for care as you age can read a medicine bottle and write prescriptions correctly.
I think President Obama should lead the way. He is rich. He makes millions every year from outside his salary. Why won't he show us the way and set the example? He won't! Liberals give very little to others. Conversatives outgive liberals of the same economic level 5 to1. I am in the middle class and live within my means. Sacrifice means givinjg something up. The unions want to live like those that hire them. Well, they didn't create a company, they didn't take the risk, they didn't supply the capital. If taxes go up to keep paying the gov't union worker, it will hurt me. It's time to stop the maddness.
I work with ex-teachers and one of the things that drove them out was the union that protected the bad teachers. Any teacher that wants to quit is welcome to leave any time.
Al, you show your ignorance and prejudice when you say things like "liberals give very little to others." Are you friends with every liberal? No, because I'm a liberal and I would never be friends with someone who speaks like you. It's easy to spout statistics that you read on some conservative blog but have very little factual basis. I'm a liberal who feels that unions, like big business and and any other over-reaching entity, need to be reined in and overseen. What I give or don't give is irrelevant and is not pertinent to the topic at hand, namely unions.
I worked as a union carpenter for about 30 years, some of that time I worked on a few non-union jobs. The union jobs were much better managed, had much safer working conditions, better tools and a better trained crew. On non-union jobs some days you took your life in your hands going to work.
I am married and have four daughters. My wife is a teacher, three of my daughters are teachers. They all have B. A. degrees, one has a masters, one will start a masters program this summer. They love teaching, and none of them went into it for the money.
This whole WI debacle is not about anything other than union busting. Once the unions aren't able to protect the workers rights, the corporations will destroy the American work force. How many jobs have been outsourced. The thing is, you pay $50 for an item made in America, the job is outsourced and made way cheaper, but you still pay $50 for the same item. Where do the savings and profits go, back to the corporations. Look at an old Carhartt catalog, then look at a new one. And now the Supreme's have giving the multi-national corporations the right to give boatloads of money to candidates they support, and with the weaken labor unions unable to balance the cash flow of the corporations we end up with a congress bought and paid for by Big Business, Big Oil and the Big Banks. Doom on the American working class. $700 billion for the top 2% of wealthy Americans, no new banking regulations, watered down stock market regulations. And it's all the Presidents fault, good luck America!!!
great comment until the last line. it is in no way, shape or form the President's fault. Obama was outraged at SCOTUS ruling on Citizens United and he said so during last years State of the Union on national TV. in fact, I think it was Supreme Alito who mouthed the words "not true" when Obama blasted it. check your facts friend. it is a great comment but it is solely the fault of the GOP and tea party.............follow the money.......it will take you right to the Koch boys. & along the way you'll probably see the Tea bagger princess, Ginny Thomas, wife of Supreme Clarence Thomas. yo dude, c'mon man, face facts, this nightmare of a governor in WI is yet another teabagger spawn. they are whacked and they are dangerous. I'm proud to see my fellow Democrats stand up to their mania.
May they all should be fired Like we would for missing work!
Yes, lets all wake up and let the Neo-Cons run the show. What a great world that would be
cardboard boxes for sale will accomidate family of four buy now while supplies last.
How many times have republicans filibustered?!
One thing I don't understand about unions is how they can remain in place for some businesses while other workers do not have this sort of representation. The premise of private labor unions seems pretty unfair. Why don't we abolish private unions and give everyone the same sort of representation and rights regardless of what company they work for? Maybe we can put a tax system in place of union dues, then elect officials to pass labor laws that would apply to everyone. We could call this all encompassing union the U.S. Department of Labor...